Comparison of arthroscopic and open reduction of conservatively irreducible dislocated hips of children

Arthroscopic debridement and reduction is an effective procedure for failed closed reduction in young children with developmental dislocation of the hip

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of arthroscopic debridement and reduction through two medial portals for the treatment of developmental dislocation of the hip (DDH) with failure of initial closed reduction and to explore key pathological structures obstructing reduction.

METHODS

Forty-eight children with 58 irreducible dislocated hips treated by arthroscopic reduction between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Arthroscopic reduction was performed via two medial portals located in the superior and inferior adductor longus. All intra-articular obstacles were eliminated via arthroscopy, followed by manual reduction and spica cast immobilization. The surgical duration, extent of improvement in the safe zone, and extent of secondary surgical treatment were noted. All the children were followed up for > 24 months. Hip function and radiographic outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

All 58 hips showed safe zone improvement and concentric reduction after arthroscopic debridement. Hypertrophic ligamentum teres and thickened pulvinars were detected and resected in all hips. Constrictive capsules preventing reduction were observed in 15 hips, which needed to be further released. No inverted labrum was observed. Secondary surgery was performed in four hips with redislocation and seven hips with subluxation during follow-up. The remaining 47 hips (81.03%) maintained their reduction at the last follow-up. Excellent and good clinical outcomes were achieved in 95.74% of patients according to McKay's criteria. Two hips, three hips, and one hip were diagnosed with grade I, II, and III osteonecrosis of the femoral head, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that arthroscopic debridement and reduction is a safe and feasible choice for treating irreducible DDH.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Controversies in Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Many aspects of developmental hip dysplasia (DDH) care and evaluation are still active areas of debate. Recent studies have provided more insight into these topics such as strategies for reducing osteonecrosis, assessing hip reduction after closed and open reduction, and the management of residual acetabular dysplasia.

RECENT FINDINGS

The presence of the ossific nucleus at the time of reduction does not alter the risk of osteonecrosis. The risk of osteonecrosis may be higher when hips are immobilized in excessive abduction. Limited sequence MRI may be the best choice for assessing hip reduction after closed and open reduction; however, new technologies are emerging such as 3D fluoroscopy and perfusion MRI. The treatment of residual acetabular dysplasia with bracing has been shown to be effective and the decision to perform a pelvic osteotomy is based on patient-specific factors. The spectrum of DDH treatment has evolved over the past several decades. Recent studies have provided insights into strategies for osteonecrosis prevention, hip evaluation during after reduction, and the management of residual acetabular dysplasia. However, there is ample room for additional and more rigorous studies guiding advanced imaging for assessing hip reduction such as 3D fluoroscopy and perfusion MRI, as well as the management of residual acetabular dysplasia.

Anterior approach with mini-bikini incision in open reduction in infants with developmental dysplasia of the hip

Purpose

The anterior and medial approaches in open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) had been widely used. The former could not directly approach the intra-articular interposition, while the latter had been associated with injury to blood vessel and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head. Meanwhile, the bikini incision had also been mentioned in some studies. The purpose of this study was to introduce a modified anterior approach through a mini-bikini incision and report its short-term outcomes.

Methods

Data of DDH patients younger than 2 years at the time of surgery who had received this mini-bikini incision between June 2013 and December 2018 were collected. The surgical technique, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, and length of incision were recorded in detail. In the latest follow up, the objective measurement of the scar and the subjective feeling towards the scar were collected. X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at the last follow-up, and the incidence of residual dysplasia, redislocation, and femoral head AVN was analyzed.

Results

Forty-three cases (49 hips) were included with an averaged follow-up of 43 months. The operation duration was 22 min, and the blood loss was 9.8 ml on average. The length of the scar averaged 2.6 cm. The mean University of North Carolina “4P” scar scale (UNC4P) for the scar was 0.92, and no patients complained numbness. Overall, all the parents were satisfied with the cosmetic appearance. The mean acetabular index (AI) was 27.42° ± 6.41° in dislocated hip in the last follow-up. One hip redislocated soon after the operation and was reduced in a closed manner right away. MRI showed improved coverage but still some residual dysplasia that was in accordance with the post-operative recovery nature. Four hips (8%) had signs of AVN in X-ray.

Conclusion

Open reduction through the anterior approach with the mini-bikini incision was a safe procedure with comparable outcomes to classical approaches. It would be a complementary approach for DDH patients younger than 2 years old who need an open reduction.