Molecular testing in lung carcinoma: Quo vadis?

Analysis of immunohistochemical stain usage in different pathology practice settings

This study compares the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for diagnosing carcinoma in private practice and commercial settings with use in a single academic center. H&E-stained slides and IHC stains, when present, of recently diagnosed carcinomas (n = 200) from patients referred to our institution for treatment were reviewed by a resident and mid-and senior-level pathologists. Diagnostic agreement between academic and referral pathologists was 98%; the former group used IHC stains in 11% and the latter in 26% of cases (P < .0001). Pathologists from commercial laboratories (12% of referrals) used IHC in 38% of cases, whereas private/hospital-based community laboratories (86% of referrals) used them in 24%. The average number of stains ordered per case was similar among all groups. We suggest that the use of IHC may reflect both the degree of experience of the pathologist and the pathology practice setting.

Evidence-Based Principles in Pathology: Existing Problem Areas and the Development of “Quality” Practice Patterns

Context.—Contrary to the intuitive impressions of many pathologists, several areas exist in laboratory medicine where evidence-based medicine (EBM) principles are not applied. These include aspects of both anatomic and clinical pathology. Some non-EBM practices are perpetuated by clinical “consumers” of laboratory services because of inadequate education, habit, or overreliance on empirical factors. Other faulty procedures are driven by pathologists themselves.

Objectives.—To consider (1) several selected problem areas representing non-EBM practices in laboratory medicine; such examples include ideas and techniques that concern metastatic malignancies, “targeted” oncologic therapy, general laboratory testing and data utilization, evaluation of selected coagulation defects, administration of blood products, and analysis of hepatic iron-overload syndromes; and (2) EBM principles as methods for remediation of deficiencies in hospital pathology, and implements for the construction of “quality” practices in our specialty.

Data Sources.—Current English literature relating to evidence-based principles in pathology and laboratory medicine, as well as the authors' experience.

Conclusions.—Evidence-based medicine holds the promise of optimizing laboratory services to produce “quality” practices in pathology. It will also be a key to restraining the overall cost of health care.