Haematomas after carotid endarterectomy can be reduced by direct pressure to the neck postoperatively

A Stepwise Haemostasis Intraoperative Protocol Driven Reduction of Haematoma Rate Following Symptomatic Carotidendarterectomy

INTRODUCTION

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for symptomatic stenosis reduces further stroke risk. Post-CEA haematoma increases the risk of complications including stroke. There are few studies considering protocols aimed at reducing post-CEA haematoma rates. Presented are the outcomes of a protocol developed to reduce this surgical complication.

METHOD

The protocol was implemented in 112 consecutive CEA. It involves stepwise additional measures to ensure haemostasis before wound closure. Attention to bleeding points is followed by light compression for 10 min. Protamine is then given if haemostasis has not been achieved. If after 20 min the problem persists Tranexamic acid is given. Following a further 20 min if haemostasis is not yet achieved a platelet transfusion is undertaken. Haematoma rates, return to theatre for post-operative haematoma and other complications were compared with 100 consecutive pre-protocol introduction CEA cases.

RESULTS

Of 112 CEA patients, 19 received protamine, 8 protamine and tranexamic acid. One case required platelet transfusion. Neck haematoma rate fell from 10 to 3 cases (P = .02, OR: 0.25 [95% CI .07-.94]), of which returned to theatre for haematoma evacuation fell from 6 to 1 case (P = .03, OR: 0.14 [95% CI .02-1.19]). 30 day stroke and death rate reduced from 5% to 1.8% (P = .11, OR: 0.35 [95% CI .07-1.82]).

CONCLUSION

The stepwise haemostasis intraoperative protocol can reduce post-CEA haematoma rates.

Effect of Chronic Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Medication in Neck Haematoma and Perioperative Outomes After Carotid Endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

A retrospective analysis of neck haematoma, stroke and mortality after symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was conducted, in order to determine the most appropriate perioperative medication for these patients. Thirty-day outcomes of moderate and severe neck bleeding were also investigated.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CEA in a Vascular Surgery department were analysed (2015-2019). Pre-procedure antithrombotic medication (from the 5-days prior to surgery) was identified. End point predictors were identified by univariate and multivariable analyses and adjusted for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 304 CEA were included. Almost half of the included patients (49.67%) were under low-dose aspirin, 17.55% other single antiplatelet agent, 12.59% dual antiplatelet therapy, 8.61% anticoagulation and 10.92% no antithrombotic therapy. There was 8.22% rate of important haematoma, including 4.93% severe (requiring surgical exploration) hematomas and a 30-day all-stroke incidence of 2.94% in symptomatic and 1.79% asymptomatic patients (p=.51). When compared to aspirin, severe haematoma was more prevalent with single clopidogrel or triflusal (RR 4.25, p=.11), dual antiplatelet group (RR 11.84, p=.002) and anticoagulation (RR 8.604, p=.02). Dual antiaggregation and anticoagulation did not confer post-operative stroke protection compared to single aspirin in either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients. Non-significant higher intra-hospital mortality was noted in no medication, dual antiplatelet and anticoagulation groups in contrast to aspirin. Severe neck bleeding was associated with increased congestive heart failure (9.26-fold, p=.03) and longer hospital stay (11.20±24.69 days versus 3.18±4.79 with no bleeding, p<.001), with a tendency for higher hospital readmission at 30-days (4.66-fold, p=.13). Mortality and stroke rates were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Double antiaggregation and anticoagulation did not confer better perioperative outcomes after elective CEA in our study. These regimens were associated with increased risk of neck haematoma, especially severe bleeding, with similar rates of neurologic events in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients and no mortality benefit. Monotherapy with aspirin appears to be the safest perioperative antithrombotic regimen for elective CEA.

A Multi-Centre, Single-Arm Clinical Study to Confirm Safety and Performance of PuraStat®, for the Management of Bleeding in Elective Carotid Artery Surgery

Anastomotic bleeding in vascular surgery can be difficult to control. Patients, in particular those undergoing carotid surgery, have often been started on treatment with dual antiplatelet agents and receive systemic heparinization intraoperatively. The use of local hemostatic agents as an adjunct to conventional methods is widely reported. 3-D Matrix's absorbable hemostatic material RADA16 (PuraStat®), is a fully synthetic resorbable hemostatic agent. The aim of this study is to confirm the safety and performance of this agent when used to control intraoperative anastomotic bleeding during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). A prospective, single-arm, multicenter study involving 65 patients, undergoing CEA, in whom the hemostatic agent was applied to the suture line after removal of arterial clamps. Patients were followed up at 24 h, discharge, and one month after surgery. Time to hemostasis was measured as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included hemostasis efficacy and safety outcomes, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative administration of blood products, and incidence of reoperation for bleeding. A total of 65 cases (51 male and 14 female) undergoing CEA, utilizing patch reconstruction (90. 8%), eversion technique (6.1%), and direct closure (3.1%) were analyzed. All patients received dual antiplatelet therapy preoperatively and were administered systemic intravenous heparin intraoperatively, as per local protocol. The mean time to hemostasis was 83 s ± 105 s (95% CI: 55-110 s). Primary hemostatic efficacy was 90.8%. The mean volume of product used was 1.7 mL ± 1.1 mL. Hemostasis was achieved with a single application of the product in 49 patients (75.3%). Two patients required a transfusion of blood products intraoperatively. There were no blood product transfusions during the postoperative period. The intraoperative mean blood loss was 127 mL ± 111.4 mL and postoperatively, the total mean drainage volume was 49.0 mL ± 51.2 mL. The mean duration of surgery was 119 ± 35 min, and the mean clamp time was 35 min 12 s ± 19 min 59 s. In 90.8% of patients, there was no presence of hematoma at 24 h postoperatively. Three returned to theatre due to bleeding (2 in the first 24 h), however, none of these cases were considered product related. Overall, there were no device-related serious adverse events (SAE) or unanticipated device-related SAEs reported. Use of the hemostatic agent PuraStat® is associated with a high rate of hemostatic efficacy (90.8%) and a short time to hemostasis. The safety of the product for use on vascular anastomoses has been demonstrated.

To drain or not to drain following carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

A postoperative neck hematoma can be a life-threatening complication after carotid endarterectomy necessitating urgent surgical decompression to avoid airway compromise. The practice of routine incisional drain placement is variable with few published studies evaluating the "to drain versus not to drain" approach. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of neck drain placement for prevention of neck hematoma requiring re-exploration for decompression.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the outcome of surgical re-exploration for neck decompression among patients receiving or not receiving wound drainage.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 5 studies for inclusion, comprising 48,297 patients with 19,832 (41.1%) patients receiving a drain after carotid endarterectomy. Patients in the drain group had a significantly higher re-exploration rate after carotid endarterectomy compared to those who did not receive a drainage (OR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.03-1.49; P=0.02) with no heterogeneity (I²=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine drain placement does not offer complete protection against neck hematoma development and may give the surgeon a false sense of security in wound drainage. Thus, we conclude that drain placement following carotid endarterectomy should be selective, not routine.