Minimal adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsy tissue

Limited Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate on Needle Core Biopsy

CONTEXT.—

Grading small foci of prostate cancer on a needle biopsy is often difficult, yet the clinical significance of accurate grading remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess if grading of limited adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy specimen is critical.

DESIGN.—

We studied 295 consecutive patients undergoing extended-sextant biopsy with only 1-core involvement of adenocarcinoma, followed by radical prostatectomy.

RESULTS.—

The linear tumor lengths on these biopsy specimens were: less than 1 mm (n = 114); 1 mm or more or less than 2 mm (n = 82); 2 mm or more or less than 3 mm (n = 35); and 3 mm or more (n = 64). Longer length was strongly associated with higher Grade Group (GG) on biopsy or prostatectomy specimen, higher risk of extraprostatic extension/seminal vesicle invasion and positive surgical margin, and larger estimated tumor volume. When cases were compared based on biopsy specimen GG, higher grade was strongly associated with higher prostatectomy specimen GG, higher incidence of pT3/pT3b disease, and larger tumor volume. Outcome analysis further showed significantly higher risks for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with 1 mm or more, 2 mm or more, 3 mm or more, GG2-4, GG3-4, GG4, less than 1 mm/GG2-4, less than 1 mm/GG3-4, less than 2 mm/GG3-4, 3 mm or more/GG2-4, or 3 mm or more/GG3-4 tumor on biopsy specimens, compared with respective control subgroups. In particular, 3 mm or more, GG3, and GG4 on biopsy specimens showed significance as independent prognosticators by multivariate analysis. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the rate of upgrading or downgrading after radical prostatectomy among those subgrouped by biopsy specimen tumor length (eg, <1 mm [44.7%] versus ≥1/<2 mm [41.5%] versus ≥2/<3 mm [45.7%] versus ≥3 mm [46.9%]).

CONCLUSIONS.—

These results indicate that pathologists still need to make maximum efforts to grade relatively small prostate cancer on biopsy specimens.

Atrophic and Microcystic Limited Prostatic Adenocarcinomas

Atrophic carcinoma and microcystic carcinoma have previously been classified as variants of conventional acinar adenocarcinoma. In this article, we studied 4 cases of atrophic carcinoma and 4 cases of limited microcystic carcinoma. We found an incidence of 0.8% in 250 needle prostatic biopsies and 1.3% of atrophic carcinoma in 150 radical prostatectomies. Microcystic carcinomas were found in 3 prostatectomies (1.2%) and in 1 needle biopsy (0.67%). The useful histological criteria for atrophic carcinoma included the irregular disposition of the glands, infiltrative pattern, "rigid" luminal borders, and intraluminal secretions. Cytological changes included scant cytoplasm, nucleomegaly, hyperchromatic nuclei, and visible nucleoli. The glands of the microcystic carcinoma differ from the benign glands because the malignant ones show a markedly greater dilatation and exhibit rigidity of glandular lumens. In some cases of microcystic carcinoma, the nuclei were flattened, small, and hyperchromatic; therefore, they can be difficult to recognize as malignant.

Prostate cancer: diagnostic criteria and role of immunohistochemistry

The diagnosis of prostate cancer is based on microscopic criteria. Presently, prostate needle biopsy interpretation can be a challenge for the pathologist due to the increased number of specimens with limited amount of suspicious glands and minimal atypia. It is critical for the pathologist to have an organized methodical approach when considering the morphological features enabling a definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer. Although several diagnostic criteria and supportive features have been advocated, only few findings are absolutely specific and diagnostic of prostate cancer. The diagnosis of prostate cancer relies on a combination of architectural and cytological features that are reviewed in detail herein. Infiltrative growth pattern, prominent nucleoli and lack of basal cells are the most useful diagnostic criteria. Perineural invasion, glomerulation and mucinous fibroplasia are pathognomonic features of prostate cancer, although uncommon on small prostate cancer foci. The role of immunohistochemistry in establishing a diagnosis of limited prostate is addressed.

Typing the atypical: Diagnostic issues and predictive markers in suspicious prostate lesions

As much as 5% of prostate biopsies yield findings equivocal for malignancy even for skilled uropathologist; such "grey zone" lesions have been addressed in many ways, although the acronym ASAP (atypical small acinar proliferation) is the most widely used when referring to an atypical focus suspicious, but not diagnostic, for malignancy. Since the introduction of this diagnostic category more than 20 years ago, debate has ensued over its histological characterization and clinical significance. Pathology reporting of ASAP, commonly based on strict morphological criteria and traditional immunohistochemical markers such as basal cell antibodies, has been improved by recent availability of novel immunohistochemical markers such as AMACR and ERG. Further pathological issues, such as the role of pre-analytical variables, number of tissue levels, interobserver variability, and association with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia also play a role in the optimal assessment of ASAP. Apart from diagnostic issues, a major issue is ASAP predictive value for prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. Therefore, attempts have been made to identify clinical and biological parameters that could predict subsequent diagnosis of malignancy as well as define time and modality of repeat biopsy. Finally, pathological features of cancers detected after a previous ASAP diagnosis are compared with those diagnosed at first prostate biopsy.

Minimal (Limited) Pseudohyperplastic Prostatic Adenocarcinoma in Needle Prostatic Biopsy

Background. Study of minimum adenocarcinoma has been done almost exclusively on conventional acinar adenocarcinoma. Pseudohyperplastic adenocarcinoma can be confused with benign lesions because of its well-differentiated appearance and has not been studied when the biopsy shows few malignant glands (limited carcinoma). Methods. We reviewed 94 pseudohyperplastic adenocarcinomas diagnosed in prostatic biopsies for a period of 12 years and selected those measuring less than 1 mm or involving less than 5% of the biopsied tissue. We also reviewed 200 consecutive consultations. Results. Four (4.2%) of the 94 cases were limited pseudohyperplastic adenocarcinomas, and 3 were from consultations. Three of them were mistaken for hyperplastic nodules, prostatic adenosis, or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm. The number of glands varied between 6 and 50 (average 23). Three nodular histological patterns were identified—nodular, adenosis-like, and pseudohyperplastic carcinoma resembling prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. The diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was not related to the number of neoplastic glands. Histological criteria that were useful included: crowded medium to large glands, papillary infoldings, branching glands, straight luminal borders, hyperchromatic nuclei, nucleomegaly, and apparent nucleoli. Areas of transition to conventional acinar adenocarcinoma were useful in recognizing four of these neoplasms, but were barely apparent in 2 of them. Hyperchromatic nuclei were found in all cases, whereas apparent nucleoli and nucleomegaly were only present in 4. Conclusions. The architectural and cytological criteria for limited acinar adenocarcinoma are only partially useful in interpreting minimum pseudohyperplastic adenocarcinomas. Knowledge of the criteria for malignancy in both neoplasms is important in order to avoid underdiagnosis of malignancy.

Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia (Adenosis) of the Prostate: DNA Ploidy Analysis and Immunophenotype

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) of the prostate is a microscopic proliferation of small acini that may be mistaken for adenocarcinoma. Although some data suggest that AAH is associated with adenocarcinoma arising in the transition zone, the clinical significance of this lesion is uncertain. Therefore we studied the DNA ploidy pattern and immunophenotype of AAH as compared with nodular hyperplasia and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma in 23 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, whole-mounted retropubic prostatectomies. Representative sections were immunostained for keratin 34β-E12, chromogranin, bcl-2, c-erbB-2, ki67-MIB1, and factor VIII (microvessel density). DNA ploidy was determined by image analysis and Feul gen-stained sections. There were rare scattered immunoreactive cells for chromogranin, bcl-2, and c-erbB-2 in nodular hyperplasia and AAH (mainly in the basal cell compartment) and in carcinoma. The ki67-MIB1 labeling index was different between nodular hyperplasia and AAH (p<0.001) and carcinoma (p=0.003) but not between AAH and carcinoma (p=0.203). Microvessel density was different between AAH and carcinoma (p=0.001) but not between nodular hyperplasia and AAH (p=0.105) or carcinoma (p=0.0820). All foci of nodular hyperplasia, AAH, and carcinoma were diploid. Ploidy status and our selected panel of antibodies did not discriminate among these 3 entities reliably.

Single foci prostate cancer: current diagnosis and management

Diagnosis of small prostate cancer foci is a real challenge for pathologists and urologists as it carries the risk of false positive or negative diagnosis with clinical consequences. Diagnosis of small prostate cancer foci requires a strict methodological approach which includes a search for major and minor features under low and high magnification. Ambiguous cases can be further clarified with the use of basal cell immunomarkers complemented by a positive indicator of malignancy. Despite the new diagnostic armamentarium, a few cases will continue to remain doubtful and might require an appropriate rebiopsy.

Immunohistochemical evaluation of prostate needle biopsies using saved interval sections vs new recut sections from the block: a prospective comparison

The best method of tissue sampling for performance of immunohistochemistry on prostate needle biopsy tissue sections has not been established. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the usefulness of using saved interval sections vs new recut sections from the paraffin block in the immunohistochemical evaluation of prostate needle biopsy (PNB) material. Seventy (10.3%) of 682 PNB specimens consecutively examined over a 1-year period were evaluated immunohistochemically. Of these cases, 38 were concurrently evaluated using saved interval sections (2 levels) and recut sections. Identical staining results were achieved in 21 cases (55%). Loss of the atypical/ malignant focus of interest was seen in 3 (8%) of the interval sections vs 19 (50%) of the recut sections (P < .0001). The mean linear extent of the foci that were lost in the recut sections (0.75 mm) was significantly less than that of the foci that were not lost in the recuts (1.32 mm; P = .025). Fifteen (79%) of the 19 foci that were lost in the recut sections were 1 mm or less in length vs 7 (37%) of the 19 not lost in the recuts (P = .021). These findings support the practice of cutting and saving 2 interval levels of unstained sections of PNB specimens for potential immunohistochemical evaluation.

What is the pathologist saying? Interpretation of the prostate pathology report

Management of patients presenting with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen levels, or those with previously diagnosed prostate carcinoma, is very much dependent on the pathology report on needle biopsy or radical prostatectomy specimens obtained from these patients. In contrast to a diagnosis of benignity or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, a diagnosis of atypia on needle core biopsy is usually an indication for a repeat biopsy; however, it is important to understand that atypia and other related terms are not specific diagnoses. The pathology report on different prostate specimens with a diagnosis of carcinoma usually includes the Gleason grade and extent of carcinoma among other morphological prognostic and predictive factors. Understanding the significance of these morphological factors and how they are evaluated and incorporated into the pathology report, as well as newer developments in this field, can assist urologists in the interpretation of the pathological findings and ultimately lead to better clinical care.

Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system

There are currently limitations associated with the prostate biopsy procedure, which is the most commonly used method for a definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer. With the use of two-dimensional (2D) transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for needle-guidance in this procedure, the physician has restricted anatomical reference points for guiding the needle to target sites. Further, any motion of the physician's hand during the procedure may cause the prostate to move or deform to a prohibitive extent. These variations make it difficult to establish a consistent reference frame for guiding a needle. We have developed a 3D navigation system for prostate biopsy, which addresses these shortcomings. This system is composed of a 3D US imaging subsystem and a passive mechanical arm to minimize prostate motion. To validate our prototype, a series of experiments were performed on prostate phantoms. The 3D scan of the string phantom produced minimal geometric distortions, and the geometric error of the 3D imaging subsystem was 0.37 mm. The accuracy of 3D prostate segmentation was determined by comparing the known volume in a certified phantom to a reconstructed volume generated by our system and was shown to estimate the volume with less then 5% error. Biopsy needle guidance accuracy tests in agar prostate phantoms showed that the mean error was 2.1 mm and the 3D location of the biopsy core was recorded with a mean error of 1.8 mm. In this paper, we describe the mechanical design and validation of the prototype system using an in vitro prostate phantom. Preliminary results from an ongoing clinical trial show that prostate motion is small with an in-plane displacement of less than 1 mm during the biopsy procedure.

Prostatic Adenocarcinoma, Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Intraductal Carcinoma

Prostate carcinoma (PCa) exhibits a wide range of architectural and cytological features. Gleason grading remains as one of the most powerful histological prognostic parameters. However, it has evolved considerably. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (high-grade PIN) is accepted as a precursor lesion to PCa. Its detection in prostate biopsy is also considered as a risk factor for detecting cancer in subsequent biopsies. Such risk, however, has significantly decreased in recent studies. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) represents the intraductal spread of invasive cancer and constitutes a poor histologic parameter. This article reviews the key histological features of PCa, high-grade PIN and IDC-P, as well as the Gleason grading system that was most recently updated in 2005.

[New markers in prostate biopsies]

The use of serum prostate-specific antigen screening to facilitate early detection of prostate cancer has resulted in a dramatic increase in the number of prostate needle core biopsies which pathologists must examine. This has been accompanied by a strong increase in the number of biopsies with ambiguous lesions, and an unequivocal diagnosis of malignancy is difficult to render, especially in the case of limited foci or in small atypical acinar lesions. When assessing small foci of atypical glands upon needle biopsy, the pathologist searches for differences between the benign glands and atypical glands in terms of usual morphological features and in such cases, immunohistochemical stains for basal cell markers such as 34betaE12 antibody or antibodies directed against cytokeratin 5 and 6 and more recently p63 may be a useful adjuvant to identify basal cells which are typically present in benign glands but absent in prostatic carcinoma. However several benign mimickers of prostate carcinoma, including atrophy, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, nephrogenic adenoma can stain negatively with these antibodies and thus a negative basal cell marker immunostain alone does not exclude a diagnosis of benignancy. Alpha-methyl-coenzyme-A-racemase (AMACR) a new sensitive marker of prostate carcinoma, can be useful in confirming ambiguous lesion suspected for malignancy. Although, as with any immunohistochemical studies, problems exist in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. The aim of this review is to describe the histological features of prostatic carcinoma in case of small focus, and discuss the application of these new prostatic markers in the light of the current literature to highlight the best practice guidelines.

Atypical small acinar proliferation: biopsy artefact or distinct pathological entity?

OBJECTIVE

To determine if atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) represents minimally sampled prostate cancer not fully evaluated on a biopsy or a distinct pathological entity, by examining prostates removed at radical cystectomy, as a finding of ASAP of the prostate on needle-core biopsy is closely associated with the detection of cancer on subsequent biopsy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 65 consecutive cystoprostatectomy specimens taken from June 1990 to March 2004 had prostatic material reviewed by one genitourinary pathologist (S.E.M.). The presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), ASAP, and adenocarcinoma was recorded. Foci of ASAP found in the absence of cancer were assessed with additional sectioning, high-molecular weight keratin (CK903), and alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In all, 24 of 65 specimens (37%) had adenocarcinoma. Of the 41 without cancer, 18 (44%) had neither HGPIN nor ASAP, 14 (34%) had HGPIN alone, three (7%) had ASAP alone (four foci), and six had both HGPIN and ASAP (15%). Two foci of ASAP were not present on any further sectioning. The remaining eight foci all lacked CK903 stain, indicating disruption of the basal cell layer. Of these eight, only five were present for the AMACR stain, all of which were positive. Two of these five developed into a lesion considered cancer on further sectioning.

CONCLUSION

ASAP identified in incidental prostates represented marginally sampled cancer in at least two of 10 foci assessed. The remainder could not be resolved as benign on further evaluation, and remained suspicious for malignancy.

Kinetic fluorescence reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase distinguishes prostate cancer from benign lesions

BACKGROUND

High-throughput gene expression profiling has recently shown that the mRNA for alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (AMACR or P504S) is overexpressed in prostate carcinomas (PCa). Several immunohistochemical studies have reported the usefulness of anti-AMACR/P504S for detecting prostate cancer over the full range of prostate specimens encountered in surgical pathology. We tested real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for specific and sensitive detection of AMACR transcripts as a supplementary measure for discriminating between malignant and benign lesions in prostatic tissues.

METHODS

Total RNA was isolated from snap-frozen chips in 55 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and from frozen sections in 57 prostatectomy cases. The latter were analyzed by an uropathologist (J.K.) and found to contain at least 50% malignant epithelia. Relative quantification of AMACR transcripts was performed by RT-PCR using hybridization probes for detection and PBGD for normalization.

RESULTS

Normalized AMACR transcript levels showed an average 3.75-fold increase in 57 prostate carcinomas cases when compared to 55 cases of BPH (p<0.0001). A 85.6% specificity and 64.9% sensitivity can be achieved if the cutoff is set at 12.95. AMACR expression levels among PCa cases were not statistically associated with the tumor and lymph node stage, the grading, the surgical margins, the Gleason score or progression.

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrates the usefulness of quantitative AMACR-mRNA transcript detection in prostatic tissues as an alternative to immunological staining techniques. Since the latter clearly predominate in the laboratory routine, PCR-based detection of AMACR has the potential to gain widespread acceptance as a suitable future tool for monitoring prostate cancer patients.

Stratified epithelium in prostatic adenocarcinoma: a mimic of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

Typically glands of prostatic adenocarcinoma have a single cell lining, although stratification can be seen in invasive carcinomas with a cribriform architecture, including ductal carcinoma. The presence and diagnostic significance of stratified cells within non-cribriform carcinomatous prostatic glands has not been well addressed. The histomorphological features and immunohistochemical profile of cases of non-cribriform prostatic adenocarcinoma with stratified malignant glandular epithelium were analyzed. These cases were identified from needle biopsy cases from the consultation files of one of the authors and from a review of 150 consecutive in-house needle biopsy cases of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed utilizing antibodies reactive against high molecular weight cytokeratin (34betaE12), p63 and alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR). A total of 8 cases were identified, including 2 from the 150 consecutive in-house cases (1.3%). In 4 cases, the focus with glands having stratified epithelium was the sole carcinomatous component in the biopsy, while such a component represented 5-30% of the invasive carcinoma seen elsewhere in the remaining cases. The main attribute in all these foci was the presence of glandular profiles lined by several layers of epithelial cells with cytological and architectural features resembling flat or tufted high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, but lacking basal cells as confirmed by negative 34betaE12 and/or p63 immunostains in all cases. The AMACR staining profile of the stratified foci was variable, with 4 foci showing positivity, and 3 foci being negative, including two cases that displayed AMACR positivity in adjacent non-stratified prostatic adenocarcinoma. Prostatic adenocarcinoma with stratified malignant glandular epithelium can be identified in prostate needle biopsy samples harboring non-cribriform prostatic adenocarcinoma and resembles glands with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. These 'PIN-like' carcinomas can present in pure form. Recognition of this pattern of prostatic adenocarcinoma is necessary to correctly diagnose such cases as invasive carcinoma.

Current prostate biopsy interpretation: criteria for cancer, atypical small acinar proliferation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and use of immunostains

CONTEXT

The past decade has brought major changes in prostate biopsy sampling, interpretation, and reporting.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize current information on diagnostic decision making, Gleason grading, "atypical" diagnoses, and use of immunostaining.

DATA SOURCES

Pertinent literature from 1985 to 2005 is reviewed, emphasizing recent findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis begins by evaluating a focus of atypical single-cell layer lined acini according to the 3 minimal diagnostic criteria for cancer: an infiltrative pattern, nuclear enlargement and hyperchromasia, and prominent nucleoli. The Gleason score and linear extent or percent of each core containing cancer should be reported. Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy designates foci that have either qualitative or quantitative limitations in atypia precluding a definite cancer diagnosis. It has about a 3% incidence as an isolated finding. Contemporary studies indicate a 39% predictive value for cancer on repeat biopsy. Isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia has a 3% to 14% incidence and predicts cancer on repeat biopsy in 23% of cases. Immunostaining for a marker of benign prostate (cytoplasmic keratin 34betaE12 or nuclear p63) and a marker of cancer (alpha-methylacyl coA racemase, clone P504S) may or may not resolve atypical small acinar proliferation diagnoses. Performance of 34betaE12 and P504S immunostains resolved 76% of atypical small acinar proliferation diagnoses per consensus of 3 urologic pathologists studied; a technical limitation is preservation of the focus in question on the levels used for immunostaining.

Detection of prostate cancer by alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) in needle biopsy specimens previously reported as negative for malignancy

AIMS

To investigate the possibility of detecting small focal prostatic cancer by alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (AMACR)/P504S immunohistochemistry on needle biopsy specimens that were previously interpreted as negative for carcinoma on routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections.

METHODS

Prostate needle biopsy specimens (n = 793) previously interpreted as benign prostatic tissue by conventional morphology from 239 patients with prostatic cancer diagnosed in other biopsy cores taken at the same biopsy session were stained with the P504S monoclonal antibody. If a biopsy specimen stained positively, two pathologists independently reviewed the original corresponding H&E-stained sections to establish the malignant diagnosis.

RESULTS

Eighty-four of the 793 biopsy specimens showed AMACR immunoreactivity; nine of these (9/793, 1.1%) contained previously unrecognized small focal prostatic carcinoma (Gleason 6, N = 8; Gleason 8, N = 1). Six of nine (67%) carcinomas showed foamy/pseudohyperplastic (N = 3) or atrophic (N = 3) features. Additionally, five biopsy specimens (5/793, 0.6%) with positive AMACR staining that did not meet the criteria for prostatic cancer on the original H&E slides were considered to be atypia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we found a 1.1% false-negative rate for carcinoma on routine H&E-stained sections. AMACR immunohistochemical staining has shown the ability to improve detection of small focal prostatic carcinoma that could be missed by conventional histological examination.

Minute Foci of Gleason Score 8-10 on Prostatic Needle Biopsy

Prostatic needle biopsies showing high-grade cancer typically contain abundant tumor. However, the histologic features of a minute focus of high-grade cancer on biopsy have not been well studied. A total of 100 cases with a single minute focus (< or = 1 mm) of Gleason score (GS) 8-10 adenocarcinoma were identified from a large consultative service, systematically studied, and compared with the submitting institutions' provisional diagnoses. The mean size of the minute foci was 0.52 mm. A total of 29 cases were GS 8 with cribriform glands (n = 15), poorly formed glands (n = 6), fused glands (n = 3), or combinations of the three (n = 5). A total of 38 cases were GS 9, with: single cells and poorly formed glands (n = 20); extremely poorly formed glands/borderline pattern 4/5 (n = 4); combinations of single cells, sheets, or nests of cells mixed with glands that were either poorly formed, cribriform, or fused (n = 14). A total of 33 cases were GS 10, with single cells (n = 23), single cells with nests (n = 9), or single cells with sheets of cells (n = 1). A total of 69 foci were located adjacent to benign glands, while 31 were on the edge or at the end of the core. Perineural invasion was observed in only 1 case. A total of 72 cases showed moderate to abundant amphophilic cytoplasm. Frequent prominent nucleoli (n = 11), mitoses (n = 8), and apoptotic bodies (n = 11) were infrequently observed. Of 59 cases with known provisional diagnoses, 46 were diagnosed as atypical (n = 37) or as cancer with GS < 8 (n = 9). Pathologists must be attuned to the complex and varied architectural patterns seen in low-volume, high-grade prostate cancer as its diagnosis has both important prognostic and therapeutic implications.

Immunohistochemical Stains for p63 and α-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase, Versus a Cocktail Comprising Both, in the Diagnosis of Prostatic Carcinoma

The diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma and especially minimal prostatic carcinoma can sometimes be challenging on needle core biopsy and occasionally immunohistochemistry is an aid in the diagnosis. Immunostains, such as those directed against the basal cell marker p63 and, more recently, employing antibodies reactive with alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), can be useful in this situation. The aim of this investigation was to assess the diagnostic utility of a p63/AMACR antibody cocktail and compare the staining pattern it produces with that using the individual antibodies alone. A retrospective review of 31 consecutive radical prostatectomy specimens and 150 prostate needle biopsy samples was performed to select histologic sections showing foci of prostatic carcinoma and/or minimal prostatic carcinoma, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), as well as common benign mimickers of prostatic carcinoma, to include atrophy and basal cell hyperplasia, especially with prominent nucleoli. Serial histologic sections from the corresponding paraffin blocks were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and by immunostains for p63, AMACR, and a prediluted antibody cocktail comprising both. The diagnostic utility of the cocktail was assessed, and the staining characteristics it produced were compared with those using the individual immunostains. In 430 foci, the cocktail produced a p63 staining profile identical to that using the single p63 antibody. Distinction of the nuclear p63 signal from the cytoplasmic AMACR localization was readily accomplished. There was an excellent agreement (kappa=0.91; P<0.0001) between the AMACR staining profile using the cocktail and the single AMACR antibody alone. The cocktail was very useful in highlighting prostatic carcinoma associated with HGPIN, flat and cribriform HGPIN, and distorted foci of minimal prostatic carcinoma. These data indicate that use of a p63/AMACR cocktail is essentially equivalent to use of each antibody separately for immunohistochemical confirmation of a diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsy. This cocktail would be of diagnostic utility when only limited tissue is available for immunohistochemical evaluation of small, diagnostically difficult foci in prostate needle biopsy tissue.

Diagnostic utility of alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) on prostate needle biopsy

Alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (AMACR), also known as P504S, was identified by the analysis of cDNA library subtraction in conjunction with high throughput microarray screening from prostate tissue and has been proven to be one of the very few biomarkers that can distinguish cancer from benign cells with high sensitivity and specificity for prostate carcinoma. It is a successful example of the translation of molecular findings into clinical practice. This review focuses on the study of AMACR (P504S) expression in small focal prostate cancer and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) on needle biopsies and emphasizes the utility of AMACR (P504S) in routine surgical pathology practice. We also discuss the potential pitfalls and caveats in the interpretation of immunostaining results.

Practice patterns of clinicians following isolated diagnoses of atypical small acinar proliferation on prostate biopsy specimens

CONTEXT

The controversial diagnostic term atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) has gained some acceptance as a legitimate way for pathologists to describe minute foci of small prostatic acini that raise the suspicion of carcinoma but that fail to attain the requisite diagnostic threshold for carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the practice patterns of clinicians following this diagnosis and to identify clinicopathologic parameters that may be of influence.

DESIGN

All cases with a diagnosis of ASAP on a prostate biopsy specimen during a 7-year period were retrieved from our computerized database. Cases with concurrent diagnoses of adenocarcinoma and/or prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia were excluded. Medical and pathologic records for the remaining patients were reviewed and correlated with pathologic data.

RESULTS

Fifty-five (2.8%) of 1964 prostate biopsies performed during this period provided the diagnosis of ASAP, of which 36 met our study criteria. The average age of the patients was 65 years, and the mean total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 6.41 ng/mL. The rate of biopsy subsequent to an ASAP diagnosis was 67% (24/36), and the mean duration to subsequent biopsy was 246 days (median, 182 days; range, 71-728 days). Adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 9 (38%) of 24 specimens taken during the subsequent biopsy. Neither age nor PSA level significantly predicted a greater likelihood for subsequent biopsy. Additionally, among patients who received a subsequent biopsy, the aforementioned parameters were not predictive of carcinoma in the second biopsy. The average number of cores following an ASAP diagnosis (6 cores) did not differ significantly from the average at initial biopsy (7.18 cores, P =.64). Pathology report characteristics, such as inclusion of a descriptive note or explicit recommendation of a second biopsy, did not significantly increase the likelihood of a subsequent biopsy. Reasons for a delay in or lack of a subsequent biopsy following an ASAP diagnosis were miscellaneous and attributable to the patients in most cases.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of ASAP generates a subsequent biopsy in two thirds of cases after an average duration of 246 days. Although closer follow-up may be recommended based on the high rate of association with carcinoma on subsequent biopsy, we found no evidence that any delays in or lack of a subsequent biopsy is attributable to a lack of understanding on the part of urologists of the significance of the diagnosis.

WITHDRAWN:Epidemiology of prostate cancer and its precursors

Ahead of Print article withdrawn by publisher.

Alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S): overview and potential uses in diagnostic pathology as applied to prostate needle biopsies

The diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma remains dependent on the recognition of basic haematoxylin and eosin criteria. The discovery of alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase/P504S (AMACR/P504S) overexpression in prostate cancer represents a triumph of high throughput microarray technology, and is a powerful demonstration of how this methodology can be used to facilitate the rapid development of diagnostically relevant antibodies. Immunohistochemistry with anti-AMACR/P504S is useful for detecting prostate cancer in the full range of prostate specimens encountered in surgical pathology, be they needle biopsies, transurethral resection of prostate chips, or prostatectomies. In particular, studies to date with AMACR/P504S clearly demonstrate the ability of this marker to support a diagnosis of malignancy in prostate needle biopsies. This is particularly true when it is combined with negative staining for a basal cell marker, such as 34betaE12 or p63. Although it has limitations with respect to sensitivity and specificity, AMACR/P504S will no doubt become a standard adjunctive stain used by pathologists seeking to reach a definitive diagnosis in prostate biopsies considered to be atypical, but not diagnostic of malignancy on haematoxylin and eosin sections alone.

The reporting of prostate cancer on needle biopsy: prognostic and therapeutic implications and the utility of diagnostic markers

Prostate needle biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosing prostate cancer. Prostate cancer on needle biopsy can be evaluated by numerous techniques of quantifying tumour extent, Gleason score, and the presence of perineural invasion (PNI). These modalities can help clinicians in assessing the risk of extraprostatic disease, progression likelihood, and in helping men with prostate cancer choose among therapeutic options. This review details the information that should be included in the routine pathology report. Recent advances in molecular biology of prostate carcinogenesis have identified many molecular markers for prostate cancer. While several are extremely promising as diagnostic immunohistochemical markers, other prognostic markers are not yet ready to be used in routine practice until they are validated by large prospective studies.

Expression and diagnostic utility of alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (P504S) in foamy gland and pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer

Foamy gland and pseudohyperplastic carcinomas are two uncommon variants of prostate cancer and often pose diagnostic challenges on needle biopsies. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA-racemase (AMACR) is a recently discovered tumor marker whose expression is significantly upregulated in prostate cancer. However, the original works only studied ordinary prostate cancer without reference to specific morphologic variants. Therefore, the expression and diagnostic utility of AMACR in specific variants of prostate cancer are unknown. In addition, two different antibodies, one monoclonal and one polyclonal, were used in the previous studies. The goal of this study is to examine the expression pattern and diagnostic utility of AMACR in foamy gland and pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer and to compare the diagnostic utility of the two anti-AMACR antibodies in the same prostate needle biopsy series. Prostate cancer with foamy gland or pseudohyperplastic features was retrieved from the Johns Hopkins Hospital Surgical Pathology file. Thirty needle biopsies harboring prostate cancer with foamy gland features and 17 needle biopsies harboring prostate cancer with pseudohyperplastic features were available for this study. Immunohistochemistry for AMACR was performed with two antibodies, a monoclonal one (P504S) and a polyclonal one (AMACR-p), using previously published protocols. Immunohistochemistry for high molecular weight cytokeratin and p63 was performed to confirm the cancer diagnosis. The AMACR staining intensity was graded as negative, weak, moderate, and strong. Only the staining that was significantly stronger than that of background benign glands was considered positive. A total of 68% and 62% of foamy gland prostate cancer was positive for AMACR with P504S and AMACR-p antibodies, respectively. A total of 77% and 70% of pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer was positive for AMACR with P504S and AMACR-p antibodies, respectively. Staining was often heterogeneous with different staining intensities within the same lesion. The mean percentage of stained glands in positive cases was 74.4% (range 25-100%) with P504S and 78.9% (range 20-100%) with AMACR-p in foamy gland prostate cancer and 91% (range 10-100%) with P504S, and 86.7% (range 10-100%) with AMACR-p in pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer. Seven foci of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia present in the study cases were all positive for AMACR. The two antibodies were not statistically different in their sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, AMACR is potentially a useful diagnostic marker for foamy gland and pseudohyperplastic prostate cancer in the following setting. When the pathologist favors the diagnosis of these variants of cancer on routine stained sections and stains for basal cells are negative, yet still a definitive diagnosis of cancer is difficult because of the cancers' deceptively benign appearance, positive staining for AMACR can provide the additional confidence to establish a definitive malignant diagnosis. The major caveat in the interpretation of positive staining is that high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia cannot be in the differential diagnosis.

Minimal focus of adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy: clinicopathological correlations

AIMS

To establish the clinicopathological features of minimal volume prostate adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy.

METHODS

Twenty four cases of minimal adenocarcinoma diagnosed on prostate biopsy and treated by radical prostatectomy were reviewed.

RESULTS

The major microscopic criteria were nuclear enlargement (22 of 24), infiltrative pattern (19 of 24), prominent nucleoli (19 of 24), intraluminal eosinophilic secretions (15 of 24), and high grade intraepithelial neoplasia associated (11 of 24). Sixteen of 24 cases were assigned a Gleason score 6 on biopsy. When the whole gland was assessed, 22 of these tumours were localised to the prostate (stage pT2), and only two cases were stage pT3.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal focus of adenocarcinoma on prostate biopsy is not an uncommon finding. It is usually an intermediate grade and localised stage neoplasm.

Diagnosing minimal adenocarcinoma on prostate needle biopsy by real-time dynamic telepathology through the internet: evaluation of an economic technology for remote consultation

Computer-aided telepathology was introduced about 10 years ago, but has not yet met with worldwide acceptance. Recently, the internet has been used for image transmission in telepathology. We set up an easily assembled system comprising a common microscope, a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera, a personal computer, and a commercial internet surveillance program with internet accessibility. The consultant then views the real-time images using a common web browser at the remote site. The purpose of the study was to assess the ability of the system to transmit images of sufficient quality to achieve high concordance between the diagnoses made at the home base and at the remote site. We chose cases of minimal adenocarcinoma on prostate needle biopsy, because these lesions are liable to be overlooked and, even if discovered, are subject to differences in interpretation due to their limited size and subtle histologic changes. One hundred prostate needle biopsy specimens, including 45 minimal adenocarcinoma, 11 atypical small acinar proliferation, and 44 benign lesions, were tested. Two pathologists, unaware of the final diagnoses, were recruited to provide intra- and interinstitutional consultation. The overall concordance rates between telepathology diagnoses and final diagnoses were 97% and 94% for the two pathologists, respectively. Our results demonstrate that this method is effective for teleconsultation. Similar systems using the internet can be easily set up by ordinary pathology laboratories to facilitate remote consultation.