Vertebral brown tumors causing neurologic compromise.
World Neurosurg 2011;
79:208.e1-6. [PMID:
22100293 DOI:
10.1016/j.wneu.2010.02.022]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2009] [Accepted: 02/10/2010] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Brown tumors are nonneoplastic lesions that occur only in the setting of hyperparathyroidism. Although vertebral brown tumors are relatively rare pathologic entities, their incidence seems to be on the rise, as evidenced by multiple case reports published during the past four decades. An extensive review of these lesions is lacking in the literature. We present a case of paraparesis secondary to vertebral brown tumor followed by a detailed review of the literature.
METHODS
We performed a review of the literature to locate all reported cases to date of vertebral brown tumors resulting in neurologic sequelae. In addition, we present the case of a 33-year-old female with end-stage renal disease and previous subtotal parathyroidectomy who presented with acute-onset paraparesis from an expansile L1 brown tumor and was treated successfully by laminectomy and bracing.
RESULTS
Thirty cases of vertebral brown tumor resulting in neurologic deficit were located in our literature search. Most occurred in women (63%), those aged 40 to 49 years (27%), and in the thoracic spine (57%). Lesions occurred roughly equally in primary (47%) and secondary (53%) hyperparathyroidism. Most patients demonstrated either symptomatic or radiographic improvement after neurosurgical intervention and/or subtotal or total parathyroidectomy.
CONCLUSION
In patients presenting with a lytic vertebral lesion and known hyperparathyroidism or end-stage renal disease, brown tumor should be considered in the differential diagnosis. In select cases with minimal neurologic symptoms, parathyroidectomy may be warranted prior to neurosurgical intervention.
Collapse