1
|
Regis D, Cason M, Magnan B. Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of risk factors and preventive options. World J Orthop 2024; 15:501-511. [PMID: 38947255 PMCID: PMC11212535 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful elective operations in orthopedic surgery for improving pain and functional disability in patients with end-stage joint disease. However, dislocation continues to be a troublesome complication after THA, as it is a leading cause of revision and is associated with substantial social, health, and economic costs. It is a relatively rare, usually early occurrence that depends on both the patients' characteristics and the surgical aspects. The most recent and important finding is the special attention to be given preoperatively to spinopelvic mobility, which is closely related to the incidence of dislocation. Consequently, clinical and radiographic assessment of the lumbar spine is mandatory to identify an altered pelvic tilt that could suggest a different positioning of the cup. Lumbar spinal fusion is currently considered a risk factor for dislocation and revision regardless of whether it is performed prior to or after THA. Surgical options for its treatment and prevention include the use of prostheses with large diameter of femoral head size, dual mobility constructs, constrained liners, and modular neck stems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dario Regis
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Veneto, Italy
| | - Mattia Cason
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Veneto, Italy
| | - Bruno Magnan
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Integrated University Hospital, Verona 37126, Veneto, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dubin JA, Westrich GH. Less groin pain with dual-mobility bearings versus fixed bearings in total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2024; 34:15-20. [PMID: 36891584 DOI: 10.1177/11207000231158722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The relationship between implant type, dual mobility (DM) or fixed bearing (FB), and postoperative groin pain remains unexplored. We examined the incidence of groin pain in DM implants and compare this to a cohort of FB THA patients. METHODS From 2006 to 2018, a single surgeon performed 875 DM THA and 856 FB THA procedures with 2.8-year and 3.1-year follow-up, respectively. Each patient received a questionnaire postoperatively and was asked if they had any groin pain (yes/no). Secondary measurements were implant characteristics such as head size, head offset, cup size, and cup-to-head ratio. Additional PROMs that were collected included: Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, Pain visual analogue scale (Pain VAS), and range of motion (ROM). RESULTS The incidence of groin pain was 2.3% in the DM THA cohort and 6.3% in the FB THA group (p < 0.001). Also, low head offset (⩽0 mm) had a significant odds ratio (1.61) for groin pain in both cohorts. There was no significant difference in terms of revision rate between the cohorts (2.5% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.39) at the latest follow up. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated a lower incidence of groin pain (2.3%) in patients with a DM bearing compared to a FB (6.3%) and a greater risk of groin pain with low head offset (<0 mm). As such, surgeons should try to recreate offset of the hip compared to the contralateral side to avoid groin pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy A Dubin
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geoffrey H Westrich
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wakeling CP, Wilson MJ, Whitehouse SL, Howell JR. Mixed manufacturer dual mobility bearing and the Exeter V40 Stem: is it safe? Short-term results in primary and revision hip replacement. Acta Orthop Belg 2023; 89:340-347. [PMID: 37924552 DOI: 10.52628/89.2.6812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
The aim is to review clinical and radiological outcomes for all cases of primary and revision THA, combining a cemented stem (Exeter V40) with a dual mobility component from a different manufacturer (SERF Novae), to evaluate whether concerns regarding mixing components from different manufacturers are justified. We identified 72 hip replacements performed between May 2010 and December 2015 using the SERF Novae dual mobility cup with an Exeter V40 stem, the majority of which were cemented (90%) and revisions (58%). Patients were evaluated clinically and radiologically at a minimum of two years. There were five (6.9%) dislocations; three (4.2%) requiring revision - one of which was an intra-prosthetic disarticulation and two infections. No cases were lost to follow-up and 49 surviving cases were reviewed at a mean of 4.0 (range 1.8-8.1) years following surgery. Pain and functional outcome scores all improved. There were no radiological failures and no revisions for aseptic loosening of stem or cup. The combination of Exeter cemented stem with a dual mobility bearing from a different manufacturer results in acceptable short-term outcomes in terms of hip stability, revision rates and patient-reported measures.
Collapse
|
4
|
Iljazi A, Sørensen MS, Weber KS, Villadsen A, Eriksson F, Petersen MM. Fully constrained acetabular liner vs. dual mobility hip joint in the surgical treatment of metastatic bone disease of the hip: study protocol for a randomized, open-label, two-arm, non-inferiority trial evaluating the post-operative hip dislocation rate. Trials 2023; 24:204. [PMID: 36934286 PMCID: PMC10024853 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07237-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to metastatic bone disease of the hip (MBD) are at an increased risk of post-operative joint dislocation compared to other populations. Different joint solutions have been developed with the purpose of reducing the dislocation risk compared to regular THAs. One of these solutions, the constrained liner (CL), has been used increasingly at our department in recent years. This design, however, is prone to polyethylene wear and higher revision rates. An alternative is the dual mobility cup (DM), which has been shown to reduce the risk of dislocation in other high-risk populations. Few studies have investigated DM for THA due to MBD, and no studies have directly compared these two treatments in this population. We therefore decided to conduct a trial to investigate whether DM is non-inferior to CL regarding the post-operative joint dislocation risk in patients receiving THA due to MBD. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is a single-center, randomized, open-label, two-arm, non-inferiority trial. We will include 146 patients with MBD of the hip who are planned for THA at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet. Patients with previous osteosynthesis or endoprosthetic surgery of the afflicted hip, or who are planned to receive partial pelvic reconstruction or total femoral replacement, will be excluded. Patients will be stratified by whether subtrochanteric bone resection will be performed and allocated to either CL or DM in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome is the 6 months post-operative joint dislocation rate. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, implant survival, the rate of other surgical- and post-operative complications, and quality of life and functional outcome scores. DISCUSSION This study is designed to investigate whether DM is non-inferior to CL regarding the risk of post-operative dislocation in patients receiving THA due to MBD. To our knowledge, this trial is the first of its kind. Knowledge gained from this trial will help guide surgeons in choosing a joint solution that minimizes the risk of dislocation and, ultimately, reduces the need for repeat surgeries in this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05461313. Registered on July 15 2022. This trial is reported according to the items in the WHO Trial Registration Data Set (Version 1.3.1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afrim Iljazi
- grid.475435.4Musculosketal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michala Skovlund Sørensen
- grid.475435.4Musculosketal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kolja Sebastian Weber
- grid.475435.4Musculosketal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Allan Villadsen
- grid.475435.4Musculosketal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Frank Eriksson
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5 Opg. B, Building: 15-2-13, Postboks 2099, DK-1014 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Mørk Petersen
- grid.475435.4Musculosketal Tumor Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital – Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kenanidis E, Kakoulidis P, Anagnostis P, Potoupnis M, Tsiridis E. Constrained liners revisited: favourable mid-term results in patients with high-risk of dislocation: technical considerations for the optimal outcome. Hip Int 2023; 33:53-61. [PMID: 33896259 DOI: 10.1177/11207000211010712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcomes of constrained liners (CLs) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain inconclusive. We evaluated the mid-term performance of CLs in a consecutive series of high-risk dislocation patients undergoing primary or revision THA performed by a single surgeon. The survival, dislocation rate, complications, and functional patients' scores were assessed. Surgical tips to enhance outcomes were reviewed. METHODS 45 patients who received the Trident Tripolar CL between 2010 to 2019 were retrospectively evaluated from Arthroplasty Registry Thessaloniki. There were 17 primary and 28 revision THAs. The primary indications for using CL were severe abductor insufficiency or comorbidities, increasing the dislocation risk in primary, and recurrent dislocation or abductor insufficiency in revision THAs. The mean patient's age was 68.5 (±14.5) years, and the mean follow-up 3.81 (±1.66) years. RESULTS There were 2 dislocations and 1 deep infection in the revision group. For any reason, the cumulative 6-year survival rate was 93.3%, 100% for primary, and 89.3% for revision THAs. The mean overall CL survival was 76.3 months for any reason (95% CI, 68.1-84.5) and 80.5 months for dislocation (95% CI, 75.8-85.2). The mean postoperative functional scores were significantly improved (p < 0.001) at the latest follow-up. CONCLUSIONS CLs can provide hip stability and durable fixation in selected low-demand patients with high-risk for dislocation after primary and revision THA at mid-term follow-up. Careful patient selection and the refined surgical technique aiming at the neutral liner position and considering the high CLs' offset relative to stem-neck impingement are necessary to maximise outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eustathios Kenanidis
- Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Kakoulidis
- Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Anagnostis
- Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Michael Potoupnis
- Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eleftherios Tsiridis
- Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ciolli G, Mesnard G, Deroche E, Gunst S, Batailler C, Servien E, Lustig S. Is Cemented Dual-Mobility Cup a Reliable Option in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2022; 13:jpm13010081. [PMID: 36675742 PMCID: PMC9867154 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13010081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Instability is a common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The dual mobility cup (DMC) allows a reduction in the dislocation rate. The goal of this systematic review was to clarify the different uses and outcomes according to the indications of the cemented DMC (C-DMC). Methods: A systematic review was performed using the keywords "Cemented Dual Mobility Cup" or "Cemented Tripolar Cup" without a publication year limit. Of the 465 studies identified, only 56 were eligible for the study. Results: The overall number of C-DMC was 3452 in 3426 patients. The mean follow-up was 45.9 months (range 12-98.4). In most of the cases (74.5%) C-DMC was used in a revision setting. In 57.5% DMC was cemented directly into the bone, in 39.6% into an acetabular reinforcement and in 3.2% into a pre-existing cup. The overall dislocation rate was 2.9%. The most frequent postoperative complications were periprosthetic infections (2%); aseptic loosening (1.1%) and mechanical failure (0.5%). The overall revision rate was 4.4%. The average survival rate of C-DMC at the last follow-up was 93.5%. Conclusions: C-DMC represents an effective treatment option to limit the risk of dislocations and complications for both primary and revision surgery. C-DMC has good clinical outcomes and a low complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Ciolli
- Orthopaedic Department, Lyon North University Hospital, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
- Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Sacred Heart Catholic University, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Guillaume Mesnard
- Orthopaedic Department, Lyon North University Hospital, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Etienne Deroche
- Orthopaedic Department, Lyon North University Hospital, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
| | - Stanislas Gunst
- Orthopaedic Department, Lyon North University Hospital, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
- Univ Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, IFST-TAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, 69622 Lyon, France
| | - Cécile Batailler
- Orthopaedic Department, Lyon North University Hospital, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
- Univ Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, IFST-TAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, 69622 Lyon, France
| | - Elvire Servien
- Orthopaedic Department, Lyon North University Hospital, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
- LIBM—EA 7424, Interuniversity Laboratory of Biology of Mobility, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, 69622 Lyon, France
| | - Sébastien Lustig
- Orthopaedic Department, Lyon North University Hospital, Hôpital de La Croix Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 103 Grande Rue de la Croix Rousse, 69004 Lyon, France
- Univ Lyon, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, IFST-TAR, LBMC UMR_T9406, 69622 Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Do Dual-mobility Cups Reduce Revision Risk in Femoral Neck Fractures Compared With Conventional THA Designs? An International Meta-analysis of Arthroplasty Registries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2022; 480:1912-1925. [PMID: 35767813 PMCID: PMC9473769 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dual-mobility cups in THA were designed to reduce prosthesis instability and the subsequent risk of revision surgery in high-risk patients, such as those with hip fractures. However, there are limited data from clinical studies reporting a revision benefit of dual-mobility over conventional THA. Collaboration between anthroplasty registries provides an opportunity to describe international practice variation and compare between-country, all-cause revision rates for dual-mobility and conventional THA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES We summarized observational data from multiple arthroplasty registries for patients receiving either a dual-mobility or conventional THA to ask: (1) Is dual-mobility use associated with a difference in risk of all-cause revision surgery compared with conventional THA? (2) Are there specific patient characteristics associated with dual-mobility use in the hip fracture population? (3) Has the use of dual-mobility constructs changed over time in patients receiving a THA for hip fracture? METHODS Six member registries of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (from Australia, Denmark, Sweden, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States) provided custom aggregate data reports stratified by acetabular cup type (dual-mobility or conventional THA) in primary THA for hip fracture between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2019; surgical approach; and patient demographic data (sex, mean age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and BMI). The cumulative percent revision and mortality were calculated for each registry. To determine a global hazard ratio of all-cause revision for dual-mobility compared with conventional THA designs, we used a pseudoindividual patient data approach to pool Kaplan-Meier prosthesis revision data from each registry and perform a meta-analysis. The pseudoindividual patient data approach is a validated technique for meta-analysis of aggregate time-to-event survival data, such as revision surgery, from multiple sources. Data were available for 15,024 dual-mobility THAs and 97,200 conventional THAs performed for hip fractures during the study period. RESULTS After pooling of complete Kaplan-Meier survival data from all six registries, the cumulative percent revision for conventional THA was 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.2% to 4.5%) and 4.7% (95% CI 4.3% to 5.3%) for dual-mobility THA at 5 years. We did not demonstrate a lower risk of all-cause revision for patients receiving dual-mobility over conventional THA designs for hip fracture in the meta-analysis once between-registry differences were adjusted for (HR 0.96 [95% CI 0.86 to 1.06]). A lower proportion of dual-mobility procedures were revised for dislocation than conventional THAs (0.9% versus 1.4%) but a higher proportion were revised for infection (1.2% versus 0.8%). In most registries, a greater proportion of dual-mobility THA patients were older, had more comorbidities, and underwent a posterior approach compared with conventional THA (p < 0.001). The proportion of dual-mobility THA used to treat hip fractures increased in each registry over time and constituted 21% (2438 of 11,874) of all THA procedures in 2019. CONCLUSION The proportion of dual-mobility THAs in patients with hip fractures increased over time, but there was large variation in use across countries represented here. Dual-mobility cups were not associated with a reduction in the overall risk of revision surgery in patients with hip fractures. A randomized controlled trial powered to detect the incidence of dislocation and subsequent revision surgery is required to clarify the efficacy of dual-mobility cups to treat hip fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
|
8
|
Wakeling CP, Sandiford NA, Ghani R, Bridle SJ, Mitchell PA, Hutt JR. Dual-mobility bearings in complex revision hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2022; 32:460-465. [PMID: 33736488 DOI: 10.1177/1120700021999795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is associated with an increased dislocation risk. Dual-mobility (DM) bearings have been used to address this issue. Such constructs offer increased range of motion and enhanced stability whilst avoiding some issues associated with fully-constrained devices. DM bearings have been used in our unit since 2013. METHODS All rTHA cases since 2013 were reviewed using the following criteria: (1) use of a DM bearing; (2) extensive soft tissue or bone loss resulting from ARMD, infection or multiple revisions, or requiring custom or megaprosthetic reconstruction; (3) minimum 2-month follow-up. RESULTS 52 cases were identified with a median of 2 previous operations (range 1-6) and mean follow-up of 14 (2-41) months. The Novae-Stick component was used in 50 cases, the Avantage in 2 and the Trident MDM in 1 case. 19 required acetabular reconstruction using trabecular metal and four required custom acetabular components. 19 required femoral reconstruction with a proximal or total femoral replacement.Postoperatively, 8 patients (15.4%) sustained a dislocation at a mean of 1.6 (range 1-3) months. 3 (5.8%) requiring re-revision. 1 required excision arthroplasty and 2 a constrained liner, 1 of which went on to have further instability. There were no intraprosthetic dislocations. CONCLUSIONS Dual-mobility components are a viable option in the complex rTHA setting. Early dislocations can occur but the rate of instability is acceptable in this high-risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rafia Ghani
- St. George's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sinclair ST, Klika AK, Jin Y, Piuzzi NS, Higuera CA. The Impact of Surgeon Variability on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:S479-S487.e1. [PMID: 35248750 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-related and surgery-related factors have been shown to be drivers of outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, the impact of intersurgeon variability is poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to assess the following: (1) overall effect of surgeon on 1-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and 90-day readmission following THA; and (2) variability in 1-year PROMs among surgeons. METHODS A prospective cohort of 3,695 patients who underwent THA between 2016 and 2018 was included. Seventy-eight percent of patients completed 1-year follow-up. Thirty-one surgeons from a large healthcare system were included. Likelihood ratio tests analyzed the relationship among surgeon and 1-year Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)-Pain, HOOS-Physical Function Short-Form, HOOS-Joint Replacement, University of California, Los Angeles activity score, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, LOS, discharge disposition, and 90-day readmission. Mixed-effect proportional odds and logistic regression models were used to determine variable importance for each outcome. RESULTS In total, 90.5% of patients responded positively to 1-year Patient Acceptable Symptom State. There was a significant association among surgeon and 1-year PROMs, LOS, discharge disposition (P < .001), and readmission (P = .002). For HOOS-Pain, Physical Function Short-Form, and Joint Replacement, surgeon (Akaike information criterion increase: 34.6, 18.7, 17.1, respectively) was a greater contributor to outcome than patient-level factors, including age, gender, and comorbidity. Differences in the highest and lowest median probability of achieving any given score on 1-year PROMs ranged from 11% to 18.5%. Variability was not explained by approach (P = .431) or case volume (correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.19). CONCLUSION Surgeon-level variability appears to be a greater driver of 1-year PROMs than some patient-level characteristics. Incorporating surgeon as a variable is beneficial for model-fitting and important for increasing value in THA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SaTia T Sinclair
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Alison K Klika
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Yuxuan Jin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Carlos A Higuera
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tripolar Constrained and Dual Mobility Liners Are Both Successful When Cemented Into Tantalum Acetabular Revision Shells in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 2022; 14:53-58. [PMID: 35242957 PMCID: PMC8881686 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Instability is a common complication after revision total hip arthroplasty. Tripolar constrained (TC) and dual mobility (DM) liners cemented into tantalum acetabular revision (TM) shells are established alternatives that reduce instability risk. This study compares outcomes of TC and DM liners cemented into TM shells in complex revision hip replacements. Methods Fifty cases using a TM shell and a TC or DM cemented liner with at least 12 months of follow-up were identified. There were 25 TC and 25 DM liners. Clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes were collected. Reasons for re-revision and failures were analyzed. Results The average age was 73 years in the TC group and 75 years in the DM group. The median follow-up duration was 50 months (23 - 96) and 13 months (12 – 21) for the TC and DM groups, respectively. The mean Harris Hip Score improved from 37 to 61 for the TC group and from 51 to 73 in the DM group at the last review. Two TC cases required revision for wear and liner failure. One DM insert was changed at reoperation for periprosthetic femur fracture. There were no failures of cement fixation in either group and no revisions for cup loosening. Conclusions In complex revision hip replacement with a history of instability or judged to have a high risk of instability postoperatively, TC and DM liners cemented into tantalum revision shells are both successful, giving acceptable results. The improved arc of movement with DM liners, minimizing impingement, makes them preferable except when there is a global abductor deficiency or severe joint laxity.
Collapse
|
11
|
Paderni S, Pari C, Raggini F, Busatto C, Delmastro E, Belluati A. Third generation Dual Mobility Cups: could be the future in total hip arthroplasty? A five-year experience with dualis. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2022; 92:e2021553. [PMID: 35604267 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92is3.12541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of dual mobility (DM) is currently approved as a valid option for reducing the risk of dislocation, with an incidence ranging from 0% to 4.6%. The principle is to achieve a high joint stability through a large diameter polyethylene (PE) liner, and to reduce cutting forces due to a "low-friction" head-liner coupling mechanism. METHODS From March 2015 to March 2020, 138 patients were treated with Dualis Cup (Gruppo Bioimpianti-Peschiera Borromeo, MI, Italy) for a total of 141 implants (three cases were bilateral). The average age at the time of the surgery was 77. Patients' clinical and X-ray follow-up was at 1, 3, 6, 12 months and then once a year. RESULTS Seven patients (4.9%) had complications which required a second surgery, but only one case (0.7%) of intraprosthetic dislocation (which required cup revision), was directly ascribable to the DM cup. CONCLUSIONS Improvements in design and materials of the third generation DM cups allowed both to reduce the rate of dislocations in high-risk patients (i.e., patients with neuro-muscular diseases and cognitive disorders, patients needing revisions, osteosynthesis failures, femoral neck fractures) and to achieve a survival rate similar to standard cups, ensuring a range of motion (ROM) very close to the physiological one. In our brief experience, Dualis Cups showed results comparable to those reported in the literature for Dual Mobility. If this data is confirmed by long-term studies, the use of DM cups could be extended even for young patients with high functional demands. (www.actabiomedica.it).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Paderni
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy.
| | - Carlotta Pari
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy.
| | - Filippo Raggini
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Carlo Busatto
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy.
| | - Elena Delmastro
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alberto Belluati
- Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sculco PK, Wright T, Malahias MA, Gu A, Bostrom M, Haddad F, Jerabek S, Bolognesi M, Fehring T, Gonzalez DellaValle A, Jiranek W, Walter W, Paprosky W, Garbuz D, Sculco T, Abdel M, Boettner F, Benazzo F, Buttaro M, Choi D, Engh CA, Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Garcia-Rey E, Gehrke T, Griffin WL, Hansen E, Hozack WJ, Jones S, Lee GC, Lipman J, Manktelow A, McLaren AC, Nelissen R, O’Hara L, Perka C, Sporer S. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium. HSS J 2022; 18:8-41. [PMID: 35082557 PMCID: PMC8753540 DOI: 10.1177/15563316211034850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Despite growing evidence supporting the evaluation, classification, and treatment of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement, advancements have not been systematically incorporated into a single document, and therefore, a comprehensive review of the treatment of severe acetabular bone loss is needed. The Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center at Hospital for Special Surgery held an Acetabular Bone Loss Symposium on June 21, 2019, to answer the following questions: What are the trends, emerging technologies, and areas of future research related to the evaluation and management of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement? What constitutes the optimal workup and management strategies for acetabular bone loss? The 36 international experts convened were divided into groups, each assigned to discuss 1 of 4 topics: (1) preoperative planning and postoperative assessment; (2) implant selection, management of osteolysis, and management of massive bone loss; (3) the treatment challenges of pelvic discontinuity, periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and poor bone biology; and (4) the principles of reconstruction and classification of acetabular bone loss. Each group came to consensus, when possible, based on an extensive literature review. This document provides an overview of these 4 areas, the consensus each group arrived at, and directions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter K. Sculco
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA,Peter K. Sculco, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E. 70th St., New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | | | | | - Alexander Gu
- George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Fares Haddad
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Sport, Exercise & Health, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - William Walter
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Wayne Paprosky
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Donald Garbuz
- Department of Orthopaedics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Monobloc Dual Mobility With a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up: A Safe and Effective Solution in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:83-88. [PMID: 34593287 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Instability constitutes over 20% of revisions after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Dual mobility (DM) designs were introduced as a solution to this problem. However, the few publications that have reported promising results for monobloc DM constructs have been limited by sample size or length of follow-up. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term outcomes (minimum 5-year follow-up) of a single-surgeon series utilizing a monobloc DM acetabular component in patients with high risk for dislocation. METHODS This is a single-surgeon consecutive series of 207 primary THAs implanted with a monobloc DM component in patients who were considered at high risk for dislocation. Patient demographics and case-specific data were collected retrospectively. All patients had a minimum of 5-year follow-up. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess continuous variables, whereas categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. Survival probability was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Radiographic analysis did not reveal acetabular radiolucency in any patients, and there were no revisions for aseptic loosening. In addition, there were no dislocations. Seven of 205 patients (3.4%) were revised, 5 on the femoral side due to periprosthetic fracture and the remaining two for infection. Survivorship of the acetabular component from revision was 99%. The mean Veteran RAND (VR-12) physical score improved from 7 (standard deviation [SD]: 13.7) preoperatively to 9.5 (SD: 17.6) at the final follow-up. Similarly, the hip disability osteoarthritis score improved from 8 (SD: 17.9) preoperatively to 21.2 (SD: 37). CONCLUSION Monobloc DM components reliably prevent dislocation after primary THA in high-risk patients. At mid-term follow-up, this DM monobloc component demonstrates excellent implant survivorship, radiographic fixation, and improved functional outcomes.
Collapse
|
14
|
Montgomery S, Bourget-Murray J, You DZ, Nherera L, Khoshbin A, Atrey A, Powell JN. Cost-effectiveness of dual-mobility components in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B:1783-1790. [PMID: 34847713 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b12.bjj-2021-0495.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with dual-mobility components (DM-THA) has been shown to decrease the risk of dislocation in the setting of a displaced neck of femur fracture compared to conventional single-bearing THA (SB-THA). This study assesses if the clinical benefit of a reduced dislocation rate can justify the incremental cost increase of DM-THA compared to SB-THA. METHODS Costs and benefits were established for patients aged 75 to 79 years over a five-year time period in the base case from the Canadian Health Payer's perspective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis assessed the robustness of the base case model conclusions. RESULTS DM-THA was found to be cost-effective, with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAD $46,556 (£27,074) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Sensitivity analysis revealed DM-THA was not cost-effective across all age groups in the first two years. DM-THA becomes cost-effective for those aged under 80 years at time periods from five to 15 years, but was not cost-effective for those aged 80 years and over at any timepoint. To be cost-effective at ten years in the base case, DM-THA must reduce the risk of dislocation compared to SB-THA by at least 62%. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed DM-THA was 58% likely to be cost-effective in the base case. CONCLUSION Treating patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture using DM-THA components may be cost-effective compared to SB-THA in patients aged under 80 years. However, future research will help determine if the modelled rates of adverse events hold true. Surgeons should continue to use clinical judgement and consider individual patients' physiological age and risk factors for dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(12):1783-1790.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Z You
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Amir Khoshbin
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Amit Atrey
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - James Nelson Powell
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary McCaig Institute for Bone and Joint Health, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pakarinen O, Lainiala O, Reito A, Neuvonen P, Mäkelä K, Eskelinen A. Implant survival of 662 dual-mobility cups and 727 constrained liners in primary THA: small femoral head size increases the cumulative incidence of revision. Acta Orthop 2021; 92:658-664. [PMID: 34238130 PMCID: PMC8641668 DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2021.1939597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose - In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the risk for dislocation can be reduced using either dual-mobility cups (DMCs) or constrained liners (CLs). There are few studies comparing these concepts in primary THA. Therefore, we compared the cumulative incidence of revision in primary THA patients treated with DMC or CL with varying head sizes with conventional THA patients as reference group.Patients and methods - We performed a cohort study based on the Finnish arthroplasty register, comparing DMCs and CLs operated over the period 2000-2017. DMCs were divided into 2 groups based on the implant design: "DMC Trident" group (n = 399) and "DMC Others" group (n = 263). CLs were divided based on the femoral head size: "CL 36 mm" group (n = 425) and "CL < 36 mm" group (n = 302). All conventional primary THAs operated on in 2000-2017 with 28-36 mm femoral head were included as control group ("Conventional THA" group, n = 102,276). Implant survival was calculated by the corresponding cumulative incidence function with revision as the endpoint and death as competing event. Also, the prevalence of different reasons for revision was compared.Results - The 6-year cumulative incidence function estimates for the first revision were 6.9% (95% CI 4.0-9.7) for DMC Trident, 5.0% (CI 1.5-8.5) for DMC Others, 13% (CI 9.3-17) for CL < 36 mm, 6.3% (3.7-8.9) for CL 36 mm, and 4.7% (CI 4.5-4.8) for control group (conventional THA). The prevalence of dislocation revision was high (5.0%, CI 2.9-8.2) in the CL < 36 mm group compared with other groups.Interpretation - The DMC and CL 36 mm groups had promising mid-term survival rates, comparable to those of primary conventional THA group. The revision rate of CLs with < 36 mm head was high, mostly due to high prevalence of dislocation revisions. Therefore, CLs with 36 mm femoral head should be preferred over smaller ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oskari Pakarinen
- Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere,Correspondence: Oskari Pakarinen Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere
| | - Olli Lainiala
- Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere,Department of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere
| | - Aleksi Reito
- Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere
| | - Perttu Neuvonen
- Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere
| | - Keijo Mäkelä
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Antti Eskelinen
- Coxa Hospital for Joint Replacement, and Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gray Stephens CE, Ashaye OJ, Ellenbogen TD, Sexton SA, Middleton RG. Dual Mobility hip replacement in hip fractures offer functional equivalence and a stability advantage - A case-controlled study. Injury 2021; 52:3017-3021. [PMID: 33518294 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hip fracture is a common and serious injury in the elderly. Hip arthroplasty is the most frequently performed procedure for patients with an intracapsular hip fracture. The majority of national guidelines recommend total hip arthroplasty (THA) for more active patients. Literature indicates significant stability advantages for dual mobility (DM) acetabular components in non-emergent scenarios. Evidence supporting the use of DM in hip fracture patients is limited. AIM We set out to ascertain if DM implants offer stability and/or functional advantages over standard THA in patients with hip fracture. METHODS We utilised our local National Hip Fracture Database to identify all patients undergoing either a standard or DM THA for hip fracture (n=477) We matched cohorts based on age, AMTS, mobility status pre-operatively, gender, ASA and source of admission. Our primary outcome of interest was functional status using the oxford hip score (OHS). Secondary outcome measures included dislocation, fracture and deep infection requiring further surgery. RESULTS 62 patient pairs were available for this study. Mean OHS for DM THA was 41.5 and for standard THA this was 42.7 (p=0.58). There were 4 dislocations in the standard THA group and 0 with DM THA. No difference was seen with infection or peri-prosthetic fracture. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates functional equivalence between DM and standard THA. In addition it shows a trend towards less dislocation with DM THA. Cost savings from less instability may outweigh initial prosthesis costs. This study suggests a suitably powered RCT using instability as the primary outcome measure is indicated.
Collapse
|
17
|
Mancino F, Jones CW, Sculco TP, Sculco PK, Maccauro G, De Martino I. Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes of Constrained Acetabular Liners in Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36:3028-3041. [PMID: 34030877 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several studies have evaluated the survivorship and clinical outcomes of constrained acetabular liners (CALs) in complex primary and revision total hip arthroplasty with hip instability; however, there remains no consensus on the overall performance of this constrained implant. We therefore performed a systematic review of the literature to examine survivorship and complication rate of CAL usage. METHODS A systematic review of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted for English articles using various combinations of keywords. RESULTS In all, 37 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 4152 CALs were implanted. The all-cause reoperation-free survivorship was 79.9%. The overall complication rate was 22.2%. Dislocation was the most common complications observed and the most frequent reason for reoperation with an incidence of 9.4% and 9.2%, respectively. Infection after CAL placement had an incidence of 4.6%. The reoperation rate for aseptic acetabular component loosening was 2.9%. Overall, patients had improved outcomes as documented by postoperative hip scores. CONCLUSION CALs usage have a relatively high complication rate, particularly when compared with current bearing alternatives (dual mobility cups and large diameter femoral heads), however, it remains a valuable salvage procedure in complex patients affected by recurrent dislocation and implant instability. Newer designs have shown reduced impingement and higher survivorship free from dislocation. However, CALs should only be used when the reasons of instability have been correctly recognized and optimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Mancino
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck studies, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Christopher W Jones
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Orthopaedic Research Foundation of Western Australia (ORFWA), Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Thomas P Sculco
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Peter K Sculco
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Giulio Maccauro
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck studies, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Ivan De Martino
- Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Aging, Neurological, Orthopaedic and Head-Neck studies, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Spece H, Ouellette ES, Jones OL, MacDonald DW, Piuzzi NS, Lee GC, Mont MA, Klein GR, Kurtz SM. Fretting Corrosion, Third-Body Polyethylene Damage, and Cup Positioning in Primary vs Revision Dual Mobility Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36:S80-S87. [PMID: 33610405 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dual mobility (DM) articulations were introduced for total hip arthroplasty to reduce the risk of instability for patients who have a high risk of dislocation. The use of DM constructs in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty has been steadily increasing, leading to concerns regarding potential risks of fretting corrosion, polyethylene wear, metal release, and failure due to component positioning. METHODS A total of 56 retrieved DM constructs were collected. The inner and outer polyethylene liner surfaces were assessed for 7 damage mechanisms, and fretting corrosion was evaluated for the femoral stem, head, and modular liner. Three polyethylene liners with the greatest amounts of embedded debris were examined using scanning electron microscopy. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was used to determine the elemental content of the debris. Acetabular cup orientation was analyzed radiographically using the EBRA (Einzel-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse) method. RESULTS The devices were revised most frequently for infection (36%), loosening (21%), and instability/dislocation (18%). The most common polyethylene damage mechanisms were scratching, pitting, burnishing, and embedded debris, and no difference in total damage was found between primary and revision cases. Scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy revealed that debris morphology and composition were consistent with porous titanium coating, resulting from cup loosening or broken screws and augments. A total of 71% and 50% of the constructs were determined to be within the Lewinnek safe zone for inclination and anteversion, respectively. CONCLUSION The most notable mechanisms of surface damage were due to third-body debris, especially for the polyethylene surfaces which articulate against cobalt-chromium femoral heads and acetabular liners. Scratching of the femoral head and the metal liner from this debris may support the clinical use of ceramic for DM bearing surfaces in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Spece
- Implant Research Core, Drexel University School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eric S Ouellette
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Exponent Inc, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Olivia L Jones
- Implant Research Core, Drexel University School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel W MacDonald
- Implant Research Core, Drexel University School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Gwo-Chin Lee
- Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michael A Mont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital at Northwell Health, New York City, NY
| | - Gregg R Klein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ
| | - Steven M Kurtz
- Implant Research Core, Drexel University School of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Exponent Inc, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gkiatas I, Karasavvidis T, Sharma AK, Xiang W, Malahias MA, Chalmers BP, Jerabek SA, Sculco PK. Use of elevated liners in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY 2021; 32:587-594. [PMID: 34050816 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03023-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Instability remains one of the most frequent complications requiring revision surgery after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Elevated liners are often utilized to reduce the risk of dislocation; however, the literature is inconclusive, with no systematic reviews summarizing the data. Thus, this systematic review aimed to establish a consensus for the efficacy of elevated liners in primary THA by determining rates of overall revision and revision specifically for recurrent dislocation. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible randomized-controlled trials and observational studies reporting on the use of elevated liners in primary total hip arthroplasty were identified through May 2020. A random effects model meta-analysis was conducted, and the I2 statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity. RESULTS Eight studies met inclusion criteria, and overall, 26,507 patients undergoing primary THA with use of an elevated liner were included. In aggregate, the most common cause of revision was recurrent hip dislocation (1.3%, N = 82/6,267) followed by joint infection (1.2%, N = 45/3,772) and acetabular loosening (0.3%, N = 10/3,772). Notably, elevated liners were associated with a lower risk of revision for recurrent dislocation compared to neutral liners (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55-1.00; p = 0.048). CONCLUSION This review found that after primary THA with the use of elevated liners, hip dislocation and prosthetic joint infection continued to be the most frequent reasons for revision surgery. However, elevated liners had a lower risk of revision for recurrent dislocation compared to neutral liners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Gkiatas
- Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| | - Theofilos Karasavvidis
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Abhinav K Sharma
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - William Xiang
- Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Michael-Alexander Malahias
- Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Brian P Chalmers
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Seth A Jerabek
- Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Peter K Sculco
- Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Emara AK, Peterson J, Piuzzi NS, Klika A, Rajaravivarma R, Higuera-Rueda C, Roy S. Effect of liner offset and inclination on cement retention strength of metal-in-metal acetabular constructs: A biomechanical study. J Orthop Res 2021; 39:813-820. [PMID: 32678920 DOI: 10.1002/jor.24807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Cementing metallic liners into well-fixed acetabular shells facilitates utilizing dual-mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty without shell replacement. The current biomechanical study investigated the effect of increasing cemented liner (a) inclination; and (b) offset on the cement retention strength measured as the lever-out moment at cement failure. Eighteen metallic liner prototypes were cemented into cluster-hole acetabular shells at variable inclinations (0°, 10°, and 20°) and offsets (0 and 10 mm) relative to the enclosing acetabular shell (6 groups; n = 3 constructs per group). The constructs were connected to a material testing frame, and lever-out failure moments were tested through an established protocol. Failure occurred at the liner-cement interface (18/18). There was no correlation between liner inclination and the lever-out failure moment (r = -0.327, P = .185). Liner offset demonstrated a strong negative correlation to mean lever-out failure moments (r = -0.788, P < .001). There was no significant difference between mean lever-out failure moments at variable liner inclinations, regardless of offset (P = .358). Greater liner offset was associated with diminished mean lever-out failure moments (P < .001). Compared with neutral (0° inclination, 0 mm offset), the maximum inclination and offset group had the lowest mean lever-out failure moment (P = .011). Cemented metal-in-metal constructs are significantly affected by the liner positioning. While a correlation between liner inclination and cement retention strength could not be asserted, cement retention strength is significantly diminished by increased liner offset.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed K Emara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jennifer Peterson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alison Klika
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - Shammodip Roy
- Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Corporation, Mahwah, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
High Offset Stems Are Protective of Dislocation in High-Risk Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36:210-216. [PMID: 32741711 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spinal stiffness has been shown to increase risk of dislocation due to impingement and instability. Increasing anteversion of the acetabular component has been suggested to prevent dislocation, but little has been discussed in terms of femoral or global offset restoration. The purpose of this study is to quantify dislocation rates after primary THA using standard versus high-offset femoral components and to determine how differences in offset affect impingement-free range of motion in a stiff spine cohort using a novel impingement model. METHODS A total of 12,365 patients undergoing THA from 2016 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed to determine dislocation rates and utilization of standard- versus high-offset stems. For 50 consecutive patients with spinal stiffness, a CT-based computer software impingement modeling system assessed bony or prosthetic impingement during simulated range of motion. The model was run 5 times for each patient with varying offsets. Range of motion was simulated in each scenario to determine the degree at which impingement occurred. RESULTS There were 51 dislocations for a 0.41% dislocation rate. Total utilization of high-offset stems in the entire cohort was 49%. Of those patients who sustained a dislocation, 49 (96%) utilized a standard-offset stem. The impingement modeling demonstrated 5 degrees of added range of motion until impingement for every 1 mm offset increase. CONCLUSION In the impingement model, high-offset stems facilitated greater ROM before bony impingement and resulted in lower dislocation rates. In the setting of high-risk THA due to spinal stiffness, surgeons should consider the use of high-offset stems and pay attention to offset restoration.
Collapse
|
22
|
Warschawski Y, Garceau SP, Joly DA, Kuzyk P, Gross A, Safir O. The Effect of Femoral Head Size, Neck Length, and Offset on Dislocation Rates of Constrained Acetabular Liners. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36:345-348. [PMID: 32826142 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Constrained acetabular liners (CALs) are used in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty in cases where stability and abductor deficiency are of concern. The efficacy of CALs has been shown to be design dependent. There is clear evidence that the use of small head sizes and shorter offset in unconstrained total hip arthroplasty is associated with higher rates of dislocation. To our knowledge, no such study has assessed the effect of femoral head size, neck length, and offset for CALs. METHODS We performed a retrospective study assessing the outcomes of CALs with minimum 2-year follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted for all patients and for patients revised for instability. A binomial regression analysis was performed to assess for variables significantly associated with CAL failure. RESULTS A total of 285 CALs in 281 patients were identified with a mean follow-up of 5.7 years. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were as follows: all indication 91.9% vs instability 85.5% (P = .15). Increasing neck length was associated with lower rates of failure (odds ratio, 0.81; P = .042). Femoral head size, offset, and abductor reconstruction were not significantly associated with CAL failure. CONCLUSION Larger head size has not been demonstrated to lead to lower failure in CALs. Increasing neck length was associated with lower failure rate. Surgeons should be cautious when attempting to ream to larger acetabular shell sizes for the purpose of using larger heads with CALs. Increasing neck length may instead be targeted intraoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaniv Warschawski
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Simon P Garceau
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Denis A Joly
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul Kuzyk
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Allan Gross
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Oleg Safir
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
D'Apolito R, Bandettini G, Jacquot FMP, Zagra L. Modular dual-mobility cups using ceramic liners: an original solution for selected indications? Hip Int 2020; 30:59-65. [PMID: 33267689 DOI: 10.1177/1120700020964976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dual mobility (DM) has been shown to improve stability both in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is increasingly used in patients at high risk of dislocation and in the treatment of THA instability. The introduction of modular liners has helped to overcome some of the limitations of monoblock DM cups. In this context, the use of a ceramic liner would avoid the conventional cobalt-chromium liner in the titanium shell, which can be problematic in some situations. The aim of this paper is to report the outcomes of a consecutive series of patients undergoing revision THA using a modular DM cup with a ceramic liner instead of the conventional metal one, and to clarify the rationale for this currently "off-label" use. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a retrospective series of patients who received this new DM bearing in a single institution. Patients were followed up clinically and radiologically at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and yearly thereafter. RESULTS 5 patients received the ceramic liner in the study period (2014-2019). The indications were instability or high risk of dislocation in ceramic liner fracture and ARMD with soft tissue damage after MoM THA. The mean age at surgery was 74 (63-82) years, the mean follow-up was 36 (12-72) months. No dislocation occurred, and no adverse events related to the implant were recorded. CONCLUSIONS The use of a ceramic liner in a modular DM cup offers several advantages in selected patients, and the results of our cohort are encouraging. However, caution is needed in introducing this new bearing because knowledge is currently limited. Further studies on a larger number of patients and with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings and before widespread use of the device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocco D'Apolito
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Hip Department, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Bandettini
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Hip Department, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Zagra
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Hip Department, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Klemt C, Smith EJ, Oganesyan R, Limmahakhun S, Fitz D, Kwon YM. Outcome of Dual Mobility Constructs for Adverse Local Tissue Reaction Associated Abductor Deficiency in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35:3686-3691. [PMID: 32654942 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) is challenging owing to high complications and poor outcomes after a revision surgery. As dislocation is the most common cause of reoperation, it is often necessary to use advanced articulations such as dual mobility. This study aims to evaluate the outcome and complication rates after revision surgery with dual mobility constructs, compared to constrained and conventional articulations in the setting of significant abductor deficiency due to ALTR. METHODS Out of a total of 338 revision total hip arthroplasties for ALTR, 234 patients with a significant tissue necrosis and abductor muscle insufficiency (grade 3) were evaluated. The complication rates after revisions were compared between 42 hips with dual mobility implants, 24 hips with constrained liners, 104 hips with large diameter heads (36-40 mm), and 64 hips with small diameter heads (≤32 mm). RESULTS After an average of 4 years of follow-up (2.8-8.6), the dual mobility articulation had no dislocation, compared to 4.1% and 15.5% for constrained liner and conventional articulations, respectively (P < .001). Utilization of dual mobility and constrained liner cup also did not increase the risk of nondislocation complications, including periprosthetic joint infection and periprosthetic fracture (P = .18 and .52). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates significantly lower dislocation rates for dual mobility when compared to conventional articulations and comparable to constrained liners in cases of severe abductor deficiency due to ALTR, suggesting that dual mobility implants are viable surgical treatment alternatives to constrained liners to minimize dislocation during revision total hip arthroplasty in the setting of significant abductor deficiency due to ALTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Klemt
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Evan J Smith
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ruben Oganesyan
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sakkadech Limmahakhun
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David Fitz
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Young-Min Kwon
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Khoshbin A, Haddad FS, Ward S, O hEireamhoin S, Wu J, Nherera L, Atrey A. A cost-effectiveness assessment of dual-mobility bearings in revision hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B:1128-1135. [PMID: 32862681 PMCID: PMC7468559 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.102b9.bjj-2019-1742.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Aims The rate of dislocation when traditional single bearing implants are used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to be between 8% and 10%. The use of dual mobility bearings can reduce this risk to between 0.5% and 2%. Dual mobility bearings are more expensive, and it is not clear if the additional clinical benefits constitute value for money for the payers. We aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dual mobility compared with single bearings for patients undergoing revision THA. Methods We developed a Markov model to estimate the expected cost and benefits of dual mobility compared with single bearing implants in patients undergoing revision THA. The rates of revision and further revision were calculated from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales, while rates of transition from one health state to another were estimated from the literature, and the data were stratified by sex and age. Implant and healthcare costs were estimated from local procurement prices and national tariffs. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated using published utility estimates for patients undergoing THA. Results At a minimum five-year follow-up, the use of dual mobility was cost-effective with an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of between £3,006 and £18,745/QALY for patients aged < 55 years and between 64 and 75 years, respectively. For those aged > 75 years dual mobility was only cost-effective if the timeline was beyond seven years. The use of dual mobility bearings was cost-saving for patients aged < 75 years and cost-effective for those aged > 75 years if the time horizon was beyond ten years. Conclusion The use of dual mobility bearings is cost-effective compared with single bearings in patients undergoing revision THA. The younger the patient is, the more likely it is that a dual mobility bearing can be more cost-effective and even cost-saving. The results are affected by the time horizon and cost of bearings for those aged > 75 years. For patients aged > 75 years, the surgeon must decide whether the use of a dual mobility bearing is a viable economic and clinical option. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(9):1128–1135.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Khoshbin
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Fares S Haddad
- University College London Hospitals, The Princess Grace Hospital, and The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH, London, UK
| | - Sarah Ward
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - James Wu
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Amit Atrey
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Vigdorchik JM, Sharma AK, Madurawe CS, Elbuluk AM, Baré JV, Pierrepont JW. Does Prosthetic or Bony Impingement Occur More Often in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Dynamic Preoperative Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35:2501-2506. [PMID: 32507449 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Impingement is a leading cause for instability resulting in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Impingement can be prosthetic, bony, or soft tissue. The purpose of this study is to investigate, using a virtual simulation, whether bony or prosthetic impingement presents first in well-positioned THAs. METHODS Twenty-three patients requiring THA were planned for a ceramic-on-poly cementless construct using dynamic planning software. Cups were orientated at 45° inclination and 25° anteversion when standing. Femoral components and neck lengths were positioned to reproduce native anteversion and match contralateral leg length and offset. The type and location of impingement was then recorded with recreation of anterior and posterior impingement during standard and extreme ranges of motion (ROM). RESULTS In standard ROM, flexion produced both prosthetic and bony impingement and extension resulted in prosthetic impingement in models with lipped liners. In extreme ROM, anterior impingement was 78% bony in 32-mm articulations, and 88% bony in 36-mm articulations. Posterior impingement was 65% prosthetic in 32-mm articulations, and 55% prosthetic in 36-mm articulations. Dual mobility cups showed the greatest risk of posterior prosthetic impingement in hyperextension (74%). CONCLUSION In standard ROM, both bony and prosthetic impingement occurred in flexion, while prosthetic impingement occurred in extension in models with lipped liners. In hyperextension, prosthetic impingement was more common than bony impingement, and was exclusively the cause of impingement when a lip was used. In flexion, impingement was primarily bony with the use of a 36-mm head. The risk of posterior prosthetic impingement was greatest with dual mobility cups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M Vigdorchik
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, New York, NY
| | - Abhinav K Sharma
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, New York, NY
| | | | - Ameer M Elbuluk
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement Service, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Van Eecke E, Vanbiervliet J, Dauwe J, Mulier M. Comparison of Constrained Acetabular Components and Dual Mobility Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Literature Review. Hip Pelvis 2020; 32:59-69. [PMID: 32566536 PMCID: PMC7295616 DOI: 10.5371/hp.2020.32.2.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Recurrent instability remains a common cause of failure after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Dual mobility (DM) cups and designs with constrained acetabular liners (CAL) have both been developed to help overcome this challenge. The aim of this report is to compare safety and efficacy outcomes of both designs based on the literature. A comprehensive literature review including published evidence on the results of DM and CAL in revision THA was performed and summarized. Available literature focusing on overall survival, dislocation, loosening, intra-prosthetic dislocation (IPD), and functional outcomes were analysed. Forty-six reports including an evaluation of 5,617 total hips were evaluated were included in the review. The included studies were divided into two distinct groups based on implantation approach: i) CAL (n=15) and ii) DM (n=31). The DM group had higher overall survival rates (94.7% vs. 81.0%), lower dislocation rates (2.6% vs. 11.0%), and lower acetabular loosening rates (1.0% vs. 2.0%) compared to the CAL group. IPDs were reported in 6 studies (mean rate, 0.6%). No differences in functional outcomes were identified due to incomplete reports. Our observations reveal that designs with CAL have poorer outcomes as compared to DM cups in revision THA. Currently, the use of DM seems more appropriate since they offer lower rates of dislocations, loosening and re-revisions in the short- and mid-term. Concerns regarding the potential of increased wear in a younger, high-demand population require additional data and evaluation by long-term studies for the DM design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Van Eecke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jens Vanbiervliet
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Dauwe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michiel Mulier
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gibbs VN, McCulloch RA, Dhiman P, McGill A, Taylor AH, Palmer AJR, Kendrick BJL. Modifiable risk factors for mortality in revision total hip arthroplasty for periprosthetic fracture. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B:580-585. [PMID: 32349604 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.102b5.bjj-2019-1673.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to identify modifiable risk factors associated with mortality in patients requiring revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for periprosthetic hip fracture. METHODS The electronic records of consecutive patients undergoing revision THA for periprosthetic hip fracture between December 2011 and October 2018 were reviewed. The data which were collected included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, the preoperative serum level of haemoglobin, time to surgery, operating time, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and postoperative surgical and medical complications. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine independent modifiable factors associated with mortality at 90 days and one year postoperatively. RESULTS A total of 203 patients were identified. Their mean age was 78 years (44 to 100), and 108 (53%) were female. The median time to surgery was three days (interquartile range (IQR) 2 to 5). The mortality rate at one year was 13.8% (n = 28). The commonest surgical complication was dislocation (n = 22, 10.8%) and the commonest medical complication within 90 days of surgery was hospital-acquired pneumonia (n = 25, 12%). Multivariate analysis showed that the rate of mortality one year postoperatively was five-fold higher in patients who sustained a dislocation (odds ratio (OR) 5.03 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60 to 15.83); p = 0.006). The rate of mortality was also four-fold higher in patients who developed hospital-acquired pneumonia within 90 days postoperatively (OR 4.43 (95% CI 1.55 to 12.67); p = 0.005). There was no evidence that the time to surgery was a risk factor for death at one year. CONCLUSION Dislocation and hospital-acquired pneumonia following revision THA for a periprosthetic fracture are potentially modifiable risk factors for mortality. This study suggests that surgeons should consider increasing constraint to reduce the risk of dislocation, and the early involvement of a multidisciplinary team to reduce the risk of hospital-acquired pneumonia. We found no evidence that the time to surgery affected mortality, which may allow time for medical optimization, surgical planning, and resource allocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(5):580-585.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria N Gibbs
- The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Robert A McCulloch
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Paula Dhiman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew McGill
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Adrian H Taylor
- The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Antony J R Palmer
- The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Ben J L Kendrick
- The Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, UK.,Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Karvonen M, Laaksonen I, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Haapakoski J, Puhto AP, Kettunen J, Manninen M, Mäkelä KT. Implant Survival of Constrained Acetabular Device in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Based on Data From the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 2020; 35:219-223. [PMID: 31526699 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Constrained acetabular devices were developed to prevent dislocations after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the data on their success have been contradictory. In this study, we aimed to assess implant survival of the constrained acetabular device in primary THA based on the Finnish Arthroplasty Register data. METHODS A total of 373 primary THAs with constrained acetabular devices inserted from 2006 to 2017 were included. A reference group was formed on a 1:3 basis and matched for age, sex, and diagnosis, consisting of 1118 conventional THAs. Implant survival estimates using death as a competing risk were assessed with revision for any reason and for any aseptic reason as the endpoints. The Cox multiple regression models were adjusted for age, sex, and diagnosis. The mean follow-up time was 3.3 (0-12.4) years for the constrained device group and 3.8 (0-12.0) years for the reference group. RESULTS Overall, there were 21 revisions in the constrained device group and 49 in the reference group. The 8-year survivorship for any reason was 94% (confidence interval [CI]: 91-96) for the constrained device group and 93% (CI: 89-97) for the reference group. With revision for any aseptic reason as the endpoint, the 8-year survivorships were 97% (CI: 95-99) and 94% (CI: 90-98), respectively. During the first 1.5 years, the constrained acetabular device group had a similar revision risk (hazard ratio: 1.09 [CI: 0.57-2.07], P = .8) to that of the reference group. CONCLUSION The constrained acetabular device had good survival in primary THA, and our results support its continued use even in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikko Karvonen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Inari Laaksonen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Pekka Pulkkinen
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | - Ari-Pekka Puhto
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Jukka Kettunen
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Keijo T Mäkelä
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abe T, Kaku N, Tabata T, Tagomori H, Tsumura H. Long-term clinical results of bipolar hemiarthroplasty for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis of the hip: A retrospective study. J Orthop 2020; 17:120-123. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
31
|
Acetabular Erosion After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Proximal Femoral Replacement for Malignant Bone Tumors. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:2692-2697. [PMID: 31279599 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Revised: 05/22/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemiarthroplasty megaprosthetic proximal femur reconstruction after tumor resection is a widespread procedure in orthopedic oncology. One potential complication is acetabular wear requiring secondary acetabular revision. The study's purpose is to investigate prevalence of acetabular erosion, secondary revisions, and potential risk factors. METHODS We retrospectively identified 112 patients who underwent proximal femur replacement after resection of a malignant bone tumor and had radiological follow-up longer than 12 months. Patient demographic, surgical, and oncologic factors were recorded, acetabular wear was measured using the classification proposed by Baker, and prosthetic failure was classified using the International Society on Limb Salvage classification. Functional assessment was performed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score and Harris Hip Score. RESULTS Prevalence of acetabular wear was 28.6%. Secondary conversion to total hip arthroplasty was required in 5 patients (4.6%), all treated for primary bone tumors. No patient treated for metastatic tumor had higher grade acetabular wear or required revision. Significant risk factors for the development of acetabular wear were age under 40 (P = .035) and longer follow-up (63 vs 43 months, P = .004). Other patient, surgical, or adjuvant treatment-related factors were not associated with acetabular revision or acetabular wear. The dislocation rate in the patient cohort was 0.9%. CONCLUSION Bipolar hemiarthroplasty proximal femoral replacement represents a durable reconstruction after tumor resection. Hip instability is rare. Acetabular erosion is rare and can be successfully treated with conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Young patients with long-term survival over 10 years are at risk. In reconstruction for metastases, instability and acetabular wear are rare.
Collapse
|
32
|
Huang RC, Malkani AL, Harwin SF, Hozack WJ, Mont MA, Higuera-Rueda CA, Westrich GH. Multicenter Evaluation of a Modular Dual Mobility Construct for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34:S287-S291. [PMID: 31005430 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2018] [Revised: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) constructs in total hip arthroplasty (THA) offer increased hip stability compared with constrained liners, without compromising hip range of motion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of revision THA using MDM. METHODS The study was a multiinstitutional retrospective cohort study of 315 hips that underwent revision THA using MDM between 2011 and 2017. Clinical outcomes and reasons for failure were collected. RESULTS Three hundred fifteen patients met 1-year minimum follow-up (mean 3.3 years). Nine hips had instability postoperatively (2.9%), and 30 hips required reoperation (9.5%). Seven had recurrent instability (6.5%) which was associated with liner-only exchange (P = .021) and liner outer diameter of ≤ 38 mm (P = .016). CONCLUSION Revision THA with MDM provided a low rate of instability and reoperation in a revision cohort. Recurrent instability following use of MDM in revision THA was associated with retention of the acetabular component and polyethylene outer diameter ≤ 38 mm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald C Huang
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, New York, NY; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, BronxCare Health Systems, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Steven F Harwin
- Department of Orthopedics, Mt. Sinai West Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Michael A Mont
- Department of Orthopedics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill at Northwell, New York, NY
| | | | - Geoffrey H Westrich
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gabor JA, Feng JE, Gupta S, Calkins TE, Della Valle CJ, Vigdorchik J, Schwarzkopf R. Cementation of a monoblock dual mobility bearing in a newly implanted porous revision acetabular component in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 2019; 5:341-347. [PMID: 31516979 PMCID: PMC6728441 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The most common indications for revision total hip arthroplasty are instability/dislocation and mechanical loosening. Efforts to address this have included the use of dual mobility (DM) articulations. The aim of this study is to report on the use of cemented DM cups in complex acetabular revision total hip arthroplasty cases with a high risk of recurrent instability. Methods A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted. Patients who received a novel acetabular construct consisting of a monoblock DM cup cemented into a fully porous metal shell were included. Outcome data included 90-day complications and readmissions, revision for any reason, and Harris Hip Scores. Results Thirty-eight hips in 38 patients were included for this study. At a median follow-up of 215.5 days (range 6-783), the Harris Hip Score improved from a mean of 50 ± 12.2 to 78 ± 11.2 (P < .001). One (2.6%) patient experienced a dislocation on postoperative day 1, and was closed reduced with no further complications. There was 1 (2.6%) reoperation for periprosthetic joint infection treated with a 2-stage exchange. Conclusions In this complex series of patients, cementation of a monoblock DM cup into a newly implanted fully porous revision shell reliably provided solid fixation with a low risk of dislocation at short-term follow-up. Although longer term follow-up is needed, utilization of this novel construct should be considered in patients at high risk for instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan A Gabor
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - James E Feng
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shashank Gupta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tyler E Calkins
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Craig J Della Valle
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jonathan Vigdorchik
- Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ran Schwarzkopf
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
El-Husseiny M, Masri B, Duncan C, Garbuz DS. Long-term results of tripolar constrained total hip arthroplasty in revision hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B:123-126. [DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.101b6.bjj-2018-1484.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Aims We investigated the long-term performance of the Tripolar Trident acetabular component used for recurrent dislocation in revision total hip arthroplasty. We assessed: 1) rate of re-dislocation; 2) incidence of complications requiring re-operation; and 3) Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) pain and functional scores. Patients and Methods We retrospectively identified 111 patients who had 113 revision tripolar constrained liners between 1994 and 2008. All patients had undergone revision hip arthroplasty before the constrained liner was used: 13 after the first revision, 17 after the second, 38 after the third, and 45 after more than three revisions. A total of 75 hips (73 patients) were treated with Tripolar liners due to recurrent instability with abductor deficiency, In addition, six patients had associated cerebral palsy, four had poliomyelitis, two had multiple sclerosis, two had spina bifida, two had spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia, one had previous reversal of an arthrodesis, and 21 had proximal femoral replacements. The mean age of patients at time of Tripolar insertions was 72 years (53 to 89); there were 69 female patients (two bilateral) and 42 male patients. All patients were followed up for a mean of 15 years (10 to 24). Overall, 55 patients (57 hips) died between April 2011 and February 2018, at a mean of 167 months (122 to 217) following their tripolar liner implantation. We extracted demographics, implant data, rate of dislocations, and incidence of other complications. Results At ten years, the Kaplan–Meier survivorship for dislocation was 95.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 90 to 98), with 101 patients at risk. At 20 years, the survivorship for dislocation was 90.6% (95% CI 81.0 to 95.5), with one patient at risk. Eight patients (7.2%) had a dislocation of their constrained liners. At ten years, the survival to any event was 89.4% (95% CI 82 to 93.8), with 96 patients at risk. At 20 years, the survival to any event was 82.5% (95% CI 71.9 to 89.3), with one patient at risk. Five hips (4.4%) had deep infection. Two patients (1.8%) developed dissociated constraining rings with pain but without dislocation, which required re-operation. Two patients (1.8%) had periprosthetic femoral fractures, without dislocation, that were treated by revision stems along with exchange of the well-functioning constrained liners. Conclusion Constrained tripolar liners used at revision hip arthroplasty provided favourable results in the long term for treatment of recurrent dislocation and for patients at high risk of dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):123–126.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. El-Husseiny
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - B. Masri
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - C. Duncan
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - D. S. Garbuz
- Division of Lower Limb Reconstruction and Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Levin JM, Sultan AA, O'Donnell JA, Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Piuzzi NS, Mont MA. Modern Dual-Mobility Cups in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:3793-3800. [PMID: 30195654 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this systematic review is to analyze the outcomes of dual-mobility (DM) cups in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Specifically, we evaluated the following: (1) all-cause and aseptic survivorship rates; (2) dislocation rates; (3) complications; and (4) clinical outcomes reported using validated health status measures. METHODS A comprehensive literature search included studies that reported the following: (1) re-revision rates, (2) complications, and (3) clinical outcomes following DM use in revision THA. The following exclusion criteria were used: (1) studies that did not stratify their analysis between primary and revision THA, (2) studies that utilized off-label techniques, (3) review articles, (4) case studies, (5) basic science articles, (6) non-English language reports, and (6) reports on patients who underwent surgery before 2010, in order to reflect modern DM implants use and technology. A total of 9 studies were included in our final analysis. RESULTS Aseptic and all-cause survivorship rates were 97.7% and 94.5%. Prevalence of dislocation was 2.2%, and 0.3% for intraprosthetic dislocation. Meta-analysis comparing DM to fixed-bearing prostheses demonstrated a significantly lower odds of dislocation in the DM cohort (odds ratio 0.24, P = .002). Complications occurred in 7.4% of revision THAs with DM cups, while infection rates totaled to 3.3% of cases. Studies comparing outcomes using Harris Hip Scores did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in improved postoperative scores (P > .05). CONCLUSION DM cups have demonstrated excellent survivorship, low dislocation, and overall complication rates. Therefore, it can be considered a safe and effective option, particularly in the high-risk patients who undergo revision THA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay M Levin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Assem A Sultan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Nipun Sodhi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Anton Khlopas
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Michael A Mont
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Jones CW, Malahias MA, Baral E, Wright T, Sculco TP, Sculco PK. Catastrophic failure of tripolar constrained liners due to backside wear: a novel failure mode. Arthroplast Today 2018; 4:270-274. [PMID: 30186903 PMCID: PMC6123236 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Constrained acetabular liners have been developed for patients who are at high risk for dislocation or who are undergoing revision surgery for recurrent dislocations. We report on 2 cases of failure of tripolar constrained liners due to severe backside polyethylene wear after dissociation of the outer polyethylene liner without dislocation, a mode of failure not previously reported. The backside of the inserts suffered severe polyethylene deformation, wear, and scratching due to dissociation from the locking mechanism. In patients with tripolar constrained liners, radiographic evidence of eccentric wear should be considered as possible occult dissociation of the polyethylene liner within the shell. Conversion to a modular dual mobility liner appears to be a viable solution in this setting.
Collapse
|
37
|
Romagnoli M, Grassi A, Costa GG, Lazaro LE, Lo Presti M, Zaffagnini S. The efficacy of dual-mobility cup in preventing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2018; 43:1071-1082. [PMID: 30032356 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4062-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although long-term reports of total hip arthroplasty (THA) showed successful results, instability remains a major complication. Recently, dual-mobility cups (DMC) have gained more and more interest among clinicians, with encouraging results in terms of lower rate of dislocation associated with good clinical results, but a lack of evidence exists regarding the real efficacy of this implant design compared to traditional fixed-bearing total hip arthroplasties. METHODS A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Google scholar, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE by two independent reviewers for comparative studies available till December 2017, with the primary objective to demonstrate a real lower dislocation rate of DMC implants compared to unipolar fixed-bearing cup designs. A meta-analysis was conducted with the collected pooled data about dislocation rate, calculating the risk difference (RD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% CI for dichotomous variables. Heterogeneity was tested using the χ2 and Higgins' I2 tests. A fixed-effect model was used because the statistical heterogeneity was below 50%. RESULTS After performing a critical exclusion process, the number of eligible studies included for final synthesis considered was 15, describing the results of a total of 2408 total hip arthroplasties (50.6% with a dual-mobility acetabular cup design, 49.4% with a standard fixed-bearing design). The fixed-effect meta-analysis showed a slight significant risk ratio of 0.16 (95% CI, 0.09, 0.28; I2 = 0%, p < 0.00001); a statistically significant difference in favor of the DMC group was maintained also considering only primary or revision arthroplasties, traumatic fractures or elective patients with diagnosis of osteoarthritis, avascular osteonecrosis or rheumatic arthritis. CONCLUSIONS With the intrinsic limitations of our study design and based on the current available data, this study demonstrates that dual-mobility acetabular components decrease the risk of post-operative instability also in high-risk patients, both in primary and revision hip arthroplasties. However, new high-quality studies, possibly with a randomized control design, should be undertaken in order to strengthen the present data. STUDY DESIGN Level of Evidence III, therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Romagnoli
- II Orthopaedic Clinic and Biomechanics Laboratory, IRCSS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano n. 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Grassi
- II Orthopaedic Clinic and Biomechanics Laboratory, IRCSS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano n. 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Gianluca Costa
- II Orthopaedic Clinic and Biomechanics Laboratory, IRCSS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano n. 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Lionel E Lazaro
- Hospital for Special Surgery and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Mirco Lo Presti
- II Orthopaedic Clinic and Biomechanics Laboratory, IRCSS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano n. 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Zaffagnini
- II Orthopaedic Clinic and Biomechanics Laboratory, IRCSS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano n. 1/10, 40136, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Del Balso C, Teeter MG, Tan SC, Lanting BA, Howard JL. Does the Additional Articulation in Retrieved Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Implants Decrease Trunnionosis Compared to Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2018; 33:268-272. [PMID: 29033155 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2017] [Revised: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trunnionosis at the modular head-neck taper interface in metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty (MoP THA) has been shown to occur, and represents a potential mode of MoP THA failure. The purpose of the present investigation is to elucidate differences in fretting and corrosion at the head-neck taper interface of prostheses retrieved from bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BH) and MoP THA. METHODS A retrieval analysis of BH and MoP THA prostheses featuring a single taper design from a single manufacturer and in vivo for a minimum 2 years was performed. Fifteen femoral heads of 28-mm diameter and corresponding femoral stems retrieved from BH were compared with MoP THA implants matched based on time in vivo and head length (28 mm, -3 mm to 28 mm, +8 mm). Fretting and corrosion damage scoring was completed under stereomicroscopic visualization. RESULTS Femoral head bore tapers retrieved from BH exhibited decreased overall fretting (P = .02), when compared to those retrieved from MoP THA. Total corrosion scores for all retrieved implants were positively correlated with implantation time (ρ = 0.54, P < .02). CONCLUSION Femoral heads retrieved from BH exhibit decreased fretting damage compared to those retrieved from MoP THA. The added articulation in BH implants may decrease torque produced at the head-neck taper junction, thereby decreasing fretting. Increased fretting damage in implants from MoP THA is not associated with increased corrosion in 28-mm heads of this taper design. The longer a BH or MoP THA prosthesis is implanted, the greater the risk of damage due to corrosion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Del Balso
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew G Teeter
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Surgical Innovation Program, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sok C Tan
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brent A Lanting
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - James L Howard
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zagra L, Caboni E. Total hip arthroplasty instability treatment without dual mobility cups: brief overview and experience of other options. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2017; 41:661-668. [DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3383-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|