Rectangular Collimation and Radiographic Efficacy in Eight General Dental Practices in the West Midlands

Comparison of technical errors in pediatric bitewing radiographs acquired with round vs rectangular collimation

OBJECTIVE

To compare technical errors in bitewing radiographs acquired with round vs rectangular collimation in a hospital-based pediatric dentistry training program.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective chart review was conducted of 176 digital bitewing radiographs exposed with round collimation and 106 exposed with rectangular collimation. The number of re-exposures was calculated, and errors in central ray entry (CRE; "cone cuts"), horizontal and vertical positioning, and angulation were measured.

RESULTS

There were no greater re-exposures but significantly more CRE errors with rectangular collimation (21.7%; n = 23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.9%-30.0%) than with round collimation (3.4%; n = 6; 95% CI, 0.7%-6.1%). CRE error location, horizontal positioning errors, and size of horizontal overlapped contacts were statistically different but not clinically important.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of rectangular collimation resulted in increased CRE errors but no other clinically significant problems. This technique should be used to reduce radiation exposure to patients.

Estimation of x-ray radiation related cancers in US dental offices: Is it worth the risk?

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to estimate the possible number of cancer cases produced during 2019 in US dental offices from radiography, estimate the possible reduction in those rates resulting from use of intraoral rectangular collimation and selection criteria, and determine the frequency and quality of website radiation risk information and informed consent forms.

STUDY DESIGN

An analysis of dental radiation examinations in 2014 to 2015 US national survey data, Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends, and National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements surveys was performed, in addition to an analysis of 2008 to 2020 Journal of Clinical Orthodontics national orthodontic surveys for radiographic examination frequencies. Lifetime attributable cancer risk estimates from US and European studies were used to generate the total dental and orthodontic office cancer totals. In total, 150 offices were examined online for the quality and frequency of risk information in websites and consent forms.

RESULTS

The 2019 estimate for all office cancers is 967. Collimation and selection criteria could reduce this to 237 cancer cases. Most cancers arise from intraoral and cone beam computed tomography examinations, with 135 orthodontic cancers over 21 months (average treatment time). Collimation and selection criteria could reduce this to 68. Only 1% of offices use collimators or informed consent for radiography. The website and consent information were of poor quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Dentists are not following selection criteria or using collimators according to guidelines. Up to 75% of cancer cases could be avoided.

A comparison between bitewing radiographs taken with rectangular and circular collimators in UK military dental practices: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine any increase in the incidence of cone cut errors that adversely affected diagnostic yield resulting in more retakes using rectangular collimation with film holders in bitewing radiography. Comparisons were also made with other positioning errors that occurred when bitewings were taken with circular collimation, with and without film holders.

METHODS

A preliminary questionnaire was used to determine the year that rectangular collimation was adopted by military dental practice. 3 time-framed subsets, each of 1000 bitewing radiographs, were identified: subset 1, films taken with circular collimators without film holders; subset 2, films taken with circular collimators with film holders; and subset 3, films taken with rectangular collimators with film holders. Each subset was assessed for positioning errors of cone cut, horizontal overlap, vertical distortion and film centring. The χ(2) test was used to test significant differences amongst the three subsets.

RESULTS

The use of film holders with circular collimation significantly reduced the incidence of cone cut errors from 21.7% to 3.3%. There was an increase in the incidence of cone cut errors from 3.3% to 20.9% when rectangular collimation was used, but the actual number considered "rejects" was very small, only 0.1% (1 in 1000 films) in subset 2 and 0.3% (3 of 1000 films) in subset 3, when assessed for diagnostic yield.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that rectangular collimation did not significantly affect the diagnostic yield of bitewing radiographs despite the presence of cone cut. Therefore, all practitioners should adopt rectangular collimation.

A randomized double blinded study to assess the efficacy of a laser-guided collimator on dental radiography training

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of a laser-guided collimator in intraoral radiography training.

METHODS

A custom-made collimator with four red laser diodes on each corner on the rim of an aluminium alloy cubic housing was fabricated. The laser used low power diodes, which are classified as laser-safe by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). When activated, the effective dimensions of the laser beams were 4 cm x 4.5 cm. Eighteen dental hygiene students were randomized into test and control groups. The Laser group used a rectangular collimator with the laser device, while the Non-laser group used a conventional rectangular collimator. Each group attended nine intraoral radiography training sessions. All radiographs were assessed and were classified into three categories: Excellent, Acceptable and Repeat, by a masked academic staff member. Reasons for repeats were marked. Statistical comparisons between the two groups were made.

RESULTS

A total of 2334 radiographs were made. Conecut was more common on bitewings than periapicals. The Laser group produced fewer conecuts than the Non-laser group. The Laser group produced more excellent radiographs with fewer repeats than the Non-laser group, but there was not a significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

The laser-guided collimator helped the students to produce fewer repeats in a shorter period of time. It was an effective training aid.

Assessing the quality of radiographic processing in general dental practice

OBJECTIVES

To determine if a commercial device (Vischeck) for monitoring film processing quality was a practical option in general dental practice, and to assess processing quality among a group of GDPs in the West Midlands with this device.

DESIGN

Clinical evaluation.

SETTING

General dental practice, UK, 2004.

METHOD

Ten GDP volunteers from a practice based research group processed Vischeck strips (a) when chemicals were changed, (b) one week later, and (c) immediately before the next change of chemicals. These were compared with strips processed under ideal conditions. Additionally, a series of duplicate radiographs were produced and processed together with Vischeck strips in progressively more dilute developer solutions to compare the change in radiograph quality assessed clinically with that derived from the Vischeck.

RESULTS

The Vischeck strips suggested that at the time chosen for change of processing chemicals, eight dentists had been processing films well beyond the point indicated for replacement. Solutions were changed after a wide range of time periods and number of films processed. The calibration of the Vischeck strip correlated closely to a clinical assessment of acceptable film quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Vischeck strips are a useful aid to monitoring processing quality in automatic developers in general dental practice. Most of this group of GDPs were using chemicals beyond the point at which diagnostic yield would be affected.