Scopolamine patch withdrawal syndrome

Transdermal Scopolamine for Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder

Conventional antidepressants are useful in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) but are limited by their delayed onset of action and lack of adequate therapeutic response in approximately one-third of patients. This has led to a quest for faster-acting and more effective antidepressants. Scopolamine exhibits rapid antidepressant effects when administered intravenously. We report a case of a female with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) who responded to transdermal scopolamine. She had a rapid (within three days) and sustained (119 days) response to transdermal scopolamine. Further research into the use of transdermal scopolamine for the treatment of depression is recommended.

Evaluating drug withdrawal syndrome risks through food and drug administration adverse event reporting system: a comprehensive disproportionality analysis

Objective

The study aims to identify the drugs associated with drug withdrawal syndrome in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and estimate their risks of causing withdrawal syndrome.

Methods

All the data were collected from FAERS from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2023. Disproportionality analyses of odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reported ratio were conducted to identify potential adverse effects signal of drug withdrawal syndrome.

Results

A total of 94,370 reports related to withdrawal syndrome from the data. The top 50 drugs with most frequency reported were analyzed, and 29 exhibited a positive signal based on the number of reports. The top three categories of drugs with positive signals included opioids, antidepressant drugs and antianxiety drugs. Other classifications included opioid antagonist, muscle relaxant, antiepileptic drugs, analgesics, hypnotic sedative drugs and antipsychotic drugs.

Conclusion

Our analysis of FAERS data yielded a comprehensive list of drugs associated with withdrawal syndrome. This information is vital for healthcare professionals, including doctors and pharmacists, as it aids in better recognition and management of withdrawal symptoms in patients undergoing treatment with these medications.

Pharmacological Treatment of Acute Unilateral Vestibulopathy: A Review

There have been few investigations on the epidemiology, etiology, and medical management of acute unilateral vestibulopathy (AUV). Short-term pharmaceutical resolutions include vestibular symptomatic suppressants, anti-emetics, and some cause-based therapies. Anticholinergics, phenothiazines, antihistamines, antidopaminergics, benzodiazepines, and calcium channel antagonists are examples of vestibular suppressants. Some of these medications may show their effects through multiple mechanisms. In contrast, N-acetyl-L-leucine, Ginkgo biloba, and betahistine improve central vestibular compensation. Currently, AUV pathophysiology is poorly understood. Diverse hypotheses have previously been identified which have brought about some causal treatments presently used. According to some publications, acute administration of anti-inflammatory medications may have a deleterious impact on both post-lesional functional recovery and endogenous adaptive plasticity processes. Thus, some authors do not recommend the use of corticosteroids in AUV. Antivirals are even more contentious in the context of AUV treatment. Although vascular theories have been presented, no verified investigations employing anti-clotting or vasodilator medications have been conducted. There are no standardized treatment protocols for AUV to date, and the pharmacological treatment of AUV is still questionable. This review addresses the most current developments and controversies in AUV medical treatment.