Osteolysis in the well-fixed socket

20-year Results of a 3D Titanium Mesh Coating Stability of 31 Artificial Cups

BACKGROUND

The aim of this work was to demonstrate the bony bond strength and resilience of a three-dimensional titanium mesh coating of an artificial acetabulum produced using the diffusion bonding technique. Under the extreme conditions ranging from abrasion-related osteolysis to acetabular perforation, the degree of residual bone and the integrity of the coating were determined. The remaining zones of the (still) stable bone connection are inevitably exposed to a greater load of the layer adhesion between the titanium mesh and the core shell. The investigation was intended to provide information about the stages of damage according to Paprosky in which it was still justifiable to leave the implant in place and simply change the inlay from the purely material-technical point of view of a stable coating. The bond between bone and implant was examined with regard to a possible retention of the implant for its adaptive remodeling up to 27 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study, 31 explanted human acetabular cups of the Harris-Galante II type, with an average lifetime of 19.7 years (11-27 years), were examined by means of digital area measurement to determine both the bone areas remaining on the coating and the damaged areas of the titanium mesh. Periacetabular bone loss was recorded in a modified Paprosky (PAP) damage classification. Full hemispherical sections of 4 acetabular cups with a life time of 16, 20, 22 and 27 years were examined histopathologically using the diamond cut technique.

RESULTS

The periacetabular bone loss resulted in damage class PAP I in 8 cases, PAP IIa in 7 cases, PAP IIb in 2 cases, PAP IIc in 9 cases, PAP IIIa in 3 cases and PAP IIIa in 2 cases PAP IIIb. The average amount of bone that was still firmly attached to the coating after explantation was 17% (0-70%) of the total cup surface. Paprosky I accounted for 44.1%, and PAP IIa and IIb stadiums together a total of 17.1%. The average bone fraction of the implants no longer anchored in the host bed at stages IIc, IIIa and IIIb was 2%. The average coating damage was 11% (0-100%) and was exclusively attributable to the unstable implants of stages IIc, IIIa and IIIb. The histopathological findings showed adaptive bone remodeling, that was detectable for up to 27 years through the titanium mesh down to the interface with the solid acetabular core. The titanium wire mesh was mostly surrounded by lamellar, mature bone.

CONCLUSION

The results show that the connection between the Tivanium cup and the previously oldest and unchanged sintered coating - in the form of a three-dimensional titanium mesh applied in point and line contact - is very load-resistant even under the extreme loads of periacetabular osteolysis and cup perforations. Since there was no damage to the coating in periacetabular damage stages Paprosky I, IIa and IIb, it is justifiable in these damage stages to leave the implant in situ and to continue to use it with sole replacement of the inlay, but leaving the socket shell. The third-generation acetabular cup (Trilogy) with unchanged three-dimensional titanium mesh coating has been implanted in over 1.2 million cases for 26 years. After a long service life, an increasing number of wear and tear conditions can be expected in today's mostly elderly and vulnerable patient clientele. In view of the results presented here, the early detection of damage would make it possible to avoid costly and stressful explantation of the entire acetabular cup in favor of replacing the sole inlay in Paprosky stages I, IIa and IIb.

[Contemporary indications for aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroplasties and revision procedures will continue to rise over the next decades. In 2020 in Germany, 75% of all revision surgeries involved an exchange of at least one component; exchanges of all components were carried out in 27.5% of the revisions. The most common failure modes were aseptic loosening, infections, periprosthetic fractures, instabilities, and metal-related pathologies.

INDICATIONS

Aseptic loosening remains the most common reason for revision. However, the indications for hip arthroplasty revisions have changed over time, with a decrease in revisions due to aseptic loosening and an increase in revisions due to infection and periprosthetic fracture. The rate of dislocations remained approximately constant over the past decade, with international differences. Metal-associated pathologies will continue to play a significant role in revision hip arthroplasty.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium

Despite growing evidence supporting the evaluation, classification, and treatment of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement, advancements have not been systematically incorporated into a single document, and therefore, a comprehensive review of the treatment of severe acetabular bone loss is needed. The Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center at Hospital for Special Surgery held an Acetabular Bone Loss Symposium on June 21, 2019, to answer the following questions: What are the trends, emerging technologies, and areas of future research related to the evaluation and management of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement? What constitutes the optimal workup and management strategies for acetabular bone loss? The 36 international experts convened were divided into groups, each assigned to discuss 1 of 4 topics: (1) preoperative planning and postoperative assessment; (2) implant selection, management of osteolysis, and management of massive bone loss; (3) the treatment challenges of pelvic discontinuity, periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and poor bone biology; and (4) the principles of reconstruction and classification of acetabular bone loss. Each group came to consensus, when possible, based on an extensive literature review. This document provides an overview of these 4 areas, the consensus each group arrived at, and directions for future research.

Isolated Acetabular Liner Exchange for Polyethylene Wear and Osteolysis with Well-Fixed Metal Shell

Background

The isolated liner and head exchange procedure has been an established treatment method for polyethylene wear and osteolysis when the acetabular component remains well fixed. In this study, the mid-term results of this procedure were evaluated retrospectively.

Methods

Among the consecutive patients operated on from September 1995, two patients (three hips) were excluded because of inadequate follow-up, and the results of remaining 34 patients (34 hips) were evaluated. There were 20 men and 14 women with a mean age of 49 years. A conventional polyethylene liner was used in 26 cases and a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner was used in eight cases. In three cases, the liner was cemented in a metal shell because a compatible liner could not be used.

Results

After a follow-up of 5 to 20.2 years, re-revision surgery was necessary in 10 cases (29.4%): in eight for wear and osteolysis at 55 to 101 months after liner exchange and in two for acetabular loosening at 1 and 1.5 years after liner exchange. Re-revision surgery included all component revision (four cases), cup revision (four cases), and liner exchange (two cases). In all re-revision cases, a conventional polyethylene liner was used initially. There was no failure in the cases in which a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner was used.

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that isolated acetabular liner exchange is a reasonable option for wear and osteolysis when the metal shell is well fixed. More promising long-term results are expected with the use of highly cross-linked polyethylene liners.

MOTS-c inhibits Osteolysis in the Mouse Calvaria by affecting osteocyte-osteoclast crosstalk and inhibiting inflammation

The Mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c has recently been reported as a 16-amino acid peptide regulating metabolism and homeostasis in different cells. However, its effects on immune cells and bone metabolism are rarely reported. Here we demonstrate that MOTS-c treatment in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) particle-induced osteolysis mouse model alleviated bone erosion and inflammation. MOTS-c increased osteoprotegerin (OPG)/ receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) ratio in osteocytes, leading to inhibition of osteoclastogenesis. In primary bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) MOTS-c alleviated STAT1 and NF-κB phosphorylation triggered by UHMWPE particles. Promoting ROS production or suppressing peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) coactivator-1α (PGC-1α) by adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) repression blocked these anti-inflammatory effects of MOTS-c treatment. Taken together, these findings provide evidence that the small peptide inhibits osteoclastogenesis by regulating osteocyte OPG/RANKL secretion and suppressing inflammation via restraining NF-κB and STAT1 pathway. Moreover, its effects on NF-κB activation is dependent on the AMPK-PGC-1α-ROS axis, suggesting its potential use in osteolysis and other inflammation disorders.

Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Acetabular Osteolysis After Total Hip Arthroplasty

As the demand for total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to increase, the burden of revision THA is also expected to increase. Although the quality of polyethylene has improved markedly, osteolysis continues to be a risk for older designs and younger, active patients. Although progressive but typically asymptomatic in early stages, osteolysis can result in component failure and complicate revision surgery. Serial radiographs are paramount for monitoring progression. Although select cases may be treated with observation, surgery should be considered based on age, activity level, and projected life span. Well-fixed, noncemented modular acetabular components may be treated with curettage and bone grafting, as well as having to bear liner exchange with retention of the acetabular shell. However, in the setting of osteolysis, it is controversial whether bone grafting and component retention is superior to cup revision. This review explores the pathophysiology of osteolysis after THA and provides a comprehensive analysis of the evaluation and treatment of patients with osteolysis.

Survivorship of a Porous Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular Component in Primary Hip Arthroplasty With a Mean Follow-Up of 18 Years

BACKGROUND

The use of porous tantalum for the acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) has demonstrated excellent short-term and midterm results. However, long-term data are scarce. The purpose of this prospective study is to report the long-term clinical and radiologic outcome following use of an uncemented porous tantalum acetabular component in primary THA with a minimum follow-up of 17.5 years, in a previously studied cohort of patients.

METHODS

We prospectively followed 128 consecutive primary THAs in 140 patients, between November 1997 and June 1999. A press-fit porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component was used in all cases. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of 18.1 years (range, 17.5-19 years).

RESULTS

Mean age of patients at the time of operation was 60.4 years. Harris hip score, Oxford hip score, and range of motion were dramatically improved in all cases (P < .001). At last follow-up, all cups were radiographically stable with no evidence of migration, gross polyethylene wear, progressive radiolucencies, osteolytic lesions, or acetabular fractures. The survivorship with reoperation for any reason as end point was 92.8% and the survivorship for aseptic loosening as an end point was 100%.

CONCLUSION

The porous tantalum monoblock cup in primary THA demonstrated excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes with no failures because of aseptic loosening at a mean follow-up of 18.1 years.

Cup revision involving retention of a fixed but malpositioned acetabular component in patients with poor general conditions

This study evaluated the surgical technique and outcomes of cup revision involving retention of a fixed but malpositioned acetabular component in patients with poor general conditions.Between 2007 and 2013, we performed cup revision on 12 hips while retaining a fixed (either cemented or uncemented) but malpositioned acetabular component. Indications for this technique were: malpositioned but fixed acetabular shell; sufficient space for the insertion of the prosthesis; and patients with poor general conditions. After intraoperative confirmation of shell stability, a replacement liner was oriented in a new plane. Clinical and imaging data were collected perioperatively and during follow-up for evaluation of surgical efficacy.No intraoperative complications were encountered. Mean operative duration was 70.4 minutes (range, 45-90 minutes) and mean estimated blood loss was 729 mL (range, 400-1200 mL). Mean follow-up duration was 5.1 years (range, 2.5-8.5 years). Average visual analog scale score decreased from (7.08 ± 1.00) preoperatively to (1.42 ± 0.67) at final follow-up (P < .05). Average Harris Hip Score improved from (14.7 ± 6.58) preoperatively to (80.9 ± 5.30) at final follow-up (P < .05). Anteversions and inclinations of new liners were (15.1 ± 2.3)° and (46.4 ± 3.9)° respectively. Postoperative radiographs showed no signs of prosthesis loosening, periprosthetic fractures, or dislocation compared with preoperatively.The short-term efficacy of cup revision with retention of a malpositioned but fixed acetabular component was satisfactory.