Standing and walking age in children with idiopathic clubfoot: French physiotherapy versus Ponseti method

What is New in Pediatric Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle

BACKGROUND

This paper aims to report on the last 5 years of relevant research on pediatric foot and ankle pathology with specific focus on clubfoot, congenital vertical talus, toe walking, tarsal coalitions, pes planovalgus with or without accessory navicular, foot and ankle trauma, and talar dome osteochondritis dessicans.

METHODS

The Browzine platform was used to review the table of contents for all papers published in the following target journals related to the treatment of pediatric foot and ankle conditions. Search results were further refined to include clinical trials and randomized controlled trials published from March 1, 2015 to November 15, 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 73 papers were selected for review based on new findings and significant contributions in treatment of clubfoot, congenital vertical talus, toe walking, tarsal coalitions, pes planovalgus with or without accessory navicular, foot and ankle trauma, and talar dome osteochondritis dessicans. Also included were several papers that did not fit into any of these categories but provided new insight into specific foot and ankle pathologies.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment strategies for children with foot and ankle pathology are continually evolving. We review many of the most recent publications with the goal of improving understanding of these pathologies and highlighting current best practices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Idiopathic clubfoot treatment and heterogeneity of current therapeutic strategies: The Ponseti method versus the French functional method (a systematic review)

BACKGROUND

Since Hippocrates, the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot has undergone many changes, with surgical techniques and conservative approaches evolving over the centuries. Today, a wide variety of practices exist in France and throughout the world; consequently, the treatment of idiopathic clubfoot remains controversial, but the Ponseti method and the functional method seem to stand out. Nevertheless, has one of them demonstrated superiority?

METHODS

The purpose of this review is to compare these two methods. Based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 recommendations, this research was conducted on Pubmed, Web of Science, and 1Findr. Only articles concerning patients with moderate or severe idiopathic clubfoot (10-17 on the Dimeglio scale) treated early using the Ponseti method or the functional method were eligible.

RESULTS

After reviewing 49 studies, seven published between 2008 and 2018 were selected: five prospective cohort studies, one retrospective cohort study, and one meta-analysis. Each method, according to morphological and kinetic criteria, seems to have advantages that the other does not have.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the Ponseti method is becoming the gold standard and appears more appropriate in poor countries, it is impossible to affirm its superiority over the functional method. Therefore, the combination of their advantages deserves attention: a hybrid method could be an appealing prospect for the future.