Total hip arthroplasty following failure of core decompression and tantalum rod implantation

Partial femoral head replacement: a new innovative hip-preserving approach for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head and its finite element analysis

Purpose: Controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment for stage III Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This study presents, for the first time, the precise treatment of stage III ONFH using the "substitute the beam for a pillar" technique and performs a comparative finite element analysis with other hip-preserving procedures. Methods: A formalin-preserved femur of male cadavers was selected to obtain the CT scan data of femur. The proximal femur model was reconstructed and assembled using Mimics 20.0, Geomagic, and UG-NX 12.0 software with four different implant types: simple core decompression, fibula implantation, porous tantalum rod implantation, and partial replacement prosthesis. The finite element simulations were conducted to simulate the normal walking gait, and the stress distribution and displacement data of the femur and the implant model were obtained. Results: The peak von Mises stress of the femoral head and proximal femur in the partial replacement of the femoral head (PRFH) group were 22.8 MPa and 37.4 MPa, respectively, which were 3.1%-38.6% and 12.8%-37.4% lower than those of the other three surgical methods. Conclusion: The PRFH group exhibits better mechanical performance, reducing stress and displacement in the ONFH area, thus maintaining femoral head stability. Among the four hip-preserving approaches, from a biomechanical perspective, PRFH offers a new option for treating ONFH.

Comparative analysis of surgical interventions for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Despite several surgical options, there remains no consensus regarding the optimal approach for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), a prevalent and refractory disease. To determine the most suitable treatment modality, we compared randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated multiple surgical treatments for ONFH using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

The outcomes of 11 different surgical treatments were assessed using NMA comparisons of the rate of progression of femoral head necrosis, the rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty, and improvement of the Harris hip score (HHS). A random effects model was used to analyze the odds ratio (OR) or mean difference, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool for randomized trials. The confidence of the results was assessed using the confidence in network meta-analysis tool.

RESULTS

A total of 18 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with core decompression (CD), the forest plot showed that autologous bone grafting (ABG), free fibula grafting (FFG), vascularized bone grafting (VBG), autologous bone grafting combined with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ABG + BMAC), and biomaterial grafting combined with vascularized bone grafting (BMG + VBG) delayed ONFH progression. Among them, ABG + BMAC showed the most promising results (OR 0.019; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0012-0.25). However, upon comparing CD with different surgical modalities, no significant differences were found in preventing total hip arthroplasty. Furthermore, we cannot draw conclusions regarding the HHS due to attribution and high heterogeneity across the studies.

CONCLUSION

Overall, ABG, VBG, FFG, ABG + BMAC, and BMG + VBG showed significant results in preventing ONFH progression compared with that shown by CD. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking, ABG + BMAC was the most effective. Moreover, all treatments involving bone grafting were found to be effective, possibly indicating the necessity of its use in the treatment of ONFH.

Comparison of current treatment strategy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head from the perspective of cell therapy

Aims: The purpose of our study is to compare the effects of core decompression (CD) and bone grafting (BG) on osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). And evaluate the efficacy of CD based on cell therapy to provide guidance for the dose and number of cells. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library between 2012 and 2022, with keywords including "osteonecrosis of the femoral head", "core decompression" and "bone grafting". We selected comparative studies of CD and BG, and the comparison of CD combined with bone marrow (BM) transplantation and CD alone. Changes in hip pain were assessed by VAS, hip function were assessed by HHS and WOMAC, and THA conversion rate was used as an evaluation tool for femoral head collapse. From these three aspects, the dose of bone marrow and the number of cells transplantation were subgroup analyzed. Results: Eleven studies were used to compare the efficacy of CD and BG. There was no significant difference in HHS, and the THA conversion rate of BG was significantly lower than that of CD. Thirteen CD studies based on cell therapy were included in the meta-analysis. Bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) can significantly improve VAS (mean difference (MD), 10.15; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 7.35 to 12.96, p < 0.00001) and reduce THA conversion rate (odds ratio (OR), 2.38; 95% CI 1.26 to 4.47, p = 0.007). Medium dose bone marrow fluid has a lower p-value in THA conversion rate. The p values of bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMMC) of 10⁹ magnitude in VAS score were lower. Conclusion: In general, there is no consensus on the use of BG in the treatment of ONFH. The enhancement of cell-based CD procedure shows promising results. Using 20 mL BMAC and 10⁹ magnitude BMMC is likely to achieve better results.

Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty after Failure of Tantalum Rod Insertion in Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical outcomes and efficacy of hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head after the failure of porous tantalum rod insertion without rod removal.

Materials and Methods

Conversion to hip resurfacing arthroplasty was performed in 10 patients (11 hips) with a mean period of 14.9 months after the primary surgery. The mean follow-up period was 73.7 months. Analysis of pre and postoperative range of motion (ROM), University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, modified Harris hip score, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score was performed. Radiographic analysis of component loosening and osteolysis was performed.

Results

The postoperative ROM showed significant improvement (P<0.05), excluding flexion contracture. The modified Harris hip score showed improvement from 65.82 to 96.18, the UCLA score showed improvement from 4.18 to 8.00, and the VAS pain score was reduced from 6.09 to 1.80. All scores showed statistically significant improvement (P<0.05). No component loosening or osteolysis was detected by radiographic analysis.

Conclusion

Satisfactory results were obtained from conversion hip resurfacing arthroplasty after failure of porous tantalum rod insertion without rod removal. The findings of this study demonstrate the advantages of HRA, including no risk of trochanteric fracture and no bone loss around the tantalum rod. In addition, the remaining porous tantalum rod provided mechanical support, which reduced the potential risk of femoral neck fracture or loosening. This technique can be regarded as a favorable treatment option.

Impaction Bone Grafting Augmented With a Wire Coil by the Lightbulb Technique for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a debilitating disease that primarily affects the hips of young adults. The purpose of this study is to report the mid-term results of impaction bone grafting augmented with a wire coil using the lightbulb technique for ONFH.

METHODS

From 1998 to 2016, 50 hips with late precollapsed or early postcollapsed ONFH (28 hips with Association Research Circulation Osseous [ARCO] IIC and 22 with IIIA) were treated by impaction bone grafting augmented with a wire coil using the lightbulb technique. The survival rate was analyzed with conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the end point.

RESULTS

Thirty-one of the 50 hips had a successful clinical result without conversion to THA at a mean follow-up of 109.2 months. The 5-year survival rate was 68%, 82.1%, and 50% for the entire cohort, ARCO stage IIC, and ARCO stage IIIA, respectively. The 19 hips that had failed were converted to THA at an average of 52.8 months. The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model showed that an ARCO stage IIIA disease, a lateral lesion, and a necrotic index ≥0.67 were the independent risk factors for conversion to THA.

CONCLUSION

As a head-preserving procedure, the lightbulb technique using impaction bone grafting augmented with a wire coil is worthwhile for patients in an earlier stage of disease and smaller lesion size to postpone the need for THA.

Influence of less invasive hip preservation surgery on subsequent hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) following less invasive hip-preserving procedures (LIHPs) and present a critical overview of the literature to aid in better result interpretation. The search time was from the establishment of the database to September 2021, and the outcome indicators were extracted and analyzed by Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager software (RevMan version 5.4). Finally, 10 articles were included in this meta-analysis by searching Chinese databases and English databases. Three of them were published in Chinese, and the remaining studies were published in English. LIHP was further divided into the tantalum rod implantation group and the non-tantalum rod implantation group. The results showed that prior tantalum rod implantation increased the difficulty of conversion to THA, which was reflected mainly in the longer operative time [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 24.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 14.09–34.91, P < 0.00001] and greater intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 114.74, 95% CI = 33.52–195.96, P = 0.006), while no significant difference was found between the non-tantalum rod implantation group and the control group. Simultaneously, easier intraoperative fracture [odds ratio (OR) = 5.88, 95% CI = 0.93–37.05, P = 0.06] and stem malalignment (OR = 4.17, 95% CI = 1.18–14.71, P = 0.03) in the LIHP group tended to be observed than in the control THA group. However, there was no significant difference in cup anteversion and inclination angle, ectopic ossification, postoperative Harris Hip Score and survivorship between the LIHP group and the control group. Although LIHP increased the difficulty of the conversion to THA, it does not detrimentally affect the clinical results of subsequent THA in the mid-term follow-up.

Mesenchymal stem cell-seeded porous tantalum-based biomaterial: A promising choice for promoting bone regeneration

Porous tantalum-based biomaterial is a novel tissue engineering material widely used in repairing bone defects due to its corrosion resistance, low elastic modulus, high friction coefficient, and excellent biocompatibility. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs), a type of pluripotent stem cell, can travel from their original ecological niche to bone injury sites, where they differentiate into osteoblasts and osteocytes. Multiple factors regulate the proliferation, migration, and differentiation of BMSCs. In recent years, the regulatory effects of porous tantalum on BMSCs have been widely studied. Hence, in this study, we reviewed the characteristics of porous tantalum-based biomaterials and the mechanism of action of their regulatory effects on BMSCs. Further, we discuss the feasibility of seeding BMSCs in porous tantalum-based biomaterials for use in tissue repair.

Lack of Conclusive Evidence of the Benefit of Biologic Augmentation in Core Decompression for Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To assess whether biologic augmentation in addition to core decompression (CD), compared with CD alone, improves clinical and radiographic outcomes in the treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Our hypothesis was that biologic augmentation would reduce the progression of osteonecrosis and therefore also the rate of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. Six databases were searched: Central, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, AMED, and Web of Science. Studies comparing outcomes of CD versus CD plus biologic augmentation (with or without structural augmentation), with a reported minimum level of evidence of III and ≥24 months of follow-up, were eligible. Procedural success was conceptualized as (1) avoidance of conversion to THA and (2) absence of radiographic disease progression. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists. A quantitative analysis of heterogeneity was undertaken.

RESULTS

We included studies reporting on 560 hips in 484 patients. Biologic augmentation consisted of bone marrow stem cells in 10 studies, bone morphogenic protein in 2, and platelet-rich plasma in 1. Three studies used additional structural augmentation. The median maximum follow-up time was 45 months. Only 4 studies reported improvement in all clinical scores in the augmentation group. Seven studies observed a reduction in the rate of radiographic progression, and only 5 found reduced rates of conversion to THA when using augmentation. A high risk of bias and marked heterogeneity was found, with uncertainty about the study designs implemented, analytical approaches, and quality of reporting.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence is inconclusive regarding the benefit of biologic augmentation in CD for nontraumatic ONFH, because of inconsistent results with substantial heterogeneity and high risk of bias.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, systematic review of level I, II, and III studies.

Porous tantalum implant for treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a minimum 5-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the survival rate of porous tantalum rod implantation in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), evaluate its clinical effect and imaging results.

METHODS

From January 2008 to December 2013, porous tantalum rod implantation for ONFH was performed in two institutions. Statistical analysis of operation data, including operation time, blood loss and blood transfusion were recorded.

RESULTS

52 hips received complete follow-up, the average follow-up time was 85.7 months (60-132 months). 24 hips turned to THA at the end of follow-up (46.2%), the average time was 44.3 ± 32.8 months, and the average Harris hip score before THA was 57.1 ± 7.6. Cox proportional-hazards model revealed that Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage (P = 0.017), bone marrow edema (P = 0.006) and age > 40 years (P = 0.043) were independent risk factors for conversion to THA.

CONCLUSION

ARCO stage, age and bone marrow edema were risk factors for the failure of porous tantalum rod implantation to convert to THA.

Efficacy of tantalum rod insertion for preventing femoral head collapse in osteonecrosis in a paediatric population: a pilot study

Femoral head osteonecrosis in the paediatric population is difficult to treat, with the primary goals of management being prevention of subchondral collapse and the avoidance of early total hip replacement. This study aims to describe the use of a porous tantalum rod implant to provide mechanical support in preventing femoral head collapse in a paediatric population. A retrospective chart-based analysis of patients with osteonecrosis of the hip was performed at our institution to identify those who had undergone tantalum rod insertion. A total of 10 patients (fives males and five females, median age 12.5 years, 9–18) had tantalum rods implanted between December 2013 and February 2018. One patient was excluded due to follow-up at a different institution. The radiographic degree of osteonecrosis was characterized according to the Ficat classification and the Kerboul angle. Radiographic assessment of pre- and post-operative plain films was performed. The outcome measures were Tonnis grade and percentage collapse of the femoral head. Nine patients with a mean follow-up time of 18.4 months were included in the analysis. There was no significant increase in the femoral head collapse percentage post tantalum rod insertion compared to pre-operatively (P = 0.63). There was a significant increase in the Tonnis grade post-operatively (P < 0.05), with sub-group analysis showing minimal increase in Ficat Stage 1 patients. This study is the first to examine the role of tantalum rod insertion in preventing femoral head collapse in a paediatric population, with results suggesting potential benefit in a subset of patients.

Porous tantalum rod implantation is associated with low survival rates in patients with type C2 osteonecrosis of the femoral head but has no effect on the clinical outcome of conversion total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study with an average 8-year follow-up

Background

Our study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and survival rates following porous tantalum rod surgery (PTRS) and conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) subsequent to failed PTRS.

Methods

A total of 38 subjects (40 hips) with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) were included in this retrospective study between January 2008 and December 2011. All subjects were evaluated before surgery by using the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification system, the Japan Investigation Committee (JIC) classification and the Harris hip score (HHS). The endpoint of this study was set as final follow-up (including the survival time of PTRS and conversion THA). The rates of radiological progression were also evaluated. Patients who received conversion THA were further followed and compared to a control group of 58 patients with ONFH who underwent primary THA.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 120.7 ± 9.2 (range, 104–143) months, and the overall survival rate was 75% at 96 months (ARCO stage II: 81.5%; stage III: 38.5%; JIC type C1: 83.3%; C2: 30%). The HHS before surgery was 59 (55–61), in contrast to 94 (91–96) at 96 months follow-up (P < 0.01). HHS in stage III show a significant poorer result compared to stage II at 24 months. HHS in Type C2 group show no significant difference compared to HHS before surgery at 24 and 60 months follow up (P = 0.91, P = 0.30). Twelve hips requiring secondary THA were followed for 66.9 ± 31.7 months, and control hips that underwent primary THA was followed for 75.4 ± 14.9 months. The HHS in the conversion group was 89 (86–93) and that in the primary THA group was 92 (79–95, P = 0.09) at the 5-year follow-up.

Conclusion

In the mid-term follow-up, porous tantalum implants showed an encouraging survival rate in symptomatic patients in early stages (ARCO stage II) or with limited necrotic lesions (JIC type C1). In addition, our results did not demonstrated any difference between primary THA and conversion THA.

Does prior core decompression have detrimental effect on subsequent total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Core decompression (CD) is effective in relieving pain and delaying the progression to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the influence of CD on subsequent THA has not yet been established. Therefore, we performed this systematic review to answer: does prior CD have detrimental effect on subsequent THA for ONFH, especially with regards to survivorship and functional results, as well as perioperative and postoperative complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After registration on PROSPERO (CRD42019118861), literature published up to and including November 2018 was searched in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases with predetermined terms. Comparative studies on the clinical outcomes between conversion to THA with prior CD (the Prior CD group) and primary THA (the Control group) for ONFH were included. The outcomes of interest included survivorship free from revision, the postoperative functional performance, perioperative and postoperative complications. Data was extracted systematically and a meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 retrospective cohort studies with 110 hips were identified for the Prior CD group and 237 hips were identified for inclusion in the Control group. All of the studies were of high quality in terms of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. No difference in the rate of revision between the two groups (2/42 (4.8%) vs. 4/160 (2.5%); RR=1.92; 95% CI=0.34 to 10.75; p=0.46) was detected after a minimum two-year follow-up. The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was similar between the two groups in all 5 studies. The two groups experienced similar blood loss (Mean difference=12.17ml; 95% CI= -15.28 to 39.61ml; p=0.38). Moreover, intraoperative fracture was increased in the Prior CD group, though this did not reach statistical significance (3/31 (9.7%) vs. 0/55 (0.0%); RR=7.05; 95% CI=0.82 to 60.78; p=0.08). Similarly, osteolysis or radiolucent lines were more likely to occur in the Prior CD group without statistical significance (9/81 (11.1%) vs. 6/200 (3.0%); RR=3.14, 95% CI=0.98 to 10.06; p=0.05).

DISCUSSION

The present evidence indicated that prior CD does not detrimentally affect the survivorship nor hip scores of subsequent THA. Attention should be paid, however, to the potential for intraoperative fracture, postoperative osteolysis or radiolucent lines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; systematic review and meta-analysis of level III retrospective comparative studies.

Outcomes of conversion THA after failed porous tantalum implant for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a comparative matched study

BACKGROUND

As a joint-preserving surgery, porous tantalum implantation (PTI) provides an additional treatment option for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, conversion to a total hip arthroplasty (THA) after failed PTI is considered a challenging procedure. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes and complications of THA after failed PTI with those of primary THA without any previous surgery for ONFH.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 32 patients undergoing THA after failed PTI and 25 age, sex, and body mass index matched patients who underwent primary THA without any previous surgery for ONFH between December 2009 and March 2014. All patients were followed for at least 36 months. The postoperative clinical and radiological evaluations were based on Harris Hip Score (HHS) and plain radiographs. The independent sample test and the chi-square test were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The HHS in the PTI group was similar to that in the primary group at the latest follow-up (p = 0.274), but longer operation time and greater intraoperative blood loss were observed in the PTI group (p < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences in radiological parameters and postoperative complications were found between the 2 groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

THA after PTI showed similar clinical and radiological outcomes to primary THA except for longer operation time and greater intraoperative blood loss.

Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Where Do We Stand Today?: A 5-Year Update

➢. Clinicians should exercise a high level of suspicion in at-risk patients (those who use corticosteroids, consume excessive alcohol, have sickle cell disease, etc.) in order to diagnose osteonecrosis of the femoral head in its earliest stage. ➢. Nonoperative treatment modalities have generally been ineffective at halting progression. Thus, nonoperative treatment is not appropriate in early stages when one is attempting to preserve the native joint, except potentially on rare occasions for small-sized, medially located lesions, which may heal without surgery. ➢. Joint-preserving procedures should be attempted in early-stage lesions to save the femoral head. ➢. Cell-based augmentation of joint-preserving procedures continues to show promising results, and thus should be considered as an ancillary treatment method that may improve clinical outcomes. ➢. The outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in the setting of osteonecrosis are excellent, with results similar to those in patients who have an underlying diagnosis of osteoarthritis.

The Comparative Analysis of Antegrade Versus Retrograde Approach for a Failed Porous Tantalum Rod Removal During Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

The failure of porous tantalum rods applied to patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) has been increasingly reported during the last few years. Very few studies have reported methods for implant removal. This study aimed at comparing 2 procedures used for the removal of a failed tantalum rod during conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Material/Methods

A total of 65 patients (65 hips), who underwent THA after failed implantation of a tantalum rod between June 2007 and December 2016, were retrospectively evaluated. These patients were classified into 2 groups depending on whether the antegrade approach (removal of the tantalum rod from the tip to the butt at the lateral femoral cortex, n=27) or retrograde approach (removal of the tantalum rod from the butt at the lateral femoral cortex to the proximal tip, n=38) was used for rod extraction. These 2 groups were compared for incision length, operation time, blood loss, fracture, tantalum debris, Harris hip scores, and the presence of osteolysis and/or radiolucency.

Results

These 2 groups did not present any significant differences in terms of Harris hip score and incision length. However, the operation time (P=0.000), blood loss (P=0.000), amount of tantalum debris (P=0.000), and presence of radiolucency (P=0.046) were greater for the retrograde approach than for the antegrade approach.

Conclusions

The risk of conversion to THA following failed tantalum rod implantation is high. In such cases, the antegrade procedure was found to be a simple and efficient method for removing the trabecular metal rod with the use of a trephine.

Comparison of core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation with conservative treatment for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: A minimum 18 month follow-up study

Porous tantalum rod implantation is a novel surgical method that is used to treat avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head (hip). In the present study, the results of core decompression and tantalum rod implantation were compared with non-surgical treatment for AVN, and the survivorship of the femoral head was evaluated. In total, 60 patients with AVN femoral head were recruited and analysed. Non-surgical treatment was selected by 30 patients (41 hips), 7 with a Ficat score of I and 23 with a score of II. Non-surgical treatment included celecoxib, salvia miltiorrhiza and tetramethylypyrazine and a reduction in weight-bearing activities. Surgical treatment and porous tantalum rod implantation were selected by 30 patients (41 hips), 10 with a Ficat score of I and 20 with a score of II. After follow-up (average: 33.5 months), patients were evaluated by assessing post-operative complications, radiology, hip survivorship and Harris hip score. In the surgical group, pre-operative symptoms were significantly alleviated. No complications, including infection, delayed healing or fractures were reported. Final follow-up rates of femoral head survivorship were 4.9% in the non-surgical group and 36.7% in the surgical group. The Harris hip score was significantly improved following surgery when compared with non-surgical treatment (P<0.05). The results indicated that core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation are beneficial short- and mid-term treatment methods for AVN of the femoral head.

Comparison of Total Hip Arthroplasty after Two Types of Failed Hip Preserving Procedures with Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Objective

Porous tantalum implantation (PTI) and bone impaction grafting (BIG) through a window at the femoral head neck junction are known as two types of joint‐preserving procedures. They provide an alternative option in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head by providing strong structural support to the subchondral plate. However, when earlier joint‐preserving treatments fail, conversion to a total hip arthroplasty seems to be the final treatment of choice. This emphasizes the importance of joint‐preserving procedures that do not hinder the clinical results of a subsequent total hip arthroplasty. The results of conversion total hip arthroplasty after failed PTI and BIG are still controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after failed PTI or BIG surgery with primary total hip arthroplasty.

Methods

Patients at our institution between 2010 and 2014 who underwent total hip arthroplasty after failed PTI or BIG surgery compared to primary total hip arthroplasty were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 27 patients (30 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty after failed PTI surgery (group I) were matched according to age, gender and BMI index with 28 patients (30 hips) who underwent total hip arthroplasty after failed BIG surgery (group II) and 30 patients (30 hips) who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (group III). The clinical results included preoperative and postoperative Harris Hip score, surgery duration, blood loss volume and clinical complications. Radiological follow‐up results included abduction angle and anteversion angle of the acetabular cup, periprosthetic osteolysis, and prosthesis subsidence.

Results

There was no significant difference in the preoperative and postoperative Harris Hip score among the three groups at the latest follow‐up (P = 0.247). The surgery duration was longer and intra‐operative blood loss volume was higher in group I than in group II and group III (P < 0.05, respectively). There was no difference in surgery duration and blood loss volume between group II and group III (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in radiological follow‐up results among the three groups (P > 0.05). Varying degrees of residual tantalum debris were seen on postoperative radiographs of all group I patients. There was no difference in the incidence of complications among the three groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

PTI group had higher blood loss volume and surgery duration than BIG group and primary total hip arthroplasty group. BIG group had no significant differences with primary total hip arthroplasty group in clinical and radiological follow‐up results. There were no significant differences between the three groups in the Harris Hip score and radiological follow‐up results.

Tantalum-incorporated hydroxyapatite coating on titanium implants: its mechanical and in vitro osteogenic properties

OBJECTIVE

The fabrication of bioactive coatings on metallic implants to enhance osseointegration has become a topic of general interest in orthopedics and dentistry. Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating has been shown to induce bone formation and promote bone-implant integration. Unfortunately, poor mechanical performance has hindered this from becoming a favorable coating material. The majority of present studies have focused in incorporating different elements into HA coatings to improve mechanical properties. In recent years, tantalum (Ta) has received increasing attention due to its excellent biocompatibility and corrosion resistance. The aim of on the present study was to investigate the fabrication and biological performance of Ta-incorporated HA coatings.

METHODS

Ta-incorporated HA coatings were fabricated using the plasma spray technique on a titanium substrate, and the surface characteristics and mechanical properties were examined. In addition, the effects of Ta-incorporated HA coatings on the biological behavior of mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were investigated.

RESULTS

Ta-incorporated HA coatings with microporous structure had higher roughness and wettability. In addition, the bonding strength of Ta/HA coatings with the substrate was substantially superior to HA coatings. Furthermore, Ta-incorporated HA coatings not only facilitated initial cell adhesion and faster proliferation, but also promoted the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that the incorporation of Ta could improve mechanical performance and increase the osteogenic activity of HA coatings. The Ta-incorporated HA coating fabricated by plasma spraying is expected to be a promising bio-coating material for metallic implants.

Outcome after a new porous tantalum rod implantation for treatment of early-stage femoral head osteonecrosis

Background

Tantalum rods have been used in osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) for several years, while Zimmer trabecular metal implants have been proposed as the best choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a new porous tantalum rod on the treatment of early ONFH.

Methods

From July 2014 to December 2015, 19 patients (21 hips) were treated with Runze tantalum rod, and 20 patients (20 hips) received Zimmer tantalum prosthesis. All patients were followed up for at least 3 years.

Results

There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) improvement between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show any statistically significant difference in survival rates. One case in the Runze group had persistent pain and required conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) 8 months post-surgery. Histological evaluations revealed the presence of abundant new bone ingrowth into pores of the tantalum. The osteonecrosis observed in other patients was almost unchanged. At final follow-up, progressive collapse of the femoral head or the apparent joint space narrowing had not occurred.

Conclusions

Compared with the traditional implants, implantation of the Chinese tantalum rod in the treatment of Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stages I, and II ONFH demonstrated highly encouraging clinical results.

Total hip arthroplasty following failure of tantalum rod implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with 5- to 10-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with failure of tantalum rod implant for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) will be the only choice for patients. However,it remains unknown whether tantalum rod implantation has an adverse effect on the survival time of implants following conversion to THA. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of conversion to THA in patients who were previously treated with implantation of a tantalum rod.

METHODS

This study included 31 patients (39 hips), who underwent conversion to THA due to failure of core decompression with an implanted tantalum rod. Among these 31 patients, 26 patients were male and five patients were female. The mean age of these patients was 49.3 years old (range: 36-64 years old). The control group included 33 patients (40 hips), who underwent total hip replacement without tantalum rod implantation. The hip Harris score, implant wear, osteolysis, radiolucencies and surgical complications were recorded during the follow-up. The distribution of tantalum debris in the proximal, middle and distal periprosthetic femoral regions, radiolucent lines and osteolysis were analyzed on post-operative radiographs.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in Harris score, liner wear and complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Osteolysis and radiolucent lines more likely occurred in patients with tantalum debris distributed in three regions than in one or two regions (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The mid-term clinical outcome of patients who underwent THA with tantalum rod implantation was not different from those without a tantalum rod, suggesting that tantalum debris did not increase the liner wear rate. However, the distribution of periprosthetic tantalum debris in the proximal, middle and distal femoral regions may increase the risk of femoral osteolysis and radiolucent lines.

What is the rate of patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty after core decompression and insertion of a tantalum rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Core decompression (CD) may be effective when performed during the early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Tantalum may be added as a rod that would allow putting some mechanical constraints on the femoral head. We aimed to estimate the rate of total hip arthroplasty after CD and insertion of a tantalum rod during early stages of OFNH.

METHODS

We searched systematically Medline via PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Our primary endpoint was the rate of patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty after CD and insertion of a tantalum rod. Secondary endpoints were the delay between the initial surgery and the arthroplasty, the functional improvement, and the rate of complications.

RESULTS

We included seven  studies reporting the results of 232 patients (297 hips) that were operated on by CD and insertion of a tantalum rod. At a mean follow-up of 26.97 months, 24.63% of the included hips underwent a hip arthroplasty (6-56%, SD = 17.34%). The mean delay between the initial surgery and the arthroplasty was 14.94 months (10.20-22.90; SD = 5.25), the mean improvement of Harris Hip Score was 27.66 (20.20-36.90; SD = 6.48), and the mean rate of femoral fracture was 2.43% (0-13%, SD = 4.89%).

CONCLUSION

CD and insertion of a tantalum rod may represent a solution in order to improve the mechanical support and to give a rate of conversion in arthroplasty that is acceptable.