A Report on Occupational Ionizing Radiation Exposure by an Orthopedic Surgeon in a National Health-care Setting - Clinical Case Perspective

Improved Radiation Exposure Monitoring of Orthopaedic Residents After Institution of a Personalized Lead Protocol

Background:

Radiation exposure of orthopaedic residents should be accurately monitored to monitor and mitigate risk. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a personalized lead protocol (PLP) with a radiation monitoring officer would improve radiation exposure monitoring of orthopaedic surgery residents.

Materials and Methods:

This was a retrospective case-control study of 15 orthopaedic surgery residents monitored for radiation exposure during a 2-year period (March 2017 until February 2019). During the first 12-month period (phase 1), residents were given monthly radiation dosimeter badges and instructed to attach them daily to the communal lead aprons hanging outside the operating rooms. During the second 12-month period (phase 2), a PLP (PLP group) was instituted in which residents were given lead aprons embroidered with their individual names. A radiation safety officer was appointed who placed the badges monthly on all lead aprons and collected them at the end of the month, whereas faculty ensured residents wore their personalized lead apron. Data collected included fluoroscopy use time and radiation dosimeter readings during all orthopaedic surgeries in the study period.

Results:

There were 1,252 orthopaedic surgeries using fluoroscopy during phase 1 in the control group and 1,269 during phase 2 in the PLP group. The total monthly fluoroscopy exposure time for all cases averaged 190 minutes during phase 1 and 169 minutes during phase 2, with no significant difference between the groups (p < 0.45). During phase 1, 73.1% of the dosimeters reported radiation exposure, whereas during phase 2, 88.7% of the dosimeters reported radiation exposure (p < 0.001). During phase 1, the average monthly resident dosimeter exposure reading was 7.26 millirems (mrem) ± 37.07, vs. 19.00 mrem ± 51.16 during phase 2, which was significantly higher (p < 0.036).

Conclusions:

Institution of a PLP increased the compliance and exposure readings of radiation dosimeter badges for orthopaedic surgery residents, whereas the actual monthly fluoroscopy time did not change. Teaching hospitals should consider implementing a PLP to more accurately monitor exposure.

Level of Evidence:

3.

An Observational Survey of Nail and Skin of Spine Surgeons-Possible Damage by Occupational Ionizing Radiation Exposure

Introduction

Orthopedic surgeons are exposed to ionizing radiation daily. With the increase in the number of minimally invasive surgery performed under X-ray fluoroscopy, radiation exposure to unprotected fingers will increase. Although the effect of high dose radiation exposure is known, the long-term effect of exposure to low doses is unclear. This study aims to investigate damage to the nail and skin on the thumbs of spine surgeons via occupational ionizing radiation exposure.

Methods

Forty male spine surgeons (group S) and 40 males of the same age group who were not exposed to radiation (controls; group C) were included. Using a scoring system, we evaluated the damage to the fingernail and skin of the bilateral thumb. Scoring was based on fingernail pigmentation (melanonychia), fingernail crack, and periungual dermatitis status. We investigated the number of examinations and operations under radiation exposure in the last 3 months.

Results

Group S had 17.83 (3-28) years of surgeon experience. In group S, the dominant side scored significantly higher than the non-dominant side; however, there was no dominant vs. non-dominant difference in group C. Only the dominant side had a significantly higher score in group S than in group C. In group S, surgeon experience and the score of the dominant side were significantly correlated; however, for the non-dominant side of group S and both thumbs of group C, no correlation was observed. The kappa coefficients for fingernail pigmentation, fingernail crack, and periungual dermatitis status were 0.458, 0.248, and 0.612, respectively. The average number of examinations and operations under radiation exposure was 11.89 ± 9.04 (0-30) and 26.34 ± 14.67 (1-63), respectively.

Conclusions

The dominant side in group S had a significantly higher score than the non-dominant side in group S and the dominant side in group C, suggesting the possibility of radiation damage to the dominant side in group S.

Assessment of Genomic Instability in Medical Workers Exposed to Chronic Low-Dose X-Rays in Northern China

The increasing use of ionizing radiation (IR) in medical diagnosis and treatment has caused considerable concern regarding the effects of occupational exposure on human health. Despite this concern, little information is available regarding possible effects and the mechanism behind chronic low-dose irradiation. The present study assessed potential genomic damage in workers occupationally exposed to low-dose X-rays. A variety of analyses were conducted, including assessing the level of DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations (CA) as well as cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assay, gene expression profiling, and antioxidant level determination. Here, we report that the level of DNA damage, CA, and CBMN were all significantly increased. Moreover, the gene expression and antioxidant activities were changed in the peripheral blood of men exposed to low-dose X-rays. Collectively, our findings indicated a strong correlation between genomic instability and duration of low-dose IR exposure. Our data also revealed the DNA damage repair and antioxidative mechanisms which could result in the observed genomic instability in health-care workers exposed to chronic low-dose IR.