Application of SELDI-TOF-MS Coupled With an Artificial Neural Network Model to the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer

Applications of machine learning in the chemical pathology laboratory

Machine learning (ML) is an area of artificial intelligence that provides computer programmes with the capacity to autodidact and learn new skills from experience, without continued human programming. ML algorithms can analyse large data sets quickly and accurately, by supervised and unsupervised learning techniques, to provide classification and prediction value outputs. The application of ML to chemical pathology can potentially enhance efficiency at all phases of the laboratory's total testing process. Our review will broadly discuss the theoretical foundation of ML in laboratory medicine. Furthermore, we will explore the current applications of ML to diverse chemical pathology laboratory processes, for example, clinical decision support, error detection in the preanalytical phase, and ML applications in gel-based image analysis and biomarker discovery. ML currently demonstrates exploratory applications in chemical pathology with promising advancements, which have the potential to improve all phases of the chemical pathology total testing pathway.

Complementarity of Matrix- and Nanostructure-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Approaches

In recent years, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) has become the main tool for the study of biological macromolecules, such as protein nano-machines, especially in the determination of their molecular masses, structure, and post-translational modifications. A key role in the classical process of desorption and ionization of the sample is played by a matrix, usually a low-molecular weight weak organic acid. Unfortunately, the interpretation of mass spectra in the mass range of below m/z 500 is difficult, and hence the analysis of low molecular weight compounds in a matrix-assisted system is an analytical challenge. Replacing the classical matrix with nanomaterials, e.g., silver nanoparticles, allows improvement of the selectivity and sensitivity of spectrometric measurement of biologically important small molecules. Nowadays, the nanostructure-assisted laser desorption/ionization (NALDI) approach complements the classic MALDI in the field of modern bioanalytics. In particular, the aim of this work is to review the recent advances in MALDI and NALDI approaches.

The value of surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry at the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Numbers of studies used surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) to find novel serum biomarkers for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is arguable whether the SELDI technique has its value of diagnostic accuracy for NSCLC. The purpose of our study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of SELDI-TOF-MS for diagnosing NSCLC. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Pub Med, EMBASE, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the China Academic Journals Full-text Database, and the Chinese Scientific Journals Database were searched systematically for potential studies. Reference lists of included studies and review articles were also reviewed. All studies that reported data on patients with a confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC and that compared the measurement of SELDI-TOF-MS with pathology standard were considered for inclusion. 11 studies were included in the systematic review. The ranges of the diagnostic value of SELDI-TOF-MS for NSCLC were as follows: sensitivity (SEN) was 0.70~1.00; specificity (SPE) was 0.68~1.00; positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 2.23~23.14; negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.04~0.43; and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 5.17~621.0, respectively. SELDI-TOF-MS showed high accuracy in identifying NSCLC, and could be a potential screening tool for diagnosing NSCLC patients.

Potential role of proteomics in the diagnosis of lymphoma: a meta-analysis

Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF-MS) has been approved for identifying biomarkers and diagnosing many diseases such as lymphomas. It is arguable whether the SELDI technique has its value of diagnostic accuracy for lymphomas. The purpose of our study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of SELDI-TOF-MS for diagnosing lymphomas. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Pub Med, EMBASE, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the China Academic Journals Full-text Database, and the Chinese Scientific Journals Database were searched systematically for potential studies. Reference lists of included studies and review articles were also reviewed. All studies that reported data on patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lymphomas and that compared the measurement of SELDI-TOF-MS with pathology standard were considered for inclusion. Eleven studies were included in the systematic review. The ranges of the diagnostic value of SELDI-TOF-MS for lymphoma were as follows: sensitivity (SEN) was 0.69-0.96; specificity (SPE) was 0.70-1.00; positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 2.99-96.09; negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.04-0.35; and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 18.13-1250.71, respectively. Further, we analysed serum samples as a subgroup, and the pooled endpoints were as follows: pooled SEN was 0.89 (0.85-0.91); pooled SPE was 0.91 (0.88-0.93); pooled PLR was 12.35 (5.36-28.44); pooled NLR was 0.13 (0.09-0.20); and pooled DOR was 101.04 (39.57-258.04), respectively. SELDI-TOF-MS showed high accuracy in identifying lymphoma and could be a useful screening tool for diagnosing lymphoma patients.