WT1 is an integral component of an antibody panel to distinguish pancreaticobiliary and some ovarian epithelial neoplasms

An Update on the Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Evaluation of Pancreatic/Liver/Gastrointestinal Luminal Tract Disorders

CONTEXT.—

Immunohistochemistry serves as an ancillary diagnostic tool for a wide variety of neoplastic and nonneoplastic disorders, including infections, workup of inflammatory conditions, and subtyping neoplasms of the pancreas/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract. In addition, immunohistochemistry is also used to detect a variety of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

OBJECTIVE.—

To highlight an update on the role of immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of pancreatic/liver/gastrointestinal luminal tract disorders.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool, assisting in the diagnosis of problematic tumors and benign lesions of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract, and also in the prediction of prognosis and therapeutic response for carcinomas of the pancreas, liver, and gastrointestinal luminal tract.

Phase I Study of a Multivalent WT1 Peptide Vaccine (Galinpepimut-S) in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with WT1-Expressing Ovarian Cancer in Second or Third Remission

We examined the safety and immunogenicity of sequential administration of a tetravalent, non-HLA (human leukocyte antigen) restricted, heteroclitic Wilms' Tumor 1 (WT1) peptide vaccine (galinpepimut-S) with anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1) nivolumab. This open-label, non-randomized phase I study enrolled patients with WT1-expressing ovarian cancer in second or third remission from June 2016 to July 2017. Therapy included six (every two weeks) subcutaneous inoculations of galinpepimut-S vaccine adjuvanted with Montanide, low-dose subcutaneous sargramostim at the injection site, with intravenous nivolumab over 12 weeks, and up to six additional doses until disease progression or toxicity. One-year progression-free survival (PFS) was correlated to T-cell responses and WT1-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G levels. Eleven patients were enrolled; seven experienced a grade 1 adverse event, and one experienced a grade ≥3 adverse event considered a dose-limiting toxicity. Ten (91%) of eleven patients had T-cell responses to WT1 peptides. Seven (88%) of eight evaluable patients had IgG against WT1 antigen and full-length protein. In evaluable patients who received >2 treatments of galinpepimut-S and nivolumab, the 1-year PFS rate was 70%. Coadministration of galinpepimut-S and nivolumab demonstrated a tolerable toxicity profile and induced immune responses, as indicated by immunophenotyping and WT1-specific IgG production. Exploratory analysis for efficacy yielded a promising 1-year PFS rate.

The cytokeratin 17 expression in primary ovarian tumors has diagnostic but not prognostic significance

We assessed the value of cytokeratin 17 (CK17) expression for the differential diagnosis between primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastases from the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and the significance of CK17 expression in a broad spectrum of primary ovarian tumors with respect to their prognosis. The sample set consisted of 554 primary ovarian tumors and 255 GIT tumors. In the primary ovarian tumors, a higher CK17 expression (in > 10% of tumors cells) was present only in 0-11.4% of all tumors (including mucinous tumors, micropapillary serous borderline tumors, clear cell, endometrioid, and high-grade serous carcinomas). The only exception was low-grade serous carcinoma, where higher CK17 expression was present in 24% of cases. Concerning GIT tumors, the higher levels of CK 17 expression (in > 10% of tumor cells) were observed in the upper GIT tumors (68.5% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, 61.6% of gallbladder adenocarcinoma, and 46% of gastric adenocarcinoma), which differs substantially not only from most of the primary ovarian tumors, but also from colorectal carcinoma (3.7%; p < 0.001). The results of our study suggest that expression of CK17 can potentially be used as an adjunct marker in differential diagnosis between primary ovarian mucinous tumors and metastases from the upper GIT, but not from colorectal carcinoma. However, in GIT tumors, CK17 can be used in the differential diagnosis between adenocarcinomas of the upper and lower GIT. Statistical analysis did not reveal strong association of CK17 expression with clinicopathological variables or patient outcomes in any primary ovarian tumors.

Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast Metastatic to the Ovary: A Clinicopathologic Study of 38 Cases

We evaluated the clinicopathologic features of 38 cases of metastatic lobular (n=33) or predominantly lobular (n=5) carcinoma involving the ovary. The patients were from 39 to 91 years of age (mean: 53 y). In 2 cases, the breast primary and ovarian metastasis were diagnosed synchronously, and in 5, the breast primary was only discovered after the metastatic carcinoma in the ovary was found. In the majority of cases (79%), both ovaries were involved; the mean ovarian tumor size was 5.9 cm. The ovarian tumors demonstrated a range of architectural patterns including macronodular (71%), diffuse/solid growth (87%), single-cell infiltration (87%), cords (74%), and small nests/clusters (50%). Nine cases demonstrated focal signet ring cell morphology. The associated stromal reaction ranged from none to marked, with almost half of cases demonstrating a marked stromal response, largely prominent sclerosis. A variety of neoplasms, most typically sex cord-stromal tumors, lymphoma/leukemia, and desmoplastic small round cell tumor, may enter the differential. In addition to the obvious help afforded in most cases by the clinical history, a combination of judicious sampling, particularly to unearth the delicate cords or single-cell growth of lobular carcinoma, appropriate consideration of the cytologic features of the neoplastic cells, and immunohistochemistry can resolve the diverse issues in differential diagnosis that may arise.

Ovarian metastases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: clinical presentation, role of surgery, and potential value of the mutational profile for the differential diagnosis with primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma

Background:

Ovarian metastases (OM) of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) (OM-PA) can mimic primary ovarian mucinous carcinoma (POMC) on imaging and histology. These metastases are often symptomatic and not highly chemosensitive, so that oophorectomy may be considered.

Aims:

The aims of this study were to compare the characteristics of OM-PA and POMC, and discuss the role of surgery.

Patients and Methods:

Clinical, imaging, and histological data of patients with OM-PA and POMC (2000–2017) in three tertiary centers were reviewed. Twenty-six genes were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS) on both primary PA and OM-PA.

Results:

Twenty-two women with OM-PA (n = 13, 11 with surgical resection) or POMC (n = 9) were selected. OM-PA were smaller than POMC (p = 0.02); imaging, histological, and immunohistochemistry data did not clearly differentiate OM-PA from POMC in 12 of 22 cases (54%). Seven PA/OM-PA pairs were analyzed, and a concordant KRAS mutation was identified in all cases. In four OM-PA, concordant mutations were also found in TP53 (n = 3), SMAD4 (n = 1), MET (n = 1), and PDGFRA (n = 1) genes. The aim of oophorectomy in 11 OM-PA was for antalgic (n = 6) or curative (n = 5) intent. Pain improved in 4/6 of the former patients, but 2/6 had significant morbidity, and 2/6 died of rapid tumor progression. After oophorectomy, median progression-free and overall survivals were 6 (0–11) and 8 months (1–131), respectively.

Conclusion:

Analysis of mutation profiles in both primary PA and ovarian tumors, especially KRAS, can help to determine the pancreatic origin of OM-PA. Surgical resection of OM-AP in highly selected patients may improve pelvic symptoms but may also cause significant morbidity. The benefit to survival requires further studies.

Primary mucinous ovarian tumors vs. ovarian metastases from gastrointestinal tract, pancreas and biliary tree: a review of current problematics

Background

Making the distinction between primary mucinous and metastatic ovarian tumors is often difficult, especially in tumors with a primary source from the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas and biliary tree. The aim of the following paper is to provide an overview of the problematics, with a focus on the possibilities of the differential diagnosis at the macroscopic, microscopic and immunohistochemical level.

Main body

The three main aspects of mucinous ovarian tumors are described in detail, including the comparison of the available diagnostic algorithms based on the evaluation of mostly macroscopic features, characterization of the spectrum of microscopic features, and a detailed analysis of the immunophenotype comparing 20 antibodies with the assessment of their statistical significance for differential diagnosis purposes. Specific features, including Krukenberg tumor and pseudomyxoma peritonei, are also discussed.

Conclusion

Despite the growing knowledge of the macroscopic and microscopic features of ovarian mucinous tumors and the availability of a wide range of immunohistochemical antibodies useful in this setting, there still remains a group of tumors which cannot be precisely classified without close clinical-pathological cooperation.

Pancreatic cancer with ovarian metastases: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer with ovarian metastases is rare and easily misdiagnosed. Most patients are first diagnosed with ovarian cancer. We report a rare case of ovarian metastases secondary to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We also review the literature to analyze the clinical characteristics of, diagnostic methods for, and perioperative management strategies for this rare malignancy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 48-year-old woman with an abdominal mass presented to our hospital. Computed tomography revealed lesions in the pancreas and lower abdomen. Radiological examination and histological investigation of biopsy specimens revealed either an ovarian metastasis from a pancreatic neoplasm or two primary tumors, with metastasis strongly suspected. The patient simultaneously underwent distal pancreatectomy plus splenectomy by a general surgeon and salpingo-oophorectomy with hysterectomy by a gynecologist. Histological examination of the surgical specimen revealed a pancreatic adenocarcinoma (intermediate differentiation, mucinous) and a metastatic mucinous adenocarci-noma in the ovary.

CONCLUSION

For this rare tumor, surgical resection is the most effective treatment, and the final diagnosis depends on tumor pathology.

Ovarian cancer and the evolution of subtype classifications using transcriptional profiling†

Ovarian cancer is a complex disease with multiple subtypes, each having distinct histopathologies and variable responses to treatment. This review highlights the technological milestones and the studies that have applied them to change our definitions of ovarian cancer. Over the past 50 years, technologies such as microarrays and next-generation sequencing have led to the discovery of molecular alterations that define each of the ovarian cancer subtypes and has enabled further subclassification of the most common subtype, high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Improvements in mutational profiling have provided valuable insight, such as the ubiquity of TP53 mutations in HGSOC tumors. However, the information derived from these technological advances has also revealed the immense heterogeneity of this disease, from variation between patients to compositional differences within single masses. In looking forward, the emerging technologies for single-cell and spatially resolved transcriptomics will allow us to better understand the cellular composition and structure of tumors and how these contribute to the molecular subtypes. Attempts to incorporate the complexities ovarian cancer has resulted in increasing sophistication of model systems, and the increased precision in molecular profiling of ovarian cancers has already led to the introduction of inhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases as a new class of treatments for ovarian cancer with DNA repair deficiencies. Future endeavors to define increasingly accurate classification strategies for ovarian cancer subtypes will allow for confident prediction of disease progression and provide important insight into potentially targetable molecular mechanisms specific to each subtype.

Immunohistochemical Expression of Wilms’ Tumor 1 Protein in Human Tissues: From Ontogenesis to Neoplastic Tissues

The human Wilms’ tumor gene (WT1) was originally isolated in a Wilms’ tumor of the kidney as a tumor suppressor gene. Numerous isoforms of WT1, by combination of alternative translational start sites, alternative RNA splicing and RNA editing, have been well documented. During human ontogenesis, according to the antibodies used, anti-C or N-terminus WT1 protein, nuclear expression can be frequently obtained in numerous tissues, including metanephric and mesonephric glomeruli, and mesothelial and sub-mesothelial cells, while cytoplasmic staining is usually found in developing smooth and skeletal cells, myocardium, glial cells, neuroblasts, adrenal cortical cells and the endothelial cells of blood vessels. WT1 has been originally described as a tumor suppressor gene in renal Wilms’ tumor, but more recent studies emphasized its potential oncogenic role in several neoplasia with a variable immunostaining pattern that can be exclusively nuclear, cytoplasmic or both, according to the antibodies used (anti-C or N-terminus WT1 protein). With the present review we focus on the immunohistochemical expression of WT1 in some tumors, emphasizing its potential diagnostic role and usefulness in differential diagnosis. In addition, we analyze the WT1 protein expression profile in human embryonal/fetal tissues in order to suggest a possible role in the development of organs and tissues and to establish whether expression in some tumors replicates that observed during the development of tissues from which these tumors arise.

Pancreaticobiliary metastasis presenting as primary mucinous ovarian neoplasm: A systematic literature review

True primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas are rarer than originally thought and their clinical behavior and treatment response are different than more common epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Secondary ovarian neoplasms often mimic the clinical and histological features of mucinous ovarian cancer making their diagnosis, and therefore treatment, more difficult. Misdiagnosis can have a significant impact on both treatment and prognosis. The majority of these secondary ovarian neoplasms arise from the gastrointestinal tract, with mucinous histology often of pancreaticobiliary origin. Our study objective was to review current evidence distinguishing pancreaticobiliary ovarian metastasis from primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma. We utilized a PubMed search using MeSH terms and selected articles were reviewed, synthesized and summarized. Thirty-nine articles were included in the review. The clinical, gross, histological and immunohistochemical features distinguishing primary mucinous ovarian carcinomas from pancreaticobiliary ovarian metastasis were identified. Compared to primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma, metastatic pancreaticobiliary tumors are more often bilateral, <10 cm, have irregular external surface and surface implants, display an infiltrative pattern of invasion and stain for MUC1 and CK17. Primary ovarian mucinous tumors rarely (<3%) have signet ring cells or involvement of the hilum. Metastatic mucinous tumors mimic their primary mucinous ovarian counterparts and their clinical and histopathological features overlap in many ways. However, these metastatic tumors have features that can help differentiate them from primary mucinous carcinoma. With a high index of suspicion and knowledge of the reviewed features, distinguishing these tumors will continue to become easier.

•

Primary ovarian and metastatic pancreaticobiliary tumors present similarly.

•

Histologic findings can differentiate primary from metastatic ovarian tumors.

•

Bilaterality, size, surface appearance can differentiate primary versus metastatic.

WT1, p53 and p16 expression in the diagnosis of low- and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas and their relation to prognosis

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of the immunohistochemical expression of WT1, p53 and p16 in low- (LGSOCs) and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs).

Results

HGSOC had a significantly higher proportion of advanced stage disease, higher CA125 levels, higher proportion of post-surgery residual disease and higher recurrence or disease progression. WT1 was expressed in 71.4% of LGSOCs and in 57.1% of HGSOCs (p = 0.32). Focal and/or complete absence of p53 expression with negative p16 expression was found in 90.5% of LGSOCs, in contrast to the 88.1% of HGSOCs with diffuse or complete absence of p53 expression with positive p16 expression (<0.001). The IHC p53/p16 index and the morphological classification were closely matched (k = 0.68). In the univariate analysis, FIGO stage, post-surgery residual disease and histological grade were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The IHC p53/p16 index was associated only with PFS. WT1 was not associated with PFS or OS. According to the multivariate analysis, advanced FIGO stage and presence of post-surgery residual disease remained independent prognostic factors for worst PFS, however these features had only a trend association with OS.

Methods

21 LGSOC and 85 HGSOC stage I-IV cases were included. The morphological classification was assessed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in tissue microarray slides. IHC p53/p16 index was compared with the morphological classification.

Conclusions

The IHC p53/p16 index was a good marker for the differentiation of LGSOC and HGSOC, but the morphologic classification showed a better association with survival. FIGO stage and post-surgery residual disease remained the only independent prognostic factors for survival.

WT1, p53 and p16 expression in the diagnosis of low- and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas and their relation to prognosis

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of the immunohistochemical expression of WT1, p53 and p16 in low- (LGSOCs) and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs).

Results

HGSOC had a significantly higher proportion of advanced stage disease, higher CA125 levels, higher proportion of post-surgery residual disease and higher recurrence or disease progression. WT1 was expressed in 71.4% of LGSOCs and in 57.1% of HGSOCs (p = 0.32). Focal and/or complete absence of p53 expression with negative p16 expression was found in 90.5% of LGSOCs, in contrast to the 88.1% of HGSOCs with diffuse or complete absence of p53 expression with positive p16 expression (<0.001). The IHC p53/p16 index and the morphological classification were closely matched (k = 0.68). In the univariate analysis, FIGO stage, post-surgery residual disease and histological grade were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The IHC p53/p16 index was associated only with PFS. WT1 was not associated with PFS or OS. According to the multivariate analysis, advanced FIGO stage and presence of post-surgery residual disease remained independent prognostic factors for worst PFS, however these features had only a trend association with OS.

Methods

21 LGSOC and 85 HGSOC stage I–IV cases were included. The morphological classification was assessed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in tissue microarray slides. IHC p53/p16 index was compared with the morphological classification.

Conclusions

The IHC p53/p16 index was a good marker for the differentiation of LGSOC and HGSOC, but the morphologic classification showed a better association with survival. FIGO stage and post-surgery residual disease remained the only independent prognostic factors for survival.

Metastasis of ovarian cancer to the breast: A report of two cases and a review of the literature

Metastasis of ovarian cancer to the breast (MOCB) is a rare event. Clinical presentations of MOCB vary and surgery is the mainstay of treatment. The current study presents two cases of MOCB in women with recurrent ovarian cancer first diagnosed in April 2011 and October 2013, respectively. The patients presented to the clinic with a localized, palpable, painful mass in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast and a centrally localized, palpable, painful mass of the left breast, respectively. Breast sonography and mammography showed a singular, round, homogenous tumor with irregular borders in each case. An ipsilateral enlarged axillary node was palpable in one case. Tumor biopsy revealed an undifferentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown origin in one case and a moderately-differentiated adenocarcinoma suspected to be breast cancer in the other case. Tumor cells were positive for estrogen receptor and paired box 8, and negative for GATA binding protein 3 in the two cases. Palliative mastectomy was performed in one case and lumpectomy with ipsilateral axillary sentinel node biopsy in the other case, and the final histology revealed MOCB in each. The post-operative course of the disease was uneventful and the patients continued with their ovarian cancer-specific chemotherapy. One patient succumbed to disease progression 2 months after breast surgery. The other patient remains alive and is currently undergoing systemic chemotherapy. The current study also presents a review of 110 cases of MOCB identified in a literature search of Pubmed. Data from these studies, including the clinical and histological characteristics of MOCB, and the clinical management and prognosis are discussed. Overall, MOCB is rare, with distinct clinical and histological features. The disease is usually treated with local surgical excision or mastectomy and has a poor prognosis.

Practical Applications in Immunohistochemistry: Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site

CONTEXT

-Identification of the site of origin of carcinoma of unknown primary using immunohistochemistry is a frequent requirement of anatomic pathologists. Diagnostic accuracy is crucial, particularly in the current era of targeted therapies and smaller sample sizes.

OBJECTIVES

-To provide practical guidance and suggestions for classifying carcinoma of unknown primary using both proven and new antibodies, as well as targeting panels based on integration of morphologic and clinical features.

DATA SOURCES

-Literature review, the authors' practice experience, and authors' research.

CONCLUSIONS

-With well-performed and interpreted immunohistochemistry panels, anatomic pathologists can successfully identify the site of origin of carcinoma of unknown primary. It is crucial to understand not only the diagnostic uses of the many available antibodies but also the potential limits and pitfalls.

Reliability of PAX8 in clinical practice to accurately determine primary site of origin in female pelvic or abdominal lesions

Female patients with gynecological malignancies can harbor peritoneal pelvic or abdominal lesions; however, other primary tumors can involve the peritoneum as well. Since sampling of the peritoneum now can be easily performed by fine needle aspiration or percutaneous biopsy, we have noticed an increase in such procedures as initial attempts to establish a diagnosis. PAX8 has been used alone or in combination with other tumor markers to accurately classify these lesions and determine primary site of origin; however, prior published studies determined expression of PAX8 within historically diagnosed cases. We reviewed the reliability of PAX8 to determine tumor type or primary site in 135 current clinical pelvic or abdominal lesions and highlight several pitfalls in its routine use, in particular, relying on the presumed expression pattern (positive or negative) within a given primary tumor and that poorly differentiated endometrial endometrioid carcinomas or undifferentiated carcinomas may have patchy PAX8 expression or even lose expression within the primary tumor or the metastasis.

Wilms' tumor gene 1 immunotherapy in pelvic gynecological malignancies

Pelvic gynecological malignancies account for 6% of all cancers. In the relapsed state, classical treatments are limited. There is an urgent need for new and personalized treatment. Wilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1) is the most important tumor-associated antigen. Although highly present in gynecological tumors, active immunotherapy against it is still underexplored. This review gives an insight into the importance of WT1 in pelvic gynecological malignancies and the first taken steps into the world of WT1 immunotherapy.

Prognostic significance of specific anti-WT1 IgG antibody level in plasma in patients with ovarian carcinoma

Ovarian carcinoma (OC) has a poor prognosis and lack early effective screening markers. Wilm's tumor gene 1 (WT1) is overexpressed in OCs. Therefore, it is of great interest to investigate whether WT1-specific antibody (Ab) measurements in plasma can serve as a biomarker of anti-OC response, and is of importance in relation to patient prognosis. Peripheral blood samples were obtained from a total of 103 women with ovarian tumors with median being 1 day (range 0–48 days) before operation. WT1 IgG Ab levels were evaluated using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Immunohistochemical analysis of WT1 protein expression was performed on OC tissue samples. We found that low-WT1 Ab level in plasma was related to improved survival in patients diagnosed at stages III–IV and grade 3 carcinomas. Positive WT1 protein staining on OC tissue samples had a negative impact on survival in the entire cohort, both overall survival (OS) (P = 0.046) and progression-free survival (PFS) (P = 0.006), but not in the serous OC subtype. Combining WT1 IgG Ab levels and WT1 staining, patients with high-WT1 IgG Ab levels in plasma and positive WT1 protein staining in cancer tissues had shorter survival, with a significant association in PFS (P = 0.016). These results indicated that WT1 Ab measurements in plasma and WT1 staining in tissue specimens could be useful as biomarkers for patient outcome in the high-risk subtypes of OCs for postoperative individualized therapy.

Immunohistochemistry: A diagnostic aid in differentiating primary epithelial ovarian tumors and tumors metastatic to the ovary

INTRODUCTION

Among cancers of the female genital tract, the incidence of ovarian cancer ranks below only carcinoma of the cervix and the endometrium. Recent years have witnessed significant development in the use of immunohistochemistry in diagnostic ovarian pathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We received 95 specimens and biopsies of primary ovarian neoplasms and neoplasms metastatic to the ovary in a period of 2 years. Of these 30 cases were of the primary surface epithelial neoplasms and seven of metastatic tumors.

DISCUSSION

The most common tumors metastasizing to the ovary originate from the gastrointestinal tract followed by the endometrium. We used a panel of six markers including cytokeratin-7 (CK7), CK20, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), estrogen receptor (ER) and Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) to help classify various surface epithelial tumors as well as to differentiate them from tumors metastatic to the ovary.

CONCLUSION

CK7 is the most helpful marker to differentiate primary ovarian carcinoma from metastatic colorectal carcinoma of the ovary. Nearly, 96% of ovarian adenocarcinomas were positive for CK7 in contrast to metastatic colorectal, which showed only 25% positivity. We also found that CK7, CK20 and CEA are useful markers to differentiate primary serous tumors from primary mucinous tumors; however, these are less helpful in differentiating ovarian mucinous adenocarcinomas from colorectal adenocarcinomas metastasizing to the ovaries. WT1 helps in typing primary surface epithelial tumors of the ovary and is also significant in determining whether a serous carcinoma within the ovary is primary or metastatic.

Genomic analyses across six cancer types identify basal-like breast cancer as a unique molecular entity

To improve our understanding of the biological relationships among different types of cancer, we have characterized variation in gene expression patterns in a set of 1,707 samples representing 6 human cancer types (breast, ovarian, brain, colorectal, lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell lung cancer). In the unified dataset, breast tumors of the Basal-like subtype were found to represent a unique molecular entity as any other cancer type, including the rest of breast tumors, while showing striking similarities with squamous cell lung cancers. Moreover, gene signatures tracking various cancer- and stromal-related biological processes such as proliferation, hypoxia and immune activation were found expressed similarly in different proportions of tumors across the various cancer types. These data suggest that clinical trials focusing on tumors with common profiles and/or biomarker expression rather than their tissue of origin are warranted with a special focus on Basal-like breast cancer and squamous cell lung carcinoma.

Challenging diagnosis of a jejunal adenocarcinoma with ovarian metastasis: report of an unusual case

We report the first documented case of ovarian metastasis from a jejunal primary adenocarcinoma in an Australian patient. The presentation was unusual, initially a suspicious abdominal nodule in the epigastric area, which turned out to be an adenocarcinoma of possible intestinal origin. Gastroscopy and colonoscopy were performed with no suspicious lesion identified. Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound imaging showed a complex pelvic mass suspicious of ovarian cancer. Laparoscopy was performed to exclude possibility of ovarian cancer and small bowel cancer. The ovarian mass showed similar features from the epigastric nodule, again suggestive of intestinal primary. Definitive diagnosis was obtained when the patient represented 2 months later with malignant bowel obstruction requiring palliative resection of the proximal jejunum. This case demonstrates the difficulty in diagnosing ovarian metastasis from a small bowel primary, which has the potential to mimic an ovarian primary tumour clinically, and a large bowel or ovarian primary pathologically.

Application of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma: a review and update

A large number of immunohistochemical markers that can assist in the differential diagnosis of epithelioid mesotheliomas are currently available. Because these markers are expressed differently in the various types of carcinomas that can metastasize to the serosal membranes and can potentially be confused with epithelioid mesothelioma, their selection for inclusion in a diagnostic panel largely depends on the differential diagnosis, as well as on which ones work the best in a given laboratory. Traditionally, the panels used in the differential diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma have consisted of a combination of positive mesothelioma markers and broad-spectrum carcinoma markers. At present, a wide variety of organ-associated carcinoma markers such as thyroid transcription factor-1 and napsin A for the lung, PAX 8 and PAX 2 for the kidney, and Müllerian-derived tumors; gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 and mammaglobin for the breast; and CDX2 for intestinal differentiation are available, which can assist in establishing the site of origin of an adenocarcinoma when included in a diagnostic panel. This article provides updated information on the composition of the panels of markers recommended in the various differential diagnoses.

Metastases to and from the Breast

Breast cancer is a common source of systemic metastatic disease. Distinguishing metastatic breast cancer from other types of malignancies can be diagnostically challenging but is important for correct treatment and prognosis. Nonmammary tumors can also metastasize to the breast, although this is a rare phenomenon. Differentiating a metastasis to the breast from a primary breast cancer can likewise be difficult. Knowledge of the clinical history and careful morphologic evaluation are the cornerstones of diagnosis. A panel of immunohistochemical stains tailored to the differential diagnosis at hand can provide helpful information in ambiguous cases.

Perturbation of Rb, p53, and Brca1 or Brca2 cooperate in inducing metastatic serous epithelial ovarian cancer

The majority of human high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (SEOC) is characterized by frequent mutations in p53 and alterations in the RB and FOXM1 pathways. A subset of human SEOC harbors a combination of germline and somatic mutations as well as epigenetic dysfunction for BRCA1/2. Using Cre-conditional alleles and intrabursal induction by Cre-expressing adenovirus in genetically engineered mice, we analyzed the roles of pathway perturbations in epithelial ovarian cancer initiation and progression. Inactivation of RB-mediated tumor suppression induced surface epithelial proliferation with progression to stage I carcinoma. Additional biallelic inactivation and/or missense p53 mutation in the presence or absence of Brca1/2 caused progression to stage IV disease. As in human SEOC, mice developed peritoneal carcinomatosis, ascites, and distant metastases. Unbiased gene expression and metabolomic profiling confirmed that Rb, p53, and Brca1/2-triple mutant tumors aligned with human SEOC, and not with other intraperitoneal cancers. Together, our findings provide a novel resource for evaluating disease etiology and biomarkers, therapeutic evaluation, and improved imaging strategies in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Value of PAX8 and WT1 Immunostaining in Confirming the Ovarian Origin of Metastatic Carcinoma in Serous Effusion Specimens

We evaluated the detection rates of PAX8 and WT1 immunostaining in 68 (45 as cell blocks, 23 as smears) serous effusion specimens that had a cytologic diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma of ovarian origin. Of the cases, 58 (85%) were positive for PAX8, 56 (82%) were positive for WT1, and 64 (94%) were immunoreactive with either or both markers. Detection rates of PAX8 and WT1 were 85% (44/52) and 92% (48/52), respectively, for metastatic serous carcinoma and 100% (5/5) and 20% (1/5), respectively, for metastatic clear cell carcinoma. Detection rates using cell blocks and smears were 91% and 78%, respectively, with PAX8 and 82% and 83%, respectively, with WT1. We concluded that PAX8 and WT1 had comparable overall detection rates in confirming ovarian origin of malignant effusion. The combination of both markers substantially improved the detection rate. Cell blocks and smears can be used for staining, but a cell block is preferred for PAX8 staining.

WT1 expression in the female genital tract

The Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1) has been reported in normal tissues and many neoplasms of the female genital tract. This review discusses WT1 expression in the female genital tract and its potential utility in the differential diagnosis of neoplasms that occur at this location. WT1 is of value in the differential diagnosis of synchronous serous carcinomas arising in the ovary/fallopian tube/peritoneum and endometrium, as strong WT1 positivity in both tumors points toward an extrauterine origin. In addition, WT1 can be used to distinguish sex cord stromal tumors (WT1 positive) from endometrioid carcinomas (OECs). WT1 expression is not helpful in the differential diagnosis of ovarian serous carcinomas (OSCs) and transitional carcinomas, as both are typically positive and has limited value in the distinction of serous tumors arising in the ovary/fallopian tube/peritoneum from mesotheliomas. WT1 is also not helpful to differentiate small cell carcinoma of hypercalcemic type from juvenile granulosa cell tumor, a common diagnostic problem. Intra-abdominal desmoplastic round cell tumor reacts to WT1 (C-terminal) in contrast to all other tumors discussed which helps to separate this rare tumor from most other small round cell tumors that may involve, primarily or secondarily, the ovary with the exception of small cell carcinoma of hypercalcemic type that typically reacts with the N-terminal of WT1.

Immunohistochemistry in the distinction between primary and metastatic ovarian mucinous neoplasms: Table 1

The distinction between a primary and metastatic mucinous carcinoma within the ovary may be problematic. In most cases, the distinction can be made by careful pathological examination encompassing both the gross and microscopic findings and taking into account the distribution of the disease. However, immunohistochemistry may be of value in certain scenarios. In this review, I discuss the value of markers in the distinction between primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms and metastatic mucinous carcinomas from the colorectum, appendix, pancreas, biliary tract, stomach and cervix, the most common primary sites which give rise to metastatic mucinous carcinoma within the ovary. There is a significant degree of immunophenotypic overlap between primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms and metastatic mucinous carcinomas from the gastrointestinal tract, especially the upper gastrointestinal type; this is because most primary ovarian mucinous carcinomas and borderline tumours are of so-called intestinal or enteric type and exhibit some degree of positivity with enteric markers. Mullerian type primary ovarian mucinous neoplasms also exist and exhibit distinct immunohistochemical differences to the more common intestinal type.

Metastatic Neoplasms Involving the Ovary

In this review, ovarian metastatic carcinomas from various sites, as well as other neoplasms secondarily involving the ovary, are discussed. As well as describing the morphology, the value of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between primary and metastatic neoplasms in the ovary is discussed. While immunohistochemistry has a valuable role to play and is paramount in some cases, the results should be interpreted with caution and with regard to the clinical picture and gross and microscopic pathologic findings.

Pathologic evaluation of unknown primary cancer

The pathologic approach to metastases of unknown primary cancer (UPC) is stepwise and uses the clinical context, morphology, and, where necessary, immunohistochemistry (IHC). This review covers the initial approach to a UPC biopsy; the diagnosis of malignancy and broad tumor typing into carcinoma, melanoma, lymphoma, or sarcoma; and further subtyping of carcinoma into germ cell (broadly included), squamous, neuroendocrine, and solid organ including liver and renal, and adenocarcinomas. Finally, for adenocarcinoma, the prediction of primary tumor site, including lung, pancreas, stomach, colon, ovary, prostate, and breast, is discussed. For each tumor type, the morphologic features are presented alongside established useful IHC markers, with a description of their staining patterns and common diagnostic dilemmas. Optimal tissue handling and IHC interpretation, quality assurance, and limitations also are discussed. The target readership is oncologists, but other clinicians and trainee pathologists also may find the content of use.

Distinguishing breast carcinoma from Müllerian serous carcinoma with mammaglobin and mesothelin

Differentiation of Müllerian serous carcinoma from metastatic breast carcinoma is a challenging and frequent diagnostic dilemma, particularly in the setting of a pelvic mass or peritoneal carcinomatosis. Precise classification is important as it impacts treatment and prognosis. Antibodies exist that assist with this differential but they are often limited by low sensitivity or specificity. This study evaluated the utility of mesothelin and mammaglobin antibodies in differentiating breast carcinoma (particularly those with a papillary morphology) from Müllerian serous carcinomas. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissue from 21 breast carcinomas (10 micropapillary, 11 usual type ductal carcinomas) and 20 serous carcinomas (12 ovarian and 8 uterine) in addition to 6 cases of metastatic breast cancer to the ovary (5 cases) and cervix (1 case) were evaluated for the pattern and intensity of reactivity to antibodies to mesothelin, mammaglobin, and GCDFP-15. None of the breast carcinomas stained for mesothelin, whereas 8/12 and 3/8 ovarian and uterine serous carcinomas were positive; however, 7 of these had less than 10% positivity. Mammaglobin was negative in all serous carcinomas. When compared with GCDFP-15, mammaglobin was more frequently and diffusely expressed in breast carcinomas (GCDFP-15 positivity in 8/21 and mammaglobin positivity in 14/21). This study indicates that the addition of mammaglobin to immunohistochemical panels is useful in distinguishing metastatic breast carcinoma from a new primary ovarian or uterine malignancy. Mesothelin is extremely specific in this scenario but can be technically challenging to interpret due to the common patchy, focal staining.

WT1 expression in endometrioid ovarian carcinoma with and without associated endometriosis

AIMS

To determine how frequently endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (EOC) express WT1 protein, and to correlate the results with the presence of endometriosis and p53 immunoreactivity.

METHODS

Forty-one grade 1-2 EOC were stained immunohistochemically for WT1 and p53 proteins. Twenty-one tumours were associated with endometriosis and 20 cases lacked such an association. WT1 expression in the tumour cell nuclei and/or cytoplasm was recorded. Nuclear p53 staining was assessed as diffuse (>50% cells positive), focal, or negative.

RESULTS

Four of the 20 (20%) tumours in the endometriosis negative group showed nuclear WT1 staining, while none of the endometriosis-associated EOC was positive (p < 0.05). Two of the immunoreactive cases exhibited sertoliform/sex cord-like patterns. Focal cytoplasmic WT1 labelling was present in seven EOC, three of which showed sertoliform, spindle cell or corded and hyaline patterns. There was no correlation between WT1 expression and p53 immunoreactivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Nuclear WT1 expression is present in a minority of EOC and this should be considered if immunohistochemistry is used as an adjunct in sub-typing ovarian carcinomas. The negative correlation of WT1 staining with endometriosis supports the possibility that some EOC, including unusual histological variants, arise from the ovarian surface epithelium. Further studies of EOC should document any association with endometriosis.

Carcinoma of extrahepatic bile ducts and gallbladder metastatic to the ovary: a report of 16 cases

Information on ovarian metastasis of carcinoma of the extrahepatic bile ducts and gallbladder is limited. Sixteen examples are reported; 3 primary tumors were hilar cholangiocarcinomas, 5 common bile duct carcinomas, and 8 gallbladder carcinomas. The patients ranged from 21 to 87 years (mean, 59 years); 7 presented to gynecologists with nonspecific pelvic symptoms similar to primary ovarian neoplasms. The primary tumor was identified before the detection of the ovarian lesions in 5 cases, was simultaneously detected with the ovarian metastases in 9, and was diagnosed postoperatively in 2. All but one case had bilateral ovarian involvement. The thirty-one ovarian lesions included twenty-nine grossly abnormal ovaries that were enlarged (range, 3.0-16.5 cm, mean, 9.4 cm) and 2 ovaries with only microscopic involvement. The sectioned surface was solid in 9, solid-cystic in 15, and multicystic in 5. Microscopically, ovarian surface implants were seen in 66%, multinodular growth in 58%, and infiltrative stromal invasion in 81%. Mucinous epithelial differentiation was seen in 81%, sometimes with foci of benign-like or borderline-like epithelium simulating primary ovarian mucinous neoplasia. Cystadenoma and cystadenofibroma of nonmucinous type was even mimicked strikingly in some cases because of flattening of epithelium lining glands and cysts. Signet ring cells were present in sufficient quantity for a diagnosis of Krukenberg tumor in four tumors. Colloid-type carcinoma was observed at least focally in 3 tumors. Nonmucinous carcinomatous components included adenocarcinoma with high-grade endometrioid-like morphology in 2 cases, papillary adenocarcinoma simulating mixed müllerian epithelial adenocarcinoma in 1, and undifferentiated carcinoma in 2. Immunohistochemical studies in 8 cases showed a positive reaction for cytokeratin 7 in all and for cytokeratin 20 in 4 cases. The high rate of bilaterality, surface involvement, multinodular growth, and heterogeneity of patterns were the most helpful features for indicating a metastatic nature, with signet ring cells also being helpful in the minority of cases in which they were present. Although the diagnosis of a metastatic tumor to the ovary is possible in most of the cases based on standard diagnostic criteria, problems in the differential diagnosis may be posed by morphologic patterns that overlap strikingly with primary ovarian neoplasms, benign, borderline, and malignant, as discussed herein.

Clinicopathologic features and treatment strategies for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and ovarian metastases

BACKGROUND

Ovarian metastases from pancreatic adenocarcinoma are uncommon and data on the clinical features, treatment, and survival of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with ovarian metastases is limited. The purpose of this study is to define the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies for this patient population.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 18 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with ovarian metastasis who had presented to The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1985 to 2005.

RESULTS

Of the 18 patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and ovarian metastases, 8 (44%) presented with ovarian metastases initially and a pancreatic primary tumor became apparent only on further imaging or during surgery. On pathology review, the primary pancreatic cancers (5 out of 18) and ovarian metastases (8 out of 16) showed mucinous characteristics. Patients who underwent resection of their ovarian metastases followed by chemotherapy had a trend of longer median survival compared to patients who received chemotherapy alone without resection of the ovarian metastases (16.5 vs. 8.5 months, respectively; p=0.28). Patients who responded to chemotherapy had a trend of longer survival compared to nonresponders (19 vs. 6 months, respectively; p=0.1). No responses were observed in the ovarian metastases to chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma with synchronous ovarian metastases may present initially as symptomatic ovarian masses and they commonly have mucinous histologic characteristics. Surgical resection of ovarian metastases may play an important palliative role in the treatment of symptomatic patients with good performance status and lead to longer survival.

Immunohistochemical biomarkers of value in distinguishing primary ovarian carcinoma from gastric carcinoma: a systematic review with statistical meta-analysis

AIMS

To compare the relative risk of antigen expression being detected immunohistochemically in ovarian and gastric carcinoma aggregated from studies performed for diagnostic purposes, with the relative risks of their expression in all patients in the English literature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Both types of series indicated that cytokeratin (CK) 7 expression was greater and that of CK20 and carcinoembryonic antigen less in ovarian than in gastric carcinoma (P < 0.05). Synthesis of all data available for MUC-2 suggested it was more commonly expressed in ovarian carcinoma, whereas the relative risk in papers that directly compared its expression suggested that it was more common in the gastric carcinoma (P = 0.2, NS). Aggregating all possible data suggested villin was more likely to be expressed in ovarian cancers, whereas studies in which its expression was compared directly in both tumours suggested the opposite. Although statistically significant, patient numbers were small.

CONCLUSION

Provided sufficient numbers of cases are studied, analysis of studies comparing antigen expression for diagnostic purposes in tumours from two body sites is likely to be supported in the wider literature. The design of such comparative studies is informed by aggregating data from single tumour studies.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma metastatic to the ovary: a report of 16 cases of an underemphasized form of secondary tumor in the ovary that may mimic primary neoplasia

The potential for adenocarcinoma metastatic to the ovary to mimic primary mucinous neoplasms is a well-known issue to surgical pathologists, most of the recent literature emphasizing pancreatic and various other origins for the ovarian metastases. Although an origin in the gallbladder or extrahepatic bile ducts is acknowledged for some cases little information exists on tumors originating within the intrahepatic bile ducts. Sixteen cases of this type were retrieved from the surgical pathology files of the Chiang Mai University Hospital between January 1992 and December 2006. The patients ranged from 38 to 74 years (mean 52). Thirteen presented with nonspecific pelvic symptoms similar to primary ovarian neoplasms. The hepatic tumors were radiologically detected before the ovarian lesion in 2 cases. Hepatic and ovarian masses were simultaneously detected by preoperative radiologic studies or at exploratory laparotomy in 10 cases. In the remaining 4 cases, the hepatic lesions were detected postoperatively. There were a total of 26 metastatic ovarian lesions which included 22 clinically recognized ovarian masses (range 3 to 20 cm, mean 11.8 cm). Bilateral involvement was present in 10 cases (62%) and unilateral involvement in 6 (38%). The cut surfaces of the 22 grossly enlarged ovaries were predominantly solid in 5, solid-cystic in 10, and multicystic in 7. Microscopically, surface implants were observed in 80% of tumors, multinodular growth in 48%, and infiltrative stromal invasion (including microinvasionlike foci as it would be applied if the tumors were primary) in 86%. The neoplastic epithelium typically formed glands that ranged from small to large and cystically dilated, but small clusters of cells and individual cells were also seen. The epithelium ranged from tall, columnar, and mucinous in appearance to cuboidal or flattened and nonspecific. The tumors most closely mimicked primary mucinous neoplasms although a resemblance to other mullerian neoplasms was also seen. Foci often mimicked mucinous borderline tumors of typical type or with intraepithelial carcinoma and benign-appearing mucinous epithelium was seen in 62% of tumors. Immunohistochemical studies in 15 cases showed a positive reaction for cytokeratin 7 in all and for cytokeratin 20 in 5 cases. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should be included in the list of origins of possible ovarian metastatic tumors that mimic primary ovarian mucinous neoplasia, particularly in parts of the world where cholangiocarcinoma of the liver is relatively common.

The histological diagnosis of metastases to the breast from extramammary malignancies

This study aims to review histological and immunohistochemical features that are useful in the diagnosis of metastases to the breast. Histological features were compared between non-haematological metastases to the breast and 100 consecutive core biopsy specimens of primary invasive carcinomas of the breast. 18 non-haematological metastases to the breast were diagnosed over a 10-year period (0.3% of malignant mammary tumours). Elastosis and carcinoma in situ were seen only in primary mammary cancers. Two-thirds of tumours had features raising the possibility of metastasis, such as clear cell carcinoma suggestive of renal origin and small cell carcinoma suggestive of pulmonary origin. The features observed in haematological metastases are also described. Immunohistochemical panels to distinguish mammary carcinoma (oestrogen receptor, gross cystic fluid protein-15) from common metastases to the breast, including carcinoma of the lung (thyroid transcription factor-1), malignant melanoma (S100, HMB45, melan-A) and ovarian serous papillary carcinoma (Wilms' tumour 1), are discussed. The pathologist has a key role in considering the diagnosis of metastasis to the breast if the histological features are unusual for a primary mammary tumour. The clinical history is vital in some cases. Immunohistochemistry plays a useful supplementary role.

Clinicopathological significance of WT1 expression in ovarian cancer: a possible accelerator of tumor progression in serous adenocarcinoma

Recently, oncogenic potential of the WT1 gene has been proposed in some human solid tumors and leukemias. Although previous studies have shown the frequent expression of the WT1 protein in ovarian serous adenocarcinomas (OSAs), its clinicopathologic significance is still unclear. We immunohistochemically examined the expression status of WT1 in 119 OSAs and analyzed the correlation of the intensity of WT1 immunoreactivity with the level of WT1 mRNA expression by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, clinicopathologic variables, expression of p53, Bcl-2, and Ki-67 labeling index (LI). Of 119 OSAs, nuclear WT1 immunoreactivity was positive in 99 (83%), of which 44 (44%) and 55 (56%) exhibited high and low WT1 immunoreactivities, respectively. The quantitative WT1 mRNA levels were significantly correlated with the intensity of WT1 immunoreactivity (P < 0.05). In comparison with WT1-negative OSAs, the WT1-positive OSAs showed a higher grade (P = 0.007), advanced stage (P = 0.018), and higher Ki-67 LI (P < 0.001). Additionally, high WT1 immunoreactivity was correlated with a higher grade (P = 0.003), Ki-67 LI (P = 0.012), Bcl-2 expression (P = 0.003), and poorer patient outcome (5-year survival, 36.5 vs 63.8%, P = 0.008 by log-rank test). The WT1 protein may be an accelerator of the progression of OSA.

Ovarian Mucinous Tumors Associated With Mature Cystic Teratomas

Most primary ovarian mucinous tumors are of surface epithelial-stromal origin and exhibit diffuse expression of cytokeratin 7 (CK7) combined with variable expression of cytokeratin 20 (CK20); this immunoprofile distinguishes them from most lower gastrointestinal tract tumors secondarily involving the ovaries. The uncommon ovarian mucinous tumors of germ cell (teratomatous) origin have not been extensively evaluated to determine the utility of these markers and other markers of intestinal differentiation for distinguishing these tumors from metastatic gastrointestinal tract mucinous tumors. Immunohistochemical expression of CK7, CK20, CDX2, and villin was assessed in 44 ovarian mucinous tumors associated with a mature cystic teratoma. All cases lacked evidence of a nonovarian primary mucinous tumor. All mucinous tumors were unilateral; 6 cases had bilateral teratomas. All tumors displayed gastrointestinal-type mucinous differentiation, with epithelium that was commonly goblet cell-rich or hypermucinous; 21 were associated with pseudomyxoma ovarii and 3 of these had pseudomyxoma peritonei. Tumor architecture ranged from purely cystadenomatous (n=24), to proliferative (n=13), to carcinomatous (n=6); some tumors had admixtures of these patterns. One tumor had a goblet cell carcinoidlike pattern with pseudomyxoma ovarii. Three carcinomas had a signet ring cell component. Cystadenomatous tumors without pseudomyxoma ovarii (n=15) exhibited all possible CK7/CK20 coordinate expression profiles with nearly equal frequency. All proliferative tumors without pseudomyxoma ovarii (n=8) expressed CK7, most often in combination with CK20 expression. All cystadenomatous and proliferative tumors with pseudomyxoma ovarii (n=9 and n=5) were CK7-/CK20+. All carcinomatous tumors had pseudomyxoma ovarii; 3 were CK7-/CK20+, 2 were CK7+/CK20+, and 1 was CK7+/CK20-. The presence of pseudomyxoma ovarii was significantly associated with a CK7-/CK20+ profile (86% with pseudomyxoma ovarii vs. 13% without, P<0.0001), CDX2 positivity (79% vs. 0%, P<0.0001), and villin positivity (57% vs. 5%, P=0.0009). A subset of mucinous tumors associated with mature cystic teratomas exhibiting morphologic and immunohistochemical features of lower intestinal tract-type mucinous tumors may be teratomatous in origin. In practice, the more common diagnosis of secondary involvement by a lower intestinal tract mucinous tumor should be addressed in the pathology report and in subsequent clinical evaluation; interpretation as a true primary ovarian mucinous tumor of teratomatous origin can be considered as an alternative diagnosis when evaluation and follow-up fail to identify a nonovarian source of the mucinous tumor. Those tumors having CK7 expression with or without CK20 expression may be derived from upper gastrointestinal tract-type or sinonasal-type teratomatous elements but could be independent tumors of surface epithelial-stromal origin.

Evidence-based Guidelines for the Utilization of Immunostains in Diagnostic Pathology: Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma Versus Mesothelioma

There are no firmly established guidelines for the use of antibodies in immunohistology as individual tests or panels. Practicing pathologists must rely on information available in individual publications, review articles, books, and internet-based databases to develop diagnostic immunohistochemical algorithms for their individual practices. In contrast, other medical specialties have crafted many evidence-based practice guidelines (EBG) that are widely used; these have helped to augment standardization and cost effectiveness. In particular, the use of several "epithelial" and "mesothelial" antibodies has been proposed to distinguish epithelioid malignant mesothelioma from metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Other authors have previously done systematic literature reviews of this subject up through 2004 and integrated the results of 88 publications into summarized test-performance values for 15 preselected immunohistochemical markers. The results suggested that 7 tests provide optimal sensitivity and specificity (MOC-31, BG8, CEA, TTF-1, CK5/6, WT-1, and HBME-1), but they provide no guidance for integration of such data into EBG. Odds ratios (ORs) were employed to compare the effectiveness of any single test, and chosen combinations thereof, in the differential diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma and metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Surprisingly, selected single immunostains or antibody pairs yielded ORs (varying from 96.34 to 1233.19) that were equal or better in efficacy when compared with more comprehensive panels. These results support the potential value of systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and OR calculations for development of EBG in diagnostic immunohistology.

p16 expression in primary ovarian mucinous and endometrioid tumors and metastatic adenocarcinomas in the ovary: utility for identification of metastatic HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinomas

Distinction of primary ovarian epithelial tumors from metastatic adenocarcinomas is challenging for tumors exhibiting mucinous, endometrioid, or mixed endometrioid/mucinous differentiation. Metastatic carcinomas with these types of differentiation can be derived from several sites, including the gastrointestinal tract and the uterus. Most endocervical adenocarcinomas exhibit mucinous and/or endometrioid differentiation; they infrequently metastasize to the ovaries but may simulate primary ovarian tumors [both atypical proliferative (borderline) and carcinoma]. Most are high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-related and demonstrate diffuse p16 over-expression due to complex molecular mechanisms by which high-risk HPV transforming proteins interact with cell cycle regulatory proteins. The performance of this expression pattern for identifying metastatic endocervical adenocarcinomas in the ovaries among primary ovarian tumors and other metastatic adenocarcinomas having mucinous and/or endometrioid/endometrioidlike differentiation has not been evaluated. Immunohistochemical expression of p16 was assessed in 195 tumors, including 98 primary ovarian tumors (51 mucinous, 47 endometrioid, and 4 mixed mucinous-endometrioid tumors), 93 metastatic adenocarcinomas of known primary sites (colorectum: 34, endocervix: 19, pancreaticobiliary tract: 17, appendix: 7, stomach: 5), 11 metastatic adenocarcinomas of unknown origin (7 established as noncervical), and 4 adenocarcinomas of uncertain (primary ovarian vs. metastatic) origin. The HPV status of the endocervical adenocarcinomas was determined by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (when in situ hybridization was negative). Expression was assessed based on the percentage of moderately to strongly positive cells, estimated to the nearest 10%. Mean and median expression values for HPV-positive endocervical adenocarcinomas (99%, 100%; range 90% to 100%) were substantially higher than those for primary ovarian mucinous (5%, 0%; range 0% to 70%) and endometrioid (20%, 10%; range 0% to 100%) tumors, HPV-unrelated endocervical adenocarcinomas (0%, 0%; range 0% to 60%), metastatic adenocarcinomas of unknown origin (11%, 0%; range 0% to 30%), and adenocarcinomas of uncertain (primary ovarian vs. metastatic) origin (40%, 35%; range 0% to 90%); only the 15 HPV-positive endocervical adenocarcinomas and 6 other tumors had values of 80% or greater. Diffuse (>75% positive tumor cells) moderate to strong p16 expression is a sensitive (100%) and specific (97%) marker for identifying HPV-related endocervical adenocarcinomas metastatic to the ovary among the primary ovarian tumors and metastatic adenocarcinomas from other sites that are in the differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors having mucinous and/or endometrioid/endometrioidlike differentiation. p16 is useful as part of a panel of immunohistochemical markers for distinguishing primary ovarian tumors from metastases and, when diffusely positive, can suggest the cervix as a potential primary site for metastatic adenocarcinomas of unknown origin.

Expression level of Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) protein has limited prognostic value in epithelial ovarian cancer: from the Danish "MALOVA" ovarian cancer study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the WT1 expression level in tumor tissues from 774 women with an epithelial ovarian tumor. Secondly, to evaluate whether WT1 tissue expression levels correlate with clinico-pathological parameters and finally to investigate the prognostic value of WT1 expression levels in ovarian cancer (OC) patients.

METHODS

Using tissue array we analyzed the WT1 expression level in tissues from 186 women with Low Malignant Potential tumors (LMP) (160 stage I, 5 stage II and 21 stage III) and 560 OC patients (160 stage I, 60 stage II, 289 stage III and 51 stage IV).

RESULTS

Using 10% as cut-off level for WT1 overexpression an overall of 19% LMPs and 17% carcinomas, respectively, were found positive. For both, a higher proportion of positive tumors was found in the serous subtype compared to other histological subtypes (p<0.0001). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis stratified by FIGO stage performed on cases using a 10% cut-off showed a shorter disease specific survival in patients with a positive WT1 expression in the tumor tissue. In a Cox survival analysis including 559 stage I to IV OC prognostic factors included FIGO stage (II vs. I: HR=2.74, 95% CI: 1.42-5.29; III vs. II: HR=2.23, 95% CI: 1.49-3.36; IV vs. III: HR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.25-2.44), residual tumor after primary surgery (HR=2.82, 95% CI: 1.87-4.26), age at diagnosis (HR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03), histological grade 3 of tumor versus grade 1 (grade 2 vs. grade 1: HR=1.31, 95% CI: 0.95-1.81; grade 3 vs. grade 1: HR=1.51, 95% CI: 1.08-2.09) and other histological tumor types vs. serous (mucinous vs. serous: HR=0.91, 95% CI: 0.53-1.56; endometrioid vs. serous: HR=1.02, 95% CI: 0.69-1.50; other histological types vs. serous: HR=1.40, 95% CI: 1.01-1.95). WT1 expression (HR=1.22, 95% CI: 0.94-1.59) had statistically no significant independent impact on survival.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, based on our analyses we found that WT1 expression in clinical settings may be of limited prognostic value in Danish OC patients.

What are the current best immunohistochemical markers for the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma? A review and update

Numerous immunohistochemical markers that can assist in the diagnosis of epithelioid mesotheliomas, some of which have only recently been recognized, are currently available. Because the various types of carcinomas express these markers differently, their selection for inclusion in a diagnostic panel can vary according to the differential diagnosis. This article provides a critical review of all of the information that is presently available on those markers that are believed to have the greatest potential for assisting in distinguishing between epithelioid mesotheliomas and those carcinomas with which they are most likely to be confused. Information is also provided regarding the panels of immunohistochemical markers that are, at present, recommended in these differential diagnoses.

Cytokeratins 7 and 20 in primary and secondary mucinous tumors of the ovary: analysis of coordinate immunohistochemical expression profiles and staining distribution in 179 cases

Coordinate expression profiles for cytokeratins 7 and 20 (CK7 and CK20) are useful for distinguishing certain types of adenocarcinomas but use for distinction of primary and secondary mucinous tumors in the ovary is limited due to the existence of a number of tumor types exhibiting overlapping CK7/CK20 immunoprofiles; the use of staining distribution patterns in the distinction of tumors with shared profiles has not been evaluated in detail. We report analysis of both coordinate expression profiles and staining distribution in 179 rigorously classified mucinous tumors in the ovary, including 53 primary tumors [35 atypical proliferative (borderline) mucinous tumors of gastrointestinal type and 18 invasive mucinous carcinomas] and 126 secondary tumors [28 colorectal adenocarcinomas, 54 appendiceal tumors (23 adenocarcinomas, 31 low-grade adenomatous mucinous tumors associated with pseudomyxoma peritonei), 14 pancreatic adenocarcinomas, 8 endocervical adenocarcinomas, 5 gastric adenocarcinomas, 4 gallbladder/biliary tract adenocarcinomas, and 13 adenocarcinomas of unknown primary sites). A CK7+/CK20+ immunoprofile was the most common profile in primary ovarian tumors (74%), upper gastrointestinal tract tumors (78%), and endocervical tumors (88%) but was occasionally observed in lower intestinal tract tumors (colorectal: 11%; appendiceal: 13% of low-grade tumors, 35% of carcinomas). A CK7-/CK20+ immunoprofile was the most common profile in lower intestinal tract tumors (79%) and was uncommon in upper gastrointestinal tract tumors (9%), rarely seen in primary ovarian tumors (4%), and not seen in endocervical tumors. A CK7+/CK20- profile was observed in some primary ovarian (23%), upper gastrointestinal tract (13%), and endocervical tumors (13%) but not in lower intestinal tract tumors. For CK7+ tumors, staining distribution was very frequently diffuse (>50% of tumors cells positive) in primary ovarian, upper gastrointestinal tract, and endocervical tumors, whereas staining distribution was often focal (<50% of tumors cells positive) when present in colorectal and appendiceal carcinomas but not in low-grade appendiceal tumors. For CK20+ tumors, staining distribution was variable but often focal in primary ovarian tumors and nonlower intestinal tract tumors, whereas the pattern was almost always diffuse in lower intestinal tract tumors. Immunohistochemical staining distribution can supplement CK7/CK20 coordinate expression profiles to distinguish subsets of primary ovarian and metastatic lower intestinal tract mucinous tumors having overlapping immunoprofiles but neither coordinate expression profiles nor staining distribution distinguishes primary ovarian tumors from the nonlower intestinal tract metastases.

My approach to the diagnosis of mesothelial lesions

Mesothelial lesions pose considerable diagnostic challenges not only because benign tumours, reactive proliferations and malignant mesothelioma can mimic one another, but also because the morphological patterns displayed by malignant mesothelioma can simulate a variety of epithelial and non-epithelial malignancies. Immunohistochemical markers can aid in distinguishing epithelioid malignant mesothelioma from metastatic adenocarcinoma, but because no single marker reliably separates all cases, a panel of stains is recommended. Immunohistochemical studies are of more limited value in sarcomatoid malignant mesothelioma, and other features often play an essential role. The separation of reactive mesothelial proliferations from malignant mesothelioma on small biopsy can be quite difficult, as distinguishing features, such as stromal invasion, often cannot be adequately assessed. In adequately sampled lesions, however, the distinction between malignant mesothelioma, benign mesothelial proliferations and other tumours can be achieved in most cases by using a carefully integrated approach that incorporates clinical and radiographic data, immunohistochemical studies and, in selected cases, histochemical and ultrastructural techniques.

WT1 gene expression as a prognostic marker in advanced serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study

BACKGROUND

WT1 is a tumor suppressor gene responsible for Wilms' tumor. WT1 reactivity is limited to ovarian serous carcinomas. Recent studies have shown that WT1 plays an important role in the progression of disease and indicates a poorer prognosis of human malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia and breast cancer. The aims of this study were to determine the survival and recurrence-free survival of women with advanced serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma in relation to WT1 gene expression.

METHODS

The study accrued women over an 18-year period, from 1987-2004. During the study period, 163 patients were diagnosed with advanced serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma and had undergone complete post-operative chemotherapy, but the final study group comprised 99 patients. The records of these women were reviewed and the paraffin-embedded tissue of these women stained with WT1 immunostaining. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods.

RESULTS

Fifty patients showed WT1 staining and forty-nine did not. Five-year survival of non-staining and staining groups were 39.4% and 10.7% (p < 0.00005); five-year recurrence-free survival of these groups were 29.8% and < or = 7.5% (p < 0.00005), respectively. For survival the HR of WT1 staining, adjusted for residual tumor and chemotherapy response, was 1.98 (95% CI 1.28-3.79), and for recurrence-free survival the HR was 3.36 (95% CI 1.60-7.03). The HR for recurrence-free survival was not confounded by any other variables.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that expression of WT1 gene may be indicative of an unfavorable prognosis in patients with advanced serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Value of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing peritoneal mesothelioma from serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum: a review and update

At present, a large number of immunohistochemical markers that can be used in the differential diagnosis between epithelioid peritoneal mesotheliomas and serous carcinomas are available. However, great differences of opinion exist regarding the individual value of some of these markers. This article provides a critical review of all of the information that is currently available on those markers that have the greatest potential for assisting in distinguishing between peritoneal mesotheliomas and serous carcinomas. The conclusion of this review indicates that the positive serous carcinoma markers, by and large, have a higher degree of sensitivity and specificity in assisting in discriminating between these malignancies than the positive mesothelioma markers. From a practical point of view, a combination of MOC-31 (or Ber-EP4), estrogen receptors, and calretinin immunostaining should allow a clear distinction to be made between epithelioid peritoneal mesotheliomas and serous carcinomas in most cases.