Nateglinide therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Development of pharmacogenomic algorithm to optimize nateglinide dose for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Nateglinide is a meglitinide used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Individual studies demonstrated the association of CYP2C9, SLCO1B1, and MTNR1B variants with the safety and efficacy of nateglinide. The current study aimed to develop a pharmacogenomic algorithm to optimize nateglinide therapy.

METHODS

Multiple linear regression (MLR) and classification and regression tree (CART) were used to develop a pharmacogenomic algorithm for nateglinide dosing based on the published nateglinide pharmacokinetic data on the area under the curve data (AUC) and C_max (n = 143). CYP2C9 metabolizer phenotype, SLCO1B1, MTNR1B genotypes, and CYP2C9 inhibitor usage were used as the input variables. The results and associations were further confirmed by meta-analysis and in silico studies.

RESULTS

The MLR models of AUC and C_max explain 87.4% and 59% variability in nateglinide pharmacokinetics. The Bland and Altman analysis of the nateglinide dose predicted by these two MLR models showed a bias of ± 26.28 mg/meal. The CART algorithm was proposed based on these findings. This model is further justified by the meta-analysis showing increased AUCs in CYP2C9 intermediate metabolizers and SLCOB1 TC and CC genotypes compared to the wild genotypes. The increased AUC in SLCO1B1 mutants is due to decreased binding affinity of nateglinide to the mutant affecting the influx of nateglinide into hepatocytes. MTNR1B rs10830963 G-allele-mediated poor response to nateglinide is attributed to increased transcriptional factor binding causing decreased insulin secretion.

CONCLUSION

CYP2C9, SLCO1B1, and MTNR1B genotyping help in optimizing nateglinide therapy based on this algorithm and ensuring safety and efficacy.

Nateglinide Exerts Neuroprotective Effects via Downregulation of HIF-1α/TIM-3 Inflammatory Pathway and Promotion of Caveolin-1 Expression in the Rat's Hippocampus Subjected to Focal Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

Ischemic stroke is a major cause of death and motor disabilities all over the world. It is a muti-factorial disorder associated with inflammatory, apoptotic, and oxidative responses. Nateglinide (NAT), an insulinotropic agent used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, recently showed potential anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects. The aim of our study was to elucidate the unique neuroprotective role of NAT in the middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO)-induced stroke in rats. Fifty-six male rats were divided to 4 groups (n = 14 in each group): the sham-operated group, sham receiving NAT (50 mg/kg/day, p.o) group, ischemia/reperfusion (IR) group, and IR receiving NAT group (50 mg/kg/day, p.o). MCAO caused potent deficits in motor and behavioral functions of the rats. Significant increase in inflammatory and apoptotic biomarkers has been observed in rats' hippocampi. Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway was significantly stimulated causing activation of series inflammatory biomarkers ending up neuro-inflammatory milieu. Pretreatment with NAT preserved rats' normal behavioral and motor functions. Moreover, NAT opposed the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) resulting in downregulation of more inflammatory mediators namely, NF-κB, tumor necrosis factor-β (TNF-β), and the anti-survival gene PMAIP-1. NAT stimulated caveolin-1 (Cav-1) which prevented expression of oxidative biomarkers, nitric oxide (NO), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) and hamper the activation of apoptotic biomarker caspase-3. In conclusion, our work postulated that NAT exhibited its neuroprotective effects in rats with ischemic stroke via attenuation of different unique oxidative, apoptotic, and inflammatory pathways.

Exploration of the nitrogen heterocyclic periphery around the core of the advanced FFA1 agonist fasiglifam (TAK-875)

Three types of heterocyclic moieties-piperidines fused to a heteroaromatic moiety-were explored as potential periphery motifs for the pharmacophoric core of fasiglifam (TAK-875), with fasiglifam being the most advanced agonist of free fatty acid receptor 1, a promising target for therapeutic intervention in type 2 diabetes. Several observed structure-activity relationship trends were corroborated by in silico docking results. Balanced selection based on potency and Caco-2 permeability advanced six compounds to cellular efficacy tests (glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in rat insulinoma INS1E cells). This led to the nomination of compound 16a (LK1408, 3-[4-({4-[(3-{[(2-fluorobenzyl)oxy]methyl}-1-methyl-1,4,6,7-tetrahydro-5H-pyrazolo[4,3-c]pyridin-5-yl)methyl]benzyl}oxy)phenyl]propanoic acid hydrochloride) as the lead for further development.

Comparison of the postprandial glucose and insulin profiles with nateglinide and gliclazide in type 2 diabetic patients

Aim

The aim of this study was to compare glucose, insulin and proinsulin profiles during nateglinide and gliclazide treatment over an extended postprandial period.

Materials and methods

This double-blind crossover trial was conducted in 23 type 2 diabetic patients (mean HbA1C 6.6%; range 6.0—7.4%) who received, for one week each, nateglinide 120 mg t.i.d., gliclazide 80 mg b.i.d. and placebo, with a one week wash out period between treatments.

Results

The 2-hour postprandial glucose concentration was markedly lower with nateglinide than with gliclazide (5.83 vs. 7.21 mmol/L; p<0.05), as was the post-meal peak glucose elevation (8.63 vs. 9.72 mmol/L; p=0.085), which was associated with earlier, higher and shorter-lived insulin and proinsulin secretory responses. However, 0—7-hour AUCs during standardised meal test for glucose and insulin between the two drugs did not statistically differ. No symptomatic hypoglycaemic events occurred during the 7-hour test period.

Conclusion

Nateglinide was more effective than gliclazide in controlling postprandial hyperglycaemia and showed a faster effect on insulin and proinsulin secretion.

Toxicity of Oral Agents Used to Treat Diabetes

Oral agents used for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus include sulfonylureas, biguanides, thiazolidinediones, metglitinides, and/or α -glucosidase inhibitors. These medication classes can be further classified as hypoglycemic and antihyperglycemic agents. Hypoglycemia is a major symptom of toxicity of these agents, particularly with the sulfonylureas, including combination medications that include sulfonylureas. In overdose situations, metformin, a biguanide, can lead to considerable gastrointestinal adverse effects and potentially lactic acidosis in severe cases. Data on the management of toxicities of the other classes are limited. This article will review the treatment modalities that have been used for treating symptomatic hypoglycemia and metformin-induced lactic acidosis.

Stereoselective binding of chiral anti-diabetic drug nateglinide to plasma proteins

The binding of nateglinide (NA) enantiomers with human plasma (HP), human serum albumin (HSA) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) was investigated. The protein binding was studied over a drug concentration range of 5-100 μM at a protein concentration of 600 μM. Unbound drug concentrations were determined by direct chiral liquid chromatography using chiralcel OJ-RH column. At therapeutic drug concentrations, the protein binding of each enantiomer was >98%. The results showed that the binding of NA enantiomers was stereoselective, mutually competitive and non-linear. The binding characteristics were, however, opposite for the two most important plasma binding proteins. Opposite stereo-selectivity was observed between BSA and HSA while stereo-selectivity was identical between HSA and HP. Scatchard analysis was used to illustrate the different binding affinities of NA enantiomers to BSA, HSA and HP. The interaction between enantiomers observed in HP and serum albumins was confirmed as a competitive type interaction at the high affinity site. Scatchard analysis was used to illustrate the different binding affinities of NA enantiomers to BSA, HSA and HP.

Drug-induced hypoglycaemia: an update

Drugs are the most frequent cause of hypoglycaemia in adults. Although hypoglycaemia is a well known adverse effect of antidiabetic agents, it may occasionally develop in the course of treatment with drugs used in everyday clinical practice, including NSAIDs, analgesics, antibacterials, antimalarials, antiarrhythmics, antidepressants and other miscellaneous agents. They induce hypoglycaemia by stimulating insulin release, reducing insulin clearance or interfering with glucose metabolism. Several drugs may also potentiate the hypoglycaemic effect of antidiabetic agents. Administration of these agents to individuals with diabetes mellitus is of most concern. Many of these drugs, and depending on clinical setting, may also induce hyperglycaemia. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity may lead in certain circumstances to hypoglycaemia. Some drugs may also induce hypoglycaemia by causing pancreatitis. Drug-induced hypoglycaemia is usually mild but may be severe. Effective clinical management can be handled through awareness of this drug-induced adverse effect on blood glucose levels. Herein, we review pertinent clinical information on the incidence of drug-induced hypoglycaemia and discuss the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, and prevention and management.

Management of diabetes-related hypoglycemia

Iatrogenic hypoglycemia is the main factor limiting aggressive and optimal diabetes management. Rather than being an inevitable consequence of optimal glycemic control, however, hypoglycemia is avoidable and generally straightforward to manage when it occurs. Professional caregivers, patients, and their families are often fearful of hypoglycemia, even though most episodes are minor and easily self-treated. Understanding the factors contributing to hypoglycemia risk and how to minimize its occurrence is an essential part of diabetes care. Building on the physiologic fundamentals presented in the accompanying review, the incidence, mortality/morbidity, clinical symptoms, severity classification, and psychosocial impact of hypoglycemia are described here. Appropriate selection and titration of therapeutic agents, including insulin analogs with more predictable time-action profiles than human insulin formulations, can reduce hypoglycemia risk. Patient education about hypoglycemia prevention, including symptom recognition and necessity of rapid treatment, behavioral modification, and the importance of frequent blood glucose monitoring should accompany all therapeutic interventions.

A model of long-term metabolic progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus for evaluating treatment strategies

AIM

To develop a novel metabolic computer model of the natural lifetime progression of type 2 diabetes that generates dynamic risk factor trajectories consistent with prespecified lifetime therapeutic strategies, in order to enhance the long-term economic and outcome modelling of type 2 diabetes and its complications.

METHODS

The main model drivers of progressive disease were changes in insulin sensitivity and islet beta-cell function derived from an analysis of follow-up results from the Belfast Diet Study. These were related to clinical measures through an adaptation of the homeostasis model assessment. Established causal relationships estimating body mass index, lipids and blood pressure from measures of glycaemia and plasma insulin were calibrated using Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (USA) data, standardizing for age, sex, ethnicity and smoking. The effects of individual interventions were calibrated using published trial evidence, in line with the current understanding of the main modes of action of each agent.

RESULTS

A comparison of the effects of common therapies using the model showed both similarities and differences. Large improvements in glycaemic control from lifestyle modifications, further enhanced by oral glucose-lowering drugs or insulin, were reproduced. Projections comparing lifetime therapeutic strategies suggest that simple guidelines may not always be valid.

CONCLUSION

This novel mathematical model using evidence from the long-term natural history of type 2 diabetes is able to project the expected effects of various antihyperglycaemic therapies. Coupled with an economic model, this metabolic model may provide a mechanism for healthcare professionals and policymakers to evaluate different long-term strategies for the management of type 2 diabetes.

The stepwise approach to the management of type 2 diabetes

As the prevalence of type 2 diabetes continues to increase worldwide, there is an enhanced need for effective disease management. Type 2 diabetes is managed through a stepwise program of intensive therapy that consists of lifestyle modifications and sequential addition of oral antihyperglycemic agents and insulin as necessary. Successful implementation of this approach lessens the microvascular complications of the disease and promotes a lifestyle that may reduce macrovascular complications and comorbidities. Because of the progressive pancreatic beta-cell failure that causes hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, many people with type 2 diabetes will ultimately require insulin for disease management. Insulin may be used alone or in combination with oral agents to achieve glycemic control with a minimum of side effects. Although disease management regimens must be tailored to the needs of the individual with type 2 diabetes, the health care provider should always employ an aggressive, treat-to-target strategy to lower hyperglycemia and lessen diabetes-related risk factors.

Sulfonylurea treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: focus on glimepiride

Sulfonylureas, which have evolved through two generations since their introduction nearly 50 years ago, remain the most frequently prescribed oral agents for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Glyburide, glipizide, and glimepiride, the newest sulfonylureas, are as effective at lowering plasma glucose concentrations as first-generation agents but are more potent, better tolerated, and associated with a lower risk of adverse effects. Differences in their binding affinity to the beta-cell sulfonylurea receptor have been described, with preservation of cardioprotective responses to ischemia with glimepiride. Clinical studies have shown glimepiride to be safe and effective in reducing fasting and postprandial glucose levels, as well as glycosylated hemoglobin concentrations, with dosages of 1-8 mg/day. In comparative trials, glimepiride was as effective in lowering glucose levels as glyburide and glipizide, but glimepiride was associated with a reduced likelihood of hypoglycemia and a smaller increase in fasting insulin and C-peptide levels than glyburide, and a more rapid lowering of fasting plasma glucose levels than glipizide. Glimepiride also improves first-phase insulin secretion, which plays an important role in reducing postprandial hyperglycemia. Insulin secretagogues, specifically glimepiride, merit consideration as first-line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of nateglinide: a rapidly-absorbed, short-acting insulinotropic agent

The prevalence and medical and economic impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing in Western societies. New agents have been developed that act primarily to reduce postprandial glucose excursions, which may be of particular significance now that postprandial glucose excursions are known to be correlated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Nateglinide is a phenylalanine derivative that blocks K+ channels in pancreatic beta-cells, facilitating insulin secretion. Nateglinide sensitises beta-cells to ambient glucose, reducing the glucose concentration needed to stimulate insulin secretion. The pharmacokinetics of nateglinide are characterised by rapid absorption and elimination, with good (73%) bioavailability. Nateglinide is more rapidly absorbed when given 0-30 minutes prior to meal ingestion than if given during the meal. Nateglinide is extensively metabolised, primarily by cytochrome P450 2C9, and eliminated primarily by the kidney. Nateglinide pharmacokinetics are linear over the dose range 60-240 mg. No significant pharmacokinetic alterations occur in renally impaired patients, in the elderly, or in mildly hepatically impaired patients. Nateglinide administered prior to meals stimulates rapid, short-lived insulin secretion in a dose-dependent manner, thus decreasing mealtime plasma glucose excursions. Its effects on insulin secretion are synergistic with those of a meal. With increasing nateglinide doses, the risk of hypoglycaemia also increases, but its incidence is low. Even if a meal is missed, and the patient skips the dose of nateglinide (as recommended in the event of a missed meal), the incidence of subsequent hypoglycaemia remains low compared with long-acting agents. The postprandial insulinotropic effects of nateglinide are more rapid than those of repaglinide and more rapid and greater than those of glibenclamide (glyburide), while producing less prolonged insulin exposure and less risk of delayed hypoglycaemia. Further investigation is required to determine if nateglinide inhibition of postprandial glucose excursions will help to prevent diabetic complications or preserve pancreatic beta-cell function.

Evaluation of a new insulinotropic agent by using an innovative technology: efficacy and safety of nateglinide determined by continuous glucose monitoring

Nateglinide, a new insulinotropic agent, specifically targets prandial glycemic excursions. Recently, innovative technologies have become available that provide the possibility to measure 72-h blood glucose values continuously. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of nateglinide on 24-h blood glucose profiles in diabetic patients. Eighteen patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus--seven on diet only and 11 on metformin monotherapy--participated in the study. Mean age was 60 years, mean diabetes' duration was 7.4 years, and mean hemoglobin A1c was 8.4%. They underwent a 72-h glucose monitoring using a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS, Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA) under their usual diabetes therapy and a standardized breakfast. After this period, therapy with nateglinide, 120 mg three times a day before meals, was initiated. Three days later patients again underwent 72-h glucose monitoring. Mean blood glucose values and mean fasting blood glucose values decreased significantly, from 172 mg/dL before to 131 mg/dL (P< 0.0004) and from 172 mg/dL before to 126 mg/dL (P< 0.0005), respectively, with nateglinide therapy. Postprandial hyperglycemia, expressed as mean blood glucose over a time period of 2 h after a meal, declined significantly after all three daily meals. The number of blood glucose values above 140 mg/dL decreased from 207 without to 98 during nateglinide therapy. Nateglinide was not associated with hypoglycemia or other adverse events. We found in this study, using CGMS, that nateglinide has a glucose-lowering potency that not only affects postprandial hyperglycemia, but also overnight and fasting blood glucose values.