Exposing the glenoid in shoulder arthroplasty

The Role of Arthroscopy in Contemporary Glenoid Fossa Fracture Fixation

Glenoid fossa fractures are rare injuries accounting for 10 to 29% of all intra-articular scapula fractures. They are usually the result of high-energy trauma, and concomitant injuries are not uncommon. Patients with glenoid fractures are admitted with shoulder pain and restricted range of motion. Although shoulder plain radiographs could establish the diagnosis, a computed tomography scan is necessary to adequately define the fracture pattern and characteristics. The most commonly used classification system is that of Ideberg (modified by Goss), which includes five glenoid fossa fracture types according to the location, extension, and complexity of the lesion. Articular surface displacement and step-off are the most important factors that should be taken under consideration when deciding for conservative or surgical management. Operative treatment includes open reduction and internal fixation through a posterior or anterior approach depending on fracture morphology and displacement. However, open surgical techniques are related to extensive soft-tissue disruption, risk of neurovascular injury, and inadequate exposure of the entire glenoid cavity. Introduction of arthroscopy could facilitate better visualization of the glenoid articular surface and improved fracture reduction. However, it is a technically demanding procedure with many challenges and pitfalls. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence regarding the treatment of glenoid fossa fractures and present the beneficial effect of arthroscopy in improving the quality of fracture fixation and overall functional outcomes.

Functional internal rotation is similar between lesser tuberosity osteotomy and subscapularis peel in total shoulder arthroplasty: short-term follow-up

INTRODUCTION

Lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) and subscapularis peel (Peel) are 2 common techniques used to mobilize the subscapularis tendon during anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The literature is inconclusive over which technique is optimal; thus, controversy exists over which technique should be performed. The purpose of this study was to compare specific functional internal rotation tasks and general outcome scores in TSA patients who received either an LTO or Peel.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 563 patients treated with primary TSA using either an LTO (n = 358) or Peel (n = 205) with a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. Subjective internal rotation, active internal rotation, and specific questions related to functional internal rotation isolated from the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons functional questionnaires were reviewed. Other outcome scores including visual analog scale pain and function, Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation, SST, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and revision rates were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

The study found no difference in postoperative functional internal rotation and range of motion between LTO and Peel. Patients who received a Peel were shown to have a slightly greater improvement in the ability to perform toileting and a higher average change in SST score that did not reach clinical significance. There was no difference in the percentage of maximal improvement, revision rate, or need for revision between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

No difference was found between the LTO and Peel techniques in regard to functional tasks of internal rotation at short-term follow-up.

Glenoid Component Position Does Not Affect Short-Term Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Background: Malpositioning of the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) remains the primary source of loosening. The purpose of this study is firstly, to quantify postoperative glenoid component position in patients having a TSA and secondly, to explore whether glenoid component radiolucency is associated with glenoid position, clinical outcomes and patient-reported measures in the short-term (two year) follow-up period. Methods: This study was a sub-study of a larger clinical trial that included patients who underwent a TSA and who were randomized into two different glenoid types with a minimum two-year follow-up period. Post-operative radiographic assessments (six weeks and two years) were used to measure glenoid component position (version, inclination, offset) and humeral head centering anterior–posterior (AP) and superior–inferior (SI), and to assess glenoid component radiolucent scoring (modified Lazarus). Pre-operative X-rays were used to measure glenoid version, inclination and Walch classification. Patient-reported measures (PROMs) included the EQ-5D health slider and the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis (WOOS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and were captured at baseline and two years postoperative. Clinical outcomes including range of motion and complications were also documented. Statistical analysis included t-tests and regression modeling. Results: Ninety-one patients with an average age of 69.9 ± 6.2 years were included in this study. Glenoid component position improved significantly in version (−19.4 ± 8.6° to −17.7 ± 8.5°; p < 0.045) and inclination (11.5 ± 7.1° to 5.9 ± 6.3°; p < 0.00001) from preoperative to six weeks postoperative. Glenoid component offset in SI and humeral head centering in AP remained unchanged throughout the follow-up. Radiolucency (Lazarus classification) was recorded in 21 cases (17.3%) with a Lazarus score of 1 (15 cases) and 2 (6 cases). The EQ-5D health slider, WOOS and ASES, and ROM confirmed continuous improvements from the preoperative scores to the two-year follow-up (p < 0.05). Regression models showed no correlation between glenoid component radiolucency at two years and the postoperative week six glenoid component position; however, female gender was a significant variable. Conclusion: Glenoid component changes from its original native glenoid were observed following TSA. Glenoid inclination was improved more than version from baseline, and the humeral head remained well-centered in AP and SI at two years. Radiolucency of the glenoid at two years is not negatively associated with PROMs or component position; however, female gender was identified as a significant predictor and warrants further investigation. Complications are not associated with glenoid position or radiolucency, but longer-term follow-up is required.

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Technique, Decision-Making and Exposure Tips

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The goal of this review is to introduce surgical decision-making pearls for reverse shoulder arthroplasty and describe optimization of surgical exposure for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

RECENT FINDINGS

While the technology of reverse shoulder replacement and the associated prosthetic options have expanded, the principles involved in successfully exposing the humerus and glenoid in arthroplasty remain the same. Reverse shoulder replacement should be considered in arthroplasty situations with rotator cuff disease, deformity, bone loss, and instability as part of the diagnosis. Optimal exposure in reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be obtained by (1) releasing deltoid adhesions, (2) removal of humeral osteophytes, (3) generous humeral head cuts, (4) thorough humeral and glenoid capsular release and (5) optimal glenoid retractor placement. Neuromuscular paralysis can also aid glenoid exposure.