Mycophenolate Pharmacokinetics in Early Period Following Lung or Heart Transplantation

Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil In De Novo Renal Transplantation in a Retrospective Cohort of Transplant Recipients in Colombia-Esmitren Study

BACKGROUND

To describe and establish the efficacy and safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil (Micoflavin) in patients with de novo renal transplantation during one-year post-transplant follow-up. As secondary objectives, the behavior of mycophenolic acid (MPA) C0 levels in this population, the relationship between MPA levels and renal function of the grafts, the incidence of acute rejection, and the incidence of adverse effects were evaluated.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted on patients who received a first kidney transplant from a deceased donor between March 1, 2021, and February 28, 2022, at the Alma Mater of Antioquia Hospital of the Antioquia's University, in Medellín, Colombia. MPA C0 levels were taken from the patients on days 15, 30, 90, 180, and 360 after the kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

Patients presented MPA therapeutic levels in the study. The average of the MPA levels in the population was 2.5 µg/mL, with an IQR of 2.13 to 3.32. There were 5 acute rejections (27%), but none of the patients with acute rejection presented subtherapeutic levels of mycophenolate. No significant relationship was observed between mycophenolic acid levels and rejection (P = .255). The patients who completed the study had no gastrointestinal intolerance to mycophenolate, cytomegalovirus infections, or significant hematological complications.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF (Micoflavin) maintained mycophenolic acid levels C0 within the therapeutic range, was well tolerated and without the presence of significant adverse events, and maintained stable renal function throughout the follow-up period in the population studied.

A Limited Sampling Strategy for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Mycophenolate Mofetil for Prophylaxis of Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

A universally accepted strategy for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) does not exist. We explored the feasibility of developing a limited sampling strategy (LSS) for TDM of MMF in this setting. Patients undergoing alloHSCT received standard MMF-cyclosporine prophylaxis, with MMF administered twice daily (BD) for matched transplant recipients or thrice daily (TID) in haploidentical transplantation. Intensive blood sampling was carried out on day 7 and area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite, was estimated using noncompartmental analysis. The ability of MPA exposure defined by AUC_0-12 to discriminate between responders (patients who did not develop GVHD) and nonresponders (patients who developed GVHD) was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Patients were divided into training and validation sets within BD and TID groups. Mathematical equations were developed from the training set to predict AUC_0-12 from an abbreviated AUC involving a limited number of sampling points. The equations were validated in the validation set by comparing the MPA AUC_0-12 predicted from LSS with the observed AUC_0-12. It was observed that patients with AUC_0-12 ≤18.99 mg*h/L had a higher risk of developing aGVHD [odds ratio (OR) = 2.63 (1.17 to 5.87), P = 0.06]. The benefit was more in matched transplant recipients [OR = 3.5 (1.30 to 9.49), P = 0.05] as compared to haploindentical transplant [OR = 2.8 (0.49 to 15.91), P = NS]. Using the mathematical equations, the observed AUC_0-12 was predicted with 92.31% accuracy in the BD subset and 100% accuracy in the TID subset for a combined accuracy of 94.76%. A set of just three samples that constituted the abbreviated AUC_1-4 was used to develop the predictive models. The LSS could be employed for the therapeutic monitoring of MMF particularly in patients undergoing matched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Limited Sampling Strategy for Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Adult Chinese Heart Transplant Recipients

Background: With the increasing use of mycophenolic acid (MPA) formulations in organ transplantation, the need for personalized immunosuppressive therapy has become well recognized based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for avoidance of drug-related toxicity while maintaining efficacy. Few studies have assessed area under the 12 h concentration-time curve of MPA (MPA-AUC_0–12h) in heart transplant recipients who received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dispersible tablets (MMFdt). The aim of the study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of MMFdt combined with tacrolimus and further to develop a practical method for estimation of MPA-AUC_0–12h using a limited sampling strategy (LSS).

Methods: A prospective study in a single center was performed in patients who continuously administrated with MMFdt or MMF capsule (MMFc) for at least 7 days after cardiac transplantation from 2018 to 2020. A total of 48 Chinese adult heart transplant recipients were enrolled. Blood samples were collected before and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after MMF administration. The validated high-performance liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry method was used to measure MPA concentrations. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis was applied to calculate the data obtained from individual recipients by WinNonlin. LSS models were developed for MPA-AUC_0–12h prediction with multivariate stepwise regression analysis.

Results: A large inter-individual variability was observed in AUC_0–12h, T_max, C_max, MRT_0–12h, t_1/2 and CL/F after multiple dosing of MMFdt. However, no significant differences were observed between main PK parameters of MMFdt and MMFc. The best estimation of MPA-AUC_0–12h was achieved with four points: MPA-AUC_0–12h = 8.424 + 0.781 × C_0.5 + 1.263 × C₂ + 1.660 × C₄ + 3.022 × C₆ (R² = 0.844). The mean prediction error (MPE) and mean absolute prediction error (MAPE) of MPA-AUC_0–12h were 2.09 ± 14.05% and 11.17 ± 8.52%, respectively. Both internal and external validations showed good applicability for four-point LSS equation.

Conclusion: The results provide strong evidence for the use of LSS model other than a single time-point concentration of MPA when performing TDM. A four-point LSS equation using the concentrations at 0.5, 2, 4, 6 h is recommended to estimate MPA-AUC_0–12h during early period after transplantation in Chinese adult heart transplant recipients receiving MMFdt or MMFc. However, proper internal and external validations with more patients should be conducted in the future.

Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid and Its Glucuronidated Metabolites in Stable Lung Transplant Recipients

Background:

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil, an immunosuppressive agent commonly used in solid organ transplantation. MPA is metabolized to the inactive metabolite 7-O-mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG) and the active metabolite acyl glucuronide (AcMPAG). Pharmacokinetic profiling of MPA by determining AUC is a tool for determining drug exposure. Many studies, conducted primarily in kidney and some heart and liver transplant recipients, have shown wide interpatient variability in MPA's pharmacokinetic parameters. There have been few studies in the lung transplant group and, even though the lung is not involved in drug elimination, these patients may have different MPA pharmacokinetic characteristics.

Objective:

To characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters and metabolic ratios of MPA in stable adult lung transplant recipients.

Methods:

In an open-label manner, lung transplant recipients were recruited. Blood samples were obtained at 0, 0.3, 0.6, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours postdose. Plasma was separated and acidified for drug concentration analysis (MPA, MPAG, AcMPAG) by an HPLC–ultraviolet detection method. Conventional pharmacokinetic parameters were determined via noncompartmental methods.

Results:

There was large interpatient variability in all pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA, MPAG, and AcMPAG. Similar variability was observed after stratifying patients into concomitant medication groups: cyclosporine and tacrolimus. There was a trend for the tacrolimus group to have a higher dose-normalized AUC, higher AUC, lower apparent clearance, and lower AUC ratio of AcMPAG/MPA compared with the cyclosporine group. In addition, the cyclosporine group had a lower minimum concentration and higher AUC ratio of MPAG/MPA than did the tacrolimus group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Because of the large interpatient variability in the pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA, MPAG, and AcMPAG, therapeutic drug monitoring of MPA and its metabolites in lung transplant recipients may be beneficial.

Mycophenolate mofetil and systemic lupus erythematosus

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent which provides protection against acute transplant rejection, in patients who undergo kidney, heart and liver transplantation. Recently MMF has been used in various autoimmune conditions, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In SLE, MMF has been more extensively used in the treatment of proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis (GLN) and following the success in this field, it has also been used to control extra-renal manifestations. However, in the majority of cases MMF was administered to patients with refractory SLE manifestations and, therefore, no definite conclusion could be drawn from these experiences.

In this paper, after a brief description of the mechanisms of action, the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of MMF which are relevant in SLE, and after a short discussion on the utility of performing therapeutic dose monitoring of mycphenolic acid, the experiences with the use of this drug in the different SLE manifestations were summarized and some personal data in patients with GLN were reported. Finally, the hypothetical use of MMF as a preventive strategy against the occurrence of severe manifestations in patients with mild SLE has been put forward and discussed.

Multiple regression analysis of factors predicting mycophenolic acid free fraction in 91 adult organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an antirejection drug used in various types of solid organ transplants. MPA is extensively bound to albumin, and free MPA is thought to be the primary immunosuppressive agent. Little is known of what contributes to the wide interindividual variability in the observed MPA free fraction (MPAf) in humans. The purpose of this study was to determine, using multiple regression analysis of demographic and laboratory variables that are routinely collected during clinic visits, patient factors that predict MPAf in a large sample (n = 91) of organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

Age, weight, height, total daily MPA dose, albumin, serum creatinine (SrCr), and MPAf were obtained from islet (n = 16), kidney (n = 28), and heart/lung (n = 47) transplant recipients. Multiple linear regression analysis and the The Spearman rank correlation were conducted using SigmaStat (version 3.5 for Windows). Significance was set a priori at P = 0.05.

RESULTS

The pooled data can be described as (mean ± SD) follows: age (52 ± 13 years), weight (72 ± 15 kg), height (169 ± 9 cm), total daily MPA dose (1632 ± 667 mg), albumin (42 ± 7 g/L), SrCr (112 ± 34 µmol/L), and MPAf (2.9% ± 3.5%). Multiple regression of all commonly acquired variables generated the following equation: MPAf = 1.865 + (0.0357 × age (yrs)) + (0.0125 × weight (kg)) - (0.0202 × height (cm)) - (0.000323 × total daily dose (mg)) + (0.0122 × albumin (g/L)) + (0.0160 × SrCr (µmol/L)) (r = 0.06), but none of the variables were significant predictors of MPAf (P > 0.05). The Spearman rank correlation of each individual variable confirmed lack of significant correlation with MPAf.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study attempting to describe factors predicting MPAf in adult organ transplant recipients involving a large sample size. The novel findings of lack of significant predictors warrant further investigations using additional patient factors.

Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II

Part I of this article, which appeared in the previous issue of the Journal, reviewed calcineurin inhibitors--ciclosporin and tacrolimus. In part II, we review the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors--sirolimus and everolimus--in thoracic transplantation, and we provide an overall discussion and suggest various areas for future study.

Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I

Although immunosuppressive treatments and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) have significantly contributed to the increased success of thoracic transplantation, there is currently no consensus on the best immunosuppressive strategies. Maintenance therapy typically consists of a triple-drug regimen including corticosteroids, a calcineurin inhibitor (ciclosporin or tacrolimus) and either a purine synthesis antagonist (mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine) or a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (sirolimus or everolimus). The incidence of acute and chronic rejection and of mortality after thoracic transplantation is still high compared with other types of solid organ transplantation. The high allogenicity and immunogenicity of the lungs justify the use of higher doses of immunosuppressants, putting lung transplant recipients at a higher risk of drug-induced toxicities. All immunosuppressants are characterized by large intra- and interindividual variability of their pharmacokinetics and by a narrow therapeutic index. It is essential to know their pharmacokinetic properties and to use them for treatment individualization through TDM in order to improve the treatment outcome. Unlike the kidneys and the liver, the heart and the lungs are not directly involved in drug metabolism and elimination, which may be the cause of pharmacokinetic differences between patients from all of these transplant groups. TDM is mandatory for most immunosuppressants and has become an integral part of immunosuppressive drug therapy. It is usually based on trough concentration (C(0)) monitoring, but other TDM tools include the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the (12-hour) dosage interval or the AUC over the first 4 hours post-dose, as well as other single concentration-time points such as the concentration at 2 hours. Given the peculiarities of thoracic transplantation, a review of the pharmacokinetics and TDM of the main immunosuppressants used in thoracic transplantation is presented in this article. Even more so than in other solid organ transplant populations, their pharmacokinetics are characterized by wide intra- and interindividual variability in thoracic transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in heart and lung transplant recipients have been explored in a number of studies, but less is known about the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in these populations, and there are hardly any studies on the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus and everolimus. Given the increased use of these molecules in thoracic transplant recipients, their pharmacokinetics deserve to be explored in depth. There are very few data, some of which are conflicting, on the practices and outcomes of TDM of immunosuppressants after thoracic transplantation. The development of sophisticated TDM tools dedicated to thoracic transplantation are awaited in order to accurately evaluate the patients' exposure to drugs in general and, in particular, to immunosuppressants. Finally, large cohort TDM studies need to be conducted in thoracic transplant patients in order to identify the most predictive exposure indices and their target values, and to validate the clinical usefulness of improved TDM in these conditions. In part I of the article, we review the pharmacokinetics and TDM of calcineurin inhibitors. In part II, we will review the pharmacokinetics and TDM of mycophenolate and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and provide an overall discussion along with perspectives.

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolites in stable adult liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction on a low-dose calcineurin inhibitor regimen and mycophenolate mofetil

Low-dose calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in combination with a fixed dose (2 g/d) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are a strategy to minimize exposure to cyclosporine (CSA) or tacrolimus (TAC) and thus reduce CNI-related side effects. This study compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and its glucuronide metabolites in stable adult liver transplant recipients with moderately impaired renal function converted from a standard to a low-dose CNI regimen in combination with a fixed dose of MMF. Full 12-hour PK profiles of MPA, free MPA, the aryl glucuronide (MPAG), and the acyl glucuronide (AcMPAG) were obtained from 30 stable liver transplant patients on low-dose CNI (CSA, n = 12; TAC, n = 18) therapy at least 3 months after initiation of low-dose therapy. Predose CSA and TAC concentrations (quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) ranged from 17 to 35 and 1.1 to 3.7 microg/L, respectively. The PK variables for MPA, MPAG, AcMPAG, and free MPA displayed wide interindividual variability. Of note was the observation that there were no significant differences in the exposure to MPA, MPAG, and free MPA between the CSA and TAC groups. MPA area under the concentration-time curves (AUCs) ranged from 31.8 to 102.1 (median: 52.9) mg.h(-1).L(-1) in the CSA group and from 22.9 to 144.8 (median: 55.9) mg.h(-1).L(-1) in the TAC group. The AcMPAG AUC on patients under low-dose CSA therapy was higher than that observed under patients on low-dose TAC therapy, although this did not quite reach statistical significance (P = 0.057). Patients receiving CSA had a significantly higher AcMPAG Cmax but not AcMPAG AUC, suggesting that only peak CSA concentrations on a low-dose CSA regimen are sufficient to impair the biliary excretion of AcMPAG. In summary, the influence of CSA on the exposure to MPA was attenuated in stable adult liver transplant recipients on a low-dose CNI therapy in combination with a fixed dose of MMF as compared with patients on a standard CNI therapy. Dose adjustment according to drug concentration measurements is recommended to optimize dosing of MMF and to maintain adequate immunosuppression in patients converted to low-dose CNI therapy.

Potential immunological advantage of intravenous mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus and steroids in primary deceased donor liver transplantation and live donor liver transplantation without antibody induction

With the current immunosuppressive regimens, graft loss secondary to immunological reasons after successful liver transplantation is a rarity; acute rejections, however, do occur, with the majority of them being steroid-responsive. The aim of the present study is to examine the rate of acute rejection with tacrolimus, intravenous (IV) mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids in primary deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) and live donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients. During the year 2005, 130 patients (mean age: 54.9 +/- 10.8, males: 84, females: 46, 112 DDLT and 18 LDLT) received primary liver transplantation. They were followed up for the incidence of acute rejection in the first 12 months. Liver biopsies were performed as clinically indicated; protocol liver biopsies were never performed. A total of 127 liver biopsies were performed. Thirty-two had a rejection activity index (RAI) score of > or =3, of which 24 biopsies in 20 patients were not treated with a steroid bolus. Eight (6.1%) patients (mean RAI score: 5.1 +/- 1.4) received 750 to 1500 mg of methylprednisolone over 3 days. Out of these, 2 were noncompliant, 4 were off MMF, and 1 was on cyclosporine. All patients responded to steroid therapy. None of the patients required any antibody preparation. In conclusion, IV MMF with tacrolimus and steroids is useful and required antirejection therapy in 6.1% of liver transplant recipients.

Limited sampling strategy for mycophenolic acid in Japanese heart transplant recipients: comparison of cyclosporin and tacrolimus treatment

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in Japanese heart transplant recipients and to find the time point that has the best correlation with the MPA area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-two Japanese recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil were evaluated in the study. Approximately 9 months after transplantation, the area under the MPA serum concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12 h)) was evaluated. The MPA AUC(0-12 h) h values in the cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (FK) groups ranged from 13.11 to 50.98 mug . h/ml and from 39.19 to 93.18 mug . h/ml, respectively. Fourteen models were developed and analyzed for their ability to estimate the MPA AUC(0-12 h) based on a limited number of samples in the CsA group. Sixteen models were developed in the FK group. The best model for predicting the full MPA AUC(0-12 h) in the CsA group was a 3-time-point model that included C(0 h), C(1 h) and C(2 h) (r(2), 0.96; mean prediction error, 0.15+/-7.85%); a 2-time-point model that included C(0 h), and C(2 h) (r(2), 0.94; mean prediction error, 0.495+/-10.35%) was also reliable. In the FK group, a 3-time-point model that included C(1 h), C(2 h) and C(4h) (r(2), 0.73; mean prediction error, 2.73+/-17.09%) was the best model for predicting the full MPA AUC(0-12 h), but it was not reliable in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

A 3-(C(0 h), C(1 h) and C(2 h)) and a 2-time-point model (C(0 h) and C(2 h)) are useful for predicting the full MPA AUC(0-12 h) in Japanese heart transplant recipients treated with CsA but not with FK.

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in liver transplant patients after intravenous and oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil

The bioavailability of mycophenolic acid (MPA) after oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been reported to be more than 90% in healthy volunteers, and in kidney and thoracic organ transplant patients. Such information is limited in liver transplant (LTx) patients. The present study compares the pharmacokinetics of MPA after intravenous (IV) and oral administrations of MMF in LTx recipients. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using WinNonlin software. A total of 12 deceased donor LTx patients initially received IV MMF and were switched to oral MMF after 2-7 days (mean, 3.3 +/- 1.7) when oral feeds were started. Multiple blood samples were drawn immediately prior to and after IV or oral MMF and the plasma concentration of MPA was measured. The mean peak plasma concentrations and the area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC) were significantly higher after IV MMF compared to oral MMF (peak plasma concentrations of 10.7 +/- 2.1 microg/mL for IV vs. 4.5 +/- 2.8 microg/mL for oral; P = 0.0001; and AUC of 28.9 +/- 7.1 microg . hr/mL for IV vs. 12.8 +/- 4.2 microg . hr/mL for oral; P = 0.0001). The oral bioavailability of MPA was 48.5 +/- 18.7%. The systemic clearance, half-life, and steady state volume of distribution of MPA were 26.9 +/- 6 L/hour, 5.5 hours, and 85 liters, respectively. The terminal disposition half-life was not significantly different between the 2 routes of administration. In conclusion, during the early postoperative period, LTx recipients have MPA exposure with oral MMF of less than half that of IV MMF. Use of IV MMF immediately post-LTx may provide an immunological advantage.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients

This review aims to provide an extensive overview of the literature on the clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplantation and a briefer summary of current pharmacodynamic information. Strategies are suggested for further optimisation of mycophenolate therapy and areas where additional research is warranted are highlighted. Mycophenolate has gained widespread acceptance as the antimetabolite immunosuppressant of choice in organ transplant regimens. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is the active drug moiety. Currently, two mycophenolate compounds are available, mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated (EC) mycophenolate sodium. MPA is a potent, selective and reversible inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), leading to eventual arrest of T- and B-lymphocyte proliferation. Mycophenolate mofetil and EC-mycophenolate sodium are essentially completely hydrolysed to MPA by esterases in the gut wall, blood, liver and tissue. Oral bioavailability of MPA, subsequent to mycophenolate mofetil administration, ranges from 80.7% to 94%. EC-mycophenolate sodium has an absolute bioavailability of MPA of approximately 72%. MPA binds 97-99% to serum albumin in patients with normal renal and liver function. It is metabolised in the liver, gastrointestinal tract and kidney by uridine diphosphate gluconosyltransferases (UGTs). 7-O-MPA-glucuronide (MPAG) is the major metabolite of MPA. MPAG is usually present in the plasma at 20- to 100-fold higher concentrations than MPA, but it is not pharmacologically active. At least three minor metabolites are also formed, of which an acyl-glucuronide has pharmacological potency comparable to MPA. MPAG is excreted into the urine via active tubular secretion and into the bile by multi-drug resistance protein 2 (MRP-2). MPAG is de-conjugated back to MPA by gut bacteria and then reabsorbed in the colon. Mycophenolate mofetil and EC-mycophenolate sodium display linear pharmacokinetics. Following mycophenolate mofetil administration, MPA maximum concentration usually occurs in 1-2 hours. EC-mycophenolate sodium exhibits a median lag time in absorption of MPA from 0.25 to 1.25 hours. A secondary peak in the concentration-time profile of MPA, due to enterohepatic recirculation, often appears 6-12 hours after dosing. This contributes approximately 40% to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). The mean elimination half-life of MPA ranges from 9 to 17 hours. MPA displays large between- and within-subject pharmacokinetic variability. Dose-normalised MPA AUC can vary more than 10-fold. Total MPA concentrations should be interpreted with caution in patients with severe renal impairment, liver disease and hypoalbuminaemia. In such individuals, MPA and MPAG plasma protein binding may be altered, changing the fraction of free MPA available. Apparent oral clearance (CL/F) of total MPA appears to increase in proportion to the increased free fraction, with a reduction in total MPA AUC. However, there may be little change in the MPA free concentration. Ciclosporin inhibits biliary excretion of MPAG by MRP-2, reducing enterohepatic recirculation of MPA. Exposure to MPA when mycophenolate mofetil is given in combination with ciclosporin is approximately 30-40% lower than when given alone or with tacrolimus or sirolimus. High dosages of corticosteroids may induce expression of UGT, reducing exposure to MPA. Other co-medications can interfere with the absorption, enterohepatic recycling and metabolism of mycophenolate. Most pharmacokinetic investigations of MPA have involved mycophenolate mofetil rather than EC-mycophenolate sodium therapy. In population pharmacokinetic studies, MPA CL/F in adults ranges from 14.1 to 34.9 L/h (ciclosporin co-therapy) and from 11.9 to 25.4 L/h (tacrolimus co-therapy). Patient bodyweight, serum albumin concentration and immunosuppressant co-therapy have a significant influence on CL/F. The majority of pharmacodynamic data on MPA have been obtained in patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil therapy in the first year after kidney transplantation. Low MPA AUC is associated with increased incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection. Gastrointestinal adverse events may be dose related. Leukopenia and anaemia have been associated with high MPA AUC, trough concentration and metabolite concentrations in some, but not all, studies. High free MPA exposure has been identified as a risk factor for leukopenia in some investigations. Targeting a total MPA AUC from 0 to 12 hours (AUC12) of 30-60 mg.hr/L is likely to minimise the risk of acute rejection and may reduce toxicity. IMPDH monitoring is in the early experimental stage. Individualisation of mycophenolate therapy should lead to improved patient outcomes. MPA AUC12 appears to be the most useful exposure measure for such individualisation. Limited sampling strategies and Bayesian forecasting are practical means of estimating MPA AUC12 without full concentration-time profiling. Target concentration intervention may be particularly useful in the first few months post-transplant and prior to major changes in anti-rejection therapy. In patients with impaired renal or hepatic function or hypoalbuminaemia, free drug measurement could be valuable in further interpretation of MPA exposure.

Limited sampling strategy for predicting area under the concentration-time curve of mycophenolic acid in adult lung transplant recipients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To develop limited sampling strategies for estimation of mycophenolic acid exposure (by determining area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) in lung transplant recipients by using sampling times within 2 hours after drug administration and a maximum of three plasma samples.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label clinical study.

SETTING

Lung transplant clinic in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

PATIENTS

Nineteen adult (mean age 48.3 yrs) lung transplant recipients who were receiving mycophenolate mofetil therapy along with cyclosporine (9 patients) or tacrolimus (10 patients).

INTERVENTION

Eleven blood samples were collected from each of the 19 patients over 12 hours: immediately before (0 hr) and 0.3, 0.6, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after administration of mycophenolate mofetil.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Mycophenolic acid levels in plasma were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection method. The 19 patients were randomly divided into index (10 patients) and validation (9 patients) groups. Limited sampling strategies were developed with multiple regression analysis by using data from the index group. Data from the validation group were used to test each strategy. Bias and precision of each limited sampling strategy were determined by calculating the mean prediction error and the root mean square error, respectively. The correlation between AUC and single concentrations was generally poor (r2= 0.18-0.73). Two single-concentration strategies, eight two-concentration strategies, and eight three-concentration strategies matched our criteria. However, the best overall limited sampling strategies (and their predictive performance) were the following: log AUC = 0.241 log C0 + 0.406 log C2 + 1.140 (bias -5.82%, precision 5.97%, r2= 0.828) and log AUC = 0.202 log C0 + 0.411 log C1.5 + 1.09 (bias -5.71%, precision 6.94%, r2= 0.791), where Cx is mycophenolic acid concentration at time x hours.

CONCLUSION

Two-concentration limited sampling strategies provided minimally biased and highly precise estimation of mycophenolic acid AUC in lung transplant recipients. These optimal and most clinically feasible limited sampling strategies are based collectively on the number of blood samples required, r2 value, bias, and precision.

Aberrant Phenotype and Function of Myeloid Dendritic Cells in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by a systemic autoimmune response with profound and diverse T cell changes. Dendritic cells (DCs) are important orchestrators of immune responses and have an important role in the regulation of T cell function. The objective of this study was to determine whether myeloid DCs from individuals with SLE display abnormalities in phenotype and promote abnormal T cell function. Monocyte-derived DCs and freshly isolated peripheral blood myeloid DCs from lupus patients displayed an abnormal phenotype characterized by accelerated differentiation, maturation, and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines. These abnormalities were characterized by higher expression of the DC differentiation marker CD1a, the maturation markers CD86, CD80, and HLA-DR, and the proinflammatory cytokine IL-8. In addition, SLE patients displayed selective down-regulation of the maturation marker CD83 and had abnormal responses to maturation stimuli. These abnormalities have functional relevance, as SLE DCs were able to significantly increase proliferation and activation of allogeneic T cells when compared with control DCs. We conclude that myeloid DCs from SLE patients display significant changes in phenotype which promote aberrant T cell function and could contribute to the pathogenesis of SLE and organ damage.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in transplantation

A roundtable meeting to discuss the use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to guide immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil was held in New York in December 2004. Existing recommendations for the initial months after transplantation were updated. After ensuring adequate levels of mycophenolic acid (MPA, the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil) immediately after transplantation, optimal efficacy may require only a few dose adjustments, because intrapatient variability in exposure seems low. Recommendations based on current knowledge were made for posttransplantation sampling time points and for target MPA concentrations. Algorithms for estimating MPA exposure using limited sampling strategies were presented, and a new assay for MPA discussed. It was agreed that because of interpatient variability and the influence of concomitant immunosuppressants, TDM might help optimize outcomes, especially in patients at higher risk of rejection. The value of TDM in the general transplant population will be assessed from large, ongoing, randomized studies.

Mycophenolate mofetil in islet cell transplant: variable pharmacokinetics but good correlation between total and unbound concentrations

The authors investigated the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid over 1 year in 8 Caucasian women undergoing islet cell transplantation. Total mycophenolic acid AUC(0-12) mcg x h/mL before day 60 was 62.1-67.8, declining to 33.6-64.7 thereafter (P = .61). Median total trough concentrations were 1.16-2.90 mcg/mL. Unbound AUC(0-12) was 412-673 ng x h/mL and did not change over time (P = .30). Median percent unbound mycophenolic acid was 0.95% of total concentrations. Individual unbound and total mycophenolic acid concentrations were highly correlated (r2 = 0.94). Total mycophenolic acid trough concentration and total AUC(0-12) were modestly correlated (r2 = 0.65). Intra- and interpatient variability of systemic mycophenolic acid exposure was high. Six patients required dose reductions prior to day 60 due to adverse effects. All subjects achieved insulin independence; 3 later lost graft function. The trend toward higher exposure in the early periods followed by dose reductions suggests that lower initial doses and therapeutic drug monitoring may be necessary.

Mycophenolate mofetil in organ transplantation: focus on metabolism, safety and tolerability

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) received its first approval for the prevention of renal allograft rejection in 1995 and has now become the most frequently used antiproliferative agent in maintenance immunosuppressive therapy for kidney, pancreas, liver and heart transplantation. In addition, its use for the treatment of autoimmune diseases steadily increases. This review focuses on the miscellaneous pharmacodynamic properties of the drug, its pharmacokinetics in healthy subjects, recipients of different organ transplants and combination therapy with other pharmaceuticals, as well as its safety profile. The immunosuppressive activity of MMF is thought to derive mainly from the potent and selective inhibition of purine synthesis in both T and B lymphocytes. In contrast to other immunosuppressants on the market, it is metabolised primarily by glucuronidation and lacks nephrotoxicity, cardiovascular toxicity or diabetogenic potential, thus making it a suitable candidate for combination regimens. The most important side effects under MMF include gastrointestinal disorders, of which the underlying mechanisms are not yet fully understood, but seem to be complex and related to both effects of mycophenolic acid and its acyl glucuronide, as well as to decreased -immunity due to general immunosuppression after transplantation.

Immunosuppressant Drug Monitoring: Is the Laboratory Meeting Clinical Expectations?

OBJECTIVE:

To review the literature relating to immunosuppressant drug measurement as performed in therapeutic drug monitoring laboratories associated with transplantation centers and consider whether the assay methods widely used for patient dosage management achieve acceptable quality criteria in the context of other sources of variability with these drugs.

DATA SOURCES:

Articles used were accessed primarily through MEDLINE, as well as references cited in related publications. Searches were restricted to organ transplantation in humans.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:

Emphasis was placed on the literature relating to the quality of immunosuppressant drug assays, their limitations, and evidence of clinical benefit in dosage individualization.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

There is a dilemma evident between the quality of the analytical services offered by some diagnostic immunoassay manufacturers and the ability of a significant number of clinical laboratories globally to select only appropriate assay methods.

CONCLUSIONS:

In many cases, clinical laboratories fail to meet the reasonable clinical expectations required for interpretation of immunosuppressant drug assay results as an adjunct to optimal dosage individualization and patient care.