Reduced-Dose Influenza Vaccine

Modelling epidemics with fractional-dose vaccination in response to limited vaccine supply

The control strategies of emergency infectious diseases are constrained by limited medical resources. The fractional dose vaccination strategy as one of feasible strategies was proposed in response to global shortages of vaccine stockpiles. Although a variety of epidemic models have been developed under the circumstances of limited resources in treatment, few models particularly investigated vaccination strategies in resource-limited settings. In this paper, we develop a two-group SIR model with incorporation of proportionate mixing patterns and n-fold fractional dose vaccination related parameters to evaluate the efficiency of fractional dose vaccination on disease control at the population level. The existence and uniqueness of the final size of the two-group SIR epidemic model, the formulation of the basic reproduction number and the relationship between them are established. Moreover, numerical simulations are performed based on this two-group vector-free model to investigate the effectiveness of n-fold fractional dose vaccination by using the emergency outbreaks of yellow fever in Angola in 2016. By employing linear and nonlinear dose-response relationships, we compare the resulting fluctuations of four characteristics of the epidemics, which are the outbreak size, the peak time of the outbreak, the basic reproduction number and the infection attack rate (IAR). For both types of dose-response relationships, dose-fractionation takes positive effects in lowering the outbreak size, delay the peak time of the outbreak, reducing the basic reproduction number and the IAR of yellow fever only when the vaccine efficacy is high enough. Moreover, five-fold fractional dose vaccination strategy may not be the optimal vaccination strategy as proposed by the World Health Organization if the dose-response relationship is nonlinear.

Risk factors for influenza among health care workers during 2009 pandemic, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Influenza was associated with household exposure, aerosol-generating procedures, and lower adherence to hand hygiene recommendations.

Immunogenicity of a half-dose of adjuvanted 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine in adults: a prospective cohort study

We aimed to assess the immunogenicity of a single half-dose of AS03-adjuvanted monovalent 2009 pandemic H1N1 vaccine in healthy adults. Healthy subjects age 20-60 years were prospectively enrolled in a cohort receiving intramuscular administration of a single half-dose (1.875 μg of hemagglutinin [HA]) of adjuvanted 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine. Data from participants enrolled in a concomitant study of immunogenicity following a full-dose (3.75 μg of HA) are presented concurrently. Sera for assessment of hemagglutination-inhibiting (HAI) antibody to the vaccine strain were obtained before and 14 or 21 days after vaccination. Ninety-seven participants received a half-dose and 50 received a full-dose of vaccine. In the half-dose cohort, Food and Drug Administration criteria for immunogenicity regarding seroprotection and seroconversion rates were met for subjects aged 20-45 years, but not for those aged 46-60 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of individuals achieving a post-vaccination HAI titre of ≥1:40, the geometric mean titres of post-vaccination antibody, or the proportion of individuals with a four-fold or greater increase in antibody levels between the two cohorts. Participants 46-60 years of age were significantly less likely to be seroprotected at day 21 than those 20-45 years old in both cohorts. Immunogenicity of a half dose of adjuvanted pH1N1 influenza vaccine was adequate in subjects aged 20-45 years. Dose reduction is a possible strategy for expanding the availability in the event of vaccine shortage in this age group.

A phase I evaluation of inactivated influenza A/H5N1 vaccine administered by the intradermal or the intramuscular route

In a phase I clinical trial, one hundred healthy young adults were randomized to receive two doses 28 days apart of an inactivated, subvirion vaccine containing 15 or 45microg of influenza A/H5N1 hemagglutinin (HA) by the intramuscular (IM) route, or 3 or 9microg of H5 HA by the intradermal(ID) route. Seventy-seven subjects received a third dose. All regimens were safe and well tolerated. Antibody responses after two or three doses were low (<or=20% or <or=38%, respectively) and similar in groups given 3 or 9microg ID or 15microg IM, and were significantly lower than those given 45microg IM. Higher dosages of H5 HA and/or inclusion of adjuvant will be required to enhance immunogenicity by the ID route.

Intradermal influenza vaccination in immunocompromized patients is immunogenic and feasible

BACKGROUND

Many strategies, including intradermal vaccination, have been tested to augment antibody responses upon vaccination. This strategy has not been evaluated in different groups of immunocompromized patients. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to compare the humoral response upon standard intramuscular influenza vaccination with the response upon reduced-dose intradermal vaccination in patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, hematologic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients, and healthy controls.

METHODS

In total 156 immunocompromized patients and 41 healthy controls were randomized to receive either 0.5mL of the 2005/2006 trivalent influenza vaccine intramuscular or 0.1mL intradermal. Humoral responses, determined by hemagglutination inhibition assay, were measured before and 28 days postvaccination. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) and protection rates (PRs) are reported as primary outcomes, adverse events as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Reduced-dose intradermal vaccination leads to similar GMTs and PRs, within all tested groups, compared to the standard intramuscular vaccination. Healthy controls yielded significantly better GMTs and PRs than immunocompromized patients. Local skin reactions after intradermal vaccination occurred less frequent and were milder in immunocompromized patients than in healthy subjects and were predictive for a positive vaccination outcome for individual subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Intradermal influenza vaccination is a feasible alternative for standard intramuscular vaccination in several groups of immunocompromized patients, including those treated with anti-TNF, HIV-infected patients and HSCT patients. The occurrence of a local skin reaction after intradermal vaccination is predictive of a response to at least one of the vaccine antigens.