CDX-2 expression is a common event in primary intestinal-type endocervical adenocarcinoma

Cutaneous Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Scalp With Intestinal Phenotype

Cutaneous adenosquamous carcinoma is a mixed, squamous and glandular, rare malignant tumor of the skin characterized by a mixed, squamous, and glandular differentiation. Few cases of this tumor have been so far reported, and even fewer have been thoroughly studied by immunohistochemistry. We report here an exceptional case of cutaneous adenosquamous carcinoma which showed immunohistochemically features of intestinal differentiation, namely because of the expression of keratin 20 and CDX2, a marker of gastrointestinal tumors.

Expression pattern of placenta specific 8 and keratin 20 in different types of gastrointestinal cancer

The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of keratin 20 (KRT20) and placenta specific 8 (PLAC8) in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer with various differentiation phenotypes. The present study retrospectively investigated archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 12 patients at different stages of GI cancer [four with gastric cancer, four with pancreatic cancer and four with colorectal cancer (CRC)]. The stages were pre-determined, according to differentiation phenotypes, by a pathologist of the Department of Pathology at Sijhih Cathay General Hospital. KRT20 and PLAC8 expression levels were assessed using immunohistochemistry. The CRC cell lines SW620 and Caco-2 were used to assess interactions between KRT20 and PLAC8 via reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. PLAC8 and KRT20 expression was observed consistently only in the well-differentiated CRC tissue samples. Low KRT20 expression levels were observed in the PLAC8 knockdown SW620 cells. In addition, there was a positive association between PLAC8 and KRT20 expression in the differentiated Caco-2 cells. According to the results of the present study, the differentiation status of GI cancer influenced KRT20 expression, particularly in CRC, which may explain why patients with well-differentiated CRC display better clinical outcomes. Therefore, the prognostic significance of KRT20 and PLAC8 may be particularly crucial for patients with CRC displaying a well-differentiated phenotype.

Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma With Solitary Metastasis to the Appendix, Mimicking Primary Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review

Metastatic tumors of the appendix are rare. Endometrial cancer tends to metastasize by directly invading neighboring structures; the lung, liver, bones, and brain are common sites of distant metastasis. Herein, we present a case of a solitary endometrial metastatic tumor in the appendiceal mucosa without serosal involvement that mimicked a primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix. The patient who had undergone a radical hysterectomy for an endometrioid adenocarcinoma 3 years earlier presented to the hospital with a history of persistent right-lower abdominal pain. Physical examination showed tension of the abdominal muscles, tenderness, and rebounding pain on the McBurney's point. Open appendectomy for suspected appendicitis revealed a perforation of the distal appendiceal tip. Opening of the surgical specimen showed a mass that was located in the mucosa of the appendix near the appendicular root and resembled a primary tumor of the appendix. Microscopically, the adenocarcinoma of the appendiceal mucosa showed a transitional relationship with the normal mucosa, involving the submucosa and muscle but not invading the serosa. Based on the patient's medical history and the results of immunohistochemical staining, we made a diagnosis of metastatic endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The gross anatomy and histologic features of solitary metastatic tumors can mimic those of primary tumors. A correct diagnosis should be made by combining the patient's medical history with morphologic and immunohistochemical test results.

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective study of 21 cases

OBJECTIVES

Few studies in the literature take into account the WHO's 2014 redefinition of the characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Our objective was to describe the characteristics of a group of these patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective descriptive study of patients diagnosed between 1 January 2005 and 31 May 2016 in three hospitals in Lyon, France. All the cases of cervical adenocarcinoma were reanalysed by an expert in gynaecological pathology to retain the mucinous subtypes as defined in the 2014 WHO classification. We analysed their clinical and pathological characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the 82 cases of cervical adenocarcinoma, 21 (26%) were diagnosed as mucinous. Ten were gastric type, of which four were in the extremely well differentiated form of minimal deviation adenocarcinomas, six were intestinal type, two were signet-ring cell type, and three were not otherwise specified. The patients' mean age was 42 years and 18 patients were premenopausal. The revealing symptom was metrorrhagia in eight cases (38%) and mucinous vaginal discharge in four (19%). Fifteen (72%) of the cervical smear were abnormal. Five (31%) of the 16 patients with gastric or intestinal type adenocarcinoma had a specific radiological presentation: multiple cysts of the uterine isthmus, visible on ultrasound and with T2 hyperintensity on MRI.

CONCLUSION

Mucinous adenocarcinoma is a rare form of cervical cancer that can be confused with other pathological types. It can be detected using cervical smears and should be suspected in cases of mucinous discharge and characteristic MRI features.

[Focus on mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix]

Cancer of the uterine cervix is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide, and the fourth leading cause of cancer death in women. Squamous cell carcinoma is the first type of cervical cancer (about 75% of cases), and adenocarcinoma the second. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix were redefined in the 2014 WHO classification. Endocervical adenocarcinoma, usual type, is the mose common. Mucinous adenocarcinoma were classified by this classification into different subtypes: gatric type, intestinal type and signet-ring cell type. This literature review shows the caracteristics of these various subtypes of cervical cancer, little known. These are physiopathological, clinical, cytological histological, pronostic caracteristics, and their treatments.

Diagnostic immunohistochemistry in gynaecological neoplasia: a brief survey of the most common scenarios

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable adjunct in routine gynaecological pathology. The molecular revolution has redesigned knowledge of gynaecological cancers and refined histological classification. The direct consequence has been the progressive introduction of new immunostainings for diagnostic and classification purposes. Hence, we review the routine diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry in the field of gynaecological neoplasia. We reviewed the immunomarkers useful in gynaecological pathology according to literature revision, our personal experience and research findings. We discuss the application of immunohistochemistry to reach the most accurate diagnosis in morphologically equivocal cases of gynaecological pathology and present the appropriate panel of immunomarkers in the most common scenarios of gynaecological pathology. This short review provides an updated overview of the essential immunohistochemical markers currently used in the diagnostics of gynaecological malignancies along with their molecular rationale.

Cervical Adenocarcinoma: Diagnosis of Human Papillomavirus-Positive and Human Papillomavirus-Negative Tumors

CONTEXT

- Cervical adenocarcinomas span a diverse group of tumors with several distinct histologic tumor types, which include endocervical, endometrioid, intestinal, villoglandular, gastric, signet ring, serous, clear cell, and mesonephric. Diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma, especially early diagnosis, poses a significant challenge.

OBJECTIVE

- To review the pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, immunohistochemical markers, and differential diagnosis of various subtypes of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative cervical adenocarcinomas. The paper presents a concise summary of the issues that may be particularly difficult in histopathologic diagnosis, such as differentiating neoplastic lesions from benign mimics, determining the tumor type, differentiating early invasive lesions from adenocarcinoma in situ, measuring the depth of invasion, and, finally, differentiating primary cervical adenocarcinoma from uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma and tumors metastatic from other primary sites.

DATA SOURCES

- The study employed a PubMed search of recently published reports.

CONCLUSIONS

- Early detection of HPV-positive tumor types may be aided with the expansion of HPV testing; however, early diagnosis of HPV-negative cervical adenocarcinomas will continue to pose a challenge and may require the development of additional molecular testing techniques.

The spectrum of cervical glandular neoplasia and issues in differential diagnosis

CONTEXT

Premalignant and malignant glandular lesions of the cervix are known to often cause diagnostic problems with a variety of benign (more common) as well as other malignant mimics, the latter setting often being represented by secondary involvement by endometrioid endometrial carcinoma especially in small samplings.

OBJECTIVE

To highlight key histologic features and immunohistochemical markers that may be helpful in the distinction of in situ endocervical carcinoma from benign glandular proliferations, and those that separate different subtypes of invasive endocervical carcinoma, as well as invasive carcinoma from other carcinomas secondarily involving the cervix and nonneoplastic proliferations of the cervix.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and morphologic features as well as immunohistochemistry results should be used in conjunction in the differential diagnosis of glandular proliferations of the cervix, as correct interpretation has major clinical consequences for the patient in most instances (especially benign versus malignant). Immunohistochemical markers should be used as part of a panel of antibodies, as exceptions may occur to the usual pattern of staining, and if used singly, they may mislead the pathologist to establish a wrong diagnosis.

Intestinal-type endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ: an immunophenotypically distinct subset of AIS affecting older women

Conventional endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (cAIS) is typically strongly and diffusely positive for p16 with a high Ki67 index consistent with its frequent association with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The intestinal variant (iAIS) is less common, and its relationship to HPV infection has not been thoroughly examined. This study compares the clinicopathologic features, frequency of HPV infection, and expression of CDX2 and surrogate biomarkers of HPV infection (p16, Ki67) in cAIS with those of iAIS. A total of 86 cases with a diagnosis of AIS (49 iAIS, 37 cAIS) were identified from our multi-institutional files. Of these, 13 iAIS and 20 cAIS cases had slides and tissue available for histopathologic review, immunohistochemical analysis, and molecular tests. All 86 cases were used to evaluate clinical parameters; however, HPV DNA analysis and immunohistochemical analysis for p16, MIB-1, CDX2, and p53 were performed only on those cases with available slides or paraffin blocks. The average age at diagnosis was significantly higher in iAIS compared with that in cAIS (44.5 vs. 32.6 y) (P=0.0001). All 20 cAIS cases showed moderate to strong and diffuse p16 staining; however, only 9/13 iAIS cases showed this degree of p16 staining, whereas 4/13 (31%) iAIS cases showed weak and patchy distribution (P<0.02). Only 6/9 (67%) iAIS cases were positive for either HPV type 18 (5) or 33 (1), in contrast to 11/11 conventional cAIS (P=0.04). Similarly, 12/14 cAIS, but only 5/13 iAIS, cases showed a high Ki67 proliferative index. CDX2 was positive in all iAIS cases, whereas p53 was negative. Most iAIS cases are positive for high-risk HPV and show moderate to strong and diffuse p16 staining; however, a subset of iAIS shows variable staining with p16 and Ki67, is not associated with HPV, and occurs in a distinctly older age group suggesting an alternative pathogenesis. Awareness that iAIS can show variable staining for p16 and Ki67 is important when resolving problematic endocervical lesions, particularly in small biopsies with unusual p16 staining patterns.

Demonstration of CDX2 is highly antibody dependant

OBJECTS

CDX2 is a widely used immunohistochemical marker for intestinal differentiation in neoplasms. In the Nordic Immunohistochemical Quality Control external quality assessment scheme, only 45% of the laboratories participating in the CDX2 challenge in 2009 produced sufficient staining. A major cause of insufficient staining results appeared to be less successful primary antibody (Ab) clones. To evaluate the Ab performance in a standardized way, a comparative study was carried out.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tissue microarrays containing 309 non-neoplastic tissues and tumor samples with expected high, low, and no CDX2 expression were used. Five Abs were selected for comparison: EPR2764Y concentrated (Conc), EPR2764Y in a ready-to-use format, and DAK-CDX2, AMT28, and CDX2-88, all Conc. The CDX2 stains were scored blindly using the H-score method. Tissue/tumor samples with a maximum H-score of 150 to 300 (on the basis of the staining giving the highest score) were classified as CDX2 high expressors, samples with a maximum H-score of 10 to 149 as low expressors, and samples with a maximum H-score <10 as negative.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A total of 106 tumors were CDX2 positive with at least one of the Abs. For 56 high-expressor tumors, the mean H-scores with EPR2764Y Conc, EPR2764Y ready-to-use, DAK-CDX2, AMT28, and CDX2-88 were 262, 236, 234, 167, and 149, respectively, and the percentage of positive tumors 100, 100, 100, 98, and 93, respectively. For 50 low-expressor tumors, the mean H-scores with the same Abs were 59, 26, 28, 7, and 5, respectively, and the percentage of positive tumors 98, 58, 64, 18, and 14, respectively. With EPR2764Y Conc, CDX2 was demonstrated in 5/19 (26%) urothelial carcinomas, 7/64 (11%) lung adenocarcinomas, 5/30 (17%) large cell/sarcomatoid lung carcinomas, and 4/19 (21%) esophagus squamous cell carcinomas. In-house optimized protocols gave for all 4 Conc Abs better staining results than the vendors' recommended protocols. The sensitivity of CDX2 Abs and protocols must be taken into consideration when classifying neoplasms of unknown origin.

CDX2 as a marker for intestinal differentiation: Its utility and limitations

CDX2 is a nuclear homeobox transcription factor that belongs to the caudal-related family of CDX homeobox genes. The gene encoding CDX2 is a nonclustered hexapeptide located on chromosome 13q12-13. Homeobox genes play an essential role in the control of normal embryonic development. CDX2 is crucial for axial patterning of the alimentary tract during embryonic development and is involved in the processes of intestinal cell proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, and apoptosis. It is considered specific for enterocytes and has been used for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. CDX2 expression has been reported to be organ specific and is normally expressed throughout embryonic and postnatal life within the nuclei of epithelial cells of the alimentary tract from the proximal duodenum to the distal rectum. In this review, the authors elaborate on the diagnostic utility of CDX2 in gastrointestinal tumors and other neoplasms with intestinal differentiation. Limitations with its use as the sole predictor of a gastrointestinal origin of metastatic carcinomas are also discussed.