Radiation risk from fluoroscopically-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

All-inside posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A systematic review of current practice

Purpose

The All-Inside PCL Reconstruction is a surgical technique which overcomes some of the key challenges faced with traditional PCL Reconstruction, and is becoming more relevant as the rate of PCL reconstruction increases.The purpose of this study is to review the technical practices of the all-inside PCL reconstruction since it was first introduced, with respect to the various key components involved in the surgical technique, to provide more information to the surgeon of the various surgical options available in practice.

Materials and methods

A systematic review was performed by the authors in January 2023 as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to identify all studies outlining the all-inside surgical technique in the past decade. The predetermined eligibility criteria were applied in the screening of the literature in Pubmed, Cochrane and Google Scholar databases.

Results

A total of 14 studies were included in the final review, 9 technical studies, 2 case series, 2 book chapters and 1 review. An allograft was the preferred choice in 9 of the 14 studies. The semitendinosus was preferred when an autograft was chosen. Quadruple folding of the graft was the preferred configuration in 11 studies with the graft diameters from 8 to 12 mm and length ranging from 60 to 150 mm. The femur socket length ranged from 15 to 35 mm and the tibia socket length ranged from 20 to 70 mm. All the studies reported the use of at least 3 portals and up to 6 portals was also reported. 13 studies reported the graft docking first into tibia socket followed by the femoral socket. 7 studies reported the graft entry via the AM portal and 6 studies used a lateral portal. 9 studies used augmentation such as suture anchors (6 studies) and suture tape (3 studies). The 30° and 70° arthroscopic lenses were used alternatingly in 8 studies and fluoroscopy was utilized in 10 studies.

Conclusion

The current literature review of all-inside PCL reconstruction consisted mainly technical studies and more clinical outcomes studies are needed to determine its efficacy. It observed a trend to use an allograft, at least 3 portals and docking the graft in the tibia socket first. There is no obvious preference of portal for graft entry.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Placement: An Analysis of the Intended Versus Achieved Position for 221 International High-Volume ACL Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Femoral tunnels that are not anatomically placed within the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) footprint during ACL reconstruction are associated with residual instability, graft rupture, and poor clinical outcomes. Although surgeons may intend to place their femoral tunnels within the native ACL attachment, this is not always achieved. This study assesses the variation between intended and achieved femoral tunnel positions in a large cohort of experienced ACL surgeons.

HYPOTHESIS

The accuracy with which experienced ACL surgeons achieve their intended femoral tunnel position is dependent on viewing portal, localization strategy, and drilling technique.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 221 surgeons indicated their intended femoral tunnel location on a true lateral radiograph of a cadaveric knee specimen and a scaled photograph. Each surgeon then arthroscopically demonstrated the femoral tunnel on the specimen. The position was captured using fluoroscopy. The Euclidean distance (the straight-line distance between 2 points) between the intended and achieved tunnel positions, referenced to a grid applied to the lateral femoral condyle, was compared. Data were analyzed according to surgeons' viewing portal (anteromedial [AM] or anterolateral [AL]), tunnel localization strategy (offset aimer, estimation from landmarks, ACL ruler, or C-arm fluoroscopy), and stated drilling technique (transtibial, AM portal, or outside-in).

RESULTS

Surgeons who viewed the lateral intercondylar notch wall through the AM portal were closer (mean distance, 9.5) to their intended position than those who viewed through the AL portal (mean distance, 15.1; P < .0001). By localization strategy, the mean distance between achieved and intended tunnel positions was greater for surgeons who used an offset aimer (14.5) and estimated the femoral tunnel position (12.9) than for those using a malleable ACL ruler (8.1; P < .0001) and fluoroscopy (4.3; P < .0001). Surgeons' preferred drilling technique (AM portal, transtibial, or outside-in) had no effect on distance between intended and achieved positions. However, the mean achieved position was higher in the intercondylar notch for those using transtibial drilling (P < .042).

CONCLUSION

Surgeons using the AM portal to view the femoral attachment site were closer to their intended tunnel position than those who viewed it with the arthroscope in the AL portal. Surgeons who used fluoroscopy to localize femoral tunnel position were the closest to their intended position. Those who used estimation or an offset aimer had the farthest distance between achieved and intended tunnel positions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Although accurate tunnel placement can be achieved using any method, given the disparity between intended and achieved tunnel positions, it may be advisable, even for high-volume surgeons, to verify the placement of their tunnels using either fluoroscopy or a malleable ACL ruler to ensure that they achieve their intended position. Fluoroscopy may be particularly useful for cases where the native femoral stump is no longer visible and for revisions. Viewing through the AM portal is recommended to aid accuracy of tunnel placement.

Femoral offset guide facilitates accurate and precise femoral tunnel placement for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of femoral tunnel placement by expert and novice surgeons using an offset guide for single-bundle ACL reconstruction via the anteromedial (AM) portal.

METHODS

Twenty-five single-bundle ACL reconstructions performed by a novice surgeon were matched with 25 ACL reconstructions performed by an expert surgeon, based on one-to-one propensity score matching. The same technique was used by both groups for femoral tunnel placement using a 7-mm offset guide through the AM portal. Using the Bernard and Hertel grid method for postoperative three-dimensional reconstructed computed tomography, the accuracy and precision of various tunnel positions were compared.

RESULTS

No differences were found between the proximal-distal and anterior-posterior femoral tunnel placements by the two groups (proximal-distal; 30.5% involving experts, and 32.5% by novices, n.s) (anterior-posterior; 32.6% involving experts, and 31.6% by novice, n.s). The accuracy of the femoral tunnel positions, based on the average distance from the tunnel center to the center of ACL direct insertion, was similar between the two groups (n.s). No differences were found between the groups in terms of precision of femoral tunnel positions (n.s).

CONCLUSION

Novice surgeons can achieve accuracy and precision comparable to experts in creating femoral tunnels via single-bundle ACL reconstruction through the AM portal using a femoral offset guide. We recommend the use of a femoral offset guide for ACL reconstruction during the learning phase of a novice surgeon for effective tunnel placement to reduce the learning curve required to perform accurate and reproducible ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control study, Level III.

Radiation Exposure from Fluoroscopy during Hip Arthroscopy

Objective  Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement treatment is a procedure that is not exempted from complications. The most common complications are related to the arthroscopic portals and the traction system. The use of fluoroscopy helps in hip arthroscopy; however, the radiation exposure is a risk that has not yet been studied. Materials and Methods  A retrospective study with 100 arthroscopies was performed. Surgical indication in all cases was femoroacetabular impingement. Surgical times and radiation exposure during the procedure had been recorded and reviewed for the present study. Results  A mean of 138.20 cGy cm 2 radiation exposures was observed per patient and procedure for a mean time of radiation exposure of 0.36 minutes. These values are much lower than the values described as being at risk by the nuclear security commissions. Conclusions  Radiation exposure in a hip arthroscopy due to femoroacetabular impingement is in margins well below the limits at risk for the patient.

Radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing fluoroscopic procedures and for operators performing those procedures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate radiation exposure of dogs and cats undergoing procedures requiring intraoperative fluoroscopy and for operators performing those procedures.

SAMPLE

360 fluoroscopic procedures performed at 2 academic institutions between 2012 and 2015.

PROCEDURES

Fluoroscopic procedures were classified as vascular, urinary, respiratory, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and orthopedic. Fluoroscopy operators were classified as interventional radiology-trained clinicians, orthopedic surgeons, soft tissue surgeons, internists, and cardiologists. Total radiation exposure in milligrays and total fluoroscopy time in minutes were obtained from dose reports for 4 C-arm units. Kruskal-Wallis equality of populations rank tests and Dunn pairwise comparisons were used to compare differences in time and exposure among procedures and operators.

RESULTS

Fluoroscopy time (median, 35.80 minutes; range, 0.60 to 84.70 minutes) was significantly greater and radiation exposure (median, 137.00 mGy; range, 3.00 to 617.51 mGy) was significantly higher for vascular procedures than for other procedures. Median total radiation exposure was significantly higher for procedures performed by interventional radiology-trained clinicians (16.10 mGy; range, 0.44 to 617.50 mGy), cardiologists (25.82 mGy; range, 0.33 to 287.45 mGy), and internists (25.24 mGy; range, 3.58 to 185.79 mGy).

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Vascular fluoroscopic procedures were associated with significantly longer fluoroscopy time and higher radiation exposure than were other evaluated fluoroscopic procedures. Future studies should focus on quantitative radiation monitoring for patients and operators, importance of operator training, intraoperative safety measures, and protocols for postoperative monitoring of patients.

Tibial tunnel placement in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison study of outcomes between patient-specific drill template versus conventional arthroscopic techniques

INTRODUCTION

Accurate anatomic graft tunnel positioning is essential for the successful application of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The accurate insertion of the tibial tunnel (TT) remains challenging. Here, we explored a novel strategy of patient-specific drill template (PDT) for the placement of TT in ACL reconstruction and assessed its efficacy and accuracy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TT placement was randomized and performed by use of the PDT technique in 40 patients (PDT group) and the conventional arthroscopic technique in 38 patients (Arthroscopic group). After surgery, the deviations at the center point of the ACL tibial attachment area and radiological TT positioning were assessed in both groups. The preoperative and follow-up examinations included pivot-shift testing, KT-1000 arthrometer testing, the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scales were used to compare the knee stability and the functional state.

RESULTS

The ideal center points achieved in the PDT group were more precise than that in the arthroscopic group (p < 0.001). Radiological TT positioning performed by use of the PDT technique was more accurate than that by the arthroscopic technique (p = 0.027). Statistical differences could not be found between the groups in terms of the pivot-shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer laxity measurements, the Lysholm or International Knee Documentation Committee scales. Both groups improved at follow-up compared with the preoperative assessment in terms of the pivot-shift test, the laxity tests, and scoring scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel PDT strategy could provide more accurate TT positioning than the traditional arthroscopic technique in ACL reconstruction. However, functional scales and stability tests gave similar results in the PDT and the standard techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Accurate Positioning of Femoral and Tibial Tunnels in Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Indigenously Made Bernard and Hurtle Grid on a Transparency Sheet and C-arm

Many factors determine the outcome of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. The single most important factor, also well within the control of a surgeon, is tunnel placement. It is difficult to accurately determine the center of the anterior cruciate ligament foot print, and many a times it is also difficult to accurately define the intercondylar and bifurcate ridge. This makes determination of the accurate entry point of the guidewire difficult. We have printed our indigenously formed grid (equidistant boxes) on an old-fashioned transparency sheet. We use a fluoroscopy (C-arm) shot intraoperatively in the lateral position and superimpose this sheet to determine the position of the guidewire by calculating the percentage of boxes. We aim at 27.7% in proximal to distal and 37.5% in anterior to posterior on the femur side and 45% in front to back and medial to lateral on the tibial side. C-arm is freely available, but the inbuilt grid facility may be available in only the higher version of C-arms. Our indigenously designed grid can be easily used across the globe with ease to achieve accuracy in tunnel placement without violating anatomy and without any extra cost.

The effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement in single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the potential effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement in anatomic ACL reconstruction, using an ideal anatomic point as reference and evaluating postoperative tunnel placement based on 3D CT.

METHODS

An experienced ACL surgeon, using the anatomic approach for femoral tunnel placement, relying on intraarticular landmarks and remnants of the torn ACL-and novel to the fluoroscopic assist-was introduced to its use. A prospective series of patients was included where group 1 (without fluoroscopy) and group 2 (with fluoroscopy) both had postoperative CT scans so that femoral tunnel position could be evaluated and compared to an ideal tunnel centre based on anatomic studies by using the Bernard and Hertel grid.

RESULTS

Group 2, where fluoroscopy was used, had a mean femoral tunnel that was closer to the ideal anatomic centre than group 1. In the Bernard and Hertel grid, the distance in the high-low axis (y-axis) was found significantly closer (P = 0.001), whilst the deep-shallow axis (x-axis) and a total absolute distance were not significantly closer to the ideal described anatomic centre.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative fluoroscopy was found effective as an aid for placing the femoral tunnel in a more accurate position, as compared to a desired anatomic centre. Although the concept of the "one-size-fits-all" approach for tunnel placement is debatable, the avoidance of grossly misplaced tunnels is the benefit of using fluoroscopy during ACL reconstruction. The authors hold that fluoroscopy is readily available, safe and easy to use and therefore a good aid in the anatomic approach for graft tunnel placement, for example, in a learning situation, in revision cases and when performing low volumes of such surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

How accurate are anatomic landmarks for femoral tunnel positioning in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? An in vivo imaging analysis comparing both anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of 2 independent surgical techniques, an inside-out technique and an outside-in technique, using bony landmarks on the femoral wall, to place the anterior cruciate ligament graft anatomically.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was conducted in 2012 and included patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Two techniques were used: The lateral condylar wall was visualized from the anterolateral portal and tunnels were drilled "outside-in" in one group, whereas viewing was performed from the anteromedial portal and retrograde drilling ("inside-out") was performed in the other group. The primary outcome measure was the placement of the tunnel center point on postoperative computed tomography scans with 3-dimensional reconstruction, according to the radiographic quadrant method of Bernard and Hertel. The measurements were compared with optimal placements according to Bird et al. Their reliability was assessed with Spearman (rho) and intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

Forty patients were included, with 20 in each group; the mean age was 29.8 ± 9.6 years, and there were 33 men and 7 women. The interobserver reliability and intraobserver reliability of measurements were good, with a Spearman ρ between 0.46 (P = .002) and 0.93 (P < .001) and an intraclass correlation coefficient between 0.44 (P = .001) and 0.86 (P < .001). The femoral tunnel positions of both techniques were close to the previously published anatomic placements, but there was a significant difference between our results and the theoretical position in proximal-distal measurements (P = .01). There was no difference in the anteroposterior measurements. There was no statistical difference in the accuracy of placement of the femoral tunnel center point between these 2 independent techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The direct arthroscopic visualization of bony landmarks seems sufficient for accurate positioning of the femoral tunnel whatever the drilling technique. This finding is clinically relevant because the routine use of direct measurement techniques or intraoperative radiographs may not be necessary to obtain anatomic tunnel placement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Avoiding Complications and Technical Variability During Arthroscopically Assisted Transtibial ACL Reconstructions by Using a C-Arm With Image Intensifier

BACKGROUND

Surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be complicated by incorrect and variable tunnel placement, graft tunnel mismatch, cortical breaches, and inadequate fixation due to screw divergence. This is the first report describing the use of a C-arm with image intensifier employed for the sole purpose of eliminating those complications during transtibial ACL reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To determine if the use of a C-arm with image intensifier during arthroscopically assisted transtibial ACL reconstruction (IIAA-TACLR) eliminated common complications associated with bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction, including screw divergence, cortical breaches, graft-tunnel mismatch, and improper positioning of the femoral and tibial tunnels.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 110 consecutive patients (112 reconstructed knees) underwent identical IIAA-TACLR using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft performed by a single surgeon. Intra- and postoperative radiographic images and operative reports were evaluated for each patient looking for evidence of cortical breeching and screw divergence. Precision of femoral tunnel placement was evaluated using a sector map modified from Bernard et al. Graft recession distance and tibial α angles were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no femoral or tibial cortical breaches noted intraoperatively or on postoperative images. There were no instances of loss of fixation screw major thread engagement. There were no instances of graft-tunnel mismatch. The positions of the femoral tunnels were accurate and precise, falling into the desired sector of our location map (sector 1). Tibial α angles and graft recession distances varied widely.

CONCLUSION

The use of the C-arm with image intensifier enabled accurate and precise tunnel placement and completely eliminated cortical breach, graft-tunnel mismatch, and screw divergence during IIAA-TACLR by allowing incremental adjustment of the tibial tunnel and knee flexion angle. Incremental adjustment was essential to accomplish this. Importantly, a C-arm with image intensifier can be used with any ACL reconstruction that incorporates tunnels in the technique, with the expectation of increase in accuracy and precision and the elimination of common complications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of an image intensifier during transtibial ACL reconstruction will substantially reduce the common complications associated with the procedure and improve both accuracy and precision of tibial and femoral tunnel placement. Use of an image intensifier unit is generalizable to an individual surgeon's preferences for graft choices and drilling techniques and will be especially valuable when the intercondylar architecture is altered from injury, time, or prior surgery.

The use of intra-operative fluoroscopy for tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to assess the use of intra-operative fluoroscopy in the assessment of the position of the tibial tunnel during reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

METHODS

Between January and June 2009 a total of 31 arthroscopic hamstring ACL reconstructions were performed. Intra-operative fluoroscopy was introduced (when available) to verify the position of the guidewire before tunnel reaming. It was only available for use in 20 cases, due to other demands on the radiology department. The tourniquet times were compared between the two groups and all cases where radiological images lead to re-positioning of the guide wire were recorded. The secondary outcome involved assessing the tibial interference screw position measured on post-operative radiographs and comparing with the known tunnel position as shown on intra-operative fluoroscopic images.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients treated with fluoroscopy, the imaging led to repositioning of the tibial guide wire before reaming in three (15%). The mean tourniquet time with intra-operative fluoroscopy was 56 minutes (44 to 70) compared with 51 minutes (42 to 67) for the operations performed without. Six patients (30%) had post-operative screw positions that were > 5% more posterior than the known position of the tibial tunnel.

CONCLUSION

Intra-operative fluoroscopy can be effectively used to improve the accuracy of tibial tunnel positions with minimal increase in tourniquet time. This study also demonstrates the potential inaccuracy associated with plain radiological assessment of tunnel position.

Establishing the radiation risk from fluoroscopic-assisted arthroscopic surgery of the hip

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to quantify patient exposure to ionising radiation during fluoroscopic-assisted arthroscopic surgery of the hip, establish a risk profile of this exposure, and reassure patients of radiation safety during the procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the dose area products for 50 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery by an experienced hip arthroscopic surgeon. The effective dose and organ dose were derived using a Monte Carlo program.

RESULTS

The mean total fluoroscopy time was 1.10 minutes and the mean dose area product value was 297.2 cGycm(2). We calculated the entrance skin dose to be 52 mGy to the area where the beam was targeted (81 cm(2)). The mean effective dose for intra-operative fluoroscopy was 0.33 mSv, with a SD of 0.90 Sv.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that fluoroscopic-assisted arthroscopic surgery of the hip is safe with a low maximum radiation dose and supports its continued use in preference to alternative imaging modalities.

Validation of a new technique to determine midbundle femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate and report on a new intraoperative measuring technique to place the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel in the center of the native ACL femoral insertion site.

METHODS

We investigated a novel measuring technique based on identifying the proximal border of the articular cartilage and using a specific ruler parallel to the femoral axis to locate the origin of the ACL. The accuracy of this technique was validated by measuring tunnel position on postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Bony tunnels created by the ruler technique were compared with tunnels drilled by a traditional technique referenced from the back wall of the notch.

RESULTS

Fifty ACL reconstructions were performed by the novel measuring technique, with placement of the femoral tunnel at the center of the femoral insertion. The mean position for the center of the femoral tunnel measured by the ruler technique was 0.9 mm from the theoretic optimal center position but was a very distinct 5 mm from the mean position in the traditional tunnels.

CONCLUSIONS

The ruler technique produced femoral tunnels comparable to published radiographic criteria used for tunnel placement and is reproducible and accurate. We recommend placement of the femoral tunnel at the midpoint of the lateral femoral condyle when using the anatomic single-bundle technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.