Distinguishing atrophy and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia from prostatic adenocarcinoma with and without previous adjuvant hormone therapy with the aid of cytokeratin 5/6

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Is a Biomarker for Residual Disease following Neoadjuvant Intense Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant intense androgen deprivation therapy (iADT) can exert a wide range of histological responses, which in turn are reflected in the final prostatectomy specimen. Accurate identification and measurement of residual tumor volumes are critical for tracking and stratifying patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The goal of this current study was to evaluate the ability of antibodies against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) to specifically detect residual tumor in a cohort of 35 patients treated with iADT plus enzalutamide for 6 months prior to radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS

Residual carcinoma was detected in 31 patients, and PSMA reacted positively with tumor in all cases. PSMA staining was 96% sensitive for tumor, with approximately 82% of benign regions showing no reactivity. By contrast, PSMA positively reacted with 72% of benign regions in a control cohort of 37 untreated cases, resulting in 28% specificity for tumor. PSMA further identified highly dedifferentiated prostate carcinomas including tumors with evidence of neuroendocrine differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose that anti-PSMA immunostaining be a standardized marker for identifying residual cancer in the setting of iADT.

Diagnostic Utility of Cytokeratin-5 for the Identification of Proliferative Inflammatory Atrophy in the Canine Prostate

Proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA), which is comprised of highly proliferative but atrophic prostate epithelial cells in association with chronic inflammation, is considered a risk lesion for prostate cancer in men, while its role in canine prostate carcinogenesis is still unknown. We evaluated the value of immunohistochemical labelling for the basal cell marker cytokeratin-5 (CK5) in identifying PIA lesions in 87 samples of formalin-fixed and paraffin wax-embedded canine prostate. Canine PIA showed cytological features identical to the human counterpart and in most cases was associated with chronic lymphoplasmacytic inflammation. PIA lesions were identified in a higher number of CK5-labelled slides (43 out of 87) compared with slides stained by haematoxylin and eosin (HE) (24 out of 87). This lesion was frequently present in normal, hyperplastic and neoplastic canine prostates, although it was underestimated on evaluation of HE-stained slides. Therefore, CK5 can be considered a useful basal cell marker with high sensitivity and specificity for PIA.

The Application of Immunohistochemical Biomarkers in Urologic Surgical Pathology

Context

Tumors of the genitourinary tract can be diagnostically challenging, particularly in core biopsies and cystoscopic biopsies with limited material. Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool to use when morphology alone is insufficient for diagnosis.

Objectives

To review tumors and benign lesions of the kidney, urinary bladder, prostate gland, testis, and paratesticular structures with an emphasis on difficult differential diagnoses, as well as staining patterns in normal tissue. Recommended immunohistochemical stain panels are discussed that can assist in the diagnostic workup.

Data Sources

Review of current literature.

Conclusions

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool, assisting in the diagnosis of problematic tumors and benign lesions of the genitourinary tract.

Reliability of the 34βE12, keratin 5/6, p63, bcl-2, and AMACR in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to investigate which basal cell marker should be used with α-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) to increase diagnostic accuracy in the diagnosis of prostate carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 98 cases of prostate biopsy, comprising 65 cases with prostate adenocarcinoma and 33 cases without adenocarcinoma, were included in this study. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum levels before biopsies were obtained. The number of cores with malignant glands and Gleason scores for each case were determined. Paraffin sections were stained immunohistochemically with 34βE12, keratin 5/6, p63, bcl-2, and AMACR.

RESULTS

According to staining pattern, extensiveness, and intensity of basal cell markers in benign glands, 34βE12 gave the best results. As negative markers for prostate adenocarcinoma, the best markers were p63 and 34βE12. According to the AUC values in ROC curves for both extensiveness and intensity, the arrangement from the best to the worst was 34βE12, p63, bcl-2, and keratin 5/6. The 34βE12 had the best sensitivity and specificity values (95% and 98%, respectively). Staining extensiveness and intensity of keratin 5/6 in malignant glands, and those of bcl-2 in benign glands had statistically significant positive correlation with serum PSA levels. Even though AMACR is a negative marker for benignity, some of the benign glands also had positive immune reaction with AMACR. However, AMACR positivity was usually focal and weak. Nevertheless, intensively stained subjects were also present. No correlation was present between AMACR and basal cell markers.

CONCLUSIONS

As a result, we suggest that keratin 5/6 and bcl-2 should not be used to identify benign glands in prostate biopsy since they show high positivity in malignant glands and high negativity in benign glands. 34βE12 should be the first choice as a basal cell marker. p63 can be used together with 34βE12, but it may not give additional diagnostic information. When we evaluated the correlation of basal cell markers, we did not find any complementary staining results among basal cell markers. Our study showed that 34βE12 is the most appropriate negative marker to combine with AMACR as a positive marker for the diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma.

Usefulness of cytokeratin 5/6 and AMACR applied as double sequential immunostains for diagnostic assessment of problematic prostate specimens

We evaluated the usefulness of double immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin (CK)5/6 and alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) applied sequentially on 1 slide by assessing 223 foci in 110 consecutive prostate specimens. Double-chromogen reaction was used to visualize the antibodies: brown for CK5/6 and red for AMACR. Staining was scored as diffuse, focal, or negative. To establish the diagnosis, CK5/6 and AMACR were correlated with the morphologic features. All cancers lacked CK5/6 staining (100% specificity). AMACR showed diffuse or focal positivity in cancer, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and atypia in 96.8% (120/124), 85% (22/26), and 80% (16/20) of cases, respectively. In atypical cases, diagnosis was because of non-immunohistochemical staining reasons in 80% of cases. In adenosis (n = 14), AMACR was diffusely positive in 4 cases (29%). Double immunohistochemical staining for CK5/6 and AMACR is a simple assay to perform and may be used as an alternative to antibody cocktails for routine evaluation of problematic prostate specimens.

Inhibition of vimentin or beta1 integrin reverts morphology of prostate tumor cells grown in laminin-rich extracellular matrix gels and reduces tumor growth in vivo

Prostate epithelial cells grown embedded in laminin-rich extracellular matrix (lrECM) undergo morphologic changes that closely resemble their architecture in vivo. In this study, growth characteristics of three human prostate epithelial sublines derived from the same cellular lineage, but displaying different tumorigenic and metastatic properties in vivo, were assessed in three-dimensional lrECM gels. M12, a highly tumorigenic and metastatic subline, was derived from the immortalized, prostate epithelial P69 cell line by selection in athymic, nude mice and found to contain a deletion of 19p-q13.1. The stable reintroduction of an intact human chromosome 19 into M12 resulted in a poorly tumorigenic subline, designated F6. When embedded in lrECM gels, the parental, nontumorigenic P69 line produced acini with clearly defined lumena. Immunostaining with antibodies to beta-catenin, E-cadherin, or alpha6 and beta1 integrins showed polarization typical of glandular epithelium. In contrast, the metastatic M12 subline produced highly disorganized cells with no evidence of polarization. The F6 subline reverted to acini-like structures exhibiting basal polarity marked with integrins. Reducing either vimentin levels via small interfering RNA interference or the expression of alpha6 and beta1integrins by the addition of blocking antibodies, reorganized the M12 subline into forming polarized acini. The loss of vimentin significantly reduced M12-Vim tumor growth when assessed by s.c. injection in athymic mice. Thus, tumorigenicity in vivo correlated with disorganized growth in three-dimensional lrECM gels. These studies suggest that the levels of vimentin and beta1 integrin play a key role in the homeostasis of the normal acinus in prostate and that their dysregulation may lead to tumorigenesis.

[Histological modifications observed in prostate after preserving treatments for prostate cancer and their impact on Gleason score interpretation]

Total prostatectomy remains the main treatment for intermediate risk prostate cancer with a life expectancy greater than 10 years. In other cases non-surgical treatments can be proposed: external radiotherapy (exclusive or combined anti-androgen therapy), brachytherapy with permanent implants, high frequency ultrasounds (HIFU, Ablatherm), cryotherapy or exclusive hormonal treatment. For such patients in case of biological recurrence, prostate biopsies are usually performed in order to affirm the local recurrence. The histological confirmation of persistent tumor is usually required before any treatment: salvage surgery, cryotherapy, and brachytherapy or high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Pathologists must be aware of the histological modifications induced by these different treatments in order to ensure an optimal interpretation of the biopsies. In this review, we describe the modifications observed in the normal prostate and in cancers after these various therapeutic methods, and also after alpha reductase inhibitors proposed as treatment of benign prostate hypertrophy and prostate cancer chemoprevention.

The human keratins: biology and pathology

The keratins are the typical intermediate filament proteins of epithelia, showing an outstanding degree of molecular diversity. Heteropolymeric filaments are formed by pairing of type I and type II molecules. In humans 54 functional keratin genes exist. They are expressed in highly specific patterns related to the epithelial type and stage of cellular differentiation. About half of all keratins—including numerous keratins characterized only recently—are restricted to the various compartments of hair follicles. As part of the epithelial cytoskeleton, keratins are important for the mechanical stability and integrity of epithelial cells and tissues. Moreover, some keratins also have regulatory functions and are involved in intracellular signaling pathways, e.g. protection from stress, wound healing, and apoptosis. Applying the new consensus nomenclature, this article summarizes, for all human keratins, their cell type and tissue distribution and their functional significance in relation to transgenic mouse models and human hereditary keratin diseases. Furthermore, since keratins also exhibit characteristic expression patterns in human tumors, several of them (notably K5, K7, K8/K18, K19, and K20) have great importance in immunohistochemical tumor diagnosis of carcinomas, in particular of unclear metastases and in precise classification and subtyping. Future research might open further fields of clinical application for this remarkable protein family.

Differential expression of TGFbeta-stimulated clone 22 in normal prostate and prostate cancer

The transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta) superfamily and its downstream effector genes are key regulators of epithelial homeostasis. Altered expression of these genes may be associated with malignant transformation of the prostate gland. The cDNA array analysis of differential expression of the TGFbeta superfamily and functionally related genes between patient-matched noncancerous prostate (NP) and prostate cancer (PC) bulk tissue specimens highlighted two genes, namely TGFbeta-stimulated clone-22 (TSC-22) and Id4. Verification of their mRNA expression by real-time PCR in patient-matched NP and PC bulk tissue, in laser-captured pure epithelial and cancer cells and in NP and PC cell lines confirmed TSC-22 underexpression, but not Id4 overexpression, in PC and in human PC cell lines. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that TSC-22 protein expression in NP is restricted to the basal cells and colocalizes with the basal cell marker cytokeratin 5. In contrast, all matched PC samples lack TSC-22 immunoreactivity. Likewise, PC cell lines do not show detectable TSC-22 protein expression as shown by immunoblotting. TSC-22 should be considered as a novel basal cell marker, potentially useful for studying lineage determination within the epithelial compartment of the prostate. Conversely, lack of TSC-22 seems to be a hallmark of malignant transformation of the prostate epithelium. Accordingly, TSC-22 immunohistochemistry may prove to be a diagnostic tool for discriminating benign lesions from malignant ones of the prostate. The suggested tumour suppressor function of TSC-22 warrants further investigation on its role in prostate carcinogenesis and on the TSC-22 pathway as a candidate therapeutic target in PC.

Immunohistochemistry in diagnostic surgical pathology of the prostate

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can play an important role in diagnostic surgical pathology of the prostate. Basal cell markers, such as the 34betaE12 antibody and antibodies directed against cytokeratin 5 and 6 or p63, are very useful for demonstration of basal cells as their presence argues against a diagnosis of invasive prostatic carcinoma (PC). However, several benign mimickers of PC, including atrophy, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), nephrogenic adenoma, and mesonephric hyperplasia, can stain negatively with these markers, and thus, a negative basal cell marker immunostain alone does not exclude a diagnosis of benignancy. Although there are examples in the literature of high grade PC that stain focally with some of the basal cell markers, these cases are usually readily diagnosed based on H&E appearances and are unlikely to be confused with these benign mimickers. Alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) is a sensitive marker of PC (except for a few uncommon variants: atrophic, foamy gland, and pseudohyperplastic variants), and its detection by immunohistochemical staining in atypical prostatic lesions can be very useful in confirming an impression of adenocarcinoma. AMACR expression can also be identified in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), prostatic atrophy, AAH, and benign prostatic glands, and accordingly, a diagnosis of PC should not be based solely on a positive AMACR immunostain, especially when the luminal staining is weak and/or noncircumferential. The use of AMACR/basal cell antibody cocktails has been found to greatly facilitate the distinction between PC and its benign mimickers, especially when only limited tissue is available for staining. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) are both quite sensitive and fairly specific markers of PC (there are a few nonprostatic tumors that can express one or both), and are both very helpful in establishing or confirming the diagnosis of PC when the differential diagnosis includes other tumors that can involve the prostate such as urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma. 34betaE12, p63, thrombomodulin, and uroplakin III are additional urothelial associated markers useful in this differential diagnosis. CDX2 and villin are useful markers to diagnostically separate colonic adenocarcinoma from PC. AMACR positivity and negative basal cell marker reactions are useful to confirm the presence of residual PC after hormonal or radiation therapy. Pan-cytokeratin, PSA, and PSAP can also highlight subtle infiltrates of PC with hormonal or radiation therapy effect. PSA and PSAP immunohistochemical stains are valuable in confirming metastatic carcinoma as being of prostatic origin and should always be utilized in the diagnostic evaluation of metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary origin in males.

Microvessel density as a molecular marker for identifying high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia precursors to prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Existing clinical data have shown that high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is the most likely precursor to prostate cancer (CaP). Criteria to distinguish HGPIN that progress to CaP from those that do not remain poorly defined. Our objective was to evaluate microvessel density as a molecular marker for distinguishing HGPINs that have the potential of progressing to cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human prostatic tissue samples were collected randomly from 50 prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy patients. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sections were used for immunohistochemical localization of rabbit anti-human von Willebrand factor VIII (vWF) IgG, mouse anti-high molecular weight cytokeratin 34BE-12 in basal cells, and mouse anti-heparan sulphate proteoglycan (HSPG) IgGs in basement membranes associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), PIN associated with some BPH (isolated PIN), and PIN associated with CaP.

RESULTS

Analysis of immunostaining data showed that PINs could be categorized according to their distributions within and outside 2 standard deviations (SD) of the mean for microvessel density. The average number of microvessels was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in PINs associated with Gleason score 7 tumors than those associated with Gleason scores 4-6 (P < 0.1328) or 8 and 9 tumors (P < 0.1708). Morphologically, PINs within 2 SD were composed of low- and high-grade type, whereas those outside 2 SD of microvessel density were predominantly of high-grade type. Cytokeratin and HSPG localization patterns also showed differences in PINs found within and outside 2 SD of microvessel density. We found localization of cytokeratin 34BE-12 in basal cells of specimens with BPH alone, isolated PIN, and PIN associated with CaP within 2 SD, whereas many PINs outside 2 SD showed disruptions in cytokeratin localization. The basement membranes of PINs within 2 SD of microvessel density were relatively intact, whereas those outside 2 SD were fragmented.

CONCLUSIONS

Our immunostaining data indicates that once HGPIN is found in the initial prostatic biopsy, it should be evaluated for microvessel density by localization of vWF. Our data indicate that characteristics of HGPIN can be augmented by evaluations of cytokeratin and HSPG molecular markers to assess the potential of HGPIN progression to malignancy. When biopsy samples show HGPIN with increased microvessel density and disrupted cytokeratin and HSPG markers, the patient may be a candidate for repeat biopsy. Since our study is limited to 50 prostate tissue samples, we emphasize that our conclusion is tentative and ought to be confirmed in a study with a larger sample size. This is the first report to show that microvessel density may distinguish HGPIN that is a precursor to prostate cancer.