Potential Drugs for the Treatment of COVID-19: Synthesis, Brief History and Application

Coronaviruses (CoVs) belonging to the Betacoronavirus group, an unusually large RNA genome, are characterized by club-like spikes that project from their surface. An outbreak of a novel coronavirus 2019 (nCOVID-19) showing a unique replication strategy and infection has posed a significant threat to international health and the economy around the globe. Scientists around the world are investigating few previously used clinical drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. This review provides synthesis and mode of action of recently investigated drugs like Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Selamectin, Remdesivir, Baricitinib, Darunavir, Favipiravir, Lopinavir/ritonavir and Mefloquine hydrochloride that constitute an option for COVID-19 treatment.

Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma lopinavir concentrations and viral response in virologically suppressed patients switching to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy once daily

BACKGROUND

Lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) monotherapy is used in selected virologically suppressed HIV-infected patients. Some would prefer a once-daily (OD) dose instead of the usual twice-daily dose to favour adherence. However, trough concentrations of the drug in blood and particularly in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may not be adequate to maintain viral suppression.

METHODS

Prospective, open-label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LPV/r monotherapy OD. HIV-1-infected patients, virologically suppressed for at least 6 months were enrolled. HIV viral load (VL) was determined at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 48. Lumbar puncture was performed in a subgroup of patients to evaluate CSF VL and CSF LPV concentrations.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients were included. At week 48, 85.7% (n=18) showed viral suppression (VL<40 copies/ml). Two patients had viral failure (9.5%) and a third was withdrawn from the study because of gastrointestinal symptoms. Nine patients were enrolled in the substudy. CSF VL was <40 copies/ml in all cases. Median (range) LPV concentration was 9.78 ng/ml (1.93-78.3) in CSF and 1,970 (154-16,700) ng/ml in plasma; the CSF/plasma ratio was 0.004 (0.001-0.186).

CONCLUSIONS

In this small pilot study, LPV/r monotherapy OD maintained plasma HIV RNA suppression at 48 weeks in most patients, with no cases of CSF viral escape. However, CSF LPV concentrations were close to the 50% inhibitory concentration threshold in several patients; hence, this intervention should be avoided in patients with advanced immune suppression and/or those individuals presenting with significant comorbidities such as hepatitis C coinfection.

Hepatitis C virus infection in patients with HIV-1: epidemiology, natural history and management

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver diseases have contributed to increased morbidity and mortality in HIV-1-infected individuals in the era of effective antiretroviral therapy. HCV transmission patterns have changed among the HIV co-infected population during the last decade, with acute HCV infection emerging worldwide. HIV infection accelerates the progression of HCV-related liver diseases and consequently cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the current standard treatment of HCV infection with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin results in only a limited viral response. Furthermore, cumbersome pill regimens, antiretroviral related hepatotoxicity, and drug interactions of HCV and HIV regimens complicate therapy strategies. Fortunately, in the near future, new direct-acting anti-HCV agents will widen therapeutic options for HCV/HIV co-infection. Liver transplantation is also gradually accepted as a therapeutic option for end stage liver disease of HCV/HIV co-infected patients.

Durability of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in individuals with viral load ≤50 copies/ml in an observational setting

BACKGROUND

The main objective is to evaluate the efficacy and durability of lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy (LPV/r-MT) in virologically controlled HIV-positive individuals switching from combination antiretroviral therapy (cART).

METHODS

Criteria to be included in this observational study were to have initiated for the first time LPV/r-MT after ≥2 consecutive HIV RNA≤50 copies/ml achieved on a ≥3-drug-including regimen. The main end points were time to virological rebound (VR; defined in two ways: time of first of two consecutive viral load [VL]>50 and >200 copies/ml), time to discontinuation/intensification and time to experience either a single VL>200 copies/ml or discontinuation/intensification (treatment failure [TF]). Individuals' follow-up accrued from the date of starting LPV/r-MT to event or last available VL. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

A total of 228 individuals were included: median age 46 years (IQR 40-50), 36% females, 36% intravenous drug users and 25% HCV-coinfected. Median CD4(+) T-cell count at nadir was 215 cell/mm(3) (IQR 116-336) and at baseline was 615 cell/mm(3) (IQR 436-768). By 36 months after switching to LPV/r-MT, the proportion of individuals with VR (confirmed VL>200 copies/ml) was 11% and with TF was 35%. In the multivariable Cox model the factors associated with a lower risk of TF was the duration of viral suppression <50 copies/ml prior to baseline (ARH=0.92; 95% CI 0.85, 0.99; P=0.024, per 6 months longer) and having LPV/r as part of last cART (ARH=0.45; 95% CI 0.21, 0.95; P=0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

In daily clinical practice, we confirm a relatively safe approach of treatment simplification to LPV-MT in a selected population with long-lasting virological control.