An Investigation into Merseyside General Dental Practitioners’ Interest in Primary Care Research, Their Views on Research and Their Training Needs

Willingness of general dental practices in South East London to engage with research

This study assessed the willingness of general dental practices (GDPs) to participate in research. All 263 GDPs in South East London that provide dental care under National Health Service (NHS) contracts were invited. The survey instrument was adapted from previous studies and piloted before administration. Geographical factors and practice characteristics associated with willingness to participate in research were explored in logistic regression models. A total of 77 responses were received (response rate: 29%). Of them, 40 (53%) expressed interest in being involved in primary care research. They saw their main role as collecting data and facilitating access to patients. Time, bureaucracy and lack of energy were the main reasons behind a decision not to engage with research. Those spending more time in NHS services were more likely to be willing to participate in research. Other possible indicators were single-handed GDPs, participation in the dental foundation training programme and location in more affluent areas.

Factors influencing the career aspirations and preferred modes of working in recent dental graduates in Wales

INTRODUCTION

In England and Wales, National Health Service (NHS) primary dental care services are now commissioned on a local basis. In planning for the future, it is important that commissioning authorities have a clear understanding of the perspectives of recent dental graduates: vocational dental practitioners (VDPs).

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the career aspirations and preferred modes of working of VDPs in Wales.

METHODOLOGY

Data were collected via a postal questionnaire, comprising 37 closed and open questions, mailed to all 59 VDPs in Wales.

RESULTS

A total of 53 (90%) VDPs participated, of whom 47 saw their future in general dental practice: 5, 35, and 7 indicating a preference to work in the NHS, mixed (NHS and private), and private sector, respectively. None selected the Community Dental Service as their preferred vocation. More than half of all respondents intended to undertake a postgraduate qualification within the next five years and 22 wished to specialise. Of the 53 VDPs, 44 were concerned that lack of NHS contracts would limit where they could practise, and agreed that family and other social commitments were a significant influence on choice of practice location. Access to high-quality premises and continuing professional development were agreed as important by 41 VDPs. A majority (37) agreed that private dentistry was an attractive alternative to NHS dentistry. Of the respondents, 38 (22 females, 16 males) expected to work part-time at some point in the future and 14 said they would consider a career outside dentistry. Only nine VDPs agreed that they would be happy working in a single-handed practice and even fewer (six) indicated they would be happy working for a corporate body.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous factors impact on the career aspirations of VDPs. These factors have been quantified in this study, and healthcare-commissioning bodies need to be aware of them when planning future dental care provision in Wales.

The views of dentists on their participation in a primary care-based research trial

AIMS

To determine the attitudes and opinions of dentists undertaking research in primary care dental practices, about the value of research in primary care.

METHOD

The data were collected during a face-to-face interview utilising a schedule of open and closed questions, which were used to guide the interview.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven of the 40 primary care dentists (67.5%) who had participated in a five-year primary care clinical trial completed the interview. All the respondents believed that primary care research was important and should be of relevance to their practice, but only 12 (44%) thought it was important they carried out this research. The majority (96%) of respondents felt it did not pay financially to do research as a primary care practitioner and 12 (44%) thought research in primary care was too time consuming, but 25 (92%) were prepared to get involved in a primary care research group. Five (56%) salaried service (SS) practitioners and 14 (78%) general dental services (GDS) dentists felt they did not have enough experience, skills or knowledge to conduct their own research. Significantly more salaried dentists compared with GDS dentists felt adequately supported to do primary care research.

CONCLUSION

Future research in primary care should be focused on topics primary care practitioners feel of use to their clinical practice. A method of funding practitioners and providing time for them to complete research away from their clinical duties is necessary. There is a need for collaborative working with an academic institution, which can provide training and academic support for practitioners.