The efficacy of rotational control designs in promoting torsional stability of hip fracture fixation

Experimental and numerical analysis of the influence of intramedullary nail position on the cut-out phenomenon

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Proximal femur fractures, colloquially known as hip fractures, are a common pathology with increasing incidence in the last years due to the enhanced ageing population. Regarding the extracapsular fracture, the treatment for this pathology consists of a fixation of the fragments using an osteosynthesis device, mainly the intramedullary nail. This repairing method implies several complications, which may include the failure of the fixation device, frequently occurring due to the "cut-out" mechanism. The present work focuses on the study of how the position of the cephalic screw, which should be fixed during surgery, affects the cut-out risk. Through experimental tests and numerical models some variables that can be critical for the cut-out phenomenon are analysed.

METHODS

This study has been carried out through a numerical model based on the finite element method and experimental tests. The digital image correlation technique has been used in experimental tests to measure displacements on the femoral surface with the objective of numerical model validation. Some basic daily activities with different intramedullary nail positions have been analysed through the numerical model, considering variables that can induce the cut-out complication.

RESULTS

The results show how the intramedullary nail position clearly influences the cut-out risk, showing that displacements in the upper, anterior and posterior direction increase the cut-out risk, while displacement in the lower direction endangers the intramedullary nail itself. Thus, the centred position is the one which reduces the cut-out risk.

CONCLUSIONS

This work supposes an improvement in the knowledge of the cut-out phenomenon thanks to the combination of experimental testing and validated numerical models. The effects of different intramedullary nail positions in the femoral head are studied, including a novelty variable as torque, which is critical for the structural integrity of the fixation. The main conclusion of the work is the determination of the central intramedullary nail position as the most favourable one for decreasing the cut-out risk.

Novel slide compression anatomic plates of the femoral neck for treating unstable femoral neck fracture: A biomechanical study

To compare the biomechanical stability of slide compression anatomic plates of the femoral neck, cannulated compression screws and dynamic hip screws with derotation screws for stabilizing unstable femoral neck fractures (Pauwels angle = 70°). Pauwels III femoral neck fractures were created on 45 Sawbones femurs and randomly assigned to three implant groups (1:1:1). The biomechanical stability of all Sawbones in each treatment group was evaluated with three tests. First, in the static loading test, the load-displacement curve, vertical stiffness (load/vertical displacement [N/mm]) and 5 mm failure load were recorded. Second, in the incremental cyclic loading test (700, 1000, and 1400 N), the cyclic-displacement curve and the displacement of the fragments were recorded. Third, in the torsion test, the torsional rigidity, maximum torque, and torsional angle corresponding to the maximum torque were recorded. The static compression test showed that slide compression anatomic place-femoral neck (SCAP-FN) had the largest vertical stiffness (275 ± 11 N/mm, p < 0.01) and 5 mm failure load (1232 ± 156, p < 0.01). The cyclic loading test showed that SCAP-FN had the lowest change in displacement after 30000 cycles of loading. The torsional stiffness and the maximum torque followed the order SCAP-FN > dynamic hip screw systems (DHS) + derotational screw (DS) > CCS, and the torsional angle corresponding to the maximum torque followed the order SCAP-FN < DHS + DS < CCS. The SCAP-FN construct provides stiffness and stability compared with other standard fixation techniques (3CS and DHS + DS). The fixation strategy of SCAP-FN might be sufficient for clinical use, indicating studies in the human body are warranted.

Beyond the pedicle screw-a patent review

PURPOSE

This review provides an overview of the patent literature on posteriorly placed intrapedicular bone anchors. Conventional pedicle screws are the gold standard to create a fixation in the vertebra for spinal fusion surgery but may lack fixation strength, especially in osteoporotic bone. The ageing population demands new bone anchors that have an increased fixation strength, that can be placed safely, and, if necessary, can be removed without damaging the surrounding tissue.

METHODS

The patent search was conducted using a classification search in the Espacenet patent database. Only patents with a Cooperative Patent Classification of A61B17/70 or A61B17/7001 concerning spinal positioners and stabilizers were eligible for inclusion. The search query resulted in the identification of 731 patents. Based on preset inclusion criteria, a total of 56 unique patents on different anchoring methods were included, reviewed and categorized in this study.

RESULTS

Five unique fixation methods were identified; (1) anchors that use threading, (2) anchors that utilize a curved path through the vertebra, (3) anchors that (partly) expand, (4) anchors that use cement and (5) anchors that are designed to initiate bone ingrowth. Of the anchor designs included in this study, eight had a corresponding commercial product, six of which were evaluated in clinical trials.

CONCLUSION

This review provides insights into worldwide patented intrapedicular bone anchors that aim to increase the fixation strength compared to the conventional pedicle screw. The identified anchoring methods and their working principles can be used for clinical decision-making and as a source of inspiration when designing novel bone anchors.

Biomechanical comparison of lag screw and non-spiral blade fixation of a novel femoral trochanteric nail in an osteoporotic bone model

There is no consensus regarding the advantages of the lag screw type over the blade type for treating femoral trochanteric fractures. We aimed to investigate whether non-spiral blade (Conventional-Blade, Fid-Blade) nails provide better biomechanical fixation than lag screws in a severe osteoporotic bone model. Different severities of osteoporotic cancellous bone were modelled using polyurethane foam blocks of three densities (0.24, 0.16, and 0.08 g/cm³). Three torsional tests were performed using each component for each density of the polyurethane block, and the maximum torque was recorded; subsequently, the energy required to achieve 30° rotation was calculated. Using a push-in test, the maximum force was recorded, and the energy required to achieve 4-mm displacement was calculated. For 0.08-g/cm³ density, the peak torques to achieve 30° rotation, energy required to achieve 30° rotation, peak force to achieve 4-mm displacement, and energy required to achieve 4-mm displacement were significantly greater for Conventional-Blade and Fid-Blade than those for Lag Screw. The fixation stability of the blade-type Magnum nail component is better than that of the lag screw type under any test condition. The blade-type nail component may have better fixation stability than the lag screw type in a severe osteoporotic bone model.

Intracapsular Femoral Neck Fractures-A Surgical Management Algorithm

Background and Objectives: Femoral neck fractures are common and constitute one of the largest healthcare burdens of the modern age. Fractures within the joint capsule (intracapsular) provide a specific surgical challenge due to the difficulty in predicting rates of bony union and whether the blood supply to the femoral head has been disrupted in a way that would lead to avascular necrosis. Most femoral neck fractures are treated surgically, aiming to maintain mobility, whilst reducing pain and complications associated with prolonged bedrest. Materials and Methods: We performed a narrative review of intracapsular hip fracture management, highlighting the latest advancements in fixation techniques, generating an evidence-based algorithm for their management. Results: Multiple different fracture configurations are encountered within the category of intracapsular hip fractures, with each pattern having different optimal surgical strategies. Additionally, these injuries typically occur in patients where further procedures due to operative complications are associated with a considerable increase in mortality, highlighting the need for choosing the correct index operation. Conclusions: Factors such as pathological causes for the fracture, pre-existing symptomatic osteoarthritis, patient’s physiological age and fracture displacement all need to be considered when choosing optimal management.

Influence of interlocking thread screws to repair simulated adult canine humeral condylar fractures

OBJECTIVE

To determine the influence of interlocking screw threads on the biomechanical properties of repaired canine humeral condylar fractures.

STUDY DESIGN

Ex vivo biomechanical study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Thirty-six humeral condyles.

METHODS

Simulated fractures of the lateral aspect of the humeral condyle were stabilized by a 3.5 mm interlocking thread screw (ITS) or 3.5 mm buttress thread screw placed in lag (BTS-L) or positional fashion (BTS-P) and axially loaded at a walk, trot, 2-mm displacement, and failure cycles. Compact flute drill bits (CFBs) were used for ITS constructs and standard flute drill bits (SFB) for BTS constructs. The effects of bit type on drilling parameters and screw type on screw insertion properties and fragment stability were assessed.

RESULTS

CFB produced a 6°C greater temperature increase (p = .042) and required 20 N higher torque (p = .003) than SFB. Insertional torque was greater for ITS than BTS-P (p = .001) and BTS-L (p = .001). Condylar fragment rotation at failure was lower in ITS (lsmean ± SE, 8.3° ± 1.9°) than BTS-L constructs (14.5° ± 2.3°, p = .011). ITS resisted greater loads (1503 ± 105 N) than BTS-P (1189 ± 99 N, p = .038) but not BTS-L (1249 ± 123 N, p = .121) constructs.

CONCLUSION

Biomechanical performance of constructs was improved with ITS rather than BTS fixation.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

ITS can be considered for stabilization of humeral condylar fractures in adult dogs.

Effect on health-related quality of life of the X-Bolt dynamic plating system versus the sliding hip screw for the fixation of trochanteric fractures of the hip in adults: the WHiTE Four randomized clinical trial

AIMS

Surgical treatment of hip fracture is challenging; the bone is porotic and fixation failure can be catastrophic. Novel implants are available which may yield superior clinical outcomes. This study compared the clinical effectiveness of the novel X-Bolt Hip System (XHS) with the sliding hip screw (SHS) for the treatment of fragility hip fractures.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentre, superiority, randomized controlled trial. Patients aged 60 years and older with a trochanteric hip fracture were recruited in ten acute UK NHS hospitals. Participants were randomly allocated to fixation of their fracture with XHS or SHS. A total of 1,128 participants were randomized with 564 participants allocated to each group. Participants and outcome assessors were blind to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the EuroQol five-dimension five-level health status (EQ-5D-5L) utility at four months. The minimum clinically important difference in utility was pre-specified at 0.075. Secondary outcomes were EQ-5D-5L utility at 12 months, mortality, residential status, mobility, revision surgery, and radiological measures.

RESULTS

Overall, 437 and 443 participants were analyzed in the primary intention-to-treat analysis in XHS and SHS treatment groups respectively. There was a mean difference of 0.029 in adjusted utility index in favour of XHS with no evidence of a difference between treatment groups (95% confidence interval -0.013 to 0.070; p = 0.175). There was no evidence of any differences between treatment groups in any of the secondary outcomes. The pattern and overall risk of adverse events associated with both treatments was similar.

CONCLUSION

Any difference in four-month health-related quality of life between the XHS and SHS is small and not clinically important. There was no evidence of a difference in the safety profile of the two treatments; both were associated with lower risks of revision surgery than previously reported. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(2):256-263.

Biomechanical comparison of medial sustainable nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation in the treatment of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture

AIMS

Restoration of proximal medial femoral support is the keystone in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. None of the available implants are effective in constructing the medial femoral support. Medial sustainable nail (MSN-II) is a novel cephalomedullary nail designed for this. In this study, biomechanical difference between MSN-II and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-II) was compared to determine whether or not MSN-II can effectively reconstruct the medial femoral support.

METHODS

A total of 36 synthetic femur models with simulated intertrochanteric fractures without medial support (AO/OTA 31-A2.3) were assigned to two groups with 18 specimens each for stabilization with MSN-II or PFNA-II. Each group was further divided into three subgroups of six specimens according to different experimental conditions respectively as follows: axial loading test; static torsional test; and cyclic loading test.

RESULTS

The mean axial stiffness, vertical displacement, and maximum failure load of MSN-II were 258.47 N/mm (SD 42.27), 2.99 mm (SD 0.56), and 4,886 N (SD 525.31), respectively, while those of PFNA-II were 170.28 N/mm (SD 64.63), 4.86 mm (SD 1.66), and 3,870.87 N (SD 552.21), respectively. The mean torsional stiffness and failure torque of MSN-II were 1.72 N m/° (SD 0.61) and 16.54 N m (SD 7.06), respectively, while those of PFNA-II were 0.61 N m/° (SD 0.39) and 6.6 N m (SD 6.65), respectively. The displacement of MSN-II in each cycle point was less than that of PFNA-II in cyclic loading test. Significantly higher stiffness and less displacement were detected in the MSN-II group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The biomechanical performance of MSN-II was better than that of PFNA-II, suggesting that MSN-II may provide more effective mechanical support in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(12):840-847.