Advances in tumour endoprostheses: a systematic review

A novel non-invasive electromagnetic extendable intercalary endoprosthesis: a proof-of-concept study

Introduction: Femur and tibia are the most commonly affected sites for primary malignant bone tumors in children. The wide resection of the tumor frequently requires the physis to be resected. The normal growth of the unaffected limb will result in a significant limb length discrepancy at skeletal maturity. To compensate for this resulting LLD, different generations of extendible endoprostheses have been developed. Non-invasive extendable prostheses eliminate the need for surgical procedures and general anesthesia, enabling gradual and painless lengthening. Currently available non-invasive extendable prostheses focus on joint reconstruction, and no case series analysis of intercalary non-invasive extendable prosthesis has been reported. Therefore, we have designed a novel non-invasive electromagnetic extendable intercalary endoprosthesis. Methods: In vitro mechanical experiments and in vivo animal experiments were conducted. Results: In vitro experiments have confirmed that the prosthetics can extend at a constant rate, increasing by 4.4 mm every 10 min. The average maximum extension force during prosthetic elongation can reach 1306N. In animal in vivo experiments, the extension process is smooth and non-invasive, and the sheep is in a comfortable state. Discussion: The in vitro and in vivo animal studies provide evidence to support the extension reliability, laying the foundation for future large-scale validation experiments.

Limited Revision with a Newly Designed Hinge Device for the Treatment of Mega-Prosthesis Hinge Failure: Two Case Reports

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment for hinge failure in mega-prosthesis continues to be a challenge. This study introduces a new method for treating hinge failure by using a unilateral prosthesis and hinge revision.

CASE PRESENTATION

We here present two patients who underwent mega-prosthesis reconstruction after resection of osteosarcoma in the distal femur. To address the issue of knee hyperextension after mega-prosthesis reconstruction, one patient underwent three revision surgeries, two surgeries were performed using the original hinge, and one surgery involved a newly designed hinge. To resolve the problem of dislocation, one patient underwent three revisions, with the first two revisions not involving hinge replacement and the third revision involving a newly designed hinge. Two replacements of unilateral prosthesis and hinge renovations were successful.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral prosthesis and newly designed hinge device revision are effective in treating the failure of old-fashioned mega-prosthesis hinges.

Expandable endoprostheses in skeletally immature patients: Where we are

Approximately 45 percent of malignant bone tumors are seen under the age of 16 and one of the important results of growth plate sacrification in patients with immature skeletons is limb inequality. Until the early 1990s, the treatment options for these patients were rotationplasty or amputation. Multimodal approaches that combine imaging, chemotherapy, and surgical techniques have enabled the development of limb-preserving methods with satisfactory results. In order to overcome inequality problems, expandable prostheses have been developed in the 1980s. Extendable endoprosthesis replacements have been improved over the years and are now an established and safe alternative. Noninvasive prostheses appear to be advantageous compared to minimally invasive expandable prostheses that require multiple surgical procedures, but the complication rate remains high. Therefore, although expandable prostheses are not the definitive answer to the treatment of bone sarcomas in skeletally immature children, they are still a suitable interim choice until full adulthood is achieved. Due to reported high complication rates, the procedures require significant experience and are recommended for use only in specialized cancer centers.

Surgical Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Hip and Knee Megaprostheses

Periprosthetic joint infection is a feared complication after the megaprosthetic reconstruction of oncologic and non-oncologic bone defects of including the knee or hip joint. Due to the relative rarity of these procedures, however, optimal management is debatable. Considering the expanding use of megaprostheses in revision arthroplasty and the high revision burden in orthopedic oncology, the risk of PJI is likely to increase over the coming years. In this non-systematic review article, we present and discuss current management options and the associated results focusing on studies from the last 15 years and studies from dedicated centers or study groups. The indication, surgical details and results in controlling infection are presented for debridement, antibiotics, irrigation and retention (DAIR) procedure with an exchange of the modular components, single-stage implant exchange, two-stage exchanges and ablative procedures.

Tandem Reconstruction of the Femoral Diaphysis Using an Intercalary Prosthesis and a Fibular Free Flap

BACKGROUND

Femoral diaphyseal reconstructions with metal prostheses have mediocre results because of high mechanical forces that result in eventual implant failure. Biological alternatives require prolonged restrictions on weight-bearing and have high rates of infection, nonunion, and fracture. A novel method of utilizing a vascularized fibula in combination with an intercalary prosthesis was developed to complement the immediate stability of the prosthesis with the long-term biological fixation of a vascularized fibular graft.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent reconstruction of an oncological intercalary femoral defect using an intercalary prosthesis and an inline fibular free flap (FFF). They were compared with patients who underwent femoral reconstruction using an intercalary allograft and an FFF.

RESULTS

Femoral reconstruction with an intercalary metal prosthesis and an FFF was performed in 8 patients, and reconstruction with an allograft and an FFF was performed in 16 patients. The mean follow-up was 5.3 years and 8.5 years, respectively (p = 0.02). In the bioprosthetic group, radiographic union of the fibula occurred in 7 (88%) of 8 patients, whereas in the allograft group, 13 (81%) of 16 patients had allograft union (p = 1.00) and all 16 patients had fibular union (p = 0.33). The mean time to fibular union in the bioprosthetic group was 9.0 months, whereas in the allograft group, the mean time to allograft union was 15.3 months (p = 0.03) and the mean time to fibular union was 12.5 months (p = 0.42). Unrestricted weight-bearing occurred at a mean of 3.7 months in the prosthesis group and 16.5 months in the allograft group (p < 0.01). Complications were observed in 2 (25%) of 8 patients in the prosthesis group and in 13 (81%) of 16 patients in the allograft group (p = 0.02). Neither chemotherapy nor radiation affected fibular or allograft union rates. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores did not differ significantly between the groups (mean, 26 versus 28; p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Bioprosthetic intercalary femoral reconstruction with a metal prosthesis and an FFF resulted in earlier weight-bearing, a shorter time to union, fewer operations needed for union, and lower complication rates than reconstruction with an allograft and an FFF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complications after limb salvage surgeries for musculoskeletal malignancies: 10-year experience of the main sarcoma center in Bulgaria

INTRODUCTION

Limb salvage surgery is currently the most frequently used treatment option in Bulgaria for individuals with musculoskeletal malignancies. Clinical data about complications from these procedures is limited in the country, with only a few studies currently available.

Complications and Outcome of Bone Sarcoma Patients with Limb Salvage using Liquid Nitrogen-treated Bone for Reconstruction

Introduction

The recommended treatment method for bone sarcoma is wide local excision and reconstruction to preserve limb function. Established methods of reconstruction are mega prosthesis or biological reconstruction. This study aimed to determine the complications and functional outcomes associated with limb salvage surgery using liquid nitrogen-treated bone.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively observed the short-term outcome of limb salvage surgeries where liquid nitrogen bone was used for reconstruction. A total of 15 patients underwent reconstruction with liquid nitrogen auto graft from January 2018 to December 2020. We used the free freezing method of liquid nitrogen treatment after wide local excision of sarcoma. We observed short-term outcomes after liquid nitrogen-treated bone reconstruction in limb salvage surgery. Survival of the auto grafts was recorded using the Kaplan-Meier method with a 95% confidence interval.

Results

The mean follow-up was 19.83 ± 4.5 months. The mean musculoskeletal tumor society score was 62.4 ± 7.9%, while the average Toronto extremity score was 59.6 ± 5.7%. Three patients died during the study duration due to visceral metastasis. Skin necrosis and wound breakdown were major complications in 9 (60%) patients. Deep infection was observed in 4 (26.7%). Similarly, 4 (26.7%) patients had non-union at either the proximal or distal osteotomy site, while the average time of bone union in the rest of the patients was 6.3 ± 1.7 months. A total of 6 (40%) patients underwent reoperation after liquid nitrogen treatment, either due to infection or non-union at the osteotomy site. Recurrence was observed in 3 (20%) of patients.

Conclusion

We observed a high complication rate with liquid nitrogen-treated autograft reconstruction. Vascularized fibula with liquid nitrogen-treated autograft or endoprosthesis should be encouraged.

A review of the development of histotripsy for extremity tumor ablation with a canine comparative oncology model to inform human treatments

Cancer is a devasting disease resulting in millions of deaths worldwide in both humans and companion animals, including dogs. Treatment of cancer is complex and challenging and therefore often multifaceted, as in the case of osteosarcoma (OS) and soft tissue sarcoma (STS). OS predominantly involves the appendicular skeleton and STS commonly develops in the extremities, resulting in treatment challenges due to the need to balance wide-margin resections to achieve local oncological control against the functional outcomes for the patient. To achieve wide tumor resection, invasive limb salvage surgery is often required, and the patient is at risk for numerous complications which can ultimately lead to impaired limb function and mobility. The advent of tumor ablation techniques offers the exciting potential of developing noninvasive or minimally invasive treatment options for extremity tumors. One promising innovative tumor ablation technique with strong potential to serve as a noninvasive limb salvage treatment for extremity tumor patients is histotripsy. Histotripsy is a novel, noninvasive, non-thermal, and non-ionizing focused ultrasound technique which uses controlled acoustic cavitation to mechanically disintegrate tissue with high precision. In this review, we present the ongoing development of histotripsy as a non-surgical alternative for extremity tumors and highlight the value of spontaneously occurring OS and STS in the pet dog as a comparative oncology research model to advance this field of histotripsy research.

The Impact of Implant Fixation Type on Reoperation Rates Following Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Surgery

BACKGROUND

Prospective evidence supporting the use of cemented or uncemented implants in endoprosthetic reconstruction is lacking. The present study aimed to determine the effect of cemented fixation compared with uncemented fixation on the rate of all-cause reoperation at 1 year postoperatively.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of the Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens In Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial. A total of 503 patients who underwent surgical excision and endoprosthetic reconstruction of a lower-extremity bone tumor were included in this analysis. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was utilized to assess the independent relationship between fixation group and implant survivorship, with all-cause reoperation as the end point.

RESULTS

There were 388 cemented implants and 115 uncemented implants. Participants had a mean age of 42.7 years (standard deviation, 22.0 years), and 59% were male. Overall, 131 reoperations were identified over the 1-year follow-up period. There were no significant differences found in all-cause reoperation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.57; p = 0.761), septic reoperation, or aseptic reoperation between cemented and uncemented fixation at 1 year postoperatively. The Cox regression analysis demonstrated that total operative time (HR per hour, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.20; p = 0.019) was an independent predictor of reoperation. The risk of reoperation was lower in patients with benign aggressive disease (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.80; p = 0.029) or metastatic bone disease (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.85; p = 0.023). Patients who underwent cemented fixation showed clinically meaningful functional improvement at 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cemented compared with uncemented fixation has no effect on 1-year all-cause reoperation rates in endoprosthetic reconstruction surgery. Further research is required to investigate the long-term survival of cemented versus uncemented implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Accuracy of MRI scans in predicting intra-articular joint involvement in high-grade sarcomas around the knee

Aims

Intra-articular (IA) tumours around the knee are treated with extra-articular (EA) resection, which is associated with poor functional outcomes. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in predicting IA involvement around the knee.

Methods

We identified 63 cases of high-grade sarcomas in or around the distal femur that underwent an EA resection from a prospectively maintained database (January 1996 to April 2020). Suspicion of IA disease was noted in 52 cases, six had IA pathological fracture, two had an effusion, two had prior surgical intervention (curettage/IA intervention), and one had an osseous metastasis in the proximal tibia. To ascertain validity, two musculoskeletal radiologists (R1, R2) reviewed the preoperative imaging (MRI) of 63 consecutive cases on two occasions six weeks apart. The radiological criteria for IA disease comprised evidence of tumour extension within the suprapatellar pouch, intercondylar notch, extension along medial/lateral retinaculum, and presence of IA fracture. The radiological predictions were then confirmed with the final histopathology of the resected specimens.

Results

The resection histology revealed 23 cases (36.5%) showing IA disease involvement compared with 40 cases without (62%). The intraobserver variability of R1 was 0.85 (p < 0.001) compared to R2 with κ = 0.21 (p = 0.007). The interobserver variability was κ = 0.264 (p = 0.003). Knee effusion was found to be the most sensitive indicator of IA involvement, with a sensitivity of 91.3% but specificity of only 35%. However, when combined with a pathological fracture, this rose to 97.5% and 100% when disease was visible in Hoffa's fat pad.

Conclusion

MRI imaging can sometimes overestimate IA joint involvement and needs to be correlated with clinical signs. In the light of our findings, we would recommend EA resections when imaging shows effusion combined with either disease in Hoffa's fat pad or retinaculum, or pathological fractures.

Joint-preservation surgery for bone sarcoma in adolescents and young adults

Bone sarcoma often occurs in childhood, as well as in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). AYAs differ from pediatric patients in that their bone is skeletally mature and the physis has almost disappeared with the completion of growth. Although AYAs spend less time outside, they often participate in sports activities, as well as driving, working, and raising a family, which are natural activities in daily living. Multidisciplinary approaches involving imaging, multi-agent chemotherapy, surgical procedures, and careful postoperative care has facilitated an increase in limb-sparing surgery for bone sarcoma. In addition, recent advances in imaging modalities and surgical techniques enables joint-preservation surgery, preserving the adjacent epiphysis, for selected patients following the careful assessment of the tumor margins and precise tumor excision. An advantage of this type of surgery is that it retains the native function of the adjacent joint, which differs from joint-prosthesis replacement, and provides excellent limb function. Various reconstruction procedures are available for joint-preserving surgery, including allograft, vascularized fibula graft, distraction osteogenesis, and tumor-devitalized autografts. However, procedure-related complications may occur, including non-union, infection, fracture, and implant failure, and surgeons should fully understand the advantages and disadvantages of these procedures. The longevity of the normal limb function for natural activities and the curative treatment without debilitation from late toxicities should be considered as a treatment goal for AYA patients. This review discusses the concept of joint-preservation surgery, types of reconstruction procedures associated with joint-preservation surgery, and current treatment outcomes.

A Viability Analysis of Tumor-Bearing Frozen Autograft for the Reconstruction After Resection of Malignant Bone Tumors Using 99m Tc-MDP Scintigraphy

PURPOSE OF THE REPORT

Several methods are used to reconstruct bony defects after malignant tumor excision. Tumor-bearing frozen autograft reconstruction is a biological procedure in which tumor-bearing bone is reused after devitalization with liquid nitrogen to kill tumor cells. The viability of frozen autografts has not been fully evaluated over time. We therefore aimed to evaluate the viability of devitalized bone grafts, using 99m Tc-MDP scintigraphy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-four patients who underwent frozen autograft reconstruction after the excision of a malignant bone tumor were enrolled. Two hundred forty-two postoperative 99m Tc-MDP scans were reviewed. For a quantitative analysis, the region of interest on the frozen bone segment and a symmetric region of interest on the contralateral normal area were manually set. The radioactive tracer uptake ratio was calculated by dividing the count density of the frozen bone segment by that of the contralateral normal area in each image. An uptake ratio of 0.9 to 1.1 was defined as a normalization of tracer uptake.

RESULTS

Normalization of tracer uptake was achieved in 95% to 97% of the cases by 60 months postoperatively, and earlier in the middle zone and peripheral zone in the pedicle freezing group in comparison to the free freezing group (both P = 0.03). Fracture and nonunion was associated with a low uptake ratio, whereas infection was associated with a high uptake ratio before the occurrence of the event.

CONCLUSIONS

The calculation of the uptake ratio using 99m Tc-MDP scans was an objective and accurate evaluation method. The period to normalization of tracer uptake in the pedicle frozen bone was significantly earlier than that in the free frozen bone. The postoperative complications can be also predicted.

Novel reconstruction method by mega-prosthesis wrapped with vancomycin-containing cement after resection of malignancies

To introduce wrapping vancomycin-containing cement around a mega-prosthesis (MP) as a novel method to prevent prosthetic joint infection after reconstruction surgery for malignant bone and soft tissue tumors. Five patients with malignant bone and soft tissue tumors treated at our hospital from April 2009 to December 2019 were included. The average age was 71.4 years. Four males and one female were included. Three patients had a bone tumor, and two had a soft tissue tumor. Three right thighs and two left femurs were affected. These tumors were identified histologically as undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, spindle cell sarcoma, diffuse large cell B-cell lymphoma, metastasis of renal cancer, and metastasis of lung cancer. All patients underwent tumor resection and reconstruction with a MP. In all cases, vancomycin-containing cement (2 g/40 g) was wrapped around the implant at the extension. The average follow-up period was 30.4 months. We surveyed whether infection occurred after surgical treatment. We also investigated the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score and clinical outcome. We observed no postoperative infection. One case of local recurrence was observed, and a hip dissection was performed. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 79.26 ± 1.26 (mean ± standard deviation) (range: 76-80.3). Three patients remained disease-free, one survived but with disease, and one died of disease. Wrapping vancomycin-containing cement around the MP may be a useful method of preventing postoperative joint infections.

Intercalary frozen autografts for reconstruction of bone defects following meta-/diaphyseal tumor resection at the extremities

Background

For patients with malignant limb tumors, salvage surgery can be achieved using endoprosthesis or biological reconstructions like allograft or autograft. In carefully selected patients, resected bone can be recycled after sterilization using methods like autoclaving, irradiation, pasteurization or freezing with liquid nitrogen. We evaluated the clinical outcome and complications of malignant limb tumors treated with intercalary resection and frozen autograft reconstruction.

Methods

We reviewed 33 patients whose malignant bone tumors were treated by wide resection and reconstruction with recycling liquid nitrogen-treated autografts between 2006 and 2017. Limb function, bone union at the osteotomy site and complications were evaluated. Functional outcome was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system.

Results

The cohort comprised 16 males and 17 females, with a mean age of 35.4 years (14–76 years). The most common tumor was osteosarcoma (7 cases). Tumors were located in the humerus (5), ulna (1), femur (10) and tibia (17). The mean follow-up was 49.9 months (range 12–127 months). Of the 33 patients, 16 remained disease-free, and 3 were alive with disease. The mean size of the defect after tumor resection was 11.6 cm (range 6–25 cm). Bone union was achieved in 32 patients, with a mean union time of 8.8 months (range 4–18 months). Complications included 1 graft nonunion, 2 infections (1 superficial, 1 deep infection), 1 leg length discrepancy, 2 graft fractures and 3 local recurrences. The mean MSTS score was 87.2% (range 70–100%).

Conclusion

Liquid nitrogen-treated tumor-bearing autograft is an effective option for biological reconstruction after meta-/diaphyseal tumor resection of long bones. This method has excellent clinical outcomes and is especially recommended for patients with no severe osteolytic bone tumors.

Hip reconstruction using a customized intercalary prosthesis with the rhino horn-designed uncemented stem for ultrashort proximal femur segments following tumor resection: a combined biomechanical and clinical study

Background

Hip-preserved reconstruction for patients with ultrashort proximal femur segments following extensive femoral diaphyseal tumor resection is a formidable undertaking. A customized intercalary prosthesis with a rhino horn-designed uncemented stem was developed for the reconstruction of these extensive skeletal defects.

Methods

This study was designed to analyze and compare the differences in the biomechanical behavior between the normal femur and the femur with diaphyseal defects reconstructed by an intercalary prosthesis with different stems. The biomechanical behavior under physiological loading conditions is analyzed using the healthy femur as the reference. Five three-dimensional finite element models (healthy, customized intercalary prosthesis with four different stems implemented, respectively) were developed, together with a clinical follow-up of 12 patients who underwent intercalary femoral replacement.

Results

The biomechanical results showed that normal-like stress and displacement distribution patterns were observed in the remaining proximal femur segments after reconstructions with the rhino horn-designed uncemented stems, compared with the straight stem. Stem A showed better biomechanical performance, whereas the fixation system with Stem B was relatively unstable. The clinical results were consistent with the FEA results. After a mean follow-up period of 32.33 ± 9.12 months, osteointegration and satisfactory clinical outcomes were observed in all patients. Aseptic loosening (asymptomatic) occurred in one patient reconstructed by Stem B; there were no other postoperative complications in the remaining 11 patients.

Conclusion

The rhino horn-designed uncemented stem is outstanding in precise shape matching and osseointegration. This novel prosthesis design may be beneficial in decreasing the risk of mechanical failure and aseptic loosening, especially when Stem A is used. Therefore, the customized intercalary prosthesis with this rhino horn-designed uncemented stem might be a reasonable alternative for the reconstruction of SSPF following extensive tumor resection.

What is the Cumulative Incidence of Revision Surgery and What Are the Complications Associated With Stemmed Cementless Nonextendable Endoprostheses in Patients 18 Years or Younger With Primary Bone Sarcomas About the Knee

BACKGROUND

Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are more common diagnoses in preadolescent and adolescent children compared with the adult population. A greater percentage of patients are treated with limb salvage and reconstruction using modular tumor endoprostheses. Implant-to-bone fixation can be cemented or cementless. Cementless tumor endoprostheses rely on biologic osteointegration for implant stability, and chemotherapy during childhood and adolescence can disturb the bone turnover rate and reduce bone mineral density, which in turn may predispose patients with uncemented endoprostheses to a high rate of revision surgeries.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the cumulative incidence of revision operations for any cause (wound dehiscence, periprosthetic fracture, hinge breakage, aseptic loosening, infection, local recurrence, implant removal, and amputation) of cementless tumor endoprostheses around the knee? (2) What is the cumulative incidence of aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, hinge breakage, and infection, and what proportion of patients had other complications? (3) What was the mean limb length discrepancy (LLD) at the time of skeletal maturity? (4) What was the median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score at most recent follow-up or just before implant removal/amputation if implant removal/amputation were performed?

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2019, we treated 328 patients younger than 18 years for a primary bone sarcoma around the knee at our institution. Of those, 138 were treated with resection and reconstruction using two different types of modular tumor endoprostheses. During this period, our general indications for an endoprosthesis were patients who were candidates for an intraarticular resection of the distal femur or proximal tibia and who were at least 10 years of age. Uncemented fixation was always preferred. Cemented fixation was only done when intraoperative press-fitting of a cementless stem was not possible. Among uncemented implants, 26 patients died before completing 2 years of follow-up with intact implants and without further surgery, three were lost to follow-up before 2 years, and four patients received implants as a secondary salvage surgery after a failed primary biologic reconstruction with a vascularized fibular bone graft, leaving 94 patients for evaluation in this retrospective study. The mean age was 15 ± 2 years and the median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 51 months (39 to 74). We did a competing risks analysis to tally cumulative incidence of all-cause revision procedures and cumulative incidence of aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, hinge breakage, and infection. Other complications, including wound dehiscence, local recurrence, and stem breakage, were characterized descriptively and ascertained by review of electronic records of a longitudinally maintained institutional database by the treating surgeons. LLD was measured by serial clinical assessments and CT scans, starting since primary salvage surgery and until the latest follow-up of every patient. For the analysis of remaining LLD, we included only patients who were skeletally immature at time of primary resection and who had reached skeletal maturity by their latest follow-up (73% [69 of 94]). Functional outcome was assessed using MSTS scores obtained from a review of electronic records of a longitudinally maintained institutional database.

RESULTS

The 8-year cumulative incidence of revision surgery for any cause was 32% (95% confidence interval 23% to 42%). The 8-year cumulative incidence of aseptic loosening was 5% (95% CI 2% to 11%), periprosthetic fracture was 9% (95% CI 4% to 15%), hinge breakage was 19% (95% CI 12% to 28%), and infection was 7% (95% CI 3% to 14%). Other complications included wound dehiscence in 2% (2 of 94), stem breakage in 2% (2 of 94), and local recurrence in 2% (2 of 94) of patients. Stress shielding of the cortical bone around implanted stems was observed in 26% (24 of 94). The mean LLD for those who were skeletally immature at the time of primary resection and who reached skeletal maturity was 3.5 ± 2.6 cm. At latest follow-up, the median (IQR) MSTS score for all patients, excluding those who had complete implant removal or amputation, was 26 (24 to 27) of a maximum score of 30.

CONCLUSION

We observed a high rate of early revision and relatively frequent complications associated with the use of cementless fixation, and although this was not a comparative study, the findings were not superior to those reported by others who have studied cemented fixation for this indication. Furthermore, there may be some disadvantages with cementless fixation, such as stress shielding. Comparative studies about fixation methods are needed. The prevalence of bushing breakage in the current study highlights the importance of future modifications in the hinge design of both types of prostheses used in this study. Patients who were skeletally immature at the time of primary surgery had a LLD no more than 5 cm at skeletal maturity; consequently, nonexpandable endoprostheses may be appropriate for some adolescent patients who have limited remaining growth, although which patients are best suited for this approach would require specific study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

Evaluation of tumor-prostheses over time: Complications, functional outcome, and comparative statistical analysis after resection and reconstruction in orthopedic oncologic conditions in the lower extremities

Objectives:

Previous multicenter studies report variable outcomes and failure rates after tumor-prosthetic reconstructions. The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate implant survival, limb survival, and functional outcome in a cohort of patients who underwent resection of primary malignancies or aggressive benign bone tumors and reconstruction with modern tumor-prostheses in the lower extremities and (2) to provide comparison to a historical cohort on previous generations of tumor-prostheses from the same center.

Methods:

A longitudinal retrospective single-center study of 72 consecutive patients (F/M = 30/42), mean age = 44 (range = 7–84) years with bone, soft tissue sarcoma adjacent to bone (n = 69), and aggressive benign bone tumors (n = 3) having surgery between 2006 and 2016 with bone resection and reconstruction with tumor-prostheses were compared to a historical cohort from1985 to 2005. Revisions were classified as major and minor revisions. Causes of failure were classified according to the Henderson classification. Fine and Gray competing risk analysis was used for assessing cumulative incidence for implant revision and limb amputation. Functional outcome was evaluated with Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score system.

Results:

Forty-seven patients were alive at the end of the study. Mean follow-up was 6 years (range = 2–13 years). Ten-year cumulative risk of major revision was 18% (95% confidence interval = 9%–28%). Deep infection and recurrence of tumor caused most revisions in modern tumor-prostheses. Ten-year cumulative incidence of limb amputation was 11% (95% confidence interval = 3%–18%). According to the Henderson classification, the overall predominant failure mode was non-mechanical (n = 20, 51%). Mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score was 20 (67%) (range = 0–30).

Conclusion:

A minimum of 2 years follow-up with modern modular tumor-prostheses demonstrated a relatively low risk of implant failure and amputation and also an acceptable functional outcome. No statistical difference of, implant survival, limb survival and functional outcome between tumor-prostheses over two time periods was observed, possibly explained by Type 2 error.

Neutropenia and Infection Prophylaxis in Childhood Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pediatric oncology patients frequently experience episodes of prolonged neutropenia which puts them at high risk for infection with significant morbidity and mortality. Here, we review the data on infection prophylaxis with a focus on both pharmacologic and ancillary interventions. This review does not include patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with hematologic malignancies are at highest risk for infection. Bacterial and fungal prophylaxis decrease the risk of infection in certain high-risk groups. Ancillary measures such as ethanol locks, chlorhexidine gluconate baths, GCSF, IVIG, and mandatory hospitalization do not have enough data to support routine use. There is limited data on risk of infection and role of prophylaxis in patients receiving immunotherapy and patients with solid tumors. Patients with Down syndrome and adolescent and young adult patients may benefit from additional supportive care measures and protocol modifications. Consider utilizing bacterial and fungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. More research is needed to evaluate other supportive care measures and the role of prophylaxis in patients receiving immunotherapy.

The value of megaprostheses in non-oncological fractures in elderly patients: A short-term results

INTRODUCTION

The management of both hip and distal femur fractures as well as periprosthetic fractures can be challenging for orthopaedic surgeons. The use of megaprosthetic implants could provide substantial advantages in elderly population affected by complex fractures. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of megaprosthetic implants for treating hip and distal femur fractures as well as periprosthetic fractures in elderly.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 1st 2015 to December 31st 2019, patients treated for proximal or distal femoral fractures with severe bone loss or failure of previous surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two group based on diagnosis: proximal femur fractures (group A) and distal femur fractures (group B). Subsequently, patients underwent hip (group A) or knee (group B) megaprosthesis. Self-assessed questionnaires were administered to all patients pre and postoperatively. Primary outcome was the Activity Daily Living. Secondary outcomes were: Instrumental Activity Daily Living, Short Form-12, Oxford knee or hip score, complications. Charlson score, Harris classification for hip or Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute score and complication were recorded. All patients underwent a radiological follow up to rule out implant loosening and mobilization. Pre and postoperative functional score comparisons in each group were undertaken. Significance was set p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were finally included in the study. There were 6 male and 6 females, the mean age was 72,9 years old (± 7,4); the mean BMI was 29,8 points (± 4.5). The mean follow-up was 2.9 years (± 1.4). No differences could be found between pre and postoperative evaluation in each group. No aseptic loosening, dislocation, mobilization or radiolucency were recorded during the follow-up. In group A, two surgical site infections (2/6 patients) and one pneumonia (1/6 patients) were recorded. In group B, two surgical site infections occurred (2/6 patients). All patients were treated by antimicrobial oral therapy with complete regression.

CONCLUSION

The use of hip and knee megaprosthetic implants in traumatology is a safe and viable option in elderly patients.

Does Local Zoledronate Applied to Pasteurized Bone Autografts Improve the Likelihood of Union of Graft-Host Junctions after Limb-sparing Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Pasteurized bone autograft is a recycling biological reconstruction method for limb-sparing surgery when an allograft or other reconstruction technique is unavailable. Since the application of a local bisphosphonate to morselized allografts can reduce graft resorption and enhance bone formation without systemic complications, adding the local bisphosphonate to pasteurized bone autografts should reduce the graft resorption and improve the graft incorporation to host bone. However, no study that we know of has described the outcomes of local bisphosphonate application to massive allografts or pasteurized bone autografts. Thus, this study compared the outcomes of pasteurized bone autografts with and without local zoledronate.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the survival of pasteurized bone autografts and what complications lead to graft removal? (2) Does treatment of pasteurized bone autografts with zoledronate alter the survival of pasteurized bone autografts compared with grafts without treatment? (3) Does the local application of zoledronate reduce the proportion of patients with fractures because of metaphyseal graft resorption? (4) Does local application of zoledronate improve union at the graft-host bone junction compared with untreated grafts?

METHODS

Between July 2011 and December 2019, we performed 538 musculoskeletal bone tumor resections. Of these, 101 patients underwent reconstruction with pasteurized bone autografts. Other reconstructions included tumor prostheses (150 patients), allografts (70 patients), reconstruction using a bone cement-plate construct (62 patients), and resection only (155 patients). We generally used pasteurized bone autograft when tumors showed an osteoblastic pattern, had less than one-third cortical destruction, and less than half of metaphyseal bone destruction. Six percent (6 of 101) were lost to follow-up, 6% (6 of 101) had incomplete clinical data, and 16% (16 of 101) had a follow-up period less than 2 years without an event, leaving 73 patients for evaluation. The median (interquartile range) age of the patients was 18 years (15 to 26). Ninety-seven percent (71 of 73) had a diagnosis of bone sarcoma. The median follow-up time was 46 months (33 to 75). From 2011 to 2014, 21 pasteurized bone autografts were prepared without local zoledronate, and from 2014 to 2019, 52 pasteurized bone autografts were prepared with local zoledronate because we thought it might improve union and reduce resorption of the graft. From our tumor registry database, we obtained age, sex, use of chemotherapy, graft length and location, pasteurized bone graft type, fixation methods, the use of local zoledronate, osteotomy gap, complications, proportion of grafts that united by 2 years, and local recurrences. Curves for graft survival were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method with the endpoint of autograft removal and metaphyseal fracture from graft resorption. The probabilities of graft removal were estimated by cumulative incidences using the competing risk analysis, where death was considered as the competing event. Intergroup differences in survival and multivariable analyses were performed using the log-rank test and a Cox regression analysis. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between graft-host osseous union by 2 years and other baseline factors. Union was defined when a callus was seen to bridge the osteotomy line for at least three cortices in both the AP and mediolateral planes.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate of all 73 pasteurized grafts was 85% (95% confidence interval 74% to 92%). With the numbers available, we found no difference in the 5-year survival rates between grafts with and without local zoledronate (90% [95% CI 78% to 96%] versus 74% [95% CI 48% to 89%]; p = 0.30). Eleven percent (8 of 73) of patients had metaphyseal fractures because of graft resorption, primarily associated with osteoarticular grafts (5-year fracture-free survival 56% [95% CI 20 to 80]) rather than pasteurized graft-prosthesis composites (94% [95% CI 78% to 98%]) and intercalary grafts (91% [95% CI 50 to 99]; p = 0.001); there was no association with the use of local zoledronate (13%; 7 of 52) compared with those without local zoledronate (5%; 1 of 21) (odds ratio 3.1 [95% CI 0.4 to 27]; p = 0.43). Of the 84 graft-host bone junctions, 85% (71) of the grafts unified within 2 years, 7% (6) unified after 2 years, and 8% (7) of grafts showed nonunion. Union within 2 years was associated with fixation using plate compared with those with stem and with both stem and plate (odds ratio 6.6 [95% CI 1.4 to 31]; p = 0.02) and grafts treated with local zoledronate compared with those without treatment (OR 5.9 [95% CI 1.3 to 28]; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The application of local zoledronate to pasteurized bone autografts for limb-sparing surgery improved the likelihood of graft union compared with untreated grafts, especially when the osteotomy junctions were fixed using plate osteosynthesis, but it did not appear to alter the proportion of patients who experience metaphyseal fracture of the grafts because of graft resorption. Although this is a small study, it suggests that the treatment of pasteurized bone autografts and perhaps bone allografts should be studied further to determine whether bisphosphonates or other adjuncts can improve the union time and return to function in patients undergoing bone tumor resections using these reconstruction types.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Frequency and reason for reoperation following non-invasive expandable endoprostheses: A systematic review

•

Implant failure is the most common reason for revision of growing prostheses.

•

Maximum prosthesis growth with a residual LLD is the most common mode of failure.

•

Functional outcomes are good, but 1/ 5 patients have a persistent LLD over 2 cm.

Background

Non-invasive expandable endoprostheses (NIEPR) utilize an external electromagnetic field to drive an innate mechanical gearbox. This lengthens the extremity following oncological resections in children with a predicted limb length discrepancy (LLD), facilitating limb-salvage. This review was conducted to assess NIEPR implant survival rates and identify modes of implant failure unique to these prostheses.

Methods

Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for all manuscripts evaluating implant survival of NIEPRs implanted into skeletally immature patients following resection of extremity sarcomas. Minimum follow-up of 12 months or implant failure was required for inclusion. Failures were classified using the latest ISOLS classification and exact implant-specific failure modality was also identified.

Results

19 studies met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 10.0 years (7.7 – 11.4 years). The most common locations for NIEPR implantation were the distal femur (343, 76.7%) and proximal tibia (53, 119%). Mean follow-up was 65.3 months (19.4 – 163 months). The overall implant revision rate was 46.2% (0 – 100%); implant specific revisions included maximal prosthesis lengthening with persistent LLD (10.4%), failed extension mechanism (6.1%), implant fracture (7.7%), hinge fracture (1.4%) and bushing wear (0.9%). Persistent clinically significant (>20 mm) LLD at final follow-up was present in 19.2% (0 – 50%) of patients. The mean MSTS score was 85.1% (66.7–96.3%) at final follow-up.

Conclusion

Implant-related failures are the most common reason for NIEPR revision. Implant reliability appears to be improved with current designs. A sub-classification to the current classification system based on implant-specific failures for NIEPRs is proposed.

Acetabular complications are the most common cause for revision surgery following proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement : what is the best bearing option in the primary and revision setting?

AIMS

Proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacements (PFEPRs) are the most common reconstruction option for osseous defects following primary and metastatic tumour resection. This study aimed to compare the rate of implant failure between PFEPRs with monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties and acetabular arthroplasties, and determine the optimum articulation for revision PFEPRs.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of 233 patients who underwent PFEPR. The mean age was 54.7 years (SD 18.2), and 99 (42.5%) were male. There were 90 patients with primary bone tumours (38.6%), 122 with metastatic bone disease (52.4%), and 21 with haematological malignancy (9.0%). A total of 128 patients had monopolar (54.9%), 74 had bipolar hemiarthroplasty heads (31.8%), and 31 underwent acetabular arthroplasty (13.3%).

RESULTS

At a mean 74.4 months follow-up, the overall revision rate was 15.0%. Primary malignancy (p < 0.001) and age < 50 years (p < 0.001) were risk factors for revision. The risks of death and implant failure were similar in patients with primary disease (p = 0.872), but the risk of death was significantly greater for patients who had metastatic bone disease (p < 0.001). Acetabular-related implant failures comprised 74.3% of revisions; however, no difference between hemiarthroplasty or arthroplasty groups (p = 0.209), or between monopolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasties (p = 0.307), was observed. There was greater radiological wear in patients with longer follow-up and primary bone malignancy. Re-revision rates following a revision PFEPR was 34.3%, with dual-mobility bearings having the lowest rate of instability and re-revision (15.4%).

CONCLUSION

Hemiarthroplasty and arthroplasty PFEPRs carry the same risk of revision in the medium term, and is primarily due to acetabular complications. There is no difference in revision rates or erosion between monopolar and bipolar hemiarthroplasties. The main causes of failure were acetabular wear in the hemiarthroplasty group and instability in the arthroplasty group. These risks should be balanced and patient prognosis considered when contemplating the bearing choice. Dual-mobility, constrained bearings, or large diameter heads (> 32 mm) are recommended in all revision PFEPRs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(10):1633-1640.

Computer Assisted Surgery and 3D Printing in Orthopaedic Oncology: A Lesson Learned by Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery

Primary bone sarcomas are rare tumors and surgical resection in combination with chemo and radiation therapy is the mainstay of treatment. Some specific anatomical sites still represent a reconstructive challenge due to their complex three-dimensional anatomy. In recent years, patient specific instruments along with 3D printing technology has come to represent innovative techniques in orthopaedic oncology. We retrospectively reviewed 23 patients affected by primary bone sarcoma treated with patient-specific instruments and 3D printing custom made prostheses. At follow up after approximately two years, the infection rate was 26%, mechanical complication rate 13%, and local recurrence rate 13% (with a five-years implant survival rate of 74%). Based on our experience, patient-specific instruments and 3D custom-made prostheses represents a reliable and safe technique for improving the accuracy of resection of primary bone tumour, with a particular use in pelvic surgery ameliorating functional results.

A Correlation Between Intracellular Zinc Content and Osteosarcoma

Zinc is a trace element in human body involved in many biological processes. It is critical for cell growth and acts as a cofactor for the structure and function of a wide range of cellular proteins such as enzymes. Mounting evidence has shown the involvement of intracellular zinc in the bone-related biological processes such as bone growth, homeostasis, and regeneration; however, the molecular mechanism(s) whereby zinc impels tumorigenesis in bone remains largely unexplored. In this article, selective outline related to the content of intracellular zinc in osteosarcoma cells was provided, and its correlation with signaling molecules that are activated and consequently guide the cells toward tumorigenesis or osteogenesis was discussed. Based on preclinical and clinical evidence, dysregulation of zinc homeostasis, both at intracellular and tissue level, has the main role in the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma. Based on the intracellular zinc content, this element could have a direct role in the dynamics of bone cell transformation and tumor development and play an indirect role in the modulation of the inflammatory and pro/antitumorigenic responses in immune cells. In this context, zinc transporters and the proteins containing zinc domain are regulated by the availability of zinc, playing a crucial role in bone cell transformation and differentiation. According to recent studies, it seems that intracellular zinc levels could be considered as an early prognosis marker. Besides, identification and targeting of zinc-dependent signaling molecules could tilt the balance of life and death toward the latter in chemoresistant malignant cells and may pave a way for designing of the novel osteosarcoma treatment strategies.

Clinical outcomes of frozen autograft reconstruction for the treatment of primary bone sarcoma in adolescents and young adults

Age affects the clinical outcomes of cancer treatment, including those for bone sarcoma. Successful reconstruction using frozen autograft after excision of bone sarcoma has been reported; however, little is known about the clinical outcomes of frozen autograft reconstruction according to age. The purpose was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the frozen autograft reconstruction focusing on skeletally mature adolescents and young adults (AYAs) that was 15 to 39 years of age. A total of 37 AYA patients with primary bone sarcoma on the appendicular skeleton were enrolled in this study. The mean follow-up period was 89 months. The graft survival (GS), overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), complications and the function were retrospectively evaluated using medical records. The 10-year GS, OS, and RFS rates were 76%, 84%, and 79%, respectively. Bone union was achieved with a rate of 94% within 1 year after surgery, and nonunion (n = 1) and fracture (n = 2) were infrequently observed. Graft removal was performed in 7 cases, and the most common reason for the removal was infection (n = 5). The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was excellent in 23 cases of the available 29 cases. Frozen autograft reconstruction for AYAs showed excellent clinical outcomes, although the long-term follow-up is required.

Predicting length of stay after proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for oncological conditions

BACKGROUND

Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur plays a vital role in managing metastatic and primary bone tumours¹. Length of stay (LOS) has important resource implications but is driven by patient and disease factors over and above the procedure itself. The aim of this project was to identify factors that drive LOS in patients undergoing proximal femoral replacement (PFR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of clinical records from a single centre (RNOH). 144 cases were identified over a 4 year-period. These were divided into 3 diagnostic categories: primary bone tumour with chemotherapy, primary bone tumour without chemotherapy and metastatic bone disease. Several factors were considered that could influence the length of stay including age, ASA grade, gender, admission to the high dependency unit (HDU), diagnosis, saving the greater trochanter, pre-operative radiotherapy, admission with a fracture and return to theatre.

RESULTS

The median LOS for PFR was 15 days, with 79% admitted to HDU. LOS was almost doubled for patients returning to theatre (P = 0.04). Patients with ASA grades of 3 and 4 had a 75% longer LOS compared to those with grade 1. Additionally, a 10-year increase in age was associated with a 6-8% increase in LOS. Incorporating these factors produced a model which explained 27% of the variability of LOS.

CONCLUSION

Majority of the variables which were tested were significantly associated with LOS. However, factors other than those in our model drive length of stay. This analysis can support conversations with patients and service planning around LOS.

The Bateman-Type Soft Tissue Reconstruction around Proximal or Total Humeral Megaprostheses in Patients with Primary Malignant Bone Tumors-Functional Outcome and Endoprosthetic Complications

We aimed to evaluate the functional outcome and endoprosthetic complications following the Bateman-type soft tissue reconstruction around proximal or total humeral replacements in patients undergoing resection of a primary malignant bone tumor. Between September 2001 and December 2018, a total of 102 patients underwent resection of a primary malignant bone tumor and subsequent reconstruction with a modular humeral megaprosthesis in our department. Fifteen (15%) of these patients underwent a Bateman-type soft tissue reconstruction and were included in this retrospective study. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 21, the median Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) was 70, and the median American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 72. Fifty-three percent (8/15) of all patients required a revision surgery after a median time of 6 months. There were 2 soft tissue failures, 3 infections and 3 tumor recurrences. The revision-free implant survivorship amounted to 53% (95% confidence interval (CI) 28-81) after 1 year and 47% (95% CI 22-73) at last follow-up. The Bateman-type reconstruction is a feasible option for soft tissue reconstruction but functional outcome is overall limited and the risk for revision surgery within the first postoperative year is high.

Surgical treatment of skeletal metastases in proximal tibia: a multicenter case series of 74 patients

Background and purpose - The proximal tibia is a rare site for metastatic bone disease and is a challenging anatomical site to manage due to the proximity to the knee joint and poor soft tissue envelope. We investigated implant survival and complications of different surgical strategies in the treatment of proximal tibia pathological fractures.Patients and methods - The study comprised a 4 medical center, retrospective analysis of 74 patients surgically treated for metastases of the proximal tibia. Patient records were reviewed to identify outcome, incidence, and type of complications as well as contributing factors.Results - Reconstruction techniques comprised cement-augmented osteosynthesis (n = 33), tumor prosthesis (n = 31), and total knee arthroplasty with long cemented stems (n = 10). Overall implant survival was 88% at 6 months and 1 year, and 67% at 3 years. After stratification by technique, the implant survival was 82% and 71% at 1 and 3 years with tumor prosthesis, 100% at 1 and 3 years with total knee arthroplasty, and 91% at 1 year and 47% at 3 years with osteosynthesis. Preoperative radiotherapy decreased implant survival. Complications were observed in 19/74 patients. Treatment complications led to amputation in 5 patients.Interpretation - In this study, the best results were seen with both types of prothesis reconstructions, with good implant survival, when compared with treatment with osteosynthesis. However, patients treated with tumor prosthesis showed an increased incidence of postoperative infection, which resulted in poor implant survival. Osteosynthesis with cement is a good alternative for patients with short expected survival whereas endoprosthetic replacement achieved good medium-term results.

Megaprosthesis Versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for the Management of Massive Skeletal Defects: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Megaprosthesis and Allograft Prosthesis Composite (APC) are the established treatment modalities for massive skeletal defects. There are a handful of studies comparing the use of megaprosthesis and APC in the management of substantial bone loss and it has always been a topic of debate regarding the superiority of one modality over the other. Therefore, we aim to compare the functional outcome and implant survivorship of each modality including complications, revision rates, amputation rate and mortality.

RECENT FINDINGS

The Allograft Prosthesis Composite (APC) constitutes a skeletal allograft implanted with a revision type prosthesis in it. The biological environment provided by the allograft allows attachment of the muscles and tendons imparting better stability and function. However, the literature is not kind enough with APC due to associated risk of infection, disease transmission and nonunion at the graft-host junction. The megaprosthesis (MP) on the other hand is a nonbiologic modality with better survivorship but subservient functional outcome. Infection has been a major issue in both the modalities. Advancement in metallurgy using silver coated megaprosthesis also failed to provide strong evidence in preventing infection. The functional outcome is better with APC in both the upper and lower limbs. However, the survivorship is better with megaprosthesis, especially in the upper limb when revision rates were compared between the two modalities. Deep infection and mechanical complications were significantly higher in the APC group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of amputation rate, mortality, and local recurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE (CEBM)

2a.

Comparison of T1-weighted turbo spin echo and out-of-phase T1-weighted gradient echo Dixon MRI for the assessment of intra-medullary length of appendicular bone tumours

OBJECTIVE

Intra-medullary tumour length is accurately assessed on T1-weighted turbo spin echo (T1W TSE) MRI which can be relatively time consuming, whilst the gradient echo Dixon (T1W GrE Dixon) technique is a rapid sequence (imaging time ~ 30 s). The aim of this study was to determine if the out-of-phase Dixon (OP T1W GrE Dixon) sequence can produce equivalent measurements of intra-medullary tumour length compared to the T1W TSE sequence.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Tumour length was assessed in 90 patients undergoing MRI for staging of primary bone tumours with both T1W TSE and OP T1W GrE Dixon MRI sequences at 3 T (n = 42) and 1.5 T (n = 48). Tumour length was measured independently by different observers allowing assessment of inter-observer correlation, and the correlation between measurements on T1W TSE and OP T1W GrE Dixon sequences was also determined.

RESULTS

There were 53 males and 37 females (mean age 36.4 years; range 2-77 years). Inter-observer correlation for tumour length on both the T1W TSE and T1W OP GrE Dixon sequences was very good (ICC = 0.94-0.98), and measurement of tumour length comparing T1W TSE and T1W GrE Dixon was also very good (ICC = 0.91-0.99). In 4 cases, tumour length was significantly overestimated on T1W TSE images due to extensive reactive marrow oedema, but more accurately determined on the OP sequence when compared to resection specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The OP T1W GrE Dixon sequence is comparable to T1W TSE for assessment of the intra-medullary length of appendicular bone tumours, and more accurate in the presence of extensive reactive marrow oedema.

Current Status of Management and Outcome for Patients with Ewing Sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma is the second most common bone sarcoma in children after osteosarcoma. It is a very aggressive malignancy for which systemic treatment has greatly improved outcome for patients with localized disease, who now see survival rates of over 70%. However, for the quarter of patients presenting with metastatic disease, survival is still dismal with less than 30% of patients surviving past 5 years. Patients with disease relapse, local or distant, face an even poorer prognosis with an event-free 5-year survival rate of only 10%. Unfortunately, Ewing sarcoma patients have not yet seen the benefit of recent years' technical achievements such as next-generation sequencing, which have enabled researchers to study biological systems at a level never seen before. In spite of large multinational studies, treatment of Ewing sarcoma relies entirely on chemotherapeutic agents that have been largely unchanged for decades. As many promising modern therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, and immunotherapy, have been disappointing to date, there is no clear candidate as to which drug should be investigated in the next large-scale clinical trial. However, the mechanisms driving tumor development in Ewing sarcoma are slowly unfolding. New entities of Ewing-like tumors, with fusion transcripts that are related to the oncogenic EWSR1-FLI1 fusion seen in the majority of Ewing tumors, are being mapped. These tumors, although sharing much of the same morphologic features as classic Ewing sarcoma, behave differently and may require a different treatment. There are also controversies regarding local treatment of Ewing sarcoma. The radiosensitive nature of the disease and the tendency for Ewing sarcoma to arise in the axial skeleton make local treatment very challenging. Surgical treatment and radiotherapy have their pros and cons, which may give rise to different treatment strategies in different centers around the world. This review article discusses some of these controversies and reproduces the highlights from recent publications with regard to diagnostics, systemic treatment, and surgical treatment of Ewing sarcoma.

Limb salvage surgery of primary and metastatic bone tumors of the lower extremity: Functional outcomes and survivorship of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The study was aimed to determine the survivorship and functional outcomes of modular endoprosthetic reconstruction in the management of primary and metastatic bone tumors of the lower limbs and to investigate the rate and causes of implant failure.

METHODS

A total of 84 limbs of 82 patients (49 male, 33 female; mean age=48 years, age range=13-78 years) with a minimum follow-up of 12 months in whom resection and modular endoprosthetic reconstructions were performed for primary or metastatic bone tumors of the lower extremity were retrospectively reviewed and included in the study. The mean follow-up was 43 (range=13-119) months. Functional status was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system at the final follow-up. Implant survival was defined as the time from implantation until partial or complete exchange of the prosthesis secondary to mechanical or nonmechanical causes or amputation. The effects of the anatomical site on functional scores and implant survival were statistically analyzed. Additionally, the effects of diagnosis and adjuvant treatments on functional scores, implant survival, and failure rates were investigated.

RESULTS

At the time of the study, 55 patients were still alive with a mean follow-up of 48 (range=15-119) months. The mean MSTS scores resulting from the final follow-up of all patients and of those surviving were 87.9% (range=16%-100%) and 86.8% (range=16%-100%), respectively. Overall implant survival was 95.2%, 89.2%, 87%, and 87% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. Statistically, both functional scores and implant survival analysis in different anatomical sites were found similar. In 15 of the patients (17.8%), endoprosthetic reconstructions had failed. The causes of failure were soft tissue failure (dislocation) in 5 patients, infection in 5, structural/mechanical failure in 2, local recurrence in two, and aseptic loosening in one. The diagnosis and receiving preoperative and/or postoperative adjuvant treatment did not affect functional scores, implant survival or failure rates.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study have shown that modular endoprosthetic replacement can provide satisfactory functional results and a durable mid-term limb salvage option in the management of patients with primary and metastatic bone tumors of the lower limbs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Therapeutic Study.

Surgical Advances in Osteosarcoma

Simple Summary

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common bone cancer in children. OS most commonly arises in the legs, but can arise in any bone, including the spine, head or neck. Along with chemotherapy, surgery is a mainstay of OS treatment and in the 1990s, surgeons began to shift from amputation to limb-preserving surgery. Since then, improvements in imaging, surgical techniques and implant design have led to improvements in functional outcomes without compromising on the cancer outcomes for these patients. This paper summarises these advances, along with a brief discussion of future technologies currently in development.

Abstract

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone cancer in children and, unfortunately, is associated with poor survival rates. OS most commonly arises around the knee joint, and was traditionally treated with amputation until surgeons began to favour limb-preserving surgery in the 1990s. Whilst improving functional outcomes, this was not without problems, such as implant failure and limb length discrepancies. OS can also arise in areas such as the pelvis, spine, head, and neck, which creates additional technical difficulty given the anatomical complexity of the areas. We reviewed the literature and summarised the recent advances in OS surgery. Improvements have been made in many areas; developments in pre-operative imaging technology have allowed improved planning, whilst the ongoing development of intraoperative imaging techniques, such as fluorescent dyes, offer the possibility of improved surgical margins. Technological developments, such as computer navigation, patient specific instruments, and improved implant design similarly provide the opportunity to improve patient outcomes. Going forward, there are a number of promising avenues currently being pursued, such as targeted fluorescent dyes, robotics, and augmented reality, which bring the prospect of improving these outcomes further.

What Opinions Do Tumor Reconstructive Surgeons Have about Sports Activity after Megaprosthetic Replacement in Hip and Knee? Results of the MoReSports Expert Opinion Online Survey

Sports activity has many benefits in cancer survivors. A key one is having sport activity contribute to the well-being of the individual. However, there are no guidelines about the intensity and kind of postoperative mobility workouts after hip or knee megaprosthetic treatment. Opinion research about sports after modular bone and joint replacement may provide an understanding of surgeons' attitudes on sports activity after megaprostheses of the hip and knee joint. A web survey with members of three international professional organizations of orthopedic tumor reconstructive surgeons was conducted between September 2016 and January 2018. Members were invited via personalized emails by the European Musculoskeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS), the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS), and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS). The questionnaire included 26 questions. A total of 149 surgeons started the survey, and 76 finished the entire survey (American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) second response rate (RR2) EMSOS: 12.3%; ISOLS: 21.9%; MSTS: n/a). More than half of the respondents encourage sarcoma survivors after megaprosthetic treatment to reach an activity level that would allow them to regularly participate in active sporting events of University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity level 7 and higher. Orthopedic tumor reconstructive surgeons do fear a number of complications (periprosthetic fracture, allograft failure/fracture, loosening, prosthetic or bearing failure, and early polyethylene wear) due to sports activity after modular bone-joint replacement, but they actually witness fewer complications than they conceptually anticipated. According to the surgeons' opinions, between four to seven types of sports after surgery could reasonably be recommended depending on the type of hip or knee procedures. This survey provides insights into opinions on what could be recommended, what could be allowed if surgeons and their patients agree on the potential negative outcome, and which sports should definitely not be allowed after hip and knee megaprostheses.

3D-Printed Modular Hemipelvic Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Following Periacetabular Tumor Resection: Early Results of 80 Consecutive Cases

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction with an endoprosthesis following pelvic tumor resection has increased over the years. However, the long-term results reflect a disappointing frequency of mechanical complications and failures. In an attempt to enhance implant fixation, an electron beam melting (EBM)-based modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis was introduced. Our aim was to explore the preliminary clinical outcomes for patients who have been managed with this prosthesis.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 80 consecutive patients who had been managed at a single center between June 2015 and September 2017. Chondrosarcoma was the predominant diagnosis (31.3%). Osseous metastases were diagnosed in 16 patients (20.0%). The position of the reconstructed metallic acetabulum was measured on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. Bone ingrowth was evaluated in 2 samples harvested from patients with tumor recurrence.

RESULTS

After a median duration of follow-up of 32.5 months (range, 9 to 52 months), no acetabular component instability was detected on radiographs. Histological sectioning of specimens harvested from 2 patients with tumor recurrence showed bone trabeculae extending toward the implant and bone ingrowth within the porous network. At the time of the latest follow-up, 59 patients (73.8%) were alive with no evidence of disease, 5 patients (6.3%) were alive with disease, and 16 patients (20.0%) had died of disease. Local recurrence occurred in 9 patients (11.3%). The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score at the time of the latest follow-up was 83.9% (range, 43% to 100%). Complications occurred in 16 patients (20%), with wound dehiscence being the most common complication (8 patients; 10%). No aseptic loosening was found. Five patients (6.3%) had deep infection, and 2 patients (2.5%) had dislocation.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a 3-dimensional (3D)-printed modular hemipelvic endoprosthesis with a highly porous metal interface represents a potential choice as a pelvic endoprosthesis after internal hemipelvectomy for the treatment of a primary or metastatic tumor. These preliminary results demonstrate stable fixation with acceptable early functional and radiographic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.