Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgery

Upper Extremity Blocks for Hand Surgeons: A Literature Review of Regional Anaesthesia Techniques, Efficacy, and Safety

Introduction: Regional anaesthesia (RA) techniques have increased in popularity due to evidence of reductions in acute pain, chronic pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and pulmonary complications. While upper extremity blocks (UEBs) have been the subject of several comprehensive reviews, no review to date has synthesised the information on their use in hand surgery. Methods: A search of PUBMED and Cochrane databases was performed to identify the evidence associated with upper extremity blocks. The results of this search and extant literature on UEBs were examined and the relevant information extracted. Results: Supraclavicular block is associated with transient complications such as Horner's syndrome and phrenic nerve palsy, affecting up to 54% and 50% of patients, respectively. The incidence of pneumothorax in supraclavicular blocks is up to 4%. Infraclavicular, interscalene and axillary blocks have a lower rate of all complications, however, each may require a supplementary block at a different anatomical site as each spares significant regions of the upper extremity. Epinephrine in concentrations of 1:100,000-200,000 is safe for use in digital blocks with no association digital gangrene. Current evidence suggests digital blocks are safe and efficacious when appropriately performed. Conclusion: UEBs are safe and may be administered by an anaesthesia provider or an appropriately trained surgeon. The choice of block is contingent on the anatomical location of the surgical procedure, procedure duration, patient preference, patient co-morbidieis, and the surgeon's experience. Most upper extremity surgeries can be performed using RA. Current evidence illustrates outcome benefits for patients, surgeons, and healthcare institutions utilising RA.

Pain Control and Satisfaction With Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Upper Extremity Surgery

BACKGROUND

Regional anesthesia ("block") is an important component of upper extremity (UE) surgery pain control. However, little is known about patient experience related to perioperative opioid use. This study assessed patient-reported pain control and satisfaction with UE blocks and evaluated how opioid consumption impacted these outcomes before the block "wore off."

METHODS

A postoperative phone survey was administered to patients who underwent outpatient UE surgery at a surgery center for more than 16 months. It assessed pain scores (scale 1-10), satisfaction with block duration (scale 1-5), duration until return of UE function, and opioid consumption. Analyses used Mann-Whitney U tests, Fisher exact tests, and bivariate and multivariable linear and ordered logistic regressions to understand relationships between opioid use and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 509 patients (61%) completed the survey, and 441 (88%) were satisfied with block duration. Initial and final pain scores were significantly higher in patients who took opioids prior to the block wearing off (6 and 4.5, P = .04 and 3.5 and 2, P = .002, respectively). Although satisfaction with block duration was not different in group comparisons (ie, patients who premedicated vs those who did not), in a multivariable analysis, patients who premedicated with opioids had 78% increased odds of reporting the highest level of satisfaction compared with the lower 4 levels (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Upper extremity blocks are associated with high overall patient satisfaction and postsurgical pain control. Premedicating before the block wears off may increase patient satisfaction with block duration even if pain is not notably impacted.

Risk factors for insufficient ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block

PURPOSE

Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBPB) is performed by surgeons for upper limb anesthesia; however, certain patients need additional local anesthesia. This study aimed to identify risk factors for additional local anesthetic injection requirements.

METHODS

In total, 269 patients receiving ultrasound-guided SCBPB were enrolled. Patient age, sex, body mass index, anesthetic drug dose, surgeon expertise (hand surgeon or resident), tourniquet time, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus and mental disorders), and preoperative blood pressure representing anxiety were compared between the additional local anesthesia and no additional local anesthesia groups matched for background using propensity scores. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine risk factor cut-off values with the highest predictive potential.

RESULTS

Of 269 patients, 41 (15.2%) required additional intraoperative local anesthesia. Among surgical sites, elbow surgery showed the highest prevalence of the need for additional local anesthesia (17/41, 41%). A high body mass index and high systolic blood pressure before surgery were identified as risk factors for additional intraoperative local anesthesia requirement. Furthermore, systolic blood pressure > 170 mmHg (area under the curve, 0.66) predicted the need for intraoperative local anesthesia with 36% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 37.5% positive predictive value, and 88.6% negative predictive value. The median systolic blood pressure was significantly greater in patients requiring additional local anesthesia than in those not requiring it [151 (139-171) mmHg vs. 145 (127-155) mmHg; P = 0.026].

CONCLUSION

Elbow surgery, obesity, and high systolic blood pressure (> 170 mmHg) before surgery are predictive of additional intraoperative local anesthesia requirement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III.

Efficacy of Hand Therapy After Volar Locking Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fracture in Middle-Aged to Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of hand therapy after volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures in middle-aged to elderly women.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients diagnosed with distal radius fractures who had undergone volar plate fixation were enrolled in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized into the hand therapy and independent exercise (IE) groups, in which they exercised independently under the surgeon's direction with and without hand therapy, respectively. The primary outcome was the functional outcome measured using the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire after 6 weeks. The secondary outcomes were functional outcomes measured using the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire, active and passive ranges of motion (ROMs), grip strength, key pinch strength, and pain measured on a visual analog scale. Patients were followed up in the outpatient department at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks and at 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

The Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were significantly lower in the hand therapy group at 6 weeks after surgery (12.5 vs 19.4 in the IE group). The postoperative visual analog scale pain scores were significantly lower in the hand therapy group at 2, 4, and 6 weeks (10.2 vs 17.6 in the IE group). The active ROM of the wrist flexion-extension arc at 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks; active ROM of the pronation-supination arc at 6 and 8 weeks; and passive ROM of the wrist flexion-extension arc at 2, 4, and 8 weeks were significantly greater in the hand therapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

Hand therapy improved the outcomes after volar locking plate fixation for distal radius fracture in middle-aged to elderly women at 8 weeks after surgery. No significant between-group differences were observed in any functional outcome measure at 6 months after surgery, as previously reported.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Supraclavicular vs. Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Nerve Blocks: Clinical, Pharmacological, and Anatomical Considerations

: Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have become standard of care for enhanced recovery pathways after surgery. For brachial plexus delivery of anesthesia, both supraclavicular (SC) and infraclavicular (IC) approaches have been shown to require less supplemental anesthesia, are performed more rapidly, have quicker onset time, and have lower rates of complications than other approaches (axillary, interscalene, etc.). Ultrasound-guidance is commonly utilized to improve outcomes, limit the need for deep sedation or general anesthesia, and reduce procedural complications. Given the SC and IC approaches are the most common approaches for brachial plexus blocks, the differences between the two have been critically evaluated in the present manuscript. Various studies have demonstrated slight favorability towards the IC approach from the standpoint of complications and safety. Two prospective RCTs found a higher incidence of complications in the SC approach – particularly Horner syndrome. The IC method appears to support a greater block distribution as well. Overall, both SC and IC brachial plexus nerve block approaches are the most effective and safe approaches, particularly under ultrasound-guidance. Given the success of the supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks, these techniques are an important skill set for the anesthesiologist for intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.

European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Guidelines on peri-operative use of ultrasound for regional anaesthesia (PERSEUS regional anesthesia): Peripheral nerves blocks and neuraxial anaesthesia

Nowadays, ultrasound-guidance is commonly used in regional anaesthesia (USGRA) and to locate the spinal anatomy in neuraxial analgesia. The aim of this second guideline on the PERi-operative uSE of UltraSound (PERSEUS-RA) is to provide evidence as to which areas of regional anaesthesia the use of ultrasound guidance should be considered a gold standard or beneficial to the patient. The PERSEUS Taskforce members were asked to define relevant outcomes and rank the relative importance of outcomes following the GRADE process. Whenever the literature was not able to provide enough evidence, we decided to use the RAND method with a modified Delphi process. Whenever compared with alternative techniques, the use of USGRA is considered well tolerated and effective for some nerve blocks but there are certain areas, such as truncal blocks, where a lack of robust data precludes useful comparison. The new frontiers for further research are represented by the application of USG during epidural analgesia or spinal anaesthesia as, in these cases, the evidence for the value of the use of ultrasound is limited to the preprocedure identification of the anatomy, providing the operator with a better idea of the depth and angle of the epidural or spinal space. USGRA can be considered an essential part of the curriculum of the anaesthesiologist with a defined training and certification path. Our recommendations will require considerable changes to some training programmes, and it will be necessary for these to be phased in before compliance becomes mandatory.

An Evaluation of Complications Following Ultrasound-Guided Regional Block Anesthesia in Outpatient Hand Surgery

Background: Ultrasound-guided (USG) assistance has contributed to the acceptance of regional anesthesia as a safe and efficient alternative to traditional general anesthesia. However, limited data exist regarding the safety of supraclavicular blocks used in common hand surgery procedures. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate a large sample of cases to determine the effectiveness and complication rate of supraclavicular nerve blocks and confirm the safety of its use within the ambulatory surgery center (ASC) setting. Methods: Nerve blocks for the upper extremity were performed via the supraclavicular approach using the USG technique. Records were analyzed for all patients monitored during the immediate postoperative recovery and step-down phases at the ASC and contacted by phone or evaluated within 2 weeks at their first postoperative visit. Adverse outcomes related to the regional block anesthesia were identified via phone interview or postoperative surgical visit and documented. Results: In all, 713 records were reviewed with 56% female (n = 398) and 44% male (n = 315) patients. Of the 713 cases, 4 adverse events were identified (0.6%, 95% confidence interval [%]), including 2 abnormal reactions to the nerve block and 2 incomplete blocks with inadequate pain control. Conclusions: This study is the first report to evaluate a large sample of outpatient hand procedures at a high-volume ASC. We can report no clinically significant pulmonary or neurovascular complications with the use of USG supraclavicular nerve block techniques, further supporting its establishment as a safe and efficient procedure, yielding a low complication rate.

An efficient end-to-end CNN for segmentation of bone surfaces from ultrasound

The application of ultrasound (US) imaging in orthopedic surgery has always been a research direction. However, the various problems of US imaging hinder the development of computer assisted orthopedic surgery guided by US. US bone segmentation has been an important yet challenging task for many clinical applications. We propose a new end-to-end fully convolution network called BoneNet for real-time and accurate segmentation of bone surface from US image. The BoneNet employs the squeeze-and-excitation residual to realize a robust feature learning. In order to speed up the segmentation, we reduce the convolution kernel and used depth-wise separable convolution to reduce network parameters. In addition, we assessed the impact of different normalization operations and loss functions on network performance. Finally, we realize the comparison of the segmentation performance and generalization ability of the existing real-time US bone surface segmentation network under the unified dataset. We achieved an average Dice coefficient of 93.03 % on segmentation performance test, and 91.25 % on the generalization ability test. The results show that our proposed method ensures the real-time performance and achieves significant improvements in accuracy, which substantially outperformed the state-of-the-art.

Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures under the Ultrasound-Guided Brachial Plexus Block Performed by Surgeons

Background: The upper limb surgery under the ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block is becoming popular due to its safety, effectiveness, and convenience. However, the uneven distribution of anesthesiologists become a social problem. Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block by surgeons has been widespread especially in hand surgeons. We report the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures under the ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block performed by surgeons in our hospital. Methods: The subjects were 101 patients (41 males and 60 females, average age 61.6 years) who underwent surgery for distal radius fractures under ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block administered by orthopedists at our university or related facilities between January 2014 and June 2016. Brachial plexus block was administered through the supraclavicular approach. The time from initiation of anesthesia to initiation of surgery, mean operative time, the presence or absence of additional anesthesia (local infiltration anesthesia, intravenous anesthesia, and general anesthesia), and complications were evaluated. Results: The mean time from brachial plexus block to initiation of surgery was 35.7 (20-68) minutes, and the mean operative time was 90.5 (35-217) minutes. Surgery was completed with brachial plexus block alone in 62 patients (61.4%), and additional anesthesia was necessary in 39 patients (38.6%). Furthermore, general anesthesia was employed in 6 patients (5.9%). No serious complications occurred. Conclusions: According to our results, the operation could be completed with brachial plexus block alone and additional local infiltration anesthesia or intravenous anesthesia in 94.1% (95 cases). However, 6 cases (5.9%) shifted to general anesthesia. Although it needs training, we consider that hand surgery including distal radius fractures treatment under the ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block is possible. On the other hand, cooperation or a cooperative system with anesthesiologists is necessary for surgeons to administer this anesthesia.

Efficacy of Tramadol or Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant to Levobupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Plexus Block for Upper Limb Surgery: A Randomized Double-blinded Controlled Study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of tramadol or dexamethasone as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block in terms of onset time of complete sensory and motor blockade, duration of motor blockade, duration of analgesia, and any complication.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled trial conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology, a tertiary care hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Class I and II who were posted for upper limb surgeries were recruited. Patients were divided into two groups of thirty patients each. Group T (tramadol) received 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 100 mg tramadol, and Group D (dexamethasone) received 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 8 mg dexamethasone under ultrasound guidance. Sensory and motor block assessment was done every 2 min until the development of complete sensory and motor block till 45 min. Verbal numerical rating scale score was assessed in postoperative ward at regular intervals. Patients were followed up to check for any residual neurological deficits.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in demographic data between the two groups. The onset time of sensory and motor blockade shows no significant difference between groups. The mean time duration of motor blockade in Group T was 764.63 min and for Group D was 1150.27 min which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The duration of analgesia in Group D was 1300.83 min and in Group T was 820.47 min which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Side effects such as nausea, vomiting, pruritis, hypoxemia, and long-term neurological deficits were not reported in any of the patients in either group.

CONCLUSION

Dexamethasone 8 mg as an adjuvant to 0.5% levobupivacaine for supraclavicular brachial plexus block using ultrasound guidance increases the duration of analgesia in comparison to 100 mg tramadol and provides excellent postoperative pain-free period without any neurological deficits.

Low-Volume Brachial Plexus Block Providing Surgical Anesthesia for Distal Arm Surgery Comparing Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular, and Axillary Approach: A Randomized Observer Blind Trial

Background. Distal arm surgery is widely performed under regional anesthesia with brachial plexus block. The preponderance of evidence for the efficacy relies upon injection of local anesthetic in excess of 30 mL. We aimed to compare three different ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block techniques restricting the total volume to 20 mL. Methods. 120 patients were prospectively randomized to ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block with 20 mL ropivacaine 0.75% at either the supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or axillary level. Multiinjection technique was performed with all three approaches. Primary outcome measure was performance time. Results. Performance time and procedural pain were similar between groups. Needle passes and injection numbers were significantly reduced in the infraclavicular group (P < 0.01). Nerve visibility was significantly reduced in the axillary group (P = 0.01). Success-rate was significantly increased in the supraclavicular versus the axillary group (P < 0.025). Total anesthesia-related time was significantly reduced in the supraclavicular compared to the infraclavicular group (P < 0.01). Block duration was significantly increased in the infraclavicular group (P < 0.05). No early adverse effects occurred. Conclusion. Supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks exhibited favorable characteristics compared to the axillary block. Supraclavicular brachial plexus block with the multiinjection intracluster technique exhibited significantly reduced total anesthesia-related time and higher success rate without any early adverse events.

Upper extremity nerve block: how can benefit, duration, and safety be improved? An update

Upper extremity blocks are useful as both sole anaesthesia and/or a supplement to general anaesthesia and they further provide effective postoperative analgesia, reducing the need for opioid analgesics. There is without doubt a renewed interest among anaesthesiologists in the interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary plexus blocks with the increasing use of ultrasound guidance. The ultrasound-guided technique visualising the needle tip and solution injected reduces the risk of side effects, accidental intravascular injection, and possibly also trauma to surrounding tissues. The ultrasound technique has also reduced the volume needed in order to gain effective block. Still, single-shot plexus block, although it produces effective anaesthesia, has a limited duration of postoperative analgesia and a number of adjuncts have been tested in order to prolong analgesia duration. The addition of steroids, midazolam, clonidine, dexmedetomidine, and buprenorphine has been studied, all being off-label when administered by perineural injection, and the potential neurotoxicity needs further study. The use of perineural catheters is an effective option to improve and prolong the postoperative analgesic effect.

Upper extremity plexus blocks have an obvious place as a sole anaesthetic technique or as a powerful complement to general anaesthesia, reducing the need for analgesics and hypnotics intraoperatively, and provide effective early postoperative pain relief. Continuous perineural infusion is an effective option to prolong the effects and improve postoperative quality.

Intra-articular and portal infiltration versus wrist block for analgesia after arthroscopy of the wrist: a prospective RCT

Wrist block has been used to provide pain relief for many procedures on the hand and wrist but its role in arthroscopy of the wrist remains unexplored. Chondrotoxicity has been a concern with the intra-articular infiltration of local anaesthetic. We aimed to evaluate and compare the analgesic effect of portal and wrist joint infiltration with a wrist block on the pain experienced by patients after arthroscopy of the wrist. A prospective, randomised, double-blind trial was designed and patients undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist under general anaesthesia as a day case were recruited for the study. Levo-bupivacaine was used for both techniques. The effects were evaluated using a ten-point visual analogue scale, and the use of analgesic agents was also compared. The primary outcomes for statistical analyses were the mean pain scores and the use of analgesia post-operatively. A total of 34 patients (63% females) were recruited to the portal and joint infiltration group and 32 patients (59% males) to the wrist block group. Mean age was 40.8 years in the first group and 39.7 years in the second group (p > 0.05). Both techniques provided effective pain relief in the first hour and 24 hours post-operatively but wrist block gave better pain scores at bedtime on the day of surgery (p = 0.007) and at 24 hours post-operatively (p = 0.006). Wrist block provides better and more reliable analgesia in patients undergoing arthroscopy of the wrist without exposing patients to the risk of chondrotoxicity.