The impact of an Acute Knee Clinic

Navigating ACL Injuries Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction In the United Kingdom, musculoskeletal injuries represent a substantial proportion of primary care appointments, and within this category, acute knee injuries are prominent in accident and emergency department cases. Notably, diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries is a recognized challenge, often leading to extended diagnostic delays. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the management of musculoskeletal disorders, driven by reduced surgical capacities, creating a backlog of patients awaiting necessary surgical interventions. Delayed ACL reconstruction poses risks of prolonged knee instability and secondary injuries. To address these concerns, this study evaluates the impact of COVID-19 on the timeline from ACL injury diagnosis to MRI and surgical intervention, with a specific focus on an internal acute knee clinic pathway designed to expedite the evaluation, diagnosis, and management of soft tissue knee injuries. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively reviewed all the patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction from January 2019 to November 2022 in a district general teaching hospital (DGH). Besides demographic data of the patients, we recorded the dates of injury, primary presentation, first knee specialist review, knee MRI, and ACL reconstruction surgery, as well as the injury-to-surgery, injury-to-MRI, and MRI-to-surgery periods. Patients were divided based on the date of operation to pre- and post-COVID, and outcomes were compared to see the possible effects of COVID-19. Data were analyzed using a quantitative and qualitative test with a P < 0.05 significance level. Results Our cohort included 97 patients, and the mean age of patients was 30.6 years (17-53 years). The median time of injury-to-MRI was 46.5 days during the pre-COVID period, which decreased to 44 days in the post-COVID period (P = 0.596). The median time of injury-to-surgery was 287.5 days during the pre-COVID period, which increased to 289 days in the post-COVID period (P = 0.019). The median MRI-to-surgery duration was 200 days during the pre-COVID period, which increased to 225 days in the post-COVID period (P = 0.006). Around 35% of patients had an MRI prior to getting evaluated by a specialist. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the management of ACL injuries, with delays in elective knee clinics and surgery potentially leading to delays in the diagnosis and management of such injuries. However, our study showed that the delay from ACL injury to subsequent surgery actually reduced post-pandemic due to hospital-based acute knee pathway, which is particularly important in the context of associated meniscal injury that can worsen while patients wait for surgery.

Personal and narrative review of the current management of the injured anterior cruciate ligament of the knee in the UK with reference to surgical treatment versus rehabilitation

Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee is a common injury occurring mostly in young athletic individuals taking part in pivoting, cutting and jumping sports. It is demonstrated by anterolateral rotatory instability on clinical testing. As yet there are no clear guidelines as to whom will benefit from surgical reconstruction as opposed to rehabilitation alone, apart from elite athletes (defined as varsity players or those participating in sport at national or international level). Also, some adolescent knees and those with combined injuries, usually meniscal tears, may benefit from surgery. Even after surgery there is an increased incidence of rerupture and the development of degenerative changes in the operated knee, particularly in the young athlete who has returned to a high level of sporting activity. Early diagnosis is essential to provide a focused care pathway and to avoid the consequences of chronic cruciate insufficiency.

Currently, it seems that too many anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions may be undertaken where rehabilitation alone would have sufficed. Better preoperative clinical testing including improved arthrometric assessment, muscle and neurological testing and imaging including radiology and MRI may help refine the diagnosis, thus enabling a better decision on further management. There is also a requirement for better designed clinical studies reporting on the outcomes of treatment be it either surgical or conservative.

Evaluating the diagnostic pathway for acute ACL injuries in trauma centres: a systematic review

Objective

This review sought to evaluate the literature on the initial assessment and diagnostic pathway for patients with a suspected Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) tear.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were systematically searched for eligible studies, PRISMA guidelines were followed. Studies were included if they used at least one assessment method to assess for ACL injury and participants were assessed at an acute trauma centre within 6-weeks of injury. Article quality was evaluated using the QUADAS-2 checklist.

Results

A total of 353 studies were assessed for eligibility, 347 were excluded for the following reasons: injuries were not assessed in an acute trauma setting, injuries were not acute, participants had previous ACL injuries or chronic joint deformities affecting the knee, participants were under 18, or participants included animals or cadavers. A total of six studies were included in the review. Common assessment methods included: laxity tests, joint effusion, inability to continue activity, and a history of a ‘pop’ and ‘giving way’ at the time of injury. Diagnostic accuracy varied greatly between the assessment method and the assessing clinician. Gold standard diagnostics were MRI and arthroscopy. A weighted meta-mean calculated the time to reach diagnosis to be 68.60 days [CI 23.94, 113.24]. The mean number of appointments to reach diagnosis varied from 2–5. Delay to surgery or surgical consultation ranged from 61 to 328 days.

Conclusion

Clinicians in the Emergency Department are not proficient in performing the assessment methods that are used for diagnosis in acute ACL injury. Reliance on specialist assessments or radiological methods inevitably increases the time to reach a diagnosis, which has repercussions on management options. There is an ever-growing demand to improve diagnostic accuracy and efficiency; further exploration into quantitative measures of instability would aid the assessment of peripheral joint assessment.

How useful are virtual fracture clinics?: a systematic review

Background

Due to the overwhelming demand for trauma services, resulting from increasing emergency department attendances over the past decade, virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) have become the fashion to keep up with the demand and help comply with the BOA Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines. In this article, we perform a systematic review asking, “How useful are VFCs?”, and what injuries and conditions can be treated safely and effectively, to help decrease patient face to face consultations. Our primary outcomes were patient satisfaction, clinical efficiency and cost analysis, and clinical outcomes.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search of all papers pertaining to VFCs, using the search engines PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Searches were carried out and screened by two authors, with final study eligibility confirmed by the senior author.

Results

In total, 21 records were relevant to our research question. Six orthopaedic injuries were identified as suitable for VFC review, with a further four discussed in detail. A reduction of face to face appointments of up to 50% was reported with greater compliance to BOAST guidelines (46.4%) and cost saving (up to £212,000).

Conclusions

This systematic review demonstrates that the VFC model can help deliver a safe, more cost-effective, and more efficient arm of the trauma service to patients.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-11:683–690.

Management of anterior cruciate ligament injury: pathophysiology and treatment

Anterior cruciate ligament injury, a common soft tissue injury of the knee joint, is increasing in incidence particularly in young active people. It causes instability of the knee that leads to meniscal tears, cartilage defects and early osteoarthritis. This review summarizes aspects of anterior cruciate ligament injury management.

Anterior cruciate ligament injury: A persistently difficult diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Historically anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries have been diagnosed poorly. A paper published in Injury in 1996 showed that less than 10% of patients with an ACL injury had the diagnosis made by the first physician to see them and that the average delay from first presentation to diagnosis was 21 months. The aim of our study was to investigate whether an improvement has been made over the last two decades in diagnosing ACL injuries.

METHODS

We identified 160 patients who had an ACL reconstruction performed by a single surgeon between October 2004 and December 2011 and for whom a complete data set was available. Data was extracted retrospectively from the hospital notes and a dedicated patient database. We performed a sub-group analysis comparing patients seen prior to the introduction of an acute knee injury clinic in April 2007 and patients seen after the introduction of the clinic.

RESULTS

75.1% (120/160) of patients presented first to an emergency department (ED) or to their general practitioner (GP), but only 14.4% (23/160) were diagnosed on initial presentation. The median number of healthcare professionals a patient saw prior to a diagnosis of ACL injury was 3. The median delay from injury to presentation was 0 weeks (range 0-885), injury to diagnosis 13 weeks (0-926), presentation to diagnosis 10 weeks (0-924), presentation to a specialist knee clinic 24 weeks (0-1006), and specialist knee clinic to surgery 13 weeks (0-102). The median total time from injury to surgery was 42 weeks (0-1047). Following the implementation of an acute knee injury clinic in 2007, the median delay from presentation to surgery dropped from 59 weeks to 36 weeks (p = 0.050) and there was a significant decrease in the median delay from specialist knee clinic to surgery from 23 to 11 weeks (p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Over the past two decades there appears to have been little improvement in the early diagnosis of ACL injuries, with only 14.4% of patients being diagnosed correctly at initial presentation. We recommend further education of emergency and primary care clinicians in the diagnosis of ACL injuries, emphasising the importance of the typical history of an ACL injury. The implementation of an acute knee injury clinic may help minimise delays to surgery, which should result in better patient outcomes.

Prevalence and consequences of delayed diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures

PURPOSE

Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common injury, often presenting with a typical injury pattern. Historically, the literature indicates that the accuracy of diagnosis of ACL ruptures is poor at the initial medical consultation. The aims of this study were to determine: the mechanism of injury; changes in accuracy of diagnosis of ACL ruptures at initial presentation over the last decade; and the effect of subsequent delay in diagnosis and definitive treatment.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of one hundred and thirty-two consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between 2005 and 2009 were analysed. The median age of the patients was 18 years (12-57). Sixteen patients were excluded due to chronic ACL injury.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen patients (117 ACL ruptures) were included in the analysis. A typical injury pattern was documented in 87 (74.4 %) of cases. The most common sporting activities associated with an ACL injury were football (35.3 %), skiing (21.6 %) and rugby (10.3 %). The majority of patients (67.5 %) sought medical attention within 1 week from time of injury. The correct diagnosis of an ACL rupture was made in 33 cases (28.2 %) at the initial medical consultation. The diagnosis was made following medical consultation in 13 (11.1 %) of cases with the use of magnetic resonance imaging and 6 (5.1 %) cases at arthroscopy. The median time to diagnosis was 6 weeks (0-192), and the median time to ACL reconstruction was 24 weeks (1-240). A delay in diagnosis of >6 months was associated with a medial meniscal tear rate of 72.2 % compared to 23.1 % if the diagnosis was made within 4 months of the injury (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a 'typical' mechanism of injury leading to ACL rupture, the rate of initial diagnosis in the UK still remains poor. This often leads to an unnecessary delay in the diagnosis and subsequent treatment and increases the risk of secondary injury to the knee. A delay in diagnosis of >6 months was associated with an increased medial meniscal tear rate. Patients who present with a 'typical' injury pattern should therefore be referred for further assessment by a knee specialist within 6 weeks.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The incidence of secondary pathology after anterior cruciate ligament rupture in 5086 patients requiring ligament reconstruction

We reviewed 5086 patients with a mean age of 30 years (9 to 69) undergoing primary reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in order to determine the incidence of secondary pathology with respect to the time between injury and reconstruction. There was an increasing incidence of medial meniscal tears and chondral damage, but not lateral meniscal tears, with increasing intervals before surgery. The chances of requiring medial meniscal surgery was increased by a factor of two if ACL reconstruction was delayed more than five months, and increased by a factor of six if surgery was delayed by > 12 months. The effect of delaying surgery on medial meniscal injury was also pronounced in the patients aged < 17 years, where a delay of five to 12 months doubled the odds of medial meniscal surgery (odds ratio (OR) 2.0, p = 0.001) and a delay of > 12 months quadrupled the odds (OR 4.3, p = 0.001). Increasing age was associated with a greater odds of chondral damage (OR 4.6, p = 0.001) and medial meniscal injury (OR 2.9, p = 0.001), but not lateral meniscal injury. The gender split (3251 men, 1835 women) revealed that males had a greater incidence of both lateral (34% (n = 1114) vs 20% (n = 364), p = 0.001) and medial meniscal tears (28% (n = 924) vs 25% (n = 457), p = 0.006), but not chondral damage (35% (n = 1152) vs 36% (n = 665), p = 0.565). We conclude that ideally, and particularly in younger patients, ACL reconstruction should not be delayed more than five months from injury.