Primary urethral reconstruction results in penile fracture

Summary Paper of the Updated 2023 European Association of Urology Guidelines on Urological Trauma

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel for Urological Trauma has produced guidelines in order to assist medical professionals in the management of urological trauma in adults for the past 20 yr. It must be emphasised that clinical guidelines present the best evidence available to the experts, but following guideline recommendations will not necessarily result in the best outcome. Guidelines can never replace clinical expertise when making treatment decisions for individual patients regarding other parameters such as experience and available facilities. Guidelines are not mandates and do not purport to be a legal standard of care.

OBJECTIVE

To present a summary of the 2023 version of the EAU guidelines on the management of urological trauma.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature search was conducted from 1966 to 2022, and articles with the highest certainty evidence were selected. It is important to note that due to its nature, genitourinary trauma literature still relies heavily on expert opinion and retrospective series.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Databases searched included Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries, covering a time frame between May 1, 2021 and April 29, 2022. A total of 1236 unique records were identified, retrieved, and screened for relevance.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines provide an evidence-based approach for the management of urological trauma.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Trauma is a serious public health problem with significant social and economic costs. Urological trauma is common; traffic accidents, falls, intrapersonal violence, and iatrogenic injuries are the main causes. Developments in technology, continuous training of medical professionals, and improved care of polytrauma patients reduce morbidity and maximise the opportunity for quick recovery.

The presentation and outcomes of penile fracture with associated urethral injury: A systematic literature review

PURPOSES

Penile fracture (PF) with associated urethral injury has been described as a rare condition yet a serious urological emergency. We conducted this systematic review to address the current literature concerning the etiology, presentations, intra-operative findings, site of injury, and complications of PF with associated urethral injury, Materials and Methods: The present systematic review was limited to human-based studies published in English language, and reporting clinical data on PF cases with associated urethral injuries. A comprehensive search of the literature was conducted on five electronic databases from their inception to May 2022: Medline via PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, and EBSCO host.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies were included encompassing 1671 patients with PF. Out of 1665 patients with PF retrieved from the case series studies, 65 patients had associated urethral injuries giving a point prevalence of 3.9%. The vast majority of the patients had blood on the meatus and hematuria suggestive of urethral injury (57/59; 96.6%). Forty patients had partial urethral disruption and the rest of the patients had a complete rupture. All patients received primary urethroplasty as the main modality of treatment. The median hospital stay was two days and the median duration of transurethral catheterization was 21 days. Five patients (8.5%) developed urethral stricture; other complications included penile curvature (6.7%), palpable fibrosis (6.7%), and erectile dysfunction (3.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Urethral injuries are uncommon, but serious findings, in patients with PF. Primary urethroplasty appears to achieve satisfactory outcomes with a low incidence of short and long-term complications.

Urethral rupture concomitant with penile fracture does not adversely affect functional outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to identify possible risk factors for urethral rupture and to evaluate the effect of urethral rupture repair on long-term functional outcomes and complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of consecutive penile fracture patients were retrospectively reviewed. Penile fracture patients with and without urethral rupture were compared according to demographics, clinical and intraoperative findings. Comparisons of postoperative functional results of the groups were performed using the 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Finally, among them, long-term penile complications including penile curvature, painful erection, palpable nodule, and paresthesia were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients participated. Patients with urethral rupture (n = 8) were older (44.50 ± 10.69, 36.58 ± 10.33 years, p = 0.052). There was no significant difference in fracture etiology (p = 0.64). Urethral bleeding was present only in patients with urethral rupture (p < 0.001). Although no bilateral corpus cavernosum rupture was encountered in penile fracture patients without urethral rupture, this rate was significantly higher in those with urethral rupture at a rate of 62.5% (p < 0.001). The time from surgical repair to sexual activity was similar in both groups (p = 0.66). There was no significant difference in IPSS and IIEF-5 scores, the presence of erectile dysfunction and complication rates (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Older age is a possible risk factor for a concomitant urethral rupture with penile fracture and it seems to be associated with urethral bleeding and bilateral corpus cavernosum involvement. Additionally, urethral rupture repair neither adversely affected functional outcomes nor increased penile complication rates.

Penile Fractures: Evaluation and Management

Penile fracture is a urologic injury with an etiology that varies based on the cultural milieu. Diagnosis can be made based on history and physical examination alone. Patients should be evaluated with RUG or cystoscopy when urethral injury is suspected. Ultrasound or MRI is a helpful adjunct when the diagnosis is unclear, and can assist in identifying the location of the rupture. Surgical management is favored over conservative measures to improve outcomes. Delayed surgical repair may not be inferior to immediate intervention.

Bilateral Corpus Cavernosum and Complete Urethral Rupture: A Double Trouble

Penile fracture is a rare urologic emergency. The main finding is a partial disruption of one or both cavernosal bodies due to blunt trauma of the penis during an erection. Complete or partial injury of the urethra may accompany the penile fracture but complete urethral rupture is rarely encountered. In this study, we present the management of a penile fracture case with disruption of both corpus cavernosum with total urethral rupture.

Tri-tubular penile fracture: A case of complete rupture of urethra and bilateral corpus cavernosa

INTRODUCTION

Tri-tubular penile fracture is a very rare subset of penile fractures, typically due to high-energy trauma to the erect penis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 26-year-old healthy man presents with a triad of audible crack, immediate detumescence, and hematoma formation, following blunt trauma sustained during vaginal sexual intercourse. A diagnosis of penile fracture is made, with intraoperative finding of a complete traumatic transection of the urethra with total bilateral corpus cavernosa disruption. Both corpora cavernosa were repaired using 2/0 polydioxanone sutures, with the dartos fascia placed in between. The urethra was repaired with interrupted 5/0 polyglactin braided absorbable suture. At 5 weeks, patient reported normal erections and sexual activity with no physical or psychological issues. The literature on management was reviewed.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence of surgical management of tri-tubular penile fractures remains predominantly expert opinion, due to difficulties of conducting prospective trials for a rare condition.

Findings regarding non-sexual penile fracture in a referral emergency hospital

Purpose:

To describe penile fracture (PF) findings with non-sexual etiology in a referral emergency hospital, with emphasis on demographic data, clinical and intraoperative findings and long-term outcomes.

Materials and Methods:

Patients with PF of non-sexual cause operated at our institution from January 2014 to January 2019 were submitted to surgical treatment and monitored for at least three months after surgery. Etiology of trauma, epidemiological and clinical presentation data, time to intervention and operative findings were reviewed retrospectively. The evaluation of postoperative erectile function was carried out by filling out the International Index of Erection Function - 5 (IIEF-5). The tool used to assess urinary function was the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire.

Results:

Of a total of 149 patients submitted to surgical treatment for PF, 18 (12%) reported non-sexual etiology. Twelve (66.6%) cases were due to penile manipulation through the act of bending the penis during morning erection, three (16.6%) when rolling over in bed with erect penis, one (5.5%) when embracing the wife during erection, one (5.5%) to laying on the partner with erect penis and the other (5.5%) when sitting on the toilet with an erection. Operative findings were unilateral corpus cavernosum injury in all cases. Only one (5.5%) patient had a partial urethral lesion. Follow-up time varied from 3 to 18 months (mean, 10.1 months). Three (16.6%) patients developed erectile dysfunction six months after surgery. However, all of them responded to treatment with IPDE-5 and reported improvement of erection, with no need for medication, on reevaluation after 18 months. One (5.5%) patient developed penile curvature < 30 degrees. Thirteen (72.2%) patients developed penile nodules. No patient presented voiding complaints during follow-up.

Conclusions:

PF is a rare urologic emergency, especially with the non-sexual etiology. However, PF should always be considered when the clinical presentation is suggestive, regardless of the etiology. Penile manipulation and roll over in bed were the most common non-sexual causes. These cases are related to low-energy traumas, usually leading to unilateral rupture of corpus cavernosum. Urethral involvement is uncommon but may be present. Early treatment has good long-term clinical outcome, especially when performed in specialized centers with extensive experience in FP.

A Modified Endoscopic Primary Realignment of Severe Bulbar Urethral Injury

Purpose: Male urethral injury is a common urologic emergency in developing countries. Whether early or late treatment of urethral injuries is often multifactorial and controversial. The goal of this study is to determine whether early realignment can reduce postsurgical complications and evaluate the clinical feasibility of emergency endoscopic urethroplasty using single rigid ureteroscopy in the treatment of bulbar urethral severe injury. Patients and Methods: Between September 2013 and March 2019, 15 male adult patients (mean age 35 years; from 21 to 62 years) with severe bulbar urethral injury were enrolled into the current study. The patients mainly presented with dysuria or painful urination (15/15, 100%), urethral bleeding (13/15, 86.7%), and urinary retention (11/15, 73.3%). Six of them had swelling of perineal or scrotal soft tissue, while four had testicular contusion. No pelvic fracture was found in all cases with CT scanning of the pelvic cavity. The bulbar urethral at grade IV was confirmed to be completely ruptured in all cases by endoscopy during operation. The modified endoscopic primary realignment was performed. Results: This new urethral repair technique was effectively performed in all patients and none converted to open operation. Mean operation time was 42.3 ± 11.5 minutes (28-52 minutes) and the mean Foley catheter indwelling time was 34.5 ± 6.9 days (28-42 days). During a follow-up of 41.3 ± 22.8 months (12-64 months), mild urethral strictures (grade I) (19.7 ± 9.5 weeks, 10-27 weeks postsurgery) developed in 8 patients (53.3%) and then were all improved 2.1 ± 0.8 months (1.3-2.9 months) after periodic dilatations of the urethra (4-10 times). Erectile dysfunction (ED) occurred in three patients (20%) after surgery, who recovered from mild ED to normal by administration with oral sildenafil (100 mg, three times a week) for 12 weeks. The International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) score was significantly improved after surgery (M ± SD, 25 ± 3) compared with before (16.4 ± 3.5) (p < 0.05). No incontinence and other complications occurred in all cases. Conclusions: Early endoscopic realignment via suprapubic puncture cystostomy by single rigid ureteroscopy provides an effective, feasible, and safe procedure for severe bulbar urethral injury.

Repair of urethral injury associated with penile fracture using buccal mucosa graft: A novel therapeutic approach for complex cases

Penile fracture is a rare urological emergency caused by blunt trauma to the erect penis and it may be accompanied by urethral injury. Complete urethral rupture is very uncommon and is usually managed by primary anastomosis. However, these patients are more likely to develop post-operative complications such as urethral strictures. Buccal mucosa graft is commonly used for substitution urethroplasty in management of urethral strictures, but its use has not been reported for immediate treatment in the setting of penile fracture. We report a patient with rupture of both corpora cavernosa, as well as the rupture of the urethra, after sexual intercourse. Buccal mucosa graft was used for surgical repair of urethral injury. At 36-month follow-up patient did not experience erectile or voiding problems. The application of this technique could possibly reduce the incidence of urethral strictures in these patients and further prospective studies with larger samples should be conducted.

Urethral injury in penile fracture: a narrative review

Objective

To present the evolution and the recent data on the etiology, diagnosis, management and outcomes of penile fracture (PF) with concomitant urethral injury.

Materials and Methods

We searched the Pubmed database between 1998 and 2019 using the following key words: “penile fracture”, “fracture of penis”, “trauma to penis”, “rupture of corpora cavernosa”, “urethral injury”, “urethral rupture” and “urethral reconstruction”.

Results

The incidence of urethral lesion in patients with PF varies by geographic region and etiology. Blood in the meatus, hematuria and voiding symptoms are highly indicative of urethral rupture. The diagnosis of PF is eminently clinical and complementary exams are not necessary. The treatment consists of urethral reconstruction and the most common complications found are urethral stenosis and urethrocutaneous fistula.

Conclusion

PF is an uncommon urological emergency, particularly in cases with urethral involvement. Urethral injury should be suspected in the presence of suggestive clinical signs, and diagnosis is usually clinical. Urgent urethral reconstruction is mandatory and produces satisfactory results with low levels of complications.

Penile Fracture: Delayed Presentation, Primary Urethral Repair and Satisfactory Outcome

Penile fracture is a relatively rare condition warranting emergency intervention. The commonest etiological factor remains coital activities, which explains why it is being underreported. Presentation is usually delayed and up to 38% of cases present with associated urethral injury. Prompt surgical intervention and primary urethral repair are associated with a good outcome. We present a 30-year-old male with unilateral penile fracture and associated urethral injury following sexual intercourse.