Current provision of simulation in the UK and Republic of Ireland trauma and orthopaedic specialist training: a national survey

Exploring Trauma Simulation: Insights from the Simulation in Trauma Across Resident Training (START) Study and Trainee Experiences

Introduction and objective Advancements in technology have presented an opportunity to incorporate simulation training into the trauma and orthopedic (T&O) curriculum. This study aimed to assess the perspective of T&O trainees regarding the acceptability and perceived educational impact of simulation training before and after a training day. This includes identifying the resources that trainees are likely to use and find helpful when preparing for a new or unfamiliar procedure, as well as evaluating their opinions on different levels of simulation fidelity. The null hypothesis for this study is that there is no difference in educational value after exposure to various simulation modalities. Methods This was a three-arm crossover cohort observational study involving 18 T&O specialty trainees in their first three years of training who attended a simulation training course, involving four independent stations with simulation tasks of varying fidelities. Pre-course and post-course questionnaires with a 10-point Likert scale to determine if simulation training exposure affected the perception of educational value. Data were treated non-parametrically with median (±median absolute deviation; 95% Bonnett-Price CI). Statistical significance was calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test and set as p<0.05. Results Twelve trainees (67%) had not previously used orthopedic simulators to prepare for unfamiliar operations. Ninety-four percent of trainees thought that simulation training could support safe practice, and all trainees considered simulation to be useful for training. Trainees strongly emphasized the importance of simulation training (pre-course vs. post-course median score: 7 vs. 9, p=0.01), the necessity for it to be readily assessable (9 vs. 10, p=0.061), its role in formal assessment (4 vs. 8, p=0.006), and being able to become a better surgeon from it (7 vs. 8, p=0.078). Conclusions T&O trainees acknowledged the value of simulation training in complementing their operating numbers; however, their access to these resources was limited - a problem well recognized in current literature. The gap in the implementation of simulation training should be addressed for T&O trainees to benefit from these resources fully.

Validating low-fidelity arthroscopic simulation in medical students: a feasibility trial

INTRODUCTION

With surgical opportunities becoming increasingly restricted for orthopaedic trainees, simulation training is a valuable alternative at providing sufficient practice. This pilot study aims to assess the potential effectiveness of low-fidelity simulation in teaching medical students basic arthroscopic skills and the feasibility of its incorporation into formal student training programmes.

METHODS

Twenty-two medical students completed pre- and post-training tests on the Probing (Task 1) and Maze (Task 2) exercises from the Sawbones 'Fundamentals of Arthroscopy Surgery Training' (FAST) programme. Training consisted of practising horizon control, deliberate linear motion and probing within 25min over a period of days. Completion time and error frequency were measured. The difference in performance was assessed using a paired two-tailed t-test. Qualitative data were collected.

RESULTS

Test completion time decreased significantly by a mean of 83s (±46s, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 37 to 129) for Task 1 (p=0.001) and 105s (±55s, 95% CI 50 to 160) for Task 2 (p=0.0007). Frequency of direct visualisation errors decreased significantly by a mean of 1.0 errors (±1.0 errors, 95% CI 0.1 to 2.0) for Task 1 (p = 0.04) and 0.8 errors (±0.8 errors, 95% CI 0.1 to 1.6) for Task 2 (p = 0.04). At post-training, 82% of participants were willing to incorporate FAST into formal training.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-fidelity simulators such as FAST can potentially teach basic arthroscopic skills to medical students and are feasible for incorporation into formal training. They also give students a cost-effective and safe basic surgical training experience.

Procedural simulation training in orthopaedics and traumatology: Nationwide survey among surgeon educators and residents in France

BACKGROUND

Simulation is among the tools used in France to train residents specialising in orthopaedic and trauma surgery (OTS). However, implementing simulation-based training (SBT) is complex and poorly reported. The objective of this study was to describe the use of simulation for OTS training in France.

HYPOTHESIS

Nationwide, SBT is not used to its full capacity for teaching OTS in France, and differences in opinions about SBT may exist between surgeon educators and residents.

STUDY DESIGN

Nationwide questionnaire survey in France.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We built two specific self-questionnaires then e-mailed them between December 2020 and February 2021 to the surgeon educators who were members of the national university council and to the residents specialising in OTS during the current academic year. The questions were about the 2018-2019 academic year, before the COVID-19 pandemic. Two classes of residents who were still medical students during this period were not included, leaving three classes for the analysis.

RESULTS

The participation rates were 57% (67/117) for the educators and 24% (87/369) for the three classes of residents. Of the 67 educators, 47 (70%) reported being involved in SBT and identified the university (70%) and industry (53%) as the main funders of this teaching modality. The educators indicated that the mean number of SBT laboratories in their region was 1.4±0.9 (range, 0-4). The main types of simulators were saw bones (77%); cadavers (85%); and commercial simulators (74%), notably for the knee (87%) and shoulder (78%). The educators estimated that they had achieved a mean of 33%±23% (range, 0%-100%) of the teaching objectives set out in the OTS curriculum and that the main obstacles were insufficient funding (81%) and lack of time (67%). Only 21% of educators reported conducting SBT research. The residents reported that they accessed SBT via the OTS teaching module (28/87, 32%), local university degrees (23/87, 26%), their hospital department (17/87, 18%), or the industry (15/87, 17%); 25/87 (29%) had never received SBT. On a 0-10 scale (0, completely disagrees; 10, completely agrees), the mean score for SBT effectiveness was 8.6±2.1 for residents and 7.1±3.0 for educators (p<0.001); the corresponding values for the quality of SBT integration in the region were 1.5±1.8 and 3.8±2.6, respectively (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

SBT is not yet used to its full potential for teaching OTS in France. Insufficient funding and lack of time were identified by the educators as the main obstacles to greater use of SBT. Both the residents and the educators felt that SBT mightbe beneficial for training.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, nationwide survey.

Undergraduate education of trauma and orthopaedic surgery in the UK

Aims

Evidence exists of a consistent decline in the value and time that medical schools place upon their undergraduate orthopaedic placements. This limited exposure to trauma and orthopaedics (T&O) during medical school will be the only experience in the speciality for the majority of doctors. This review aims to provide an overview of undergraduate orthopaedic training in the UK.

Methods

This review summarizes the relevant literature from the last 20 years in the UK. Articles were selected from database searches using MEDLINE, EMBASE, ERIC, Cochrane, and Web of Science. A total of 16 papers met the inclusion criteria.

Results

The length of exposure to T&O is declining; the mean total placement duration of two to three weeks is significantly less than the four- to six-week minimum advised by most relevant sources. The main teaching methods described in the literature included didactic lectures, bedside teaching, and small group case-based discussions. Students preferred interactive, blended learning teaching styles over didactic methods. This improvement in satisfaction was reflected in improvements in student assessment scores. However, studies failed to assess competencies in clinical skills and examinations, which is consistent with the opinions of UK foundation year doctors, approximately 40% of whom report a “poor” understanding of orthopaedics. Furthermore, the majority of UK doctors are not exposed to orthopaedics at the postgraduate level, which only serves to amplify the disparity between junior and generalist knowledge, and the standards expected by senior colleagues and professional bodies.

Conclusion

There is a deficit in undergraduate orthopaedic training within the UK which has only worsened in the last 20 years, leaving medical students and foundation doctors with a potentially significant lack of orthopaedic knowledge.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(7):549–556.

Assessing technical skill in ankle fracture surgery from the postoperative radiograph

Aims

To identify a core outcome set of postoperative radiographic measurements to assess technical skill in ankle fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), and to validate these against Van der Vleuten’s criteria for effective assessment.

Methods

An e-Delphi exercise was undertaken at a major trauma centre (n = 39) to identify relevant parameters. Feasibility was tested by two authors. Reliability and validity was tested using postoperative radiographs of ankle fracture operations performed by trainees enrolled in an educational trial (IRCTN 20431944). To determine construct validity, trainees were divided into novice (performed < ten cases at baseline) and intermediate groups (performed ≥ ten cases at baseline). To assess concurrent validity, the procedure-based assessment (PBA) was considered the gold standard. The inter-rater and intrarater reliability was tested using a randomly selected subset of 25 cases.

Results

Overall, 235 ankle ORIFs were performed by 24 postgraduate year three to five trainees during ten months at nine NHS hospitals in England, UK. Overall, 42 PBAs were completed. The e-Delphi panel identified five ‘final product analysis’ parameters and defined acceptability thresholds: medial clear space (MCS); medial malleolar displacement (MMD); lateral malleolar displacement (LMD); tibiofibular clear space (TFCS) (all in mm); and talocrural angle (TCA) in degrees. Face validity, content validity, and feasibility were excellent. PBA global rating scale scores in this population showed excellent construct validity as continuous (p < 0.001) and categorical (p = 0.001) variables. Concurrent validity of all metrics was poor against PBA score. Intrarater reliability was substantial for all parameters (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.8), and inter-rater reliability was substantial for LMD, MMD, TCA, and moderate (ICC 0.61 to 0.80) for MCS and TFCS. Assessment was time efficient compared to PBA.

Conclusion

Assessment of technical skill in ankle fracture surgery using the first postoperative radiograph satisfies the tested Van der Vleuten’s utility criteria for effective assessment. 'Final product analysis' assessment may be useful to assess skill transfer in the simulation-based research setting. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(6):502–509.

The dawn of a new competency-based training era

The imminent introduction of the new Trauma & Orthopaedic (T&O) curriculum, and the implementation of the Improving Surgical Training initiative, reflect yet another paradigm shift in the recent history of trauma and orthopaedic training. The move to outcome-based training without time constraints is a radical departure from the traditional time-based structure and represents an exciting new training frontier. This paper summarizes the history of T&O training reform, explains the rationale for change, and reflects on lessons learnt from the past.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2-3:181–190.