Electrophysiological Outcome Measures in Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

Validity and reliability study of a novel surface electromyography sensor using a well-consolidated electromyography system in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Non-interventional, cross-sectional pilot study.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the validity and reliability of the BioStamp nPoint biosensor (Medidata Solutions, New York, NY, USA [formerly MC10, Inc.]) for measuring electromyography in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) by comparing the surface electromyography (sEMG) metrics with the Trigno wireless electromyography system (Delsys, Natick, MA, USA).

SETTING

Participants were recruited from the Shirley Ryan AbilityLab registry.

METHODS

Individuals aged 18-70 years with cervical SCI were evaluated with the two biosensors to capture activity on upper-extremity muscles during two study sessions conducted over 2 days (day 1-consent alone; day 2-two data collections in same session). Time and frequency metrics were captured, and signal-to-noise ratio was determined for each muscle group. Test-retest reliability was determined using Pearson's correlation. Validation of the BioStamp nPoint system was based on Bland-Altmann analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 11 participants, 30.8% had subacute cervical injury at C5-C6; 53.8% were injured within 1 year of the study. Results from the test-retest reliability assessment revealed that most Pearson's correlations between the two sensory measurements were strong (≥0.50). The Bland-Altman analysis found values of the signal-to-noise ratio, frequency, and peak amplitude were within the level of agreement. Signal-to-noise ratios ranged from 7.06 to 22.1.

CONCLUSIONS

In most instances, the performance of the BioStamp nPoint sensors was moderately to strongly correlated with that of the Trigno sensors in all muscle groups tested. The BioStamp nPoint system is a valid and reliable approach to assess sEMG measures in individuals with cervical SCI.

SPONSORSHIP

The present study was supported by AbbVie Inc.

Sensitivity Analysis of CMAP Scan Step Index to Different Stimulation Parameters and Examination of Muscles Affected by Spinal Cord Injury

Step index (STEPIX) is a recently developed compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan method for evaluating motor unit loss and remodeling changes. This study investigates the influence of different stimulation parameters during CMAP scan on STEPIX and its examination of muscles affected by spinal cord injury (SCI). CMAP scan of the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle was performed using different stimulus pulse widths (0.1 ms, 0.2 ms) and different numbers of stimuli (500, 1000) in 12 neurologically intact subjects. STEPIX was derived from each CMAP scan of all subjects. A significantly higher STEPIX was obtained using 1000 stimuli than 500 stimuli, while no significant difference in STEPIX was observed using 0.1 and 0.2 ms stimulus pulse widths. STEPIX was further applied to process CMAP scans of the FDI muscle from 13 tetraplegia and 13 healthy control subjects using the same stimulation parameter setting (0.1 ms, 500 stimuli), along with other methods including MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE) and D50. STEPIX was significantly lower for the SCI subjects compared with the healthy control subjects. STEPIX was significantly correlated with MscanFit MUNE and D50, but had a smaller relative width of the overlapping zone (WOZ%) between tetraplegic and healthy control groups compared with MScanFit MUNE and D50. The findings of the study highlight the importance of maintaining a consistent stimulation parameter setting in CMAP scan studies and confirm the usefulness of STEPIX as a convenient CMAP scan parameter for examination of motor unit number changes.

A Novel Analysis of CMAP Scans From Perspective of Information Theory: CMAP Distribution Index (CDIX)

OBJECTIVE

The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan is a useful technique for examination of neuromuscular disorders. The objective of this study is to develop a novel analysis of CMAP scans from the perspective of information theory.

METHODS

A novel index parameter called CMAP distribution index (CDIX) was developed to characterize CMAP scan based on calculation of the information entropy. The performance of CDIX was evaluated using CMAP scan data from healthy control and spinal cord injury (SCI) subjects, and compared with D50 and MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE).

RESULTS

CDIX was significantly lower for the SCI subjects compared with the healthy control subjects (p < 0.001). A significant correlation ( R2 = 0.58, p < 0.001) was found between CDIX and MScanFit MUNE. Among all tested parameters (maximum CMAP, D50, MScanFit MUNE and CDIX), CDIX achieved the smallest relative width of the overlapping zone (WOZ%) between SCI and healthy control subjects.

CONCLUSION

CDIX can be inferred as a useful index reflecting motor unit loss and muscle fiber reinnervation changes.

The Role of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Peripheral Electrotherapy, and Neurophysiology Tests for Managing Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Efforts to find therapeutic methods that support spinal cord functional regeneration continue to be desirable. Natural recovery is limited, so high hopes are being placed on neuromodulation methods which promote neuroplasticity, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and electrical stimulation used as treatment options for managing incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) apart from kinesiotherapy. However, there is still no agreement on the methodology and algorithms for treatment with these methods. The search for effective therapy is also hampered by the use of different, often subjective in nature, evaluation methods and difficulties in assessing the actual results of the therapy versus the phenomenon of spontaneous spinal cord regeneration. In this study, an analysis was performed on the database of five trials, and the cumulative data are presented. Participants (iSCI patients) were divided into five groups on the basis of the treatment they had received: rTMS and kinesiotherapy (N = 36), peripheral electrotherapy and kinesiotherapy (N = 65), kinesiotherapy alone (N = 55), rTMS only (N = 34), and peripheral electrotherapy mainly (N = 53). We present changes in amplitudes and frequencies of the motor units’ action potentials recorded by surface electromyography (sEMG) from the tibialis anterior—the index muscle for the lower extremity and the percentage of improvement in sEMG results before and after the applied therapies. The increase in values in sEMG parameters represents the better ability of motor units to recruit and, thus, improvement of neural efferent transmission. Our results indicate that peripheral electrotherapy provides a higher percentage of neurophysiological improvement than rTMS; however, the use of any of these additional stimulation methods (rTMS or peripheral electrotherapy) provided better results than the use of kinesiotherapy alone. The best improvement of tibialis anterior motor units’ activity in iSCI patients provided the application of electrotherapy conjoined with kinesiotherapy and rTMS conjoined with kinesiotherapy. We also undertook a review of the current literature to identify and summarise available works which address the use of rTMS or peripheral electrotherapy as neuromodulation treatment options in patients after iSCI. Our goal is to encourage other clinicians to implement both types of stimulation into the neurorehabilitation program for subjects after iSCI and evaluate their effectiveness with neurophysiological tests such as sEMG so further results and algorithms can be compared across studies. Facilitating the motor rehabilitation process by combining two rehabilitation procedures together was confirmed.

Virtual reality does not fool the brain only: spinal excitability changes during virtually simulated falling

Virtual reality (VR) is known to induce substantial activation of brain's motor regions. It remains unclear to what extent virtual reality can trigger the sensorimotor system, and more particularly, whether it can affect lower nervous levels. In this study, we aimed to assess whether VR simulation of challenging and stressful postural situations (Richie's plank experience) could interfere with spinal excitability of postural muscles in 15 healthy young participants. The H-reflex of the triceps surae muscles was elicited with electrical nerve stimulation while participants were standing and wearing a VR headset. Participants went through several conditions, during which stimulations were evoked: standing still (noVR), standing in VR on the ground (groundVR), standing on the edge of a building (plankVR), and falling from the building (fallingVR). Myoelectrical activity of the triceps surae muscles was measured throughout the experiment. Leg and head movements were also measured by means of accelerometers to account for body oscillations. First, no differences in head rotations and myoelectrical activity were to be noted between conditions. Second, triceps H-reflex (H_MAX/M_MAX) was not affected from noVR to groundVR and plankVR. The most significant finding was a drastic decrease in H-reflex during falling (-47 ± 26.9% between noVR and fallingVR, P = 0.015). It is suggested that experiencing a postural threat in VR efficiently modulates spinal excitability, despite remaining in a quiet standing posture. This study suggests that simulated falling mimics the neural adjustments observed during actual postural challenge tasks.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The present study showed a modulation of spinal excitability induced by virtual reality (VR). In the standing position, soleus H-reflex was downmodulated during a simulated falling, in the absence of apparent changes in body oscillations. Since the same behavior is usually observed during real falling, it was suggested that the visual cues provided by VR were sufficiently strong to lead the neuromuscular system to mimic the actual modulation.

Surface EMG in Subacute and Chronic Care after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries

Background: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition commonly originating from motor vehicle accidents or falls. Trauma care after SCI is challenging; after decompression surgery and spine stabilization, the first step is to assess the location and severity of the traumatic lesion. For this, clinical outcome measures are used to quantify the residual sensation and volitional control of muscles below the level of injury. These clinical assessments are important for decision-making, including the prediction of the recovery potential of individuals after the SCI. In clinical care, this quantification is usually performed using sensation and motor scores, a semi-quantitative measurement, alongside the binary classification of the sacral sparing (yes/no). Objective: In this perspective article, I review the use of surface EMG (sEMG) as a quantitative outcome measurement in subacute and chronic trauma care after SCI. Methods: Here, I revisit the main findings of two comprehensive scoping reviews recently published by our team on this topic. I offer a perspective on the combined findings of these scoping reviews, which integrate the changes in sEMG with SCI and the use of sEMG in neurorehabilitation after SCI. Results: sEMG provides a complimentary assessment to quantify the residual control of muscles with great sensitivity and detail compared to the traditional clinical assessments. Our scoping reviews unveiled the ability of the sEMG assessment to detect discomplete lesions (muscles with absent motor scores but present sEMG). Moreover, sEMG is able to measure the spontaneous activity of motor units at rest, and during passive maneuvers, the evoked responses with sensory or motor stimulation, and the integrity of the spinal cord and descending tracts with motor evoked potentials. This greatly complements the diagnostics of the SCI in the subacute phase of trauma care and deepens our understanding of neurorehabilitation strategies during the chronic phase of the traumatic injury. Conclusions: sEMG offers important insights into the neurophysiological factors underlying sensorimotor impairment and recovery after SCIs. Although several qualitative or semi-quantitative outcome measures determine the level of injury and the natural recovery after SCIs, using quantitative measures such as sEMG is promising. Nonetheless, there are still several barriers limiting the use of sEMG in the clinical environment and a need to advance high-density sEMG technology.

Properties of the surface electromyogram following traumatic spinal cord injury: a scoping review

Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts spinal and supraspinal pathways, and this process is reflected in changes in surface electromyography (sEMG). sEMG is an informative complement to current clinical testing and can capture the residual motor command in great detail-including in muscles below the level of injury with seemingly absent motor activities. In this comprehensive review, we sought to describe how the sEMG properties are changed after SCI. We conducted a systematic literature search followed by a narrative review focusing on sEMG analysis techniques and signal properties post-SCI. We found that early reports were mostly focused on the qualitative analysis of sEMG patterns and evolved to semi-quantitative scores and a more detailed amplitude-based quantification. Nonetheless, recent studies are still constrained to an amplitude-based analysis of the sEMG, and there are opportunities to more broadly characterize the time- and frequency-domain properties of the signal as well as to take fuller advantage of high-density EMG techniques. We recommend the incorporation of a broader range of signal properties into the neurophysiological assessment post-SCI and the development of a greater understanding of the relation between these sEMG properties and underlying physiology. Enhanced sEMG analysis could contribute to a more complete description of the effects of SCI on upper and lower motor neuron function and their interactions, and also assist in understanding the mechanisms of change following neuromodulation or exercise therapy.

The Use of Motor-Evoked Potentials in Clinical Trials in Multiple Sclerosis

SUMMARY

Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) can be used to assess the integrity of the descending corticospinal tract in the laboratory. Evoked potentials (EPs) have been widely used in the past for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), but they are now becoming more useful in assessing the prognosis of the disease. Motor-evoked potentials have been included in EP scales that have demonstrated good correlations with clinical disability. Soon after the onset of MS, it is possible to detect an ongoing process of neurodegeneration and axonal loss. Axonal loss is probably responsible for the disability and disease progression that occurs in MS. Given the good correlations of EPs in detecting disease progression in MS, they have been used to monitor the effects of drugs used to treat the disease. Several clinical trials used MEPs as part of their EP evaluation, but MEPs have never been used as a measure of efficacy in clinical trials testing neuroprotective agents, although MEPs could be a very promising tool to measure neuroprotection and remyelination resulting from these drugs. To be used in multicenter clinical trials, MEP readings should be comparable between centers. Standardized multicenter EP assessment with central reading has been demonstrated to be feasible and reliable. Although MEP measurements have been correlated with clinical scores and other measures of neurodegeneration, further validation of MEP amplitude measurements is needed regarding their validity, reliability, and sensitivity before they can be routinely used in clinical drug trials in MS.