Brachymetacarpia and brachymetatarsia: do we need to operate?

External fixators and lengthening systems in pediatric upper limb

The use of external fixators is part of the cultural background of orthopedic surgeons in treating numerous clinical conditions. Over the years, fixator design and biomechanical knowledge have led to different solutions and techniques, and bone lengthening and its better understanding come together with the development of external fixators and the application of the biological principle of distraction osteogenesis. The authors conducted a literature review about using external fixators and lengthening systems in pediatric upper limbs. Despite the applications of external fixators in upper limbs remaining much more limited than those of the lower limbs, there are indications of traumatic, congenital, tumor, and infectious etiologies. However, despite the spread of new systems of plate and screws and intramedullary lengthening nails, the problems about when to use external fixation remain unsolved. Another debated point is about using monolateral or circular frames for humeral lengthening and the correction of forearm deformities in multiple hereditary exostoses disease (MHE) or radial longitudinal deficiency sequelae. Monoaxial fixators retain a prominent role for skeletal lengthening in all the districts examined, although their role could be outclassed by the motorized intramedullary nails, especially for humeral lengthening. Hexapod systems are likely to represent the future for the correction of multiplanar forearm deformities; however, multicenter studies on larger series will be necessary to better validate their applications and advantages.

What's the evidence on surgical treatment for congenital brachymetatarsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Brachymetatarsia is marked by the shortened length of one or more metatarsal bones. Several operative options have been suggested without demonstrating the superiority of one treatment over another. This study aims to assess the main available treatment, bone lengthening achieved, clinical outcomes, and complications pertaining to congenital brachymetatarsia interventions.

Methods

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines.

Result

After the screening process, 13 articles were included in the review. Brachymetatarsia mainly occurs in females at a ratio of 14.8:1, and bilateral involvement in 25.8 % of cases. The fourth metatarsal is most affected, followed by the first metatarsal. The main surgical procedures are one-stage approach which results in limited length gain but fewer complications, and gradual lengthening which achieves greater length but has a higher complication rate, including metatarsophalangeal or interphalangeal subluxation, fractures, and infections. The first metatarsal reported better values concerning lengthening rate and healing index compared to fourth metatarsal, while no differences were observed in distraction rates or clinical outcomes. More complications, such as stiffness, fractures, and cavus foot were associated with first metatarsal lengthening.

Conclusions

It is not possible to identify a gold standard technique for addressing this condition. The two predominant surgical techniques bear advantages and drawbacks. A judicious case-by-case assessment is mandatory to determine the optimal surgical approach. Exploring the combination of techniques could be promise in mitigating the limitations associated with the main two methods and achieving better forefoot balance.

Level of evidence

Level II, systematic review.