Dorsal pentagonal island flap to reconstruct post-burn interdigital web

Comparison Study of 5-flap Z-Plasty and Double Z-Plasty for Interdigital Pocket Web Contractures

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the improvement in abduction and change in web slope between 5-flap z-plasty and double z-plasty for post-burn or post-trauma interdigital pocket web contractures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 16 webs in 11 patients with post-burn or post-trauma interdigital pocket web contractures. Seven patients underwent 5-flap z-plasty and 4 double z-plasty. The abduction and slope angles of the affected fingers were measured before surgery and every 3 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 36 months. The postoperative abduction angle improved in both groups. There was an increase of 19° ± 4° in the mean abduction angle after surgery in the 5-flap z-plasty group compared with a mean of 12° ± 2° in the double z-plasty group; the postoperative decrease in the web slope angle was 30° ± 5° and 22° ± 2°, respectively. All patients were able to actively move the affected webs and fingers with no pain or other discomfort.

CONCLUSIONS

Five-flap z-plasty can be considered a better alternative to double z-plasty for interdigital pocket web contractures based on the improvement in abduction angle and changes in the slope angle.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Concepts in soft-tissue reconstruction of the contracted hand and upper extremity after burn injury

Burns and their subsequent contracture result in devastating functional and aesthetic consequences which disproportionally affect the upper extremity. By focusing on reconstruction with analogous tissue and utilizing the reconstructive elevator, function can be restored concomitantly with form and aesthetic appearance. General concepts for soft-tissue reconstruction after burn contracture are presented for different sub-units and joints.

Epinephrine one-per-mil tumescent solution in hand surgery: Review of experimental and clinical studies

One-per-mil epinephrine solution (1:1,000,000) injected as a tumescent has been used in several hand and upper-limb surgery cases as a substitute for tourniquet. However, reviews of its effectiveness are still lacking. A comprehensive review was conducted based on PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Semantic Scholar database search of relevant studies using the keyword "one-per-mil." Studies not using the exact one-per-mil tumescent solution formula were excluded. The review of clinical studies was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Epinephrine and the hydrostatic vasocompressive effect created bloodless operative fields, with 100% experimental flap survival after ischemic insult. The technique was effective in creating bloodless operative fields in 36.3% of varied hand and upper-limb surgery cases and in fully awake surgery. Current studies show that one-per-mil tumescent solution is safe and effective, enabling use of tourniquet to be avoided.