The results of the titanium-coated RM acetabular component at 20 years: a long-term follow-up of an uncemented primary total hip replacement

Bone support correlation of X-Ray and CT for a new PE-glenoid

INTRODUCTION

The radiographic evaluation of novel cementless anatomic polyethylene (PE) glenoid components featuring a titanium-coated back is still unclear. This study explores potential radiolucent lines (RLL) between the radiopaque titanium layer and sclerotic convex reamed bone in an intermodal comparison analysis with computed tomography (CT) scans.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight RM pressfit vitamys glenoids (Mathys®) were implanted into cadaveric scapulae. In the CT scans, glenoids were quantified by evaluating ideal complete bony support (NO GAP) and gap between bone and titanium coating (GAP). X-rays were in perfect 0-degree projection and tilted in ± 10° and ± 20° mediolateral (ml) and craniocaudal (cc) directions. Radiographs evaluated were graded as NO RLL, RLL (gap > 1 mm) or DL (double line, gap < 1 mm) in an intermodal comparison of CT and X-ray findings.

RESULTS

The inter-rater (Cohen's = 0.643) and intra-rater reliability (Cohen's = 0.714) were good. The overall evaluation showed a significant agreement between (NO) RLL on X-ray and (NO) GAP on CT (p < 0.001). The - 10-degree ml projection showed good agreement between CT and X-ray (Cohen's = 0.628). Adequate agreement was shown at 0 degrees (Cohen's = 0.386), + 10 degrees ml (Cohen's = 0.338), and + 20 degrees cc (Cohen's = 0.327). Compared to the scenario DL = NO RLL, the true a.p. view showed better sensitivity when the DL is classified as RLL. Conversely, the true a.p. view demonstrated both better specificity and significant agreement between the X-ray and CT findings in scenario when DL = No RLL.

CONCLUSION

Standard true a. p. projections are reliable in ruling out gaps when no RLL or DL is visible and the detection of RLL shows high intermodal agreement. Varying agreement across tilting angles emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive approach in evaluating bone support and CT is indispensable for a scientifically reliable assessment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III Treatment Study.

The RM Press fit cup™: an investigation in 182 hips at ten-year follow-up

INTRODUCTION

For over 10 years, the RM Pressfit cup™ has been used in our department. This is a one-piece, elastic, cementless implant designed with standard polyethylene (PE), covered with a thin coating of titanium particles. To date, there is no French study evaluating this cup after more than 10 years. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study in order to: (1) evaluate the survival of the implant with a minimum follow-up of 10 years, (2) evaluate the functional scores at the last follow-up, (3) measure the wear of the PE, (4) identify radiological loosening, (5) search for risk factors for cup removal, (6) identify complications that required management in the operating theatre.

HYPOTHESIS

The working hypothesis was that the survival of this implant was greater than 95% at 10 years' follow-up, in accordance with the criteria of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective monocentric study, including adult patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA) with an RM Pressfit cup™ (28 mm friction size) for coxarthrosis (primary or secondary) or femoral head osteonecrosis. Exclusion criteria were a follow-up period of less than 10 years, the placement of an RM Pressfit cup™ as a secondary intention for a THA (n = 5) or following a trochanteric fracture (n = 1). In total, 163 patients (182 hips) with a median age (Q1-Q3) of 63 (56-68) years, and a sex ratio (M/F) of 1.7 were included. Functional scores were evaluated using the Harris and Oxford scores. Radiographs were analyzed in the immediate postoperative period and at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 10.5 (10-11.5) years. Of the 182 included hips, 7 cups were removed, corresponding to a 10-year survival rate of 96.1% (95% CI [93.3; 96.9]). The median Harris and Oxford scores at 10.5 years were 95 (90-98) and 19 (17-23) points, respectively. The median PE wear rate was 0.058 (0.039-0.087) mm/year. Univariate analysis showed that male gender was associated with PE wear (OR = 3.6; 95% CI [1.3; 12.9] [p = 0.012]). Ten cups (6%) showed radiological instability with migration greater than 3 mm and/or variation in inclination greater than 8 °, and only 9 hips (6%) showed bone resorption. No preoperative or perioperative factors analyzed were associated with cup removal. Dislocation accounted for 71% (n = 5) of the causes of cup removal. Additionally, 6 hips experienced at least one dislocation episode requiring reduction by external maneuvers in the operating room, bringing the overall dislocation rate in the series to 6% (n = 11). Increased cup inclination was the only risk factor for prosthetic dislocation (OR = 1.2; 95% CI [1.09; 1.4] [p = 0.0003]). Overall complications requiring surgical intervention included 15 (8.3%) implanted cups (7 removed cups, 6 dislocation episodes requiring reduction by external maneuvers in the operating room, and 2 hips reoperated for washing and changing of mobile components due to early infection).

CONCLUSION

The RM Pressfit cup™ gives good long-term clinical and radiological results with an overall survival of 96.1% and a low complication rate over 10 years. Over the last 2 years the RM Vitamys™ cup has been introduced allowing the use of 32 mm femoral head diameter for size 48 cups, to reduce the risk of dislocation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective cohort.

Mid-term clinical outcomes of the uncemented Robert Mathys pressfit cup

BACKGROUND

The use of uncemented cups during total hip arthroplasty (THA) has gained popularity in recent years. The Robert Mathys (RM) pressfit cup, an uncemented monoblock implant is expected to preserve bone density due to its composition and external surface, while reducing backside wear with its monoblock construction. These factors should lead to a high survival rate of the implant.

AIM

To evaluate the mid-term survival and functional outcome of the RM Pressfit cup in a large study population.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2020, we included 1324 patients receiving a primary THA using the RM pressfit cup. Final clinical follow-up was performed at 2 years postoperatively with the Dutch arthroplasty register used to assess implant status thereafter. Revision for acetabular failure and reason for revision were reported to evaluate implant survival, while the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) scores were used to assess functional outcome.

RESULTS

The mean age at surgery was 64.9 years. The mean follow-up was 4.6 years. Of the 1324 THAs performed, 13 needed cup revisions within 5 years after index THA: 5 due to aseptic loosening, 6 due to infection, 2 due to dislocation and 2 due to other causes. This resulted in a 5-year cup survival of 98.8% (95%CI: 98.1-99.5). Nine of the cup revisions occurred within the first year after index THA. HOOS scores increased significantly in all domains during the first year and levelled out during the second year.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, the RM pressfit cup demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up; however, future studies are needed to assess the long-term outcomes of this acetabular implant.

Over ten-year follow-up results of a prospective and consecutive series of primary total hip arthroplasty with an original cementless total hip prosthesis

PURPOSE

High survival rates up to ten  years have been reported for non-cemented hip replacements. Publications beyond ten years have more diverse conclusions. To study the long-term survival of uncemented total hip replacement (THR), we examined a series of 125 THR, all with a minimum follow-up of ten  years.

METHODS

This is a prospective study of 203 patients operated for coxarthrosis between 2007 and 2011, by six senior surgeons. The original ellipsoidal stem and the impacted acetabulum were systematically cementless; the acetabulum had either a fixed ceramic or polyethylene insert, or a dual-mobility insert. At the date of the follow-up check, 44 patients were deceased and 34 patients were lost to follow-up. This left 125 complete files for our study.

RESULTS

They were a revision of the cup in four cases and a revision of the femoral stem in three cases (3.4%). The Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival rate of the THR, by considering revision for any reason as endpoint, at ten  years (120 months) is estimated at 96.6% (CI 92.7-98.7). Radiologically, on 86 analyses (68.8%) at ten  years and more reported, no significant evolution of the appearance of the cancellous bone around the acetabular cup was noted, nor any ossification. Some periprosthetic osteogenesis reactions were noted around the 1/3 distal but no periprosthetic edging.

CONCLUSION

In this minimum ten-year follow-up study, a cementless THR with a straight ellipsoidal cementless stem and a press-fit cup provides excellent implant survival and high patient satisfaction. (Clinically felt minimal difference.).

An isoelastic monoblock cup versus a modular metal-back cup: a matched-pair analysis of clinical and radiological results using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse software

INTRODUCTION

Bone preservation and long-term survival are the main challenges in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). A good bone stock is especially important for adequate anchorage of the cup in revision cases. However, the optimal acetabular cup design for preserving good bone stock is still unclear. We aimed to compare clinical outcome, radiological alterations, migration, and wear at mid-term for two different cup types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective matched-pair study was performed using the data for 98 THA cases treated with a monoblock cup composed of vitamin E-blended highly cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE; monoblock group) or a modular cup composed of a highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) without an antioxidant (modular group). Clinical results were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS). The obtained radiographs were analyzed for radiological alterations, migration, and wear using Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse (EBRA) software.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 73.2 ± 19.2 months (range: 32-108 months) and 60.5 ± 12.2 months (range: 20-84 months) in the monoblock and modular groups, respectively. HHS improved to 95.7 points in the monoblock group and 97.6 points in the modular group, without significant differences (p = 0.425). EBRA measurements were obtained in all cases. Acetabular bone alterations were not detected on radiological assessments. Mean cup migration was 1.67 ± 0.92 mm (range: 0.46-3.94 mm) and 1.24 ± 0.87 mm (range: 0.22-3.62 mm) in the monoblock and modular groups. The mean wear rate was 0.21 ± 0.18 mm (range: 0.00-0.70 mm) and 0.20 ± 0.13 mm (range: 0.00-0.50 mm) in the monoblock and modular groups. Both migration and wear pattern showed no significant differences (p = 0.741 and 0.243). None of the cases required revision surgery, yielding an implant survival rate of 100% in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The isoelastic press-fit monoblock VEPE cup and modular metal-back HXLPE cup showed equivalent mid-term wear and cup migration. Long-term studies are required to determine the effects of modularity, isoelasticity, and polyethylene stabilization with vitamin E on cup loosening and survival rates.

Forged to heal: The role of metallic cellular solids in bone tissue engineering

Metallic cellular solids, made of biocompatible alloys like titanium, stainless steel, or cobalt-chromium, have gained attention for their mechanical strength, reliability, and biocompatibility. These three-dimensional structures provide support and aid tissue regeneration in orthopedic implants, cardiovascular stents, and other tissue engineering cellular solids. The design and material chemistry of metallic cellular solids play crucial roles in their performance: factors such as porosity, pore size, and surface roughness influence nutrient transport, cell attachment, and mechanical stability, while their microstructure imparts strength, durability and flexibility. Various techniques, including additive manufacturing and conventional fabrication methods, are utilized for producing metallic biomedical cellular solids, each offering distinct advantages and drawbacks that must be considered for optimal design and manufacturing. The combination of mechanical properties and biocompatibility makes metallic cellular solids superior to their ceramic and polymeric counterparts in most load bearing applications, in particular under cyclic fatigue conditions, and more in general in application that require long term reliability. Although challenges remain, such as reducing the production times and the associated costs or increasing the array of available materials, metallic cellular solids showed excellent long-term reliability, with high survival rates even in long term follow-ups.

Aseptic loosening of tumor prostheses in distal femur after revision surgery: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Tumor prostheses of the distal femur after revision surgery is associated with high rates of aseptic loosening, which has introduced great challenges to the survival of patients, but only a few studies have evaluated their X-ray imaging. The purpose of this study was to analyze the risk factors for recurrence of aseptic loosening and make recommendations to reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening after revision surgery of tumor prostheses in the distal femur.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was performed on 23 patients who had revision surgery for distal femur prostheses due to aseptic loosening between June 2002 and June 2021. They were divided into two groups based on the condition of the prostheses after revision surgery: loosening group (9 patients) and control group (14 patients). Following the initial replacement, the length and diameter of the prosthetic intramedullary stem were measured through the standard full-length anteroposterior X-ray imaging of both lower limbs. The osteotomy length, femoral length and diameter, femoral intramedullary stem diameter, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and so on were measured as well. Following that, statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Patients in the loosening group had statistically significant differences in the ratio of prostheses length to femur length (71.89 ± 6.62) and the ratio of intramedullary stem diameter to femoral diameter (25.50 ± 6.90) (P < 0.05), when compared to the control group. The HKAA (175.58 ± 2.78), mLDFA (94.42 ± 2.57), and the deviation angle between the lower limb alignment and the tibial prostheses force line (2.23 ± 1.09) in the loosening group were significantly different from those in the control group (P < 0.05) on postoperative radiographs of the entire length of the lower limbs. The lowest score in intramedullary manubrium I indicated less osteolysis, while the highest score in intramedullary manubrium III indicated the most serious osteolysis, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the use of longer and thicker intramedullary stems can effectively decrease the occurrence of aseptic loosening. Additionally, it is important to avoid using the original prostheses and reconstruct the standard line of lower limb force to further reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening. It is crucial to closely monitor the distal segment of the intramedullary stem for osteolysis after surgery.

The 45-year evolution of the Mathys RM monoblock cups: have the paradigm shifts been worthwhile?

INTRODUCTION

The Robert Mathys (RM) monoblock uncemented cup is a design less commonly used in primary total hip replacement. It's purported advantages over modular cemented cups are: (1) its modulus of elasticity approximating bone, thus mimicking load transmission and the biomechanical behaviour of the cup to better match stresses on the acetabulum, leading to bone-preservation; and (2) as a 1-piece cup there is absence of a mobile interface between a liner and shell, preventing backside wear. Since its inception in 1983 there have been 3 major design changes: the RM Classic, the RM Pressfit, and the RM Vitamys with the most modern polyethylene (vitamin E).

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study of the New Zealand Joint Registry, all designs of RM acetabular cup were reviewed. Data were included from1998 to 2018. All-cause revision rates, reasons for revision and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were assessed.

RESULTS

In total 13,272 acetabular cups were included. The all-cause revision rates did not differ between the designs. Revision rates for aseptic loosening in the RM Vitamys were lower, but the follow-up was shorter and more larger heads were used. There was no difference in the OHS.

CONCLUSION

All implant designs were safe. The use of larger heads led to a decrease in revisions due to dislocation. It has to be waited out whether the RM Vitamys performs superior in the long-term due to the highly cross-linked polyethylene.

Failure of Screw/Shell Interface in the Trident II Acetabular System in Total Hip Arthroplasty

We report a case series of 2 patients with screw/shell interface failure in the Stryker Trident II Acetabular System. Both failures consisted of screw penetration through the Trident II acetabular shell. One failure was observed postoperatively after a revision from a cephalomedullary nail to a total hip arthroplasty while the other was observed intraoperatively during a primary total hip arthroplasty. Both component failures were managed conservatively with weight-bearing as tolerated and radiographic monitoring. These are the first reported cup/screw failures of the Stryker Trident II system and should raise awareness of the potential complication and implant design flaw. When placing acetabular screws, we recommend obtaining intraoperative orthogonal screw radiographs that are tangential to the shell surface to assess for screw/shell failure.

Survival of monoblock RM vitamys compared with modular PINNACLE cups: mid-term outcomes of 200 hips performed by a single surgeon

INTRODUCTION

Monoblock cups have theoretical advantages over modular cups; however, their superiority in terms of survival has not been confirmed in comparative studies.

METHODS

We compared the mid-term survivorship of 107 RM Pressfit vitamys monoblock cups (Mathys Ltd., Bettlach, Switzerland) with 93 modular pressfit Pinnacle cups (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN, USA). All cases were registered in the Arthroplasty Registry Thessaloniki and performed by a senior surgeon through the same approach between 2013 and 2014. The groups were comparable in sex distribution, preoperative diagnosis, follow-up, cup diameter, head diameter, type and use of screws, HOOS and HSS preop scores; the recipients of RM cup were significantly younger.

RESULTS

3 sockets were revised. The 6-year survival for any reason was 99.1% for the RM and 97.8 % for the PINNACLE group. There was no difference in survival for aseptic loosening and any reason between groups (log-rank test p = 0.921 and p = 0.483, respectively). The age (95% CI, 0.79-1.1), sex (95% CI, 0.2-45.0), cup diameter (95% CI, 0.18-1.1), head diameter (95% CI, 0.004-6.2), preoperative diagnosis and use of screws (95% CI, 0.02-4.3), did not influence hazard ratio for revision between groups. HHS and HOOS were comparable at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that both cup designs had similar revision rates at mid-term follow-up, regardless the fact that the RM vitamys was used in a cohort of younger patients; which according to the literature would have led to earlier failures. Further long-term data are needed to evaluate the superiority of RM vitamys in the clinical setting, especially in the young.

An Isoelastic Monoblock Cup Retains More Acetabular and Femoral Bone Than a Modular Press-Fit Cup: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

For cup revision after total hip arthroplasty, sufficiently good periacetabular bone stock is a prerequisite for fixation of the revision implant. Cementless cups can lead to a relevant reduction of peri-implant bone mineral density (BMD) through stress-shielding.

METHODS

Fifty patients were included in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Group 1 (RM group) received an isoelastic monoblock cup (RM Pressfit vitamys; Mathys). Group 2 (IT group) received a modular titanium cup (Allofit-S IT Alloclassic with a polyethylene liner; Zimmer). Periacetabular BMD was determined and subdivided into 4 regions of interest by dual x-ray absorptiometry at 1 week (baseline) and at 4 years postoperatively. Our primary outcome was reduction in periacetabular BMD.

RESULTS

Periacetabular BMD was reduced by an average of 15.1% in the RM group and 16.5% in the IT group at 4 years postoperatively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups over the periacetabular structure as a whole. However, the decrease of BMD in the polar region was significantly different in the RM group (4.9% ± 10.0%) compared with the IT group (15.9% ± 14.9%, p = 0.005). Use of the isoelastic RM cup showed significantly less bone loss than the modular IT cup.

CONCLUSIONS

Relevant loss of BMD at 4 years after surgery was identified in the periacetabular region in both groups. No differences between the 2 cup systems were found when looking at the overall periacetabular region. As a secondary outcome, less postoperative periacetabular bone loss occurred in the polar region when an isoelastic cup was used. Longer follow-up is required to allow for conclusions to be drawn about the long-term course of the 2 cup systems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Long-Term Outcomes of 496 Anatomical Cementless Modular Femoral Stems: Eleven to Twenty Years of Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study is to assess the long-term outcomes of this specific stem (anatomical cementless modular stem ESOP), to review the survivorship, complication rate, and radiographic and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Descriptive and analytical retrospective longitudinal observational study of patients was operated on total hip arthroplasty between 1998 and 2007. Four hundred ninety-six prostheses corresponding to 447 patients were reviewed, mean age was 65.8 years (standard deviation [SD] ±11.6 years), and median follow-up time was 13.4 years (range 1-20). The most used cups were cementless (75.8%). The most frequent friction pairs were metal-polyethylene (53.1%) and ceramic-polyethylene (24.2%). Main variables analyzed were stem survival, subsidence, coronal orientation, osteolysis, reintervention, and Oxford Hip Score.

RESULTS

From 496 implants, there were 22 lost to follow-up (4.4%). Stem revision was performed in 51 patients: 26 periprosthetic joint infections (2-stage revision), 16 periprosthetic fractures, and 8 one-stage revisions (6 real aseptic loosening with negative culture after revision). The stem survivorship at more than 15 years for any reason was 89.2% and for aseptic loosening 97.97%. No specific complications were found due to modularity. The mean subsidence and orientation was 2.06 mm (SD ±5.11 mm) and 0.41° varus (SD ±2.20°) respectively. Subsidence >5 mm or varus >5° was associated with a higher revision rate. Osteolysis was found in 110 patients (zone I = 79, VII = 57), associated with zirconium-polyethylene, without relationship to the stem revision rate or Oxford Hip Score.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this study represents the largest series of this stem, revealing an excellent survival rate and long-term clinical outcomes similar to the best results of classical cementless stems published in the literature.

Wear and migration are not influenced by head size in a vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular cup

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening and periprosthetic osteolysis are frequent complications in total hip arthroplasty requiring revision surgery. Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) implants have improved wear resistance, permitting larger femoral heads. However, such implants may experience surface cracking, mechanical failure, and oxidative damage. Vitamin E-infused HXLPE (VEPE) implants were therefore developed to reduce oxidation without compromising mechanical strength. We addressed the following questions: (1) Does femoral head size affect the midterm annual polyethylene wear rates of VEPE acetabular cups? (2) Does femoral head size affect the midterm migration rates of VEPE acetabular cups? (3) Are clinical outcomes affected by femoral head size?

HYPOTHESIS

Annual wear rate, migration rate, and clinical outcomes of VEPE acetabular cups are independent of femoral head size.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients that underwent total hip arthroplasty. Hips were grouped according to the size of femoral head implanted (28 mm, 32 mm, and 36 mm). We determined annual wear rate and migration rate of VEPE acetabular cups using the Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse software. Clinically, we assessed the Harris Hip Score and visual analog score for pain and satisfaction.

RESULTS

We followed 253 patients (267 hips) for a mean of 55.0±20.6 months in the 28 mm, 46.2±21.4 months in the 32 mm, and 43.8±22.6 months in the 36 mm group. The annual wear rate was 0.025 mm per year from 1 year to the last follow-up and remained similar between the groups (p>0.05). Also, mean two-dimensional migration rates did not exceed 0.05 mm from 2 years to the last follow-up and remained similar between the groups (p=0.355). Finally, clinical outcomes also did not differ between the groups (p>0.05). Two patients required revision surgery.

DISCUSSION

Femoral head size did not influence midterm annual wear rate, migration rate, and clinical outcomes of VEPE acetabular cups. Furthermore, wear and cup migration rates were below the reported values leading to osteolysis and aseptic loosening. Nevertheless, studies with extended follow-up periods will be necessary to confirm these results in the long term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The concept of a cementless isoelastic monoblock cup made of highly cross-linked polyethylene infused with vitamin E: radiological analyses of migration and wear using EBRA and clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up

Background

The newest generation of cementless titanium-coated, isoelastic monoblock cup with vitamin E-blended highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) was introduced to the market in 2009. The aim of the present study was to obtain mid-term follow-up data including migration and wear analyses.

Methods

This prospective study investigated 101 primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) cases in 96 patients treated at a single institution. Patients were allowed full weight-bearing on the first day postoperatively. Harris hip score (HHS) and pain and satisfication on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were assessed at a mean follow-up of 79.0 months. Migration and wear were assessed using Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse (EBRA) software. Radiological acetabular bone alterations and complications were documented.

Results

At mid-term follow-up (mean 79.0 months, range: 51.8–101.7), 81 cases with complete clinical and radiological data were analyzed. Utilisable EBRA measurements were obtained for 42 hips. The mean HHS was 91.1 (range 38.0–100.0), VAS satisfaction was 9.6 (range 6.0–10.0), VAS rest pain was 0.2 (range 0.0–4.0), and VAS load pain was 0.6 (range 0.0–9.0). Mean migration was 0.86 mm (range: 0.0–2.56) at 24 months and 1.34 mm (range: 0.09–3.14) at 5 years, and the mean annual migration rate was 0.22 (range: − 0.24–1.34). The mean total wear was 0.4 mm (range: 0.03–1.0), corresponding to a mean annual wear rate of 0.06 mm per year (range: 0.0–0.17). Radiographic analysis did not reveal any cases of osteolysis, and no revision surgeries had to be performed.

Conclusions

After using vitamin-E blended HXLPE in cementless isoelastic monoblock cups, there were no obvious signs of osteolysis or aseptic loosening occurred. No patients required revision surgery after mid-term follow-up. Cup migration and wear values were well below the benchmarks considered predictive for potential future failure.

Trial registration

The trial registration number on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04322916 (retrospectively registered at 26.03.2020).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-03981-8.

Cemented or uncemented acetabular fixation in combination with the Exeter Universal cemented stem

AIMS

To compare long-term survival of all-cemented and hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Exeter Universal stem.

METHODS

Details of 1,086 THAs performed between 1999 and 2005 using the Exeter stem and either a cemented (632) or uncemented acetabular component (454) were collected from local records and the New Zealand Joint Registry. A competing risks regression survival analysis was performed with death as the competing risk with adjustments made for age, sex, approach, and bearing.

RESULTS

There were 61 revisions (9.7%; 0.82 revisions/100 observed component years, (OCYs)) in the all-cemented group and 18 (4.0%; 0.30/100 OCYs) in the hybrid group. The cumulative incidence of revision at 18 years was 12.1% for cemented and 5.2% for hybrids. There was a significantly greater risk of revision for all-cemented compared with hybrids (unadjusted sub-hazard ratio (SHR) 2.44; p = 0.001), and of revision for loosening, wear, or osteolysis (unadjusted SHR 3.77; p < 0.001). After adjustment, the increased risk of all-cause revision did not reach significance at age 70 years and above. The advantage for revision for loosening, wear, and osteolysis remained at all ages.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the use of uncemented acetabular fixation when used in combination with the Exeter stem with improved survivorship for revision for aseptic loosening, wear, and osteolysis at all ages and for all-cause revision in patients less than 70 years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):414-422.

The Survivorship of the Uncemented Iso-Elastic Monoblock Acetabular Component at a Mean of 6-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening, caused by wear and osteolysis, is the most frequent reason for hip replacement revision in the UK. To prevent aseptic loosening, an acetabular component with vitamin E added to irradiated highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) was developed to reduce oxidative degradation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

A prior study of the vitamin E-blended HXLPE acetabular component after 2 years of follow-up reported no adverse reactions or abnormal mechanical behavior. To further examine this hypothesis of reducing wear and osteolysis, we sought to evaluate outcomes after 6-year follow-up.

METHODS

A cohort of 95 of the 112 initial patients (84.2%) completed the 6 years of follow-up after receiving a vitamin E-blended HXLPE acetabular component. Evaluation was performed in terms of clinical (visual analog scale [VAS] score, VAS score with weight-bearing, VAS score for satisfaction, and Harris Hip Score) and radiological (inclination, polar gap, radiolucencies, migration, and 2-D linear femoral head penetration rate) assessment.

RESULTS

The mean VAS score for patient satisfaction was 8.75 and the mean Harris Hip Score was 91.8. There were two revisions because of deep infections and one because of a peri-prosthetic femoral fracture. Two acetabular components migrated initially; however, delayed acetabular stabilization occurred. Both patients had good clinical scores at 72 months. The mean femoral head penetration rate was 0.036 mm/year.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective cohort study has shown no adverse reactions concerning the vitamin E additive, promising wear rates, no signs of osteolysis, a 100% survival rate for aseptic loosening, and an all-cause survivorship percentage of 97.4% at 6 years of follow-up.

Hybrid Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Showed Improved Survival Over Cemented and Uncemented Fixation: A Single-Center Survival Analysis of 2156 Hips at 12-18 Years

BACKGROUND

Despite increased use of uncemented and hybrid fixation, there is little evidence of their superiority over cemented implants. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term survivorship of cemented, hybrid and uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) at varying ages.

METHODS

A total of 2156 hips (1315 cemented, 324 uncemented, and 517 hybrid) were performed in a single center between 1999 and 2005 with follow-up through to 2017. Registry and local databases were used to determine revision rates and cause. Unadjusted and adjusted competing risk survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of all-cause revision at 18 years was cemented 10.9%, uncemented 8.9%, and hybrid 6.5%. Cemented fixation had a statistically significant higher risk of all-cause revision than hybrid in the adjusted model for all ages to 65 years (subhazard ratios [SHRs], 2.28-4.67) and a higher risk of revision for loosening, wear, or osteolysis at all ages (SHRs, 3.25-6.07). Uncemented fixation showed no advantage over hybrid fixation at any age, but did show advantages over cemented at younger ages (≤60 years) for all-cause revision (SHRs, 2.3-4.3).

CONCLUSION

Hybrid fixation with conventional polyethylene shows an advantage over cemented hips at all ages. Uncemented THA showed improved survival over cemented only at younger ages and no advantage over hybrid THA.

Texture analysis of trabecular bone around RM-Pressfit cementless acetabulum in a series of 46 patients during a 5 year period

BACKGROUND

Cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common procedure producing excellent clinical results. Their long-term survival is nevertheless burdened by loosening of the acetabular part caused by changes in the distribution of strains around the cup. In this context the RM-Pressfit® cup has been developed, resulting in a more harmonious distribution of the strains.

HYPOTHESIS

Texture analysis of X-ray films can evaluate the evolution of trabecular bone micro-architecture during the five years following THA with a RM-Pressfit® cup.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A monocentric series of 46 hips was reviewed regularly within five years post- surgery. Radiographic evaluation of the operated hip was done on frontal digitized radiographs of the pelvis to follow evolution of bone micro-architecture in the #2 zone of De Lee and Charnley. Texture analysis using fractal algorithms was done at D0, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years post-THA. The fractal methods used included the skyscrapers and the dynamic blanket methods with 3 different structuring elements (a cross, a horizontal and a vertical vector).

RESULTS

The RM-Pressfit® caused significant changes in the distribution of strains around the acetabulum that preserved the bone volume over a 5-year period post-surgery. This corresponds to an improvement of the trabecular micro-architecture around the acetabular cups.

CONCLUSION

A statistically significant increase in the four fractal dimensions considered corresponded to an improved trabecular bone micro-architecture revealed by texture analysis, a non-invasive method that can be used on digitized X-ray images.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IIIb, Case control study, retrospective design.

Long-Term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty with RM Classic Cups

Relevance. The RM Classic monoblock titanium-coated polyethylene cup is widely used in the total hip arthroplasty. However, so far in Russia there has been no analysis of follow-up over 10 years for a limited number of patients in a single hospital. The aim of the study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of total hip replacement with RM Classic acetabular component. Materials and Methods. The outcomes of 328 total hip arthroplasties (289 patients operated in the period from 1997 to 2007) with RM Classic cups were evaluated in a monocentral retrospective clinical study. The average follow-up period was 14.4 years. Revision procedure due to aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear or osteolysis was considered as the end point of the study. Results. 9 revisions during the short and medium follow-up periods (up to 10 years) were associated with malpositioning of RM Classic components and errors in surgical technique. The indications for later revision THA (19 cases) were polyethylene wear and aseptic loosening. Only in one case they were combined with pelvic bone osteolysis with the formation of III a defect according to W.G. Paprosky classification. Within 15 years the Kaplan-Meier survivorship of RM Classic cup was 92.5%. There was a statistically significant difference of the survival curves in the ceramic-on-poly against metal-on-poly bearings: 94.9% and 79.4%, respectively. The average Harris Hip Score was 88.6. Conclusion. RM Classic uncemented monoblock cup has proven its high efficiency and survival in 15 years follow-up period and over.

Mid-term results of an uncemented tapered femoral stem and various factors affecting survivorship

OBJECTIVE

CLS stem is commonly used today in primary hip arthroplasty, but only a few studies have evaluated their outcome in young high demanding patients. In Indian scenario, many patients require squatting and sitting cross-legged as part of their daily activities placing excessive load on the joint. We evaluated (I) Mid-long term functional and radiological results (II) Influence of age, gender, diagnosis, stem alignment, Canal fill index (CFI) on the outcome (III) Kaplan-Meier survivorship using revision for any reason or for aseptic loosening as an endpoint.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of 64 THA in 54 patients operated between July 2000 to July 2011 using CLS stem was done. Mean follow-up was 10.3 years (5-14.9 years) with 5 patients lost to follow-up and 4 patients died. Mean age at surgery was 46.8 years (18-78 years).

RESULTS

Mean Harris hip score was 89.4 (72-100). Thigh pain was present in 4 hips which were not associated with the sizing of the stem (p = .489). Stable fixation by bony ingrowth was seen in 53 hips (96.4%) and by fibrous ingrowth in 2 cases (3.6%) with no case of loosening seen. Stress shielding was seen as Grade II in 17 hips (30.9%), Grade III in 3 hips (5.4%). Pedestal formation was seen in 9 hips (16.4%) which were statistically associated with varus alignment and CFI < 80. No stem revision was performed with stem survivorship of 100%.

CONCLUSION

The mid-term survival rates and good clinical-radiological outcomes of CLS stem in high demanding Indian population were excellent.

Stability of small pegs for cementless implant fixation

Most glenoid implants rely on large centrally located fixation features to avoid perforation of the glenoid vault in its peripheral regions. Upon revision of such components there may not be enough bone left for the reinsertion of an anatomical prosthesis. Multiple press-fit small pegs would allow for less bone resection and strong anchoring in the stiffer and denser peripheral subchondral bone. This study assessed the fixation characteristics, measured as the push-in (P_in ) and pull-out (P_out ) forces, and spring-back, measured as the elastic displacement immediately after insertion, for five different small press-fitted peg configurations manufactured out of UHMWPE cylinders (5 mm diameter and length). A total of 16 specimens for each configuration were tested in two types of solid bone substitute: Hard (40 PCF, 0.64 g/cm³ , worst-case scenario of P_in ) and soft (15 PCF, 0.24 g/cm³ , worst-case scenario of spring-back and P_out ). Two different diametric interference-fits were studied. Geometries with lower stiffness fins (large length to width aspect ratio) were the best performing designs in terms of primary fixation stability. They required the lowest force to fully seat, meaning they are less damaging to the bone during implantation, while providing the highest P_out /P_in ratio, indicating that when implanted they provide the strongest anchoring for the glenoid component. It is highlighted that drilling of chamfered holes could minimize spring-back displacements. These findings are relevant for the design of implants press-fitted pegs because primary fixation has been shown to be an important factor in achieving osseointegration and longevity of secondary fixation. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2765-2772, 2017.

Survivorship of a Porous Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular Component in Primary Hip Arthroplasty With a Mean Follow-Up of 18 Years

BACKGROUND

The use of porous tantalum for the acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has demonstrated excellent short-term and midterm results. However, long-term data are scarce. The purpose of this prospective study is to report the long-term clinical and radiologic outcome following use of an uncemented porous tantalum acetabular component in primary THA with a minimum follow-up of 17.5 years, in a previously studied cohort of patients.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 128 consecutive primary THAs in 140 patients, between November 1997 and June 1999. A press-fit porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component was used in all cases. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of 18.1 years (range, 17.5-19 years).

RESULTS

Mean age of patients at the time of operation was 60.4 years. Harris hip score, Oxford hip score, and range of motion were dramatically improved in all cases (P < .001). At last follow-up, all cups were radiographically stable with no evidence of migration, gross polyethylene wear, progressive radiolucencies, osteolytic lesions, or acetabular fractures. The survivorship with reoperation for any reason as end point was 92.8% and the survivorship for aseptic loosening as an end point was 100%.

CONCLUSION

The porous tantalum monoblock cup in primary THA demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes with no failures because of aseptic loosening at a mean follow-up of 18.1 years.

Risk factors for unsuccessful acetabular press-fit fixation at primary total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Surgeon at primary total hip arthroplasty sometimes cannot achieve sufficient cementless acetabular press-fit fixation and must resort to other fixation methods. Despite a predominant use of cementless cups, this issue is not fully clarified, therefore we performed a large retrospective study to: (1) identify risk factors related to patient or implant or surgeon for unsuccessful intraoperative press-fit; (2) check for correlation between surgeons' volume of operated cases and the press-fit success rate.

HYPOTHESIS

Unsuccessful intra-operative press-fit more often occurs in older female patients, particular implants, due to learning curve and low-volume surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective observational cohort of prospectively collected intraoperative data (2009-2016) included all primary total hip arthroplasty patients with implant brands that offered acetabular press-fit fixation only. Press-fit was considered successful if acetabulum was of the same implant brand as the femoral component without additional screws or cement. Logistic regression models for unsuccessful acetabular press-fit included patients' gender/age/operated side, implant, surgeon, approach (posterior n=1206, direct-lateral n=871) and surgery date (i.e. learning curve).

RESULTS

In 2077 patients (mean 65.5 years, 1093 females, 1163 right hips), three different implant brands (973 ABG-II™-Stryker, 646 EcoFit™ Implantcast, 458 Procotyl™ L-Wright) were implanted by eight surgeons. Their unsuccessful press-fit fixation rates ranged from 3.5% to 23.7%. Older age (odds ratio 1.01 [95% CI: 0.99-1.02]), female gender (2.87 [95% CI: 2.11-3.91]), right side (1.44 [95% CI: 1.08-1.92]), surgery date (0.90 [95% CI: 1.08-1.92]) and particular implants were significant risk factors only in three surgeons with less successful surgical technique (higher rates of unsuccessful press-fit with Procotyl™-L and EcoFit™ [P=0.01]). Direct-lateral hip approach had a lower rate of unsuccessful press-fit than posterior hip approach (P<0.01), but there was no correlation between surgeons' volume and rate of successful press-fit (Spearman's rho=0.10, P=0.82). Subcohort of 961 patients with 5-7-years follow-up indicated higher early/late cup revision rates with unsuccessful press-fit.

DISCUSSION

Success of press-fit fixation depends entirely on the surgeon and surgical approach. With proper operative technique, the unsuccessful press-fit fixation rate should be below 5% and the impact of patients' characteristics or implants on press-fit fixation is then insignificant. Findings of huge variability in operative technique between surgeons of the presented study emphasize the need for surgeon-specific data stratification in arthroplasty studies and indicate the possibility of false attribution of clinically observed phenomena to patient-related factors in pooled data of large centers or hip arthroplasty registers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective observational case control study.

Long-term results of total hip arthroplasty with the CementLess Spotorno (CLS) system

BACKGROUND

This study presents the long-term results of the Cementless Spotorno (CLS) total hip arthroplasty system and an analysis of factors associated with clinical and radiographic outcome.

METHODS

We studied a series of 120 consecutive CLS arthroplasties in a young patient group (mean age at surgery: 55.9 ± 5.9 years). The Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score, polyethylene (PE) wear, and radiographic status were recorded during follow-up. Survival analyses, repeated-measures analysis of variance, and a nested case-control study were used for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 14.6 years (range 0.1-24.2 years, including revisions and lost to follow-up), 24 revisions had been performed, 16 of which for aseptic cup loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 24-year survival of 72.8% (95% CI, 63.0%-82.6%) with revision for any reason as endpoint, and 80.1% (95% CI, 70.9%-89.3%) for revision for aseptic cup loosening. Mean final Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score was 16.1 points (range 7-18). Mean PE wear at final follow-up was 2.3 mm (range 0.6-6.8 mm). A higher rate of PE wear was associated with better clinical scores but also with revision for cup loosening. Factors associated with more PE wear were: younger age at surgery; 32 - mm head; longer follow-up; and steeper inclination angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Beyond 10 years, the CLS stem is reliable, but the high revision rate for aseptic cup loosening is concerning, specifically with better performing (cementless) alternatives available.

The Morscher Press-Fit Acetabular Component: An Independent Long-Term Review at 18-22 Years

BACKGROUND

There are relatively few 20-year results of uncemented acetabular components, and most of these are modular designs. This study reports the 20-year results of a monoblock press-fit acetabular component.

METHODS

A total of 122 total hip arthroplasties (111 patients) using the Morscher cup were reviewed at a mean of 19.7 years. The average age at implantation was 57.3 years (range, 36-74 years), and 81 (66%) were men.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (25 hips) had died. Seven hips were revised, including 5 acetabular revisions. Six patients (6 hips) declined to participate but were known not to have been revised. The mean Oxford hip score was 41.1 (range, 22-48), and the mean reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score was 5.7/48 (range, 0-24). Eccentric wear was seen in 13 (15.7%) and major osteolysis in 14 (17%) of 82 surviving hips with radiographs. The all-cause revision rate was 0.32 per 100 observed component years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.66). The 20-year Kaplan-Meier survival was 93.4% (CI, 86.6-96.8) for all-cause revisions, 95.5% (CI, 89.4-98.1) for any acetabular revision, and 97.1% (CI, 91.2-99.1) for acetabular aseptic loosening, wear, or osteolysis.

CONCLUSION

The Morscher acetabular component has continued to perform well at 20 years despite using conventional polyethylene with results that match or surpass other cementless acetabulae.

The RM Pressfit vitamys: 5-year Swiss experience of the first 100 cups

BACKGROUND

The RM Pressfit vitamys is a titanium particle-coated monoblock cup with vitamin E stabilised highly cross-linked polyethylene. Initial fixation is achieved via press-fit with subsequent stability by bone on-growth. This is the first study to report the 5-year results of this design.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study according to STROBE guidelines of 100 consecutive total hip replacements (THRs) in 92 patients all with ceramic heads. Demographic data, pre/postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction, Harris Hip Scores (HHS) and complications were recorded. Radiographic analysis of osteolysis and loosening was complemented by EBRA (Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse) evaluation of cup movement.

RESULTS

Our cohort comprised 48 women (mean age 67; SD 10.4) and 44 men (mean age 69; SD 7.8). The mean body mass index was 27 kg/m2 (SD 4.6). Surgical indications were osteoarthritis 96%, avascular necrosis 3% and fracture 1%. 82% had a direct anterior approach, 15% anterolateral and 3% trans-gluteal. 4 surgeons were involved. 1 cup was repositioned and fixed with screws within a week of index surgery. There were 2 intraoperative femoral fractures, 3 haematomata with 1 requiring drainage and 1 deep infection settling with an open washout and modular exchange. Mean VAS satisfaction increased from 3.8 (SD 2.0) to 8.8 at 6 weeks (SD 1.4) and 9.5 (SD 1.3) at 5 years. The HHS functional scores were 58.9 (SD 13.2) preoperatively and 94.6 (SD 6.6) at 5 years. Radiographic analysis showed neither progressive radiolucency nor osteolysis. Mean migration was 1.5 mm after 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Mid-term results of the RM Pressfit vitamys cup are encouraging.

Short to Midterm Follow-Up of the Tritanium Primary Acetabular Component: A Cause for Concern

BACKGROUND

Several acetabular components utilizing novel ultraporous metal substrates have been introduced over the past decade. Collectively by design, they have a lower modulus of elasticity to reduce stress shielding, a higher coefficient of friction to enhance interference fit, and ultraporous surfaces to enhance osseointegration. However, little literature exists regarding their clinical performance.

METHODS

This study compared the clinical and radiographic results of 109 hips in 95 patients using a Tritanium primary cup (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) to an age, body mass index, and gender-matched cohort of 100 patients that received a contemporary cup (Stryker Trident PSL HA).

RESULTS

At an average 4.24 + 1.49 years, implant survivorship of the Tritanium primary cup was 98.2%, with 2 cups revised for failure of osseointegration. One-year radiographs revealed radiolucent and radiosclerotic lines in 2 or more DeLee zones in 30.3% of cups and 3 zone involvement in 8.2%. These proportions increased (40.0% and 17.1%, respectively) at minimum 5-year follow-up. A comparison of 1 year and last follow-up radiographs revealed progression in 13.8%. Tritanium primary components with radiolucency in 2 or more zones exhibited significantly lower HHS at 2 years compared to all Trident peripheral self-locking (PSL) components (P < .0001) and Tritanium primary components with 1 zone or no radiolucency (P = .026). Scanning electron microscopy of a retrieved cup revealed local inflammatory reaction and no evidence of osseointegration.

CONCLUSION

Despite adequate implant survivorship, over one third of Tritanium primary cups had 2 or more zone radiolucency at minimum 5-year follow-up with associated lower Harris hip scores.

Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Porous Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular Component in Primary Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

The porous tantalum monoblock cup has demonstrated excellent short-term and midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes in primary THA, but longer follow-up is necessary to confirm the durability of these results into the second decade. The purpose of this study is to report the clinical and radiographic outcomes for this monoblock cup with a minimum 15-year follow-up.

METHODS

From June 1998 to December 1999, 61 consecutive patients (63 hips) underwent primary THA with a tantalum monoblock acetabular component. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a minimum of 15 years. At a mean of 15.6 years (range, 15-16 years) of follow-up, 5 patients had died, and 4 had been lost to follow-up, leaving 52 patients (54 hips) for analysis. The underlying diagnosis that led to the primary THA was primary osteoarthritis in 43 hips, avascular necrosis in 4, developmental hip dysplasia in 3, rheumatoid arthritis in 3 and post-traumatic osteoarthritis in 1.

RESULTS

One cup was revised for deep infection; at surgery, the cup showed osseointegration. At a mean follow-up of 15.6 years (range, 15-16 years), the survivorship with cup revision for aseptic loosening as end point was 100%. There was no radiographic evidence of loosening, migration, or gross polyethylene wear at last follow-up. The mean Harris Hip Scores improved from 47 points preoperatively to 94 points.

CONCLUSION

The porous tantalum monoblock cup in primary THA demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes with no failures because of osteolysis or loosening at a minimum follow-up of 15 years.

RM Pressfit® cup: good preliminary results at 5 to 8 years follow-up for 189 patients

AIM

The RM Classic® cup shows very good results. The RM Pressfit® cup has an equatorial pressfit; it is a monoblock implant without metalback. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the survival of this implant, monitoring patients for at least 5 years in all consecutive cases operated in our centre.

METHODS

Between February 2006 and December 2008, our department performed 189 consecutive nonselected primary total hip arthroplasties using the RM® Pressfit cup, and all of these were included in the study. The operative technique involved an anterolateral approach. The latest follow-up evaluation was performed at a minimum of 5 years after the index arthroplasty.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 6.5 years (5-8 years). We had preoperative information for 186 of the 189 patients. 102 patients were seen in consultation (54.0%), 46 (24.3%) patients were contacted by phone, 37 (19.6%) patients died, and 4 patients (2.1%) were lost for unknown reasons. Of the 189 arthroplasties, 6 (3.2%) required revision; 4 (2.1%) for infection, 1 (0.5%) for significant haematoma with persistent deglobulisation and 1 (0.5%) for periprosthetic calcification during the 5 to 8 years following the operation. No hip was revised because of aseptic loosening. The mean annual wear rate based on the last follow-up at 5 years minimum was 0.065 mm per year. We observed no migration, 1 femoral loosening and no acetabular loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study finds a good survival rate which is compatible with the 94% at 20 years with RM Classic®. These results are suggestive but must be confirmed with long-term studies.

Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results?

BACKGROUND

Uncemented acetabular components have demonstrated low revision rates and high patient satisfaction but with concerns regarding increased costs compared with monoblock cups. Some newer lower-cost uncemented monoblock options have become available in the last decade, but limited data are available on their performance.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Does an uncemented, titanium-backed all-polyethylene acetabular cup provide reliable fixation? (2) What is the frequency and what are the causes for revision with this cup?

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2008, we elected to use an uncemented, titanium-backed all-polyethylene acetabular cup in older patients with limited physical demands. We performed 615 hip replacements in 550 patients with greater than 5 years of clinical and radiographic followup. When patients who were dead (80 hips in 75 patients), lost to followup (98 hips in 93 patients), or revised (three hips in three patients) were excluded, there were 434 hips in 379 patients for comparison of the postoperative and 5-year radiographs. Two observers not involved in the index surgical procedures (NH, HS) assessed radiographs for signs of migration or loosening. Some degree of early movement sometimes is seen before cup stabilization; however, to be conservative, we defined cups with greater than 3° of change of position (even if they subsequently stabilized) as potentially at risk and report them separately. Revision surgery, time from the index procedure, and the reason for revision were recorded from the New Zealand Joint Registry.

RESULTS

By 5 years there was a median change in inclination of 2° (range, 0°-13°; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-2.4; p < 0.001) and 2° of anteversion (range, 0°-11°; 95% CI, 2.0-2.4; p < 0.001). Although at last followup all cups appeared to have stabilized with no radiolucent lines or medial migration, 22% of the cups (94 of 434) had moved more than 3° and so were deemed to be potentially at risk. There were 11 revision procedures (of 429 hips; 2.5%) of which six were for recurrent dislocation, four for femoral fracture, and one for femoral loosening to give an overall all-cause revision rate for all components of 0.25 per 100 component years (95% CI, 0.13-0.43). No revisions were performed for acetabular loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

The short- to medium-term results of this all-polyethylene monoblock cup demonstrated a low frequency of revision. However, 94 cups were identified as potentially at risk based on movement of > 3° before apparent stabilization. Although those patients seem to be doing well enough now, the current duration of followup may not be sufficient to know that these cups will be durable, because other ongrowth designs have demonstrated a high frequency of late failure after apparent early success.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Poor outcome of a spherical pressfit cup with a modern ceramic liner: a prospective cohort study of 181 cups

A spherical pressfit cup with a new ceramic liner was introduced in a clinical trial in order to improve range of motion and reduce wear induced problems. The early clinical and radiological outcome was assessed.In a prospective cohort study 181 hips received a seleXys TH+ cup (Mathys, Bettlach, Switzerland) in combination with a third generation ceramic liner (ceramys, Mathys, Bettlach, Switzerland). The Harris Hip Score (HHS), pain (VAS) and range of motion (ROM) were recorded, cup migration and inclination were measured. Experience of any noise was documented.Fourteen hips were radiologically loose, seven of them were revised. Two-year survival of the cup was 92% with radiological loosening as the endpoint. There was no correlation between head size and ROM, no patient had a dislocation. There were no ceramic fractures. Two patients experienced squeaking and three clicking at final follow-up.Reasons for loosening might have been multifactorial but the rate of failure was unacceptably high. The use of large heads did not improve the ROM and development of noise could not be prevented with the modern ceramic. We abandoned the use of this implant system.

Survival outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented stems in primary total hip replacement

Total hip replacement (THR) is a successful and reliable operation for both relieving pain and improving function in patients who are disabled with end stage arthritis. The ageing population is predicted to significantly increase the requirement for THR in patients who have a higher functional demand than those of the past. Uncemented THR was introduced to improve the long term results and in particular the results in younger, higher functioning patients. There has been controversy about the value of uncemented compared to cemented THR although there has been a world-wide trend towards uncemented fixation. Uncemented acetabular fixation has gained wide acceptance, as seen in the increasing number of hybrid THR in joint registries, but there remains debate about the best mode of femoral fixation. In this article we review the history and current world-wide registry data, with an in-depth analysis of the New Zealand Joint Registry, to determine the results of uncemented femoral fixation in an attempt to provide an evidence-based answer as to the value of this form of fixation.

ACETABULAR LOAD-TRANSFER AND MECHANICAL STABILITY: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS COMPARING DIFFERENT CEMENTLESS SOCKETS

Acetabular stress shielding may be a failure mechanism of acetabular constructs promoting osteolysis, aseptic loosening and failure. We used three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) to evaluate the effect of flexible sockets on acetabular stress shielding. The sockets were made of (1) full polyethylene (PE), (2) PE with a metal bearing and (3) a PE insert with a metal backing was used as a traditional stiff implant. We compared the strain energy density and interfacial micro-motions between bone and cementless sockets during walking. In our FEA model, the most elastic socket (case 1) showed the highest levels of micro-motion during walking (400 μm). The most rigid socket (case 3) showed smaller areas of high micro-motions. Assuming a threshold for ingrowth of 50 microns, the flexible cup showed an ingrowth area of almost 40%, whereas the other two cases showed stable areas covering 60% of the total bone–component interface. Furthermore, we found that the introduction of an implant generates a very different strain pattern directly around the implant as compared with the intact case, which has a horse-shoe shaped cartilage layer in the acetabulum. This difference was not affected much by the stiffness of the implant; a more flexible implant resulted in only slightly higher strain levels. Bone strains over 1.5 mm from the cup showed physiological values and were not affected by the stiffness of the implant. Hence, this study shows that the physiological strain patterns are not obtained in the direct periprosthetic bone, regardless of the stiffness of the material.

Cementless RM Pressfit Cup: a clinical and radiological study of 91 cases with at least four years follow-up

Cementless metal-back acetabular cups have good long-term results, but some problems have appeared due to the shell's stiffness, modularity and required bearing surfaces. The RM Pressfit Cup is a single-piece polyethylene cementless acetabular cup that is covered by a thin layer of titanium. This allows for bone integration without limitations related to the stiffness of a metal-back shell. There is very little published information about this new, innovative implant design. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results from a continuous series of 91 cups (85 patients) with a follow-up of at least 4 years. No patients were lost to follow-up. The Harris Hip Score (HHS) was used to assess the clinical outcome. To assess the radiological outcomes, digital X-rays were used to evaluate the cup position and integration; wear was measured using Livermore's technique. The clinical results were excellent: the mean HHS was 94 and 82% of cases had good or excellent scores. Three of the cups had to be revised because of dislocation brought on by incorrect positioning. X-rays revealed that three implants had shifted during the first 6 weeks, but had stabilized afterwards. Bone integration on X-rays was satisfactory in all cases with no signs of osteolysis. The configuration of the bone trabeculae showed that loads between the implant and peri-acetabular cancellous bone were evenly distributed. The wear of the polyethylene cup-ceramic head bearing was 0.07 mm/year. The results of this series are consistent with recent published studies with the RM Pressfit Cup.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Do monoblock cups improve survivorship, decrease wear, or reduce osteolysis in uncemented total hip arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Monoblock acetabular components used in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) have certain mechanical characteristics that potentially reduce acetabular osteolysis and polyethylene wear. However, the degree to which they achieve this goal is not well documented.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to use a systematic review of controlled trials to test the hypothesis that monoblock cups have superior (1) polyethylene wear rate; (2) frequency of cup migration; (3) frequency of acetabular osteolysis; and (4) frequency of aseptic loosening compared with modular components used in uncemented THA.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases to assemble all controlled trials comparing monoblock with modular uncemented acetabular components in primary THA. Included studies were considered "best evidence" if the quality score was either ≥ 50% on the Cochrane Back Review Group checklist or ≥ 75% the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale. A total of seven publications met our inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Best evidence analysis showed no difference in polyethylene wear rate, the frequency of cup migration, and aseptic loosening between monoblock and modular acetabular components. No convincing evidence was found for the claim that lower frequencies of acetabular osteolysis are observed with the use of monoblock cups compared with modular uncemented cups.

CONCLUSIONS

The purported benefits of monoblock cups were not substantiated by this systematic review of controlled studies in that polyethylene wear rates and frequencies of cup failure and acetabular osteolysis were similar to those observed with modular implants. Other factors should therefore drive implant selection in cementless THA.

Five-year results of the uncemented RM pressfit cup clinical evaluation and migration measurements by EBRA

This was a prospective consecutive, study of 50 patients (mean age 72 years, 56% males) treated unilaterally for primary osteoarthrosis using the uncemented, isoelastic, monoblock RM Pressfit Cup. Migration and wear were assessed using the EBRA (Ein-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse) software (201 radiographs from 36 patients). Mean migration was 0.82 mm after 2 years and 1.25 mm after 5 years. A decreasing migration rate over the period was observed. The mean annual wear rate was 0.09 mm/y. Five years after surgery, 84% of patients reached good or excellent Harris hip score values. No revisions related to the acetabular component were necessary. All cups appeared to have high primary stability.

A cementless, elastic press-fit socket with and without screws

BACKGROUND

The acetabular component has remained the weakest link in hip arthroplasty regarding achievement of long-term survival. Primary fixation is a prerequisite for long-term performance. For this reason, we investigated the stability of a unique cementless titanium-coated elastic monoblock socket and the influence of supplementary screw fixation.

PATIENT AND METHODS

During 2006-2008, we performed a randomized controlled trial on 37 patients (mean age 63 years (SD 7), 22 females) in whom we implanted a cementless press-fit socket. The socket was implanted with additional screw fixation (group A, n = 19) and without additional screw fixation (group B, n = 18). Using radiostereometric analysis with a 2-year follow-up, we determined the stability of the socket. Clinically relevant migration was defined as > 1 mm translation and > 2º rotation. Clinical scores were determined.

RESULTS

The sockets without screw fixation showed a statistically significantly higher proximal translation compared to the socket with additional screw fixation. However, this higher migration was below the clinically relevant threshold. The numbers of migratory sockets were not significantly different between groups. After the 2-year follow-up, there were no clinically relevant differences between groups A and B regarding the clinical scores. 1 patient dropped out of the study. In the others, no sockets were revised.

INTERPRETATION

We found that additional screw fixation is not necessary to achieve stability of the cementless press-fit elastic RM socket. We saw no postoperative benefit or clinical effect of additional screw fixation.

Survival of uncemented acetabular monoblock cups: evaluation of 210 hips in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Monoblock acetabular cups represent a subtype of uncemented cups with the polyethylene liner molded into a metal shell, thus eliminating-or at least minimizing-potential backside wear. We hypothesized that the use of monoblock cups could reduce the incidence of osteolysis and aseptic loosening, and thus improve survival compared to modular designs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified all 210 primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register that used uncemented monoblock cups during the period 1999-2010. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses with adjustment for age, sex, and other variables were used to calculate survival rates and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of the revision risk for any reason. 1,130 modular cups, inserted during the same time period, were used as a control group.

RESULTS

There was a nearly equal sex distribution in both groups. Median age at the index operation was 47 years in the monoblock group and 56 years in the control group (p < 0.001). The cumulative 5-year survival with any revision as the endpoint was 95% (95% CI: 91-98) for monoblock cups and 97% (CI: 96-98) for modular cups (p = 0.6). The adjusted HR for revision of monoblock cups compared to modular cups was 2 (CI: 0.8-6; p = 0.1). The use of 28-mm prosthesis heads rather than 22-mm heads reduced the risk of cup revision (HR = 0.2, CI: 0.1-0.5; p = 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

Both cups showed good medium-term survival rates. There was no statistically significant difference in revision risk between the cup designs. Further review of the current patient population is warranted to determine the long-term durability and risk of revision of monoblock cup designs.

A technique to remove a well-fixed titanium-coated RM acetabular cup in revision hip arthroplasty

A major concern during revision hip arthroplasty is acetabular bone loss and bleeding during the extraction of well-fixed cementless acetabular cup, because no interface exists between the host bone and the cup. Forceful removal of such component using curved gouges and osteotomes often leads to extended bone loss and compromises reimplantation of a new socket. In the following case report, we removed a well-fixed polyethylene titanium-coated RM acetabular cup with 20 years of follow-up, by significant wear of the polyethylene layer. The isoelastic femoral stem was also removed by mechanical failure. We report a technique for removal of the cementless acetabular cup using powered acetabular reamers. The RM cup was sequentially reamed and when the polyethylene layer was thin enough, the remaining cup was removed easily by hand tools. The acetabular bone stock is preserved and the risks of bone fractures and bleeding are minimized. To our knowledge, these principles were applied only in cemented cups. We have used this technique in 10 cases with excellent results and no complications were noted. This is a simple, reproducible, non-costly, non-timing consuming, safe and successful technique to remove well-fixed titanium-coated RM acetabular cups.

Long-term survivorship analysis of the cementless Spotorno femoral component in patients less than 50 years of age

The long-term survival of the cementless Spotorno (CLS) femoral component (Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, USA) was evaluated in a consecutive series of 85 patients (100 hips) less than 50 years of age. The mean follow-up was 12.3 years. Two patients (3 hips) were lost to follow-up, and 3 (4 hips) died. The survival rate of the CLS stem was 96.9% (confidence interval [CI], 93.6%-100%) after 13 years based on revision of the stem for any reason. The survival of the stem with revision for aseptic loosening as the end point was 97.9% (CI, 95.1%-100%) at 13 years. The mean Harris hip score at time of follow-up was 94. The long-term survival of the CLS stem is excellent in patients less than 50 years of age.

Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review

PURPOSE

Total hip arthroplasty has been a very succesful orthopaedic procedure. The optimal fixation method of the acetabular component however, has not yet been defined.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review using the Medline and Embase databases to find evidence for the superiority of cemented or cementless acetabular components on short- and long-term clinical and radiological parameters. Methodological quality for randomised trials was assessed using the van Tulder checklist, and for the non randomised studies we used the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale.

RESULTS

Our search strategy revealed 16 randomised controlled trials (RCT) and 19 non RCT studies in which cemented and cementless acetabular components are compared. A best evidence analysis for complications, wear, osteolysis, migration and clinical scores showed no superiority for either cemented or cementless socket in the RCTs. A best evidence analysis for non RCT studies revealed better osteolysis, migration properties and aseptic loosening survival for cementless sockets; however, wear and overall survival favoured the cemented sockets.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that an orthopaedic surgeon should choose an established cemented or cementless socket for hip replacement based on patient characteristics, knowledge, experience and preference.

Cementless total hip replacement using second-generation components: a 12- to 16-year follow-up

We reviewed 123 second-generation uncemented total hip replacements performed on 115 patients by a single surgeon between 1993 and 1994. The acetabular component used in all cases was a fully porous-coated threaded hemispheric titanium shell (T-Tap ST) with a calcium ion stearate-free, isostatically compression-moulded polyethylene liner. The titanium femoral component used was a Taperloc with a reduced distal stem. No patient was lost to follow-up. Complete clinical and radiological follow-up was obtained for all 123 hips at a mean of 14 years (12 to 16). One femoral component was revised after a fracture, and three acetabular components for aseptic loosening. No additional femoral or acetabular components were judged loose by radiological criteria. Mild proximal femoral osteolysis was identified in two hips and minor acetabular osteolysis was present in four. The mean rate of penetration of the femoral head was 0.036 mm/year (0.000 to 0.227). These findings suggest that refinements in component design may be associated with excellent long-term fixation in cementless primary total hip replacement.

Treatment for acetabular dysplasia using the uncemented RM acetabular component - a 20 year follow-up

Our study reports a sub-group of patients with developmental dysplasia from a previously published larger series, with particular emphasis on the use of the uncemented RM acetabular component. We evaluated the long term results of 93 consecutive uncemented THAs in 80 patients using the titanium-coated RM acetabular component and the CLS femoral component in a prospective study. Eighteen hips in 16 patients had osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. The mean follow-up was 19.6 years (18.2 to 20.9). Fourteen patients with 15 hips were clinically and radiographically examined and evaluated. Two patients with 3 hips died. No patient was lost to follow-up. No implant had to be revised, and no cases showed evidence of radiographic loosening. Nine acetabular components were not completely covered by host bone but this did not affect the outcome. At the latest follow-up the mean Harris Hip Score was 92 (81 to 100). The mean annual wear rate was 0.12 mm. The RM acetabular component performed well over 20 years in this selected group of patients. Complete acetabular containment was not needed, thus allowing reliable reconstruction of the anatomical centre of rotation.

A cementless elastic monoblock socket in young patients: a ten to 18-year clinical and radiological follow-up

The survival of acetabular components depends on several factors: wear, osteolysis and septic or aseptic loosening. Osteolysis seems to be the main cause for concern in cementless arthroplasties. Acetabular osteolysis results from particle debris and segmental unloading of acetabular bone by rigid sockets. We investigated a cementless elastic monoblock socket with regard to acetabular osteolysis and aseptic loosening in a cohort of young patients. We evaluated 158 hip arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of ten years (ten to 18) and a mean age of 42 years (18–50). The overall revision rate at 14 years was 80% with a 98% survival rate for aseptic loosening. The mean polyethylene wear rate was 0.11 mm/year. Progressive acetabular osteolysis was seen in 3% of patients evaluated. In conclusion, we found low pelvic osteolysis rates, acceptable overall wear rates, satisfactory overall survival and excellent survival rates for aseptic loosening of a cementless elastic monoblock socket in patients younger than 50 years. Ongoing tribology developments and knowledge about acetabular bone adaptations behind acetabular implants will further lower wear and osteolysis rates and optimise survival rates of cementless sockets.

Survival of the cementless Spotorno stem in the second decade

High survival rates have been reported for the uncemented CLS Spotorno stem up to 10 years. To confirm survival at longer followup we report the minimum 15-year (mean, 17 years; range, 15-20 years) for 257 hips using this stem. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of all 326 patients (354 THAs) operated between 1985 and 1989. The patients had a mean age of 57 years using an uncemented grit-blasted, tapered titanium femoral stem. Eighty-six patients (89 hips) died and eight patients (eight hips) were lost to followup, leaving 240 patients (257 hips) for evaluation. The femoral component was revised in 35 hips: eight for infection, nine for periprosthetic fracture, one for traumatic loosening, and 17 for aseptic loosening. Survival of the stem was 88% at 17 years (95% confidence interval, 84%-92%), and survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 94% (95% confidence interval, 91%-97%). The median Harris hip score at followup was 80 points. No thigh pain was reported. Small osteolytic lesions (< 1 cm(2)) were found in the proximal Gruen zones (1 or/and 7) in 28 hips (15%). No distal femoral osteolysis was found. The long-term survival with this type of femoral component remains high in the second decade.

The Morscher Press Fit acetabular component: a nine- to 13-year review

We reviewed the results at nine to 13 years of 125 total hip replacements in 113 patients using the monoblock uncemented Morscher press-fit acetabular component. The mean age at the time of operation was 56.9 years (36 to 74). The mean clinical follow-up was 11 years (9.7 to 13.5) and the mean radiological follow-up was 9.4 years (7.7 to 13.1). Three hips were revised, one immediately for instability, one for excessive wear and one for deep infection. No revisions were required for aseptic loosening. A total of eight hips (7.0%) had osteolytic lesions greater than 1 cm, in four around the acetabular component (3.5%). One required bone grafting behind a well-fixed implant. The mean wear rate was 0.11 mm/year (0.06 to 0.78) and was significantly higher in components with a steeper abduction angle. Kaplan-Meier survival curves at 13 years showed survival of 96.8% (95% confidence interval 90.2 to 99.0) for revision for any cause and of 95.7% (95% confidence interval 88.6 to 98.4) for any acetabular re-operation.