Liver abscess secondary to an endoscopic tattoo in the colon

Preoperative localization of potentially invisible colonic lesions on the laparoscopic operation field: using autologous blood tattooing

PURPOSE

Preoperative colonoscopic (POC) localization is recommended for patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy for early colon cancer. Among the various localization method, POC tattooing localization has been widely used. Several dyes have been used for tattooing, but dye has disadvantages, including foreign body reactions. For this reason, we have used autologous blood tattooing for POC localization. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the autologous blood tattooing method.

METHODS

This study included patients who required POC localization of the colonic neoplasm among the patients who were scheduled for elective colon resection. The indication for localization was early colon cancer (clinically T1 or T2) or colonic neoplasms that could not be resected endoscopically. POC autologous blood tattooing was performed after saline injection, and 2 hemoclips were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients who underwent autologous blood tattooing and laparoscopic colectomy were included in this study. All POC localization sites were visible in the laparoscopic view. POC localization sites showed almost perfect agreement with intraoperative surgical findings. There were no complications like bowel perforation, peritonitis, hemoperitoneum, and mesenteric hematoma.

CONCLUSION

Autologous blood is a safe and effective agent for localizing materials that can replace previous dyes. However, a large prospective case-control study is required for the routine application of this procedure in early colon cancer or colonic neoplasms.

Spillage of endoscopic tattoo before laparoscopic colectomy: A case report and literature search

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic tattooing with India ink is a common practice before the laparoscopic resection of polyps/tumours. Sometimes, due to inadvertent intramuscular instead of submucosal injection, it may lead to peritoneal spillage precluding the laparoscopic approach and warrant open resection. There are a few reports of post-operative abdominal sepsis. We report a case where spillage led to open conversion due to poor visibility and post-operative abdominal sepsis necessitating a change of antibiotics and prolonged hospital stay. Surgeons should be aware of these complications from this apparently innocuous step. We also did a review of the literature to see how this can be prevented and what alternative approaches have been developed.

Clip or Tattooing: A Comparative Study for Preoperative Colon Cancer Endoscopic Localization

Background and Aim

Preoperative endoscopic markers have been extensively used for the localization of colonic neoplastic lesions in laparoscopic surgery. We conducted this respective cohort study to compare the localization accuracy of two commonly used endoscopic marker strategies (endoscopic clip plus abdominal plain film and endoscopic tattooing).

Methods

Patients who received preoperative colonoscopy localization for colonic neoplasia and underwent an elective laparoscopic operation afterward between 2013 and 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The localization accuracy of the two endoscopic strategies was compared, and the predictors of successful endoscopic localization were identified by multivariate regression.

Results

In total, 195 patients [average age 62.4 ± 9.2 years, 123 male (63.1%)] undergoing preoperative colonoscopy localization and subsequent laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasms were included. Endoscopic localization was finally proven to be successful in 150 (76.9%) patients in the surgery. Compared to the tattooing group, patients who had successful localization for colonic lesions were fewer in the clip group (64 of 101 cases, 63.4% vs. 86 of 94 cases, 91.5%, p < 0.001). The multivariate regression analysis showed that the endoscopic tattooing strategy, endoscopic clip strategy, and lesion location were all predictors for successful localization (all with p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Compared with endoscopic clip plus abdominal plain film, endoscopic tattooing had higher localization accuracy and less intraoperative colonoscopy counseling; the endoscopic clip strategy, tattooing strategy, and colonic lesion location were all predictors of successful endoscopic localization.

Clinical application of carbon nanoparticles in lymphatic mapping during colorectal cancer surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the overall performance of carbon nanoparticles (CNs) for detecting lymph nodes (LNs) and node metastasis during colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

The English and Chinese literature was searched until 29 April 2020. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for colorectal resection and LN dissection that compared the use of CNs with a blank control in colorectal cancer surgery. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed, and a meta-analysis was conducted using ReviewManager 5.3 and Stata 15.1 software.

RESULTS

A total of 17 RCTs comprising 1241 patients were included for analysis. Compared with the outcomes of the blank controls, the use of CNs resulted in an average of 5.21 more LNs per patient (weighted mean difference = 5.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.14-6.29, p < 0.001) and a 68% higher detection rate of micro LNs (relative risk [RR] = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.38-2.04, p < 0.001). In addition, more metastatic LNs were identified in stained nodes (RR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.40-1.75, p < 0.001), but the total detection rate of metastatic nodes did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

CN is an effective lymphatic tracer in colorectal cancer surgeries. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.