Urodynamic findings and urologic management of central cord syndrome

Purpose:

Central cord syndrome is the most common incomplete spinal cord injury, although urodynamic data on this subset of patients is lacking. We aim to determine the typical urodynamic features associated with this condition.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing urodynamic studies in a tertiary spinal cord unit between 2014 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed to identify those with central cord syndrome. Charts were evaluated for demographics, spinal cord injury classification, symptoms, urodynamic parameters and treatment. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

Results:

A total of 131 consecutive patients undergoing urodynamic studies were reviewed and 33 were identified with central cord syndrome. Mean age was 46 years and 91% were male. The predominant spinal cord injury classification was American Spinal Injury Association D (52%). Overall, 94% (31/33) reported volitional voiding and normal bladder sensation. Video-urodynamics demonstrated neurogenic detrusor overactivity in 70% (23/33) of patients, with 15% (5/33) demonstrating leakage with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and 21% (7/33) having reflex emptying. In total, 94% (31/33) of patients had normal compliance, 42% (14/33) of patients had detrusor sphincter or bladder neck dyssynergia and 60% (20/33) had an alteration to their management plan following urodynamic study.

Conclusion:

There is discordance between subjective patient-reported symptoms and objective urodynamic findings. About two-fifths of patients may have a potentially unsafe urodynamic bladder profile and urodynamics studies resulted in a change in bladder management in the majority of patients. Urodynamic assessment of patients with central cord syndrome is essential to determine which patients require further intervention.

Level of evidence:

Not applicable for this multicentre audit.

Hyperextension injury of the cervical spine with central cord syndrome

PURPOSE

Traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS) is the most commonly encountered type of incomplete spinal cord injury. TCCS typically occurs in patients over the age of 50 with a narrow spinal canal and follows an acute hyperextension injury of the cervical spine. Here, we report on the demographics of TCCS patients, their clinical course and outcomes, and the factors that may have influenced these outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective folder review of patients who presented to our facility between January 2004 and December 2008 following hyperextension injury of the cervical spine and with the clinical manifestations of a central cord syndrome. Patient details were obtained from the acute spinal cord injury register at Groote Schuur Hospital and the patient folders, radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging films were reviewed. Predetermined data points were identified, tabulated and analysed, with only information from the injury-related admission being included.

RESULTS

An ASIA motor score of ≥60 on admission or discharge correlated with an 80 % chance of being able to walk at discharge from hospital. An ASIA motor score of ≤50 on admission correlated with an 80 % chance of not walking at discharge. An ASIA motor score of ≤50 at discharge meant a patient was not only unable to walk, but required placement in a spinal injury rehabilitation centre. Further, if a patient had a cervical spinal canal diameter of ≥8 mm they had a 50 % chance of clinical improvement and nearly 80 % chance of a functional outcome.

CONCLUSION

The Groote Schuur Hospital patient population differs from the international norm, particularly with respect to age and mechanism of injury. The ASIA motor score and cervical spine canal diameter proved to be useful predictors of outcome. Within our patient group, timing of surgery did not appear to influence the outcome.