Military general surgical training opportunities on operations in Afghanistan

Plastic and Maxillofacial Training for War-Zones - A Systematic Review

Study Design

Injuries sustained in war-zones are variable and constantly developing according to the nature of the ongoing conflict. Soft tissue involvement of the extremities, head and neck often necessitates reconstructive expertise. However, current training to manage injuries in such settings is heterogenous. This study involves a systematic review.

Objective

To evaluate interventions in place to train Plastic and Maxillofacial surgeons for war-zone environments so that limitations to current training can be addressed.

Methods

A literature search of Medline and EMBase was performed using terms relevant to Plastic and Maxillofacial surgery training and war-zone environments. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were scored then educational interventions described in included literature were categorised according to their length, delivery style and training environment. Between-group ANOVA was performed to compare training strategies.

Results

2055 citations were identified through this literature search. Thirty-three studies were included in this analysis. The highest scoring interventions were over an extended time-frame with an action-oriented training approach, using simulation or actual patients. Core competencies addressed by these strategies included technical and non-technical skills necessary when working in war-zone type settings.

Conclusions

Surgical rotations in trauma centers and areas of civil strife, together with didactic courses are valuable strategies to train surgeons for war-zones. These opportunities must be readily available globally and be targeted to the surgical needs of the local population, anticipating the types of combat injuries that often occur in these environments.

Clinical utilization of deployed military surgeons

BACKGROUND

Combat casualty care has been shaped by the prolonged conflicts in Southwest Asia, namely Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. The utilization of surgeons in austere locations outside of Southwest Asia and its implication on skill retention and value have not been examined. This study hypothesizes that surgeon utilization is low in the African theater. This lack of activity is potentially damaging to surgical skill retention and patient care.

METHODS

Military case logs of surgeons deployed to Africa under command of Special Operations Command Africa between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020, were examined. Cases were organized based on population served, general type of procedure, current procedural terminology codes, and location.

RESULTS

Twenty deployment caseloads representing 74% of the deployments during the period were analyzed. In 3,294 days, 101 operations were performed, which included 45 on combat/terrorism related injuries and 19 on US personnel. East and West African deployments, combat, and noncombat zones, respectively, were compared. East Africa averaged 4.1 ± 3.8 operations per deployment, and West Africa, 7.3 ± 8.0 (p = 0.2434). In East Africa, 56.1% of total operations were related to combat/terrorism, compared with 29.6% of total operations in West Africa (p = 0.0077). West Africa had a significantly higher proportion of elective (p = 0.0002) and humanitarian cases (p = <0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Surgical cases for military surgeons were uncommon in Africa. The low volumes have implications for skill retention, morale, and sustainability of military surgical end strength. Reduction in deployment lengths, deployment location adjustments, and/or skill retention strategies are required to ensure clinical peak performance and operational readiness. Failure to implement changes to current practices to optimize surgeon experience will likely decrease surgical readiness and could contribute to decreased retention of deployable military surgeons to support global operations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic/decision, level III.

Train for the Game: What Is the Learning Environment of Deployed Navy Emergency Medicine Physicians?

OBJECTIVES

Medicine is a practice characterized by ongoing learning, and unique qualities of the operational learning environment (LE) may affect learner needs. When physicians move between differing practice environments learners may encounter situations for which they are unprepared. Using a conceptual framework specific to the LE, we therefore asked the following research question: what is the difference in LE for Navy emergency medicine (EM) physicians who practice in U.S. hospitals but serve an operational environment, and how do these differences shape their learning needs?

METHODS

We interviewed Navy EM physicians who recently deployed to explore their perceptions of the deployed LE, how it differed from the LE they practice in stateside, and the perceived effect this difference had on their learning needs. We used the constant comparative method to gather and analyze data until thematic saturation was achieved.

RESULTS

We interviewed 12 physicians and identified six interconnected themes consistent with the LE framework in the literature: 1) patient care is central to the learning experience; 2) professional isolation versus connectedness; 3) a sense of meaningful practice engages the learner in the LE; 4) physicians as educators shape the LE; 5) team trust impacts the LE; and 6) the larger military organization impacts the LE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our themes span the conceptual framework put forth by previous work and did not find themes outside this framework. These interconnected themes describe the difference in LE between the stateside and deployed setting and impact the learning needs of Navy EM physicians. These results inform strategies to position the deployed medical unit for success.

Blunt Abdominal Trauma in a European Trauma Setting: Need for Complex or Non-Complex Skills in Emergency Laparotomy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Blunt abdominal trauma can lead to substantial organ injury and hemorrhage necessitating open abdominal surgery. Currently, the trend in surgeon training is shifting away from general surgery and the surgical treatment of blunt abdominal trauma patients is often done by sub-specialized surgeons. The aim of this study was to identify what emergency procedures are needed after blunt abdominal trauma and whether they can be performed with the skill set of a general surgeon.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of blunt abdominal trauma patients requiring emergency laparotomy (n = 100) over the period 2006-2016 (Helsinki University Hospital Trauma Registry) were reviewed. The organ injuries and the complexity of the procedures were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients (no need for complex skills, NCS) were treated with the skill set of general surgeons while 11 patients required complex skills. Complex skills patients were more severely injured (New Injury Severity Score 56.4 vs 35.9, p < 0.001) and had a lower systolic blood pressure (mean: 89 vs 112, p = 0.044) and higher mean shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure: 1.43 vs 0.95, p = 0.012) on admission compared with NCS patients. The top three NCS procedures were splenectomy (n = 33), bowel repair (n = 31), and urinary bladder repair (n = 16). In patients requiring a complex procedure (CS), the bleeding site was the liver (n = 7) or a major blood vessel (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients requiring emergency laparotomy can be managed with the skills of a general surgeon. Non-responder blunt abdominal trauma patients with positive ultrasound are highly likely to require complex skills. The future training of surgeons should concentrate on NCS procedures while at the same time recognizing those injuries requiring complex skills.

Skill sets required for the management of military head, face and neck trauma: a multidisciplinary consensus statement

Introduction

The evolution of medical practice is resulting in increasing subspecialisation, with head, face and neck (HFN) trauma in a civilian environment usually managed by a combination of surgical specialties working as a team. However, the full combination of HFN specialties commonly available in the NHS may not be available in future UK military-led operations, necessitating the identification of a group of skill sets that could be delivered by one or more deployed surgeons.

Method

A systematic review was undertaken to identify those surgical procedures performed to treat acute military head, face, neck and eye trauma. A multidisciplinary consensus group was convened following this with military HFN trauma expertise to define those procedures commonly required to conduct deployed, in-theatre HFN surgical combat trauma management.

Results

Head, face, neck and eye damage control surgical procedures were identified as comprising surgical cricothyroidotomy, cervico-facial haemorrhage control and decompression of orbital haemorrhage through lateral canthotomy. Acute in-theatre surgical skills required within 24 hours consist of wound debridement, surgical tracheostomy, decompressive craniectomy, intracranial pressure monitor placement, temporary facial fracture stabilisation for airway management or haemorrhage control and primary globe repair. Delayed in-theatre procedures required within 5 days prior to predicted evacuation encompass facial fracture fixation, delayed lateral canthotomy, evisceration, enucleation and eyelid repair.

Conclusions

The identification of those skill sets required for deployment is in keeping with the General Medical Council’s current drive towards credentialing consultants, by which a consultant surgeon’s capabilities in particular practice areas would be defined. Limited opportunities currently exist for trainees and consultants to gain experience in the management of traumatic head, face, neck and eye injuries seen in a kinetic combat environment. Predeployment training requires that the surgical techniques described in this paper are covered and should form the curriculum of future military-specific surgical fellowships. Relevant continued professional development will be necessary to maintain required clinical competency.

Preparing Japanese surgeons for potential mass casualty situations will require innovative and systematic programs

INTRODUCTION

The ongoing state of global geo-political instability means that it is prudent to prepare civilian surgeons to manage major military-type trauma. Japan has enjoyed a prolonged period of peace and consequently it is unlikely that surgeons will have been exposed to a sufficient volume of cases. This study reviews the state of trauma training and preparedness in Japan and reviews the trauma workload of a major Japanese emergency medical center and compared with a major South African trauma center with the intention of quantifying and comparing the time needed to gain adequate exposure to major trauma at the two centers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The literature describing the surgical burden from a number of recent military missions was reviewed and the core surgical skills to manage military-type injuries were identified. We then went on to review all patients admitted to both Kurashiki Central Hospital (KCH) and Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service (PMTS) following trauma between the period September 2015 and August 2016. The burden of trauma at each center was quantified and the number of core surgical competencies or procedures performed at each center was then reviewed. These were then compared with the number of the core procedures which were performed on the reported military missions.

RESULTS

Three reports on military surgical missions were reviewed. These came from the Dutch, French and British military surgical services. The average number of each core procedures performed on each reported military surgery mission are tabulated in the text. The most common procedures were wound debridement and orthopedic fixation, followed by trauma laparotomy, neck exploration and thoracotomy. During the 12 month study period, 309 trauma patients were admitted to KCH. Of which 206 (67%) were male, and the mean age was 57 years. There were 10 penetrating injuries and 299 blunt injuries. Of the penetrating injuries there were no gunshot wounds. The mechanisms of injury for blunt trauma were as follows: Road traffic accidents (RTAs); 141 (47%), fall; 136 (46%) and other injuries; 22 (7%). In the same period, 2887 trauma patients were admitted by the PMTS. There were 1244 cases (43%) of penetrating trauma and 1644 cases (57%) of blunt trauma in PMTS. The mechanisms of injury for penetrating trauma were as follows: stab wounds (SWs); 955 (77%), gunshot wounds (GSWs); 252 (20%), and other injuries; 37 (3%) and for blunt trauma were as follows: assault; 739 (45%), RTAs; 669 (41%), fall; 166 (10%), and other injuries; 70 (4%). The exposure to all the key competencies required to manage trauma is overwhelmingly greater in South Africa than in Japan. The length of time needed to obtain an equivalent trauma exposure to that achieved in South Africa, working in Japan is prohibitively long.

CONCLUSION

Trauma training in Japan is hamstrung by a lack of clinical material as well as by systematic factors. Training a trauma surgeon is difficult. Developing a trauma system in the country may help address some of these deficits. South Africa in contrast has a huge burden of trauma and sufficient infrastructure to ensure that surgeons working there have adequate exposure to major trauma. Developing an academic exchange program between Japan and South Africa may allow for the transfer of trauma experience and skills between the two countries.

Surgical challenges in a new theater of modern warfare: The French role 2 in Gao, Mali

INTRODUCTION

On January 11th 2013, France launched Operation Serval in Mali following Resolution 2085 of the Security Council of the United Nations. Between January and March 2013, more than 4000 French soldiers were deployed to support the Malian National Army and the African Armed Forces.

METHODS

All of the patients who had surgery during Operation Serval were entered into a computerised database. Patients' demographic data (age, sex, status) and types of performed surgical procedures (specialties, injury mechanisms) were recorded.

RESULTS

268 patients were operated on in Gao's Role 2 with a total of 296 surgeries. Among those operated on, 40% were Malian civilians, 24% were French soldiers, and 36% were soldiers of the International Coalition Forces. The majority of the surgeries were orthopaedic, and visceral surgeries were common as well, representing 43% of the total surgeries. Specialised surgical procedures including neurosurgery, thoracic, and vascular surgery were also performed. Forty percent of the surgeries were scheduled. War-related traumatic surgeries represented 22% of the surgical procedures, with non-war related surgeries and non-trauma emergency surgeries making up the rest.

CONCLUSION

this analysis confirms the specific characteristic of asymmetric warfare that it results in a relatively reduced number of war-related casualties. Forward surgical teams have to deal with a wide range of injuries requiring several surgical specialties. Surgeries dedicated to medical aid provided to the population also represented an important part of the surgical activity. Because of the diversity and the technicality of the surgical procedures in Role 2, surgeons had to be trained in war surgery covering all of the surgical specialties, while they maintained their specific skills. In France in 2007, the French Military Health Service Academy (École du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France) offered an advanced course in surgery for deployment in combat zones, with a special focus on damage control surgeries and the management of mass casualties incidents.

French surgical experience in the role 3 medical treatment facility of KaIA (Kabul International Airport, Afghanistan): the place of the orthopedic surgery

INTRODUCTION

In 2009, the French took command of the Medical Hospital (MH) or Role 3 Hospital at KaIA (Kabul International Airport) within the framework of its role in the military mission Operation Pamir in Afghanistan. The goal of this study was to analyze the volume of orthopedic surgical activity for the last four years, to identify its specificities and to improve training of military orthopedic surgeons.

HYPOTHESIS

Orthopedic surgery is the most important activity in the field and surgeons must adapt to situations and injuries that are different from those encountered in France.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients operated on between July 2009 and June 2013 were prospectively included in an electronic database. The analysis included the number of surgical acts and patients, the types of injuries and the surgical procedures.

RESULTS

Forty-three percent (n=1875) of 4318 procedures involved orthopedic surgery. Half of these were emergencies. French military personnel represented 17% of the patients, local civilians 47% and children 17%. Half of the procedures involved the soft tissues, 20% were for bone fixation and 10% for surgery of the hand. The rate of amputation was 6%. The diversity of the surgical acts was high ranging from emergency surgery to surgical reconstruction.

DISCUSSION

The activity of this Role 3 facility is comparable to that of other Role 3 facilities in Afghanistan, with an important percentage of acts involving medical assistance to the local population and scheduled surgeries as well as primary and/or secondary management of the wounded. The diversity of surgical acts confirms the challenge of training military orthopedic surgeons within the context of the hyperspecialization of the civilian sector. Specific training has been organized in France by the École du Val de Grâce. Specific continuing education is also necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (retrospective review).