Utility of PAX2 as a marker for diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

Lesions sub-diagnostic of endometrioid intra-epithelial neoplasia/atypical hyperplasia: value of morphology and immunohistochemistry in predicting neoplastic outcome

AIMS

Areas of gland crowding that do not fulfil diagnostic criteria of endometrioid intra-epithelial neoplasia (EIN) are often encountered in endometrial biopsies. In this study, we document the prevalence of neoplastic outcome in patients with these subdiagnostic lesions (SL) and assess the utility of morphological features and a three-marker immunohistochemistry panel (PAX2, PTEN, beta-catenin) to predict outcome.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 430 women with SL on endometrial sampling at Brigham and Women's Hospital between 2001 and 2021 with available follow-up biopsy, 72 (17%) had a neoplastic outcome (EIN or endometrioid carcinoma). Multilayered epithelium and mitoses in SL were statistically associated with a neoplastic outcome. Abnormal three-marker staining was observed in 93% (53 of 57) of SL with neoplastic outcome and 60% (37 of 62) of a control group with benign outcome. Among the 72 patients with neoplastic outcome, EIN/carcinoma tissue was available in 33; of these, 30 (91%) showed abnormal staining for one or more markers. Remarkably, in 84% of these cases the EIN/carcinoma had the aberrant expression seen in the preceding SL. Based on a prevalence of 17%, the positive and negative predictive values of abnormal staining in one or more markers were 24 and 97%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of SL warrants clinical surveillance and repeat sampling because it is followed by endometrioid neoplasia in a significant subset of patients. Normal three-marker staining identifies women with a very low risk of neoplastic outcome. Conversely, abnormal staining is frequent in SL with benign outcome leading to poor specificity and positive predictive value.

Predicting Progestin Therapy Response With PTEN, PAX2, and β-Catenin in Patients With Endometrioid Precancer

This study investigates the predictive value of biomarkers PTEN, PAX2, and β-catenin for therapeutic outcomes in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing progestin therapy. In a retrospective study of 128 patients, we analyzed a total of 351 endometrial biopsy samples and categorized outcomes into responders (absence of residual disease) and nonresponders (presence of residual disease). We found aberrant biomarker expression in pretreatment cases: 48% for PTEN, 65% for PAX2, and 36% for β-catenin. Approximately 77.3% of patients responded to progestin treatment, with nonresponders showing significantly higher initial PTEN loss (75.86% vs 39.79%, P < 0.001). Nonresponders also demonstrated significant PTEN loss (53.33% vs 20.55%, P < 0.001), PAX2 loss (57.33% vs 41.22%, P < 0.05), and β-catenin nuclear staining (53.45% vs 27.91%, P < 0.01) in follow-up samples. In addition, nonresponders exhibited lower recovery of intact PTEN and PAX2, along with higher β-catenin aberrancy in cases initially showing normal β-catenin levels. We conclude that persistent aberrant PTEN and PAX2 expression, coupled with emerging aberrant β-catenin in follow-ups, indicates a greater likelihood of treatment failure. Conversely, the absence of these aberrations suggests successful progestin therapy. Our findings highlight the utility of this 3-marker panel in assessing residual disease status and predicting progestin treatment outcomes, thus offering critical insights for patient management.

Glandular Crowdings in Endometrial Polyps: Clinical Follow-Up and Possible Worrisome Features

INTRODUCTION

Interpretation of changes and premalignant lesions in endometrial polyps can be challenging. We evaluated the clinical course of patients with focal gland crowdings in endometrial polyps via repeat biopsies and searched for possible morphological findings in the initial biopsy that may foresee a premalignant course.

METHODS

Specimens diagnosed as endometrial polyp and focal gland crowding in patients who had a repeat biopsy in a 1-year period were reexamined. Morphological findings in the initial biopsies were recorded. The group whose repeat biopsies were "premalignant or malignant" (Group 1), and the group with "benign" repeat biopsies (Group 2) were compared.

RESULTS

"Endometrial polyp and gland crowdings" was diagnosed in 115 specimens of which 38 patients had repeat biopsies. Among these 8 (21%) were diagnosed as "endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN)" (Group 1) and 30 (79%) as "benign" (Group 2). Morphological features in the initial biopsies were evaluated; PAX2 loss was 6 of 8 (75%) for Group 1 and 7 of 30 (23%) for Group 2 (P = .020), and altered epithelial cytological features were present in 5 of 8 (62%) versus 4 of 30 (13%) (P = .015), both significantly higher in Group 1. Dark intraluminal secretion, intraluminal histiocytes, intraglandular epithelial proliferation, and mean diameter of crowded gland areas were not statistically different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

"Focal gland crowdings" in endometrial polyps do carry a risk of EIN in subsequent biopsies. We suggest that the loss/decrease of PAX2 and altered epithelial cytological features in these areas in the initial biopsy are indicative of a premalignant course.

β-catenin, PAX2, and PTEN Aberrancy Across the Spectrum of Endometrioid Ovarian Lesions

Endometriosis is a common condition, with the ovary being the most common anatomic site. Endometriosis-particularly in the ovary-is associated with a risk of malignant progression, with a histologic spectrum of lesions from benign to malignant. Recently, a panel of 3 markers consisting of β-catenin, PAX2, and PTEN has been described as a potentially useful diagnostic adjunct in the diagnosis of intrauterine endometrioid neoplasia, where aberrancy for one or more of the markers is strongly associated with neoplasia. Here, we applied the panel to ovarian endometrioid lesions, including endometriosis, endometriosis with flat cytologic atypia, endometrioid borderline tumors, and endometrioid adenocarcinoma (n=85 cases in total). The incidence of aberrancy for the 3 markers increased along this putative neoplastic spectrum, arguing for a role of each of the markers in the neoplastic transformation of ovarian endometriosis. Just 1/32 (3%) of cases of nonatypical endometriosis was marker-aberrant, and this case was aberrant only for PAX2. One of 5 cases (20%) of endometriosis with atypia was marker-aberrant (both PAX2 and PTEN), supporting prior findings that some cases of flat atypia may represent bona fide precursor lesions. Of 19 endometrioid borderline tumors, 10 (53%) were aberrant for one or more markers, with PAX2 being the most frequently aberrant. Of 29 endometrioid adenocarcinomas, 28 (96.6%) were aberrant for at least 1 marker, with PAX2 again the most frequently aberrant. Patterns of aberrancy were well-preserved in areas of nonatypical endometriosis adjacent to borderline tumor or adenocarcinoma, supporting a biological origin in a common marker-aberrant precursor. The findings show that the biomarker panel could be of some diagnostic utility in the characterization of ovarian endometrioid neoplasia, such as in the diagnosis of endometrioid borderline tumor, distinguishing endometrioid from nonendometrioid lesions, or in identifying other types of early precursors at a higher risk of malignant transformation.

Utility of a PAX2, PTEN, and β-catenin Panel in the Diagnosis of Atypical Hyperplasia/Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Endometrial Polyps

The diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasm (AH/EIN) within endometrial polyps (EMPs) often poses a diagnostic conundrum. Our previous studies demonstrated that a panel of immunohistochemical (IHC) markers consisting of PAX2, PTEN, and β-catenin can be effectively utilized for the identification of AH/EIN. A total of 105 AH/EIN within EMP were analyzed using the 3-marker panel. We also evaluated these cases for the presence of morules. Benign EMP (n=90) and AH/EIN unassociated with polyp (n=111) served as controls. Aberrant expression of PAX2, PTEN, or β-catenin was observed in AH/EIN in EMP in 64.8%, 39.0%, and 61.9% of cases, respectively. At least 1 IHC marker was abnormal in 92.4% of cases. Overall, 60% of AH/EIN in EMP demonstrated abnormal results for≥2 IHC markers. The prevalence of PAX2 aberrancy was significantly lower in AH/EIN in EMP than in nonpolyp AH/EIN (64.8% vs. 81.1%, P =0.007), but higher than in benign EMP (64.8% vs. 14.4%, P <0.00001). The prevalence of β-catenin aberrancy was significantly higher in AH/EIN in EMP than in nonpolyp AH/EIN (61.9% vs. 47.7%, P =0.037). All control benign EMP demonstrated normal expression of PTEN and β-catenin. Morules were present in 38.1% of AH/EIN in EMP versus 24.3% in nonpolyp AH/EIN, and absent in benign EMP. A strong positive association was found between β-catenin and morules (Φ=0.64). Overall, 90% cases of atypical polypoid adenomyoma (n=6) and mucinous papillary proliferation (n=4) showed IHC marker aberrancy. In conclusion, the 3-marker IHC panel (PAX2, PTEN, and β-catenin) is (1) a useful tool in the diagnosis of AH/EIN in EMP; (2) PAX2 loss should be interpreted with caution and in combination with morphology and other markers.

β-catenin, Pax2, and Pten Panel Identifies Precancers Among Histologically Subdiagnostic Endometrial Lesions

Despite refinements in histologic criteria for the diagnosis of endometrioid precancers, many challenging cases are encountered in daily practice, creating diagnostic uncertainty and suboptimal patient management. Recently, an immunohistochemical 3-marker panel consisting of β-catenin, Pax2, and Pten was identified as a useful diagnostic adjunct. However, previous studies focused either on cancers or diagnostically unambiguous precancers, leaving questions about the applicability and utility of the panel in endometria with architectural features near or below the threshold of accepted histologic criteria for endometrioid precancers. Here, in a retrospective study of 90 patients, we evaluated the performance of the 3-marker panel. Notably, the panel detected a subset of disordered proliferative endometria (8/44, 18%), nonatypical hyperplasias (19/40, 48%), and cases with ambiguous features (3/6, 50%) with aberrancy for ≥1 markers. Marker-aberrant cases were more likely to progress to endometrioid precancer or cancer ( P =0.0002). Patterns of marker aberrancy in the index and progressor cases from individual patients provided evidence for origin in a common precursor, and next-generation sequencing of the progressor cases rationalized marker aberrancy for β-catenin and Pten. The results unequivocally demonstrate that some lesions that do not approach current histologic thresholds are bona fide neoplastic precursors with clinically-relevant driver events that can be detected by the 3-marker panel. The findings provide further validation for the diagnostic utility of the panel in clinical practice and its application in difficult or ambiguous cases.

Use of clinicopathological factors to predict prognosis of fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial endometrioid carcinoma and atypical hyperplasia

The incidence of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) has been gradually increasing over the past decade. Fertility-sparing therapy with progestin is a treatment option for EEC or endometrial atypical hyperplasia (AH). The present study evaluated the role of numerous prognostic factors following fertility-sparing therapy for EEC or AH. Furthermore, the present study assessed the strength of various clinicopathological indicators for the prediction of treatment efficacy. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with EEC and AH who received fertility-sparing therapy between August 2013 and September 2021 at Peking University People's Hospital (Beijing, China). Endometrial specimens were obtained from each patient after 3 months of treatment and at the end of the fertility-sparing therapy, before treatment efficacy and prognosis were evaluated using the χ² test. Furthermore, the protein expression levels of EEC biomarkers, such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), paired box 2 (PAX2), PTEN and p53 were assessed using immunohistochemistry. The overall complete response (CR) rate of fertility-sparing treatment in the EEC group was 67.39% (31/46), whereas that in the AH group was 86.49% (32/37). The difference between the CR rates in the EEC and AH groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no association between prognosis after treatment and ER, PAX2, PTEN or Ki-67 expression in the initially untreated AH or EEC groups. However, tissues with >50% positive PR expression were demonstrated to have a higher CR rate compared with those with ≤50% positive PR expression in both the EEC and AH groups. Furthermore, the PAX2-positive group tended to demonstrate higher CR rates compared with the PAX2-negative group in the patients with EEC. In conclusion, these data suggested that fertility-sparing therapy is effective for patients with EEC and AH who wish to remain fertile after treatment. Specifically, in the AH group, a higher proportion of patients achieved a CR whilst also achieving this more rapidly. Furthermore, PR was demonstrated to be a useful marker for the evaluation of EEC and AH.

Improving the Diagnosis of Endometrial Hyperplasia Using Computerized Analysis and Immunohistochemical Biomarkers

Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is a precursor lesion to endometrial carcinoma (EC). Risks for EC include genetic, hormonal and metabolic factors most notably those associated with obesity: rates are rising and there is concern that cases in pre-menopausal women may remain undetected. Making an accurate distinction between benign and pre-malignant disease is both a challenge for the pathologist and important to the gynecologist who wants to deliver the most appropriate care to meet the needs of the patient. Premalignant change may be recognized by histological changes of endometrial hyperplasia (which may occur with or without atypia) and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). In this study we created a tissue resource of EH samples diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 (n = 125) and used this to address key questions: 1. Are the EIN/WHO2014 diagnostic criteria able to consistently identify premalignant endometrium? 2. Can computer aided image analysis inform identification of EIN? 3. Can we improve diagnosis by incorporating analysis of protein expression using immunohistochemistry. Our findings confirmed the inclusion of EIN in diagnostic criteria resulted in a better agreement between expert pathologists compared with the previous WHO94 criteria used for the original diagnosis of our sample set. A computer model based on assessment of stromal:epithelial ratio appeared most accurate in classification of areas of tissue without EIN. From an extensive panel of putative endometrial protein tissue biomarkers a score based on assessment of HAND2, PTEN, and PAX2 was able to identify four clusters one of which appeared to be more likely to be benign. In summary, our study has highlighted new opportunities to improve diagnosis of pre-malignant disease in endometrium and provide a platform for further research on this important topic.

Improving the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia using computerized analysis and immunohistochemical biomarkers.. [DOI: 10.1101/2022.02.27.22271450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is a precursor lesion to endometrial carcinoma (EC). Risks for EC include genetic, hormonal and metabolic factors most notably those associated with obesity: rates are rising and there is concern that cases in pre-menopausal women may remain undetected. Making an accurate distinction between benign and pre-malignant disease is both a challenge for the pathologist and important to the gynaecologist who wants to deliver the most appropriate care to meet the needs of the patient. Premalignant change may be recognised by histological changes of endometrial hyperplasia (which may occur with or without atypia) and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN).

In this study we created a tissue resource of EH samples diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 (n=125) and used this to address key questions: 1. Are the EIN/WHO2014 diagnostic criteria able to consistently identify premalignant endometrium? 2. Can computer aided image analysis inform identification of EIN? 3. Can we improve diagnosis by incorporating analysis of protein expression using immunohistochemistry.

Our findings confirmed the inclusion of EIN in diagnostic criteria resulted in a better agreement between expert pathologists compared with the previous WHO94 criteria used for the original diagnosis of our sample set. A computer model based on assessment of stromal:epithelial ratio appeared most accurate in classification of areas of tissue without EIN. From an extensive panel of putative endometrial protein tissue biomarkers a score based on assessment of HAND2, PTEN and PAX2 was able to identify four clusters one of which appeared to be more likely to be benign.

In summary, our study has highlighted new opportunities to improve diagnosis of pre-malignant disease in endometrium and provide a platform for further research on this important topic.

Highlights

Blinded re-analysis of n=125 samples previously classified as endometrial hyperplasia found improved intra-observer agreement (67%) using EIN/WHO2014 compared with standard WHO1994 criteria (52%)

Computerised analysis of endometrial hyperplasia tissue architecture showed promise as a tool to assist pathologists in diagnosis of difficult to classify cases

A diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) using the WHO2014 criteria more accurately predicted risk of endometrial cancer than WHO1994 system.

EIN samples exhibited altered expression of ARID1A (negative glands) and HAND2 (reduced or absent from stroma)

Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis based on immunostaining for PTEN, PAX2 and HAND2 identified 4 subtypes one of which segregated with benign disease.

These results provide a framework for improved classification of pre-malignant lesions in endometrium that may inform personalized care pathways

Reliable Identification of Endometrial Precancers Through Combined Pax2, β-Catenin, and Pten Immunohistochemistry

The diagnosis of endometrial atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (AH/EIN) remains challenging and subjective in some cases, with variable histologic criteria and differences of opinion among gynecologic pathologists, potentially leading to under/overtreatment. There has been growing interest in the use of specific immunohistochemical markers as adjuncts in AH/EIN diagnosis. For example, the World Health Organization 2020 Classification specifies that loss of Pten, Pax2, or mismatch repair proteins are desirable diagnostic criteria. Other markers, most notably β-catenin and Arid1a, are also aberrantly expressed in some AH/EIN. However, the performance of some markers individually-and more importantly as a group-has not been rigorously explored, raising questions as to which marker(s) or combination(s) is the most effective in practice. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections from AH/EIN cases (n=111) were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for 6 markers: Pax2, Pten, Mlh1, β-catenin, Arid1a, and p53. Aberrant expression was tabulated for each case and marker. An additional set of normal endometria (n=79) was also analyzed to define optimal diagnostic criteria for marker aberrance. The performance characteristics of each marker, the entire panel, and subsets thereof were quantitatively and statistically analyzed. In order of number of cases detected, the most frequently aberrant markers in AH/EIN were Pax2 (81.1% of cases), Pten (50.5%), β-catenin (47.7%), Arid1a (7.2%), Mlh1 (4.5%), and p53 (2.7%). The majority of cases showed aberrant expression of ≥2 markers. All 6 markers together identified 92.8% of cases. Arid1a, Mlh1, and p53 were robust and readily scored markers, but all cases showing aberrant expression of these 3 markers were also detected by Pax2, Pten, or β-catenin. A focused panel of only 3 markers (Pax2, Pten, and β-catenin) showed optimal performance characteristics as a diagnostic adjunct in the histopathologic diagnosis of AH/EIN. Use of this panel is practicable and robust, with at least 1 of the 3 markers being aberrant in 92.8% of AH/EIN.

Chromatin topology defines estradiol-primed progesterone receptor and PAX2 binding in endometrial cancer cells

Estrogen (E2) and Progesterone (Pg), via their specific receptors (ERalpha and PR), are major determinants in the development and progression of endometrial carcinomas, However, their precise mechanism of action and the role of other transcription factors involved are not entirely clear. Using Ishikawa endometrial cancer cells, we report that E2 treatment exposes a set of progestin-dependent PR binding sites which include both E2 and progestin target genes. ChIP-seq results from hormone-treated cells revealed a non-random distribution of PAX2 binding in the vicinity of these estrogen-promoted PR sites. Altered expression of hormone regulated genes in PAX2 knockdown cells suggests a role for PAX2 in fine-tuning ERalpha and PR interplay in transcriptional regulation. Analysis of long-range interactions by Hi-C coupled with ATAC-seq data showed that these regions, that we call ‘progestin control regions’ (PgCRs), exhibited an open chromatin state even before hormone exposure and were non-randomly associated with regulated genes. Nearly 20% of genes potentially influenced by PgCRs were found to be altered during progression of endometrial cancer. Our findings suggest that endometrial response to progestins in differentiated endometrial tumor cells results in part from binding of PR together with PAX2 to accessible chromatin regions. What maintains these regions open remains to be studied.

Endometrial polyps are non-neoplastic but harbor epithelial mutations in endometrial cancer drivers at low allelic frequencies

Endometrial polyps (EMPs) are common exophytic masses associated with abnormal uterine bleeding and infertility. Unlike normal endometrium, which is cyclically shed, EMPs persist over ovulatory cycles and after the menopause. Despite their usual classification as benign entities, EMPs are paradoxically associated with endometrial carcinomas of diverse histologic subtypes, which frequently arise within EMPs. The etiology and potential origins of EMPs as clonally-derived neoplasms are uncertain, but previous investigations suggested that EMPs are neoplasms of stromal origin driven by recurring chromosomal rearrangements. To better define benign EMPs at the molecular genetic level, we analyzed individual EMPs from 31 women who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications. The 31 EMPs were subjected to comprehensive genomic profiling by exome sequencing of a large panel of tumor-related genes including oncogenes, tumor suppressors, and chromosomal translocation partners. There were no recurring chromosomal rearrangements, and copy-number analyses did not reveal evidence of significant chromosome-level events. Surprisingly, there was a high incidence of single nucleotide variants corresponding to classic oncogenic drivers (i.e., definitive cancer drivers). The spectrum of known oncogenic driver events matched that of endometrial cancers more closely than any other common cancer. Further analyses including laser-capture microdissection showed that these mutations were present in the epithelial compartment at low allelic frequencies. These results establish a link between EMPs and the acquisition of endometrial cancer driver mutations. Based on these findings, we propose a model where the association between EMPs and endometrial cancer is explained by the age-related accumulation of endometrial cancer drivers in a protected environment that-unlike normal endometrium-is not subject to cyclical shedding.

Histopathologic diagnosis of endometrial precancers: Updates and future directions

Early detection of endometrial cancer, especially its precancers, remains a critical and evolving issue in patient management and the quest to decrease mortality due to endometrial cancer. Due to many factors such as specimen fragmentation, the confounding influence of endogenous or exogenous hormones, and variable or overlapping histologic features, identification of bona fide endometrial precancers and their reliable discrimination from benign mimics remains one of the most challenging areas in diagnostic pathology. At the same time, the diagnosis of endometrial precancer, or the presence of suspicious but subdiagnostic features in an endometrial biopsy, can lead to long clinical follow-up with multiple patient visits and serial endometrial sampling, emphasizing the need for accurate diagnosis. Our understanding of endometrial precancers and their diagnosis has improved due to systematic investigations into morphologic criteria, the molecular genetics of endometrial cancer and their precursors, the validation of novel biomarkers and their use in panels, and more recent methods such digital image analysis. Although precancers for both endometrioid and non-endometrioid carcinomas will be reviewed, emphasis will be placed on the former. We review these advances and their relevance to the histopathologic diagnosis of endometrial precancers, and the recently updated 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Female Genital Tumors.

Navigating through perplex morphologic changes after exogenous hormone usage

Clinical application of exogenous hormone as a method of contraception and/or treatment of various gynecologic disorders is exceedingly common. Unfortunately, the concurrent use of these agents also complicates the interpretation of pathology specimens. Various studies have shown that morphologic changes induced by hormonal therapies are present in both non-neoplastic and neoplastic tissues within the women's reproductive tract. It is important to understand the exogenous hormone induced morphologic changes, as it helps the pathologists make the accurate diagnosis, and in turn, guide clinicians to make optimal clinical decisions. In this review, we summarize the morphologic changes in both neoplastic and non-neoplastic endometrial, cervical, and myometrial surgical specimens after hormonal therapies, particularly after progestin treatment. In the endometrium, particularly in the scenario of progestin-treated atypical endometrial hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (AEH/EIN), there is notoriously poor interobserver agreement and difficulty in assessing for the residual disease. We summarize current literature and propose our recommended approach in assessing these challenging endometrial biopsies, including a diagnostic algorism, the use of PAX-2, PTEN, beta-catenin immunohistochemistry panel, as well as consistency in diagnostic wording of the report. In the cervix, progestin makes dysplastic lesions appear metaplastic, thus high-grade squamous dysplastic lesions may be easily missed. Within the myometrium, lesions such as adenomyosis may show various degree of decidualization, while smooth muscle neoplasms may show apoplectic changes, and stromal lesions including endometrial stromal sarcoma may show more eosinophilic cytoplasm. All such changes may pose more or less diagnostic challenges in our daily practice. However, most are readily recognizable when we understand particular hormone related scenarios.

Nuclear Beta-Catenin Expression in Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia (Atypical Hyperplasia) Does Not Predict Carcinoma on Subsequent Hysterectomy

Beta-catenin (BC) mutations are associated with a high risk of recurrence in otherwise low-grade, early-stage uterine endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Recent literature suggests nuclear BC expression by immunohistochemistry is highly sensitive and specific for BC mutations. The significance of BC expression in endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN/atypical hyperplasia) and its relationship to altered differentiation patterns in EIN has yet to be fully explored. Cases meeting current diagnostic criteria for EIN based on H&E examination were obtained from 2 institutions (years 1999-2014). Patterns of altered differentiation (eg, tubal, squamous morular metaplasia, mucinous, secretory) were noted. Representative blocks were stained for BC, and expression patterns recorded. Follow-up and demographic data was obtained from the electronic medical record. Ninety-six cases were included (84 biopsies, 12 hysterectomies). BC nuclear expression was identified in 41 cases (42.7%), with 33 of 41 demonstrating foci of nonmorular BC staining. BC staining in any component of EIN was not significantly associated with the presence of carcinoma on subsequent hysterectomy (P=0.79). When restricting to nonmorular BC, the results were the same (P=0.56). Cases with tubal differentiation were significantly less likely to demonstrate nonmorular BC than cases with no specific pattern of differentiation (P<0.01). EIN frequently demonstrates BC nuclear positivity, especially in cases without tubal differentiation. BC nuclear expression in EIN does not appear to be associated with an increased likelihood of carcinoma on subsequent hysterectomy. Our results do not support routine use of BC immunohistochemistry as a prognostic biomarker in cases of EIN.

Specific Biomarker Expression Patterns in the Diagnosis of Residual and Recurrent Endometrial Precancers After Progestin Treatment: A Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND

Conservative management with progestin is a treatment option for atypical hyperplasia (AH). However, pathologic diagnosis of residual/recurrent lesions is often problematic because of the profound morphologic changes induced by progestin and the lack of established diagnostic criteria for progestin-treated residual AH.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal study of 265 endometrial biopsies from 54 patients with a history of AH on progestin therapy. Patient outcomes were divided into 3 categories after morphologic review and immunohistochemical staining with phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and paired box 2 (PAX2): (1) persistent or residual disease; (2) recurrent disease; (3) complete response. All specimens were classified into 3 categories based on morphology: (1) persistent/recurrent disease (nonresponse), (2) morphologically uncertain response, (3) optimally treated (complete response). The staining patterns of PTEN/PAX2 were tracked over time in individual patients and correlated with morphologic findings before and after progestin therapy.

RESULTS

Our data showed that aberrant expression patterns of PTEN and/or PAX2 were identified in 48 (88.9%) of the 54 primary biopsies and persisted in persistent/recurrent AH across serial endometrial biopsies (n=99, P<0.00001), while normal PTEN and PAX2 expressions were consistently observed in optimally treated cases (n=84, P<0.00001). More importantly, follow-up biopsies that showed a morphologically uncertain response but a PTEN/PAX2 expression pattern identical to the initial biopsy were significantly correlated with persistent or recurrent disease (n=18, P=0.000182), as evidenced by areas with morphologic features diagnostic of AH on subsequent biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Biomarker PTEN/PAX2 signatures offer a valuable diagnostic aid to identify residual AH in progestin-treated endometrial samples for which the biomarker status from preprogestin treated AH is known. The findings of this study are promising for a possible future change of diagnostic practice.

Role of the pathologist in assessing response to treatment of ovarian and endometrial cancers

Standardisation of pathological evaluation of tissue responses to therapy permits robust stratification of patient outcomes for management decisions and allows comparison of results across clinical trials. In gynaecological pathology there are two major areas where pathological assessment of treatment response is currently used to determine ongoing therapy. High-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) of tubo-ovarian origin frequently presents as high-stage disease and may be managed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy with debulking surgery. The chemotherapy response score (CRS) is a reproducible, validated three-tiered morphological scoring system to assess the response of HGSC to treatment. Interobserver agreement is shown to be substantial following online training, and women with CRS3 have significantly improved progression-free and overall survival. Low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia may be managed by progestogenic therapy in women who wish to preserve fertility or for whom medical co-morbidities preclude surgical management. The response to treatment is assessed histologically in successive endometrial biopsies. The histological parameters are well described, but the pathological classification of treatment response is still under development. Pathological assessment of the response to treatment is incorporated into clinical guidelines.

PI3K Pathway Effectors pAKT and FOXO1 as Novel Markers of Endometrioid Intraepithelial Neoplasia

The diagnosis of endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is challenging owing to limited sampling, hormonal status, and other confounding histologic variables. Markers such as PTEN or PAX2 can delineate EIN in some cases, but are not wholly reliable. Clearly, new markers of EIN are needed. We explored several potential markers of EIN based rationally on molecular pathways most frequently misregulated in endometrial cancer: the 3-phosphoinositide kinase (PI3K)/AKT, β-catenin, and mismatch repair pathways. We studied PTEN, PAX2, β-catenin, and MLH1, in conjunction with 2 new markers-FOXO1 and phosphorylated AKT (pAKT)-not previously investigated in EIN. Benign (n=14) and EIN (n=35) endometria were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Staining patterns were interpreted, tabulated, and scored by "clonal distinctiveness" in neoplastic lesions; that is, pattern alterations relative to normal glands. In normal endometria, FOXO1 was cytoplasmic in proliferative phase, but nuclear in secretory phase, showing that PI3K/FOXO1 participates in endometrial cycling and that FOXO1 is a readout of PI3K status. pAKT expression was low across normal endometria. FOXO1 or pAKT expression was altered in the majority of EINs (27/35, 77%), with FOXO1 and pAKT being co-altered only in some (20/35, 57%). β-catenin or MLH1 also exhibited clonal distinctiveness in EINs, showing that these are also useful markers in some cases. This is the first study to demonstrate the potential of pAKT and FOXO1 as biomarkers in the histopathologic evaluation of EIN. However, variability in expression poses challenges in interpretation.

Prognostic molecular biomarkers in endometrial cancer: A review

Background:

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the fourth most common malignancy in women worldwide and the most common gynecological cancer in developed countries. The endometrioid subtype has an excellent prognosis with conventional treatment; however, recurrence reduces overall survival.

Objective:

Describe the most relevant evidence regarding selected potential molecular biomarkers that may predict overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in EC.

Methods:

An exhaustive search was performed in PUBMED with the search terms endometrial cancer, molecular biomarker, and survival. We selected original articles written in English about endometrial cancer, molecular biomarkers, and that included survival analysis published between January 2000 and December 2016.

Results:

Several molecular prognostic biomarkers have been studied in terms of survival and therapeutic response in women with endometrial cancer; hormone receptors, microRNAs, and other molecules have emerged as potentially useful biomarkers, including HER2, p21, HE4, PTEN, p27, ANCCA, and ANXA2.

Conclusions:

The use of biomarkers in the assessment of OS, RFS, and CSS requires large trials to expand our understanding of endometrial carcinogenesis. Several molecular markers are significantly associated with a high tumor grade and advanced clinical stage in EC and, therefore, could have additive effects when combined.

Benign and Premalignant Lesions of the Endometrium

In this review, we highlight the benign and premalignant lesions of the endometrium that the pathologist may encounter in daily practice. We begin by detailing our current understanding of excess estrogen in the progression of endometrial neoplasia. We outline the currently accepted terminology to be used when evaluating proliferative endometrial lesions, while highlighting their key features. Attention is then turned to the molecular underpinnings of neoplastic progression and how this can be exploited with immunohistochemical stains when appropriate. Finally, we discuss types of metaplasia and their associations, including so-called papillary proliferations of the endometrium.

Assessing the prognostic value of PAX2 and PTEN in endometrial carcinogenesis

In order to avoid the consequences of over- and under-treatment of endometrial hyperplasia, diagnostic accuracy and progression risk assessment must be improved. The aim of this study was to assess whether PAX2 or PTEN expression could predict progression-free survival in endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and endometrial endometrioid carcinoma (EEC). Immunohistochemistry for detection of PAX2 and PTEN was performed on 348 endometrial samples; 75 proliferative endometrium (PE), 36 EIN and 237 EEC. Cases classified as PTEN null (1 or more glands negatively stained) were more prevalent in EEC than in PE and EIN (64% EEC vs 11% PE/EIN). A progressive decrease in PAX2 expression was observed from PE to EIN to EEC. Long-term clinical follow-up (6-310 months, median: 126) was available for 62 PE cases, all 36 EIN cases and 178 EEC cases. No patients with PE demonstrated progression to EIN or EEC. Progression of disease was observed in 10 (28%) EIN patients. These patients had significantly lower PAX2 expression than those that regressed (P = 0.005). Progression-free survival analysis revealed that EIN patients with a high-risk PAX2 expression score (H-score ≤75) had a higher probability of progression of disease in comparison to those with a low-risk score (H-score >75). PAX2 expression was not prognostic in EEC nor was PTEN status of prognostic value in either EIN or EEC. PAX2 expression analysis by means of H-score has prognostic potential for the identification of high-risk progression cases in EIN but needs to be validated in a larger cohort.

Diagnostic immunohistochemistry in gynaecological neoplasia: a brief survey of the most common scenarios

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable adjunct in routine gynaecological pathology. The molecular revolution has redesigned knowledge of gynaecological cancers and refined histological classification. The direct consequence has been the progressive introduction of new immunostainings for diagnostic and classification purposes. Hence, we review the routine diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry in the field of gynaecological neoplasia. We reviewed the immunomarkers useful in gynaecological pathology according to literature revision, our personal experience and research findings. We discuss the application of immunohistochemistry to reach the most accurate diagnosis in morphologically equivocal cases of gynaecological pathology and present the appropriate panel of immunomarkers in the most common scenarios of gynaecological pathology. This short review provides an updated overview of the essential immunohistochemical markers currently used in the diagnostics of gynaecological malignancies along with their molecular rationale.

New concepts for an old problem: the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Endometrial hyperplasia (EH) is a uterine pathology representing a spectrum of morphological endometrial alterations. It is predominantly characterized by an increase in the endometrial gland-to-stroma ratio when compared to normal proliferative endometrium. The clinical significance of EH lies in the associated risk of progression to endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC) and 'atypical' forms of EH are regarded as premalignant lesions. Traditional histopathological classification systems for EH exhibit wide and varying degrees of diagnostic reproducibility and, as a consequence, standardized patient management can be challenging.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

EC is the most common gynaecological malignancy in developed countries. The incidence of EC is rising, with alarming increases described in the 40-44-year-old age group. This review appraises the current EH classification systems used to stratify women at risk of malignant progression to EC. In addition, we summarize the evidence base regarding the use of immunohistochemical biomarkers for EH and discuss an emerging role for genomic analysis.

SEARCH METHODS

PubMed, Medline and the Cochrane Database were searched for original peer-reviewed primary and review articles, from January 2000 to January 2016. The following search terms were used: 'endometrial hyperplasia', 'endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia', 'atypical hyperplasia', 'complex atypical hyperplasia', 'biomarker', 'immunohistochemistry', 'progression', 'genomic', 'classification' and 'stratification'.

OUTCOMES

Recent changes to EH classification reflect our current understanding of the genesis of endometrioid ECs. The concept of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) as a mutationally activated, monoclonal pre-malignancy represents a fundamental shift from the previously held notion that unopposed oestrogenic stimulation causes ever-increasing hyperplastic proliferation, with accumulating cytological atypia that imperceptibly leads to the development of endometrioid EC. Our review highlights several key biomarker candidates that have been described as both diagnostic tools for EH and markers of progression to EC. We propose that, moving forwards, a 'panel' approach of combinations of the immunohistochemical biomarkers described in this review may be more informative since no single candidate can currently fill the entire role.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

EC has historically been considered a predominantly postmenopausal disease. Owing in part to the current unprecedented rates of obesity, we are starting to see signs of a shift towards a rising incidence of EC amongst pre- and peri-menopausal woman. This creates unique challenges both diagnostically and therapeutically. Furthering our understanding of the premalignant stages of EC development will allow us to pursue earlier diagnosis and facilitate appropriate stratification of women at risk of developing EC, permitting timely and appropriate therapeutic interventions.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.

The Utility of Immunohistochemistry in the Differential Diagnosis of Gynecologic Disorders

Context

Immunohistochemistry has assumed an increasing role in the identification and characterization of gynecologic disorders including lesions with deceptively bland morphology, uncommon and underdiagnosed neoplasms, and neoplasms with specific genetic alterations associated with overexpression or loss of expression of specific proteins. The diagnostic accuracy has been significantly improved owing to the discovery and increasing experience with the tumor-associated biomarkers, and the increasing demand for precise tumor classification to assess suitability for the expanding therapeutic modalities including clinical trials.

Objective

To differentiate lesions of the gynecologic tract through the use of effective immunohistochemical panels.

Data Sources

Literature review and authors' personal practice experience.

Conclusions

The application of diagnostic and prognostic immunohistochemical panels has enabled pathologists to better guide therapeutic decisions and to better predict the clinical outcome. It is now well established that the use of ancillary testing, including immunohistochemistry, has a significant power in the identification, differentiation, and classification of reactive, premalignant, and malignant gynecologic disorders. This article discusses the utilities and pitfalls of the commonly used immunohistochemical markers in the context of overlapping morphologic features encountered in the uterus, ovaries, and fallopian tubes.

Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia

CONTEXT

Developed in conjunction with molecular and progression data, the sequence classification schema for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN)/benign hyperplasia (BH) provides an easy to adopt and reproducible method for classification of endometrial biopsies.

OBJECTIVE

To review current data supporting the use of BH/EIN to classify endometrial biopsies, and to discuss the hormone-driven endometrial sequence from anovulation/disordered proliferative endometrium through BH and EIN and their diagnostic difficulty.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive review of EIN literature based on literature indexed by PubMed (National Library of Medicine) and Google Scholar.

CONCLUSIONS

The BH/EIN schema is gaining wider acceptance among pathologist and clinicians. The research leading to the EIN criteria is based on molecular and progression data. The BH/EIN schema has better reproducibility among pathologists, is intuitively easy to use, and requires understanding of endometrial physiology and neoplasia.