Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional dressings following soft-tissue sarcoma excision: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Development and validation of a nomogram to predict surgical site infection after soft-tissue sarcoma resection

Aims

Surgical site infection (SSI) after soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) resection is a serious complication. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the risk factors for SSI after STS resection, and to develop a nomogram that allows patient-specific risk assessment.

Methods

A total of 547 patients with STS who underwent tumour resection between 2005 and 2021 were divided into a development cohort and a validation cohort. In the development cohort of 402 patients, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used to screen possible risk factors of SSI. To select risk factors and construct the prediction nomogram, multivariate logistic regression was used. The predictive power of the nomogram was evaluated by receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis in the validation cohort of 145 patients.

Results

LASSO regression analysis selected possible risk factors for SSI, including age, diabetes, operating time, skin graft or flap, resected tumour size, smoking, and radiation therapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, diabetes, smoking during the previous year, operating time, and radiation therapy were independent risk factors for SSI. A nomogram was developed based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis. In the development cohort, the incidence of SSI was 4.5% in the low-risk group (risk score < 6.89) and 26.6% in the high-risk group (risk score ≥ 6.89; p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, the incidence of SSI was 2.0% in the low-risk group and 15.9% in the high-risk group (p = 0.004).

Conclusion

Our nomogram will enable surgeons to assess the risk of SSI in patients with STS. In patients with high risk of SSI, frequent monitoring and aggressive interventions should be considered to prevent this.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Negative Wound Pressure Therapy Use in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection

Background

Negative wound pressure therapy (NWPT) may reduce the wound complication (WC) risk in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and is often utilized for large and/or irradiated wounds, extensive dissections, or wounds at risk of impaired drainage. However, data on WCs after NWPT in STS are lacking. This study systematically reviewed the available literature on NWPT in STS.

Methods

A query of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1976-2022), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE (1946-2022), Scopus, and PubMed (1964-2022) was performed. Eight studies met inclusion.

Results

One-hundred eighty-six cases were analyzed. Among studies with available data, myxofibrosarcoma (n=32/131; 24.4%) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n=29/131; 22.1%) were the most common subtypes, 83.3% (n=90/108) were lower extremity STS, and 51.9% (n=82/158) were preoperatively irradiated. The overall WC rate was 10.8% (n=20/186). Pooled-analysis (three studies) demonstrated a lower WC risk with NWPT versus conventional dressings (OR, 0.133; 95% CI, 0.050-0.351; p<0.001; I2=0%). Subsequent analysis (two studies) found no increased local recurrence risk versus conventional dressings (OR, 1.019; 95% CI, 0.125-8.321; p=0.99), with high heterogeneity.

Conclusion

NWPT appears to lower the WC risk in STS without increasing the recurrence risk, and may be suitable for primary, recurrent, or positive margin resections, staged reconstructions, and while awaiting histologic margin assessment. However, larger, randomized-controlled trials of NWPT in STS are warranted. Level of Evidence: III.

Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) to minimize wound-related complications in lower limb reconstruction after bone tumor resection: preliminary proof-of-concept study

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of postoperative closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) and conventional dressings in wound-related complications after bone tumor resection and reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 50 patients with bone tumors and clinical indication for wide resection and reconstruction were included and divided into two groups (A and B). Bone defect reconstructions were achieved with modular endoprosthesis or biologic techniques, mainly involving allografts with free vascularized fibula. Group A received ciNPWT, and Group B conventional dressings. Wound-related complications, including wound dehiscence, persistent wound leakage, surgical site infections (SSIs), and causes for surgical revision, were assessed.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included in Group A and 31 in Group B. No significant differences were found between groups regarding epidemiologic and clinical presentation features, contrarily to reconstructive options, which were significantly different between both (Fisher = 10,100; p = 0.005). Additionally, Group A presented lower wound dehiscence rate (0 vs. 19.4%; χ2(1) = 4.179; p = 0.041), SSI rate (0 vs. 19.4%; χ2(1) = 4.179; p = 0.041), and surgical revision rate (5.3% vs. 32.3%; χ2(1) = 5.003; p = 0.025) compared to Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study reporting the impact of ciNPWT after bone tumor resection and reconstruction, and its results support a potential role for this technique in diminishing postoperative wound complications and SSIs. A multicentric randomized controlled trial may help clarify the role and impact of ciNPWT after bone tumor resection and reconstruction.

Incisional negative pressure wound therapy for the prevention of surgical site infection: an up-to-date meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Background

The evidence on prophylactic use of negative pressure wound therapy on primary closed incisional wounds (iNPWT) for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI) is confusing and ambiguous. Implementation in daily practice is impaired by inconsistent recommendations in current international guidelines and published meta-analyses. More recently, multiple new randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been published. We aimed to provide an overview of all meta-analyses and their characteristics; to conduct a new and up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment; and to explore the additive value of new RCTs with a trial sequential analysis (TSA).

Methods

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from database inception to October 24, 2022. We identified existing meta-analyses covering all surgical specialties and RCTs studying the effect of iNPWT compared with standard dressings in all types of surgery on the incidence of SSI, wound dehiscence, reoperation, seroma, hematoma, mortality, readmission rate, skin blistering, skin necrosis, pain, and adverse effects of the intervention. We calculated relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. We assessed publication bias with a comparison-adjusted funnel plot. TSA was used to assess the risk of random error. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 (RoB2) tool and GRADE approach. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022312995.

Findings

We identified eight previously published general meta-analyses investigating iNPWT and compared their results to present meta-analysis. For the updated systematic review, 57 RCTs with 13,744 patients were included in the quantitative analysis for SSI, yielding a RR of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.59-0.76, I2 = 21%) for iNPWT compared with standard dressing. Certainty of evidence was high. Compared with previous meta-analyses, the RR stabilised, and the confidence interval narrowed. In the TSA, the cumulative Z-curve crossed the trial sequential monitoring boundary for benefit, confirming the robustness of the summary effect estimate from the meta-analysis.

Interpretation

In this up-to-date meta-analysis, GRADE assessment shows high-certainty evidence that iNPWT is effective in reducing SSI, and uncertainty is less than in previous meta-analyses. TSA indicated that further trials are unlikely to change the effect estimate for the outcome SSI; therefore, if future research is to be conducted on iNPWT, it is crucial to consider what the findings will contribute to the existing robust evidence.

Funding

Dutch Association for Quality Funds Medical Specialists.

Effectiveness of prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy in stopping surgical site wound problems for closed incisions in breast cancer surgery: A meta-analysis

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy in stopping surgical site wound problems for closed incisions in breast cancer surgery. A systematic literature search up to April 2022 was performed and 2223 women with closed incisions in breast cancer surgery at the baseline of the studies; 964 of them were using the prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy, and 1259 were using standard dressings. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the effect of prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy in stopping surgical site wound problems for closed incisions in breast cancer surgery using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. The prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy women had a significantly lower total wound problems (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.90, P = .01), lower surgical site wound infection (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.36-0.96, P = .03), lower wound dehiscence (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.39-0.75, P < .001) and lower wound necrosis (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.71, P < .001), in women with closed incisions in breast cancer surgery compared with standard dressings. However, prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy did not show any significant difference in wound seroma (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.32-1.65, P = .45), and hematoma (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.33-1.59, P = .001) compared with standard dressings in women with closed incisions in breast cancer surgery. The prophylactic application of negative pressure wound therapy women had a significantly lower total wound problems, surgical site wound infection, wound dehiscence, and wound necrosis and no significant difference in wound seroma, and hematoma compared with standard dressings in women with closed incisions in breast cancer surgery. The analysis of outcomes should be with caution because of the low sample size of 5 out of 12 studies in the meta-analysis and a low number of studies in certain comparisons.