The vicissitudes of gene therapy

Current State of Human Gene Therapy: Approved Products and Vectors

In the realm of gene therapy, a pivotal moment arrived with Paul Berg's groundbreaking identification of the first recombinant DNA in 1972. This achievement set the stage for future breakthroughs. Conditions once considered undefeatable, like melanoma, pancreatic cancer, and a host of other ailments, are now being addressed at their root cause-the genetic level. Presently, the gene therapy landscape stands adorned with 22 approved in vivo and ex vivo products, including IMLYGIC, LUXTURNA, Zolgensma, Spinraza, Patisiran, and many more. In this comprehensive exploration, we delve into a rich assortment of 16 drugs, from siRNA, miRNA, and CRISPR/Cas9 to DNA aptamers and TRAIL/APO2L, as well as 46 carriers, from AAV, AdV, LNPs, and exosomes to naked mRNA, sonoporation, and magnetofection. The article also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each product and vector type, as well as the current challenges faced in the practical use of gene therapy and its future potential.

Regenerative medicine for early osteoarthritis

The concept of early osteoarthritis (OA) is based on the expectation that if found and treated in the early stage, the progression of the disease might be arrested before affected joints are irreversibly destroyed. This notion of early OA detection can also bear meaning for regenerative medicine (RM) which is purposed to cure a disease by regenerating the damaged tissue. RM can be a category of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs (DMOADs) and provide an attractive treatment for OA, restoring structural damage incurred during the disease by repopulating cells and reconstituting. While cell therapy including the use of stem cells is conflated with RM, it may also comprise gene therapy, exosomes, and other cell or cell-free-derived products. Considering that not all early OA will become advanced OA and that RM has a characteristic of personalized medicine, it would be very important to foretell, even roughly, which patients will progress rapidly and who will favorably respond to regenerative treatment. Subclassification and comprehensive endotyping or phenotyping (E/P) can be very helpful in detecting the population who would benefit from RM as well as rapid progressors who need closer monitoring.

Bio-Enhanced Neoligaments Graft Bearing FE002 Primary Progenitor Tenocytes: Allogeneic Tissue Engineering & Surgical Proofs-of-Concept for Hand Ligament Regenerative Medicine

Hand tendon/ligament structural ruptures (tears, lacerations) often require surgical reconstruction and grafting, for the restauration of finger mechanical functions. Clinical-grade human primary progenitor tenocytes (FE002 cryopreserved progenitor cell source) have been previously proposed for diversified therapeutic uses within allogeneic tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. The aim of this study was to establish bioengineering and surgical proofs-of-concept for an artificial graft (Neoligaments Infinity-Lock 3 device) bearing cultured and viable FE002 primary progenitor tenocytes. Technical optimization and in vitro validation work showed that the combined preparations could be rapidly obtained (dynamic cell seeding of 10⁵ cells/cm of scaffold, 7 days of co-culture). The studied standardized transplants presented homogeneous cellular colonization in vitro (cellular alignment/coating along the scaffold fibers) and other critical functional attributes (tendon extracellular matrix component such as collagen I and aggrecan synthesis/deposition along the scaffold fibers). Notably, major safety- and functionality-related parameters/attributes of the FE002 cells/finished combination products were compiled and set forth (telomerase activity, adhesion and biological coating potentials). A two-part human cadaveric study enabled to establish clinical protocols for hand ligament cell-assisted surgery (ligamento-suspension plasty after trapeziectomy, thumb metacarpo-phalangeal ulnar collateral ligamentoplasty). Importantly, the aggregated experimental results clearly confirmed that functional and clinically usable allogeneic cell-scaffold combination products could be rapidly and robustly prepared for bio-enhanced hand ligament reconstruction. Major advantages of the considered bioengineered graft were discussed in light of existing clinical protocols based on autologous tenocyte transplantation. Overall, this study established proofs-of-concept for the translational development of a functional tissue engineering protocol in allogeneic musculoskeletal regenerative medicine, in view of a pilot clinical trial.

Engineering Inflammation-Resistant Cartilage: Bridging Gene Therapy and Tissue Engineering

Articular cartilage defects caused by traumatic injury rarely heal spontaneously and predispose into post-traumatic osteoarthritis. In the current autologous cell-based treatments the regenerative process is often hampered by the poor regenerative capacity of adult cells and the inflammatory state of the injured joint. The lack of ideal treatment options for cartilage injuries motivated the authors to tissue engineer a cartilage tissue which would be more resistant to inflammation. A clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas9 knockout of TGF-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) gene in polydactyly chondrocytes provides multivalent protection against the signals that activate the pro-inflammatory and catabolic NF-κB pathway. The TAK1-KO chondrocytes encapsulate into a hyaluronan hydrogel deposit copious cartilage extracellular matrix proteins and facilitate integration onto native cartilage, even under proinflammatory conditions. Furthermore, when implanted in vivo, compared to WT fewer pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages invade the cartilage, likely due to the lower levels of cytokines secreted by the TAK1-KO polydactyly chondrocytes. The engineered cartilage thus represents a new paradigm-shift for the creation of more potent and functional tissues for use in regenerative medicine.

Viral Gene Delivery in Chondrocytes

Viral gene transfer, known as transduction, is a powerful research tool for studying the biology of chondrocytes in novel ways and also a technology enabling the use of gene therapy for regenerating cartilage and treating diseases that affect cartilage, such as osteoarthritis. Adenovirus, retrovirus, lentivirus, and adeno-associated virus (AAV) are most commonly used to transduce chondrocytes. Although AAV is able to transduce chondrocytes in situ by intra-articular injection, chondrocytes are most commonly transduced in monolayer culture using the four vectors mentioned above. Protocols for achieving this are described, along with a discussion of the variables that can influence transduction efficiency.

Gene Delivery to Chondrocytes

Delivering genes to chondrocytes offers new possibilities both clinically, for treating conditions that affect cartilage, and in the laboratory, for studying the biology of chondrocytes. Advances in gene therapy have created a number of different viral and non-viral vectors for this purpose. These vectors may be deployed in an ex vivo fashion, where chondrocytes are genetically modified outside the body, or by in vivo delivery where the vector is introduced directly into the body; in the case of articular and meniscal cartilage in vivo delivery is typically by intra-articular injection. Ex vivo delivery is favored in strategies for enhancing cartilage repair as these can be piggy-backed on existing cell-based technologies, such as autologous chondrocyte implantation, or used in conjunction with marrow-stimulating techniques such as microfracture. In vivo delivery to articular chondrocytes has proved more difficult, because the dense, anionic, extra-cellular matrix of cartilage limits access to the chondrocytes embedded within it. As Grodzinsky and colleagues have shown, the matrix imposes strict limits on the size and charge of particles able to diffuse through the entire depth of articular cartilage. Empirical observations suggest that the larger viral vectors, such as adenovirus (~100 nm), are unable to transduce chondrocytes in situ following intra-articular injection. However, adeno-associated virus (AAV; ~25 nm) is able to do so in horse joints. AAV is presently in clinical trials for arthritis gene therapy, and it will be interesting to see whether human chondrocytes are also transduced throughout the depth of cartilage by AAV following a single intra-articular injection. Viral vectors have been used to deliver genes to the intervertebral disk but there has been little research on gene transfer to chondrocytes in other cartilaginous tissues such as nasal, auricular or tracheal cartilage.

Gene Therapy in Orthopaedics: Progress and Challenges in Pre-Clinical Development and Translation

In orthopaedics, gene-based treatment approaches are being investigated for an array of common -yet medically challenging- pathologic conditions of the skeletal connective tissues and structures (bone, cartilage, ligament, tendon, joints, intervertebral discs etc.). As the skeletal system protects the vital organs and provides weight-bearing structural support, the various tissues are principally composed of dense extracellular matrix (ECM), often with minimal cellularity and vasculature. Due to their functional roles, composition, and distribution throughout the body the skeletal tissues are prone to traumatic injury, and/or structural failure from chronic inflammation and matrix degradation. Due to a mixture of environment and endogenous factors repair processes are often slow and fail to restore the native quality of the ECM and its function. In other cases, large-scale lesions from severe trauma or tumor surgery, exceed the body’s healing and regenerative capacity. Although a wide range of exogenous gene products (proteins and RNAs) have the potential to enhance tissue repair/regeneration and inhibit degenerative disease their clinical use is hindered by the absence of practical methods for safe, effective delivery. Cumulatively, a large body of evidence demonstrates the capacity to transfer coding sequences for biologic agents to cells in the skeletal tissues to achieve prolonged delivery at functional levels to augment local repair or inhibit pathologic processes. With an eye toward clinical translation, we discuss the research progress in the primary injury and disease targets in orthopaedic gene therapy. Technical considerations important to the exploration and pre-clinical development are presented, with an emphasis on vector technologies and delivery strategies whose capacity to generate and sustain functional transgene expression in vivo is well-established.

Insights into the present and future of cartilage regeneration and joint repair

Knee osteoarthritis is the most common joint disease. It causes pain and suffering for affected patients and is the source of major economic costs for healthcare systems. Despite ongoing research, there is a lack of knowledge regarding disease mechanisms, biomarkers, and possible cures. Current treatments do not fulfill patients' long-term needs, and it often requires invasive surgical procedures with subsequent long periods of rehabilitation. Researchers and companies worldwide are working to find a suitable cell source to engineer or regenerate a functional and healthy articular cartilage tissue to implant in the damaged area. Potential cell sources to accomplish this goal include embryonic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, or induced pluripotent stem cells. The differentiation of stem cells into different tissue types is complex, and a suitable concentration range of specific growth factors is vital. The cellular microenvironment during early embryonic development provides crucial information regarding concentrations of signaling molecules and morphogen gradients as these are essential inducers for tissue development. Thus, morphogen gradients implemented in developmental protocols aimed to engineer functional cartilage tissue can potentially generate cells comparable to those within native cartilage. In this review, we have summarized the problems with current treatments, potential cell sources for cell therapy, reviewed the progress of new treatments within the regenerative cartilage field, and highlighted the importance of cell quality, characterization assays, and chemically defined protocols.

Electrically controlled mRNA delivery using a polypyrrole-graphene oxide hybrid film to promote osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells

Direct messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) delivery to target cells or tissues has revolutionized the field of biotechnology. However, the applicability of regenerative medicine is limited by the technical difficulties of various mRNA-loaded nanocarriers. Herein, we report a new conductive hybrid film that could guide osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hADMSCs) via electrically controlled mRNA delivery. To find optimal electrical conductivity and mRNA-loading capacity, the polypyrrole-graphene oxide (PPy-GO) hybrid film was electropolymerized on indium tin oxide substrates. We found that the fluorescein sodium salt, a molecule partially mimicking the physical and chemical properties of mRNAs, can be effectively absorbed and released by electrical stimulation (ES). The hADMSCs cultivated on the PPy-GO hybrid film loaded with pre-osteogenic mRNAs showed the highest osteogenic differentiation under electrical stimulation. This platform can load various types of RNAs thus highly promising as a new nucleic acid delivery tool for the development of stem cell-based therapeutics.

ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary material (electrochemical and FT-IR analysis on the film, additional SEM, AFM and C-AFM images of the film, optical and fluorescence images of cells, and the primers used for RT-qPCR analysis) is available in the online version of this article at 10.1007/s12274-022-4613-y.

Synthetic mRNA - emerging new class of drug for tissue regeneration

mRNA has the potential to be the next generation drug for tissue restoration in regenerative medicine. The variety of mRNAs that could be synthesized with the aim of increasing the expression of any required protein offers new opportunities. However, the intrinsic immunogenicity and lack of stability of mRNA has long restricted the potential of mRNA therapeutics. Fortunately, considerable progress has been made on synthetic mRNA modifications and relevant purification steps that have overcome these limitations. However, there remains a lack of efficient mRNA delivery strategies. Additionally, mRNA may need to be administered in situ via three-dimensional biomaterials. These materials, also known as transcript-activated matrices, require further consideration in terms of mRNA loading and release, immunogenicity, and other features. In this article, various limiting factors in mRNA synthesis, vector formulation, and local delivery to tissues are highlighted together with current developments and the future outlook for mRNA therapeutics in tissue regeneration.

Gene therapy for bone healing: lessons learned and new approaches

Although gene therapy has its conceptual origins in the treatment of Mendelian disorders, it has potential applications in regenerative medicine, including bone healing. Research into the use of gene therapy for bone healing began in the 1990s. Prior to this period, the highly osteogenic proteins bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 and -7 were cloned, produced in their recombinant forms and approved for clinical use. Despite their promising osteogenic properties, the clinical usefulness of recombinant BMPs is hindered by delivery problems that necessitate their application in vastly supraphysiological amounts. This generates adverse side effects, some of them severe, and raises costs; moreover, the clinical efficacy of the recombinant proteins is modest. Gene delivery offers a potential strategy for overcoming these limitations. Our research has focused on delivering a cDNA encoding human BMP-2, because the recombinant protein is Food and Drug Administration approved and there is a large body of data on its effects in people with broken bones. However, there is also a sizeable literature describing experimental results obtained with other transgenes that may directly or indirectly promote bone formation. Data from experiments in small animal models confirm that intralesional delivery of BMP-2 cDNA is able to heal defects efficiently and safely while generating transient, local BMP-2 concentrations 2-3 log orders less than those needed by recombinant BMP-2. The next challenge is to translate this information into a clinically expedient technology for bone healing. Our present research focuses on the use of genetically modified, allografted cells and chemically modified messenger RNA.

LINC00662 facilitates osteosarcoma progression via sponging miR-103a-3p and regulating SIK2 expression

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) involvement in regulating assorted cancers has been determined. Long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 662 (LINC00662) has been studied in gastric cancer. However, its function was not elucidated in osteosarcoma (OS). Thus, we aimed to discover LINC00662 function and the corresponding mechanism in OS. In this study, we found that LINC00662 displayed high expression in OS cells. LINC00662 down-regulation negatively affected OS cell malignant behaviors and tumor growth. Subsequently, miR-103a-3p was proven to bind with LINC00662 and overexpression of miR-103a-3p inhibited OS cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Then, SIK2, the downstream of miR-103a-3p, was up-regulated in OS cells and positively regulated by LINC00662. In addition, knockdown of SIK2 exerted inhibitory effects on proliferative, migratory and invaded capacities of OS cells. More interestingly, miR-103a-3p depletion or SIK2 overexpression restored the impacts of down-regulated LINC00662 on OS cells. In conclusion, LINC00662 could facilitate OS progression via miR-103a-3p/SIK2 axis.

Orthopaedic Gene Therapy: Twenty-Five Years On

»

Orthopaedics pioneered the expansion of gene therapy beyond its traditional scope of diseases that are caused by rare single-gene defects. Orthopaedic applications of gene therapy are most developed in the areas of arthritis and regenerative medicine, but several additional possibilities exist.

»

Invossa, an ex vivo gene therapeutic for osteoarthritis, was approved in South Korea in 2017, but its approval was retracted in 2019 and remains under appeal; a Phase-III clinical trial of Invossa has restarted in the U.S.

»

There are several additional clinical trials for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis that could lead to approved gene therapeutics for arthritis.

»

Bone-healing and cartilage repair are additional areas that are attracting considerable research; intervertebral disc degeneration and the healing of ligaments, tendons, and menisci are other applications of interest. Orthopaedic tumors, genetic diseases, and aseptic loosening are additional potential targets.

»

If successful, these endeavors will expand the scope of gene therapy from providing expensive medicines for a few patients to providing affordable medicines for many.

Current status of regenerative medicine in osteoarthritis

The high prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA), as well as the current lack of disease-modifying drugs for OA, has provided a rationale for regenerative medicine as a possible treatment modality for OA treatment. In this editorial, the current status of regenerative medicine in OA including stem cells, exosomes, and genes is summarized along with the author’s perspectives. Despite a tremendous interest, so far there is very little evidence proving the efficacy of this modality for clinical application. As symptomatic relief is not sufficient to justify the high cost associated with regenerative medicine, definitive structural improvement that would last for years or decades and obviate or delay the need for joint arthroplasty is essential for regenerative medicine to retain a place among OA treatment methods.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):134–136.

Genetics in Cartilage Lesions: Basic Science and Therapy Approaches

Cartilage lesions have a multifactorial nature, and genetic factors are their strongest determinants. As biochemical and genetic studies have dramatically progressed over the past decade, the molecular basis of cartilage pathologies has become clearer. Several homeostasis abnormalities within cartilaginous tissue have been found, including various structural changes, differential gene expression patterns, as well as altered epigenetic regulation. However, the efficient treatment of cartilage pathologies represents a substantial challenge. Understanding the complex genetic background pertaining to cartilage pathologies is useful primarily in the context of seeking new pathways leading to disease progression as well as in developing new targeted therapies. A technology utilizing gene transfer to deliver therapeutic genes to the site of injury is quickly becoming an emerging approach in cartilage renewal. The goal of this work is to provide an overview of the genetic basis of chondral lesions and the different approaches of the most recent systems exploiting therapeutic gene transfer in cartilage repair. The integration of tissue engineering with viral gene vectors is a novel and active area of research. However, despite promising preclinical data, this therapeutic concept needs to be supported by the growing body of clinical trials.

Applications of CRISPR for musculoskeletal research

The ability to edit DNA at the nucleotide level using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) systems is a relatively new investigative tool that is revolutionizing the analysis of many aspects of human health and disease, including orthopaedic disease. CRISPR, adapted for mammalian cell genome editing from a bacterial defence system, has been shown to be a flexible, programmable, scalable, and easy-to-use gene editing tool. Recent improvements increase the functionality of CRISPR through the engineering of specific elements of CRISPR systems, the discovery of new, naturally occurring CRISPR molecules, and modifications that take CRISPR beyond gene editing to the regulation of gene transcription and the manipulation of RNA. Here, the basics of CRISPR genome editing will be reviewed, including a description of how it has transformed some aspects of molecular musculoskeletal research, and will conclude by speculating what the future holds for the use of CRISPR-related treatments and therapies in clinical orthopaedic practice.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(7):351–359.