Endoscopic stent insertion for anastomotic leakage following oesophagectomy

The Use of Esophageal Stents in the Management of Postoperative Fistulas-Current Status, Clinical Outcomes and Perspectives-Review

Esophageal fistula remains one of the main postoperative complications, with the treatment often requiring the use of stents. This article reviews the updates on the use of endoscopic stents for the treatment of postoperative esophageal leakage in terms of indications, types of stents used, efficiency, specific complications and perspectives.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for the keywords postoperative esophageal anastomotic leak and postoperative esophageal anastomotic leak stent, and retrieved relevant papers published until December 2022.

RESULTS

The endoscopic discovery of the fistula is usually followed by the insertion of a fully covered esophageal stent. It has an efficiency of more than 60% in closing the fistula, and the failure is related to the delayed application of the method, a situation more suitable for endo vac therapy. The most common complication is migration, but life-threatening complications have also been described. The combination of the advantages of endoscopic stents and vacuum therapy is probably found in the emerging VACstent procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the competing approaches give promising results, this method has a well-defined place in the treatment of esophageal fistulas, and it is probably necessary to refine the indications for each individual procedure.

Stem-cell therapy via gastroscopy improves the outcome of esophageal anastomotic leakage

Background

Esophageal anastomotic leakage (EAL) is a severe complication usually occurring after esophagectomy. Although there are various therapeutic methods for EAL treatment, they have not achieved satisfactory results. A previous study showed that the combination of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and fibrin scaffold (FS) can treat EAL. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the injection of MSCs and FS through a new engraftment gastroscope for EAL treatment.

Methods

Twelve adult pigs were randomly divided into the MSCs group (n = 6) and control group (n = 6). A stomach tube was then inserted through the leakage to construct the EAL model, which was removed after one week. The combination of MSCs and FS was autografted at the EAL site for pigs in the MSCs group using the tailor-made gastroscope while only FS was autografted for the pigs in the control group. Local status of EAL was evaluated using gastroscopy. Histological analyses and western blot (WB) were used to assess the gross specimens of esophagi around EALs.

Results

Gastroscopy showed a higher closure rate and a lower infection rate in the MSCs group than in the control group. However, the mortality was not significantly different between the two groups. HE staining showed a severe inflammatory response with dispersive infiltration of inflammatory cells and unhealed leakage in the control group. However, the infiltration of inflammatory cells was not altered in the MSCs group, and the leakage was completely healed. WB analyses showed that Myogenin and α-SMA expressions were significantly higher in the MSCs group than in the control group.

Conclusion

A porcine model of EAL was successfully developed by accessing the transplantation site through the esophagus. Further data revealed that the implantation of MSCs in FS via the novel engraftment gastroscope can promote the repair and occlusion of EAL. Therefore, the proposed method is a promising strategy for EAL treatment.

Update on therapeutic strategy for esophageal anastomotic leak: A systematic literature review

Anastomotic leak is still a severe complication in esophageal surgery due to high mortality. This article reviews the updates on the treatment of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in order to provide reference for clinical treatment and research. The relevant studies published in the Chinese Zhiwang, Wanfang, and MEDLINE databases to December 21, 2021 were retrieved, and esophageal carcinoma, esophagectomy, anastomotic leakage, and fistula selected as the keywords. A total of 78 studies were finally included. The treatments include traditional surgical drainage, new reverse drainage trans-fistula, stent plugging, endoscopic clamping, biological protein glue injection plugging, endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT), and reoperation, etc. Early diagnosis, accurate classification and optimal treatment can promote the rapid healing of anastomotic leaks. EVT may be the most valuable approach, simultaneously with good commercial prospects. Reoperation should be considered in patients with complex fistula in which conservative treatment is insufficient or has failed.

Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on esophagectomies in esophageal cancer: The superiority of minimally invasive surgery

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses, with many limitations, have described the beneficial nature of minimal invasive procedures.

AIM

To compare all modalities of esophagectomies to each other from the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in a network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/) and CENTRAL databases to identify RCTs according to the following population, intervention, control, outcome (commonly known as PICO): P: Patients with resectable esophageal cancer; I/C: Transthoracic, transhiatal, minimally invasive (thoracolaparoscopic), hybrid, and robot-assisted esophagectomy; O: Survival, total adverse events, adverse events in subgroups, length of hospital stay, and blood loss. We used the Bayesian approach and the random effects model. We presented the geometry of the network, results with probabilistic statements, estimated intervention effects and their 95% confidence interval (CI), and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve to rank the interventions.

RESULTS

We included 11 studies in our analysis. We found a significant difference in postoperative pulmonary infection, which favored the minimally invasive intervention compared to transthoracic surgery (risk ratio 0.49; 95%CI: 0.23 to 0.99). The operation time was significantly shorter for the transhiatal approach compared to transthoracic surgery (mean difference -85 min; 95%CI: -150 to -29), hybrid intervention (mean difference -98 min; 95%CI: -190 to -9.4), minimally invasive technique (mean difference -130 min; 95%CI: -210 to -50), and robot-assisted esophagectomy (mean difference -150 min; 95%CI: -240 to -53). Other comparisons did not yield significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Based on our results, the implication of minimally invasive esophagectomy should be favored.

Management of refractory cervical anastomotic fistula after esophagectomy using the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap

INTRODUCTION

A refractory cervical anastomotic fistula which postoperatively remains unhealed for more than 2 months under conservative care severely impacts the quality of life of the patient and potentially leads to anastomotic stricture after the fistula heals. It is widely accepted that, to avoid this complication, refractory cervical anastomotic fistulas should undergo more aggressive treatments. However, when and which surgical intervention should be considered is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to evaluate the role of the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap in the management of refractory cervical anastomotic fistulas based on our experience of 6 cases and a literature review.

METHODS

Six patients diagnosed with refractory cervical anastomotic fistula after esophagectomy treated using pectoralis major myocutaneous flap transfer were included in the study. The clinical data, surgical details, and treatment outcome were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients survived the operations. One patient who had a circumferential anastomotic defect resulting from surgical exploration developed a mild fistula in the neo-anastomotic site in the 5th postoperative day, which healed after 7 days of conservative care. This patient developed an anastomotic stricture which was partially alleviated by an endoscopic anastomotic dilatation. All the other 5 patients had uneventful recoveries after operations and restored oral intake on the 10th-15th days after operation, and they tolerated normal diets without subsequent sequelae on follow-up. One patient developed both local and lung recurrence and died in 15 months after operation, while the other 5 patients survived with good tumor control during the follow-up of 25-53 months.

CONCLUSION

The satisfactory treatment outcome in our study demonstrates that pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction is a reliable management modality for refractory cervical anastomotic fistulas after esophagectomy, particularly for those patients who experienced persistent fistulas after conservative wound care and repeated wound closures.

Endoscopic management of anastomotic leak after esophageal or gastric resection for malignancy: a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Most anastomotic leaks after surgical resection for esophageal or esophagogastric junction malignancies are treated endoscopically with esophageal stents. Internal drainage by double pigtail stents has been used for the endoscopic management of leaks following bariatric surgery, and recently introduced for anastomotic leaks after resections for malignancies. Our aim was to assess the overall efficacy of the endoscopic treatment for anastomotic leaks after esophageal or gastric resection for malignancies.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in four digestive endoscopy tertiary referral centers in France. We included consecutive patients managed endoscopically for anastomotic leak following esophagectomy or gastrectomy for malignancies between January 2016 and December 2018. The primary outcome was the efficacy of the endoscopic management on leak closure.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were included, among which 46 men and 22 women, with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 11 years. Forty-four percent had an Ivor Lewis procedure, 16% a tri-incisional esophagectomy, and 40% a total gastrectomy. The median time between surgery and the diagnosis of leak was 9 (6-13) days. Endoscopic treatment was successful in 90% of the patients. The efficacy of internal drainage and esophageal stents was 95% and 77%, respectively (p = 0.06). The mortality rate was 3%. The only predictive factor of successful endoscopic treatment was the initial use of internal drainage (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management of early postoperative leak is successful in 90% of patients, preventing highly morbid surgical revisions. Internal endoscopic drainage should be considered as the first-line endoscopic treatment of anastomotic fistulas whenever technically feasible.

Management of Complications After Esophagectomy

Esophagectomy is a complex operation with many potential complications. Early recognition of postoperative complications allows for the best chance for patient survival. Diagnosis and management of conduit complications, including leak, necrosis, and conduit-airway fistulae, are reviewed. Other common complications, such as chylothorax and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, also are discussed.

Clinical score predicting a successful endoscopic approach of esophageal anastomotic leaks: external validation

BACKGROUND

Recently, a clinical prediction rule has been proposed to predict the chance of successful endoscopic stenting in benign esophageal anastomotic leakage, perforation and fistula. We aimed to validate this score in a cohort of patients with anastomotic leaks managed with self-expanding metal esophageal stents, by assessing technical and clinical success rates and comparing the agreement between the predicted and the actual clinical success.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study including patients submitted to endoscopic stenting due to anastomotic leak was conducted. Variables of the score (leak size, location and C-reactive protein) were collected and the chance of success (≤50, 50-70 and ≥70%) and its accuracy was assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients, submitted to esophageal stenting after cancer (n = 47) and bariatric surgery were included. Clinical success was achieved in 62% of patients. The area under the ROC curve to differentiate between successful and failed therapies showed a good discriminative power of the score (AUC 0.705; P < 0.01). For a predicted chance of success >50%, the positive predictive value was 72.5%; for a chance of success ≤50%, the negative predictive value was 69.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of this predictive model in patients with anastomotic leaks proved to be valid in a different cohort from that in which it was derived. Its usefulness in clinical practice may be anticipated, favoring stenting in patients with a chance of success >50%. However, we must be cautious in patients with a lower probability of success and a case-by-case decision should be made.

Interventional Protocol for Treatment of Complications after Esophagojejunostomy for Esophagogastric Carcinoma

Background

Anastomotic stenosis and leakage are rare complications after esophagojejunostomy. The management of complications after esophagojejunostomy remains a challenge. We evaluated the outcomes and clinical effectiveness of an alternative interventional protocol.

Objectives

To determine the safety and efficacy of interventional treatment for the management of complications after esophagojejunostomy.

Methods

This study included 24 consecutive patients with complications after esophagojejunostomy treated using interventional protocol. Patients received balloon dilation or stenting for anastomotic stenosis. Patients with anastomotic leakage received three-tube placement or retrievable covered esophageal stent placement, followed by abscess drainage, nutritional support, and anti-inflammatory treatment. The three tubes and esophageal stents were removed after leakage healing and stenosis ceased.

Results

Thirteen patients received three-tube method, and 16 patients received covered stent placement. All procedures were technically successful, except for a failure of Y-type esophageal stent placement in one patient. The median retention time of stent and abscess drainage tube was 67.5 days and 87 days, respectively. No perioperative death, esophageal rupture, or massive hemorrhage was found during procedures. During follow-up, 14 patients died of cancer recurrence, and one died of severe pulmonary infection. The 1-, 3-, 5-year survival rates were 39.5%, 23.7%, and 23.7%, respectively.

Conclusion

Interventional protocol is safe, feasible, and efficacious for treatment of complications after esophagojejunostomy.

[Interventional treatment of tracheoesophageal/bronchoesophageal fistulas]

A tracheoesophageal fistula is the formation of an abnormal communication between the airway and the esophagus. Acquired tracheoesophageal fistulas can be benign or malignant. The management is either surgical or endoscopic depending on the etiology, size and anatomy of the fistula as well as on the patient's performance status. The interventional treatment of choice is endoscopic stent implantation. In general, tracheoesophageal fistulas in patients with benign conditions are managed surgically. If the patient is unfit for surgery silicone stents should be used because they can be more easily removed after a longer indwelling time compared to metal stents. Malignant fistulas are associated with very limited life expectancy of only a few weeks or months. In this situation fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FC-SEMS) are recommended, whereas surgical treatment approaches can only be considered in individual cases. Depending on the location of the fistula and the presence of an airway stenosis, tracheal stenting, esophageal stenting or parallel stenting of the trachea and the esophagus is carried out. Successful stent placement leads to immediate palliation of symptoms, such as cough or aspiration and results in a higher quality of life. Potential complications are stent migration, bleeding of the upper gastrointestinal tract, arrosion of neighboring organs and vessels with esophageal stents as well as secretion retention and obstruction with displacement of the airway with tracheobronchial stents.

Outcome of Self-Expanding Metal Stents in the Treatment of Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Esophageal anastomotic leakages after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy are severe and life-threatening complications. We analyzed the outcome of using self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in the treatment of postoperative leakage after esophagogastrostomy.

METHODS

Seventy patients with esophageal anastomotic leakage after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer who had received SEMS treatment between January 2006 and December 2015 at our clinic were identified in this retrospective study. The patients were analyzed according to demographic characteristics, risk factors, leakage characteristics, stent characteristics, stent-related complications, sealing success rate and mortality.

RESULTS

Over a 10-year period, 70 patients received SEMS as treatment for postoperative anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy. Technical success of esophageal stenting in anastomotic leakage was achieved in 50 out of 70 cases (71.4%). Sealing success rate was 70% (n = 49) with a median treatment of 28 days (range 7-87). In 20 patients (28.6%), stent-related complications, such as stenosis, dislocation, leakage persistence, perforation or esophagotracheal fistula occurred after the SEMS treatment. Sixty-one patients (87.1%) survived SEMS treatment of esophagogastric anastomotic leakage. Mean follow-up for all patients was 38 months (IQR 10-76), and no significant difference was found in a comparison of the long-term survival rate between patients with successful and unsuccessful SEMS treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of esophageal anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with SEMS is effective, safe and technically feasible. Aggressive non-surgical management should be considered when developing a treatment plan for stenting.

Endoscopic treatment of nonmalignant tracheoesophageal and bronchoesophageal fistula: results and prognostic factors for its success

BACKGROUND

Nonmalignant esophago-respiratory fistulas (ERF) are frightening clinical situations, involving surgery with high morbi-mortality rate. We described the endoscopic management of benign ERF. The aim of the study was to describe outcomes of endoscopic treatment of nonmalignant ERF and to analyze factors associated with its success.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study involving patients managed for benign ERF in our center between 2012 and 2016. The ERFs were classified into three groups of sizes: (I) punctiform, (II) medium, and (III) large. The primary aim was to document the endoscopic success (= fistula's healing after 6 months). The secondary objectives were characteristics of endoscopic treatment, the functional success and death, and identifying factors associated with success and death.

RESULTS

22 patients were included. The etiologies of ERF were surgery in 12 patients, esophageal dilatation in 3, invasive ventilation in 3, radiation therapy in 2, and tracheostomy in 2. Ninety-three procedures were performed (mean of number: 4.2 ± 4.5/patient). Twenty-one patients had stent placement, eight over-the-scope clips (OTSC), and seven a combined therapy. The endoscopic success rate was 45.5% (n = 10; 67% in punctiform, 50% in medium, and 14% in large ERF), and the functional success was 55% (n = 12). Serious adverse events occurred in 9 patients (40.9%). Six patients died (27%). The persistence of the orifice after 6 months of endoscopic treatment was associated with failure (OR 44; IC95: 3.38-573.4; p = 0.004 multivariate analysis). The orifice's size was associated with mortality [71% of death if large fistulas (p = 0.001) univariate analysis].

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment of ERF leads to 45.5% of successful endoscopic closure and 55.5% of functional success, depending on fistula's orifice size. After 6 months without healing, the chances for success dramatically decrease.

Analysis of risk factors and classification of aortic fistula after esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Aortic fistula after esophagectomy is a rare and serious complication. The aims of this study were to describe the causes of and classify the fistulas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2017, a total of 1018 patients underwent esophageal resection, mainly for esophageal cancer; aortic fistula after esophagectomy was diagnosed in four patients. We perform a literature review through a database search for similar cases. Aortic fistulas may be classified into two types based on the site at which they occur in relation to the alimentary tract and area of anastomosis. Type 1 fistula occurs within the area of anastomosis, whereas type 2 fistula occurs above or below the anastomosis. The risk factors and clinical features associated with aortic fistulas are described, and comparison between the two types is made.

RESULTS

Through a literature search, 39 cases were identified, of which 26 cases were classified as type 1, and 13 cases were classified as type 2. Of 13 patients (33.3%) who underwent emergent intervention, seven patients survived. Approximately 76.9% of aortic fistula were related to anastomotic fistula, which was more prevalent in type 1 aortic fistula than in type 2 (92% versus 50%, P = 0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in age, gender, side of thoracotomy, type of anastomosis, the postoperative day the hemorrhage occurred, warning hemorrhage, chest pain, or the outcome between the two types of fistula.

CONCLUSIONS

Anastomotic fistula is the primary cause of type 1 aortic fistula after esophagectomy, and early diagnosis and intervention of aortic fistula can improve prognosis. This classification may be a useful guide in determining the approach for second-stage alimentary tract reconstruction.

Outcomes following the main treatment options in patients with a leaking esophagus: a systematic literature review

Leakage from the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction can be lethal due to uncontrolled contamination of the mediastinum. The most predominant risk factors for the subsequent clinical outcome are the patients' delay as well as the delay of diagnosis. Two major therapeutic concepts have been advocated: either prompt closure of the leakage by insertion of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) or more traditionally, surgical exploration. The objective of this review is to carefully scrutinize the recent literature and assess the outcomes of these two therapeutic alternatives in the management of iatrogenic perforation-spontaneous esophageal rupture as separated from those with anastomotic leak. A systematic web-based search using PubMed and the Cochrane Library was performed, reviewing literature published between January 2005 and December 2015. Eligible studies included all studies that presented data on the outcome of SEMS or surgical exploration in case of esophageal leak (including >3 patients). Only patients older than 15 years of age by the time of admission were included. Articles in other languages but English were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as a need for change in therapeutic strategy due to uncontrolled sepsis and mediastinitis, which usually meant rescue esophagectomy with end esophagostomy, death occurring as a consequence of the leakage or development of an esophagorespiratory fistula and/or other serious life threatening complications. Accordingly, the corresponding success rate is composed of cases where none of the failures above occurred. Regarding SEMS treatment, 201 articles were found, of which 48 were deemed relevant and of these, 17 articles were further analyzed. As for surgical management, 785 articles were retrieved, of which 82 were considered relevant, and 17 were included in the final analysis. It was not possible to specifically extract detailed clinical outcomes in sufficient numbers, when we tried to separately analyze the data in relation to the cause of the leakage: i.e. iatrogenic perforation-spontaneous esophageal rupture and anastomotic leak. As for SEMS treatment, originally 154 reports focused on iatrogenic perforation, 116 focused on spontaneous ruptures, and only four described the outcome following trauma and foreign body management. Only five studies used a prospective protocol to assess treatment efficacy. Regarding a leaking anastomosis, 80 reports contained information about the outcome after treatment of esophagogastrostomies and 35 reported the clinical course after an esophagojejunostomy. An overall success rate of 88% was reported among the 371 SEMS-treated patients, where adequate data were available, with a reported in hospital mortality amounting to 7.5%. Regarding the surgical exploration strategy, the vast majority of patients had an attempt to repair the defect by direct or enforced suturing. This surgical approach also included procedures such as patching with pleura or with a diaphragmatic flap. The overall reported success rate was 83% (305/368) and the in-hospital mortality was 17% (61/368). The current literature suggests that a SEMS-based therapy can be successfully applied as an alternative therapeutic strategy in esophageal perforation rupture.

Endoscopic naso-leakage drainage: a safe and effective method for the management of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy

Background

Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage (IAL) remains a major complication of esophagectomy. Main non-surgical options of management include chest drainage and endoscope interventions. This study is aim to present our experience and assess the efficacy of endoscopic naso-leakage drainage (ENLD) in patients with IAL.

Methods

From June 2011 to January 2017, 67 patients who developed IAL after esophagectomy and managed by non-surgical approaches were analyzed retrospectively. IAL was confirmed by clinical presentations combined with the evidence of CT scan, radiography and endoscopy. Thirty-eight patients were treated by conventional chest drainage (CD group) and 29 patients underwent ENLD with or without chest drainage (ENLD group), while other treatments including enteral nutrition and antibiotics had no difference between the two groups. In ENLD group, a 12 Fr naso-leakage tube was placed through the leakage to the bottom of vomica under ultra-slim electronic gastroscope. The naso-leakage tube was then connected to a gastrointestinal decompression device for drainage and was also used for rinse. When the vomica diminished and the drainage was also clean, the naso-leakage tube could be pulled back gradually. Finally, healing of the leakage was confirmed endoscopically. Clinical records of the two groups were analyzed.

Results

In ENLD group, naso-leakage tubes were successfully placed under endoscope in all 29 patients without any procedure-related complications. In CD group, the mortality is 7.9% (three patients) and five patients (13.2%) developed to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) due to insufficient drainage. While in ENLD group, there was only one patient (3.4%) developed to SIRS and no death was observed, but the difference was not statistically significant. When compared with the CD group, the ENLD group had a shorter healing course (44.2±18.3 vs. 60.5±27.7 days, P=0.008), duration of antibiotics usage (16.4±7.8 vs. 11.8±3.8 days, P<0.001) and duration of fever (4.3±2.2 vs. 9.5±8.6 days, P=0.002).

Conclusions

To our initial experience, ENLD is an ideal option with safety and efficacy in management of IAL after esophagectomy.

Clinical outcomes following self-expanding metal stent placement for esophageal salvage

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) for esophageal salvage in patients who would otherwise require esophageal/conduit resection.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who had SEMS placed from January 2010 to December 2015. Patient demographics, esophageal stent characteristics, and outcomes were assessed in our patient cohort.

RESULTS

Our study included a total of 83 patients. A total of 148 SEMS were placed, with 121 partially covered SEMS (pcSEMS) and 27 fully covered SEMS (cSEMS). A stent was placed more than once in 42.2% of the patients. Median duration of stent placement was 23 days. Indications for SEMS placement included esophageal leak after esophageal resection (45.8%), spontaneous esophageal perforation (22.9%), iatrogenic esophageal perforation (20.5%), and esophageal obstruction (9.6%). Complications from SEMS placement included 6 stent migrations and 1 esophageal perforation. Of the 6 stents that migrated, 2 were pcSEMS and 4 were cSEMS. In a patient who underwent stent placement for a stricture refractory to dilation, a perforation at the distal end was discovered 2 days after stent removal. The perforation healed after the second SEMS placement. Ultimately, 15 patients (18.1%) had to undergo a subsequent esophagectomy or takedown of their conduit with an overall 81.9% salvage of native esophagus or conduits.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates the successful use of SEMS in patients with anastomotic leaks, perforations, and recalcitrant strictures.

Factors Affecting Hospital Mortality in Patients with Esophagogastric Anastomotic Leak: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to clarify the association between anastomotic leak and leak-associated mortality to assist decision-making and reduce hospital mortality.

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leak is a common complication after esophagectomy, but the nature of its relationship to leak-associated mortality has not been established.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all esophagogastric anastomotic leaks that had occurred between 2008 and 2012 at our institution (n = 246) was performed. Risk factors for leak-associated mortality were determined using a multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 246 patients with anastomotic leaks, 14 (5.7 %) died. Leak-associated mortality rates were similar regardless of anastomosis location (cervical vs. thoracic anastomosis), surgical approaches (retrosternal vs. prevertebral reconstruction route) and anastomotic techniques (hand-sewn vs. mechanical anastomosis). When a leak occurred, risk factors for leak-associated mortality as determined by multivariate logistic analysis included patient age >60 years (P = 0.029) and the occurrence of the leak within 1 week of surgery (P = 0.039). When disease worsened after treatment, leak-associated mortality was more frequent in patients requiring reintubation (25.6 vs. 1.4 %, P < 0.001). Fatal bleeding and sepsis were the most common causes of leak-associated mortality.

CONCLUSION

In patients with anastomotic leaks, patient age >60 years and the occurrence of the leak within 1 week of surgery were risk factors for leak-associated mortality. Increased efforts to reduce the incidence of early anastomotic leaks within 1 week after surgery and prevent the need for reintubation are important for improving patient prognosis.

Early enteral nutrition compared with parenteral nutrition for esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis

Early postoperative enteral nutrition (EN) after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patient has been reported to be correlated with a better rehabilitation than parenteral nutrition (PN). However, a robust conclusion has not been achieved. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the postoperative EN and PN in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy. Three electronic databases were searched for eligible studies to be included in the meta-analysis. The summary relative risk/weighted mean difference (RR/WMD) estimates and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using fixed- and random-effects models. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis demonstrated that the early postoperative EN could significantly decrease the pulmonary complications (RR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.22-0.62, P = 0.00, test for heterogeneity: I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.89) and anastomotic leakage (RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22-0.96, P = 0.04, test for heterogeneity: I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.66) compared with PN. On the eighth postoperative day, the EN group had a higher levels of albumin (WMD = 1.84, 95% CI = 0.47-3.21, P = 0.01, test for heterogeneity: I(2) = 84.5%, P = 0.00) and prealbumin (WMD = 12.96, 95% CI = 3.63-22.29, P = 0.01, test for heterogeneity: I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.63) compared with the PN group. However, there was no difference in digestive complications between these two approaches (RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 0.79-2.13, P = 0.30, test for heterogeneity: I(2) = 0.0%, P = 0.97). For patients with esophageal cancer following esophagectomy, the early postoperative EN support could decrease the morbidity of severe complications, such as pulmonary complications and anastomotic leakage, and maintain patients at a better nutritional status than parenteral nutrion support.

Treatment of esophageal anastomotic leakage with self-expanding metal stents: analysis of risk factors for treatment failure

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

The endoscopic placement of self-expandable metallic esophageal stents (SEMS) has become the preferred primary treatment for esophageal anastomotic leakage in many institutions. The aim of this study was to investigate possible risk factors for failure of SEMS-based therapy in patients with esophageal anastomotic leakage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Beginning in 2003, all patients with an esophageal leak were initially approached and assessed for temporary closure with a SEMS. Until 2014, all patients at the Karolinska University Hospital with a leak from an esophagogastric or esophagojejunal anastomosis were identified. Data regarding the characteristics of the patients and leaks and the treatment outcomes were compiled. Failure of the SEMS treatment strategy was defined as death due to the leak or a major change in management strategy. The risk factors for treatment failure were analyzed with simple and multivariable logistic regression statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 447 patients with an esophagogastric or esophagojejunal anastomosis were identified. Of these patients, 80 (18 %) had an anastomotic leak, of whom 46 (58 %) received a stent as first-line treatment. In 29 of these 46 patients, the leak healed without any major change in treatment strategy. Continuous leakage after the application of a stent, decreased physical performance preoperatively, and concomitant esophagotracheal fistula were identified as independent risk factors for failure with multivariable logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Stent treatment for esophageal anastomotic leakage is successful in the majority of cases. Continuous leakage after initial stent insertion, decreased physical performance preoperatively, and the development of an esophagotracheal fistula decrease the probability of successful treatment.

Efficacy of the endoscopic management of postoperative fistulas of leakages after esophageal surgery for cancer: a retrospective series

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Anastomotic leakages are severe and often lethal adverse events of surgery for esophageal cancer. The endoscopic treatment is growing up in such indications. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and describe the strategy of the endoscopic management of anastomotic leakages/fistulas after esophageal oncologic surgery.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study on 126 patients operated for esophageal carcinomas between 2010 and 2014. Thirty-five patients with postoperative fistulas/leakages (27 %) were endoscopically managed and included. The primary endpoint was the efficacy of the endoscopic treatment. The secondary endpoints were: delays between surgery, diagnosis, endoscopy and recovery; number of procedures; material used; and adverse events rate. Uni- and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine predictive factors of success.

RESULTS

There were mostly men, with a median age of 61.7 years ± 8.9 [43-85]. 48.6 % underwent Lewis-Santy surgery and 45.7 % Akiyama's. 71.4 % patients received neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation therapy. The primary and secondary efficacy was 48.6 and 68.6 %, respectively. The delay between surgery and endoscopy was 8.5 days [6.00-18.25]. Eighty-eight percentages of the patients were treated using double-type metallic stents, with removability and migration rates of 100 and 18 %, respectively. In the other cases, we used over-the-scope clips, naso-cystic drain or combined approach. The mean number of endoscopy was 2.6 ± 1.57 [1-10]. The mortality rate was 17 %, none being related to procedures. No predictive factor of efficacy could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic management of leakages or fistulas after esophageal surgery reached an efficacy rate of 68.8 %, mostly using stents, without significant adverse events. The mortality rate could be decreased from 40-100 to 17 %.

Covered stents in cervical anastomoses following esophagectomy

INTRODUCTION

Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy are relatively frequent. The off-label use of self-expanding covered metal stents has been shown to be an effective initial treatment for leaks, but there is a paucity of literature regarding their use in cervical esophagogastric anastomoses. We reviewed our outcomes with anastomotic stenting after esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric reconstruction.

METHODS

All stents placed across cervical anastomoses following esophagectomy from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Indications for surgery and stent placement were collected. For patients with serial stents, each stent event was evaluated separately and as part of its series. Success was defined as resolution of indicated anastomotic problem for at least 90 days. Complications were defined as development of stent-related problems.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients had a total of 63 stents placed (16 % prophylactic, 38 % leak, 46 % stricture). Sixty percent of patients had successful resolution of their initial anastomotic problem; 67 % required more than one stent. Strictures and leaks healed in 27 and 70 % of patients, respectively, at a median of 55.5 days. Stent-related complications occurred in 78 % of patients. Complications (per stent event) included 62 % migration, 11 % clinically significant tissue overgrowth, 8 % minor erosion (ulcers), and 8 % major erosion. Stents placed for stricture were more likely to result in complications, especially migration (76.7 vs. 48.5 %, p = 0.02). Preoperative chemoradiation was a significant risk factor for erosion (22.5 vs. 4.3 %, p = 0.05), but not for overall complications. Patients with major erosions had longer stent duration compared to those without (92 vs. 36 days, p = 0.14).

DISCUSSION

Although stents are effective at controlling post-esophagectomy anastomotic leaks, they are not effective for treating strictures. Stents have high complication rates, but most are minor. Chemoradiation is a risk factor for stent erosion. Caution should be used when stent duration exceeds 2-3 months due to the risk of erosion.

Predictors of Successful Endoscopic Closure of Gastrointestinal Defects: Experience from a Single Tertiary Care Center

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Endoscopic closure is technically feasible in the majority of gastrointestinal defects. The aim of this study is to evaluate the technical and clinical outcomes, and identify variables predicting successful outcomes in patients with attempted closure.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients undergoing endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal defects between December 2007 and May 2013 at a single tertiary care center. Technical success (TS) was defined as successful closure of the defect at the time of endoscopy. Clinical improvement (CI) was defined as improvement in symptoms. Clinical resolution (CR) was defined as documented radiographic closure of defect or clinical resolution of symptoms. Acute defects were diagnosed within 6 weeks, while chronic defects were those that persisted for >6 weeks, prior to index therapeutic endoscopy.

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent 77 endoscopies for leaks (n = 23), fistulas (n = 22), and perforations (n = 5). TS occurred in 46/50 (92%). Overall, 34/50 (68%) patients had CR. CR was significantly higher for acute defects as compared to chronic defects (89.7 vs. 38.1%, OR 14.1, CI 3.19-62.1, p < 0.001). Of 24 patients who required repeat attempts at endoscopic closure, 14 (58%) achieved CR. Acute defects (p = 0.04) and those with initial CI (p = 0.001) were statistically more likely to achieve CR after a repeat attempt.

CONCLUSION

TS and CR are achieved in majority of patients. Acute defects are more likely to achieve CR. In cases where a defect persists, a repeat attempt at endoscopic closure should be attempted.

Comprehensive management of full-thickness luminal defects: The next frontier of gastrointestinal endoscopy

Full thickness gastrointestinal defects such as perforations, leaks, and fistulae are a relatively common result of many of the endoscopic and surgical procedures performed in modern health care. As the number of these procedures increases, so too will the number of resultant defects. Historically, these were all treated by open surgical means with the associated morbidity and mortality. With the recent advent of advanced endoscopic techniques, these defects can be treated definitively while avoiding an open surgical procedure. Here we explore the various techniques and tools that are currently available for the treatment of gastrointestinal defects including through the scope clips, endoscopic suturing devices, over the scope clips, sealants, endoluminal stents, endoscopic suction devices, and fistula plugs. As fistulae represent the most recalcitrant of defects, we focus this editorial on a multimodal approach of treatment. This includes optimization of nutrition, treatment of infection, ablation of tracts, removal of foreign bodies, and treatment of distal obstructions. We believe that by addressing all of these factors at the time of attempted closure, the patient is optimized and has the best chance at long-term closure. However, even with all of these factors addressed, failure does occur and in those cases, endoscopic therapies may still play a role in that they allow the patient to avoid a definitive surgical therapy for a time while nutrition is optimized, and infections are addressed.

Literature Analysis of the Treatment of Benign Esophageal Disease with Stent

To analyze the efficacy and safety of benign esophageal disease used biodegradable (BD) stent or metal stent. The English literatures of benign esophageal disease that were treated by biodegradable or metal stents implantation were retrieved and summarized. In all 323 benign esophageal disease, the most common etiologies were benign refractory stricture, surgical anastomotic stricture and esophageal fistula/leak/perforation, but the main characteristics between the two groups were not significantly different. One hundred fifty-four cases were completely healed by using BD stents or self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) (47.7 %). Clinical success was achieved in 47.7 % of all patients and there was no significant difference between BD stents (51 %) and SEMS (46.2 %) (P = 0.472), while stent migration occurred more frequently with SEMS (33.9 %) than with BD stent (19.6 %) (P ≤ 0.05), and tissue in- or overgrowth occurred more frequently with SEMS (22.2 %) than with BD stents (8.8 %) (P ≤ 0.05). Furthermore, the time about degradation of BD stents in esophageal was longer than removal of SEMS from the esophagus (P ≤ 0.05). Placement of BD stents or SEMS provides effective and safe relief for benign esophageal disease. Clinical success and mortality were not significantly different. BD stents offers an advantage of fewer complications. Although stent placement is a viable strategy in patients with benign esophageal disease, the ideal treatment strategy and further randomized trials with large number of patients are needed.

Clinical outcomes of self-expandable stent placement for benign esophageal diseases: A pooled analysis of the literature

AIM

To analyze the outcomes of self-expandable stent placement for benign esophageal strictures and benign esophageal leaks in the literature.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles published between January 2000 and July 2014. Eight prospective studies were identified that analyzed the outcomes of stent placement for refractory benign esophageal strictures. The outcomes of stent placement for benign esophageal leaks, perforations and fistulae were extracted from 20 retrospective studies that were published after the inclusion period of a recent systematic review. Data were pooled and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FC SEMS) (n = 85), biodegradable (BD) stents (n = 77) and self-expandable plastic stents (SEPS) (n = 70) were inserted in 232 patients with refractory benign esophageal strictures. The overall clinical success rate was 24.2% and according to stent type 14.1% for FC SEMS, 32.9% for BD stents and 27.1% for SEPS. Stent migration occurred in 24.6% of cases. The overall complication rate was 31.0%, including major (17.7%) and minor (13.4%) complications. A total of 643 patients were treated with self-expandable stents mainly for postsurgical leaks (64.5%), iatrogenic perforations (19.6%), Boerhaave's syndrome (7.8%) and fistulae (3.7%). FC SEMS and partially covered SEMS were used in the majority of patients. Successful closure of the defect was achieved in 76.8% of patients and according to etiology in 81.4% for postsurgical leaks, 86.0% for perforations and 64.7% for fistulae. The pooled stent migration rate was 16.5%. Stent-related complications occurred in 13.4% of patients, including major (7.8%) and minor (5.5%) complications.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of stent placement for refractory benign esophageal strictures were poor. However, randomized trials are needed to put this into perspective. The evidence on successful stent placement for benign esophageal leaks, perforations and fistulae is promising.

Predictors for failure of stent treatment for benign esophageal perforations - a single center 10-year experience

AIM: To investigate possible predictors for failed self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) therapy in consecutive patients with benign esophageal perforation-rupture (EPR).

METHODS: All patients between 2003-2013 treated for EPR at the Karolinska University Hospital, a tertiary referral center, were studied with regard to initial management with SEMS. Patients with malignancy as an underlying cause and those with anastomotic leakages were excluded. Sealing of the perforation with a covered SEMS was the primary strategy whenever feasible. Stent therapy failure was defined as a radical change of treatment strategy due to uncontrolled mediastinitis, which in this setting consisted of emergency esophagectomy with end-esophagostomy or death as a consequence of the perforation and subsequent uncontrolled sepsis. Patient and lesion characteristics were analyzed and are presented as median and interquartile range. Possible predictors for failed stent therapy were analyzed with uni-variate logistic regression, while variables with P < 0.2 were further analyzed with multi-variate logistic regression.

RESULTS: Of the total number of 48 patients presenting with EPR, 40 patients (83.3%) were treated with SEMS at the time of admission, with an intention to heal the perforation. Twenty-three patients had Boerhaave’s syndrome (58%), 16 had an iatrogenic perforation (40%) and 1 had external trauma to the esophagus (3%). The total in-hospital mortality, including the cases that had other initial treatments (n = 8), was 10.4% and 7.5% among those who were subjected to the SEMS-based strategy. In 33 of the 40 patients (82.5%) who were treated with stent, the EPR healed without further change in treatment strategy. Patients classified as treatment success received a SEMS at a median time of 1 (1-1) d after the actual EPR, compared to 3 (1-10) d among those where the initial treatment failed, P = 0.039 in uni-variate analysis and P = 0.052 in multi-variate analysis. No other significant factors emerged, indicating an increased risk for failure. Six of 7 patients, where stent treatment of the defect failed, underwent an emergency esophagectomy with end esophagostomy and one patient died.

CONCLUSION: SEMS as an upfront therapeutic strategy seems to be a successful concept, when applied to an unselected group of patients with EPR.

Optimal approach to the management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Recently, endoscopic interventions (eg, esophageal stenting) have been successfully used for the management of intrathoracic leak. The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the safety and efficacy of techniques used in the management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed to identify eligible studies analyzing management of intrathoracic esophageal leak following esophagectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative anastomotic drain placement was associated with earlier identification and resolution of anastomotic leak (mean 23.4 vs 80.7 days). In addition, reinforcement of the anastomosis with omentoplasty may reduce the incidence of anastomotic leak by nearly 50%. Endoscopic stent placement was associated with leak resolution in 72%; fatal complications were reported, however, and safety remains to be proven. Negative pressure therapy, a potentially useful tool, requires further study. If stenting and wound vacuum are used, undrained mediastinal contamination and persistent leak require surgical intervention.

Gastro-bronchial fistula closed by endoscopic fistula plug (with video)

BACKGROUND

Fistulae between the tracheobronchial tree and the gastric conduit post-esophagectomy are a rare but sometimes fatal complication. Clinical presentation can range from asymptomatic to acute pulmonary decompensation. Traditional management options, such as esophageal exclusion alone or combined with transthoracic fistula division, and closure (with tissue interposition), are highly invasive, technically difficult, and associated with variable success rates. This video presents closure of highly complex, chronic esophagobronchial fistula (EBF) using simultaneous bronchoscopic and upper endoscopic techniques.

METHODS

Diagnostic bronchoscopy and upper endoscopy are performed to assess the size and location of fistulae. Fistulae with sufficient luminal size to accommodate a biologic plug were selected for treatment. Steps of EBF plug insertion. (1) Wire across fistula with ends exposed through the mouth. (2) Delivery sheath passed across wire from bronchial side to esophageal side (3) Plug loaded on the esophageal side of the sheath. (4) Plug pulled into position across the fistula from esophageal to bronchial side. (5) Delivery sheath released from bronchial side.

RESULTS

Two of four fistulae were suitable for plug therapy. A temporary covered-stent was placed to help maintain the plugs in place. Endoscopy at 1 month showed healing of the plugged fistula following stent removal. Respiratory symptoms were improved with no further episodes of pneumonia. Over course of 2 years, the patient has required three additional endoscopic procedures to control new fistulae from this broad area of exposed lung paranchyma, but the initial fistula plug repair is durable.

CONCLUSION

Post-esophagectomy fistula is a morbid complication and the surgical treatments available are highly morbid and have variable success rates. Due to the development of new endoscopic technologies, the endotherapy has assumed new prominence for treatment of enteric fistula. This complex case illustrates feasibility of endoscopic fistula treatment using dual scope, biologic plug application which effectively controlled this patient's EBF symptoms.

Treatment of esophageal leaks, fistulae, and perforations with temporary stents: evaluation of efficacy, adverse events, and factors associated with successful outcomes

BACKGROUND

Factors associated with successful endoscopic therapy with temporary stents for esophageal leaks, fistulae, and perforations (L/F/P) are not well known.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of esophageal stenting in these patients and identify factors associated with successful closure.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

All patients with attempted stent placement for esophageal L/F/P between January 2003 and May 2012.

INTERVENTION

Esophageal stent placement and removal.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Factors predictive of therapeutic success defined as complete closure after index stent removal (primary closure) or after further endoscopic stenting (secondary closure).

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients with 132 attempted stents for esophageal L/F/P were considered; 13 patients were excluded. Among the remaining 54 patients, 117 stents were placed for leaks (29 patients; 64 stents), fistulae (15 patients; 36 stents), and perforations (10 patients; 17 stents). Procedural technical success was achieved in all patients (100%). Primary closure was successful in 40 patients (74%) and secondary closure in an additional 5 (83% overall). On short-term (<3 months) follow-up, 27 patients (50%) were asymptomatic, whereas 22 (41%) had technical adverse events, including stent migration in 15 patients (28%). Factors associated with successful primary closure include a shorter time between diagnosis of esophageal L/F/P and initial stent insertion (9.03 vs 22.54 days; P = .003), and a smaller luminal opening size (P = .002).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective, single-center study.

CONCLUSIONS

Temporary stents are safe and effective in treating esophageal L/F/P. Defect opening size and time from diagnosis to stent placement appear to be candidate predictors for successful closure.

Role of endoscopic stents and selective minimal access drainage in oesophageal leaks: feasibility and outcome

BACKGROUND

Leaks following oesophageal surgery are considered to be amongst the most dreaded complications and contributory to postoperative mortality. Controversies still exist regarding the best option for the management of oesophageal leaks due to lack of standardized treatment protocols. This study was designed to analyse the feasibility outcome and complications associated with placement of removable, fully covered, self-expanding metallic stents for oesophageal leaks with concomitant minimally invasive drainage when appropriate.

METHODS

The study group included 32 patients from a prospectively maintained database of oesophageal leaks, with the majority being anastomotic leaks after minimally invasive oesophagectomy (n = 28), followed by laparoscopic cardiomyotomy (n = 3) and extended total gastrectomy (n = 1). The procedures took place between March 2007 and April 2013.

RESULTS

Most patients had an intrathoracic leak (n = 22), with a mean time to detection of the leak following surgery of 7.50 days (SD = 2.23). Subsequent to endoscopic stenting, enteral feeding via a nasojejunal tube was started on the second day and oral feeding was delayed until the 14th day (n = 31). Six patients underwent thoracoscopic (n = 5) or laparoscopic drainage (n = 1) along with stenting for significant mediastinal and intra-abdominal contamination. The stent migration rate of our study was 8.54%. The overall success in terms of preventing mortality was 96%.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic stenting should be considered a primary option for managing oesophageal leaks. Delayed oral intake may reduce the incidence of stent migration. Larger stents (bariatric or colorectal stents) serve as a useful option in case of migrated stents. Combined minimally invasive procedures can be safely adapted in appropriate clinical circumstances and may contribute to better outcomes.

Simultaneous pneumonectomy and esophagectomy in an elderly patient

Reports of simultaneous pneumonectomy and esophagectomy for synchronous lung and esophageal carcinoma are extremely rare. We report on a 64-year-old male patient with lung adenocarcinoma who was originally scheduled to undergo a left pneumonectomy. During the operation, an esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was discovered in the mid-thoracic esophagus. Thus, a simultaneous left pneumonectomy and esophagectomy was performed, and part of the pericardium was sutured to the tunica adventitia of the descending aorta using a "net-making" method for prevention postoperative dilatation of the stomach.

Covered self-expanding stent treatment for anastomotic leakage: outcomes in esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage of esophagogastric and esophagojejunal anastomoses is a severe complication after esophagectomy and gastrectomy associated with a high mortality. We conducted this non-randomized observational study to evaluate the outcomes and clinical effectiveness of covered self-expanding stents (CSESs) in treating esophageal anastomotic leakage.

METHODS

From 2002 to 2013, consecutive patients with anastomotic leakage after esophagogastrostomy or esophagojejunostomy who received CSESs were analyzed concerning leakage characteristics, leakage sealing rate, success and failure rates of CSES treatment, stent-related complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

In 35 patients, anastomotic leakage originating from 5 cervical esophagogastrostomies, 6 thoracic esophagogastrostomies, 12 mediastinal esophagojejunostomies and 12 abdominal esophagojejunostomies were treated with 48 CSESs (16 fully CSES, 32 partially CSES). Of 35 patients, 24 received one stent, 9 received two consecutive stents, and 2 received three consecutive stents. Stent-related complications occurred in 71 % of patients (25/35). The most frequent complications were leakage persistence (44 %) and stent dislocation (19 %). Sealing of the anastomotic leakage was achieved in 24 (69 %) patients after a median (range) stenting time of 19 (1-78) days. Sealing rates differed significantly with 20 % (cervical esophagogastrostomies), 50 % (thoracic esophagogastrostomies), 92 % (mediastinal esophagojejunostomies) and 67 % (abdominal esophagojejunostomies) of patients (p = 0.023). Moreover, clinical success rates differed among these groups (60 vs. 67 vs. 92 vs. 58 %; p = 0.247). Clinical failure of stent treatment was more likely to be recognized in early postoperative leakage (median postoperative day 3 vs. 8; p = 0.098) compared with successful treatment, whereas no difference for clinical success rates was found comparing leakage ≤ 10 versus >10 mm (68 vs. 64 %; p = 0.479).

CONCLUSION

CSESs are an effective treatment for anastomotic leakage in patients with esophagogastrostomies and esophagojejunostomies. Best results can be achieved in patients with anastomotic leakages following mediastinal esophagojejunostomy, and in leakages occurring after the very early postoperative phase.