Randomized salvage therapy with saquinavir-ritonavir versus saquinavir-nelfinavir for highly protease inhibitor-experienced HIV-infected patients

Use of observational data in evaluating treatments: antiretroviral therapy and HIV

Observational data are increasingly used in various therapeutic areas to evaluate the use, effectiveness and side effects of new treatments. Whilst randomized clinical trials remain the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of new agents, they have a number of limitations for HIV, including the limited number of combinations that are compared and the costs of long-term follow-up. Observational data from seroconverter and clinical cohorts have been used to compare the short- and longer-term effectiveness of different therapy combinations and to evaluate the longer-term risks associated with antiretroviral therapy. Furthermore, they provide the opportunity to evaluate the relative success of more complex patterns of therapy, such as sequencing of different regimens over time. However, because of the nature of these data, a number of potential biases may arise which can influence interpretation.

Traitement antirétroviral et risque cardio-vasculaire

Current antiretroviral therapy protocols enable long-term survival of HIV-infected patients, decreasing the risk of infectious complications. Three classes of anti-HIV treatments are available. With longer survival, unusual cardiovascular complications related to iatrogenic biological anomalies (dyslipidemia and impaired glucose tolerance) have appeared among this young population which is exposed to usual risk factors of atherosclerosis. Antiretroviral therapies are suspected to cause these complications, inducing maturity-onset diabetes in 4 to 20% of patients, impaired glucose tolerance in 15 to 60%, hypertriglyceridemia in 15 to 74% depending on the survey, and hypercholesterolemia in 20 to 60%, especially in case of associated lipodystrophia. A lipid battery including total cholesterol, HDL, and triglycerides, and 12-h fasting blood glucose should be obtained before initiating antiretroviral therapy. Any anomalous finding should be followed carefully with regular surveillance every 3 to 6 months and search for other causes of secondary dyslipidemia. In the event of casual and persisting elevation of LDL-cholesterol levels, a statin treatment can be introduced. For secondary prevention, irrespective of the context, recommendations currently merge with the consensus applying to the general population. These patients require careful surveillance of cardiovascular risk factors and a specific care in addition to treatment of their immunodeficiency.

Effectiveness of Antiretroviral Therapy after Protease Inhibitor Failure: An Analytic Overview

To examine effectiveness of subsequent antiretroviral therapy (ART), studies published during the period of 1 January 1997 through 31 May 2003 involving patients who had failed a protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen and were switched to another regimen were reviewed. Twelve studies describing 1197 patients were analyzed. A total of 38% of patients had human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA levels of <500 copies/mL at 24 weeks. After adjustment for baseline HIV RNA level, the rate of virologic suppression ranged from 16% for patients switching drugs within previously failed classes to 54% for nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-naive patients switched to boosted PI- and NNRTI-containing regimens. ART regimens in patients who failed a PI-containing regimen provided virologic suppression only in a few patients. The best response was seen in NNRTI-naive patients receiving NNRTI- and boosted PI-containing regimens. New approaches are needed to achieve better suppression in pretreated HIV-infected patients.

Comparison of the efficacy, safety and predictive value of HIV genotyping using distinct ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors

The pharmacokinetic profile of protease inhibitors (PI) is improved significantly by adding low doses of ritonavir (rit). The use of rit-boosted PI allows the reduction of pill burden, improves dosing schedules and enhances drug exposure, all factors that have been associated with a greater benefit of antiretroviral therapy. All patients receiving rit 100 mg bid together with saquinavir (SQV) soft gel 1000 mg bid, indinavir (IDV) 800 mg bid or lopinavir (LPV) 400 mg bid, as part of a salvage regimen, were retrospectively analyzed in a reference institution. Only subjects who had failed all three antiretroviral drug families in the past were included. A total of 299 patients were included in the study (121 on SQV, 62 on IDV and 116 on LPV). Mean plasma HIV-RNA and CD4 lymphocyte counts at baseline were less favourable in the LPV group (4.4 logs, 275 cells/microl) with respect to SQV (4.3 logs, 355 cells/microl) and IDV (3.7 logs, 409 cells/microl) groups (P < 0.05). The proportion of subjects experiencing virological success (attainment of either < 500 HIV-RNA copies/ml or > 1 log reduction) in an intent-to-treat analysis at 24 weeks was 61% with LPV, 49% with SQV and 48% with IDV. The CD4 count increased 48% with SQV, 45% with IDV and 37% with LPV. The proportion of subjects discontinuing therapy due to adverse events was higher using IDV (27%) than using either SQV (11%) or LPV (6%) (P < 0.05). The presence of < 5 or > 5 PI resistance mutations at baseline discriminated significantly better who would respond to therapy in all instances: 90 vs. 48% with LPV, 95 vs. 21% with SQV and 90 vs. 23% with IDV. The efficacy of rit-boosted PI combinations is greatly influenced by the extent of baseline PI resistance. Differences, not only in potency, but mainly in tolerance may favour the selection of one dual PI combination over others.