Usefulness of diagnostic qualifiers for thyroid fine-needle aspirations with atypia of undetermined significance

Consistency in the Distribution of Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology Categories Over 9 Years: A Single Institute, Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) has evolved since it was first introduced in 2009 to become a worldwide accepted cytologic analysis reference, due to its simplicity and reproducibility. To date, the consistency of BSRTC throughout time has yet to be investigated.

METHODS

Retrospective single institution case series with chart review of all patients who underwent fine-needle aspirations for a thyroid nodule in our institution between the years 2010 and 2018 with a documented BSRTC classification. Data collection included demographics, risk factors, sonographic evaluation, nodule size, and final pathology when feasible. The main outcome is the difference in the rates of BSRTC categories benign, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), follicular neoplasm, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant (BSRTC II-VI, respectively) between the study years.

RESULTS

A total of 2830 thyroid nodules were included. BSRTC II-VI distribution was 83.9% (2373), 8.2%, (232), 2.7% (75), 3.3% (93), and 2.0% (57), respectively. There was no significant change in the overall trend of each BSRTC category distribution throughout the study. There was a significant increase in the benign cytology rate (BSRTC II) in 2011 compared to 2015 and 2018 (76.4% compared to 88.7% and 87.6%, respectively. P < .005) alongside a significant decline in the AUS category rate (BSRTC III) between the same years (13.0% compared to 4.8% and 5.5%, respectively. P < .005).

CONCLUSION

BSRTC showed consistency throughout the study across all observed categories. An overlap between AUS and benign may exist, possibly due to the heterogenic definition of AUS as reflected in the 2023 BSRTC subclassification for AUS.

A Comprehensive Approach to the Thyroid Bethesda Category III (AUS) in the Transition Zone Between 2nd Edition and 3rd Edition of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: Subcategorization, Nuclear Scoring, and More

Significant interobserver variabilities exist for Bethesda category III: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). Thus, subcategorization of AUS including AUS "nuclear" and AUS "other" is proposed in the recent 3rd edition of TBSRTC. This study investigated the impact of the nuclear features/architectural features/nuclear score (NS) (3-tiered)/subcategories and subgroups on risk of malignancy (ROM) in thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNA). 6940 FNAs were evaluated. 1224 (17.6%) cases diagnosed as AUS were reviewed, and 240 patients (initial FNAs of 260 nodules and 240 thyroidectomies) were included. Subcategories and subgroups were defined according to TBSRTC 2nd and 3rd editions. Histological diagnostic groups included nonneoplastic disease, benign neoplasm, low-risk neoplasm, and malignant neoplasm. Overall, ROM was 30.7%. ROM was significantly higher in FNAs with nuclear overlapping (35.5%), nuclear molding (56.9%), irregular contours (42.1%), nuclear grooves (74.1%), chromatin clearing (49.4%), and chromatin margination (57.7%), and these features were independent significant predictors for malignancy. FNAs with NS3 had significantly higher ROM (64.2%). Three-dimensional groups were significantly more frequent in malignant neoplasms (35.7%). ROM was significantly higher in AUS-nuclear subcategory (48.2%) and in AUS-nuclear and architectural subcategory (38.3%). The highest ROM was detected in AUS-nuclear1 subgroup (65.2%). ROM was significantly higher in the group including AUS-nuclear and AUS-nuclear and architectural subcategories, namely "high-risk group" than the group including other subcategories, namely "low-risk group" (42.0%vs 13.9%). In conclusion, subcategorization may not be the end point, and nuclear scoring and evaluation of architectural patterns according to strict criteria may provide data for remodeling of TBSRTC categories.

Evolving approaches in paediatric thyroid cytopathology: A review

The guidelines for the workup of thyroid nodules have been established in adult populations and secondarily applied to paediatric populations. In particular, The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) is commonly applied to both adult and paediatric thyroid nodules. However, as paediatric nodules have distinct molecular drivers and behavioural trajectories, there is renewed interest in diagnostic and management strategies that are paediatric specific. Here, we review key differences between paediatric and adult thyroid cancer and recent literature evaluating the use of TBSRTC in paediatric populations.

The 2023 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology

Since the publication of the first edition in 2010, The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has allowed cytopathologists to use a standardized, category-based reporting system for thyroid fine needle aspirations. The third edition builds on the success of the 2 earlier editions and offers several key updates. The most important is the assignment of a single name for each of the 6 diagnostic categories: (i) nondiagnostic; (ii) benign; (iii) atypia of undetermined significance; (iv) follicular neoplasm; (v) suspicious for malignancy; and (vi) malignant. Each of the categories has an implied risk of malignancy (ROM), which has been updated and refined based on data reported after the second edition. The third edition offers an average ROM for each category, in addition to the expected range of cancer risk. The atypia of undetermined significance subcategorization is simplified into 2 subgroups based on the implied ROM and molecular profiling. A discussion of pediatric thyroid disease has been added, and pediatric ROMs and management algorithms are discussed in the relevant sections. Nomenclature has been updated to align with the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Thyroid Neoplasms. Two new chapters have been added: one that addresses the significant and expanded use of molecular and ancillary testing in thyroid cytopathology, and another that summarizes clinical perspectives and imaging findings in thyroid disease.

The 2023 Bethesda System for reporting thyroid cytopathology

Since the publication of the first edition in 2010, The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has allowed cytopathologists to use a standardized, category-based reporting system for thyroid fine needle aspirations. The third edition builds on the success of the 2 earlier editions and offers several key updates. The most important is the assignment of a single name for each of the 6 diagnostic categories: (i) nondiagnostic; (ii) benign; (iii) atypia of undetermined significance; (iv) follicular neoplasm; (v) suspicious for malignancy; and (vi) malignant. Each of the categories has an implied risk of malignancy (ROM), which has been updated and refined based on data reported after the second edition. The third edition offers an average ROM for each category, in addition to the expected range of cancer risk. The atypia of undetermined significance subcategorization is simplified into 2 subgroups based on the implied ROM and molecular profiling. A discussion of pediatric thyroid disease has been added, and pediatric ROMs and management algorithms are discussed in the relevant sections. Nomenclature has been updated to align with the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Thyroid Neoplasms. Two new chapters have been added: one that addresses the significant and expanded use of molecular and ancillary testing in thyroid cytopathology, and another that summarizes clinical perspectives and imaging findings in thyroid disease.

A Triumvirate:: Correlating Thyroid Cytopathology, Molecular Testing, and Histopathology

Risk stratification is essential in the preoperative evaluation and management of thyroid nodules, most of which are benign. Advances in DNA and RNA sequencing have shed light on the molecular drivers of thyroid cancer. Molecular testing of cytologically indeterminate nodules has helped refine risk stratification, triage patients for surgery, and determine the extent of surgery. Molecular platforms with high negative predictive values can help identify nodules that may be spared surgery and can be managed conservatively. Here we discuss the importance of integrating cytomorphologic, molecular, and histologic features to help avoid errors and improve patient management.

The influence of papillary features on the risk of malignancy in thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to the assess the risk of malignancy in thyroid lesions that were diagnosed as AUS/FLUS when using a novel cytology subclassification system that is based on the presence or absence of papillary features.

METHODS

AUS/FLUS case cytology was re-reviewed and subclassified into minor or major concern groups based upon the absence or presence of papillary features, respectively. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated and compared between the two groups. Inter-pathologist agreement in case subclassification was also measured.

RESULTS

The minor concern group had a 12.6% associated ROM, while the major concern group had a significantly higher ROM (58.4%), (P < 0.001). Based on 108 cases, the inter-pathologist agreement in case subclassification was 79%, and the κ value was 0.47.

CONCLUSIONS

The identification of papillary features significantly increases the ROM in thyroid lesions with an AUS/FLUS diagnosis.

Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier and histopathological outcome are associated with patterns of atypia in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

Data on Afirma's genomic sequencing classifier (GSC) performance in atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) subcategories is limited. This study investigated GSC performance in AUS nodules with architectural atypia (AUS-A), cytological atypia (AUS-C), architectural and cytological atypia (AUS-AC), and predominantly Hürthle cells (AUS-HC).

METHODS

This study retrieved consecutive thyroid nodules having a recurrent cytologic diagnosis of AUS with qualifiers and a concurrent GSC diagnostic result. All nodules were followed by either surgical intervention or clinical and/or ultrasound monitoring (≥6 months). GSC benign call rate (BCR), rate of histology-proven malignancy, and diagnostic parameters of GSC were calculated for individual AUS subcategories. Statistical analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

A total of 135 AUS nodules fulfilled inclusion criteria, including 79 AUS-A, 9 AUS-C, 29 AUS-AC, and 18 AUS-HC. BCR was 72.2%, 66.7%, 44.8%, and 77.8% in AUS-A, AUS-C, AUS-AC, and AUS-HC, respectively. AUS-A showed a greater BCR than AUS-AC (p &lt; .05). All GSC-benign nodules were considered benign on clinical or surgical follow-up. Among GSC-suspicious nodules, histology-proven malignancies represented 4.5% of AUS-A, 0% of AUS-C, 56.3% of AUS-AC, and 25.0% of AUS-HC cases. AUS-AC demonstrated a higher malignant rate compared with AUS-A (p &lt; .05). GSC offers 100% NPV and a wide range (5%-56%) of PPV across all AUS subcategories. AUS-AC demonstrated a greater PPV compared with AUS-A (p &lt; .05).

CONCLUSION

BCR of GSC and malignant rates associated with suspicious GSC may differ in various AUS subcategories. GSC-suspicious nodules with both architectural and cytologic atypia are more likely to be malignant. These findings may improve clinical triage and/or management of patients with AUS thyroid nodules.

Probability of malignancy as determined by ThyroSeq v3 genomic classifier varies according to the subtype of atypia

BACKGROUND

ThyroSeq assesses the probability of malignancy (POM) in thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS). The authors investigated whether defined AUS subcategories are associated with specific molecular alterations, the molecular-derived risk of malignancy (MDROM), and the risk of malignancy (ROM).

METHODS

Fine-needle aspiration cytology reports of AUS and corresponding results from the ThyroSeq version 3 genomic classifier results were retrieved and subcategorized as follicular cells with either cytologic atypia (FC-C), architectural atypia (FC-A), both cytologic and architectural atypia (FC-CA), or a predominance of Hurthle cells (PHC). The MDROM, ROM, and frequency of molecular alterations by subcategory were computed and analyzed, and p < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 541 cases subdivided into 233 with FC-A, 104 with FC-C, 116 with FC-CA, and 88 with PHC. The benign call rate and positive call rate for the AUS category were 72% and 28%, respectively, which varied between AUS subcategories. The MDROM by subcategory was 15.9% FC-A, 20.5% FC-C, 33.8% FC-CA, and 14.4% PHC. Histologic follow-up was available for 155 (28%) AUS cases with a follow-up period ≥12 months. The 95% confidence intervals of the MDROMs overlapped with the ROMs. The highest MDROM and ROM were in the FC-CA subcategory. RAS mutations were present in all subcategories. BRAF V600E mutations and papillary thyroid carcinoma were most frequent in the FC-CA subcategory. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features was significantly more frequent in the FC-C subcategory.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results demonstrated that AUS subcategories are associated with specific genetic alterations, the MDROM, and the ROM. Molecular results and an awareness of various cancer probabilities within AUS subcategories can allow for a more tailored management.

Approach to Bethesda system category III thyroid nodules according to US-risk stratification

This study evaluated how to manage Bethesda category III (Bethesda III) (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance [AUS/FLUS]) thyroid nodules according to the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) to reduce unnecessary surgeries. A total of 161 thyroid nodules diagnosed as Bethesda III underwent surgery from 2016 to 2019. Ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) or core needle biopsy (CNB) was used for repeat examination. K-TIRADS category was assigned to the thyroid nodules. The proportion of malignancy in Bethesda III nodules confirmed by surgery were significantly increased in proportion relative to K-TIRADS with 60.0% low suspicion, 88.2% intermediate suspicion, and 100% high suspicion nodules (p < 0.001). The proportion of malignancy in AUS and FLUS were significantly different (94.2% vs. 40.0% p = 0.003). The proportion of malignancy in AUS increased with K-TIRADS categories, but there was no difference in FLUS. All K-TIRADS high suspicion nodules were AUS as papillary carcinomas (99%), while 80% of FLUS nodules and 50% of follicular carcinomas showed K-TIRADS low suspicion. In 116 nodules with repeat FNA or CNB after initial Bethesda III results, the conclusive result rate was significantly increased in proportion to K-TIRADS with 58.3% low suspicion, 83.3% intermediate suspicion, and 88.8% high suspicion nodules (p = 0.015). K-TIRADS low suspicion nodules of Bethesda III nodules should be managed after risk-benefit consideration rather than immediate surgery or repeat examination. K-TIRADS for Bethesda III nodules can predict papillary carcinoma well, but not follicular carcinoma.

Rate of malignancy for thyroid nodules with AUS/FLUS cytopathology in a tertiary care center - a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Thyroid nodules are stratified through fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and are often categorized using The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, which estimates the risk of malignancy for six cytopathological categories. The atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) categories have varying malignancy rates reported in the literature which can range from 6 to 72.9%. Due to this heterogeneity, we assessed the malignancy rate and effectiveness of repeat FNA (rFNA) for AUS/FLUS thyroid cytopathology at our institution.

METHODS

Electronic health records of patients with AUS/FLUS thyroid cytopathology on FNA at our center since the implementation of the Bethesda System on May 1, 2014-December 31, 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, treatment pathway, and pathology results were collected. The treatment pathway of the nodules, the rFNA results, and the malignant histopathology results were reported. Malignancy rates were calculated as an upper and lower limit estimate.

RESULTS

This study described 182 AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules from 177 patients. In total, 24 thyroid nodules were deemed malignant upon histopathology, yielding a final malignancy rate of 13.2-25.3%. All of the malignancies were variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma. The malignancy rate of the nodules which underwent resection without rFNA (21.5%) was lower than the malignancy rate of the nodules which underwent resection after rFNA (43.8%). 45.5% of the rFNA results were re-classified into more definitive categories.

CONCLUSION

The malignancy rate of AUS/FLUS thyroid cytopathology at our center is in line with the risk of malignancy stated by the 2017 Bethesda System. However, our malignancy rate is lower than some other Canadian centers and approximately half of our rFNAs were re-classified, highlighting the importance of establishing center-specific malignancy and rFNA re-classification rates to guide treatment decisions.

Reporting Thyroid Cytology in a Globalized World

The Italian SIAPEC-AIT 2014 classification, the 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC), the 2016 UK Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) thyroid reporting system, and the 2019 Japanese reporting system for thyroid aspiration cytology (JRSTAC2019) represent the most widely used reporting systems among clinicians and pathologists for the purpose of cytologically diagnosing, estimating the potential risk of malignancy (ROM), and defining the most appropriate treatment for a patient with a thyroid nodule. Although all the systems use overlapping diagnostic categories and morphologic criteria, they differ on the basis of the criteria for inclusion in the cytologic categories, which may, in turn, affect the ROM of a given category and the clinical management of the patient, particularly with regard to the “indeterminate” categories. The aim of this review is to analyze the main differences that emerge between the systems and to propose possible solutions for a comprehensive reporting system that integrates and harmonizes all the criteria of the Italian classification and the Bethesda system, also taking into account the impact that the new tumor entity NIFTP (non-invasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features) that has, in many instances, replaced the non-invasive form of the follicular variant of papillary carcinoma, has had on the modification of malignancy risks.

The evolution of "atypia" in thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) provided a standardized framework for resulting thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens and introduced the low-risk category of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS). This indeterminate category has significantly evolved over time with the incorporation of molecular testing, reclassification of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP), and a shift toward more conservative management. Despite these refinements, AUS/FLUS remains a challenge, at both the diagnostic and therapeutic level. We review the criteria for AUS/FLUS and the associated controversies in rendering this diagnosis, while highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to managing atypical thyroid nodules.

Atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid cytology: Nuclear atypia and architectural atypia are associated with different molecular alterations and risks of malignancy

BACKGROUND

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology contains an atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) category with heterogeneous and distinct inclusion criteria. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in malignancy rates and molecular alterations based on the presence of different criteria.

METHODS

A laboratory information search was conducted to identify thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens signed out as AUS. The cases were reclassified as architectural atypia (3A), cytologic atypia (3C), both architectural and cytologic atypia (3B), or Hürthle cell aspirate (3H). Surgical follow-up and concurrent molecular test results, if available, were collected.

RESULTS

Five hundred ten specimens, including 258 reclassified as 3A, 40 reclassified as 3B, 119 reclassified as 3C, and 86 reclassified as 3H, were identified. The risks of malignancy for the subcategories were 13.4%, 26.3%, 44.1%, and 13.8%, respectively. Additionally, BRAF V600E mutations were more prevalent in specimens with cytologic atypia (3B/3C), whereas low-risk alterations, including KRAS, PTEN, and PAX8-PPARy2, were more prevalent in those with architectural atypia (3A).

CONCLUSIONS

Subdividing AUS specimens on the basis of the type of atypia can yield categories associated with distinct molecular alterations and risks of malignancy.

Hürthle cell lesions of the thyroid: Progress made and challenges remaining

Hürthle cell-predominant thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNA) are encountered frequently in routine practice, yet they are often challenging to diagnose accurately and are associated with significant interobserver variability. This is largely due to the ubiquity of Hürthle cells in thyroid pathology, ranging from nonneoplastic conditions to aggressive malignancies. Although limitations in cytomorphologic diagnoses likely will remain for the foreseeable future, our knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of Hürthle cell neoplasia and application of molecular testing to cytologic material have increased dramatically within the past decade. This review provides context behind the challenges in diagnosis of Hürthle cell lesions and summarizes the more recent advances in diagnostic tools.

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: Asian vs. non-Asian practice, and the Singapore experience

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has paved the way for comparisons of the practice of thyroid cytology in many different regions. However, there have been comparatively few studies documenting differences between Asian and non-Asian practice. Here, we aim to compare a few key parameters between the two regions, focusing on the indeterminate category of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS). We compared its incidence, resection rates (RRs), risk of malignancy (ROM), rate of repeat fine needle aspiration (rFNA), ROMs of cytomorphologic subcategories of nuclear atypia (AUS-N) vs. architectural atypia (AUS-A), and, finally, the incidence of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) vs. follicular neoplasms (FNs) in resected AUS/FLUS cases in Asian and non-Asian regions. Where possible, these metrics were compared with the Singapore experience from a tertiary referral institution. While the incidence of AUS/FLUS was similar in both regions, we found geographical differences in the RRs and ROMs, which may reflect a higher collective threshold for surgery in Asian countries. However, both cohorts showed higher ROMs in the AUS-N subcategory as compared to the AUS-A subcategory, supporting the subclassification of the AUS/FLUS based on the presence of nuclear atypia. We also observed a higher incidence of AUS-N coupled with a higher incidence of PTC in resected AUS/FLUS nodules in Asian cohorts, while AUS-A and follicular-patterned neoplasms featured more prominently in the non-Asian cohorts. These incidences may account for the starkly different molecular approaches that we noted-in Asian (chiefly Korean and Chinese) centers, BRAF mutational analysis was favored, while gene panels and gene expression classifiers were more frequently applied in non-Asian centers (chiefly in the United States of America). Overall, the data from Singapore appears more closely aligned to non-Asian trends, despite its geographical location in Southeast Asia and its predominantly Asian population. We conclude that there is significant heterogeneity in the outcomes of the AUS/FLUS categories between and within regions, which is only partially explained by regional variations, and may also reflect different regional diagnostic and management practices. This highlights the importance of understanding the local context in the interpretation of indeterminate Bethesda categories, rather than adopting a "one-size fits all" approach.

An institutional experience: A retrospective analysis of the effect of transitioning from follicular lesion of undetermined significance to atypia of undetermined significance with subclassified atypia on interobserver concordance, rates of neoplasia, and rates of malignancy

INTRODUCTION

The rate of malignancy (ROM) in thyroid fine needle aspirations (FNA) classified under "atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), including Hürthle cell type (HLUS)" category of The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) in literature is highly variable. The 2018 TBSRTC was updated to note a preferred categorization of AUS cases into subcategories. This study evaluates the impact of AUS subclassification on rates of neoplasia (RON), rates of malignancy (ROM), and cytopathologist (CP) concordance.

METHODS

93 thyroid FNAs previously diagnosed as FLUS or HLUS from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014 with subsequent surgical resection were identified. Four CPs reclassified these cases using TBSRTC AUS subcategories of follicular cells with architectural and/or cytologic atypia, predominantly Hürthle cells, and atypical lymphocytes. RON and ROM were calculated for each diagnostic subcategory for each CP.

RESULTS

The original RON and ROM for FLUS cases were 31.4% and 15.1% and were 77.8% and 22.2% for HLUS cases. 10.8% of cases showed diagnostic concordance amongst the four CPs. The most frequently utilized subcategory was architectural atypia. RON ranges for architectural atypia, cytologic atypia, architectural and cytologic atypia, and predominantly Hürthle cells were 28.1% to 35.7%, 0% to 33.3%, 35.3% to 66.7%, and 57.1% to 87.5%. The range of ROM was 13.9% to 16.7%, 0% to 33%, 0% to 42.9%, and 0% to 25%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

RON for AUS predominantly Hürthle cells subcategory was higher than previously reported, which may indicate use for tailored patient management pathways. AUS subclassification can result in significant interobserver variability. Therefore, institutions may consider consensus/quality control sessions to optimize diagnostic concordance.

Are Bethesda III Thyroid Nodules More Aggressive than Bethesda IV Thyroid Nodules When Found to Be Malignant?

The Bethesda classification system for thyroid fine needle aspirate (FNA) is used to predict the risk of malignancy and to guide the management of thyroid nodules. We postulated that thyroid malignancies characterized as Bethesda III on FNA have more aggressive features than those classified as Bethesda IV. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify those who underwent thyroid surgery at a single tertiary hospital setting between 2015 and 2020. Associations between Bethesda category, molecular genetic test results, and histopathologic findings were examined. Out of 628 surgeries that were performed, 199 (54.2%) Bethesda III nodules and 216 (82.8%) Bethesda IV nodules were malignant. Of those that were malignant, 37 (18.6%) and 22 (10.2%) Bethesda III and Bethesda IV nodules showed aggressive features, respectively (p value = 0.014). There was a proportionally increased number of aggressive features in extra-thyroidal extension, lymph nodes metastasis, and all aggressive subtypes of papillary thyroid cancer in the Bethesda III category. Although Bethesda IV nodules are much more likely to be malignant (p value = 0.002), our study suggests that Bethesda III nodules that are resected are more likely to have aggressive features than Bethesda IV nodules, with a statistically significant increase in the solid variant of papillary thyroid cancer and lymph node metastasis.

Pitfalls in Thyroid Cytopathology

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is among the first diagnostic tools used in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. It has the ability to triage patients with benign and malignant lesions, thus defining the optimum clinical and/or surgical management. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has found worldwide acceptance. Thyroid FNA offers high positive predictive value (97%-99%), with sensitivities and specificities of 65% to 99% and 72% to 100%, respectively. Nonetheless, many potential diagnostic pitfalls exist that can lead to false-positive and/or false-negative results. This article discusses several of the potential pitfalls in the cytologic evaluation of thyroid lesions.

Differential outcomes of patients with thyroid FNA diagnoses of AUS/FLUS with and without nuclear atypia: The potential need for separation in the Bethesda System

BACKGROUND

In the current version of The Bethesda System (TBS) for thyroid cytopathology, the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) category has an estimated risk of malignancy of 10% to 30%. Diagnostic criteria include presence of nuclear atypia, suggestive of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), as well as other types of atypia, which can be seen with non-malignant entities. Aim of this study was to investigate differential outcomes of AUS/FLUS, based on specific morphologic criteria, and assess their respective malignancy risks.

METHODS

From a total of 1233 patients undergoing thyroid FNAs between 2010 and 2014 at the University of Washington, 119 had AUS/FLUS without nuclear atypia, and 64 with nuclear atypia. Outcomes for patients with and without nuclear atypia (with the exception of 24 patients lost to follow-up) were evaluated and results were compared.

RESULTS

16/57 (28.1%) patients with AUS/FLUS and nuclear atypia subsequently had carcinomas on thyroidectomy, statistically higher than the 8/102 patients (7.8%, P = .001) without nuclear atypia. When comparing only patients who underwent surgery (n = 63), again those with AUS/FLUS and nuclear atypia had statistically higher rates of carcinoma (16/31, 51.6%), compared to those without (8/32, 25%; P = .0394). Overall, 24/159 (15.1%) of patients with AUS/FLUS had carcinoma on subsequent histology.

CONCLUSION

Malignancy rates for AUS/FLUS were in line with TBS estimated risks. However, our data demonstrate that the presence or absence of nuclear atypia is associated with different malignancy rates, suggesting the possibility that the AUS/FLUS category may best be split into two subcategories with different implied risks of malignancy.

Risk of malignancy in Thyroid "Atypia of undetermined significance/Follicular lesion of undetermined significance" and its subcategories - A 5-year experience

Context

Atypia of undetermined significance/Follicular lesion of undetermined significance [AUS/FLUS] is a heterogeneous category with a wide range of risk of malignancy [ROM] reported in the literature. The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology [TBSRTC], 2017 has recommended subcategorization of AUS/FLUS.

Aims

To evaluate the ROM in thyroid nodules categorized as AUS/FLUS, as well as separate ROM for each of the five subcategories.

Settings and Design

Retrospective analytic study.

Methods and Materials

A retrospective audit was conducted for all thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) from January 2013 to December 2017. Slides for cases with follow-up histopathology were reviewed, classified into the five recommended subcategories, and differential ROM was calculated.

Statistical Analysis Used

z test for comparison of proportions was done to evaluate the difference in ROM among different subcategories of AUS/FLUS. The P value of less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results

Total number of thyroid FNACs reported was 1,630, of which 122 were AUS/FLUS (7.5%). Histopathology was available in 49 cases, out of which 18 were malignant (ROM = 36.7%). The risk of malignancy (ROM) for nodules with architectural and cytologic atypia was higher (43.8%) than ROM for nodules with only architectural atypia (16.7%).

Conclusions

The sub-classification of AUS/FLUS into subcategories as recommended by TBSRTC, 2017 may better stratify the malignancy risk and guide future management guidelines.

Subcategorisation of AUS/FLUS thyroid lesions as per the 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a retrospective study from a tertiary care centre analysing risk of malignancy (ROM) of the different subcategories

Aims

The 2017 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) recommends subclassification of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) into six subcategories. The present study evaluates the risk of malignancy (ROM) and risk of neoplasm (RON) among these.

Methods

All thyroid aspirates reported as AUS/FLUS over a 4.5-year period, with available histology, were reviewed and subclassified as per TBSRTC. ROM and RON were calculated and compared.

Results

Of 2554 thyroid aspirates, 281 (11.0%) were AUS/FLUS. Eighty-one with available histology were evaluated. ROM was 51.8%. Cytologic and architectural atypia (AUS-C&A) was the most prevalent (62.9%), followed by Hürthle cell type (19.6%), AUS-A (11.1%), AUS-not otherwise specified (NOS) (7.4%), cytologic atypia (AUS-C) (4.9%) and atypical lymphoid cells (1.2%). Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and adenomatous goitre (AG) were the most common histological diagnoses (27% each). On histology, AUS-C had 2/4 PTC and 2/4 AG on histology. AUS-A had 4/9 follicular neoplasm (FN) and 2/9 non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) while AUS C&A had 18/51 PTC, 13/51 AG, 11/51 NIFTP and 5/51 FN. ROM and RON were similar across subcategories, ROM was the highest for AUS-C&A (58.8%), AUS-C (50%) and AUS-NOS (50%). NIFTP reclassification as non-malignant reduced ROM to 35.8% (absolute reduction of 16% and a relative decrease of 31%) with the greatest relative decrease seen in AUS-A (50%), followed by AUS-C&A (37%), and none in others.

Conclusions

AUS/FLUS subcategorisation helped to indicate risk for the more likely neoplasm, whether PTC or FN. ROM was the highest for cases with cytological atypia but did not differ significantly across different subcategories. NIFTP changed the ROM of AUS-A and AUS-C&A, since both NIFTP and FN have microfollicles.

Ultrasound characteristics of thyroid nodules facilitate interpretation of the malignant risk of Bethesda system III/IV thyroid nodules and inform therapeutic schedule

Background

This study was designed to explore whether ultrasound of thyroid nodules facilitates the interpretation of the malignant risk of Bethesda III/IV thyroid nodules to inform further therapies.

Methods

We reviewed patient records in which the results of ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration (US‐FNA) were classified by the Bethesda III/IV in our institution between January 2016 and June 2018. Studies were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Science, Science Direct, Wiley Online Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and Chinese VIP. The odds ratio (OR) was used to measure associations between risk factors and thyroid nodule malignancy.

Results

Fifty‐nine cases of Bethesda III/IV with corresponding surgeries were included, and the malignancy risk was 54.2%. Meta‐analysis revealed irregular borders, solitary nodules, hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, and being taller than wide, all of which increased the malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. Combined ORs for these factors were 4.08 (95% CI: 2.34‐7.14, P < .001), 2.18 (95% CI: 1.39‐3.42, P = .001), 2.02 (95% CI: 1.35‐3.01, P = .001), 3.21 (95% CI: 2.26‐4.56, P < .001), and 4.35 (95% CI: 3.07‐6.15, P < .001), respectively.

Conclusion

As the risk of malignancy for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is high, when any one of the five ultrasound features of malignancy were confirmed, repeated FNA is recommended to confirm PTC‐type malignancy, even though nodules were Bethesda III/IV classification. However, repeated FNA should be avoided when none of these ultrasound features are identified because repeated FNA does not contribute to identifying non‐PTC type malignancies, such as follicular thyroid carcinoma and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Patients with III and IV category of the Bethesda System under levothyroxine non-suppressive therapy have a lower rate of thyroid malignancy

Thyroid nodules (TNs) assigned to the Bethesda System categories III and IV include numerous clinical characteristics, which increase or decrease the risk of malignancy. However, there are very few data regarding the influence of TSH non-suppressive thyroid hormone therapy (NSTHT) on the risk of malignancy in patients in the aforementioned categories. We assessed the number of patients with thyroid nodules assigned to categories III and IV who take TSH NSTHT and if thyroid hormone therapy is associated with a rate of malignancy. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 4,716 individuals and selected 532 (11.28%) patients with Bethesda System category III and IV thyroid nodules. All participants underwent surgery, and histopathological verification was obtained in all cases. In all, 33.1% of individuals with category III and IV thyroid nodules took TSH NSTHT. In patients with category III nodules, application of NSTHT was associated with a lower rate of thyroid cancer (TC), though this observation was not significant (OR = 0.55, p = 0.381). In patients with category IV nodules, we demonstrated a significantly lower rate of TC when NSTHT was applied (OR = 0.44, p = 0.005). In conclusion, the prevalence of patients with Bethesda System category III and IV thyroid nodules who take NSTHT is high. TSH NSTHT significantly decreases a rate of malignancy in category IV, but not category III patients.

Risk of Malignancy According to the Sub-classification of Atypia of Undetermined Significance and Suspicious Follicular Neoplasm Categories in Thyroid Core Needle Biopsies

The objective of this study was to evaluate the risk of malignancy (ROM) associated with atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) and suspicious follicular neoplasm (SFN) core needle biopsy (CNB) categories after further sub-classification. Data from 2267 thyroid nodules evaluated by ultrasound-guided CNB, from January to December 2015, were retrospectively reviewed. AUS nodules (n = 556) were sub-classified as follows: (1) architectural atypia (AUS-A; n = 369, 66.4%), (2) cytologic atypia (AUS-C; n = 35, 6.3%), (3) cytologic/architectural atypia (AUS-C/A; n = 85, 15.3%), or (4) oncocytic atypia (AUS-O; n = 67, 12.1%). SFN nodules (n = 172) were sub-classified as follows: (1) architectural atypia only (SFN-A; n = 110, 64%), (2) cytologic/architectural atypia (SFN-C/A; n = 24, 14%), or (3) oncocytic atypia (SFN-O; n = 38, 22%). Diagnostic surgery was performed in 162 (30.2%) AUS cases and 105 (61%) SFN cases. The ROM of each sub-category was evaluated. The overall ROM was 15.3-52.5% in AUS nodules and 35.5-58.1% in SFN nodules. The ROM was higher in the AUS-C (22.9-88.9%) and AUS-C/A (32.9-90.3%) groups than AUS-A (11.9-40%) and AUS-O (7.5-41.7%). In the SFN category, ROM in the SFN-C/A group was also higher than SFN-A or SFN-O (37.5-75%, 40-57.9%, and 21.1-47.1%, respectively). Our study shows that the ROM was higher in AUS or SFN sub-categories with cytologic atypia than those without cytologic atypia. Because of the heterogeneous nature of AUS and SFN categories, sub-classification may be a more effective approach for risk stratification, allowing optimal management of patients with thyroid nodules.

Independent Comparison of the Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier and Gene Expression Classifier for Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Background: For thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology, the Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) identified benign nodules to reduce diagnostic surgery, though many nodules classified as suspicious still proved histopathologically benign. The current Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) demonstrates improved specificity, suggesting more nodules will have a benign result (benign call rate [BCR]), but independent data are needed to confirm this in clinical practice. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed of all Bethesda III or IV cytology thyroid nodules ≥1 cm tested with GEC (between January 1, 2011, and July 19, 2017) or GSC (between July 20, 2017, and August 27, 2018) at the authors' institution. Afirma testing was not performed reflectively for all nodules with Bethesda III or IV cytology, but rather was applied based on physician-patient decision making. Demographic, sonographic, and cytologic data were collected. The BCR for GEC- versus GSC-tested nodules was compared and further stratified by Bethesda classifications. Results: The study evaluated 600 nodules in 563 patients tested with either GEC (n = 486) or GSC (n = 114). The BCR was 233/486 (47.9%) for the GEC compared to 75/114 (65.8%) for the GSC (p = 0.0006). Hürthle-cell cytology was present in 99/486 (20.4%) nodules in the GEC group compared to 31/114 (27.2%) nodules in the GSC group (p = 0.28). The GSC BCR was significantly higher than the GEC BCR for Bethesda III nodules characterized by Hürthle cells (p = 0.006), but the BCRs were similar for nodules with architectural or cytologic atypia. In Bethesda IV nodules suspicious for follicular neoplasm, BCR for the GEC and GSC were similar (p = 0.68), but for cytology suspicious for Hürthle-cell neoplasm, the GSC BCR was 68.2% (15/22) compared to the GEC BCR of 16.4% (10/61; p < 0.0001). Positive predictive value in resected nodules with a suspicious result was 16/32 (50%) for GSC nodules and 75/221 (33.9%) for GEC nodules (p = 0.1). Conclusions: The higher BCR for the GSC compared to the GEC for indeterminate thyroid nodules, predominantly among nodules with Hürthle-cell cytology, will likely lead to further reduction in surgical management.

An Insight into the Utility of Sub-Categorisation of Atypia of Undetermined Significance for Risk Stratification: A Retrospective Study on an Indian Cohort with Histopathological Correlation

BACKGROUND

Atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) criterion in thyroid fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) has been a heterogeneous entity with much inter-observer variation. Sub-categorisation of AUS/FLUS has been observed to play an effective role in risk stratification. We aimed to validate AUS/FLUS sub-categorisation in correlation with the spectrum of malignancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Subjects included patients with AUS/FLUS diagnosed between January 2015 and December 2016. AUS/FLUS cases were sub-categorised into those exhibiting (1) architectural atypia, (2) cytological atypia, (3) architectural and cytological atypia, (4) AUS with Hürthle cells, and (5) AUS not otherwise specified (AUS-NOS). Each sub-category was correlated with their corresponding incidence of malignancy in surgical resections.

RESULT

The overall incidence of AUS/FLUS in our centre was 13% (132/1,018). On retrospective review of 117 patients with AUS/FLUS, smears with cytological atypia showed a higher incidence of malignancy (78.3%) than those with architectural atypia (75.3%). AUS/FLUS cases with both cytological and architectural atypia had a malignancy rate of 71.4%.

CONCLUSION

AUS/FLUS cases with cytological atypia had a higher risk of malignancy than those with architectural atypia. The sub-categorisation of AUS/FLUS is diagnostically important for the proper risk stratification of patients.

Validation of web-based thyroid imaging reporting and data system in atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) show variable malignancy risk. We validated the web-based predictive models and the scoring system by the American College of Radiology (ACR) for AUS/FLUS nodules to stratify the malignancy risk.

METHODS

From January 2011 to November 2014, 275 consecutive nodules diagnosed as AUS/FLUS were enrolled. The discrimination and calibration ability of a web-based scoring with inclusion of biopsy result and sonographic features, old web-based scoring model without biopsy result, and ACR models were assessed.

RESULTS

The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the validation set were 0.670 for the new web-based model, 0.710 for the old web-based model, and 0.732 for the ACR scoring risk-stratification model. All models were well calibrated.

CONCLUSION

The web-based scoring risk-stratification model using the combined information of ultrasonography features and biopsy result for AUS/FLUS nodules to stratify malignancy risk presents an acceptable predictive accuracy.

Cytomorphologic, Imaging, Molecular Findings, and Outcome in Thyroid Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance/Atypical Cell of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS): A Mini-Review

OBJECTIVES

Since the introduction of the entity of "Atypical cell of undetermined significance /follicular lesion of undetermined significance" (AUS/FLUS) by The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) in 2007, there have been many published studies about the cytomorphologic criteria, subclassification, outcome, and management of patients with the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS. There have been many studies in different aspects of this indeterminate category, i.e., cytologic and molecular findings, ultrasonographic findings, and in some instances even core-needle biopsy to address a better and safer way of the management of patients with this fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis. The second edition of TBSRTC and the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines provide an update on the follow-up and management of AUS/FLUS. A multidisciplinary team consisting of pathologists, endocrinologists, surgeons, and radiologists should be involved in the diagnosis and management of AUS/FLUS, and all of them should be aware of the heterogeneity of this lesion for the prediction of the treatment and outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

In this review, we consider different research platforms (2008-2017) to find the best and key reports for the above-mentioned challenging aspects of AUS/FLUS.

CONCLUSION

AUS/FLUS is now a well-defined group of thyroid lesions, which can be most accurately diagnosed and managed with cytomorphology, molecular, and ancillary studies.

Both Ultrasound Features and Nuclear Atypia are Associated with Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules with Atypia of Undetermined Significance

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of thyroid nodules that undergo fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with findings of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) is unclear. Categorizing nodules by AUS subtype and ultrasound characteristics may improve risk stratification. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between AUS subtype and ultrasound features on risk of malignancy (ROM).

METHODS

We performed a review of all patients with a thyroid nodule who underwent an FNA at our institution between January 2010 and November 2015. Patients with AUS were divided into groups with (1) nuclear atypia, (2) architectural atypia, or (3) Hurthle cell atypia. Their ultrasound features were assessed using the American Thyroid Association (ATA) thyroid nodule sonographic patterns. We conducted a univariate and multivariable analysis to determine the association between AUS subtype and other variables of interest with ROM.

RESULTS

Of the 3428 thyroid nodules that underwent FNA, 237 (6.9%) had AUS. Of the 97 surgically resected nodules, 67 (69%) were benign and 30 (31%) were malignant. On univariate analysis nuclear atypia (p < 0.01) was associated with a thyroid malignancy. On multivariable analysis, both ATA high-risk ultrasound features (p = 0.04, odds ratio [OR] 3.68) and nuclear atypia (p < 0.01, OR 11.8) were independently associated with a final diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Nuclear atypia and ATA high-risk ultrasound features are useful in identifying patients with AUS that are at a higher risk of thyroid malignancy. Surgeons should take these factors into consideration when evaluating patients with AUS.

Prevalence and associated malignancy of Bethesda category III cytologies of thyroid nodules assigned to the "cytological atypia" or "architectural atypia" groups

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain the prevalence of Bethesda category III cytologies and their malignancy rate, and to analyze differences in the second cytology, malignancy rate, type of carcinoma, and TNM stage between the cytological atypia (CA) and architectural atypia (AA) groups.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A retrospective study of 973 biopsies. Bethesda category III cytologies were classified as CA when nuclear atypia was seen but they were not diagnostic or suspicious of malignancy, and as AA when smears had few cells but had a predominantly microfollicular pattern and minimal or absent colloid. The cytological and pathological results were correlated.

RESULTS

There were 87 (8.9%) Bethesda category III cytologies (34 CC, 53 AA). Second cytologies were performed in 23 patients (16 with CA, 7 with AA), and a benign result was found in 68.7% of CA and 71.4% of the AA group. Sixty-four patients (23 CA, 41 AA) underwent surgery and 15 of these (23.4%) had a malignant disease: 39.1% CA vs 14.6% AA (P=.029). There was a false negative result in the CA group. The follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma was the most common malignancy (60%). There were no differences in type of carcinoma or TNM stage between CA and AA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The reported prevalence of Bethesda category III cytologies was as expected. The malignancy rate was significantly higher in the CA group, but there were no differences in the result of the second cytology, type of carcinoma found, or TNM stage. The division of Bethesda category III cytologies is useful to provide a better stratification of the risk of malignancy.

Thyroid cancer detection rate and associated risk factors in patients with thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category III

Background Ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a standard procedure for thyroid nodules management and selecting patients for surgical treatment. Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), as stated by The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, is a diagnostic category with an implied malignancy risk of 5-15%. The aim of our study was to review cytology and histopathology reports, as well as clinical and ultrasound data, for thyroid nodules reported as AUS/FLUS, in order to evaluate the malignancy rate and to assess factors associated with malignant outcome. Patients and methods A total of 112 AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules in 105 patients were evaluated, of which 85 (75.9%) were referred to surgery, 21 (18.8%) were followed-up by repeat FNA and 6 nodules (5.3%) were clinically observed. Each was categorized in two final diagnostic groups - benign or malignant, which were further compared to clinical data of patients and ultrasonographic features of the nodules. Results Final diagnosis of malignancy was reached in 35 cases (31.2%) and 77 (68.8%) had benign lesions. The most frequent type of cancer was papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) - 58.1% PTC and 25.8% had follicular variant of PTC. Patients' younger age, smaller nodule size, hypoechoic nodule and presence of calcifications were shown to be statistically significant risk factors for malignancy. Conclusions The rate of malignancy for the AUS/FLUS diagnostic category in our study was higher than estimated by the Bethesda System. Clinical and ultrasound factors should be considered when decision for patient treatment is being made.

Evaluation of selected ultrasound features of thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance for the Bethesda reporting system for thyroid cytology

Background and objective

The risk of malignancy from “atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance” (AUS/FLUS) is estimated to lie between 5% and 15%; however, some authors suggest that the risk of malignancy in AUS/FLUS depends upon specific clinical situations. This was a retrospective study which aimed to determine the incidence and risk of thyroid cancer (TC) based upon selected ultrasound features from patients with thyroid nodules (TN) classified as AUS/FLUS.

Methods

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify significant associations between ultrasound features and the risk of TC.

Results

Of 127 patients with TN classified as AUS/FLUS who underwent thyroidectomy, 114 (89.8%) had benign disease while 13 (10.2%) had TC. Univariate analysis identified several significant predictors for TC (all p<0.05), including microcalcifications, hypoechogenicity, the prevalence of irregular margins, a taller rather than a wide form, high vascularity, and fast tumor growth. Multivariate analysis further showed that microcalcifications (odds ratio =21.37; p=0.024) and fast growth (odds ratio =22.70; p=0.021) were significant and independent factors associated with the risk of developing TC.

Conclusion

Microcalcifications and fast growth of the TN could therefore be used as predictive factors for the development of TC in patients with AUS/FLUS.

Performance of Italian Consensus for the Classification and Reporting of Thyroid Cytology (ICCRTC) in discriminating indeterminate lesions at low and high risk of malignancy. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology was published in 2014 and it has been used in almost all Italian institutions. To date, there are not solid data on the reliability of Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology in classifying low and high risk indeterminate nodules (Tir 3A and Tir 3B, respectively). Here, we reviewed and meta-analyzed the results of published articles to obtain evidence-based information on this topic.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature exploration of online databases was conducted by searching all published papers citing Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology. The search was updated until June 2017, and references of the retrieved articles were also screened. Only original articles reporting histologic follow-up of nodules cytologically classified as Tir 3A and Tir 3B were eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

The literature search revealed 62 articles and six of these were eligible for the study. All papers were retrospective and published very recently. Overall, 423 indeterminate lesions, of which 180 Tir 3A and 243 Tir 3B, were found. Of these, 29 cancers were recorded in Tir 3A and 127 in Tir 3B. The pooled rate of malignancy was 17% (95% CI = 12 to 22%) in Tir 3A and 52% (95% CI = 46 to 58%) in Tir 3B. No significant publication bias was evident.

CONCLUSIONS

Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology 2014 shows high reliability in discriminating indeterminate lesions at low risk of malignancy from those at high risk.

Different qualifiers of AUS/FLUS thyroid FNA have distinct BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, and PAX8/PPARg alterations

BACKGROUND

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology category of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) includes fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens that cannot straightforwardly be classified as benign or malignant. To determine whether morphological subcategorization based on atypia qualifiers and molecular testing could improve malignancy risk stratification of AUS/FLUS patients, this study assessed the correlation between these qualifiers and the molecular alterations commonly harbored by thyroid neoplasms.

METHODS

A total of 162 AUS/FLUS cases were subcategorized by atypia qualifiers (Hürthle cell changes, architectural atypia, and cytologic atypia [CyA]) and were tested for BRAF, N-H-KRAS, RET/PTC, and paired box 8 (PAX8)/peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPARg) mutations.

RESULTS

CyA was observed more frequently in mutation-positive AUS/FLUS (14 of 37 [37.84%]) than mutation-negative AUS/FLUS (20 of 125 [16.00%]; P < .0084), and it specifically harbored the BRAFV600E point mutation. Malignancy was confirmed in the available follow-up. Conversely, although RAS was the most frequent mutation identified in AUS/FLUS FNA specimens (26 of 37 cases [70.27%]; P < .0001), it was distributed across various AUS/FLUS subcategories and was not significantly associated with a specific atypia qualifier or malignant outcome according to the available follow-up. Rearrangements of both RET/PTC (n = 1) and PAX8/PPARg (n = 3) were rarely retrieved in the FNA samples.

CONCLUSIONS

BRAF and RAS mutations are associated with different AUS/FLUS qualifiers and hence have different risks of malignancy. Consequently, a hybrid molecular and morphological subcategorization system could improve the malignancy risk stratification of thyroid FNA samples diagnosed as AUS/FLUS. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:317-25. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

The presence of papillary features in thyroid nodules diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance increases cancer risk and should influence treatment

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of papillary features on risk of malignancy (ROM) within the Atypia of Undetermined Significance or Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance (AUS-FLUS) Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) diagnostic category.

METHODS

A Retrospective review of cases with an AUS-FLUS diagnosis that underwent a thyroidectomy was carried out, and cases were subcategorized based upon the presence of papillary features.

RESULTS

For the entire study population there were 93 (22%) of 427 FNAB specimens that had an AUS-FLUS diagnosis, and a 32% associated ROM. Papillary features were identified in 44 FNAB specimens (47% of the AUS-FLUS cases or 10% of the entire study population), and when present had a 45% ROM. The 49 FNAB specimens (53%) that did not exhibit papillary features had a significantly lower ROM (20%) than those that did have papillary features (p = 0.0069).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of papillary features in a thyroid FNAB with an AUS-FLUS diagnosis is common, and is associated with a higher ROM than is currently suggested by the BSRTC.

The impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on the rate of malignancy for atypia of undetermined significance subcategories

BACKGROUND

The recent revision in terminology, with noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) replacing noninvasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma, has reclassified the clinically indolent tumor as nonmalignant. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this change on the rate of malignancy (ROM) for subcategories of an atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) diagnosis on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology.

METHODS

Consecutive thyroid FNAs interpreted as AUS over a period of 4 years were retrospectively analyzed. The ROM for AUS subcategories, including atypia of undetermined significance with nuclear atypia (AUS-N), atypia of undetermined significance with a microfollicular pattern (AUS-F), atypia of undetermined significance with nuclear atypia and a microfollicular pattern (AUS-N/F), atypia of undetermined significance with Hürthle cells (AUS-H), and atypia of undetermined significance, not otherwise specified (AUS-NOS), were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 426 nodules interpreted as AUS, 244 were surgically excised. The incidence of NIFTP in each subcategory was as follows: 18% for AUS-N, 18% for AUS-F, 9% for AUS-N/F, 3% for AUS-H, and 0% for AUS-NOS. After the reclassification of NIFTP as nonmalignant, the ROM based on histologic follow-up significantly decreased from 43% to 26% for AUS-N (P < .001) and from 29% to 10% for AUS-F (P = .008). The ROM for AUS-N remained significantly higher than the ROM for AUS-F (P = .030).

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of resected AUS nodules can be reclassified as NIFTP, and that significantly decreases the ROM, especially for AUS-N and AUS-F. Nonetheless, AUS-N still harbors a substantially higher ROM than AUS-F. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:309-16. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Cancer Risk Stratification of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Cytological Approach

BACKGROUND

Management recommendations for thyroid nodules rely primarily on the cytological diagnosis. However, 25% of biopsies render an indeterminate cytology for which management decision is more challenging due to heterogeneity of the specimens. This study aimed to stratify the cancer risk through subcategorization of indeterminate cytology.

METHODS

The indeterminate cytological specimens (Bethesda-III or IV) of 518 thyroid nodules consecutively evaluated at our academic cancer center between October 2008 and September 2015, blinded to the histological outcome, were retrospectively reviewed. Cytological specimens were subclassified into four groups: aspirates exhibiting nuclear atypia (n = 158; 31%); architectural atypia (n = 222; 43%); oncocytic features (n = 120; 23%); or other types of atypia (n = 18; 3%). The prevalence of malignancy and odds ratio for malignancy were calculated in 323 nodules with histological confirmation.

RESULTS

The prevalence of malignancy was 26% overall (20% in Bethesda-III and 29% in Bethesda-IV; p = 0.07), and 47%, 12%, 24%, and 25% for aspirates with nuclear atypia, architectural atypia, oncocytic features, or other types of atypia, respectively. The OR of nuclear atypia over architectural atypia was 6.4 (3.4-12.2; p < 0.001), and 2.7 over oncocytic features (1.4-5.1; p = 0.01), whereas the OR of architectural atypia over oncocytic features was 0.4 (0.2-0.9; p = 0.03). Results were similar for Bethesda-III and IV aspirates when analyzed independently. Furthermore, cytological subcategories improved cytology-histology correlation, as they were associated with distinct profiles of histological diagnoses (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cytological subcategories can effectively stratify the risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology and improve cytology-histology correlation.

Comparison of risk of malignancy in a subgroup with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

As heterogeneous findings are included in the atypia of undetermined significance (AUS)/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS) category, differing risks of malignancy in subgroups have been reported in several articles.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis of full-text publications written in English found in the Embase and PubMed databases.

RESULTS

The 4-tiered subgroup proportion meta-analysis showed that the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the risk of malignancy in the cellular atypia group did not overlap with the other 3 subgroups and demonstrated a significant difference. Two-tiered analysis using the cytologic and architectural atypia groups showed that cytologic atypia group had a 2.64-fold increase in the risk of malignancy compared with the architectural atypia group.

CONCLUSION

The cytologic atypia had a significantly higher risk of malignancy than the architectural atypia group, and it should be considered as a separate category.

Qualifiers of atypia in the cytologic diagnosis of thyroid nodules are associated with different Afirma gene expression classifier results and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) on fine‐needle aspiration (FNA) have a low risk of malignancy that appears to vary based on specific features described in the AUS diagnosis. The Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) is a molecular test designed to improve preoperative risk stratification of thyroid nodules, but its performance for different patterns of AUS has not been defined. The objective of this study was to assess GEC results and clinical outcomes in AUS nodules with architectural atypia (AUS‐A), cytologic atypia (AUS‐C) or both (AUS‐C/A).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of all thyroid nodules with AUS cytopathology that underwent GEC testing at the authors' institution over a period of >4 years.

RESULTS

In 227 nodules that had AUS cytology results and Afirma GEC testing, the rate of benign GEC results was higher in AUS‐A nodules (70 of 107; 65%) than in AUS‐C/A nodules (25 of 65; 38%; P = .0008), and AUS‐C nodules exhibited an intermediate rate of benign results (27 of 55 nodules; 59%). The risk of cancer among patients who had GEC‐suspicious nodules, 86% of whom underwent resection, was 19% (6 of 25) for AUS‐A nodules compared with 57% (21 of 37) for AUS‐C/A nodules (P = .003) and 45% (10 of 22) for AUS‐C nodules (P = .07). In nodules that had an indeterminate repeat cytology result, no difference was observed in the rate of benign GEC results or in the malignancy rate compared with nodules that had a single cytology result.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance characteristics of Afirma GEC testing vary, depending on qualifiers of cytologic atypia. Recognition of these differences may enable clinicians to provide improved counseling and treatment recommendations to patients. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:313–322. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance cytology and Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC) testing are analyzed based on the presence of architectural, cytologic, or both cytologic and architectural atypia. Nodules with architectural atypia are the most likely to have a benign GEC result and least likely to be malignant, suggesting that clinicians should be aware of these cytologic qualifiers when advising patients regarding GEC testing and the risk of malignancy.

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: Proposed Modifications and Updates for the Second Edition from an International Panel

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) was proposed in 2007 at the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Art and Science Conference held in Bethesda, Maryland. The aim was to address the inconsistent and sometimes confusing reporting terminologies used for thyroid FNA throughout the world. The TBSRTC consists of 6 diagnostic categories, each associated with an implied risk of malignancy that translates directly into a clinical management algorithm. Since the publication of the TBSRTC cytology Atlas in January 2010, considerable experience has been gained regarding its application in cytology practice, clinical impact, and limitations. In conjunction with the International Academy of Cytology (IAC), an international panel composed of sixteen cytopathologists and an endocrinologist with special interest in thyroid cytology, including several co-authors of the 2010 TBSRTC Atlas, was created to: (1) analyze the current worldwide impact of TBSRTC, (2) report on the current state of TBSRTC based upon a review of the published literature, and (3) provide possible recommendations for a future update of TBSRTC. Herein, we summarize the panel's deliberations and key recommendations that our panel hopes will be useful during the preparation of the second edition of TBSRTC.

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: proposed modifications and updates for the second edition from an international panel

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (TBSRTC) was proposed in 2007 at the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Art and Science » Conference held in Bethesda, Maryland. The aim was to address the inconsistent and sometimes confusing reporting terminologies used for thyroid FNA throughout the world. The TBSRTC consists of 6 diagnostic categories, each associated with an implied risk of malignancy that translates directly into a clinical management algorithm. Since the publication of the TBSRTC cytology Atlas in January 2010, considerable experience has been gained regarding its application in cytology practice, clinical impact, and limitations. In conjunction with the International Academy of Cytology (IAC), an international panel composed of sixteen cytopathologists and an endocrinologist with special interest in thyroid cytology, including several co-authors of the 2010 TBSRTC Atlas, was created to: 1) analyze the current worldwide impact of TBSRTC, 2) report on the current state of TBSRTC based upon a review of the published literature, and 3) provide possible recommendations for a future update of TBSRTC. Herein, we summarize the panel's deliberations and key recommendations that our panel hopes will be useful during the preparation of the second edition of TBSRTC.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, AND ASSOCIAZIONE MEDICI ENDOCRINOLOGI MEDICAL GUIDELINES FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF THYROID NODULES--2016 UPDATE

Thyroid nodules are detected in up to 50 to 60% of healthy subjects. Most nodules do not cause clinically significant symptoms, and as a result, the main challenge in their management is to rule out malignancy, with ultrasonography (US) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy serving as diagnostic cornerstones. The key issues discussed in these guidelines are as follows: (1) US-based categorization of the malignancy risk and indications for US-guided FNA (henceforth, FNA), (2) cytologic classification of FNA samples, (3) the roles of immunocytochemistry and molecular testing applied to thyroid FNA, (4) therapeutic options, and (5) follow-up strategy. Thyroid nodule management during pregnancy and in children are also addressed. On the basis of US features, thyroid nodules may be categorized into 3 groups: low-, intermediate-and high-malignancy risk. FNA should be considered for nodules ≤10 mm diameter only when suspicious US signs are present, while nodules ≤5 mm should be monitored rather than biopsied. A classification scheme of 5 categories (nondiagnostic, benign, indeterminate, suspicious for malignancy, or malignant) is recommended for the cytologic report. Indeterminate lesions are further subdivided into 2 subclasses to more accurately stratify the risk of malignancy. At present, no single cytochemical or genetic marker can definitely rule out malignancy in indeterminate nodules. Nevertheless, these tools should be considered together with clinical data, US signs, elastographic pattern, or results of other imaging techniques to improve the management of these lesions. Most thyroid nodules do not require any treatment, and levothyroxine (LT4) suppressive therapy is not recommended. Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) should be the first-line treatment option for relapsing, benign cystic lesions, while US-guided thermal ablation treatments may be considered for solid or mixed symptomatic benign thyroid nodules. Surgery remains the treatment of choice for malignant or suspicious nodules. The present document updates previous guidelines released in 2006 and 2010 by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), American College of Endocrinology (ACE) and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi (AME).

Subcategorization of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS): a study applying Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical significance and compare the imaging features according to the Thyroid Image Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) between atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) subcategories.

DESIGN & PATIENTS

A total of 192 thyroid nodules in 188 patients (mean age: 50·2 ± 11·8 years) that had been initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS on US-guided fine needle aspiration (US-FNA) were included. One cytopathologist retrospectively reviewed the cytology slides, subcategorizing cytology results into AUS and FLUS. A TIRADS category was assigned to each thyroid nodule according to the number of suspicious US features. Clinical, US features and malignancy rates were compared between the two subcategories.

RESULTS

Of the 192 AUS/FLUS lesions, 149 (77·6%) were subcategorized as AUS and 43 (22·4%) as FLUS. Of the 192 AUS/FLUS nodules, 82 (42·7%) were malignant. The malignancy rates between AUS and FLUS subcategories were not significantly different, 45·6% to 32·6%, respectively (P = 0·127). When applying TIRADS, significant differences were seen in TIRADS category between benign and malignant nodules in the AUS subcategory (P < 0·001), but not in the FLUS subcategory (P = 0·414). The malignancy rates in TIRADS categories 3, 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 were 15·4%, 22·2%, 33·3%, 57·1% and 80·0% (P < 0·001) in AUS nodules and 40·0%, 50·0%, 23·5%, 22·2% and 0·0% (P = 0·414) in FLUS nodules, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Suspicious US features are useful in predicting malignancy among AUS subcategories but not in FLUS subcategories. Subcategorization into AUS and FLUS cytology may be helpful in deciding upon treatment or management of thyroid nodules.

Morphometric Analysis of Thyroid Follicular Cells with Atypia of Undetermined Significance

BACKGROUND

Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) is a category that encompasses a heterogeneous group of thyroid aspiration cytology. It has been reclassified into two subgroups based on the cytomorphologic features: AUS with cytologic atypia and AUS with architectural atypia. The nuclear characteristics of AUS with cytologic atypia need to be clarified by comparing to those observed in Hashimoto thyroiditis and benign follicular lesions.

METHODS

We selected 84 cases of AUS with histologic follow-up, 24 cases of Hashimoto thyroiditis, and 26 cases of benign follicular lesions. We also subcategorized the AUS group according to the follow-up biopsy results into a papillary carcinoma group and a nodular hyperplasia group. The differences in morphometric parameters, including the nuclear areas and perimeters, were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

The AUS group had significantly smaller nuclear areas than the Hashimoto thyroiditis group, but the nuclear perimeters were not statistically different. The AUS group also had significantly smaller nuclear areas than the benign follicular lesion group; however, the AUS group had significantly longer nuclear perimeters. The nuclear areas in the papillary carcinoma group were significantly smaller than those in the nodular hyperplasia group; however, the nuclear perimeters were not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

We found the AUS group to be a heterogeneous entity, including histologic follow-up diagnoses of papillary carcinoma and nodular hyperplasia. The AUS group showed significantly greater nuclear irregularities than the other two groups. Utilizing these features, nuclear morphometry could lead to improvements in the accuracy of the subjective diagnoses made with thyroid aspiration cytology.

Subcategorization of Bethesda System Category III by Ultrasonography

BACKGROUND

Bethesda System category III (atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance [AUS/FLUS]) creates a dilemma because of heterogeneity. The aim of this study was to assess whether ultrasonography (US) contributes to differentiating AUS from FLUS and may suggest characteristics of malignancy within category III.

METHODS

From April 2011 to April 2012, 433 thyroid nodules that had been interpreted as nuclear atypia (AUS group; n = 322) or microfollicular architecture (FLUS group; n = 111) were included in the retrospective study. Final diagnoses were acquired in 327 nodules after surgery and clinico-radiological follow-up. The AUS group and FLUS group were compared in terms of US features (composition, echogenicity, margin, shape, and calcifications), US diagnosis (probably benign, malignant), malignancy rate, and final malignant histology.

RESULTS

In univariate and multivariate analysis, the AUS group more frequently had non-circumscribed margins, taller-than-wide shape, and an US diagnosis suggestive for malignancy than the FLUS group did. The risk of malignancy was significantly higher in the AUS group than it was in the FLUS group (51.0% vs.8.1%; p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the presence of a BRAF mutation between the AUS group and the FLUS group (47.6% vs. 4.2%; p < 0.001). Of the patients with malignancy, papillary thyroid carcinoma was found more frequently in the AUS group than in the FLUS group (97.7% vs. 66.7%; p = 0.004). The incidence of follicular thyroid carcinoma was significantly higher in the FLUS group than it was in the AUS group (33.3% vs.1.6%; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Bethesda System category III subcategorization into AUS and FLUS can be supported by US features. In Bethesda III nodules, US features may further help in predicting a malignant histology.