Undergraduate education of trauma and orthopaedic surgery in the UK

Undergraduate deficits in plastic surgery exposure and awareness of the specialty: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Plastic surgery is an important specialty that involves widespread medical knowledge, some of which is taught in undergraduate curricula. The General Medical Council provides a well-defined plastic surgery curriculum for postgraduate training. However, there is no consensus on the provision for undergraduates in this specialty, potentially giving rise to a deficit in undergraduate medical education and a suboptimal basis for plastic surgery postgraduate training. Our aim was to identify the gap in undergraduate plastic surgery teaching and to understand student perceptions of the specialty as well as any trialled interventions.

METHODS

A prospectively registered systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The MEDLINE®, Embase™, PubMed® and Google Scholar™ databases were searched for literature relating to undergraduate exposure to plastic surgery and relevant teaching interventions. Ten studies were included in this review, categorised into three main themes: exposure during medical school, determining factors and perceptions for pursuing a plastic surgery career, and teaching interventions.

RESULTS

Surveys assessing medical student perceptions indicate a significant deficit in exposure to plastic surgery in the undergraduate curriculum. Medical students' interest in the specialty is affected by multiple factors, including the amount of surgical exposure in medical school. Interventions to address the deficit mostly involve one-day courses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the literature is currently limited, studies are needed to effectively assess the outcomes of plastic surgery teaching methods in undergraduate training. Moreover, there is a need for consensus around the provision of undergraduate teaching in plastic surgery. This should be reflected in the latest undergraduate curricula in medical education.

Oral and maxillofacial surgery and dental health education in undergraduate medicine: a systematic review

Undergraduates in medicine should receive a basic education to ensure understanding of dental concepts, including oral cancer, basic dental health advice, and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS). This review aims to explore the exposure of OMFS and dental education in the UK medical undergraduate curriculum and follows PRISMA protocols. Four databases were used to search for literature: MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. A three-tier reviewer panel was used to appropriately evaluate data. The Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI) was used to assess research quality amongst the included literature. A total of 14 papers were included for review. Surveys assessing medical students' perceptions of OMFS education indicate a need for improvement of the speciality in undergraduate medicine. Mean exposure of graduating medical students to OMFS was 22% (95%CI 11 to 29%). Knowledge of relevant anatomy, physiology, and OMFS-related data was very poor across all surveys. Likewise, oral cancer teaching appears to have room for improvement, only 7% (95%CI 4.1 to 10.3%) of final year medical students can identify oral cancer and less than 20% felt confident in oral assessment and diagnosis. This appears to transfer over into postgraduate medicine where only a mean of 22% of general practitioners can correctly diagnose oral cancer. The results of this review indicate that OMFS and oral cancer are not well covered in the medical curriculum. Doctors require a basic understanding of the OMFS speciality for appropriate referrals and clinical management. Furthermore, the ability of doctors to correctly deal with oral medical problems should be improved to optimise patient outcomes.

Tips from the shop floor: postgraduate doctors working in trauma and orthopaedics

Trauma and orthopaedics is a useful rotation for junior doctors to undertake. Experience in the specialty allows doctors to feel more confident in the diagnosis and treatment of conditions affecting the entire musculoskeletal system. Many junior doctors cover on-calls in trauma and orthopaedics departments, often with no prior specialist experience. This article provides junior doctors with up-to-date information about how to prepare for a placement in trauma and orthopaedics, as well as helpful resources for those interested in a career in trauma and orthopaedics.

Undergraduate teaching of surgical skills in the UK: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Students must be proficient in surgical skills according to General Medical Council and Royal College of Surgeons of England guidelines. If these skills are not appropriately taught, there is a risk of an incoming junior workforce with inadequate surgical skills. This paper aimed to review the literature relating to undergraduate teaching of surgical skills in the UK and summarize future suggested training methods.

METHODS

The databases MEDLINE, Embase and SCOPUS were searched, and the existing literature relating to methodology of undergraduate teaching of surgical skills in the UK over the past 10 years was summarized. The Medical Education Research Quality Instrument was used to assess research quality.

RESULTS

A total of 19 papers were included. Cross-sectional evaluations and survey-based studies highlight a clear deficit in surgical skills teaching in the UK. Medical students are currently unable to fulfil their own learning needs and meet requirements set out by the General Medical Council. This lack of surgical teaching appears to negatively affect student desire to pursue a surgical career. The three main themes for improvement are extracurricular surgical skills days, near-peer teaching and simulation. Each method appeared to improve learning, although no studies utilized medium- to long-term follow-up to demonstrate efficacy and there lacks a clear consensus as to the 'standard' of undergraduate surgical skill education. There was also potential for selection bias and response shift bias in many of the studies assessing pre- and postintervention confidence and opinions.

CONCLUSION

There is a concerning lack of surgical skills teaching that has resulted in medical students and junior doctors not having the necessary surgical skills as per General Medical Council guidance and students feel that their own learning needs are not met. This failure to address the learning deficit may be responsible for the fall in surgical competition ratios. While surgical skills teaching must be improved urgently, more robust evidence is required to evaluate the optimal ways of approaching this issue.