The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement

The Fate of Unresurfaced Patellae in Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early to Midterm Results

BACKGROUND

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased significantly over the past decade in the United States, likely due to modern patella-friendly implants, complications with resurfacing, and the knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study evaluated revision-free survivorship out to 8.5 years in a cohort of contemporary primary TKAs with patella-friendly femoral components and unresurfaced patellae.

METHODS

A total of 1,053 consecutive primary TKAs with unresurfaced patellae were retrospectively reviewed. A selective patellar nonresurfacing protocol was used for all cases. Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimates were calculated based on patellar revision and the latest follow-up. An aggressive lateral patellar facetectomy was performed in 78% (823 of 1,053) of cases. The cohort was 62% women and 43% American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I or II with a mean age and body mass index of 65 years (range, 35 to 94) and 35 kg/m2 (range, 18 to 65), respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 4 (0.4%, 4 of 1,053) unresurfaced patellae were revised. Three were resurfaced as part of other procedures: 2 for global instability and one for aseptic loosening at a mean of 1.6 years; and one patella was resurfaced by an outside surgeon for unexplained pain. The all-cause revision-free survivorship estimate specifically related to the patella was 98.9% (95% confidence interval, 98 to 100) out to 8.5 years. No significant difference in survivorship was related to patellae with or without a lateral patellar facetectomy (99.5 versus 98.1%, P ≥ .191); however, 3 of 4 patellar revisions occurred in TKAs without a lateral patellar facetectomy (P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate excellent revision-free survivorship related to unresurfaced patellae, particularly when a lateral facetectomy was performed. These early to midterm results using modern patella-friendly femoral components are promising and comparable to resurfaced patellae in the literature.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The effect of femoral prosthesis design on patellofemoral contact stresses in total knee arthroplasty: a case-control study with mid-term follow-up minimum 3-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

To investigate the differences in postoperative patellofemoral pressures and patellar tracking during at least three years of follow-up in patients using three prostheses of different designs in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

RADIOGRAPHIC INVESTIGATIONS: The study included 401 patients who had a total of 480 knee prostheses implanted without patellar resurfacing. The prostheses used were Genesis II (external rotation design of femoral prosthesis), Triathlon (design with deep trochlear grooves), and Gemini MK II (deepening of trochlear groove and lateral condylar protrusion that closely follows the anatomical shape). The patients' patellar tracking was assessed by measuring patellar tilt and displacement during postoperative follow-up. Furthermore, postoperative knee function and pain were evaluated through range of motion, Knee Society scores (KSS), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) to compare the different groups.

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Constructing a finite element model of the knee joint of a normal volunteer after total knee arthroplasty using different prostheses for nonpatellar replacement. The three models' von Mises stress distribution heat map, peak contact pressure, and patellar transverse displacement were compared at 30°, 60°, and 90°, respectively.

RESULTS

RADIOGRAPHIC INVESTIGATIONS: A total of 456 knees of 384 patients were investigated at a 3-year follow-up after TKA without patellar resurfacing. There were no significant differences in patellar tracking between the three groups. Patients with all three prostheses demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes at 3 years postoperatively, with no statistically significant differences in knee scores (91.9 vs 92.3 vs 91.8) or range of motion (127.9° vs 128.5° vs 127.7°) between the groups. However, there was a significant difference between Genesis II and Gemini MK II in the Forgotten Joint Score (59.7 vs 62.4). Patients with persistent postoperative anterior knee pain were present in all three groups (16 vs 12 vs 10), but the incidence was not significantly different.

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

The von Mises stress distribution heat map showed that during flexion, the patellofemoral stresses were mainly concentrated on the lateral side of the prosthesis side, and the contact site gradually shifted downward with increasing flexion angle. At the same time, the peak contact stress of the patellofemoral joint increased with the gradual increase in the flexion angle. Genesis II, with a wider and shallower trochlear groove, showed greater patellofemoral stresses and lateral patellar displacement after TKA without patellar resurfacing. The Gemini MK II with a deeper trochlear groove and slightly protruding lateral condyle is more in line with anatomical design, with smaller patellofemoral joint pressure and better patellar tracking.

CONCLUSIONS

In TKA without patellar resurfacing, a prosthesis with a deeper trochlear groove, a slightly higher lateral femoral condyle, and a more anatomically designed knee that better matches the patellar morphology should be a better choice.

Selective Patella Resurfacing in Contemporary Cruciate Retaining and Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis

BACKGROUND

Leaving the patella unresurfaced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing due to modern patella-friendly implants, awareness that complications are not uncommon with resurfacing, and knowledge that historical studies were scientifically confounded. This study examined the effect of selective patellar resurfacing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using modern implants and techniques in cohorts rigorously matched for demographics and osteoarthritis severity.

METHODS

A total of 166 TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were case-control matched to 166 TKAs with patella resurfacing. Case-control matching was based on demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status, comorbidities, and osteoarthritis severity. No significant differences were observed between cohorts for demographics (P ≥ .347), comorbidities (P ≥ .443), or radiographic osteoarthritis severity (P ≥ .078). Radiographic alignment and prospectively collected PROMs were evaluated preoperatively and at latest clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, patellar tilt was less for the unresurfaced patella group (3 versus 4°, P = .003); however, postoperative patellar tilt was not different (3 versus 3°, P = .225). At a mean of 2.1 years follow-up (range, 1 to 7), University of California Los Angeles Activity Level was significantly higher for the unresurfaced patella group (6.3 versus 5.5, P = .002), but the mean group difference did not reach a minimal clinically important difference. There were no other significant differences in PROMs or reoperation rates between cohorts (P ≥ .135).

CONCLUSION

In contemporary cruciate retaining and substituting TKA designs, not resurfacing the patella in select patients may achieve comparable PROMs and re-operation rates; and potentially greater activity level compared to patella resurfacing at early follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Osteoarthritic Severity in Unresurfaced Patellae Does Not Adversely Affect Patient-reported Outcomes in Contemporary Primary TKA

Introduction:

The degree of osteoarthritis (OA) acceptable to leave in a native patella during unresurfaced total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown. This study's purpose was to examine the effect of patellofemoral OA severity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in primary TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing.

Methods:

One hundred ninety-three primary TKAs performed without patellar resurfacing were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative patellofemoral OA severity was graded on severity, marginal osteophytes, joint space narrowing, and chondral damage using accepted grading systems. Patellar tilt and tibiofemoral alignment were measured radiographically. PROMs were evaluated at a minimum of 1-year follow-up.

Results:

In multivariate regression, preoperative lateral patella Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2 was associated with superior change in Knee Society Score pain with level walking, higher absolute change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (P ≤ 0.029), and knees ‟always feeling normal” (odds ratio [OR] 3.12; P = 0.005). Osteoarthritis Research Society International atlas grades and Outerbridge classification scores did not significantly influence PROMs.

Discussion:

Worse preoperative OA severity in the lateral patellar facet, graded with the Kellgren-Lawrence system, predicted superior knee-specific PROMs in patients with unresurfaced patellae after contemporary TKA. This observation supports the clinical finding that patients with more severe OA have optimized patient outcomes and highlights the minimal contribution of patella OA to knee function after primary TKA.

Patellar management during total knee arthroplasty: a review

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial and surgeons tend to approach the patella with one of three general mindsets: always resurface the patella, never resurface the patella, or selectively resurface the patella based on specific patient or patellar criteria.

Studies comparing resurfacing and non-resurfacing of the patella during TKA have reported inconsistent and contradictory findings.

When resurfacing the patella is chosen, there are a number of available patellar component designs, materials, and techniques for cutting and fixation.

When patellar non-resurfacing is chosen, several alternatives are available, including patellar denervation, lateral retinacular release, and patelloplasty. Surgeons may choose to perform any of these alone, or together in some combination.

Prospective randomized studies are needed to better understand which patellar management techniques contribute to superior postoperative outcomes. Until then, this remains a controversial topic, and options for patellar management will need to be weighed on an individual basis per patient.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:861-871. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200156

Biomechanical Analysis of Non-Metallic Biomaterial in the Manufacture of a New Knee Prosthesis

The increase in the number of revision surgeries after a total knee replacement surgery reaches 19%. One of the reasons for the majority of revisions relates to the debris of the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene that serves to facilitate the sliding between the femoral and tibial components. This paper addresses the biomechanical properties of ULTEM^TM 1010 in a totally new knee replacement design, based on one of the commercial models of the Stryker manufacturer. It is designed and produced through additive manufacturing that replaces the tibial component and the polyethylene in such a way as to reduce the pieces that are part of the prosthetic assembly to only two: the femoral and the tibial (the so-called “two-component knee prosthesis”). The cytotoxicity as well as the live/dead tests carried out on a series of biomaterials guarantee the best osteointegration of the studied material. The finite element simulation method guarantees the stability of the material before a load of 2000 N is applied in the bending angles 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. Thus, the non-metallic prosthetic material and approach represent a promising alternative for metal-allergic patients.

Evaluating the "Patella-Friendly" Concept in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up Outcome Study Comparing Constant Radius, Multiradius Cruciate-Retaining, and Nonanatomical Cruciate-Retaining Implants

BACKGROUND

Patella-friendly femoral components were developed in order to reduce anterior knee pain and patellofemoral complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but their effect on long-term outcome is still unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated prospectively collected data from 3 groups consisting of 100 patients (100 knees in each). In group A, the constant radius a-MP, in group B the multiradius cruciate-retaining Genesis II, and in group C the nonanatomic, multiradius, cruciate-retaining AGC TKA was implanted. Patients of all groups were matched for age, gender, side, body mass index, and length of follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative clinical outcome data in the form of Knee Society System (KSS), Short Form-12, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, and Oxford Knee Score were available at regular intervals for groups A and B. For patients of group C, KSS score data were available at the same time intervals. In all groups, the patellofemoral compartment was assessed using the Clinical Patella Score scale. Anterior knee pain, secondary patella resurfacing, implant failure, and radiological outcome were assessed in patients of all groups.

RESULTS

At 10-year and 15-year follow-up, patients of group A showed statistically significant (s.s.) higher (all P = .000) KSS values as compared to those of groups B and C. At 15-year follow-up, patients of group B showed s.s. higher (P = .001) KSS values as compared to those of group C. At 10-year and 15-year follow up, patients of group A showed s.s. higher (all P = .00) Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Oxford Knee Score values as compared to those of group B. At 15-year follow-up only, patients of group A showed s.s. higher (P = .00) Short Form-12 (physical) values as compared to those of group B. In terms of Clinical Patella Score, patients in group A had s.s. higher values (P = .05) when compared to those of groups B and C. Anterior knee pain was recorded in 4.4% of TKAs in group A, 7.5% in group B, and 17.2% in group C. One (1.1%) patient in group A, 3 (3.25%) in group B, and 7 (8%) in group C underwent secondary resurfacing.

CONCLUSION

Anatomical, patella-friendly, constant radius femoral components outperform others in reducing anterior knee pain and patella complications in TKA in which the patellae are left nonresurfaced.

Gender differences in femoral trochlea morphology

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the morphology of the anterior femoral condyle using a quantitative three-dimensional reconstruction method. The morphological data were compared between genders.

METHODS

Computed tomography scans of femurs were taken from 90 healthy subjects and then reconstructed in 3D modeling software. Coaxial cutting planes were created at 10° increments to measure the lateral and medial anterior condylar heights (LACH and MACH, respectively), lateral and medial trochlear groove widths (LTW and MTW, respectively), and for trochlear groove tracking. The absolute values and normalized data were compared between male and female subjects. The sulcus angle and deepest point of the trochlear groove at each cross-section were also analyzed to determine the differences in the depth of the trochlear groove.

RESULTS

The absolute dimensions of LACH, MACH, LTW, and MTW were significantly smaller in the female subjects, by 10.5%, 36.9%, 10.3%, and 11.0%, respectively, than in the males (p < 0.05). After normalization, no significant difference was found in the condylar height between the genders. However, the female subjects had a significantly larger value of approximately 7.9% for the normalized trochlear width.

CONCLUSION

Male subjects had greater condylar heights and widths than the female subjects. Although the trajectory of the trochlear groove varied greatly among the subjects, the trochlear groove appeared to be wider and shallower in the female subjects than in the male subjects. These results provide important information for the design of femoral trochlea to fit Asian female patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Long-Term Comparison Study of Patella Resurfacing Versus Non-resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty with Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty is a matter of constant debate. Numerous studies have assessed and compared the mechanical and clinical results of total knee arthroplasty with native as well as resurfaced patellae. However, the consensus has not been reached yet on this subject. This study aims to compare the outcome between patella resurfaced (PR) and non-resurfaced patellae (NPR) after a follow-up of minimum 10 years following total knee arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study including 63 subjects (103 knees) who had undergone total knee arthroplasty with a follow-up of 10-14 years. In this study, we evaluated the knees implanted with either press fit condylar (PFC) sigma (Depuy, Johnson & Johnson) or Nexgen (CR flex/LPS flex) (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) implants. Whether to perform patella resurfacing or not and choice of implants as well as implant design (posterior stabilized/cruciate retaining) was surgeons' preference. At final follow-up, clinical and functional outcome was assessed using Knee Society Scores (KSS), and comparison of difference between pre-op scores and scores at final follow-up among resurfaced versus non-resurfaced patellae groups was carried out. Patello-femoral function was assessed at final follow-up using Feller's score and the results were compared between resurfaced and non-resurfaced patellae.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 140 months (range 124-168 months). There were 62 knees with their patella resurfaced and 41 knees with non-resurfaced patellae There was no significant difference in the mean pre-op Knee Society Scores between PR (46.29 ± 5.17) and NPR (47.34 ± 5.95), p value 0.34. Similarly there was no significant difference in their pre-op functional score as well PR (38.53 ± 5.14) and NPR (39.22 ± 6.79), p value 0.56. Both groups had significantly improved post-operative Knee Society Scores PR (85.95 ± 5.23) and NPR (84.65 ± 5.30). However, there is no difference between these groups, p value 0.22. Functional scores also maintained significant improvement at final follow-up. Between the two groups, the resurfaced group showed a significantly higher functional score at final follow-up: PR (70.90 ± 7.73) and NPR (66.44 ± 7.12), p value 0.02. Feller's score at final follow-up for PR group was (23.36) and NPR group was (21.98), p value 0.001, which showed clear superiority of PR over NPR.

CONCLUSION

After a minimum follow-up of 10 years, there were no differences in clinical results; however, the knee function score and patello-femoral function scoring was found to be significantly higher with patella resurfacing and it was persistent across all the subgroups we had included in the study-posterior stabilized/cruciate retaining or between implants made by two different manufacturers.

Prevalence of anterior knee pain after patellar retention total knee arthroplasty: Comparison of patients with rheumatoid arthritis versus primary osteoarthritis

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an increased risk of anterior knee pain (AKP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) without patellar resurfacing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) versus primary osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

This study was a retrospective review of 388 patients (577 knees) who underwent TKA without patellar resurfacing between 2003 and 2011, with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups: Group OA (273 knees of 206 patients; 83 males, 123 females; mean age: 64.4 (47–87) years) and Group RA (304 knees of 182 patients; 92 males, 90 females; mean age: 50.7 (21–72) years). In the clinical evaluation, the knee range of motion (ROM) and several outcome measures such as The Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were used preoperatively and at the final follow-up visit. The quality of life was measured using Short Form (SF)-36 MCS and PCS scores. The primary outcome was the frequency and severity of patient-reported AKP. The AKP Scale was used to determine the severity of AKP.

Results

The IKDC raised from 21.62 (range, 13–29.9) preoperatively to 85.1 (range, 80–88) for group OA and from 21.8 (range, 13–29.9) to 85.2 (range, 81–88) for group RA (p < 0.001). The mean KSS improved from 28.35 (range, 22–38) preoperatively to 90.04 (range, 88–95) for group OA and from 21.9 (range, 18–35) preoperatively to 89.7 (range, 86–95) for group RA. The mean WOMAC increased from 20.61 (range, 17.4–24.2) preoperatively to 95.7 (range, 90.9–97.7) for group OA (p < 0.001) and from 20.2 (range, 16.7–24.2) preoperatively to 95.8 (range, 90.9–98.5) for group RA (p < 0.001). The mean ROM improved from 80.14° (range, 55°–130°) preoperatively to 113.17° (range, 95°–140°) in group OA (P = 0.003) and from 73.4° (range, 10°–130°) to 112.8° (range 90°–140°) in group RA (P = 0.003) postoperatively. The frequency of AKP was 8% in Group OA and 7% in Group RA (p = 0.27). For patients with AKP, the mean AKP Scale was 92.74 (range, 84–98) in Group OA and 93.39 (range, 82–98) in Group RA (p = 0.3).

Conclusion

After TKA without resurfacing the patella, patients with RA were determined to have a similar risk for AKP as those with OA.

Level of evidence

Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using a contemporary patella-friendly implant are unaware of any differences due to patellar resurfacing

PURPOSE

Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often unexplained, spurring ongoing debates on the need for patellar resurfacing. It was hypothesized that a contemporary patella-friendly implant would restore patellofemoral kinematics more physiologically than outdated implants and that there would be no perceived or clinically demonstrable differences due to resurfacing of patella (RP).

METHODS

This prospective bilateral randomized study was undertaken in 49 patients scheduled for the same-day bilateral TKAs. One knee was subjected at random to RP while withholding RP on the opposing side (non-RP). A recently approved single-radius femoral prosthesis featuring a deep, elongate trochlear groove with lateral tilt and a high lateral flange was implanted bilaterally in all patients. Mean follow-up duration was 5 years. Group comparisons were based on patient-reported outcomes [anterior knee pain, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and side preference], physician-rated results [Feller patellofemoral (PF) score], radiographic patellar position, patella-related complications, and need for reoperation.

RESULTS

There were no differences in midterm rates of anterior knee pain (RP 8%; non-RP 4%; n.s.), FJS (all n.s.), or side preference (RP 47%; non-RP 45%; n.s.), nor did the groups differ by Feller PF score (all n.s.) or radiographic patellar position (all n.s.). No secondary resurfacings of non-RP or RP revisions were required.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were incapable of distinguishing whether RP was done, casting doubt on its benefits. Surgeons may thus forego RP during TKA when using contemporary patella-friendly TKA implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level I.

Usually, Selectively, or Rarely Resurfacing the Patella During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Determining the Best Strategy

BACKGROUND

Surgeons may "usually" resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA), "rarely" resurface, or "selectively" resurface on the basis of certain criteria. It is unknown which of these 3 strategies yields superior outcomes. Utilizing New Zealand Joint Registry data, we investigated (1) what proportion of surgeons employs each of the 3 patellar resurfacing strategies, (2) which strategy is associated with the lowest overall revision rate, and (3) which strategy is associated with the highest 6-month and 5-year Oxford Knee Score (OKS).

METHODS

Two hundred and three surgeons who performed a total of 57,766 primary TKAs from 1999 to 2015 were categorized into the 3 surgeon strategies on the basis of how often they resurfaced the patella during primary total knee arthroplasty; with "rarely" defined as <10% of the time, "selectively" as ≥10% to ≤90%, and "usually" as >90%. For each strategy, the cumulative incidence of all-cause revision was calculated and utilized to construct Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The mean 6-month and 5-year postoperative OKS for each group were utilized for comparison.

RESULTS

Overall, 57% of surgeons selectively resurfaced, 37% rarely resurfaced, and 7% usually resurfaced. The usually resurfacing group was associated with the highest mean OKS at both 6 months (38.57; p < 0.001) and 5 years postoperatively (41.34; p = 0.029), followed by the selectively resurfacing group (6-month OKS, 37.79; 5-year OKS, 40.87) and the rarely resurfacing group (6-month OKS, 36.92; 5-year OKS, 40.02). Overall, there was no difference in the revision rate per 100 component years among the rarely (0.46), selectively (0.52), or usually (0.46) resurfacing groups (p = 0.587). Posterior-stabilized TKAs that were performed by surgeons who selectively resurfaced had a lower revision rate (0.54) than those by surgeons who usually resurfaced (0.64) or rarely resurfaced (0.74; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Usually resurfacing the patella was associated with improved patient-reported outcomes, but there was no difference in overall revision rates among the 3 strategies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A prospective evaluation of a largely cementless total knee arthroplasty cohort without patellar resurfacing: 10-year outcomes and survivorship

BACKGROUND

The theoretical benefits of a mobile bearing design in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) include increased articular surface conformity with a reduction in both polyethylene wear and implant interface shear. However, to date these theoretical advantages have not been translated into published evidence of superior survivorship. This paper presents the results of a prospective, non-comparative study evaluating the performance of the mobile bearing Low Contact Stress LCS Complete Rotating Platform TKA in a largely cementless cohort without patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

237 consecutive patients (240 knees) undergoing primary TKA were prospectively recruited. All received the LCS Complete Rotating Platform TKA (DePuy International, Leeds, UK). Clinical and radiographic assessments were performed at 3, 12, 60 and 120 months post-operatively. Radiographic evaluation was performed by an independent external surgeon.

RESULTS

The mean age was 70.3 years. 77.5% of cases were cementless. Radiographic assessment suggested excellent femoral component fixation. 22 tibial radiolucent lines (RLLs) > 1 mm were observed in 12 knees. No RLLs were progressive. There have been two revisions; one for late infection and one for aseptic loosening. No patients underwent secondary patellar resurfacing. The cumulative implant survivorship, using component revision for any reason as the endpoint, was 98.9% (95% CI, 95.6 to 99.7%) at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The excellent survivorship at a minimum 10-year follow-up supports the use of uncemented porous coated fixation without patellar resurfacing with the non-posterior stabilized LCS Complete Rotating Platform TKA.

Outcome of prosthesis matched and unmatched patella components in primary and revision total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Although knee replacements have specifically designed patella prostheses that correspond to the geometry of their femoral components, a patella prosthesis that is unmatched to the femoral component may occasionally be inserted. In revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), an originally resurfaced patella may be left, but the femoral component revised to one that does not match the patella. Few studies have compared the outcome of matched and unmatched patella components in TKA. This study compared the primary or revision TKA outcome of procedures where patella components matched to their femoral counterparts were inserted, with procedures using patella and femoral components that were unmatched.

METHODS

Data on all primary and revision TKA procedures without a patella component or a matched or an unmatched patella component were obtained from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Revision surgery was the outcome measure. Cumulative percent revised (CPR) were calculated and Hazard ratios with p values were used to test statistical significance.

RESULTS

In primary TKA, there were higher rates of revision where unmatched patella components were used, regardless of implant design. There was no difference in the second revision rates of unmatched versus matched patella component groups. This was evident where delayed resurfacing was carried out, and where the patella prosthesis was left alone but the femoral component was changed.

CONCLUSIONS

All primary TKA procedures require a patella component corresponding to the femoral component if the patella is resurfaced. Conversely, revision knee arthroplasties are not affected by the use of dissimilar patella and femoral components.

In Vivo Three-Dimensional Patellar Mechanics: Normal Knees Compared with Domed and Anatomic Patellar Components

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral complications are a major cause of revision surgery following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). High forces occurring at the patellofemoral articulation coupled with a small patellofemoral contact area pose substantial design challenges. In this study, the three-dimensional (3D) in vivo mechanics of domed and anatomically shaped patellar components were compared with those of native patellae.

METHODS

Ten normal knees, 10 treated with an LCS-PS (low contact stress-posterior stabilized) TKA (anatomically shaped patellar component), and 10 treated with a PFC Sigma RP-PS (press-fit condylar Sigma rotating platform-posterior stabilized) TKA (domed patellar component) were analyzed under fluoroscopic surveillance while the patient performed a weight-bearing deep knee bend from full knee extension to maximum knee flexion. Relevant bone geometries were segmented out from computed tomography (CT) scans, and computer-assisted-design (CAD) models of the implanted components were obtained from the manufacturer. Three-dimensional patellofemoral kinematics were obtained using a 3D-to-2D registration process. Contact mechanics were calculated using a distance map between the articulating patellar and femoral surfaces.

RESULTS

Both patellar component designs exhibited good rotational kinematics and tracked well within the femoral trochlea when compared with the normal patella. The contact areas in the TKA groups peaked at 60° of knee flexion (mean and standard deviation, 201 ± 63.4 mm for the LCS-PS group and 218 ± 95.4 mm for the Sigma RP-PS group), and the areas were substantially smaller than those previously reported for the normal patella. Contact points in the TKA groups stayed close to the center of the patellar components.

CONCLUSIONS

Both designs performed satisfactorily, although patellofemoral contact areas were reduced in comparison with those in the native patella.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Influence of Different Patellofemoral Design Variations Based on Genesis II Total Knee Endoprosthesis on Patellofemoral Pressure and Kinematics

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patellofemoral groove design varies greatly and likely has a distinct influence on patellofemoral biomechanics. To analyse the selective influence, five patellofemoral design variations were developed based on Genesis II total knee endoprosthesis (original design, being completely flat, being laterally elevated, being medially elevated, and both sides elevated) and made from polyamide using rapid prototyping. Muscle-loaded knee flexion was simulated on 10 human knee specimens using a custom-made knee simulator, measuring the patellofemoral pressure distribution and tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics. The measurements were carried out in the native knee as well as after TKA with the 5 design prototypes. The overall influence of the different designs on the patellofemoral kinematics was small, but we found detectable effects for mediolateral tilt (p < 0.05 for 35°-80° flexion) and translation of the patella (p < 0.045 for 20°-65° and 75°-90°), especially for the completely flat design. Considering patellofemoral pressures, major interindividual differences were seen between the designs, which, on average, largely cancelled each other out. These results suggest that the elevation of the lateral margin of the patellofemoral groove is essential for providing mediolateral guidance, but smooth contouring as with original Genesis II design seems to be sufficient. The pronounced interindividual differences identify a need for more patellofemoral design options in TKA.

Should the position of the patellar component replicate the vertical median ridge of the native patella?

BACKGROUND

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the position of the patellar component can affect patellar tracking. However, the patellar component cannot always replicate the original high point of the patella because of anatomical variance. This study investigated whether altering the highest point of the patella can affect outcomes of primary TKA, especially in patients having a patella with a far-medialized median ridge.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed for 177 knees (143 patients) treated with primary TKA between July 2011 and March 2014. Group 1 (34 knees) had the patellar component displaced over three millimeters from the median ridge, while Group 2 (143 knees) had the patellar component placed on the original median ridge position. The one-year follow-up outcomes were reviewed, including: patellar tilt angle, Knee Society Score, Feller Patellar Score, and modified Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Score.

RESULTS

Mean (±standard deviation) displacement of the patellar component in Group 1 was 3.97±0.97mm lateral to the original position of the median ridge, with a significant decrease in lateral patellar tilt angle (P<0.001). Lateral patellar tilt showed a positive correlation with the medialization of the patellar component (P<0.001, r=0.401). Ability to rise from a chair was better in Group 1 (P=0.025). There were no other between-group differences in other clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

There should be no need for the patellar component to replicate the original highest point of the native patella in primary TKA.

Stress distribution of the patellofemoral joint in the anatomic V-shape and curved dome-shape femoral component: a comparison of resurfaced and unresurfaced patellae

PURPOSE

Whether to resurface the patella in knee replacement remains a controversial issue. The geometrical design of the trochlear groove in the femoral component could play an important role in determining the stress distribution on the patellofemoral joint, but this has not been sufficiently reported on. This study attempted to determine the effect of implant design on contact mechanics by means of a finite element method.

METHODS

Two designs, an anatomical V-shape design (VSD) and a dome-shape design (DSD), for the anterior trochlear surface in a contemporary femoral component were chosen for examining the contact characteristics. The use and absence of patella resurfacing was simulated. The stress and strain distribution on the patellar bone and the polyethylene component were calculated for comparison.

RESULTS

Without patellar resurfacing, the maximal compressive strain in the patellar bone in the VSD model was about 20 % lower than the DSD model. On the other hand, with resurfacing, the maximal strain for the VSD model was 13.3 % greater than for DSD. Uneven stress distribution at the bone-implant interface was also noted for the two designs.

CONCLUSION

The femoral component with a V-shape trochlear groove reduced the compressive strain on the unresurfaced patella. If resurfacing the patella, the femoral component with a curved domed-shape design might reduce the strain in the remaining patellar bone. Uneven stress could occur at the bone-implant interface, so design modifications for improving fixation strength and medialization of the patellar button would be helpful in reducing the risk of peg fracture or loosening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Intraoperative anthropomorphic study of anterior femoral condyles compared with sizing of femoral arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The present study was designed to compare the dimensions of the anterior femoral condyle with those of the anterior component flange using intraoperative morphological data.

METHODS

Overall, 1227 knees in 962 patients were included in this study. The height of the anterior lateral/medial condylar height (ALCH/AMCH) was measured and compared between men and women. These morphological data were compared with the dimensions of the chosen component for each patient. The lateral/medial anterior femoral offset was calculated, and the over-/understuffing rates were compared between men and women.

RESULTS

The median ALCH in men was 8.5 mm (6.5, 10.0 mm) versus 7.0 mm (6.0, 9.0 mm) in women. The median AMCH in men was 4.0 mm (2.5, 6.0 mm) versus 3.5 mm (2.5, 6.0 mm) in women. There was a significant difference between the genders with respect to ALCH (p < 0.05). When the dimensions of the component were compared with those of the native knee, the anterior lateral flange height was smaller than the native knees (1.3 mm in male, 0.7 mm in female), but the anterior medial flange height was larger than the corresponding condyle (1.8 mm in male, 1.8 mm in female). A significant difference was observed between the genders with respect to the ideal fit rate of ALCH (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that gender differences exist in the anterior lateral condyles of knees. The anterior flange of component is not designed to precisely reproduce normal trochlear anatomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Evolution of trochlear compartment geometry in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to compare trochlear profiles in recent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) models and to determine whether they feature improvements compared to their predecessors. The hypothesis was that recent TKA models have more anatomic trochlear compartments and would display no signs of trochlear dysplasia.

METHODS

The authors analyzed the geometry of the 6 following TKA models using engineering software: PFC and Attune (DePuy), NexGen and Persona (Zimmer), Noetos and KneeTec (Tornier). The mediolateral trochlear profiles were plotted at various flexion angles (0°, 15°, 30° and 45°) to deduce the sulcus angle.

RESULTS

Analysis of sulcus angles reveals general convergence of recent designs towards anatomic values. At 0° of flexion, sulcus angles of recent implant models were between 156.0-157.4°, while those of previous generation models between 154.5-165.5°. At 30° of flexion, sulcus angles of recent models also lie within 145.7-148.6°, but those of previous models are between 149.5-152.0°. All three manufacturers deepened their trochlear profile at 30° of flexion in recent models compared to earlier designs. Sulcus angles converge towards anatomic values but still exceed radiologic signs of dysplasia by 2-5°.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent TKA designs have more anatomic trochlear geometries than earlier TKA models by the same manufacturers, but trochlear compartments still exceed radiologic signs of trochlear dysplasia by 2° to 5°. The hypothesis that recent TKA models display no signs of trochlear dysplasia is therefore refuted. Surgeons should be aware of design limitations to optimize choice of implant and extensor mechanisms alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV geometric implant analysis.

Patellofemoral kinematics during deep knee flexion after total knee replacement: a computational simulation

PURPOSE

Actions requiring deep knee flexion, such as kneeling and squatting, are challenging to perform after total knee replacement (TKR), though many manufactures emphasize that their knee prostheses could safely achieve high flexion. Little is known about the patellofemoral kinematics during deep flexion. This study aimed to track the movement of the patella during kneeling and squatting through dynamic computational simulation.

METHODS

A validated knee model was used to analyse the patellar kinematics after TKR, including shifting, tilting and rotation. The data were captured from full extension to 135° of knee flexion. For kneeling, an anterior force of 500 N was applied perpendicularly on the tibial tubercle as the knee flexed from 90° to 135°. For squatting, a ground reaction force was applied through the tibia from full extension to 135° of flexion.

RESULTS

This study found that patellar shifting and rotation in kneeling were similar to those while squatting. However, during kneeling, the patella had a greater medial tilt and showed signs of abrupt patellar tilt owning to an external force being concentrated on the tibial tubercle.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of squatting and kneeling movements, the latter is a more strenuous action for the patellofemoral joint after TKR due to the high forces acting on the tibial tubercle. It is suggested that overweight patients or those requiring high flexion should try to avoid kneeling to reduce the risk of the polyethylene wear. Further modification of trochlear geometry may be required to accommodate abrupt changes in patellar tilting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Early PROMs following total knee arthroplasty--functional outcome dependent on patella resurfacing

Patella resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. Variation in published results for patella resurfacing may potentially be explained by differences in design between TKA brands. We interrogated NJR-PROMs data to ascertain whether there is an early functional benefit to resurfacing the patella, both overall and for each of the five most popular primary knee designs through use of the Oxford Knee Score. A total of 8103 resurfaced TKAs and 15,290 nonresurfaced TKAs were studied. There was a large variation in the proportion of knees undergoing patella resurfacing by brand (Nexgen=16% versus Triathlon=52%). Patellar resurfacing did not significantly influence the magnitude of improvement in overall knee function or anterior knee-specific function irrespective of TKA brand or for cruciate retaining versus sacrificing designs.

Outcomes of 447 SCORE® highly congruent mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties after 5-10 years follow-up

INTRODUCTION

The goal of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties (TKA) with an anatomical trochlea is to reduce polyethylene wear, the risk of loosening, and patellofemoral complications. Rotating mobile-bearing SCORE(®) TKA was designed according to these principles with standard instrumentation for component placement and a specific computer navigation system, Amplivision(®).

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the results of SCORE(®) TKA would be satisfactory and better using computer navigation with or without patellar resurfacing and that there would be no specific patellofemoral complications associated with this trochlear design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred and forty-seven SCORE(®) TKA were performed. Outcome assessment was based on the IKS score, and component survival calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 6.6 years (maximum 10.6 years). Six percent of patients were lost to follow-up. Ninety-eight percent of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied. The IKS knee score was 89 points and the function score was 86. The mechanical axis was 180° (174-186), and it was significantly improved if the initial deformity was severe and TKA was computer navigated. There were nine revisions (one for fracture, two for pain, two for stiffness, four for infection).

DISCUSSION

This study confirmed our hypothesis: the results of SCORE(®) TKA were very satisfying after at least 5 years of follow-up because there was no mechanical loosening, no bearing dislocation and no patellofemoral complications with or without patellar resurfacing. Results were identical whether patellar resurfacing was performed or not. Although clinical results were not better for computer- navigated TKA, radiological results were. At 98 months of follow-up, component survival in relation to the risk of aseptic loosening or patellofemoral complications was 100%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV continuous retrospective study.

Evaluation of patellofemoral joint in ADVANCE Medial-pivot total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

ADVANCE Medial Pivot (MP) (Wright Medical) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was established to replicate normal tibio-femoral knee joint kinematics, however, its influence on the patello-femoral (PF) joint is unclear. The purpose in this study was to assess the PF joint conditions in Advance MP TKA, via radiography and three-dimensional image-matching software.

METHODS

Ten subjects with osteoarthritis were treated with the ADVANCE MP TKA. Pre-operatively and one month after surgery, skyline views at 30, 60, and 90° of flexion were taken, and patella shift and tilt were measured. With 2D-3D registration techniques using software, implant orientations were matched with the pre-operative CT and changes in the anterior part of the femoral prosthesis, condylar twist angle (CTA) for femoral rotation, and tibial rotation were evaluated. The relationships between morphological and rotational changes were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in patella tilt at 60° and patella shift at all angles between pre- and post-operation (p < 0.05). No correlation was found between morphological changes in the anterior femur with patella tilt and shift. A positive correlation between postoperative CTA and patella shift at 90° was found (p < 0.05); however, no correlation was found between rotational alignment of the tibial component and patella tilt and shift.

CONCLUSIONS

ADVANCE MP TKA changed patello-femoral joint kinematics, compared to that found before surgery. The kinematic features were mainly due to the design concepts for tibio-femoral joint motion, indicating the difficulty to reproduce normal patello-femoral joint kinematics after TKA.

A longitudinal study of the quantitative evaluation of patella cartilage after total knee replacement by delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping at 3.0 T: preliminary results

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the quantitative changes of patella cartilage over time after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 mapping at 3.0 T.

METHOD

Twenty-six knees of 26 patients (23 women and three men, mean age, 75 years) with primary osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis of the knee underwent TKA with a zirconia ceramic implant in this prospective study. Twelve patients without patella resurfacing (NR group) and 14 patients with patella resurfacing (R group) had TKA with cemented fixation. The implant position was examined by radiograph, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The clinical scores were checked pre-operatively, 1 year post-operatively and at the final follow-up. Patella cartilage and its thickness were evaluated pre-operatively and 1 year after TKA by dGEMRIC and T2 mapping in the NR group only. Patella cartilage was divided into eight regions of interest: the deep and superficial layers of the outer lateral and medial half, and the inner lateral and medial half from the central ridge.

RESULTS

The implant position was appropriate in all cases and clinical scores were not significantly different between the two groups. The post-operative dGEMRIC value of the outer medial half superficial zone in the NR group was significantly decreased compared with the pre-operation value (P<0.05), whereas T2 mapping was not significantly changed in all zones. The cartilage thickness of the outer zone was significantly thinner post-operatively (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that osteoarthritic changes in the outer zone of patella cartilage occurred 1 year after TKA.

LCS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Does the unresurfaced patella affect outcome? Survivorship at a minimum 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of a mobile-bearing TKA without patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

We assessed the outcomes in 503 patients (600 knees) who had cemented LCS (low contact stress) mobile bearing TKA without patellar resurfacing at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Clinical outcome scores and radiological assessment were used.

RESULTS

Four knees were revised, two had bearing dislocation and nine patients (1.5%) had secondary resurfacing for anterior knee pain. There were no radiolucent lines or osteolytic defects on radiographic evaluation. The overall survivorship was 97.8% with re-operation for any reason as the endpoint.

CONCLUSION

Non-resurfacing of the patella does not adversely affect the outcome of the LCS mobile bearing TKA at minimum 10 years follow-up.

The controversy of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: Ibisne in medio tutissimus?

Early arthroplasty designs were associated with a high level of anterior knee pain as they failed to cater for the patello-femoral joint. Patellar resurfacing was heralded as the saviour safeguarding patient satisfaction and success but opinion on its necessity has since deeply divided the scientific community and has become synonymous to topics of religion or politics. Opponents of resurfacing contend that the native patella provides better patellar tracking, improved clinical function, and avoids implant-related complications, whilst proponents argue that patients have less pain, are overall more satisfied, and avert the need for secondary resurfacing. The question remains whether complications associated with patellar resurfacing including those arising from future component revision outweigh the somewhat increased incidence of anterior knee pain recorded in unresurfaced patients. The current scientific literature, which is often affected by methodological limitations and observer bias, remains confusing as it provides evidence in support of both sides of the argument, whilst blinded satisfaction studies comparing resurfaced and non-resurfaced knees generally reveal equivalent results. Even national arthroplasty register data show wide variations in the proportion of patellar resurfacing between countries that cannot be explained by cultural differences alone. Advocates who always resurface or never resurface indiscriminately expose the patella to a random choice. Selective resurfacing offers a compromise by providing a decision algorithm based on a propensity for improved clinical success, whilst avoiding potential complications associated with unnecessary resurfacing. Evidence regarding the validity of selection criteria, however, is missing, and the decision when to resurface is often based on intuitive reasoning. Our lack of understanding why, irrespective of pre-operative symptoms and patellar resurfacing, some patients may suffer pain following TKA and others may not have so far stifled our efforts to make the strategy of selective resurfacing succeed. We should hence devote our efforts in defining predictive criteria and indicators that will enable us to reliably identify those individuals who might benefit from a resurfacing procedure. Level of evidence V.

[The third compartment in knee endoprosthetics: from denervation to replacement, which therapy is correct?]

Involvement of the patellofemoral compartment is common in osteoarthritis of the knee but to date there is no consensus as to the most appropriate approach concerning the patella. Both general non-selective resurfacing as well as selective or secondary resurfacing are currently accepted. However, despite abundant studies on the subject no clear conclusions can be drawn from the available evidence. There are arguments in favour of either approach. Accordingly, no strong evidence can be found to support peripatellar denervation. With the advent of new diagnostic modalities for the assessment of knee osteoarthritis, such as single photon emission computed tomography/CT (SPECT/CT), a more selective approach to patellar resurfacing with a potentially improved outcome might become possible.

Are current total knee arthroplasty implants designed to restore normal trochlear groove anatomy?

Biomechanical studies have shown that external rotation of the femoral TKA component improves patellar tracking but does not restore it to physiologic values. We hypothesized that this could be due to differences in the trochlear groove geometry of TKA and normal knees. This was investigated via a virtual TKA procedure that mounted femoral components on to 3-dimensional models of healthy femurs, followed by measurement of the trochlear geometry before and after the simulated TKA. The results showed that (1) external rotation of the component brought the trochlear groove closer to normal anatomy than no external rotation; (2) however, even with external rotation, the trochlear anatomy was only partially restored to normal. Further work is needed to determine implications for patellofemoral complications observed with current TKA designs.

Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty

Controversies existing over resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty remain in the literature. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE for published randomised clinical trials relevant to patellar resurfacing. The relative risk of reoperation was significantly lower for the patellar resurfacing group than for the nonresurfacing group (relative risk 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.84, P =0.004). The overall incidence of postoperative anterior knee pain of the 1,421 knees included was 12.9% in the patellar resurfacing group and 24.1% in the nonresurfacing group. The existing evidence indicates that patellar resurfacing can reduce the risk of reoperation with no improvement in postoperative knee function or patient satisfaction over total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Whether it can decrease the incidence of anterior knee pain remains uncertain.

Biomechanical consequences of patellar component medialization in total knee arthroplasty

The optimal amount of patellar component medialization in knee arthroplasty is unknown. We measured the impact, on patellofemoral kinematics and contact force distribution, of 0.0-, 2.5-, and 5.0-mm patellar component medialization in 7 cadaveric specimens implanted with knee arthroplasty components. The knees were flexed dynamically in a weight-bearing rig. Medialization led to lateral shift of the patellar bone, slight medial shift of the patellar component in the femoral groove, lateral tilt of the patella, reduced patellofemoral contact force in later flexion, and lateral shift of the center of pressure in early flexion. Effects on shift and tilt were proportional to the amount of medialization. As a result of this investigation, we recommend medializing the patellar component slightly-on the order of 2.5 mm.

Cruciate-retaining TKA using a third-generation system with a four-pegged tibial component: a minimum 10-year followup note

BACKGROUND

A third-generation TKA system was designed to address problems encountered with earlier designs including a high rate of patellofemoral complications. At a minimum of 5 years, we previously reported survivorship of 98.7% using revision for any reason as the endpoint for a cohort that includes the patients described in this report. That cohort was unique in that a tibial component that uses four short pegs for fixation was used in a subset of patients undergoing cruciate-retaining TKA and the tibial and femoral components were precoated with polymethylmethacrylate.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We now report the survival rate, postoperative function, complications, radiographic loosening, and osteolysis at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 161 patients who underwent 179 TKAs. The patella was resurfaced in all cases and all components were cemented. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically for evidence of component loosening and osteolysis. Forty of the 161 patients (with 44 TKAs) had died and eight patients (nine knees) were lost to followup. For the remaining 113 patients (126 knees), the minimum followup was 10 years (mean, 11.7 years; range, 10.0-13.9 years).

RESULTS

Survivorship at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively using revision for any reason and revision for aseptic loosening were 97.7% and 100%, respectively. Three knees were revised: one for infection, one for periprosthetic fracture, and one for postoperative arthrofibrosis. There were no reoperations for patellar component maltracking, wear or loosening, tibiofemoral polyethylene wear, osteolysis, or aseptic loosening. Hospital for Special Surgery scores improved from a mean of 47.7 (range, 23-78) preoperatively to 85.4 (range, 33-100).

CONCLUSIONS

This cruciate-retaining design had a low risk of implant failure or revision and the design changes eliminated the patellar failures seen with earlier iterations at up to 10 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Determinants of patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Optimizing patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty is a surgical priority. Despite this, a comparison of the effects of different component placements on patellar tracking is not available; the biomechanical impact of the patellar resection angle has not been studied; and the similarity between intraoperative and postoperative effects, fundamental to improving patellar tracking, is unknown. Our objective was to compare the impact of the major controllable femoral, tibial and patellar component positions on patellar kinematics during both passive and loaded flexion.

METHODS

We tested eight cadaveric knee specimens in two rigs, simulating intraoperative and weightbearing flexion. Optoelectronic marker arrays were attached to the femur, tibia and patella to record kinematics throughout the range of motion. We modified posterior-stabilized fixed-bearing knee components to allow for five types of variations in component placement in addition to the neutral position: femoral component rotation, tibial component rotation, patellar resection angle, patellar component medialization and additional patellar thickness, for a total of 11 individual variations.

FINDINGS

The major determinants of patellar tilt and shift were patellar component medialization, patellar resection angle and femoral component rotation. The relative order of these variables depended on the structure (bone or component), kinematic parameter (tilt or shift) and flexion angle (early or late flexion). Effects of component changes were consistent between the intraoperative and weightbearing rigs.

INTERPRETATION

To improve patellar tracking, and thereby the clinical outcome, surgeons should focus on patellar component medialization, patellar resection angle and femoral component rotation. These have been linked with anterior knee pain as well. Neither tibial component rotation nor patellar thickness should be adjusted to improve patellar tracking.