Subtalar and talonavicular arthrodesis through a single medial approach for the correction of severe planovalgus deformity

Surgical management of severe planovalgus foot deformity in children with generalised joint hypermobility

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of calcaneal lengthening osteotomy (CLO) and double arthrodesis of the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints (DA) for correcting planovalgus foot deformity exclusively in patients with generalised joint hypermobility.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 29 feet in 17 consecutive patients who underwent either CLO or DA. The mean age at surgery was 11.3 ± 2.3 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 7.7 ± 3.2 years. Preoperative and final follow-up radiographs and dynamic foot-pressure measurements were analysed.

RESULTS

Both operations significantly improved the radiographic parameters, except for the lateral talocalcaneal angle in the CLO group. Pedobarographic study demonstrated an elevation of the medial longitudinal arch and an improved foot-pressure distribution after both surgeries. The plantar pressure in the lateral forefoot significantly increased only in the DA group, while the pressures exerted on the medial forefoot and hindfoot and the arch index improved only in the CLO group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CLO and DA effectively improve the foot alignments of the deformity in patients with generalised joint hypermobility. However, differences were observed in the changes in the lateral talocalcaneal angle and plantar pressure distribution between the two procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III.

Medial Double Arthrodesis Through Single Approach

Triple arthrodesis is a time-tested procedure toward primary salvage in the context of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, symptomatic rigid and severe hindfoot malalignment, end-stage degenerative and posttraumatic arthritis, and sequelae of paralytic diseases. Today, the indication for hindfoot arthrodesis is applied to correct painful deformities and arthritic joints, such as advanced cases of adult-acquired flatfoot secondary to ligament collapse and insufficiency of the posterior tibial tendon. Although the triple arthrodesis is an effective and reliable outcome procedure, the popularity of a medial double arthrodesis has increased.

Subtalar and talonavicular arthrodesis under lateral arthroscopy

Open hindfoot surgery incurs certain complications: notably, infection and skin problems. Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis reduced the complications rate while ensuring >90% fusion. To date, arthroscopy is little used for talonavicular arthrodesis. Here, we describe subtalar and talonavicular arthrodesis under arthroscopy via 2 lateral portals around the sinus tarsi. Level of evidence: IV.

Double and Triple Tarsal Fusions in the Severe Rigid Flatfoot Deformity

A flatfoot deformity is a multiplanar foot deformity characterized by forefoot abduction and supination and hindfoot valgus. With progressive pathology, a rigid deformity may develop. In the setting of a rigid deformity, the appropriate procedure to use is not without controversy. The extent of joints to involve in the arthrodesis depends on the ability to obtain a plantigrade foot. Both double and triple arthrodesis have been suggested. Care must be taken to avoid lateral column shortening and loss of foot reduction when fusing the CC joint. The concerns about lateral skin breakdown led some surgeons to describe a single medial incision for a triple or modified double arthrodesis. The necessity of bone grafting has been controversial. Implant selection is essential to achieve solid stabilization of the arthrodesis sites. To decrease the risk of overcorrection and malunion, the surgeon should be familiar with the hindfoot biomechanics and generate, based on the clinical examination and imaging, a meticulous preoperative plan to address and balance both the soft tissue and bony deformity.

Double Versus Triple Arthrodesis Fusion Rates: A Systematic Review

Hindfoot arthrodesis is often required for end-staged deformities, such as posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, osteoarthritis, or rheumatoid arthritis. Although the need for hindfoot arthrodesis is generally accepted in severe deformities, there is a debate whether a double or triple arthrodesis should be performed. The aim of our systematic review is to review the fusion rates and mean time to fusion in double and triple arthrodesis. A total of 184 articles were identified using the keyword search through the database of articles published from 2005 to 2017. After review by 3 physicians, a total of 13 articles met the eligibility criteria. The reason for double or triple arthrodesis within the studies were posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, tarsal coalition, degenerative joint disease, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Charcot Marie Tooth, Multiple Sclerosis, Polio, neuromuscular disorder, cerebral palsy, acrodystrophic neuropathy, clubfoot, post-traumatic, and seronegative arthropathy (spondyloarthritis). Within these 13 studies, there were a total of 343 (6-95) subjects extremities operated on. The overall fusion rate for double arthrodesis was 91.75% (289/315) compared to 92.86% (26/28) triple arthrodesis fusion rate, p value .8370. The mean time to fusion for double arthrodesis was 17.96 ± 7.96 weeks compared to 16.70 ± 8.18 weeks for triple arthrodesis, p value = .8133. There are risks associated with triple arthrodesis including increased surgical times, lateral wound complications, residual deformity, surgical costs and peri-articular arthritis. Given the benefits of double arthrodesis over triple arthrodesis and the nearly equivalent fusion rates and time to fusion, double arthrodesis is an effective alternative to triple arthrodesis. The authors of this systematic review recommend double arthrodesis as the hindfoot fusion procedure of choice.

Assessment of Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity Using Semiautomated 3D Measurements Derived From Weightbearing CT Scans

BACKGROUND

In progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD), hind- and midfoot deformities can be hard to characterize based on weightbearing plain radiography. Semiautomated 3-dimensional (3D) measurements derived from weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) scans may provide a more accurate deformity assessment. In the present study, automated 3D measurements based on WBCT were used to compare hindfoot alignment of healthy individuals to patients with PCFD.

METHODS

The WBCT scans of 20 patients treated at our institution with either a flexible (N = 10) or rigid (N = 10) PCFD were compared with the WBCT scans of a control group of 30 healthy individuals. Using semiautomated image analysis software, from each set of 3D voxel images, we measured the talar tilt (TT), hindfoot moment arm (HMA), talocalcaneal angle (TCA; axial/lateral), talonavicular coverage (TNC), and talocalcaneal overlap (TCO). The presence of medial facet subluxation as well as sinus tarsi/subfibular impingement was additionally assessed.

RESULTS

With the exception of the TCA (axial/lateral), the analyzed measurements differed between healthy individuals and patients with PCFD. The TCA axial correlated with the TNC in patients with PCFD. An increased TCO combined with sinus tarsi impingement raised the probability of predicting a deformity as rigid.

CONCLUSION

Using 3D measurements, in this relatively small cohort of patients, we identified relevant variables associated with a clinical presentation of flexible or rigid PCFD. An increased TCO combined with sinus tarsi impingement raised the probability of predicting a deformity as rigid. Such WBCT-based markers possibly can help the surgeon in decision-making regarding the appropriate surgical strategy (eg, osteotomies vs realignment arthrodesis). However, prospective studies are necessary to confirm the utility of the proposed parameters in the treatment of PCFD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

The Assessment of Ankle Osteoarthritis with Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography

The standard for diagnostic radiographic imaging in foot and ankle surgery was until 2012 radiographs with full weight-bearing without any useful alternative. Weight-bearing cone-beam computed tomography (WBCT) was introduced 2012 for foot and ankle use as a new technology that allows 3D imaging with full weight-bearing which should be not influenced by projection and/or foot orientation. The assessment of ankle osteoarthritis with WBCT including the description of healthy status, effect of alignment and7or (in)stability is extensively illustrated in this review article.

Medial approach for subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis

Subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis is a useful technique commonly employed in the management of calcaneal and talar fracture malunion. Traditionally it is performed via a posterolateral or extensile lateral approach, however such approaches have been associated with wound complications, particularly secondary to the added stress caused by the subtalar distraction crucial to this technique. Medial approaches to the subtalar joint have been used in other procedures but have not been reported in subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis. A novel case and technique illustrating the medial approach for subtalar distraction bone block arthrodesis is discussed. LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Single Medial vs 2-Incision Approach for Double Hindfoot Arthrodesis: Is There a Difference in Joint Preparation?

BACKGROUND

Double hindfoot arthrodesis is a reliable treatment option in lower extremity deformity and arthritis. Single (medial) and 2-incision techniques have been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of cartilage debrided in each approach and to evaluate the competency of the deltoid ligament.

METHODS

Eight matched pairs of cadaveric specimens were acquired. One limb from each pair was randomly assigned to the single medial incision and the other to the 2-incision technique. Stress radiographs were obtained prior to dissection to evaluate for valgus tibiotalar tilt. The talonavicular and subtalar articular surfaces were denuded of cartilage and the joints disarticulated. The percentage of cartilage debrided was determined using ImageJ software. Postoperative tibiotalar tilt was measured with a technique and threshold previously described by our group. The intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to determine inter- and intraobserver reliability.

RESULTS

The single medial incision demonstrated significantly less cartilage denuded than the 2-incision technique at the talar head (61.1% ± 20.4% vs 88.1% ± 6.1%, P < .001), and the posterior facets of the talus (53.5% ± 7.6% vs 73.6% ± 7.0%, P < .001) and calcaneus (55.3% ± 16.5% vs 81.0% ± 7.4%, P = .001). Overall, 75% of specimens that underwent a single medial incision approach demonstrated increased valgus tibiotalar tilt postdissection, whereas none that underwent the 2-incision technique developed increased tibiotalar tilt (P < .01). The average tibiotalar tilt among these specimens was 4.6 ± 1.3 degrees (range 2.5-5.7 degrees). For all measurements, the intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.8.

CONCLUSION

The posterior facet of the subtalar joint and talar head are at risk of subtotal debridement, as well as increased tibiotalar tilt with the single medial incision technique. Adequate debridement may require greater soft tissue dissection, possibly at the expense of medial ankle stability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Double hindfoot arthrodesis using a single-incision medial approach in the correction of adult-acquired flatfoot deformity: a case series

BACKGROUND

Hindfoot arthrodesis is used in patients with advanced-stage acquired flatfoot, usually associated with degenerative joint disease. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of hindfoot arthrodesis using the single-incision medial approach.

METHODS

A case series of 18 consecutive patients undergoing surgical correction between 2015 and 2018 with hindfoot arthrodesis using the medial approach was evaluated. The clinical assessment used the visual analog pain scale, AOFAS hindfoot score, SF-36, and foot function index. Radiographs and personal satisfaction criteria were also analyzed.

RESULTS

All radiographic parameters evaluated showed a significant improvement (p < .05), except the calcaneal pitch. Pain decreased by 5.1 points (p < .001), and the mean final AOFAS score was 72.6. In three feet, a new surgery was required. Two feet developed talar necrosis. None of the cases presented surgical wound dehiscence, and two presented with superficial infection, which was resolved with the use of oral antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

Double arthrodesis (subtalar and talonavicular) to correct adult-acquired valgus flatfoot using a medial approach has a low risk of soft tissue complications and presents satisfactory functional results. Avascular necrosis is a serious complication that was present in 11% of cases.

Double versus triple arthrodesis for adult-acquired flatfoot deformity due to stage III posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: a prospective comparative study of two cohorts

Purpose

The study aims to prospectively compare double and triple arthrodesis in terms of functional outcomes and deformity correction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first prospective comparative study in the literature to date.

Methods

This is a prospective comparative cohort study carried out between May 2017 and May 2019. The study was approved by the IRB at Assiut University and done according to the Helsinki declaration. Patients with AAFD stage III aged between 15 and 40 years old were assigned to double arthrodesis or triple arthrodesis. The groups were prospectively followed for one year. Primary outcomes were union rates, AOFAS scores, and radiological parameters of deformity correction on AP and lateral plain radiographs. Secondary outcomes were operative time, time to union, and complications. The double arthrodesis was done through the medial approach, while the triple arthrodesis was done through dual medial and lateral approaches. The post-operative protocol was standardized for both groups.

Results

A total of twenty-three patients matched the inclusion criteria and provided their consent to participate in the study. Thirteen (all males) patients underwent double arthrodesis, while ten (nine males and one female) patients underwent triple arthrodesis. The mean age for double and triple arthrodesis was 20.15 ± 5.63 and 25.10 ± 8.36 years, respectively, and the mean follow-up lengths were 12.46 and 12.9 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in age, gender, laterality, or duration of follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in AOFAS hindfoot scores or radiographic parameters. All patients were available for the final follow-up evaluation. All patients in both groups achieved union by four months post-operatively. The mean time to union in the double and triple arthrodesis groups was 3.39 ± 0.65 vs. 3.31 ± 0.6 months, respectively, with no statistically significant differences (p = 0.77). The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the double arthrodesis group than the triple arthrodesis group, 55.77 ± 15.18 vs. 91.6 ± 24.14 min (p < 0.001), respectively. Both double and triple arthrodesis groups had a statistically significant improvement of the mean AOFAS hindfoot score post-operatively (71.46 ± 7.77 vs. 88.38 ± 3.66, p < 0.001) and (66.9 ± 7.69 vs. 85 ± 5.83, p < 0.001), respectively. In the double arthrodesis group, the mean calcaneal pitch angle increased from 11.46° pre-operatively to 19.34° (MD = 8.45°, p < 0.001). The mean Meary’s angle improved from − 4.19 to 2.9° (MD = 7.32°, p < 0.001). Hibbs angle had a mean reduction of 6.45° post-operatively (p = 0.069). In the triple arthrodesis group, the mean calcaneal pitch angle improved from 10.06° pre-operatively to 17.49° post-operatively (MD = 7.12°, p < 0.001). The mean Meary’s angle improved from − 4.72 to 2.29° (MD = 7.09°, p < 0.001). The mean Hibbs angle decreased from 153.07 to 142.32° (MD = 10.54°, p < 0.001). The double vs. triple arthrodesis groups had no statistically significant differences in AOFAS hindfoot score improvement (16.92 vs. 19.1, p = 0.44), respectively. The two groups had no statistically significant differences in the magnitude of correction of all the radiographic parameters.

Conclusion

Double arthrodesis is an equally reliable surgical option for AAFD stage III for achieving union, improving the functional outcomes, and deformity correction as triple arthrodesis with a significantly shorter operative time in the former. The authors recommend double arthrodesis if the calcaneocuboid joint is unaffected.

Lateral open wedge calcaneus osteotomy with bony allograft augmentation in adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Clinical and radiological results

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of patients underwent lateral open wedge calcaneus osteotomy with bony allograft augmentation combined with tibialis posterior and tibialis anterior tenodesis. Twenty-two patients underwent adult-acquired flatfoot deformity were retrospectively evaluated with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic preoperative and final comparison of tibio-calcaneal angle, talo–first metatarsal and calcaneal pitch angles have been performed. The Visual Analog Scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score, the Foot and Ankle Disability Index and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure were used for subjective and functional assessment. The instrumental range of motion has been also assessed at latest follow-up evaluation and compared with preoperative value. There was a significant improvement of final mean values of clinical scores (p < 0.001). Nineteen out of 22 (86.4%) patients resulted very satisfied or satisfied for the clinical result. There was a significant improvement of the radiographic parameters (p < 0.001). There were no differences between preoperative and final values of range of motion. One failure occurred 7 years after surgery. Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity correction demonstrated good mid-term results and low recurrence and complications rate.

Level of evidence

Level 4, retrospective case series.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Radiographic Assessment in Primary and Revision Stage II, III, and IV Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity Surgery

BACKGROUND

Progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) is a progressive hindfoot and midfoot deformity causing pain and disability. Although operative treatment is stage dependent, few studies have looked at patient-reported and radiographic outcomes stratified by primary vs revision stage II, III, and IV reconstruction surgery. Our goal was to assess operative improvement using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and to determine whether radiographic parameter improvement correlates with patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores were prospectively obtained on 46 consecutive patients who underwent PCFD reconstruction between November 2013 and January 2019. Thirty-six patients completed pre- and postoperative PROMIS surveys, 6 patients completed only preoperative PROMIS surveys, and 4 patients completed 12-month postoperative PROMIS surveys but did not complete preoperative PROMIS surveys. Minimum follow-up was 12 (average, 23) months. Radiographic correction was measured with pre- and postoperative weightbearing radiographs and correlated with PROMIS scores. Measurements included the talonavicular uncoverage angle, talonavicular uncoverage percentage, anteroposterior talo-first metatarsal angle, Meary angle, medial cuneiform height (MCH), and medial cuneiform-fifth metatarsal height.

RESULTS

For the overall cohort, PROMIS PF increased significantly from 37.5±5.6 to 42.3±7.1 (P = .0014). PROMIS PI improved significantly from 64.5±6.0 to 55.1±9.8 (P < .0001). Preoperative, postoperative, and change in PROMIS scores were not statistically different between PCFD stages. Change in PROMIS PI was significantly greater in primary (-12.3) vs revision (-3.7) surgery (P = .0157). Change in PROMIS PF was greater in primary (+6.0) vs revision surgery (+2.3) but did not reach statistical significance. All radiographic measurements improved significantly (P < .05). In primary stage II PCFD, postoperative PROMIS scores correlated with postoperative MCH (PF: r = 0.7725, P = .0020; PI: r = -0.5692, P = .0446).

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported and radiographic outcomes improved significantly after PCFD reconstruction. We found no significant difference in preoperative, postoperative, or change in PROMIS scores between PCFD stages. However, stage III patients had smaller improvements in PROMIS PF, which we feel may be secondary to change in function after arthrodesis. Primary operations had better patient-reported outcomes compared to revision operations. In primary stage II PCFD, reconstructing the medial arch height correlated significantly with improvement in pain and functionality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Consensus on Indications for Isolated Subtalar Joint Fusion and Naviculocuneiform Fusions for Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

RECOMMENDATION

Peritalar subluxation represents an important hindfoot component of progressive collapsing foot deformity, which can be associated with a breakdown of the medial longitudinal arch. It results in a complex 3-dimensional deformity with varying degrees of hindfoot valgus, forefoot abduction, and pronation. Loss of peritalar stability allows the talus to rotate and translate on the calcaneal and navicular bone surfaces, typically moving medially and anteriorly, which may result in sinus tarsi and subfibular impingement. The onset of degenerative disease can manifest with stiffening of the subtalar (ST) joint and subsequent fixed and possibly arthritic deformity. While ST joint fusion may permit repositioning and stabilization of the talus on top of the calcaneus, it may not fully correct forefoot abduction and it does not correct forefoot varus. Such varus may be addressed by a talonavicular (TN) fusion or a plantar flexion osteotomy of the first ray, but, if too pronounced, it may be more effectively corrected with a naviculocuneiform (NC) fusion. The NC joint has a curvature in the sagittal plane. Thus, preserving the shape of the joint is the key to permitting plantarflexion correction by rotating the midfoot along the debrided surfaces and to fix it. Intraoperatively, care must be also taken to not overcorrect the talocalcaneal angle in the horizontal plane during the ST fusion (eg, to exceed the external rotation of the talus and inadvertently put the midfoot in a supinated position). Such overcorrection can lead to lateral column overload with persistent lateral midfoot pain and discomfort. A contraindication for an isolated ST fusion may be a rupture of posterior tibial tendon because of the resultant loss of the internal rotation force at the TN joint. In these cases, a flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer is added to the procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V, consensus, expert opinion.

[Arthrodesis for the treatment of rigid flatfoot]

In the case of a rigid flatfoot deformity, joint-preserving techniques like soft-tissue balancing and osteotomies do not achieve acceptable results. This is the indication for arthrodesis. The selection of the arthrodesis depends on the amount of deformity, localisation of the rigidity and the general health status of the patient. Isolated arthrodesis can be combined with soft-tissue reconstructions. It is functionally advantageous to preserve as many joints as possible.

Comparative Study of Spring Ligament Reconstructions Using Either Hamstring Allograft or Synthetic Ligament Augmentation

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic flatfeet are usually caused by attenuation of the medial soft tissues rather than a lateral osseous deficiency. Debate continues on whether spring ligament attenuation or posterior tibial tendon (PTT) dysfunction is the initial driver for the deformity. Our comparative prospective study aimed to quantify the radiological and clinical outcomes of 2 techniques for spring ligament reconstruction using a hamstring graft or a synthetic ligament.

METHODS

Seventeen spring ligament reconstructions (SLRs) were performed in 17 patients using synthetic ligament augmentation and 16 SLRs were performed using hamstring allograft in 13 patients. Additional procedures such as gastrocnemius recession, PTT advancement, flexor digitorum longus transfer, and calcaneal osteotomy were performed as required. A minimum of 12 months of follow-up was available for all cases. Radiographic analysis was performed with standardized parameters.

RESULTS

Following SLR with synthetic ligament augmentation, all radiological parameters significantly improved (P < .05). Hamstring allograft SLR also demonstrated significantly improved radiographic parameters in all but Meary's line at final follow-up. At 12 months, patient outcome scores were significantly better in the synthetic ligament group.

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of the spring ligament using either hamstring allograft or synthetic ligament augmentation provided significant improvements in radiological alignment; however, superior patient-reported outcomes were found in the synthetic ligament augmentation group.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Managing Severe Foot and Ankle Deformities in Global Humanitarian Programs

The severe foot and ankle deformities the authors' organization has encountered in humanitarian programs worldwide are more complicated than those surgeons treat in daily practice in developed countries. Severity of deformity, patients' economic limitations, patients' expectations and realistic needs in life, availability of surgical instrumentation, the local team's understanding of foot and ankle surgery and their ability to do consultation for patients postoperatively, and compliance of patients all account for success of the surgery. Regardless of the effort surgeons make, complications and recurrence occur. Educating and training local surgeons to take over medical care are the most important goals of the programs.

Triple Arthrodesis for Adult-Acquired Flatfoot Deformity

Originally described as a means to address fixed deformities or uncontrolled movement of the hindfoot observed in paralytic foot deformities, triple arthrodesis has evolved into a powerful procedure for the correction of a variety of foot deformities. Over the past decade, multiple advances have been made with respect to diagnostic imaging, fixation options, bone graft substitutes, and postoperative regimens. While this operation requires experience and skill to execute, when properly performed, it allows for correction of deformity and a plantigrade and ideally pain-free foot for ambulation. The purpose of this review is to highlight advances in the procedure and its application to the rigid planovalgus foot.

Level of Evidence:

Level V, review.

Pathological kinematic patterns of the tarsal complex in stage II adult-acquired flatfoot deformity

The in vivo kinematic characteristics of the tarsal joints during gait stance phase were still unclear in adult-acquired foot deformity (AAFD). This study included seven healthy subjects (14 feet) and 12 stage II AAFD patients (14 feet). The 3D models of tarsal bones were reconstructed based on CT scan. Each subject took standard gait on the single fluoroscopy system. Continuous lateral fluoroscopic images were collected. The key postures during the stance phase were selected. The 2D-3D registration technique was applied to explore the spatial motions of the tarsal joints in 6 degrees of freedom (DOF). During the whole stance phase, the AAFD talo-navicular joint (TNJ) exhibited ROM of 13 ± 6° in the sagittal plane while the normal subjects showed ROM of 7 ± 3° (p = 0.004). In AAFD, the subtalar joint (STJ) demonstrated 19 ± 8° and 7 ± 3° of motion in coronal and horizontal plane, respectively, while the normal subjects showed 14 ± 4°(p = 0.031) and 11 ± 3° (p = 0.014) of motion, respectively. Additionally STJ of AAFD patients showed significantly less dorsiflexion during the weight acceptance and showed significantly less external rotation both during the weight acceptance and single limb support of stance phase. In conclusion, for stage II AAFD patients, the talonavicular joint and the subtalar joint showed hypermobility in dorsi/planterflexion and inversion/eversion, respectively, during the gait stance phase while the internal/external rotation of the subtalar joint was reduced. The current study improves our understanding of the pathological kinematics of the tarsal complex in AAFD patients. Notice should be taken about these tarsal joints mobility in AAFD during clinical practice. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:477-482, 2019.

Combined Subtalar and Naviculocuneiform Fusion for Treating Adult Acquired Flatfoot Deformity With Medial Arch Collapse at the Level of the Naviculocuneiform Joint

BACKGROUND:

A challenge in treating acquired flatfoot deformities is the collapse of the medial arch at the level of the naviculocuneiform (NC) joint. Triple fusions, being a treatment option, may lead to problems such as increased foot stiffness. We thus established a method that combines subtalar (ST) fusion with NC fusion while preserving the Chopart joint. We analyzed the radiographic correction, fusion rate, and patient satisfaction with this procedure.

METHODS:

34 feet in 31 patients (female, 23; male, 8; age 67 [45-81] years) were treated with a ST and NC joint fusion. In 15 cases, a medial sliding-osteotomy was additionally necessary to fully correct hindfoot valgus. The following radiographic parameters were measured on weightbearing radiographs preoperatively and at 2 years: talo-first metatarsal angle, talocalcaneal angle, calcaneal pitch, talonavicular coverage angle and calcaneal offset. Fusion was radiologically confirmed.

RESULTS:

All parameters, except the calcaneal pitch, showed a significant improvement. Fusion was observed after 1 year in all but 2 cases (94.1%). One nonunion each occurred at the ST and NC joint without needing any subsequent treatment. One patient developed avascular necrosis of the lateral talus with need for total ankle replacement after 1 year. All patients were satisfied with the obtained results.

CONCLUSION:

Our data suggest that a combined fusion of the ST and NC joint was effective and safe when treating adult acquired flatfoot with collapse of the medial arch at the level of the NC joint. Although the talonavicular joint was not fused, its subluxation was significantly reduced.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level IV, case series.

Structures at Risk During Percutaneous Screw Fixation for Talonavicular Fusion

BACKGROUND:

Talonavicular (TN) fusion using screws dorsomedially and dorsolaterally can cause neurovascular injury. The purpose of our cadaveric study was to evaluate the safety of percutaneous screw insertion in relation to dorsal neurovascular structures.

METHODS:

Ten fresh-frozen cadaver legs were used for this study. Percutaneous cannulated screws were inserted to perform isolated TN arthrodesis. The screws were inserted at 3 consistent sites: a "medial screw" at the dorsomedial navicular where it intersected at the medial plane of the first cuneiform, a "central screw" at the edge of the dorsal navicular between the medial and intermediate cuneiforms, and a "lateral screw" at the edge of the dorsal navicular between the intermediate and lateral cuneiforms. Superficial and deep dissections were carried out to identify any injured nerves, arteries, and/or tendons.

RESULTS:

The medial screw injured the anterior tibialis tendon in 2 cases (20%), the central screw injured the extensor hallucis longus tendon in 3 cases (30%), and the lateral screw injured the anterior branch of the superior peroneal nerve (SPN), the lateral branch of the SPN, and the medial branch of the distal peroneal nerve (DPN) once each in a total of 3 cases (30%). Despite no direct injury, the central screw indicated a potential risk of neurovascular injury: closest distance to the anterior SPN was 2 mm and to the medial DPN 2 mm.

CONCLUSION:

Although neurovascular injury risk exists for all of these screw placements, TN fusion with a central screw introduced a potentially decreased risk of neurovascular injury at the expense of increased risk of tendon injury compared to the lateral screw.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE:

Based on these results, we recommend a careful dissection be performed prior to percutaneous screw insertion.

Medial Double Arthrodesis: Technique Guide and Tips

The triple arthrodesis procedure remains the historical standard to treat complex hindfoot pathology. However, in recent data, the medial double arthrodesis has been documented to provide similar benefit with decreased complication rates compared with the triple arthrodesis. Therefore, increased interest in this procedure for the treatment of complex hindfoot pathologies has ensued. We describe the technical components of the medial double arthrodesis.

Medial Approach to the Subtalar Joint

Surgical access to the subtalar joint is required in a plethora of pathologic conditions of the hindfoot. The conventional lateral approach can give excellent access to subtalar joint; however, in hindfoot valgus deformities, there can be unacceptable risks of wound problems and incomplete deformity corrections. The medial approach offers good access to the subtalar joint with an increasing evidence base for its use, especially with double fusions in pes planus deformities. The authors review the current evidence in the use of the medial approach for the subtalar joint.

Overcorrected Flatfoot Reconstruction

The overcorrected flatfoot reconstruction is a less common but often difficult sequelae of surgical treatment of the adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Understanding the patient's symptoms and how they correlate to the procedures performed during the index surgery are paramount to determining the appropriate course of treatment. Patients' symptoms may resemble those seen in the cavovarus foot condition, often secondary to overlengthening of the lateral column or excessive displacement of the calcaneal tuberosity. Osteotomies of the calcaneus, midfoot, and often the first metatarsal may be sufficient to revise the overcorrection. However, hindfoot and/or midfoot arthrodesis may be required in more severe or rigid cases.

Arthroscopic Triple Arthrodesis in Management of Chronic Flatfoot Deformity

Triple arthrodesis has a significant role in the management of hindfoot osteoarthritis and deformity. Traditionally, it is an open procedure with extensive soft tissue dissection. Arthroscopic triple arthrodesis would appear to provide good visualization and preparation of the fusion surfaces while preserving the soft tissue envelope. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe a minimally invasive approach of triple arthrodesis to correct chronic flatfoot deformity.

Total Ankle Replacement with Severe Valgus Deformity: Technique and Surgical Strategy

Correction of severe valgus deformity of the foot and ankle with ankle replacement is challenging. We describe the controversies and specific issues of surgical management and provide a detailed surgical strategy for management of this common deformity. A reliable technique for deltoid reconstruction is also described and illustrated in detail.

Low-Cost Intra-Articular Distraction Technique Using Kirschner Wires and a Toothed Lamina Spreader

We describe a low-cost (instrument cost) technique for joint distraction using 2 Kirschner wires and a toothed lamina spreader in lieu of a Hintermann distractor. The described technique allows for temporary intra-articular distraction and visualization and preservation of the articular surface with extra-articular instrumentation. The technique can also allow for closed reduction and percutaneous treatment in cases of soft tissue compromise. Additionally, the technique uses common orthopedic surgical instruments, leading to a minimal learning curve for novice surgeons. We have found this distraction technique to be most effective for intra-articular preparation of hindfoot and midfoot arthrodeses and for navicular fracture reduction.

Injectable Recombinant Human Platelet-derived Growth Factor in Collagen Carrier for Hindfoot Fusion

Arthrodesis of the hindfoot is a common procedure for degenerative joint disease and/or severe deformity. Nonunion is a common complication from this procedure, causing an increased burden to the patient and health care system, often resulting in the need for revision surgery. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF) has been shown to be a safe and effective tool to enhance arthrodesis rates in hindfoot surgery while avoiding the potential morbidity of bone grafting. This article provides a review of the role of rhPDGF in hindfoot fusions, and the surgical technique for performing an rhPDGF enhanced double-arthrodesis through a medial approach.

Increased Failure Rate of Modified Double Arthrodesis Compared With Triple Arthrodesis for Rigid Pes Planovalgus

For rigid pes planovalgus deformities, modified double and triple arthrodeses have had high union rates and subjective outcomes reported. Increased rates of talonavicular nonunions after modified double arthrodesis have led to concern regarding this procedure. A retrospective medical record review was performed of patients who had undergone either a modified double (n = 9) or triple (n = 7) arthrodesis for stage 3 pes planovalgus deformity. Radiographs were reviewed for hindfoot alignment, bony union, and hardware failure. Data from questionnaires, including the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, were obtained. No significant differences were found between the cohorts in terms of preoperative radiographic parameters or patient characteristics. The modified double arthrodesis cohort demonstrated a nonunion rate of 44% (4 of 9), but the triple arthrodesis cohort had a 0% (0 of 7) nonunion rate (p = .042). The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure activities of daily living, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score activities of daily living, and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score quality of life scores were significantly worse for the modified double arthrodesis than for the triple arthrodesis group. For patients with stage 3 pes planovalgus, modified double arthrodesis resulted in significantly greater rates of nonunion and incomplete union, with significantly inferior subjective outcome scores compared with triple arthrodesis for the same indication.

Primary Triple Arthrodesis for Management of Rigid Flatfoot Deformity

Introduction

Primary triple arthrodesis is a powerful and reliable procedure for stabilizing and correcting painful rigid flatfoot deformities with a low rate of complications.

Indications & Contraindications

Step 1 Preoperative Planning

Pay careful attention to the history, physical examination, and weight-bearing radiographic studies as they are critical for selecting patients who will benefit from a triple arthrodesis.

Step 2 Room Setup and Patient Positioning

Position the patient supine on the operating table with the toes pointing straight up to the ceiling.

Step 3 Incisions and Exposure

For a standard triple arthrodesis, use 2 incisions: a lateral sinus tarsi incision, which allows exposure of the subtalar joint, CC joint, and lateral aspect of the TN joint, and a medial incision, which provides exposure of the TN joint.

Step 4 Joint Preparation

Ensure that joint preparation is thorough as this is critical for the success of any hindfoot arthrodesis.

Step 5 Reduction of Deformity

Reduce the TN joint first, followed by the subtalar joint, restoring a plantigrade foot and approximately 5° of hindfoot valgus alignment.

Step 6 Joint Fixation

Perform rigid fixation of the subtalar joint first, followed by fixation of the TN and CC joints.

Step 7 Accessory Procedures

Accessory procedures are often required in addition to the triple arthrodesis to ensure that appropriate hindfoot alignment and a plantigrade foot are achieved.

Step 8 Wound Closure

Perform a staged wound closure, taking care to maximize soft-tissue coverage over the involved hindfoot joints.

Step 9 Postoperative Care

Ensure that the patient follows strict non-weight-bearing precautions in the immediate postoperative period to limit micromotion at the arthrodesis sites and allow for timely fusion.

Results

In one of the largest published series of patients managed with triple arthrodesis (111 patients), Pell et al. reported a union rate of 98% at a minimum follow-up of 2 years, with 91% of patients indicating that they would be willing to repeat the procedure under similar circumstances⁴.

Pitfalls & Challenges

Arthroscopic Medial Approach for Modified Double Arthrodesis of the Foot

The single medial incision subtalar joint and talonavicular joint arthrodesis has been shown to be a useful alternative for the correction of hindfoot valgus deformity. We describe an arthroscopic method of joint preparation using this approach. The present case report included 6 consecutive patients aged 35 to 72 (mean ± standard deviation 55.8 ± 15.54) years (4 males [66.7%] and 2 females [33.3%]), who had undergone the medial approach for modified double arthrodesis of the foot. Of the 6 patients, 3 (50.0%) had undergone arthroscopic joint preparation and 3 (50.0%) traditional (manual) joint preparation. Osteobiologic agents were used in all patients. We found a shorter tourniquet time for the patients who had undergone an arthroscopic approach, with a mean of 110 ± 7.21 minutes, compared with a traditional joint preparation, with a mean of 121.3 ± 8.08 minutes. We also found a shorter time to radiographic union in the patients who had undergone an arthroscopic approach, all of whom showed signs of union at 6 weeks. Only 2 of the 3 patients in the traditional joint preparation group had achieved union at a mean of 10 ± 2.83 weeks, with 1 case resulting in nonunion. This technique could be a viable alternative to traditional methods of joint preparation by decreasing the operative time and improving the union rates.

Does autogenous bone graft work? A logistic regression analysis of data from 159 papers in the foot and ankle literature

BACKGROUND

While autogenous cancellous iliac crest bone graft is the gold standard for foot and ankle surgery, it lacks Level I evidence. Although one third of all graft cases performed in the United States today rely on allograft, some surgeons believe no graft is necessary. We hypothesized that a systematic review of the foot and ankle literature would reveal that (1) autogenous bone graft during foot and ankle arthrodesis would demonstrate healing rates that were superior to the use of either using allograft or no bone graft at all, and (2) these differences would be even more dramatic in patients having risk factors that impair bone healing. To our knowledge, neither of these assessments to date has ever been performed with this body of literature. The goal of this study was to review the use and union rates of bone graft during foot and ankle arthrodesis and determine if autogenous bone graft was superior.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to include articles between 1959 and 2012 using autograft, allograft, and/or no bone graft for foot and/or ankle arthrodesis. Case reports involving fewer than four patients, investigations failing to incorporate outcome data, those involving orthobiologic augmentation, and those including vascularized graft, xenograft, or pediatric patients were excluded. Recorded search results included patient demographics, comorbidities, pre-operative diagnosis, surgical procedure, bone graft type and indication, union rate, method of fixation, patient satisfaction, all outcome scores, definition of healing/success, and any listed complications including revision. Final data were stratified based upon the type of graft material.

RESULTS

This search generated 953 related articles, of which 159 studies (5327 patients) met inclusion criteria. The majority (153/159) were retrospective case series. Systematic review demonstrated a trend toward higher union rates for cancellous autograft (OR 1.39, p=0.11), structural autograft (OR 1.52, p=0.09), and cancellous allograft (OR 1.31, p=0.52) relative to no graft material, but none reached statistical significance. Compared to no graft, structural allograft trended toward worse performance (OR 0.62, p=0.17). The overall probability of union was 93.7% for cancellous autograft, 94.2% for structural autograft, 93.3% for cancellous allograft, 91.4% for no graft, and 86.9% for structural allograft. When only comparing the 19 papers that included a no graft arm (91.9% union rate), data revealed the highest union using cancellous autograft (95.1%, OR 1.73, p=0.09) and structural autograft (96.3%, OR 2.33, p=0.06) while only 76% for structural allograft. No significant statistical association existed between union rates and other recorded variables.

CONCLUSION

Systematic analysis of bone graft use in foot and ankle fusions favors the use of autograft and cancellous allograft for optimized healing rates, although no differences were statistically significant. If we assume that graft material been chosen for more complex procedures having lower anticipated union rates, then these data lend further support to the use of autograft and cancellous allograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Mid- to long-term outcome of 96 corrective hindfoot fusions in 84 patients with rigid flatfoot deformity

Talonavicular and subtalar joint fusion through a medial incision (modified triple arthrodesis) has become an increasingly popular technique for treating symptomatic flatfoot deformity caused by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to look at its clinical and radiological mid- to long-term outcomes, including the rates of recurrent flatfoot deformity, nonunion and avascular necrosis of the dome of the talus. A total of 84 patients (96 feet) with a symptomatic rigid flatfoot deformity caused by posterior tibial tendon dysfunction were treated using a modified triple arthrodesis. The mean age of the patients was 66 years (35 to 85) and the mean follow-up was 4.7 years (1 to 8.3). Both clinical and radiological outcomes were analysed retrospectively. In 86 of the 95 feet (90.5%) for which radiographs were available, there was no loss of correction at final follow-up. In all, 14 feet (14.7%) needed secondary surgery, six for nonunion, two for avascular necrosis, five for progression of the flatfoot deformity and tibiotalar arthritis and one because of symptomatic overcorrection. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Hindfoot score (AOFAS score) at final follow-up was 67 (between 16 and 100) and the mean visual analogue score for pain 2.4 points (between 0 and 10). In conclusion, modified triple arthrodesis provides reliable correction of deformity and a good clinical outcome at mid- to long-term follow-up, with nonunion as the most frequent complication. Avascular necrosis of the talus is a rare but serious complication of this technique.

Medial approach to the subtalar joint: anatomy, indications, technique tips

The medial approach to the subtalar joint allows good visualization of the articular surfaces. Compared with the lateral approach, advantages are found particularly in flatfoot correction, in which the single-incision technique can be used for corrective fusions of rigid flatfoot deformity. Union rates are comparable with the traditional lateral approach; however, wound healing problems occur less frequently. Avascular necrosis of the talus is a rare but serious complication, although frequency seems to be independent of the approach chosen. Clinical studies showed no increased morbidity when comparing the medial to the lateral approach.

Arthrodiastasis of the lateral column with medial fusion: a retrospective examination of medial double and Lapidus arthrodeses

Arthrodiastasis of the calcaneocuboid joint after medial double arthrodesis has been described, but the extent remains unreported. We present our comparative findings after medial double and Lapidus fusion on the effects of the calcaneocuboid joint. Adults undergoing medial column fusion with internal fixation and a minimal clinical and radiographic follow-up period of 3 months were included. Subjects were excluded for Charcot deformity, previous arthrodesis surgery, and history of calcaneocuboid joint trauma or surgery. Although 52 patients were identified, 32 (mean age 56.69 ± 12.56 years; 11 males) met the study criteria (15 medial double and 17 Lapidus procedures). The height of the calcaneocuboid joint on the lateral radiograph and width of the calcaneocuboid joint on the anteroposterior radiograph were measured postoperatively and fixed, given the overlap often noted preoperatively in flatfoot deformities. The joint depth was measured at 3 points and averaged both preoperatively and postoperatively on lateral and anteroposterior radiographs. The volume of the calcaneocuboid joint (mm(3)) was the primary endpoint. Medial column fusion elicited a statistically significant mean increase of 32% in calcaneocuboid joint diastasis (p < .001). The percent change in diastasis volume was statistically different between the medial double (61.90% ± 40.59%) and the Lapidus (5.71% ± 14.84%, p < .001) fusion procedures. These results confirmed our hypothesis that arthrodesis of the more proximal medial column joints would produce greater lateral column arthrodiastasis. Adding to the published data, medial double arthrodesis increased the volume of the calcaneocuboid joint by 62%.

Triple arthrodesis: tips and tricks to navigate trouble

Triple arthrodesis is a powerful corrector of hindfoot deformity related to trauma, rheumatoid arthritis, and long-standing peritalar subluxation with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. To avoid the common postoperative complications related to triple arthrodesis, one must be meticulous in preoperative evaluation as well as surgical technique. Presented are some tips and tricks to avoid the common complications and provide the patient with a plantigrade, stable foot, as well as some salvage options for triple arthrodesis in a malunited position.

Double arthrodesis through a medial approach for end-stage adult-acquired flatfoot

Triple arthrodesis has traditionally been the procedure of choice for end-stage adult-acquired flatfoot. The results have been universally good, and it has proven to be dependable and predictable. Nonetheless, complications have been reported following triple arthrodesis in certain patients. Selective arthrodesis of the talonavicular joint and subtalar joint through a single medial approach has been developed as an alternative. The authors especially prefer this procedure with severe transverse plane deformity and often choose this approach as an alternative to triple arthrodesis in high-risk patients, including those patients with diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, long-term steroid use, and the elderly.

Anatomical evaluation of different approaches for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

The transfibular approach is commonly used for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. However, the medial and the posterolateral approaches are available as alternatives. The present study was performed to assess the effects of the 3 approaches on the neurovascular structures encountered and to quantify the extent of cartilage in the different joint compartments that could be surgically debrided.

METHODS

This cadaver study was performed in 6 pairs of formalin-fixed legs (mean donor age: 80 years; 4 females, 2 males). For each approach, 4 specimens were selected. The neurovascular structures at risk and the debrided portions of the articular cartilage were compared.

RESULTS

Arterial structures were least compromised by the transfibular approach. The posterolateral approach was particularly likely to damage the lateral malleolar branches of the peroneal artery. Venous structures were at risk mainly from the medial approach, which was also the most risk-bearing of the 3 approaches in terms of nerve damage. The proportions of cartilage-debrided joint surfaces of the tibia in the ankle joint, and of the talus and the calcaneus in the subtalar joint, did not differ notably. The proportions of debrided surfaces of the talus in the ankle joint differed notably among the 3 approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

The medial approach could be a valid alternative to the lateral transfibular approach for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Care should be taken, however, to prevent damage to the saphenous nerve and other neurological structures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Access morbidity and feasibility of adequate cartilage debridement are relevant to the clinical outcome of hindfoot arthrodesis.

A retrospective comparison of cost and efficiency of the medial double and dual incision triple arthrodeses

While the medial double arthrodesis has gained significant popularity for hindfoot arthrodesis in recent years, much has been touted about the efficiency and cost savings of the procedure in comparison to its triple counterpart without any literature to reinforce this claim. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the hardware costs and operative time between the medial double and triple arthrodeses. A total of 276 patients (277 feet) were identified via CPT codes with 47 hindfoot cases (47 feet) meeting the inclusion criteria consisting of 21 medial double (6 males, 15 females) and 26 triple (8 males, 18 females) arthrodeses. No significant difference was noted in age, body mass index, gender, chronic steroid use, preoperative osteopenia/osteoporosis, tobacco abuse, surgical side, presence of diabetes, immune compromised state, kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, or liver disease. Mean medial double operative (OR) time 106 ± 31 minutes (range = 73-201 minutes) with a procedure time of 84 ± 29 minutes (range = 44-163 minutes) was identified versus an OR time of 127 ± 23 minutes (range = 91-200 minutes) and procedure time of 104 ± 23 minutes (range = 50-169 minutes) for the triple arthrodesis group. The mean fixation cost for the triple arthrodesis was found to be higher with the mean triple hardware cost $2932.75 ± $736.60 (range = $1434.00 to $3980.00) against the medial double's $1197.59 ± $635.57 (range = $463.20 to $2019.00). Both efficiency and cost were found to favor the medial double for hindfoot arthrodesis at a level of statistical significance level (P = .0028 for OR time, P = .0033 for procedure time, and P < .0001 for cost).

Radiologic morphology of the calcaneus: a study of radiologic angles in a pediatric population

BACKGROUND

The Fowler-Philip, calcaneal pitch, and total calcaneal angles define the radiologic morphology of the rearfoot. We studied these angles in healthy adolescents.

METHODS

We studied 141 feet. Patients with inflammatory or traumatic injuries were excluded. The mean participant age was 11.5 years. The Fowler-Philip, calcaneal pitch, and total calcaneal angles were measured on lateral weightbearing radiographs. The statistics included descriptive, sample size (α=0.05 and β=0.20), the Student t test, and analysis of variance; P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The samples were 141 and 35 radiographs for the Fowler-Philip and calcaneal pitch angles, respectively. Ninety percent, 25.1%, and 97.4% of the adolescents had normal Fowler-Philip, calcaneal pitch, and total calcaneal angles, respectively. In addition, 9.9%, 74.9%, and 2.6% of the values were outside the reference ranges, respectively. The Fowler-Philip angle decreased and the calcaneal pitch angle increased significantly with age (P = .0005). The total calcaneal angle did not change with age (P = .65).

CONCLUSIONS

The mean angle values in a pediatric population did not differ from those in adults. We found a high percentage of calcaneal pitch angles outside the reference range. Age influenced the Fowler-Philip and calcaneal pitch angles but not the total calcaneal angle.

HINTEGRA Revision Arthroplasty for Failed Total Ankle Prostheses: Surgical Technique

Introduction

In our experience, revision ankle arthroplasty with a three-component total ankle prosthesis following a failed total ankle replacement has provided encouraging midterm results with substantial pain relief while preserving the range of motion of the replaced ankle.

Step 1 Preoperative Assessment and Planning

Determine the treatment using a decision algorithm.

Step 2 Patient Positioning

Use spinal or general anesthesia, administer intravenous antibiotics, position the patient supine, and apply a tourniquet.

Step 3 Surgical Approach to the Failed Prosthesis

Use an anterior approach to expose the failed ankle prosthesis.

Step 4 Removal of the Prosthesis

Remove the polyethylene insert, the talar component, and the tibial component, making sure to not compromise any remaining bone stock.

Step 5 Revision Ankle Arthroplasty

Prepare the tibial and talar bone stock to obtain solid osseous surfaces, and use the appropriate prosthetic components.

Step 6 Additional SurgicalProcedures If Necessary

If necessary, perform arthrodesis of adjacent joints, correcting osteotomies of the distal parts of the tibia and fibula, calcaneal osteotomy, and/or ligamentoplasty.

Step 7 Closure of All Incisions

Close all incisions.

Step 8 Postoperative Care

A short leg splint is worn for two days, followed by partial weight-bearing; the ankle is protected in a splint at night and with a walking boot during the day for six to eight weeks.

Results

Between 2000 and 2010, 117 ankles in 116 patients (fifty-six female and sixty male; mean age, 55.0 ± 12.0 years) who presented with a failed total ankle arthroplasty after a mean of 4.3 ± 3.9 years were treated by revision arthroplasty with use of the HINTEGRA three-component total ankle prosthesis¹².

What to Watch For

IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.

Vascular disruption of the talus: comparison of two approaches for triple arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

For triple arthrodesis, a single medial incision has been proposed to avoid lateral wound complications and has demonstrated satisfactory fusion rates. This study aimed to compare the disruption to the arterial supply of the talus between the single-medial-incision approach and the 2-incision approach.

METHODS

The 2 approaches for triple arthrodesis were compared by analyzing the disruption of arterial vasculature in 14 cadaveric specimens in randomized fashion. The arterial disruption was determined using CT angiography before and after surgery combined with analysis from dissection. The area of joint preparation from each technique was also analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The single-medial-incision approach caused a high incidence of damage to the deltoid artery (6 of 7 specimens, 86%) and the artery of the tarsal canal (7 of 7 specimens, 100%). The 2-incision approach resulted in damage to the artery of the tarsal sinus in all specimens (7 of 7 specimens, 100%), but the medial vasculature was spared given the limited dissection required to access the talonavicular joint. Through the single-medial-incision approach the percentage of debridement of the calcaneocuboid joint (36%) was significantly lower than the debridement using the 2-incision approach (85%, P < .01). There was no significant difference in joint preparation of the talonavicular and subtalar joints between the 2 approaches with the number of specimens available.

CONCLUSION

From this cadaveric study, we found that both approaches could result in substantial disruption of the main blood supply to the talus. The single-medial-incision approach consistently disrupted the majority of blood supply to the talar body, while the 2-incision approach caused various degrees of vascular disruption to the talar head and neck. Using the single-medial-incision approach, the calcaneocuboid joint did not show adequate removal of articular cartilage due to difficulty accessing the joint surfaces.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Vascular sparing to the talus should be considered when selecting an appropriate operative approach for triple arthrodesis. Although the clinical significance of this cadaveric study is limited, the 2-incision approach appeared to cause less vascular disruption to the talar body while allowing more complete joint preparation.

Kinematic changes in patients with double arthrodesis of the hindfoot for realignment of planovalgus deformity

Double fusion (i.e., fusion of the subtalar and talonavicular joint) represents a modification of triple arthrodesis preserving integrity of the calcaneocuboidal joint. Our aims were (1) to evaluate dynamic plantar pressure distribution in patients undergoing double arthrodesis, (2) to obtain a comparison of kinematic changes to healthy feet, (3) to evaluate the influence of radiographic alignment, and (4) to assess functional outcome. Sixteen feet (14 patients) treated by double fusion due to fixed planovalgus deformity were included. Dynamic plantar pressure distribution was assessed using a capacitive pressure platform. Results were compared with a demographically matched control group. Clinical assessment included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and radiographic assessment included measurement of talometatarsal, calcaneal pitch, and talocalcaneal (TC) angle on lateral radiographs. Significant differences in plantar pressure distribution were found for maximum force of the hindfoot, midfoot, and big toe region: While the hindfoot and hallux represented decreased load in the double arthrodesis patients, load increased in the midfoot region compared with healthy controls. The lateral talus-first metatarsal-angle increased from -16.3° to -8.2°, and the TC angle decreased from 41.3° to 35.8° (p < 0.05). The pre- and post-operative AOFAS score increased from 37 points (SD, 16.3) to 70 points (SD, 16.7). These results revealed that double arthrodesis represents a reliable method for correction of planovalgus deformity. Compared with healthy feet, force transmission of the midfoot is increased whereas push-off force decreases.

Single-incision medial approach for double arthrodesis of hindfoot in posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Triple arthrodesis through a 2-incision approach has been the primary salvage procedure for rigid hindfoot malalignment resulting from posterior tibialis dysfunction. However, complications like calcaneocuboid joint nonunion, lateral wound dehiscence, and adjacent joint arthritis have been reported after triple arthrodesis. Hence we adopted single-incision medial approach arthrodesis of subtalar and talonavicular joints, sparing the uninvolved calcaneocuboid joint and lateral skin.

METHOD

We report the results of a series of 18 feet with posterior tibialis dysfunction that had correction of malalignment by this approach. Mean age at surgery was 65 years. The mean follow-up was 24 months.

RESULTS

There was statistically significant improvement in all the radiological parameters measured. There were no wound-related complications. The union rate was 89%. There were 2 malunions, and 2 feet developed valgus ankle deformity. The overall satisfaction rate among patients was 78%.

CONCLUSION

We present a case series of treatment of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction by arthrodesis of the subtalar and talonavicular joints through an isolated medial approach. The results were not encouraging enough to recommend adopting this approach as an alternative to triple arthrodesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Techniques for managing varus and valgus malalignment during total ankle replacement

The ultimate goal of primary total ankle replacement is to provide a well-balanced soft-tissue envelope around a well-aligned, well-fixated implant. Some surgeons have emphasized that good outcomes in total ankle replacement are more dependent on ligament balancing, along with the procedure itself, than the extent of preoperative coronal deformity in the ankle. Thus, it is imperative that the surgeon be familiar with additional procedures to address the varus, valgus, and other associated deformities commonly encountered in primary total ankle replacement.

Management of the rigid arthritic flatfoot in adults: triple arthrodesis

The traditional surgical treatment for adults with a rigid, arthritic flatfoot is a dual-incision triple arthrodesis. Over time, this procedure has proved to be reliable and reproducible in obtaining successful deformity correction through fusion and good clinical results. However, the traditional dual-incision triple arthrodesis is not without shortcomings. Early complications include lateral wound problems, malunion, and nonunion. Long-term follow-up of patients after a triple arthrodesis has shown that many develop adjacent joint arthritis at the ankle or midfoot. This particular problem should be considered an expected consequence, rather than a failure of the procedure. Although the indications for and surgical techniques used in triple arthrodesis have evolved and improved with time (predictably improving results in the intermediate term), the triple arthrodesis should be regarded as a salvage procedure. Certain measures can be taken by the surgeon to avoid some problems. If patients are at risk for lateral wound complications, the arthrodesis could be performed through a single medial incision. However, this can make some aspects of the CC fusion more difficult. Implants would have to be inserted percutaneously, which prevents the surgeon from using either staples or plates. If a patient were to need a lateral column lengthening through a CC distraction fusion, this would not be possible medially. If either the ST or CC joints have minimal degenerative changes, they could be spared through a double or modified double arthrodesis, respectively. Although these procedures that deviate from the traditional triple arthrodesis offer promise, further study is required to better define their role in treatment of the rigid, arthritic AAFD. Triple arthrodesis is, by no means, a simple surgery. It requires preoperative planning, meticulous preparation of bony surfaces, cognizance of hindfoot positioning, and rigidity of fixation. The procedure also requires enough experience on the part of the operating surgeon to anticipate postoperative problems and provide modifications in traditional technique for certain patients.

Medial approach for hindfoot arthrodesis with a valgus deformity

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of valgus deformity of the hindfoot has traditionally been via a lateral incision, often complicated by wound healing problems and sural nerve damage. Potential advantages of a medial approach especially for a valgus deformity include excellent wound healing, no risk of damage to the sural nerve and extensibility of the approach to include additional procedures such as navicular fusion or tendon transfer if indicated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present a retrospective review of 18 consecutive patients with valgus deformity of the hindfoot, all undergoing arthrodesis via a medial approach. Indications included osteoarthritis, tibialis posterior dysfucntion, post-traumatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.

RESULTS

All wounds healed by primary intention and there were no postoperative neurovascular complications. The mean preoperative subtalar valgus deformity was 32 (range, 12 to 49) degrees, which was improved to mean postoperative valgus deformity of 17 (range, 10 to 25) degrees. Fusion following the primary surgery was achieved in all but one of the patients (a heavy smoker and post-traumatic arthritis), with the mean time to fusion being 5.6 months.

CONCLUSION

We provide further evidence to support previous documentation in the literature that the medial approach for the correction of hindfoot valgus deformity can be successfully used to achieve excellent exposure of the subtalar joint in order to correct the valgus deformity, avoiding the risks of wound healing and nerve damage associated with a lateral approach.

[Injuries and dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon]

The function of the posterior tibial (PT) tendon is to stabilize the hindfoot against valgus and eversion forces. It functions as the primary invertor of the foot and assists the Achilles tendon in plantar flexion. The PT tendon is a stance phase muscle, firing from heel strike to shortly after heel lift-off. It decelerates subtalar joint pronation after heel contact. It functions as a powerful subtalar joint supinator and as a support of the medial longitudinal arch. The action of the tendon travels to the transverse tarsal joints, locking them and allowing the gastrocnemius to support heel rise. Acute injuries of the PT tendon are rare and mostly affect the active middle-aged patient or they are the result of complex injuries to the ankle joint complex. Dysfunction of the PT tendon following degeneration and rupture, in contrast, has shown an increasing incidence in recent years. To which extent changed lifestyle, advancing age, comorbidities, and obesity play a role has not yet been clarified in detail. Dysfunction of the PT tendon results in progressive destabilization of the hind- and midfoot. Clinically, the ongoing deformation of the foot can be classified into four stages: in stage 1, the deformity is distinct and fully correctable; in stage II, the deformity is obvious, but still correctable; in stage III, the deformity has become stiff; and in stage IV, the ankle joint is also involved in the deformity. Treatment modalities depend on stage: while conservative measures may work in stage I, surgical treatment is mandatory for the later stages. Reconstructive surgery is advised in stage II, whereas in stage III and IV correcting and stabilizing arthrodeses are advised. A promising treatment option for stage IV may be adding an ankle prosthesis to a triple arthrodesis, as long as the remaining competence of the deltoid ligament is sufficient. An appropriate treatment is mandatory to avoid further destabilization and deformation of the foot. Failures of treatment result mostly from underestimation of the problem or insufficient treatment of existing instability and deformity.

Subtalar and naviculocuneiform fusion for extended breakdown of the medial arch

Combined subtalar and naviculocuneiform fusion was successful in restoring the longitudinal medial arch after extended breakdown while preserving the talon avicular joint. This surgical technique was shown to give a reliable fusion and biomechanically stable position of the foot. In this review article, we summarize the medial column procedures for flatfoot deformity and present our surgical technique and results of 10 consecutive patients treated with this method at a minimum 1-year follow-up.