Utility of CD279/PD-1 immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of benign and neoplastic T-cell-rich bone marrow infiltrates

Immunoscore system combining CD8 and PD-1/PD-L1: A novel approach that predicts the clinical outcomes for cervical cancer

PURPOSE

Immunoscore was established to evaluate the prognosis of cancer patients. However, the feasibility of Immunoscore for the prognosis of cervical cancer remains unknown. To find other prognostic markers that contribute to immunological importance, immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein (PD-1), or its ligand, PD-L1, are of enormous interest. Our purpose is to investigate the expression of CD8 and PD-1/PD-L1 and their potential role in Immunoscore, supplementing the tumor/node/metastasis (TNM) classification of cervical cancer.

METHODS

Immunoscore was assessed according to the density of PD-1, PD-L1, and CD8 by immunohistochemistry. The association with overall survival and disease-free survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. To evaluate the effect of Immunoscore, a Cox proportional hazard regression classification was conducted. To compare the prognostic accuracies of Immunoscore and TNM staging, receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted.

RESULTS

Patients with PD-L1^positive and PD-1^high in immune cells had poorer overall survival and disease-free survival; however, PD-L1^positive in tumor cells that infiltrated more CD8⁺ T cells were related to better overall survival and disease-free survival. These immune factors can be independent predictors for prognoses. According to these factors, a new Immunoscore system with priority in predicting prognoses was established. In receiver operating characteristic analysis for predictions of overall survival (the area under curve (AUC) = 0.833 vs. 0.766) and disease-free survival (AUC = 0.861 vs. 0.729), Immunoscore is more accurate than TNM staging.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, this Immunoscore system is an accurate predictive marker, which can be an important supplement to TNM staging for cervical cancer.

A Four-Factor Immunoscore System That Predicts Clinical Outcome for Stage II/III Gastric Cancer

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system is insufficiently prognostic for operable gastric cancer patients; therefore, complementary factors are under intense investigation. Although the focus is on immune markers, the prognostic impact of a single immune factor is minimal, due to complex antitumor immune responses. A more comprehensive evaluation may engender more accurate predictions. We analyzed immune factors by immunohistochemical staining in two independent cohorts. The association with patients' survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Our immunoscore system was constructed using Cox proportional hazard analysis. PD-L1⁺ immune cells (IC), PD-L1⁺ tumor cells (TC), PD-1^hi, and CD8^More were found among 33.33%, 31.37%, 33.33%, and 49%, respectively, of patients from the discovery cohort, and 41.74%, 17.4%, 38.26%, and 30.43% from the validation cohort. PD-L1⁺ ICs and PD-1^hi ICs correlated with poorer overall survival (OS), but PD-L1⁺ TCs correlated with better OS and clinical outcomes and infiltration of more CD8⁺ T cells. These four factors were independently prognostic after tumor/lymph nodes/metastasis (TNM) stage adjustment. An immunoscore system based on hazard ratios of the four factors further separated gastric cancer patients with similar TNM staging into low-, medium-, or high-risk groups, with significantly different survival. Our prognostic model yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.856 for prediction of mortality at 5 years, superior to that of TNM staging (AUC of 0.676). Thus, this more comprehensive immunoscore system can provide more accurate prognoses and is an essential complement to the AJCC staging system for operable gastric cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Res; 5(7); 524-34. ©2017 AACR.