Development of a core outcome set for idiopathic clubfoot management

The Impact of Living with Clubfoot on Children and Their Families: Perspectives from Two Cultural Environments

Purpose

To study the physical, emotional and social impact of clubfoot on the lives of affected children and their families.

Methods

A purposive sample of children with treated idiopathic clubfoot and their parents was recruited from two geographical locations-the United Kingdom (UK) and India. Children were divided into age groups of 5-7 and 8-11 years. Questionnaires were administered separately to children and parents; the former comprised multiple-choice questions scored using an 'emoji' system, and the latter included open-ended questions divided into pre-defined themes of daily limitations, social life, general health, emotional barriers and family impact.

Results

Thirty-four children and parents participated from UK; 96 children and parents participated from India. The majority of children (> 80%) reported no problems in daily activities, although 32.8% reported having pain. Difficulty finding appropriate footwear and limitation in sports were more common among UK children, whereas difficulty in squatting was more problematic for Indian children. Self and emotional perceptions regarding their appearance/condition were lower among older as compared to younger children in both countries. Parents' responses mirrored those of children; additionally they reported emotional and financial difficulties during initial treatment phase, and ongoing concerns about the future during the maintenance phase.

Conclusion

Treated clubfoot continues to impact the lives of affected children and families. Perceptions of the condition and its impact vary between population groups; this needs to be appreciated when collecting and analysing outcomes.

The outcomes of idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus : a core outcome set for research and treatment

Aims

To identify the minimum set of outcomes that should be collected in clinical practice and reported in research related to the care of children with idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV).

Methods

A list of outcome measurement tools (OMTs) was obtained from the literature through a systematic review. Further outcomes were collected from patients and families through a questionnaire and interview process. The combined list, as well as the appropriate follow-up timepoint, was rated for importance in a two-round Delphi process that included an international group of orthopaedic surgeons, physiotherapists, nurse practitioners, patients, and families. Outcomes that reached no consensus during the Delphi process were further discussed and scored for inclusion/exclusion in a final consensus meeting involving international stakeholder representatives of practitioners, families, and patient charities.

Results

In total, 39 OMTs were included from the systematic review. Two additional OMTs were identified from the interviews and questionnaires, and four were added after round one Delphi. Overall, 22 OMTs reached ‘consensus in’ during the Delphi and two reached ‘consensus out’; 21 OMTs reached ‘no consensus’ and were included in the final consensus meeting. In all, 21 participants attended the consensus meeting, including a wide diversity of clubfoot practitioners, parent/patient representative, and an independent chair. A total of 21 outcomes were discussed and voted upon; six were voted ‘in’ and 15 were voted ‘out’. The final COS document includes nine OMTs and two existing outcome scores with a total of 31 outcome parameters to be collected after a minimum follow-up of five years. It incorporates static and dynamic clinical findings, patient-reported outcome measures, and a definition of CTEV relapse.

Conclusion

We have defined a minimum set of outcomes to draw comparisons between centres and studies in the treatment of CTEV. With the use of these outcomes, we hope to allow more meaningful research and a better clinical management of CTEV.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(1):98–106.

Early developmental milestones in patients with idiopathic clubfoot treated by Ponseti method

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic clubfoot, also referred to as congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), is one of the most common lower limb deformities observed in newborns, leading to significant functional impairment if untreated. The aims of this study were to (1) assess the developmental milestones in patients with CTEV treated by the Ponseti technique, and to compare them to the unaffected controls; (2) evaluate the possible correlation between developmental milestones, severity of the deformity, and number of casts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-nine subjects were divided into two groups, CTEV group (43 patients; 72 feet) and control group (36 patients). Age, sex, affected side, attainment of babbles (BAL), independent gait (IG), and combined word (CW) were recorded for all patients. In patients with CTEV, Pirani Score (PRS), number of casts (NC), and clinical outcome were collected according to the Clubfoot Assessment Protocol (CAP), The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), and Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI).

RESULTS

IG was achieved later later than the unaffected controls by 12/43 patients (27.9%) with CTEV and 3/36 patients in the control group (8.3%) (p = 0.04) and in a mean time of 16.8 ± 3.5 months and 13.2 ± 2.7 months, respectively (p = 0.001). In the CTEV group the mean value of CAP was 98.6 ± 4.7, of AOFAS of 98.4 ± 4.4 and of FADI equal to 99.9 ± 0.44. There were no statistically significant differences for BAL and CW; and no correlation with PRS, NC, or clinical score were identified.

CONCLUSION

CTEV patients managed by the Ponseti technique achieve independent gait later than the unaffected controls, although they do so within the age limit of developmental. On the other hand, the Ponseti treatment has no impact on attainment of language development.

Development of a core outcome set for the orthopaedic management of spinal dysraphism

Aims

The aim of this study is to define a core outcome set (COS) to allow consistency in outcome reporting amongst studies investigating the management of orthopaedic treatment in children with spinal dysraphism (SD).

Methods

Relevant outcomes will be identified in a four-stage process from both the literature and key stakeholders (patients, their families, and clinical professionals). Previous outcomes used in clinical studies will be identified through a systematic review of the literature, and each outcome will be assigned to one of the five core areas, defined by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT). Additional possible outcomes will be identified through consultation with patients affected by SD and their families.

Results

Outcomes identified in these stages will be included in a two-round Delphi process that will involve key stakeholders in the management of SD. A final list including the identified outcomes will then be summarized in a consensus meeting attended by representatives of the key stakeholders groups.

Conclusion

The best approach to provision of orthopaedic care in patients with SD is yet to be decided. The reporting of different outcomes to define success among studies, often based on personal preferences and local culture, has made it difficult to compare the effect of treatments for this condition. The development of a COS for orthopaedic management in SD will enable meaningful reporting and facilitate comparisons in future clinical trials, thereby assisting complex decision-making in the clinical management of these children.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(1):54–60.