Endoscopic mapping and surrogate markers for better surveillance in Barrett esophagus. A study of 700 biopsy specimens

Quantitation of spatial and temporal variability of biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus

Chemoprevention and risk-stratification studies in Barrett's esophagus (BE) rely on biomarkers but the variability in their temporal and spatial expression is unknown. If such variability exists, it will impact sampling techniques and sample size calculations. Specimens from three levels of biopsies over two serial endoscopies in nondysplastic BE patients were analyzed for aneuploidy, proliferation markers (Ki67, Mcm2), and cell cycle markers (cyclin A and cyclin D1). A modification of the image cytometry technique, where cytokeratin staining automatically distinguished epithelial and stromal cells, measured aneuploidy on whole tissue sections. Other biomarkers were studied by immunohistochemistry. Coefficient of variability (SD/mean) was calculated; a value <10% indicated low variability. A total of 120 specimens (20 subjects each with three biopsy levels at two time points) from nondysplastic BE patients (71 ± 8.8 years, all Caucasian, 90% males, C5.1M7.5 ± 3.4 cm) were analyzed. The mean interval between endoscopies was 32.8 ± 8.4 months. Aneuploidy had a spatial variability of 6.8% at visit 1 (mean diploid index: 1.1 ± 0.09) and 7.9% at visit 2 (mean diploid index: 1.1 ± 0.06) and a temporal variability of 7.0-8.1% for the three levels. For other biomarkers, the spatial variability ranged from ∼5 to 30% at visit 1 and 11-92% at visit 2 and the temporal variability ranged from 0 to 77%. To conclude, of all the biomarkers, only aneuploidy had both spatial and temporal variability of <10%. Spatial and temporal variability were biomarker dependent and could be as high as 90% even without progression. These data will be useful to design chemoprevention and risk-stratification studies in BE.

Barrett's Esophagus: A Comprehensive and Contemporary Review for Pathologists

This review provides a summary of our current understanding of, and the controversies surrounding, the diagnosis, pathogenesis, histopathology, and molecular biology of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and associated neoplasia. BE is defined as columnar metaplasia of the esophagus. There is worldwide controversy regarding the diagnostic criteria of BE, mainly with regard to the requirement to histologically identify goblet cells in biopsies. Patients with BE are at increased risk for adenocarcinoma, which develops in a metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Surveillance of patients with BE relies heavily on the presence and grade of dysplasia. However, there are significant pathologic limitations and diagnostic variability in evaluating dysplasia, particularly with regard to the more recently recognized unconventional variants. Identification of non-morphology-based biomarkers may help risk stratification of BE patients, and this is a subject of ongoing research. Because of recent achievements in endoscopic therapy, there has been a major shift in the treatment of BE patients with dysplasia or intramucosal cancer away from esophagectomy and toward endoscopic mucosal resection and ablation. The pathologic issues related to treatment and its complications are also discussed in this review article.

Barrett esophagus: diagnostic challenges

The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma and associated mortality has risen dramatically over the past several decades, and, thus, it is increasingly important to understand its pathogenesis and risk factors. Barrett esophagus is the established precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma that progresses through a metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Its risk of transforming to carcinoma is not as high as previously reported and there appears to be a biological heterogeneity among patients with this disease. The overall prevalence of Barrett esophagus in the United States ranges from 1% to 25% and is closer to 5% in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Because of the frequency of Barrett esophagus and associated implications, it is important for the practicing pathologist to have a thorough understanding of this disease and its diagnostic pitfalls. In this review, we will discuss issues associated with the diagnosis of Barrett esophagus, including the definition of Barrett esophagus and its distinction from carditis with intestinal metaplasia. We will also discuss challenges in the grading of dysplasia and new variants of dysplasia, including crypt dysplasia and foveolar-type dysplasia. Finally, we will touch upon the evaluation of dysplasia in endoscopic mucosal resection specimens.

Ki-67 Antigen Overexpression Is Associated with the Metaplasia-Adenocarcinoma Sequence in Barrett's Esophagus

Introduction. The objective of this study was to evaluate Ki-67 antigen expression in patients with Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma and to assess its correlation with the metaplasia-esophageal adenocarcinoma progression. Methods. Using immunohistochemistry we evaluated the Ki-67 index in patients with Barrett's esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and controls. We included patients with endoscopically visible columnar mucosa of the distal esophagus (whose biopsies revealed specialized intestinal-type metaplasia), patients with esophageal and esophagogastric tumors types I and II, and patients with histologically normal gastric mucosa (control). Results. In the 57 patients studied there were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to age or race. Patients with cancer were predominantly men. The Ki-67 index averaged 10 ± 4 % in patients with normal gastric mucosa (n = 17), 21 ± 15 % in patients with Barrett's esophagus (n = 21), and 38 ± 16 % in patients with cancer (n = 19). Ki-67 expression was significantly different between all groups (P < 0.05). There was a strong linear correlation between Ki-67 expression and the metaplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence (P < 0.01). In patients with cancer, Ki-67 was not associated with clinical or surgical staging. Conclusions. Ki-67 antigen has increased expression along the metaplasia-adenocarcinoma sequence. There is a strong linear correlation between Ki-67 proliferative activity and Barrett's carcinogenesis.

An oncofetal protein IMP3: a new molecular marker for the detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia

Accurate diagnosis of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett esophagus is critical for clinical decision-making and patient management. IMP3 is an oncofetal protein and has been demonstrated to be associated with aggressive tumor behavior. The aim of this study was to establish the expression pattern and diagnostic value of IMP3 in Barrett esophagus, dysplasia, and carcinoma. A total of 217 cases (resection, n=56; biopsy, n=161) with 302 lesions (invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma, n=147; metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma, n=14; high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus, n=52; low-grade dysplasia of the esophagus gland, n=21; and Barrett esophagus, n=68) were examined by immunohistochemistry for IMP3 expression. IMP3 showed strong cytoplasmic granular staining in 138 of 147 (94%) of invasive esophageal adenocarcinomas, 13 of 14 (93%) of metastatic esophageal adenocarcinomas, and 49 of 52 (94%) of high-grade dysplasias. In contrast, 3/21 (14%) of low-grade dysplasia and 5/68 (7%) Barrett esophagus were positive for IMP3. Expression of IMP3 was not found in adjacent benign squamous and glandular mucosa. Our findings indicate that IMP3 is a highly sensitive and specific biomarker for the diagnosis of invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia. The data also suggest that IMP3, an oncofetal protein, may play an important role in malignant transformation in esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Increasing cyclooxygenase-2 (cox-2) gene expression in the progression of Barrett's esophagus to adenocarcinoma correlates with that of Bcl-2

Previous studies from our laboratory and others have suggested that increased expression of cox-2 is important in the genesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. In vitro studies suggest that cox-2 regulates expression of the anti-apoptotic protein bcl-2, thus possibly accounting for reduced apoptosis in carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship of these 2 genes in the development of Barrett's-associated adenocarcinoma. Histologic sections from endoscopic biopsies or esophagectomy specimens were classified as non-dysplastic Barrett's (n = 30), intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 12) and adenocarcinoma (n = 48). The desired tissue was isolated by laser capture microdissection and expression levels of cox-2 and bcl-2 were measured by quantitative real-time PCR (Taqman). Gene expression levels were compared to samples of the distal esophageal squamous epithelium (n = 55) and reflux-esophagitis (n = 25), without Barrett's or cancer. Expression of both bcl-2 and cox-2 were increased in non-dysplastic Barrett's (p = 0.0077, p = 0.0037), intraepithelial neoplasia (p = 0.0053, p = 0.0220) and adenocarcinoma (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001) compared to squamous epithelium or reflux-esophagitis. Furthermore, there is a significant correlation between these two genes, especially in carcinoma (p < 0.0001).

AMACR Immunostaining is Useful in Detecting Dysplastic Epithelium in Barrett's Esophagus, Ulcerative Colitis, and Crohn's Disease

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) catalyzes the racemization of alpha-methyl, branched carboxylic coenzyme A thioesters, and is overexpressed in a variety of neoplasms, such as prostate and colon cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate AMACR expression in the metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in Barrett's esophagus (BE), ulcerative colitis (UC), and Crohn's disease (CD) and to determine whether its expression can be used to detect dysplastic epithelium in these conditions. One hundred thirty-four routinely processed biopsy and/or resection specimens from 134 patients with BE [M/F ratio: 5.7, mean age: 67 y (36 negative (intestinal metaplasia only), 14 indefinite for dysplasia (IND), 16 low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 32 high-grade dysplasia (HGD), and 36 invasive adenocarcinoma (ACA)] and 74 specimens from 74 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [56 with ulcerative colitis, 18 with Crohn's disease, M/F ratio: 1.8, mean age: 55 y (17 negative, 7 IND, 26 LGD, 10 HGD, and 14 ACA)] were immunostained with a monoclonal AMACR antibody (p504S). The degree of cytoplasmic staining in all cases was evaluated in a blinded fashion according to the following grading system: 0, negative (0% cells positive); 1+, 1% to 10% cells positive; 2+, 10% to 50% cells positive; or 3+, >50% cells positive. In patients with BE, AMACR was not expressed in any negative foci (0%) but was significantly increased (P<0.0001) in foci of LGD (38%), HGD (81%), and ACA (72%). Three of 14 (21%) IND foci from 3 BE patients were only focally positive (grade 1: 7%, 2: 14%). However, 1 of these 3 patients had follow-up information available and had developed ACA subsequently. Similarly, in patients with IBD, AMACR was not expressed in any foci considered negative for dysplasia, but was significantly increased (P<0.0001) in foci of LGD (96%), HGD (80%), and ACA (71%). Only 1/7 (14%) IND focus from 1 patient was focally positive (grade 1). The sensitivity for the detection of LGD and HGD in BE and IBD was 38% and 81%, and 96% and 80%, respectively, for the 2 types of disorders. The specificity was 100% for both BE and IBD. AMACR is involved in the neoplastic progression in BE and IBD. The high degree of specificity of AMACR for dysplasia/carcinoma in BE and IBD suggests that it may be useful to detect neoplastic epithelium in these conditions.

Gastroesophageal reflux and cancer

The causal relationship between GERD and esophageal adenocarcinoma, although unclear just a few decades ago, now is established fairly well. The physiologic changes and the biocellular alterations of the damaged esophageal mucosa are documented better. Despite this knowledge, the dramatic increase in the incidence of esophageal cancer cannot be explained. The absolute risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma arising from GERD is low, and, at present, does not justify population-screening programs. Still, with the notion that adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is an aggressive cancer once documented, important questions still are in need of answers for patients suffering from reflux symptoms. Patients who have reflux disease are not necessarily symptomatic. It remains unclear if patients experiencing reflux symptoms should undergo mandatory endoscopy with biopsies at the esophagogastric junction. Furthermore, metaplasia of the lower esophagus often is not readily recognizable at endoscopy, and only biopsies can document abnormal histology. A severe and prolonged history of reflux always should orient to the possibility of a reflux-related columnar-lined esophagus. Once documented, Barrett's esophagus needs to be seen as a premalignant condition not necessarily leading to adenocarcinoma formation; despite their increased risk of tumor formation, most patients who have Barrett's esophagus die of other causes. During regular endoscopic follow-up, multilevel circumferential biopsies should document the evolution of the histologic changes in the lower esophagus and at the gastroesophageal junction of these patients. It is the only method available to document the appearance of dysplasia. It still is unclear if medicine or surgery provides the best quality of life and the best protection against the development of dysplasia and the possible progression toward adenocarcinoma formation when intestinal metaplasia is present in the esophagus.

CDC2/CDK1 expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma and precursor lesions serves as a diagnostic and cancer progression marker and potential novel drug target

Esophageal adenocarcinoma arises through well-defined precursor lesions (Barrett esophagus), although only a subset of these lesions advances to invasive adenocarcinoma. The lack of markers predicting progression in Barrett esophagus, typical presentation at advanced stage, and limitations of conventional chemotherapy result in >90% mortality for Barrett-associated adenocarcinomas. To identify potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets, we compared gene expression profiles from Barrett-associated esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines (BIC1, SEG1, KYAE, OE33) and normal esophageal epithelial scrapings utilizing the Affymetrix U133_A gene expression platform. We identified 560 transcripts with >3-fold up-regulation in the adenocarcinoma cell lines compared with normal epithelium. Utilizing tissue microarrays composed of normal esophageal squamous mucosa (n = 20), Barrett esophagus (n = 10), low-grade dysplasia (n = 14), high-grade dysplasia (n = 27), adenocarcinoma (n = 59), and node metastases (n = 27), we confirmed differential up-regulation of three proteins (Cdc2/Cdk1, Cdc5, and Igfbp3) in adenocarcinomas and Barrett lesions. Protein expression mirrored histologic progression; thus, 87% of low-grade dysplasias had at least focal surface Cdc2/Cdk1 and 20% had >5% surface staining; 96% of high-grade dysplasias expressed abundant surface Cdc2/Cdk1, while invasive adenocarcinoma and metastases demonstrated ubiquitous expression. Esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines treated with the novel CDC2/CDK1 transcriptional inhibitor, tetra-O-methyl nordihydroguaiaretic acid (EM-1421, formerly named M4N) demonstrated a dose-dependent reduction in cell proliferation, paralleling down-regulation of CDC2/CDK1 transcript and protein levels. These findings suggest a role for CDC2/CDK1 in esophageal adenocarcinogenesis, both as a potential histopathologic marker of dysplasia and a putative treatment target.

Dysplasia and risk of further neoplastic progression in a regional Veterans Administration Barrett's cohort

OBJECTIVES

No published data are available on the risk of further neoplastic progression in Barrett's patients stratified by baseline dysplasia status. Our aims were to estimate and compare the risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia or cancer in groups of Barrett's patients stratified by baseline dysplasia status.

METHODS

Consecutive Barrett's cases from 1988-2002 were identified via pathology databases in a regional VA health-care system and medical record data were abstracted. The risk of progression to high-grade dysplasia or cancer was measured and compared in cases with versus without low-grade dysplasia within 1 yr of index endoscopy using survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 575 Barrett's cases had 2,775 patient-years of follow-up. There were 13 incident cases of high-grade dysplasia and two of cancer. The crude rate of high-grade dysplasia or cancer was 1 of 78 patient-years for those with baseline dysplasia versus 1 of 278 patient-years for those without (p= 0.001). One case of high-grade dysplasia in each group underwent successful therapy. One incident cancer case underwent successful resection and the other was unresectable. Two cases with high-grade dysplasia later developed cancer, one died postoperatively, the other was unresectable. When these two cases were included (total of four cancers), the crude rate of cancer was 1 of 274 patient-years for those with baseline dysplasia versus 1 of 1,114 patient-years for those without.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort study of Barrett's, incident malignancy was uncommon. The rate of progression to high-grade dysplasia or cancer was significantly higher in those with baseline low-grade dysplasia. These data may warrant reevaluation of current Barrett's surveillance strategies.

ErbB2 without erbB3 expression in metaplastic columnar epithelium of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

ErbB2 expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma has been shown to correlate with its clinicopathological features. However, expression levels for EGF receptor, erbB2 and erbB3 in specialized columnar epithelium (SCE) of Barrett's esophagus have yet to be determined. To investigate the relationship between EGF family receptors and Barrett's esophagus, we examined expression levels for EGF receptor, erbB2 and erbB3 in SCE of Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

10 consecutive patients with short- and long-segment Barrett's esophagus, and 10 control subjects without organic esophago-gastric diseases were enrolled. Biopsy samples of Barrett's mucosa stained or not stained with methylene blue applied endoscopically were used for histological evaluation and Western blot analysis of EGF receptor, erbB2 and erbB3 proteins.

RESULTS

Mean length of Barrett's esophagus was 2.6 cm (range 1-8 cm) and all tissue samples from methylene blue stained Barrett's mucosa consisted of non-dysplastic SCE. In the Barrett's group, Western blot analysis showed that EGF receptor and erbB2 were equally and strongly expressed in SCE and squamous epithelium; in contrast, erbB3 expression in SCE was considerably weaker. In control subjects, all proteins showed strong expression for all samples. Immunohistochemical analysis of SCE in Barrett's esophagus showed positive EGF receptor and erbB2 expression, and no erbB3 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

ErbB2 is strongly expressed in both non-dysplastic SCE and squamous epithelium, whereas erbB3 expression is essentially limited to the squamous epithelium. .

A Pilot Surrogate End Point Biomarker Trial of Perillyl Alcohol in Breast Neoplasia

PURPOSE

Efficient strategies to screen promising agents in early phase development are essential for rapid progress in breast cancer chemoprevention. We report our experience with the natural compound perillyl alcohol (POH) administered in a short-term surrogate end point biomarker (SEB) protocol, using the "window" between diagnostic and definitive surgery.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Eligible patients included those with a diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular carcinoma in situ, or invasive carcinoma (<3 cm in size) that required further surgery. Thirty-seven of 267 women screened were enrolled in the study (14%). Five women received single-dose POH (1.5 g/m2) 2 days before surgery, 16 received escalating doses of POH (1.2 g/m2 to 4.8 g/m2/day) for 2 days before surgery, and 16 served as untreated controls. Exploratory SEB analysis [estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, proliferation, apoptosis, M6P/insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-2R, IGF1, IGF2 and transforming growth factor beta] was conducted before and after POH.

RESULTS

Only a small portion of the population screened entered the study. Reasons for nonparticipation included protocol ineligibility, conflict of timing of surgery, miscellaneous logistical reasons, or patient's choice. POH administration was well tolerated and did not interfere with surgical management. The power to observe changes in candidate SEB was diminished by a 44% incidence of cases in which the index lesion was not present in the definitive surgical specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative POH exposure was safe and suitable for a more definitive phase II SEB study. Further investigations must overcome logistical obstacles to accrual, and they must focus on approaches to maximize tissue collection and to incorporate genomic analysis of target lesions.

Evaluation of p53 mutations in premalignant esophageal lesions and esophageal adenocarcinoma using laser capture microdissection

p53 mutations have been implicated in the development of esophageal malignancies. The purpose of this study was to assess more accurately the incidence and types of p53 mutations in Barrett's esophagus (BE) with and without dysplasia and in esophageal adenocarcinoma, using pure preparations of epithelial cells obtained by laser capture microdissection (LCM). Assays were performed on paraffin-embedded tissue samples of normal antrum and premalignant and malignant esophageal samples from 57 patients, including 16 controls, 10 with BE metaplasia alone, 20 with BE-associated dysplasia, and 11 with BE-associated adenocarcinoma. All tissues were processed for LCM. DNA was extracted from isolated cells, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using oligonucleutide primers for exons 5-8 of p53. PCR products were processed for DNA sequencing. p53 sequence abnormalities were identified in 2/16 cases of normal antrum and regenerative/chemical gastritis, 1/10 cases of BE, 1/20 cases of BE with dysplasia, and 2/11 cases of adenocarcinomas. The abnormalities occurred in exons 7 and 8 in the form of point mutations. Our results, using LCM, show that p53 gene mutations are relatively rare in esophageal preneoplastic and neoplastic conditions. Only point mutations were detected, but no deletions/insertions were identified.

Biomarkers of esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus

The rising incidence and poor prognosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the Western world have intensified research efforts into earlier methods of detection of this disease and its relationship to Barrett's esophagus. The progression of Barrett's esophagus to adenocarcinoma has been the focus of particular scrutiny, and a number of potential tissue and serum-based disease biomarkers have emerged. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma are outlined. Tissue biomarkers allowing risk stratification of Barrett's are reviewed as well as strategies currently being used to discover novel biomarkers that will facilitate the early detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Finally, the uses of biomarkers as predictive tests for targeted treatments and as surrogate endpoints in chemoprevention trials are considered.

Endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus

There are many questions regarding the screening and surveiliance of BE for which there are currently no answers. Despite the use of models and extrapolations by some authors to suggest that screening and surveiliance for a cancer of such low incidence will never be justified, others argue just as vociferously that given the continued epidemic rise in incidence of this cancer, the uniformly fatal outcome of these cancers if dianosed after symptoms occur, and the enormous pool of patients remaining at risk for future cancer development, a focused and prudent screening and surveillance strategy for Barrett's-related esophageal adenocarcinoma is justified. The data also show that a single screening examination is probably as effective as almost all subsequent surveilance examinations in detecting advanced neoplasia, and much of the current resource use and energy for screening and surveillance in BE should be directed toward screening. Whether screening should be offered or recommended to only older patients (> 50-55 years), whites, and men is unknown, but it is premature to adopt this strategy until better evidence exist supporting a restricted screening policy. Regarding the optimal surveilance frequency and technique, examinations more frequent than every 3 to 5 years are not justifiable, and until proven otherwise, biopsy specimens should be obtained with the largest forceps that can be used with the endoscopic instrument and "saturation" biopsies from the Barrett's obtained. It is unlikely that too many biopsy specimens can be taken. Furthermore, the safety of this approach has been, proven. It is quite likely that the inverse is not true; clinicians likely can do much more harm by taking too few biopsy specimens. It is hoped that the current intense interest in Barrett's neoplasia allows clinicians to address these critical issues in the years to come and resolve this clinical conundrum.