Assessment of platelet function in whole blood by multiple electrode aggregometry: transport of samples using a pneumatic tube system

Pneumatic tube transport of blood samples affects global hemostasis and platelet function assays

INTRODUCTION

Pneumatic tube systems (PTS) are frequently used for rapid and cost-effective transportation of blood samples to the clinical laboratory. The impact of PTS transport on platelet function measured by the Multiplate system and global hemostasis measured by the TEG 5000 was evaluated.

METHODS

Paired samples from healthy adult individuals were obtained at two study sites: Rigshospitalet (RH) and Nordsjaellands Hospital (NOH). One sample was transported by PTS and one manually (non-PTS). Platelet function was assessed by platelet aggregation (Multiplate) and global hemostasis was assessed by a variety of thrombelastography (TEG) assays. Multiplate (n = 39) and TEG (n = 32) analysis was performed at site RH, and Multiplate (n = 28) analysis was performed at site NOH.

RESULTS

A significant higher agonist-induced platelet aggregation was found for PTS samples compared to manual transport at site NOH (P < .02, all agonists). No significant difference was found at site RH (P > .05, all agonists). For Kaolin TEG, samples transported by PTS showed a significant lower R-time and higher Angle (P < .001). No significant differences in MA and LY30 was found (P > .05). ACT of RapidTEG was significantly reduced (P = .001) and MA of Functional Fibrinogen TEG was significantly increased (P < .001) after PTS transport. No significant impact of PTS was observed for TEG assays with heparinase (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Depending on the type of PTS, transportation by PTS affected platelet aggregation measured by Multiplate. Furthermore, PTS alters TEG parameters possibly reflecting coagulation factors. Clinical laboratories should evaluate the effect of the local PTS on Multiplate and TEG results.

Use of clinical data and acceleration profiles to validate pneumatic transportation systems

Background

Modern pneumatic transportation systems (PTSs) are widely used in hospitals for rapid blood sample transportation. The use of PTS may affect sample integrity. Impact on sample integrity in relation to hemolysis and platelet assays was investigated and also, we wish to outline a process-based and outcome-based validation model for this preanalytical component.

Methods

The effect of PTS was evaluated by drawing duplicate blood samples from healthy volunteers, one sent by PTS and the other transported manually to the core laboratory. Markers of hemolysis (potassium, lactate dehydrogenase [LD] and hemolysis index [HI]) and platelet function and activation were assessed. Historic laboratory test results of hemolysis markers measured before and after implementation of PTS were compared. Furthermore, acceleration profiles during PTS and manual transportation were obtained from a mini g logger in a sample tube.

Results

Hand-carried samples experienced a maximum peak acceleration of 5 g, while peaks at almost 15 g were observed for PTS. No differences were detected in results of potassium, LD, platelet function and activation between PTS and manual transport. Using past laboratory data, differences in potassium and LD significantly differed before and after PTS installation for all three lines evaluated. However, these estimated differences were not clinically significant.

Conclusions

In this study, we found no evidence of PTS-induced hemolysis or impact on platelet function or activation assays. Further, we did not find any clinically significant changes indicating an acceleration-dependent impact on blood sample quality. Quality assurance of PTS can be performed by surveilling outcome markers such as HI, potassium and LD.

Blood Sample Transportation by Pneumatic Transportation Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Pneumatic transportation systems (PTSs) are increasingly used for transportation of blood samples to the core laboratory. Many studies have investigated the impact of these systems on different types of analyses, but to elucidate whether PTSs in general are safe for transportation of blood samples, existing literature on the subject was systematically assessed.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses (PRISMA) Statement guidelines to gather studies investigating the impact of PTS on analyses in blood samples. Studies were extracted from PubMed and Embase. The search period ended November 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 39 studies were retrieved. Of these, only 12 studies were conducted on inpatients, mainly intensive care unit patients. Blood gases, hematology, and clinical chemistry were well investigated, whereas coagulation, rotational thromboelastometry, and platelet function in acutely ill patients were addressed by only 1 study each. Only a few parameters were affected in a clinically significant way (clotting time parameter in extrinsic system thromboelastometry, pO2 in blood gas, multiplate analysis, and the hemolysis index).

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to their high degree of heterogeneity, the retrieved studies were unable to supply evidence for the safety of using PTSs for blood sample transportation. In consequence, laboratories need to measure and document the actual acceleration forces in their existing PTS, instituting quality target thresholds for these measurements such as acceleration vector sums. Computer modeling might be applied to the evaluation of future PTS installations. With the increasing use of PTS, a harmonized, international recommendation on this topic is warranted.

Oláh A, Köteles J, Kissné Sziráki V, Kerényi A, Kappelmayer J. Pneumatic tube system for transport of laboratory samples: preanalytical aspects

Introduction: A considerable proportion of laboratory errors occurs in the preanalytical phase. Aim: The aims of the authors were to study preanalytical errors in routine and emergency laboratory diagnostics in a regional clinical laboratory and evaluate the effect of the pneumatic tube system on turnaround time and laboratory results. Method: The ratio of preanalytical errors and reasons of test rejection were analysed. In addition, the effects of pneumatic tube and manual transport on the occurrence of hemolysis and platelet activation were compared. Results: Using the pneumatic tube transport system, preanalytical error was below 1%. The main causes of test rejection were haemolysis in case of serum samples, and clot formation and citrate excess in anticoagulated samples. The pneumatic tube transport resulted in significantly faster sample transport, more equalized sample arrival and processing, hence the turnaround time became shorter both for routine and emergency tests. Conclusions: Autovalidation and proper control of preanalytical errors are essential for rapid and reliable laboratory service supported by the pneumatic tube system for sample transport. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(28), 1113–1120.

Pneumatic tube transport affects platelet function measured by multiplate electrode aggregometry

Multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) is used to measure platelet function. Pneumatic tube transport systems (PTS) for delivery of patient samples to a central laboratory are often used to reduce turnaround time for vital analyses. We evaluated the effects of PTS transport on platelet function as measured by MEA. Duplicate samples were collected from 58 individuals. One sample was sent using PTS and the other was carried by personnel to the lab. Platelet function was measured by means of a Multiplate® analyzer using the ADP test, ASPI test, COL test, RISTO test and TRAP test. Samples transported using PTS showed a reduction of AUC-values of up to a 100% of the average as compared to samples carried by personnel and a majority showed reductions of AUC-values greater than 20% of the average. Bias±95% limits of agreement for the ADP test were 26±56% of the average. Bias±95% limits of agreement for the ASPI test were 16±58% of the average. Bias±95% limits of agreement for the COL test were 20±54% of the average. Bias±95% limits of agreement for the RISTO were 14±79% of the average. Bias±95% limits of agreement for the TRAP test were 19±45% of the average. We conclude that PTS transport affect platelet activity as measured by MEA. We advise against clinical decisions regarding platelet function on the basis of samples sent by PTS in our hospital settings.

Sample transport by pneumatic tube system alters results of multiple electrode aggregometry but not rotational thromboelastometry

Pneumatic tube systems (PTS) present a convenient way for blood sample transport in medical facilities. Associated preanalytical interference in various tests is largely unknown. Implementing point-of-care coagulation management at our institution, we investigated multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) after PTS transportation. Whole blood samples from patients undergoing general or trauma surgery were analysed by MEA after collection (baseline, '0 × PTS') and sent on a predefined PTS track (n = 12). MEA was repeated after samples travelled the track 4 ('4 × PTS'), 8 ('8 × PTS') and 12 times ('12 × PTS') and compared with stationary controls analysed at the same time. Samples for ROTEM (n = 6) were analysed after collection and travelling the track 12 times. An acceleration detector recorded g-forces on the PTS track. At '0 × PTS' no significant differences in MEA results were detected. Values were significantly lower for transported samples compared with controls ('4 × PTS' to '12 × PTS', p < 0.001). Furthermore, MEA results of PTS samples were significantly decreased for '4 × PTS' to '12 × PTS' compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Except for the clotting time in EXTEM PTS transport did not significantly alter results for investigated ROTEM parameters, compared with baseline and stationary controls. Acceleration detector readout revealed alternating g-forces between -6.3 and +5.9 during transport. PTS transport caused invalid results in MEA while only one ROTEM parameter was found to be affected in this study. Variable acceleration during transport provides a potential reason for platelet activation. The authors recommend sample transport by hand or the device to be placed patient-side when MEA is performed.