Magnetically controlled growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis: a single centre experience of 44 patients with mean follow-up of 4.1 years

Reply to Tabeling et al. Comment on "Grabala et al. Radiological Outcomes of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Treatment of Children with Various Etiologies of Early-Onset Scoliosis-A Multicenter Study. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1529"

We are immensely gratified by the considerable interest our study has garnered [...].

Minimally Invasive Controlled Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis-A Surgical Technique Video

BACKGROUND

Spinal deformities in children and adolescents can be easily divided into those occurring and diagnosed before the age of 10-early-onset scoliosis-and those occurring and diagnosed after the age of 10-late-onset scoliosis. When the curvature continues to progress and exceeds a Cobb angle of more than 60-65 degrees, surgical treatment should be considered. The most common treatment procedure for EOS is the surgical correction of the deformity using standard growing rods (SGRs), and in the case of congenital defects with additional hemivertebrae, it is the resection of the hemivertebra and short fusion. Minimally invasive controlled growing rods (MICGRs) need to be distracted every 6-9 months through a minimally invasive approach that involves sedation and neuromonitoring to obtain the best possible correction while minimizing complications. The aim of our study is to present a less-invasive surgical technique for MICGR implantation based on a two-case presentation-early-onset idiopathic scoliosis and congenital kyphosis. The surgical technique is the less-invasive percutaneous and subfascial implantation of MICGRs without long incisions in the back.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MICGRs is an alternative and safe surgical technique for patients undergoing surgical treatment for EOS. Without the risk of metallosis, like in other implant systems, and the need for replacement after 2 years of use, like in using magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), the MICGR system can be used as a less-invasive procedure, allowing for the avoidance of many periodic invasive procedures in children with a wider opening of the spine (like in using standard growing rods), minimizing the number of planned hospitalizations, reducing the length of hospital stays, and reducing the physical and mental burdens on young patients, parents, and families.

Predictors of Rod Length Gain and Sagittal Alignment Change After Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Lengthening

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

There are preoperative characteristics that predict rod lengthening of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). The lengthening of MCGR will lead to increased kyphosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The amount of length gained by MCGR is variable, and predictors are lacking. Similarly, sagittal plane changes over the MCGR lengthening period have not been investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with MCGR and a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified and those with previous spine surgery were excluded. Preimplantation, postimplantation, and last follow-up postlengthening radiographs were examined. Multiple linear regression analyses were used for rod length gain predictors.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with early-onset scoliosis met inclusion criteria: nine idiopathic, five congenital, 14 neuromuscular, 20 syndromic, and eight skeletal dysplasia patients. No difference was seen between subtypes of early-onset scoliosis for rod length gain ( P =0.62). Shorter preoperative T1-T12 height and higher curve correction rate after implantation were significant predictors for rod length gain ( P <0.001). Preoperative major curve magnitude and kyphosis were not significant predictors. Flattening of the spine around the actuator and compensative increase in T1-T5 kyphosis were seen secondarily after MCGR implantation. Maximum sagittal kyphosis, T1-T5 kyphosis, and T5-T12 kyphosis did not change during lengthening. Lumbar lordosis significantly decreased postimplantation (first erect) but then increased during lengthening. Pelvic incidence and sacral slope both increased during lengthening, but this may be age related.

CONCLUSION

Patients who gained the most rod length with MCGR were those with an initially shorter T1-T12 height and better initial curve correction at implantation, likely representing that implants work best in small patients with flexible curves. Diagnosis, preoperative curve magnitude, and thoracic kyphosis were not related to rod length gain. Thoracic kyphosis did not deteriorate over the lengthening phase.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Early-onset Scoliosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this article, we review the most recent advancements in the approaches to EOS diagnosis and assessment, surgical indications and options, and basic science innovation in the space of early-onset scoliosis research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) covers a diverse, heterogeneous range of spinal and chest wall deformities that affect children under 10 years old. Recent efforts have sought to examine the validity and reliability of a recently developed classification system to better standardize the presentation of EOS. There has also been focused attention on developing safer, informative, and readily available imaging and clinical assessment tools, from reduced micro-dose radiographs, quantitative dynamic MRIs, and pulmonary function tests. Basic science innovation in EOS has centered on developing large animal models capable of replicating scoliotic deformity to better evaluate corrective technologies. And given the increased variety in approaches to managing EOS in recent years, there exist few clear guidelines around surgical indications across EOS etiologies. Despite this, over the past two decades, there has been a considerable shift in the spinal implant landscape toward growth-friendly instrumentation, particularly the utilization of MCGR implants. With the advent of new biological and basic science treatments and therapies extending survivorship for disease etiologies associated with EOS, the treatment for EOS has steadily evolved in recent years. With this has come a rising volume and variation in management options for EOS, as well as the need for multidisciplinary and creative approaches to treating patients with these complex and heterogeneous disorders.

Magnetically controlled growing rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of 52 consecutive cases demonstrates improvement of coronal deformity

Background

The purpose of this study was to report the radiographic results and complications of magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) treatment in patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS).

Methods

Patient records and radiographs from a consecutive series of patients treated with MCGR for EOS at two Swedish institutions were reviewed retrospectively. Radiographic analysis included Cobb angle, T1-T12 height, T1-S1 height, thoracic kyphosis, and lung height. Subgroup analyses were performed on primary versus conversion cases and single versus dual rods using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent samples t-test.

Results

Fifty-two cases treated with MCGR (24 single rods, 28 dual rods) were included from local surgical records into this cohort study, 32 primary and 20 converted from other growth friendly surgical treatment. Mean age at MCGR implantation was 7.4 (2.0-14.6) years old in the primary group and 9.3 (5.0-16.1) years old in the converted group. Mean follow-up time was 3.7 (2.0-7.6) years. Mean (standard deviation; SD) Cobb angle of the major curve changed from 62° (17°) preoperatively to 42° (16°) postoperatively to 46° (18°) at final follow-up (P<0.001). Mean (SD) overall thoracic kyphosis changed from 41° (19°) preoperatively to 32° (14°) postoperatively to 39° (17°) at final follow-up (P=0.018). Mean T1-T12 height was 177 mm (34 mm) preoperatively, 183 mm (35 mm) immediate postoperative and 199 mm (35 mm) at final follow-up (P=0.047). The mean T1-T12 height increased significantly in the primary group but not in the converted group. The number of surgeries was 114 (78 planned, 36 unplanned). The rate of unplanned surgeries did not differ significantly between single and dual rods. The total number of complications was 70 of which 38 were implant related. The overall mean complication rate was 1.4 (0-4). There were no significant differences in complication rates between subgroups.

Conclusions

MCGR treatment enabled and maintained correction of spinal deformity while allowing spinal growth. There were no significant differences in complication rates or unplanned surgeries between the groups treated with single or dual rods.

Sublaminar Band Fixation Provides Excellent Anchors for MAGEC Rod Distraction Systems

MAGEC rods (NuVasive) provide distraction growth in early-onset scoliosis. Pedicle screw use with MAGEC rods can lead to anchor failure. Sublaminar bands offer superior fixation points for the MAGEC system while preserving pedicles and facets, avoiding spinal cord injury, and eliminating the need for fluoroscopy. Sublaminar bands can be safely used up to cervical vertebra four (C4), substantially decreasing the risk of complications such as anchor pull-out, rod breakage, and proximal junctional kyphosis that typically occurs with pedicle screws and hooks. This case demonstrates the viable option of sublaminar band fixation as an anchor system for MAGEC rods. This is a retrospective case review of one patient with early-onset scoliosis who underwent multiple osteotomies, spinal cord decompression, and placement of MAGEC rods with sublaminar bands. The patient had successful distraction procedures conducted routinely throughout a 44-month period with no associated implant complications or neurologic sequelae during that period. The patient had achieved maximal distraction with the implanted rods and thereafter underwent removal of the MAGEC rods and replacement implantation with longer MAGEC rods. The purpose of this case review was to demonstrate the superior fixation results provided with sublaminar band fixation for MAGEC rod distraction systems.

Less-Invasive Approach to Early-Onset Scoliosis—Surgical Technique for Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) Based on Treatment of 2-Year-Old Child with Severe Scoliosis

Background: Spinal deformities in children can be caused by various etiologies, such as congenital, syndromic, neuromuscular, or idiopathic. Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is diagnosed before the age of ten years, and when the curvature continues to progress and exceeds a Cobb angle of 60–65 degrees, surgical treatment should be considered. Initial minimally invasive surgery and the implantation of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) allows for the noninvasive distraction of the spine, growing, and avoids multiple operations associated with the classic distractions of standard growing rods. Case presentation: A 2-year-old girl was admitted to our clinic with rapidly progressive thoracic scoliosis. The major curve of the thoracic spine Cobb angle was 122° at 30 months. No congenital deformities were detected. The surgical technique was the less-invasive percutaneous and subfascial implantation of MCGRs, without long incisions on the back and the non-invasive ambulatory lengthening of her spine over the next 4 years. Conclusions: MCGR is a safe procedure for EOS patients. It is extremely effective at correcting spinal deformity; controlling the growth and curvature of the spine as the child develops during growth; reducing the number of hospitalizations and anesthesia; and minimizing the physical and mental burden of young patients, parents, and their families.

Autofusion With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods: A Case Report

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are an effective alternative to traditional growing rods (TGRs) in the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS), with comparable deformity correction despite fewer planned reoperations. This case report presents a unique case of autofusion in a patient with tetraplegic cerebral palsy, thoracic myelomeningocele, and EOS who was treated with dual MCGR instrumentation and underwent serial lengthening procedures for four years. We detail the operative and radiographic findings in a novel case of autofusion encountered after MCGR placement to treat EOS. An eight-year-old female with tetraplegic cerebral palsy causing a 94° right thoracic neuromuscular scoliosis was treated with dual MCGRs; she then underwent serial lengthenings every four months. At 12 years of age, during MCGR explantation and posterior spinal fusion, dense heterotopic autofusion was encountered around the MCGR instrumentation, limiting further deformity correction. The benefits of MCGRs make them an appealing alternative to TGRs for the treatment of EOS. Although the theoretical risk of autofusion in MCGRs is low, recent case reports propose autofusion as a possible reason for MCGRs' failure to lengthen.

Contraindications to magnetically controlled growing rods: consensus among experts in treating early onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to describe contraindications to the magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) by establishing consensus amongst expert surgeons who treat these patients frequently.

METHODS

Nine pediatric spine surgeons from an international EOS study group participated in semi-structured interviews via email to identify factors that influence decision making in the use of MCGR. A 39-question survey was then developed to specify these factors as contraindications for MCGR-these included patient age and size, etiology, medical comorbidities, coronal and sagittal curve profiles, and skin and soft tissue characteristics. Pediatric spine surgeons from the EOS international study group were invited to complete the survey. A second 29-item survey was created to determine details and clarify results from the first survey. Responses were analyzed for consensus (> 70%), near consensus (60-69%), and no consensus/variability (< 60%) for MCGR contraindication.

RESULTS

56 surgeons of 173 invited (32%) completed the first survey, and 64 (37%) completed the second survey. Responders had a mean of over 15 years in practice (range 1-45) with over 6 years of experience with using MCGR (range 2-12). 71.4% of respondents agreed that patient size characteristics should be considered as contraindications, including BMI (81.3%) and spinal height (84.4%), although a specific BMI range or a specific minimum spinal height were not agreed upon. Among surgeons who agreed that skin and soft tissue problems were contraindications (78.6%), insufficient soft tissue (98%) and skin (89%) to cover MCGR were specified. Among surgeons who reported curve stiffness as a contraindication (85.9%), there was agreement that this curve stiffness should be defined by clinical evaluation (78.2%) and by traction films (72.3%). Among surgeons who reported sagittal curve characteristics as contraindications, hyperkyphosis (95.3%) and sagittal curve apex above T3 (70%) were specified. Surgeons who indicated the need for repetitive MRI as a contraindication (79.7%) agreed that image quality (72.9%) and not patient safety (13.6%) was the concern. In the entire cohort, consensus was not achieved on the following factors: patient age (57.4%), medical comorbidities (46.4%), etiology (53.6%), and coronal curve characteristics (58.9%).

CONCLUSION

Surgeon consensus suggests that MCGR should be avoided in patients who have insufficient spinal height to accommodate the MCGR, have potential skin and soft tissue inadequacy, have too stiff a spinal curve, have too much kyphosis, and require repetitive MRI, particularly of the spine. Future data-driven studies using this framework are warranted to generate more specific criteria (e.g. specific degrees of kyphosis) to facilitate clinical decision making for EOS patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V-expert opinion.

Complications of single growing rod constructs in the treatment of severe early-onset scoliosis: a lesson relearned

PURPOSE

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is one of the most challenging areas of orthopedic management. Previous studies have reported that EOS patients were associated with high risk of complications following growth-friendly surgery. This study was performed to evaluate the complications of single traditional growing rods (TGRs) in the treatment of EOS.

METHODS

In a retrospective chart review study, medical records of all EOS patients treated with single TGRs between 2006 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients under the age of 10 at the time of surgery who had at least 24 months of follow-up were included. Intra- and post-operative complications included both device-related and disease-related complications. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients with a mean age of 5.7 ± 2.1 years with the mean follow-up duration of 33.3 ± 9.1 months were included in the final analysis. Of the 35 participants, 27 children (77.1%) experienced at least one complication. A total of 61 complications were observed, giving rise to 1.7 complications per patient. An unplanned surgical procedure was needed to manage 42 of the 61 complications (68.8%). Thirty-five cases of implant failure, 11 cases of deep infection, and 2 cases of junctional kyphosis were identified.

CONCLUSION

It seems that even in the setting that the use of dual TGRs is not possible, the use of single TGRs as the only therapeutic modality should be minimized due to high rate of complications even as a bridge treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

Comparison of surgical interventions for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Several growth-preserving surgical techniques are employed in the management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The authors' objective was to compare the use of traditional growing rods (TGRs), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), Shilla growth guidance techniques, and vertically expanding prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTRs) for the management of EOS.

METHODS

A systematic review of electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane, was performed. Outcomes of interest included correction of Cobb angle, T1-S1 distance, and complication rate, including alignment, hardware failure and infection, and planned and unplanned reoperation rates. The percent changes and 95% CIs were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 67 studies were identified, which included 2021 patients. Of these, 1169 (57.8%) patients underwent operations with TGR, 178 (8.8%) Shilla growth guidance system, 448 (22.2%) MCGR, and 226 (11.1%) VEPTR system. The mean ± SD age of the cohort was 6.9 ± 1.2 years. The authors found that the Shilla technique provided the most significant improvement in coronal Cobb angle immediately after surgery (mean [95% CI] 64.3% [61.4%-67.2%]), whereas VEPTR (27.6% [22.7%-33.6%]) performed significantly worse. VEPTR also performed significantly worse than the other techniques at final follow-up. The techniques also provided comparable gains in T1-S1 height immediately postoperatively (mean [95% CI] 10.7% [8.4%-13.0%]); however, TGR performed better at final follow-up (21.4% [18.7%-24.1%]). Complications were not significantly different among the patients who underwent the Shilla, TGR, MCGR, and VEPTR techniques, except for the rate of infections. The TGR technique had the lowest rate of unplanned reoperations (mean [95% CI] 15% [10%-23%] vs 24% [19%-29%]) but the highest number of planned reoperations per patient (5.31 [4.83-5.82]). The overall certainty was also low, with a high risk of bias across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggested that the Shilla technique was associated with a greater early coronal Cobb angle correction, whereas use of VEPTR was associated with a lower correction rate at any time point. TGR offered the most significant height gain at final follow-up. The complication rates were comparable across all surgical techniques. The optimal surgical approach should be tailored to individual patients, taking into consideration the strengths and limitations of each option.

Titanium wear from magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) for the treatment of spinal deformities in children

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are an effective treatment method for early-onset scoliosis (EOS). In recent years, increasing titanium wear was observed in tissue adjacent to implants and in blood samples of these patients. This study aims to investigate the potential correlation between amount of metal loss and titanium levels in blood during MCGR treatment as well as influencing factors for metal wear. In total, 44 MCGRs (n = 23 patients) were retrieved after an average of 2.6 years of implantation and analyzed using a tactile measurement instrument and subsequent metal loss calculation. Titanium plasma levels (n = 23) were obtained using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The correlation of both parameters as well as influencing factors were analyzed. Titanium abrasion on MCGRs was observed in the majority of implants. There was no correlation of metal implant wear or titanium plasma values to the duration of MCGR implantation time, number of external lengthening procedures, patient’s ambulatory status, gender, weight or height. Material loss on the MCGRs showed a positive correlation to titanium blood plasma values. The present study is one of the first studies to analyze retrieved MCGRs using high-precision metrological techniques and compare these results with ICP-MS analyses determining blood titanium values.

Magnetically controlled growing rods in the management of early onset scoliosis: a systematic review

Background

Early onset scoliosis (EOS) presents in patients younger than 10 years. Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) were developed as an outpatient distraction system for EOS, allowing to avoid multiple surgeries. This systematic review investigated the efficacy and feasibility of MCGR in EOS.

Methods

This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google scholar, Embase, and Scopus were accessed in May 2022. All the clinical trials which investigate the role of MCGR for early onset scoliosis were accessed. Only studies reporting data in patients younger than 10 years with a preoperative Cobb Angle greater than 40° were eligible. The following data was extracted at baseline and at last follow-up: mean kyphosis angle, overall mean Cobb angle, mean T1–S1 length. Data from complication were also collected.

Results

Data from 23 clinical studies (504 patients) were included in the present study. 56% (282 of 504) were females. The average length of the follow-up was 28.9 ± 16.0 months. The mean age of the patients was 8.7 ± 1.9 years old. The mean BMI was 17.7 ± 7.6 kg/m². The mean kyphosis angle had reduced by the last follow-up (P = 0.04), as did the overall mean Cobb angle (P < 0.0001), while the overall T1–S1 length increased (P = 0.0002). Implant-associated complications, followed by spinal alignment failure, wound healing ailments, pulmonary complications, progressive trunk stiffness, persistent back pain, and fracture.

Conclusion

The management of EOS remains challenging. The current evidence indicates that MCGR may be effective to distract the spine and model the curve in EOS.

Current benchtop protocols are not appropriate for the evaluation of distraction-based growing rods: a literature review to justify a new protocol and its development

PURPOSE

Although distraction-based growing rods (GR) are the gold standard for the treatment of early onset scoliosis, they suffer from high failure rates. We have (1) performed a literature search to understand the deficiencies of the current protocols, (2) in vitro evaluation of GRs using our proposed protocol and performed a finite element (FE) model validation, and (3) identified key features which should be considered in mechanical testing setups.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published on (a) in vivo animal, in vitro cadaveric, and biomechanical studies analyzing the use of GRs as well as (b) failure mechanisms and risk factors for GRs. Both FE and benchtop models of a proposed TGR test construct were developed and evaluated for two cases, long tandem connectors (LT), and side-by-side connectors (SBS). The test construct consisted of five polymer blocks representing vertebral bodies, joined with springs to simulate spinal stiffness. The superior and inferior blocks accepted the pedicle screw anchors, while the three middle blocks were floating. After the pedicle screws, rods, and connectors were assembled onto this construct, distraction was performed, mimicking scoliosis surgery. The resulting distracted constructs were then subjected to static compression-bending loading. Yield load and stiffness were calculated and used to verify/validate the FE results.

RESULTS

From the literature search, key features identified as significant were axial and transverse connectors, contoured rods, and distraction, distraction being the most challenging feature to incorporate in testing. The in silico analyses, once they are validated, can be used as a complementing technique to investigate other anatomical features which are not possible in the mechanical setup (like growth/scoliosis curvature). Based on our experiment, the LT constructs showed higher stiffness and yield load compared to SBS (78.85 N/mm vs. 59.68 N/mm and 838.84 N vs. 623.3 N). The FE predictions were in agreement with the experimental outcomes (within 10% difference). The maximum von Mises stresses were predicted adjacent to the distraction site, consistent with the location of observed failures in vivo.

CONCLUSION

The two-way approach presented in this study can lead to a robust prediction of the contributing factors to the in vivo failure.

A comparison of the post-fusion outcome of patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with traditional and magnetically controlled growing rods

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), who had undergone spinal fusion after distraction-based spinal growth modulation using either traditional growing rods (TGRs) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs).

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of skeletally mature patients who had undergone fusion for an EOS, which had been previously treated using either TGRs or MCGRs. Measured outcomes included sequential coronal T1 to S1 height and major curve (Cobb) angle on plain radiographs and any complications requiring unplanned surgery before final fusion.

RESULTS

We reviewed 43 patients (63% female) with a mean age of 6.4 years (SD 2.6) at the index procedure, and 12.2 years (SD 2.2) at final fusion. Their mean follow-up was 8.1 years (SD 3.4). A total of 16 patients were treated with MCGRs and 27 with TGRs. The mean number of distractions was 7.5 in the MCGR group and ten in the TGR group (p = 0.471). The mean interval between distractions was 3.4 months in the MCGR group and 8.6 months in the TGR group (p < 0.001). The mean Cobb angle had improved by 25.1° in the MCGR group and 23.2° in TGR group (p = 0.664) at final follow-up. The mean coronal T1 to S1 height had increased by 16% in the MCGR group and 32.9% in TGR group (p = 0.001), although the mean T1 to S1 height achieved at final follow-up was similar in both. Unplanned operations were needed in 43.8% of the MCGR group and 51.2% of TGR group (p = 0.422).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective, single-centre review, there were no significant differences in major curve correction or gain in spinal height at fusion. Although the number of planned procedures were fewer in patients with MCGRs, the rates of implant-related complications needing unplanned revision surgery were similar in the two groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):257-264.

Matched Comparison of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods with Traditional Growing Rods in Severe Early-Onset Scoliosis of ≥90°: An Interim Report on Outcomes 2 Years After Treatment

BACKGROUND

Severe early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is managed surgically but represents a challenge due to limited implant fixation points, large curve size, and fragile patients with comorbidities. Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) have the advantage of avoiding surgical intervention for routine lengthening, but their ability to address severe EOS has not been studied, to our knowledge.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected international database identified 44 children with severe (≥90°) EOS treated with MCGRs who met our study criteria. Etiology, age, and sex-matched patients treated with traditional growing rods (TGRs) were identified from the same database. Patients were evaluated at a 2-year follow-up. No patients with vertically expandable prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTRs) were included. The health-related quality of life was evaluated with the 24-Item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24).

RESULTS

The mean preoperative major coronal curve was 104° in the MCGR group and 104° in the TGR group. At the 2-year follow-up, the mean major coronal curves were 52° and 66° (p = 0.001), respectively. The mean T1-T12 heights were 155 mm and 152 mm preoperatively and 202 mm and 192 mm at the 2-year follow-up (p = 0.088). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 2-year unplanned-revision-free survival was 91% in the MCGR group and 71% in the TGR group (p < 0.005). The 2-year score in the EOSQ-24 pulmonary function domain was better in the MCGR group. There were no other significant differences in the EOSQ-24 scores between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MCGRs for severe EOS provided significantly better major curve correction with significantly fewer unplanned revisions than TGRs at a 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering versus Spinal Fusion in Idiopathic Scoliosis from a US Integrated Healthcare Delivery System Perspective

Purpose

Anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) is a non-fusion, minimally invasive, growth-modulating procedure with some early positive clinical outcomes reported in pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS). VBT offers potential health-related quality of life (HRQoL) benefits over spinal fusion in allowing patients to retain a greater range of motion after surgery. We conducted an early cost-utility analysis (CUA) to compare VBT with fusion as a first-choice surgical treatment for skeletally immature patients (age >10 years) with moderate to severe IS, who have failed nonoperative management, from a US integrated healthcare delivery system perspective.

Patients and Methods

The CUA uses a Markov state transition model, capturing a 15-year period following index surgery. Transition probabilities, including revision risk and subsequent fusion, were based on published surgical outcomes and an ongoing VBT observational study (NCT02897453). Patients were assigned utilities derived from published patient-reported outcomes (PROs; SRS-22r mapped to EQ-5D) following fusion and the above VBT study. Index and revision procedure costs were included. Probabilistic (PSA) and deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) were performed.

Results

VBT was associated with higher costs but also higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) than fusion (incremental costs: $45,546; QALYs gained: 0.54). The subsequent incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for VBT vs fusion was $84,391/QALY gained. Mean PSA results were similar to the base case, indicating that results were generally robust to uncertainty. The DSA indicated that results were most sensitive to variations in utility values.

Conclusion

This is the first CUA comparing VBT with fusion in pediatric patients with IS and suggests that VBT may be a cost-effective alternative to fusion in the US, given recommended willingness-to-pay thresholds ($100,000–$150,000). The results rely on HRQoL benefits for VBT compared with fusion. For improved model accuracy, further analyses with longer-term PROs for VBT, and comparative effectiveness studies, would be needed.